Guest Post: "The bombs come from Israel, but Gaza's misery is due to Gaza's rule

rs"
Guest Post: "The bombs come from Israel, but Gaza's misery is due to Gaza's rule
rs"
Adam Taylor
As a Canadian living in Israel for many years, Ive worked hard to try and maintai
n a balanced perspective in a place where opinions often come one-sided and red
hot. When so much is at stake, it often serves the interest of parties to confla
te and exaggerate their side of the narrative to help sway opinion both on the s
treet and in the halls of power.
The Israeli-Arab conflict is complex, multi-faceted and reaches far back into hi
story. Writing about it cannot and should not be undertaken lightly but unfortun
ately headlines regarding the conflict sell papers and push traffic to websites
and the result is often the blunt, biased and uninformed articles that are commo
nplace.
The Israeli government is currently selling the war based on the transparent rea
son of 'protecting citizens from rocket fire'. While protecting citizens and the
integrity of its borders is no doubt a factor, Id suggest that at the least the
government drew Hamas into the conflict. This can be seen as part of a policy re
sponse of spoiling the new Hamas tactic, based on the organizations flying succes
s with the Shalit negotiations, of winning concessions by kidnapping Israelis.
You may remember that Israel arrested hundreds of Hamas members following the ki
dnapping of the three Israeli teenagers - including hundreds that had been freed
as part of the Shalit deal and this was part of that same policy response. This
part at least, I'm sure, was part of a well-formulated strategy that Israel wou
ld have promulgated after they released 1000 Palestinians in exchange for Israel
i soldier Gilad Shalit in 2011.
Moreover, the Israeli government may have welcomed the coming conflict with Hama
s on a different level.
Hamas is politically very weak these days (more on that below) and Israel could
be seeking to take advantage of their weakness to do some 'pruning' around Gaza
- destroy rocket launchers, kill a few leaders, keep the organization in some di
sarray and generally avail themselves of the favorable political climate that Is
rael currently finds itself in.
Just as importantly, Israel probably also welcomed the conflict as an opportunit
y to further weaken Hamas and the reconciliation agreement between Hamas and Fat
ah. It could do this by showing Hamas as violent and disruptive, in stark contr
ast to the mostly quiet relations between Israel and the Palestinians that is du
jour in the West Bank.
Further, Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu seems most comfortable operating unde
r the dictum that his citizenry can be best controlled by keeping them afraid wh
ile selling them security, and it's quite possible that he's slipped into the co
nflict because its familiar territory and an easy place to fend off challenges fr
om the right wing -- where his coalition is weakest -- and garner support among
the populace for the next election. Support for the conflict in Israel is high,
despite people's unease with Palestinian casualties.
I've always said that Netanyahu is a masterful politician, if a reprehensible hu
man being.
Now for Hamas.
As mentioned, they're isolated - Iran hasn't transferred funds as it's cross wit
h them for failing to support Assad in Syria. The Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood -
Hamas' ally and organization from which it originated - is a rival to the curren
t Egyptian government, has been declared illegal and has gone underground. Many
of its leaders have been jailed.
Under normal circumstances during a conflict with Israel, Hamas could count on p
ressure from Hezballah on Israels northern border, but this time around Hezballah
is spread too thin in efforts to help prop up President Assad in Syria and fend
ing off the threat from ISIS (or IS, or whatever they are now), whose presence h
as finally begun to be felt in Beirut. Imagine Hezballah as the moderate fending
off a threat from a more extreme Islamic group!
Hamas' decision to launch rockets from Gaza might be a last ditch effort to show
the world that it's the only real resistance to 'the Zionist entity'. In that r
espect, it still enjoys wide-spread support on the Arab street, from what I've s
een. So it's an attempt to gain support, increase relevancy, and (as I saw one j
ournalist put it) 'reshuffle the deck' to perhaps stave off its own coming demis
e. I've also read that the reconciliation agreement itself was also a last ditch
attempt to stave off its own demise.
In fact, they don't really have any options besides portraying themselves as 'th
e resistance'. Friendless and penniless, they're in a corner. In a very real sen
se, all they've got left is their rockets in the basement.
This lack of options, and their lack of anything resembling any sort of 'victory
' in the current fighting, explains their rejection of Mondays ceasefire - accept
ing it would simply validate the idea that they led Gazans to another costly, mi
serable war with nothing to show for it - a complete surrender, essentially. Tha
t would not likely help their position, already perilous, in the months to come.

On the other hand, if Hamas can lure Israelis into more strikes and even a groun
d assault, it might be able to paint Israel in the 'best' negative light by play
ing up Gazan casualties.
In this regard we can be sure: Hamas wants as many Gazan deaths as possible, the
more the merrier, as it's the only way they can hope to gain a victory: by swin
ging the international narrative towards Gaza as poor and repressed and Israel a
s mighty and terrible and murderous -- even as they domestically try and bolster
resistance by saying that all Gazans welcome death and martyrdom.
It's worth noting the absurdity here: Israel has an incentive to limit casualtie
s for moral reasons. In fact, as an article in Business Insider last week sugges
ted, Israel has raised moral standards in its efforts to warn civilians of impen
ding attacks.
Israel also wants to minimize casualties because of the PR war - Israel needs as
few deaths in Gaza as possible while Hamas needs as many as possible.
The Israel Defence Force's activity on Twitter is putting a lot of energy into s
howing how it is protecting civilian life in Gaza. Meanwhile, Hamas is playing u
p the body count, asking civilians to go to rooftops when air strikes are incomi
ng, as well as asking civilians to ignore Israeli pamphlets requesting that they
flee their homes for their own safety.
Perversely, Israel's incredible Iron Dome missile defense system, which has most
ly keep Israelis safe, makes it easier for Hamas to promote its own version of t
he conflict.
Here's another example, just to demonstrate the absurdity of the whole situation
.
Israel supplies Gaza with power - to run its sewage plants and provide fresh wat
er, for example. A couple of days ago Hamas hit the infrastructure with a rocket
, knocking out their own power supply.
This is potentially useful PR for Hamas as it increases the likelihood of Gazan
misery being portrayed internationally - so of course Israel has had to work, un
der rocket fire, to restore electricity to the people firing the rockets at them
!
Anyway, the long and short of it is that it's a complex mess. In general terms,
Israel is playing chess while Hamas is playing checkers.
The fact remains that Hamas frequently violates Israeli sovereignty. It's also v
ery important to note that, despite the unbalanced nature of the conflict, Hamas
has had the better part of nine years to concentrate on building a better home
and future for Gazans. Instead they've used that time and energy into stockpilin
g and firing rockets -- most of the rocket fire over the years never makes inter
national media.
All of this rocket firing is based on Hamas' delusion that it might sweep the Je
ws into the sea and wipe Israel from the map.
Contrast this to the Iraqi Kurds, for example, who have quietly built the functi
oning infrastructure of a state-within-a-state over the years while consciously
never engaging in terrorism. Today, Kurdistan is on the cusp of independence.
Gaza would be far better off if they concentrated on building their state and lo
oking after the well-being of their people - not armed resistance. While the bom
bs come from Israel, Gazan misery is due to Gaza's rulers.
Adam Taylor is a writer and analyst living in Israel. He writes about politics,
finance and economics of Israel and the Middle East. He can be reached at: thede
sertprince@gmail.com and on Twitter : @grayzies