You are on page 1of 18

Math Geosci (2011) 43: 483500

DOI 10.1007/s11004-011-9326-9
Validation Techniques for Geological Patterns
Simulations Based on Variogram and Multiple-Point
Statistics
S. De Iaco S. Maggio
Received: 8 January 2009 / Accepted: 24 September 2010 / Published online: 31 March 2011
International Association for Mathematical Geosciences 2011
Abstract Traditional simulation methods that are based on some form of kriging are
not sensitive to the presence of strings of connectivity of low or high values. They are
particularly inappropriate in many earth sciences applications, where the geological
structures to be simulated are curvilinear. In such cases, techniques allowing the re-
production of multiple-point statistics are required. The aim of this paper is to point
out the advantages of integrating such multiple-statistics in a model in order to al-
low shape reproduction, as well as heterogeneity structures, of complex geological
patterns to emerge. A comparison between a traditional variogram-based simulation
algorithm, such as the sequential indicator simulation, and a multiple-point statistics
algorithm (e.g., the single normal equation simulation) is presented. In particular, it is
shown that the spatial distribution of limestone with meandering channels in Lecce,
Italy is better reproduced by using the latter algorithm. The strengths of this study
are, rst, the use of a training image that is not a uvial system and, more impor-
tantly, the quantitative comparison between the two algorithms. The paper focuses
on different metrics that facilitate the comparison of the methods used for limestone
spatial distribution simulation: both objective measures of similarity of facies real-
izations and high-order spatial cumulants based on different third- and fourth-order
spatial templates are considered.
Keywords Validation methods Variogram Multiple-point statistics Training
image Curvilinear structures Snesim High order cumulants
S. De Iaco () S. Maggio
Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche e Matematico-Statistiche, Universit del Salento,
Complesso Ecotekne, Via per Monteroni, Lecce, Italy
e-mail: sandra.deiaco@unisalento.it
S. Maggio
e-mail: sabrina.maggio@unisalento.it
484 Math Geosci (2011) 43: 483500
1 Introduction
In most cases of spatial soil analysis, curvilinear geological structures need modeling.
However, traditional simulation methods based on some form of kriging are unable to
reproduce the presence of this kind of geological heterogeneities (non-elliptical pat-
terns). Although second-order statistics can adequately provide a complete statistical
description of Gaussian processes, they are inappropriate for modeling geological
phenomena that are typically far away from Gaussianity and are characterized by
complex non-linear spatial patterns (Guardiano and Srivastava 1993; Journel 1997;
Tjelmeland 1998; and others). The limitations of variogram-based techniques for rep-
resenting realistic geological continuity can be overcome by using multiple-point
statistics techniques (Strbelle and Journel 2000; Strbelle 2002; Krishnan and Jour-
nel 2003). Multiple-point statistics involve three or more points at a time and are
much more informative than the traditional variogram, which is a two-point statistic;
hence, when integrated in a model, multiple-statistics allow shape reproduction, as
well as long-range connectivity patterns, in the subsurface. However, data at sparse
sample localizations are often not sufcient to infer such multiple statistics. For this
reason, multiple-point geostatistics relies on the concept of training images (concep-
tual geological models), from which higher order statistics can be borrowed.
A fair number of techniques dealing with spatial complexity have been proposed
recently, such as the Markov random eld based approaches (Daly 2004; Tjelme-
land and Eidsvik 2004), a multiple-point method based on lters (Zhang et al. 2006;
Wu et al. 2008), the sequential simulation method simpat based on the calculation of
similarity between patterns (Arpat and Caers 2007) and other related developments
(Boucher 2009; Chugunova and Ly 2008; Mirowski et al. 2009; Remy et al. 2009;
Scheidt and Caers 2009; Gloaguen and Dimitrakopoulos 2009; Honarkhah and Caers
2010; and others). Moreover, Dimitrakopoulos et al. (2010) used spatial cumulants
(combinations of moment statistical parameters) to characterize non-Gaussian ran-
dom variables, focusing on the understanding of the interrelation of cumulant char-
acteristics and in situ behavior of geological entities or processes. Mustapha and Dim-
itrakopoulos (2010b) introduced a new simulation framework for complex non-linear
geological and other spatial patterns that is based on the use of spatial cumulants in
the high-dimensional space of Legendre polynomials. In all of these recent contri-
butions, the two-point variogram is replaced with a training image in order to repro-
duce complex geological patterns. Although these are all considerable advances, it
is very important to have a well-dened spatial stochastic modeling framework as it
contributes to the geostatistical capacity to describe non-Gaussian and/or non-linear
geological phenomena.
In this paper, after a brief review of multiple-point geostatistical concepts includ-
ing the idea of training image and the general denition of multiple-point statis-
tics, the single normal equation methodology is introduced in order to point out
how multiple-point statistics can be incorporated in a model for simulation pur-
poses. Next, the empirical framework concerning limestone spatial distribution is
presented and simulated realizations obtained by using a traditional variogram-based
algorithm (sequential indicator simulation, sisim) (Journel and Huijbregts 1978;
Deutsch and Journel 1998) and a multiple-point statistics algorithm (single nor-
mal equation simulation, snesim) (Strbelle 2000; Remy 2001) are compared. The
Math Geosci (2011) 43: 483500 485
idea is to compare the conditional simulations produced by using two indicator-
based algorithms when the patterns characterizing the phenomenon under study
are complex. Objective measures of the similarity of facies realizations are con-
sidered in order to determine if the sets of realizations generated by sisim and
snesim algorithms have the properties required, in terms of geological shape, ho-
mogeneity and connectivity. A facies realization analyzer program (faprop), pro-
vided by Soleng et al. (2006), is used rst. The following are then computed: the
global volume fractions of each facies, the number of bodies, the surface areas, and
the volumes and extensions in x and y directions for the bodies. Secondly, an al-
gorithm for calculating high-order spatial cumulants (hosc), recently proposed by
Mustapha and Dimitrakopoulos (2010a), is applied; cumulants based on different
third- and fourth-order spatial templates are computed. Hence, a statistical analy-
sis of realizations, as well as a quantitative comparison between the realizations
properties and the training image, is presented. At the end, we will highlight how
limestone spatial distribution with meandering channels are better reproduced by us-
ing a multiple-point statistics algorithm. This further conrms that variogram-based
methods are not sensitive to the presence of curvilinear patterns (Soleng et al. 2006;
Dimitrakopoulos et al. 2010).
2 Multiple-Point Geostatistics
Multiple-point statistics are often used in geostatistical simulation because of their
ability to reproduce complex geological patterns (e.g., undulating channels). Some
interesting applications can be found in the eld of petroleum engineering (Strbelle
and Journel 2000; Strbelle 2002). A key justication for the use of multiple-point
statistics is that they contain a wealth of information compared to second-order mea-
sures (Pan and Szapudi 2005). These statistics can be borrowed froma training image,
which contains information about geological structures prevailing in the subsurface,
as well as about the spatial distribution of the phenomenon under study in general.
Note that geologists usually have a prior conceptual idea of the heterogeneity pat-
terns present in the spatial domain. As a result, training images can sometimes be
hand-drawn by an expert; that is, they need not be conditioned to any local data. The
training images are only bound by the principles of stationarity (the patterns do not
change over the training image) and repetitiveness. Repetitiveness dictates the mini-
mum size of the training. Accordingly, the reproduction of large scale patterns such
as channels would require a large training image, since multiple-point statisticslike
any statisticstend to uctuate, and that uctuation becomes larger as the distances
over which these statistics are calculated become larger (Caers and Zhang 2002).
2.1 Multiple-Point Statistics
Unlike the variogram, which is a two-point statistic based on a two-point congura-
tion (Fig. 1(b)), the multiple-point statistics involve three or more points at a time (Kr-
ishnan and Journel 2003) and they are based on three-point conguration (Fig. 1(c))
or conguration of more than three points (Fig. 1(d) and (e)).
486 Math Geosci (2011) 43: 483500
Fig. 1 Geometric
congurations of variogram and
multiple-point statistics
2.1.1 Formalism of Multiple-Point Statistics
Let Z be a random eld, dened on the domain D R
d
(d 3), such that any ran-
dom variable Z(u) at location u has K mutually exclusive possible states {z
k
, k =
1, 2, . . . , K}. In general, under the usual stationarity hypothesis, a multiple-point
statistic is a measure of the joint variability at more than two locations at a time.
It has been dened by Strbelle and Journel (2000) as the probability that n vari-
ables Z(u+h
1
), Z(u+h
2
), . . . , Z(u+h
n
) are jointly in the states z
k
1
, z
k
2
, . . . , z
k
n
,
respectively; hence, it is obtained by the expected value of the product of the n cor-
responding indicator variables
(h
1
, h
2
, . . . , h
n
; k
1
, k
2
, . . . , k
n
) =E

=1
I (u +h

; k

, (1)
where I (u + h

; k

) is an indicator variable at location u +h

, such that I (u +
h

; k

) =1, if Z(u +h

) =z
k

and I (u +h

; k

) =0 otherwise.
2.2 Single Normal Equation Methodology
Multiple-point statistics simulation is one of the most recent spatial modeling tech-
niques to have been put into use, especially for the reproduction of curvilinear
and long-range connectivity patterns. The single normal equation methodology is
frequently applied in this context (Journel and Alabert 1989; Srivastava 1992;
Guardiano and Srivastava 1993; Strbelle and Journel 2000; Strbelle 2002), in or-
der to integrate such multiple-point statistics in a soil characterization model. A short
presentation of this methodology is given here and a multiple statistics inference from
a training image is also discussed. Let
n
= {h

, = 1, . . . , n} be a geometric tem-
plate and d
n
= {Z(u +h

) = z
k

, = 1, . . . , n} be an associated data event of size


n centered at an unsampled location u to be modeled. The goal is to evaluate the
conditional probability distribution of variable Z(u), given the nearest n sample val-
ues Z(u

) = z
k

, = 1, . . . , n. Let A
0
be an indicator random variable, such that
A
0
=1, if Z(u) =z
k
and A
0
=0, otherwise, and D be the indicator random variable
associated with the case that d
n
occurs. It is easy to show that D can be written as
the product of the binary random variables A

associated with each conditioning data


value z
k

, =1, . . . , n.
Math Geosci (2011) 43: 483500 487
Hence, the generalized indicator kriging formalism can be used and the required
conditional probability can be given by the following simple indicator kriging expres-
sion
P{A
0
=1 | D =1} =E{A
0
} +

1 E{D}

, (2)
where E{A
0
} is the prior probability that Z(u) at the unsampled location u is in
the state z
k
(i.e., prior to the knowledge of the observed data event D = 1), and
E{D} is the probability that the conditioning data event occurs. The single resulting
extended normal equation (kriging system) provides the single weight . One need
not be surprised if the single weight obtained from the kriging system leads to the
notion of conditional probability, provided by Bayes and given as follows
P{A
0
=1 | D =1} =
E{A
0
D}
E{D}
=
P{A
0
=1, D =1}
P{D =1}
. (3)
Further specications can be found in Strbelle (2000).
Hence, as an alternative to a form of kriging based on a variogram model, the con-
ditional probability can be estimated by using the corresponding proportions obtained
from the training image. Invoking a form of stationarity, the conditional probability
in (3) can be inferred using the training ratio between the number of replicates of the
data event d
n
associated with the occurrence of the state z
k
at the central location u
and the number of all replicates of the data event d
n
.
Unlike in the variogram-based algorithm, the conditional probability is not ex-
pressed as a linear combination of the n single data indicators. As a result, it is not
necessary to solve a kriging system in order to obtain the conditioning data weights,
and even less to estimate and model the two-point covariance or variogram: all one
needs is to nd a suitable training image. Of course, nding an appropriate training
image might be hard in a three-dimensional space.
2.2.1 Single Normal Equation Simulation Algorithm
The snesim algorithm is an efcient pixel-based sequential simulation algorithm that
obtains multiple-point statistics from the training images, exports them to the geo-
statistical model and anchors them to the actual subsurface data. For each location u
along a random path, the set of local data values and their spatial conguration
called data eventis recorded. The training image is scanned for replicates that
match this event. The central node values corresponding to the replicates are used
to calculate the conditional probability of the central value given to the data event.
The main steps of the snesim algorithm are described in detail in Strbelle (2000.
2002).
The snesimalgorithmhas been implemented in sgems software (Remy et al. 2009),
which is built by using the Geostatistical Template Library (Remy 2001). This al-
gorithm is essentially the rst practical algorithm proposed for the application of
multiple-point geostatistics.
488 Math Geosci (2011) 43: 483500
3 Empirical Framework and Simulations
In many earth sciences applications, a stochastic model is needed to capture the pat-
terns of geological heterogeneities in the subsurface in question. This may be difcult
or impossible within a particular modeling framework. The aim of the following sec-
tion is to illustrate how a model that includes multiple-point statistics can improve
traditional variogram-based inference, especially in terms of shape reproduction. For
this reason, a thorough quantitative validation of the results of the two-point and
multiple-point simulation methods is provided and their performance is assessed.
Different metrics that facilitate the comparison of results, in terms of general fea-
tures of the bodies and the degree of homogeneity and connectivity, are calculated.
A facies realization analyzer program (faprop), generated by Soleng et al. (2006),
is applied to the training image as well as to the realizations produced by using the
sisim and snesim algorithms. Hence, the comparison criteria are based on observable
physical measures such as the number of bodies, the direction of maximum variabil-
ity, the global volume fraction (as a measure of abundance), the maximal directional
extension of bodies (as a measure of connectivity), the ratio of surface area to volume
(as a measure of ruggedness and shape). Moreover, cumulative distribution functions
of the volume of bodies in the realizations are further analyzed. Secondly, an algo-
rithm for calculating high-order spatial cumulants, recently proposed by Mustapha
and Dimitrakopoulos (2010a), is used. The comparison criteria then have involved
high-order spatial cumulants based on specic spatial templates up to order four. As
it is explained in Sect. 4.2, they are referred to cumulants of orders three and four,
which are enabled to describe the complex geological conguration of the character-
istic under study.
In particular, the empirical framework of interest concerns the spatial distribution
of limestone and dolomitic limestone in Lecce, Italy. Conditional simulations of the
occurrence of limestone and dolomitic limestone (LDL) in Lecce are performed by
using both sisim and snesim. Multiple-point statistics are scanned directly from an
available geological map, used as a training image. Hence, the following steps are
considered:
1. Description of available information about the phenomenon to examine (data set
and training image).
2. Conditional simulations made by using the traditional geostatistical tools.
3. Conditional simulations made by using the multiple-point geostatistics tools.
3.1 Description of Available Information
In this analysis, the geological structure of LDL spatial distribution in Lecce, Italy
has been examined. Let
I (u, LDL) =

1 in case of LDL occurrence,


0 otherwise.
In order to generate conditional simulations of the spatial randomeld {I (u, LDL),
u D R
2
}, a sample data set of 140 indicator values i(u
i
, LDL), i =1, 2, . . . , 140,
Math Geosci (2011) 43: 483500 489
Fig. 2 Posting map of the
sample indicator values
has been selected, by using a patterned sampling, from an exhaustive limestone map
of 24,642 points (Fig. 2).
Moreover, an available geolithologic map of Lecce district with eight possible
states (Fig. 3(a)) has been used as a training image (Fig. 3(b)). In particular, the entire
body of geolithologic information has been coded in bits 0/1 (1 stands for limestone
and dolomitic limestone occurrence and 0 stands for other types of geolithologic
components occurrence) and a training image with a size of 135 185 pixels has
been obtained.
Note that the overall proportion of limestone and dolomitic limestone in the train-
ing image is 24%.
It is evident that the spatial distribution of limestone presents specic curvilinear
patterns of heterogeneity. Accordingly, the modeling of these patterns should require
the use of multiple-point statistics in order to allow long range continuous channels
reproduction.
3.2 Conditional Simulations Made by Using Traditional Geostatistical Tools
In order to apply the sisim algorithm based on an appropriate variogram model, we
computed the sample directional indicator variograms of the binary variable, ob-
served at 140 points. Through a reviewof the directional sample indicator variograms,
a geometric anisotropy with direction of maximum continuity elongated at 135

was
detected.
An exponential model with the parameters (i) nugget effect =0.00415, (ii) effec-
tive range =14.7 km, and (iii) sill value =0.1815 was tted to the directional sample
variogram at 135

.
Figure 4 shows the sample indicator variogram together with the tted model.
Hence, the sisim algorithm, based on the variogram model, has been applied and
six simulations over an 86 121 grid have been obtained, as shown in Fig. 5. In
order to improve spatial continuity, elliptical neighborhoods have been considered
with major axis along 135

(N45W).
490 Math Geosci (2011) 43: 483500
(a)
(b)
Fig. 3 a Geo-lithologic map and b training image
3.3 Conditional Simulations Made by Using Multiple-Point Statistics
In order to use the multiple-point statistics simulation algorithm, we began by xing
a template of size 10,
10
={h

, =1, 2, . . . , 10}, elongated at 135

(N45W), as il-
lustrated in Fig. 6. A multiple grid approach (Gmez-Hernndez 1991; Remy 2001)
was adopted by simulating three nested and increasingly ner grids, and a servosys-
tem correction set to 0.5 was applied. Figure 7 shows the rescaled data templates of
size 10; that is, the data template rescaled proportionally to the spacing of the nodes
within the grid to be simulated. This is done to capture the large scale structures of
the training images. It is well known that this approach improves the reproduction of
long-range continuous channels (Yuhong 2006).
Math Geosci (2011) 43: 483500 491
Fig. 4 Sample indicator
variogram and its model
Fig. 5 Simulated maps obtained by using sisim algorithm
Multiple-point statistics involving ten points have been estimated by scanning the
training image and a search tree (Strbelle 2000, 2002) has been created for each
nested simulation grid. Hence, the snesim algorithm, based on multiple-point statis-
tics, has been applied and six other simulations over the same 86 121 grid have
been obtained, as illustrated in Fig. 8.
492 Math Geosci (2011) 43: 483500
Fig. 6 Template of size 10,
10
,
elongated at 135

Fig. 7 Rescaled data templates


of size 10
Fig. 8 Simulated maps obtained by using snesim algorithm
Math Geosci (2011) 43: 483500 493
4 Validation and Comparison of Results
At the end, a quantitative analysis of the results was performed in order to check if
the two geostatistical simulation algorithms are able to generate realizations where
the essential characteristics of the training image are captured and represented.
The validation and comparison are based on general features of bodies and high-
order cumulants. Note that systematic denitions of high-order spatial cumulants can
be found in Dimitrakopoulos et al. (2010). It is essential to underline that cumulants
are an extension of the well-known covariance function, which is capable of capturing
complex spatial congurations and connectivity patterns in a geological sense. They
allow for large possible combinations of random point variables and they completely
characterize non-linear and non-Gaussian stationary and ergodic random elds.
4.1 Comparison Based on General Features of Realization Bodies
Firstly, we present the comparison criteria of facies realizations based on physically
measurable quantities: the number of bodies, n; the global volume fraction, P (mea-
sure of abundance); the direction of maximum variability, D; the maximal extensions
in x and y directions, Max(X), Max(Y) (measure of connectivity); the mean vol-
ume, V ; the mean area, A; and the mean value of the area to volume ratio, A/V
(measure of ruggedness and shape). The program faprop, proposed by Soleng et al.
(2006), was applied to the training image in Fig. 3(b) and the above-mentioned cri-
teria were evaluated. Then, the same computations were considered for realizations
from snesim and sisim algorithms. For each criterion, the realizations values have
been normalized with respect to the corresponding training image values, so that the
closer the comparison criteria are to unity, the more similar the simulated maps are
to the training image.
The snesim algorithm was more accurate than the sisim algorithm, in the sense
that the resulting realizations were more similar to the training image. The failure of
the variogram-based algorithm is clear from the box and whisker plots in Fig. 9. The
sisim algorithm produced too many tiny objects; as a result, the number of bodies
was too large and the mean volume of the objects was too small. Moreover, the bod-
ies were too rugged; this is reected in the box and whisker plots of Fig. 9, where the
mean ratio of area to volume was high. On the contrary, the multi-point method re-
produced the features of the training image quite well. For all criteria, the realizations
values were close to unity and their variability was very low. The same conclusion
can be drawn when looking at Fig. 10, where the cumulative distribution functions
of the bodies volume of each of the two sets of realizations were compared to the
corresponding training image distribution.
4.2 Comparison Based on High-Order Cumulants
In this section, objective measures of similarity of facies realizations such as high-
order cumulants (Dimitrakopoulos et al. 2010) are considered in order to compare the
spatial architecture of the training image with respect to the two sets of realizations
494 Math Geosci (2011) 43: 483500
Fig. 9 Box and whisker plots of comparison criteria obtained from simulated maps
(generated by sisim and snesim). Taking into account that limestone spatial distribu-
tion is characterized by a geometric anisotropy with a direction of maximum conti-
nuity elongated at 135

, anisotropic experimental high-order cumulants were based


on different spatial templates. They were referred to the following: (i) cumulants of
order two, at 135

; (ii) cumulants of order three, whose templates directions are:


{315

, 45

}, {135

, 135

}, {315

, 135

}, as shown in Fig. 11, (a)(c); (iii) cumulants


of order four, whose templates directions are {135

, 135

, 135}, {315

, 135

, 45

}, as
shown in Fig. 11(d) and (e). The above experimental cumulants have been computed
using hosc for both the training image and the simulated realizations. For each crite-
rion, mean square errors (between experimental cumulants of simulated realizations
Math Geosci (2011) 43: 483500 495
Fig. 10 Cdf of the bodies volume of training image compared to a cdfs of the bodies volume of realiza-
tions from sisim and b cdfs of the bodies volume of realizations from snesim
Fig. 11 Third-order and
fourth-order cumulant templates
used for calculations
and cumulants of the training for each lag) have been calculated so that the closer the
comparison criteria are to zero, the more similar the spatial characteristics of simu-
lated maps are to the training image.
Results are shown in Figs. 12 and 13. Note that for the fourth-order cumulants
maps, three cross sections have been chosen and analyzed, in order to help to clarify
the results. Looking at the box and whisker plots (Figs. 12 and 13), it is evident that
the geological patterns of limestone spatial distribution captured by the high-order
cumulants are better reproduced by the snesimrealizations. This is because the snesim
realizations are characterized by approximately the same high-order cumulant maps
as the training. This means that high cumulant values which identify the interactions
of blocks associated with limestone and dolomitic limestone occurrences (gray blocks
496 Math Geosci (2011) 43: 483500
Fig. 12 Box and whisker plots of comparison criteria based on second-order and third-order cumulants
in Figs. 3(b), 5, and 8) are often located at the same lags for both the training and the
snesim realizations. It is clearly understandable why the comparison of experimental
cumulants is so important in validating simulations of complex patterns. Hence, the
box and whisker plots of Figs. 12 and 13 give a further quantitative conrmation that
the complex spatial congurations and patterns of the snesim realizations are closer
to the training ones than the geological properties of the sisim realizations. The box
and whisker plots associated with the snesim realizations in Fig. 12 are all closer
to zero than the ones related to sisim realizations. They are also characterized by
less variability. Note that the variability of the errors is greater along the direction of
maximum continuity for both sisim and snesim realizations. A signicant difference
between the snesim box and whisker plots, and the sisim box and whisker plots can be
noted for the template direction {315

, 135

}. This is what we should expect when


the template (Fig. 6) used in this paper for snesim simulation is taken into account.
Looking at the box and whisker plots of Fig. 13, it is clear that the experimental
fourth-order cumulants, which are capable of capturing more complex spatial char-
acteristics and interactions among gray blocks (Figs. 3(b), 5, and 8), have produced
for snesim lower mean square errors, for all directions and especially for non-zero
lags.
Math Geosci (2011) 43: 483500 497
Fig. 13 Box and whisker plots of comparison criteria based on fourth-order cumulants
4.3 Visual Inspection
Six images (three from the six sisim maps and three from the six snesim maps) that
have best reproduced the proportion of limestone and dolomitic limestone and the
channel-like objects have been chosen for a graphic comparison (Fig. 14). Hence,
the subjective impression of similarity or dissimilarity obtained through visual in-
spection of the simulated maps has merely conrmed the results obtained from the
above quantitative analysis. It is evident that the limestone spatial distribution with
meandering channels, as well as the most important characteristics of the geolog-
ical structure, is better reproduced by using a multiple-point simulation algorithm
(snesim).
5 Conclusions
In this paper, after a brief review of multiple-point geostatistics, a comparison be-
tween a traditional variogram-based simulation algorithm and a multiple-point statis-
tics algorithm was presented by using a specic empirical framework. Information
about geological structures prevailing in the subsurface was crucial, since multiple-
point statistics have been inferred from the training image reecting the expected
patterns of geological heterogeneities under study.
A quantitative analysis was proposed in order to point out how the two sets of real-
izations reproduce the complex geological structures of the characteristic of interest.
498 Math Geosci (2011) 43: 483500
Fig. 14 Selected maps obtained by using a the sisim algorithm and b the snesim algorithm
The faprop program and the hosc algorithm were used in order to provide a complete
comparison and validation between the snesim-derived and the sisim-derived simula-
tions. It was highlighted how limestone spatial distribution with meandering channels
and other statistics are better reproduced by using a multiple-point statistics algorithm
(snesim). This has further conrmed that traditional methods (sisim) based on some
form of kriging are not sensitive to the presence of non elliptical patterns (Soleng
et al. 2006). Results shown in this paper conrm that the use of multiple-point geo-
statistics is a powerful tool to characterize subsurface heterogeneity for applications
in a wide variety of complex geological settings. This could be further studied in
detail for both binary and continuous images, for two- and three-dimensional elds,
and using other spatial simulation techniques for comparisons, such as simulation
by simulated annealing, boolean simulation of ellipses, truncated Gaussian simula-
tion, as well as the most recent simulation algorithms based on the use of a training
image.
Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank Prof. Posa who stimulated their interest in this
eld, the reviewers for their useful comments and suggestions, Petter Abrahamsen, the Research Director
SAND of the Norwegian Computing Center, for providing the faprop (Facies Properties Analyzer) pro-
gram, and Hussein Mustapha of the Department of Mining and Materials Engineering of McGill University
(Canada), for providing the hosc (High-order spatial cumulants) program as well as for his precious hints.
Math Geosci (2011) 43: 483500 499
References
Arpat G, Caers J (2007) Conditional simulation with patterns. Math Geosci 39(2):177203
Boucher A (2009) Considering complex training images with search tree partitioning. Comput Geosci
35:11511158
Caers J, Zhang T (2002) Multiple-point geostatistics: A quantitative vehicle for integrating geologic
analogs into multiple reservoir models. Stanford University, Stanford Center for Reservoir Forecast-
ing Stanford, 24 p
Chugunova T, Ly H (2008) Multiple-point simulations constrained by continuous auxiliary data. Math
Geosci 40(2):133146
Daly C (2004) Higher order models using entropy, Markov random elds and sequential simulation. In:
Geostatistics Banff 2004. Springer, Berlin, pp 215225
Deutsch CV, Journel AG (1998) GSLIB: Geostatistical software library and users guide. Oxford Univ.
Press, New York, 369 p
Dimitrakopoulos R, Mustapha H, Gloaguen E (2010) High-order statistics of spatial random elds: Explor-
ing spatial cumulants for modeling complex non-Gaussian and non-linear phenomena. Math Geosci
42(1):6599
Gloaguen E, Dimitrakopoulos R (2009) Two-dimensional conditional simulations based on the wavelet
decomposition of training images. Math Geosci 41(6):679701
Gmez-Hernndez JJ (1991) A stochastic approach to the simulation of block conductivity elds condi-
tioned upon data measured at a smaller scale. Ph.D. thesis, Stanford University, Stanford, 365 p
Guardiano FB, Srivastava RM (1993) Multivariate geostatistics: Beyond bivariate moments. In: Soares A
(ed) Geostatistics Troia 92. vol 1. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, pp 133144
Honarkhah M, Caers J (2010) Stochastic simulation of patterns using distance-based pattern modeling.
Math Geosci 42(5):487517
Journel AG (1997) Deterministic geostatistics: A new visit. In: Baafy E, Shoeld N (eds) Geostatistics
Woolongong 96. vol 1. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, pp 213224
Journel AG, Alabert F (1989) Non-Gaussian data expansion in the Earth sciences. Terra Nova 1:123134
Journel AG, Huijbregts CJ (1978) Mining geostatistics. Academic Press, London, 600 p
Krishnan S, Journel AG (2003) Spatial connectivity: From variograms to multiple-point measures. Math
Geol 35(8):915925
Mirowski P, Trtzlaff D, Davies R, McCormick D, Williams N, Signer C (2009) Stationary scores on train-
ing images for multipoint geostatistics. Math Geosci 41(4):447474
Mustapha H, Dimitrakopoulos R (2010a) A new approach for geological pattern recognition using high-
order spatial cumulants. Comput Geosci 36(3):313334
Mustapha H, Dimitrakopoulos R (2010b) Stochastic simulation of complex spatially distributed natural
phenomena. Math Geosci 42(5):457485
Pan J, Szapudi I (2005) Conditional cumulants in a weakly non-linear regime. Mon Not R Astron Soc
361:357361
Remy N (2001) GsTL: The geostatistical template library in C++. Ph.D. thesis, Stanford University, Stan-
ford, 142 p
Remy N, Boucher A, Wu J (2009) Applied geostatistics with SGeMS: a users guide. Cambridge University
Press, New York, 264 p. ISBN:978-0-521-51414-9
Scheidt C, Caers J (2009) Representing spatial uncertainty using distances and kernels. Math Geosci
41(4):397419
Soleng HH, Syversveen AR, Kolbjrnsen O (2006) Comparing facies realizationsDening matrices on
realization space. In: Ecmor X, Proceedings of the 10th European conference in the mathematics of
oil recovery, p A014
Srivastava M (1992) Iterative methods for spatial simulation. Stanford Center for Reservoir Forecasting,
Stanford, p 5
Strbelle S (2000) Sequential simulation drawing structures from training images. Ph.D. thesis, Stanford
University, Stanford, 187 p
Strbelle S (2002) Conditional simulation of complex geological structures using multiple point geostatis-
tics. Math Geol 34(1):122
Strbelle S, Journel AG (2000) Sequential simulation drawing structures from training images. In: Klein-
geld WJ, Krige DG (eds) Geostatistics 2000, 6th international geostatistics congress, Geostatistical
Association of Southern Africa, Cape Town, South Africa, pp 381392
Tjelmeland H (1998) Markov random elds with higher order interactions. Scand J Stat 25:415433
500 Math Geosci (2011) 43: 483500
Tjelmeland H, Eidsvik J (2004) Directional Metropolis: Hastings updates for posteriors with nonlinear
likelihoods. In: Geostatistics Banff 2004. Springer, Berlin, pp 95104
Wu J, Boucher A, Zhang T (2008) Sgems code for pattern simulation of continuous and categorical vari-
ables: Filtersim. Comput Geosci 34:18631876
Yuhong L (2006) Using the snesim program for multiple-point statistical simulation. Comput Geosci
32(10):15441563
Zhang T, Switzer P, Journel A (2006) Filter-based classication of training image patterns for spatial
simulation. Math Geosci 38(1):6380