You are on page 1of 10

Recording requested by, ]

And when recorded return to: ]


]
Ricardo G. Vargas ]
28 Santa Marina St. ]
San Francisco, a !"#$$%] ]
&S'ace abo(e this )ine *or recorder+s
use on)y.,
AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH
Be it known to all courts, governments, and other parties, that I, Ricardo Gustavo Vargas,
am a natural, freeborn Sovereign, without subjects. I am neither subject to an entit anwhere,
nor is an entit subject to me. I neither dominate anone, nor am I dominated.
! authorit for this statement is the same as it is for all free Sovereigns everwhere" the age#
old, timeless, and universal respect for the intrinsic rights, propert, freedoms, and
responsibilities of the Sovereign Individual.
I am not a $person$ when such term is defined in statutes of the %nited States or statutes of the
several states when such definition includes artificial entities. I refuse to be treated as a federall
or state created entit which is onl capable of e&ercising certain rights, privileges, or immunities
as specificall granted b federal or state governments.
I voluntaril choose to compl with the man#made laws which serve to bring harmon to societ,
but no such laws, nor their enforcers, have an authorit over me. I am not in an jurisdiction,
for I am not of subject status.
'onsistent with the eternal tradition of natural common law, unless I have harmed or violated
someone or their propert, I have committed no crime( and am therefore not subject to an
penalt.
I act in accordance with the following %.S. Supreme 'ourt case"
$)he individual ma stand upon his constitutional rights as a citi*en. +e is entitled to carr on
his private business in his own wa. +is power to contract is unlimited. +e owes no such dut ,to
submit his books and papers for an e&amination- to the State, since he receives nothing
therefrom, beond the protection of his life and propert. +is rights are such as e&isted b the
law of the land ,'ommon .aw- long antecedent to the organi*ation of the State, and can onl be
taken from him b due process of law, and in accordance with the 'onstitution. /mong his rights
are a refusal to incriminate himself, and the immunit of himself and his propert from arrest or
sei*ure e&cept under a warrant of the law. +e owes nothing to the public so long as he does not
trespass upon their rights.$ Hale v. Henkel, 012 %.S. 34 at 35 627189.
)hus, be it known to all, that I reserve m natural common law right not to be compelled to
perform under an contract that I did not enter into knowingl, voluntaril, and intentionall. /nd
furthermore, I do not accept the liabilit associated with the compelled and pretended $benefit$
of an hidden or unrevealed contract or commercial agreement.
/s such, the hidden or unrevealed contracts that supposedl create obligations to perform, for
persons of subject status, are inapplicable to me, and are null and void. If I have participated in
an of the supposed $benefits$ associated with these hidden contracts, I have done so under
duress, for lack of an other practical alternative. I ma have received such $benefits$ but I have
not accepted them in a manner that binds me to anthing.
/n such participation does not constitute $acceptance$ in contract law, because of the absence
of full disclosure of an valid $offer,$ and voluntar consent without misrepresentation or
coercion, under contract law. :ithout a valid voluntar offer and acceptance, knowingl entered
into b both parties, there is no $meeting of the minds,$ and therefore no valid contract. /n
supposed $contract$ is therefore void, ab initio.
;rom m age of consent to the date affi&ed below I have never signed a contract knowingl,
willingl, intelligentl, and voluntaril whereb I have waived an of m natural common law
rights, and, as such, Take Notice that I revoke, cancel, and make void ab initio m signature on
an and all contracts, agreements, forms, or an instrument which ma be construed in an wa
to give an agenc or department of an federal or state government authorit, venue, or
jurisdiction over me.
)his position is in accordance with the %.S. Supreme 'ourt decision of Brady v. U.S., 457 %.S.
530 at 53< 627519"
$:aivers of 'onstitutional Rights not onl must be voluntar, the must be knowingl intelligent
acts, done with sufficient awareness of the relevant circumstances and conse=uences.$
)pical e&amples of such compelled and pretended $benefits$ are"
2. The use o Federal Reserve Notes to dischar!e "y de#ts. I have used these onl
because in /merica, there is no other widel recogni*ed currenc.
0. The use o a #ank account$ %ith "y si!nature on the #ank si!nature card. If there is
an hidden contract behind the bank signature card, m signature thereon gives no
validit to it. )he signature is onl for verification of identit. I can be obligated to fulfill
no hidden or unrevealed contract whatsoever, due to the absence of full disclosure and
voluntar consent.
.ikewise, m use of the bank account thereof is due to the absence of a bank not
associated with the ;ederal Reserve sstem. In general, people have been prevented from
issuing their own currencies, and such prevention is in violation of the %nited States
'onstitution. :ere there an alternative, I would be happ to use it. )o not use an bank at
all is impossible or ver difficult, as everone knows, in toda>s marketplace.
4. The use o a Social Security nu"#er. )he number normall assigned to persons of
subject status, I use e&ceptionall, under duress, onl because of the e&treme
inconvenience of operating without one in toda>s marketplace, where it is re=uested b
banks, emploers, lenders, and man other government agencies and businesses. !
reason for using it is not because I wish to participate in the Social Securit sstem, as I
don>t wish to participate. .et it be known that I use the Social Securit number assigned
to me for information only.
3. The use o a driver&s license. /s a free Sovereign, there is no legal re=uirement for me
to have such a license for travelling in m car. )echnicall, the unrevealed legal purpose
of driver>s licenses is commercial in nature. Since I don>t carr passengers for hire, there
is no law re=uiring me to have a license to travel for m own pleasure and that of m
famil and friends. +owever, because of the lack of education of police officers on this
matter, should I be stopped for an reason and found to be without a license, it is likel I
would be ticketed and fined or obligated to appear in court. )herefore, under duress, I
carr a license to avoid e&treme inconvenience.
8. State 'lates on "y car. Similarl, even though technicall, m car does not fit the legal
definition of a $motor vehicle,$ which is used for commercial purposes, nevertheless, I
have registered it with the state and carr the state plates on it, because to have an other
plates or no plates at all, causes me to run the risk of police officer harassment and
e&treme inconvenience.
?. (ast ta) returns iled. /n ta& returns I ma have filed in the past, were filed due to the
dishonest atmosphere of fear and intimidation created b the Internal Revenue Service
6IRS9 and the local assessors> offices( not because there is an law re=uiring me to do so.
@nce I discovered that the IRS and other ta& agencies have been misinforming the public,
I have felt it is m responsible dut to societ to terminate m voluntar participation.
Because such returns were filed under )hreat, Auress, and 'oercion 6)A'9, and no two#
wa contract was ever signed with full disclosure, there is nothing in an past filing of
returns or paments that created an valid contract. )herefore, no legal obligation on m
part was ever created.
5. Birth *ertiicate. )he fact that a birth certificate was granted to me b a local hospital or
government agenc when I entered this world, is irrelevant to m Sovereignt. Bo status,
high or low, can be assigned to another person through a piece of paper, without the
recipient>s full knowledge and consent. )herefore, such a piece of paper provides date
and place information onl. It indicates nothing about jurisdiction, nothing about propert
ownership, nothing about rights, and nothing about subject status. )he onl documents
that can have an legal meaning, as it concerns m status in societ, are those which I
have signed as an adult, with full knowledge and consent, free from misrepresentation or
coercion of an kind.
<. +arria!e license. )he ac=uisition of a marriage license is now being revealed as being
necessar onl for slaves. )he act of a Sovereign such as mself obtaining such a license,
through social custom and ignorance of law, has no legal effect in changing m status.
)his is because an such change in status, if an ma be supposed to occur, could happen
onl through a hidden and unrevealed contract or statute. Since no hidden, unrevealed,
and undisclosed information, if it e&ists, can be lawfull held to be binding, it is null and
void.
7. *hildren in 'u#lic school. )he attendance of m children in government#supported
$public$ schools or government#controlled $private$ schools does not create an legal ta&
obligation for me, nor an other legal obligation, because I never signed a contract
agreeing to such obligation for the supposed $privilege$ of public school attendance.
If an of m children have attended government supported $public$ or controlled
$private$ schools, such was done under duress and not out of free will. Be it known that I
regard $compulsor state education$ as a violation of the )hirteenth /mendment to the
%.S. 'onstitution, which states in relevant part"
$Beither slaver nor involuntar servitude, e&cept as a punishment for crime
whereof the part shall have been dul convicted, shall e&ist within the %nited
States, or an place subject to their jurisdiction.$
21. Declaration o *iti,enshi'. /n document I ma have ever signed, in which I answered
$es$ to the =uestion, $/re ou a %.S. citi*enC$ # cannot be used to compromise m status
as a Sovereign, nor obligate me to perform in an manner. )his is because without full
written disclosure of the definition and conse=uences of such supposed $citi*enship,$
provided in a document bearing m signature given freel without misrepresentation or
coercion, there can be no legall binding contract.
I am not a $%nited States$ citi*en subject to its jurisdiction. )he %nited States is an entit
created b the %.S. 'onstitution with jurisdiction as described on the following pages of
this /ffidavit. I am not a $resident of,$ an $inhabitant of,$ a $franchise of,$ a $subject of,$
a $ward of,$ the $propert of,$ the $chattel of,$ or $subject to the jurisdiction of$ an
corporate federal government, corporate state government, corporate count government,
corporate cit government, or corporate municipal bod politic created under the
authorit of the %.S. 'onstitution. I am not subject to an legislation, department, or
agenc created b such authorities, nor to the jurisdiction of an emploees, officers, or
agents deriving their authorit therefrom. ;urther, I am not a subject of the
/dministrative and .egislative /rticle IV 'ourts of the several states, or /rticle I 'ourts
of the %nited States, or bound b precedents of such courts, deriving their jurisdiction
from said authorities. Take Notice that I hereb revoke, cancel, and make void ab initio
an such instrument or an presumed election made b an of the several states or the
%nited States government or an agenc or department thereof, that I am or ever have
voluntar elected to be treated as a %nited States citi*en subject to its jurisdiction or a
resident of an territor, possession, instrumentalit or enclave under the sovereignt or
e&clusive jurisdiction of an of the several states or of the %nited States as defined in the
%.S. 'onstitution in /rticle I, Section <, 'lause 25 and /rticle IV, Section 4, 'lause 0.
22. (ast voter re!istration. Similarl, since no obligation to perform in an manner was
ever revealed in print, as part of the re=uirements for the supposed $privilege$ to vote for
government officials, an such registration on m part cannot be legal evidence of an
obligation to perform. .ikewise, I have granted B@ jurisdiction over me, to an political
office. It is m inherent right to vote on elections or issues that I feel affect all of societ(
B@) because I need anone to rule over me. @n the contrar # I have used the voting
process onl to instruct my public servants what a 'iti*en and Sovereign would like
done.
20. Use o the -.letter state code and ,i' code. ! use of the 0#letter state code and *ip
code in m $address,$ which is secretl codified to indicate %nited States $federal *one$
jurisdiction, has no effect whatsoever on m Sovereign status. Simpl b receiving or
sending $mail$ through a =uasi#federal messenger service, the postal service, at a location
indicated with a 0#letter state code and *ip code, cannot place me under federal
jurisdiction or obligation. Such a presumption would be ludicrous.
I use these codes onl for the purposes of information and making it more efficacious for
the %.S. Dostal Service to deliver m mail.
24. Use o se"antics. )here are some immature people with mental imbalances, such as the
craving to dominate other people, who mas=uerade as $government.$ Eust because the
alter definitions of words in the law books to their supposed advantage, doesn>t mean I
accept those definitions. )he fact that the define the words $person,$ $address,$ $mail,$
$resident,$ $motor vehicle,$ $driving,$ $passenger,$ $emploee,$ $income,$ and man
others, in was different from the common usage, so as to be associated with a subject or
slave status, means nothing in real life.
Because the courts have become entangled in the game of semantics, be it known to all
courts and all parties, that if I have ever signed an document or spoken an words on
record, using words defined b twists in the law books different from the common usage,
there can be no effect whatsoever on m Sovereign status in societ thereb, nor can
there be created an obligation to perform in an manner, b the mere use of such words.
:here the meaning in the common dictionar differs from the meaning in the law
dictionar, it is the meaning in common dictionar that prevails, because it is more
trustworth.
Such compelled and supposed $benefits$ include, but are not limited to, the aforementioned
tpical e&amples. ! use of such alleged $benefits$ is under duress onl, and is with full
reservation of all m common law rights. I have waived none of m intrinsic rights and freedoms
b m use thereof. ;urthermore, m use of such compelled $benefits$ ma be temporar, until
better alternatives become available, practical, and widel recogni*ed.
F/D/RA0 1URISDI*TION
It is further relevant to this /ffidavit that an violation of m Rights, ;reedom, or Dropert b
the %.S. federal government, or an agent thereof, would be an illegal and unlawful e&cess,
clearl outside the limited boundaries of federal jurisdiction. ! understanding is that the
jurisdiction of the %.S. federal government is defined b /rticle I, Section <, 'lause 25 of the
%.S. 'onstitution, =uoted as follows"
$)he 'ongress shall have the power . . . )o e&ercise e&clusive legislation in all cases whatsoever,
over such district 6B@) FG'FFAIBG )FB !I.FS SH%/RF9 as ma, b cession of particular
states and the acceptance of 'ongress, become the seat of the Government of the %nited States,
,Aistrict of 'olumbia- and to e&ercise like authorit over all places purchased b the consent of
the legislature of the state in which the same shall be, for the Frection of ;orts, !aga*ines,
/rsenals, dock ards and other needful Buildings( /nd # )o make all laws which shall be
necessar and proper for carring into F&ecution the foregoing Dowers...$ ,emphasis added-
and /rticle IV, Section 4, 'lause 0"
$)he 'ongress shall have the Dower to dispose of and make all needful Rules and Regulations
respecting the )erritor or other Dropert belonging to the %nited States( and nothing in this
'onstitution shall be so construed as to Drejudice an 'laims of the %nited States, or of an
particular State.$
)he definition of the $%nited States$ being used here, then, is limited to its territories"
29 )he Aistrict of 'olumbia
09 'ommonwealth of Duerto Rico
49 %.S. Virgin Islands
39 Guam
89 /merican Samoa
?9 Borthern !ariana Islands
59 )rust )erritor of the Dacific Islands
<9 !ilitar bases within the several states
79 ;ederal agencies within the several states
It does not include the several states the"selves, as is confirmed b the following cites"
$:e have in our political sstem a Government of the %nited States and a government of each of
the several States. Fach one of these governments is distinct from the others, and each has
citi*ens of its own who owe it allegiance, and whose rights, within its jurisdiction, it must
protect. )he same person ma be at the same time a citi*en of the %nited States and a 'iti*en of
a State, but his rights of citi*enship under one of these governments will be different from those
he has under the other.$ Slaughter +ouse 'ases United States vs. *ruikshank, 70 %.S. 830
62<589.
$)+F %BI)FA S)/)FS G@VFRB!FB) IS / ;@RFIGB '@RD@R/)I@B :I)+ RFSDF')
)@ / S)/)F.$ ,emphasis added- Volu"e -23 *or'us 1uris Sec. I25<8" BJ re" !erriam 4?
B.F. 818 2332 S.'t.2754, 32 ..Fd.0<5.
)his is further confirmed b the following =uote from the Internal Revenue Service"
;ederal jurisdiction $includes the Aistrict of 'olumbia, the 'ommonwealth of Duerto Rico, the
Virgin Islands, Guam, and /merican Samoa.$ # Internal Revenue 'ode Section 4206e9.
In le!al terminolog, the word 4includes4 means 4is li"ited to.4
:hen referring to this $Aistrict$ %nited States, the Internal Revenue 'ode uses the term
45ITHIN4 the %nited States. :hen referring to the several States, the Internal Revenue 'ode
uses the term 45ITHOUT4 the %nited States.
Ao*ens, perhaps hundreds, of court cases prove that federal jurisdiction is limited to the few
federal territor areas above indicated. ;or e&ample, in two Supreme 'ourt cases, it was decided"
$)he laws of 'ongress in respect to those matters do not e&tend into the territorial limits of the
states, but have force onl in the Aistrict of 'olumbia, and other places that are within the
e&clusive jurisdiction of the national government,$ *aha v. United States, 280 %.S., at 028.
$:e think a proper e&amination of this subject will show that the %nited States never held an
municipal sovereignt, jurisdiction, or right of soil in and to the territor, of which /labama or
an of the new States were formed...$
$,B-ecause, the %nited States have no constitutional capacit to e&ercise municipal jurisdiction,
sovereignt, or eminent domain, within the limits of a State or elsewhere, e&cept in the cases in
which it is e&pressl granted...$
$/labama is therefore entitled to the sovereignt and jurisdiction over all the territor within her
limits, subject to the common law,$ (ollard v. Ha!an, 33 %.S. 002, 004, 00<, 007.
.ikewise, )itle 2< of the %nited States 'ode at I5 specifies that the $territorial jurisdiction$ of
the %nited States e&tends onl outside the boundaries of lands belonging to an of the several
States.
Thereore, in addition to the fact that no unrevealed federal contract can obligate me to perform
in an manner without m full informed and uncoerced consent, likewise, no federal statutes or
regulations appl to me or have an jurisdiction over me. I hereb affirm that I do not reside or
work in an federal territor of the $Aistrict$ %nited States, and that therefore no %.S. federal
government statutes or regulations have an authorit over me.
(O5/RS AND *ONTRA*TUA0 OB0I6ATIONS OF UNIT/D STAT/S AND STAT/
6OV/RN+/NT OFFI*IA0S
/ll %nited States and State government officials are hereb put on notice that I e&pect them to
have recorded valid @aths of @ffice in accordance with the %.S. 'onstitution, /rticle VI"
$)he Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the members of the several State
.egislatures, and all e&ecutive and judicial officers, both of the %nited States and of the several
States, shall be bound b oath or affirmation to support this 'onstitution...$
I understand that b their @aths of @ffice all %.S. and State government officials are
contractuall bound b the %.S. 'onstitution as formulated b its framers, and not as
$interpreted,$ subverted, or corrupted b the %.S. Supreme 'ourt or other courts.
/ccording to the Binth /mendment to the %.S. 'onstitution"
$)he enumeration in the 'onstitution of certain rights shall not be construed to den or disparage
others retained b the people.$
and the )enth /mendment to the %.S. 'onstitution"
$)he powers not delegated to the %nited States b the 'onstitution, nor prohibited b it to the
States, are reserved to the States respectivel, or to the people.$
)hus, m understanding from these /mendments is that the powers of all %.S. and State
government officials are limited to those specificall granted b the %.S. 'onstitution.
I further understand that an laws, statutes, ordinances, regulations, rules, and procedures
contrar to the %.S. 'onstitution, as written b its framers, are null and void, as e&pressed in the
Si&teenth /merican Eurisprudence Second Fdition, Section 255"
$)he general misconception is that an statute passed b legislators bearing the appearance of
law constitutes the law of the land. )he %.S. 'onstitution is the supreme law of the land, and an
statute, to be valid, must be in agreement. It is impossible for both the 'onstitution and a law
violating it to be valid( one must prevail. )his is succinctl stated as follows"
$)he general rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having the form and name of law, is
in realit no law, but is wholl void, and ineffective for an purpose( since unconstitutionalit
dates from the time of its enactment, and not merel from the date of the decision so branding it.
/n unconstitutional law, in legal contemplation, is as inoperative as if it had never been passed.
Such a statute leaves the =uestion that it purports to settle just as it would be had the statute not
been enacted.$
$Since an unconstitutional law is void, the general principles follow that it imposes no duties,
confers no right, creates no office, bestows no power or authorit on anone, affords no
protection, and justifies no acts performed under it...$
$/ void act cannot be legall consistent with a valid one. /n unconstitutional law cannot operate
to supersede an e&isting valid law. Indeed, insofar as a statute runs counter to the fundamental
law of the land, it is superseded thereb.$
$Bo one is bound to obe an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it.$$
,emphasis added-
and as e&pressed once again in the %.S. 'onstitution, /rticle VI"
$)his 'onstitution, and the laws of the %nited States which shall be made in pursuance thereof(
and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authorit of the %nited States, shall be
the supreme law of the land( and the judges in ever State shall be bound thereb, anthing in the
'onstitution or laws of an State to the contrar notwithstanding.$
/ll %.S. and State government officials are therefore hereb put on notice that an violations of
their contractual obligations to act in accordance with their %.S. 'onstitution, ma result in
prosecution to the full e&tent of the law, as well as the application of all available legal remedies
to recover damages suffered b an parties damaged b an actions of %.S. and State
government officials in violation of the %.S. 'onstitution.
R/VO*ATION OF (O5/R OF ATTORN/7
;urthermore, I hereb revoke, rescind, and make void ab initio, all powers of attorne, in fact or
otherwise, implied in law or otherwise, signed either b me or anone else, as it pertains to the
Social Securit number assigned to me, KKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKK as it pertains to m birth
certificate, marriage or business license, or an other licenses or certificates issued b an and all
government or =uasi#governmental entities, due to the use of various elements of fraud b said
agencies to attempt to deprive me of m Sovereignt andLor propert.
I hereb waive, cancel, repudiate, and refuse to knowingl accept an alleged $benefit$ or
gratuit associated with an of the aforementioned licenses, numbers, or certificates. I do hereb
revoke and rescind all powers of attorne, in fact or otherwise, signed b me or otherwise,
implied in law or otherwise, with or without m consent or knowledge, as it pertains to an and
all propert, real or personal, corporeal or incorporeal, obtained in the past, present, or future. I
am the sole and absolute legal owner and possess allodial title to an and all such propert.
Take Notice that I also revoke, cancel, and make void ab initio all powers of attorne, in fact, in
presumption, or otherwise, signed either b me or anone else, claiming to act on m behalf,
with or without m consent, as such power of attorne pertains to me or an propert owned b
me, b, but not limited to, an and all =uasiLcolorable, public, governmental entities or
corporations on the grounds of constructive fraud, concealment, and nondisclosure of pertinent
facts.
I affirm that all of the foregoing is true and correct. I affirm that I am of lawful age and am
competent to make this /ffidavit. I hereb affi& m own signature to all of the affirmations in
this entire document with e&plicit reservation of all m unalienable rights and m specific
common law right not to be bound b an contract or obligation which I have not entered into
knowingl, willingl, voluntaril, and without misrepresentation, duress, or coercion.
)he use of notar below is for identification onl, and such use does B@) grant an jurisdiction
to anone.
FURTH/R AFFIANT SAITH NOT.
Subscribed and sworn, without prejudice, and with all rights reserved,
6Drint Bame Below9
KKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKK,
Drincipal, b Special /ppearance, in Dropria Dersona, proceeding Sui Euris.
My -and and Mar. as Subscriber &Sign /a0e 1e)ow,
2ate:3333333333333 o00on 4aw Sea):3333333333333333333333333333333333
@n this KKKKKKda ofKKKKKKKKKKKK, 27KKKK, before me, the undersigned, a Botar Dublic in
and for KKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKK6state9, personall appeared the above#signed, known to me
to be the one whose name is signed on this instrument, and has acknowledged to me that sLhe has
e&ecuted the same.
Signed"KKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKK
Drinted Bame"KKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKK
Aate"KKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKK
! 'ommission F&pires"KKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKK

You might also like