Component manufacturing corporation (cmc) has an all-common-equity capital structure. It has 200000 shares of!2 par "alue common stoc# outstan$ing. If the e'isting 20. $i"i$e$ payout &ere continue$ retaine$ earnings &oul$ e!12 million in 200ut as note$ in"estments that yiel$ the 1(. Cost of capital &
Component manufacturing corporation (cmc) has an all-common-equity capital structure. It has 200000 shares of!2 par "alue common stoc# outstan$ing. If the e'isting 20. $i"i$e$ payout &ere continue$ retaine$ earnings &oul$ e!12 million in 200ut as note$ in"estments that yiel$ the 1(. Cost of capital &
Component manufacturing corporation (cmc) has an all-common-equity capital structure. It has 200000 shares of!2 par "alue common stoc# outstan$ing. If the e'isting 20. $i"i$e$ payout &ere continue$ retaine$ earnings &oul$ e!12 million in 200ut as note$ in"estments that yiel$ the 1(. Cost of capital &
(ST-1) component manufacturing corporation (CMC) has an all-common-equity
capital structure. It has 200000 shares of !2 par "alue common stoc# outstan$ing. %hen CMCs foun$ers &ho &as also its research $irector an$ most successful in"entor retire$ une'pect#y to the south pacific in late 200( cmc &as left su$$enly an$ permenantly &ith materially lo&er gro&th e'pectations an$ relati"ely fe& attracti"e ne& in"estment opportunities. )nfortunately there &as no &ay to repace the foun$ers contri*ution to the firm. +re"iously CMC foun$ it necessary to plo& *ac# most of its earning to finance gro&th &hich a"erage$ 12 percent per year. ,uture gro&th at a -. rate is consi$ere$ realistic *ut that le"el &oul$ call for an increase in the $i"i$en$ payout. ,urther it no& appears that ne& in"estment pro/ects &ith at least the 1( . rate of return require$ *y CMCs stoc#hol$ers (r s 01(.) &oul$ amount to only !100000 for 200- in comparison to a pro/ecte$ ! 2000000 of net income. If the e'isting 20. $i"i$e$ payout &ere continue$ retaine$ earnings &oul$ *e !12 million in 200- *ut as note$ in"estments that yiel$ the 1( . cost of capital &oul$ amount to only !100000. The one encouraging thing is that the high earnings from e'isting assets are e'pecte$ to continue an$ net income of !2 million is still e'pecte$ for 200-. gi"en the $ramatically change$ circumstances CMCs management is re"ie&ing the firms $i"i$en$ policy. a. assuming that the accepta*le 200- in"estment pro/ects &oul$ *e finance$ entirely *y earnings retaine$ $uring the year calculate 3+S in 200- assuming that CMC uses the resi$ual $istri*ution mo$el an$ pays all $istri*utions in the form of $i"i$en$s. *. %hat payout ratio $oes your ans&er to part a imply for 200-4 c. If a 20. payout ratio is maintaine$ for the foressea*le future &hat is your estimate of the present mar#et price of the common stoc#4 5o& $oes this compare &ith the mar#et proce that shoul$ ha"e pre"aile$ un$er the assumption e'isting /ust *efore the ne&s a*out the foun$ers retirement4 If the t&o "alues of + o are $ifferent comment on &hy. Solution (ST-1) a. pro/ecte$ net income !2000000 less pro/ecte$ capital in"estment 100000 a"aila*le resi$ual !1200000 shares outstan$ing 200000 3+S0 !12000006200000 shares 0 !2 0 3 1 *. 78S0!20000006200000 shares 0 !10. +ayout ratio 0 3+S67+S 0 !26!10 0 20. c. currently + o 0 3 1 6(r s -g) 0 !26(0.1(-0.0-) 0 !260.09 0 !22.2: un$er the former circumstances 3 1 &oul$ *e *ase$ on a 20. payout on !10 7+S or !2. &ith r s 0 1(. an$ g0 12. &e sol"e foe + o ; + o 0 3 1 6(r s -g) 0 !26(0.1(-0.12) 0 !260.02 0 !100 <lthough CMC has suffere$ a se"ere set*ac# its e'isting assets &ill continue to pro"i$e a goo$ income stream. More of these earnings shoul$ no& *e passe$ on to the sharehol$ers as the slo&e$ internal gro&th has re$uce$ the nee$ for fun$s. 5o&e"er the net result is a ==. $ecrease in the "alue of the shares. (11-1) a'el telecommunications has a target capital structure that consists of :0 . $ept an$ =0. equity. The company anticipates that its capital *u$get for the upcoming year &ill *e !=000000. if <'el reports net income of !2000000 an$ it follo&s a resi$ual $istri*ution mo$el &ith all $istri*utions as $i"i$en$s &hat &ill *e its $i"i$en$ payout ratio4 :0. 3e*t> =0. 7quity> Capital 8u$get 0 !=000000> ?I 0 !2000000> +@ 0 4 7quity retaine$ 0 0.=(!=000000) 0 !900000. ?I !2000000 -<$$itions 900000 7arnings Aemaining !1100000 +ayout 0 000 000 2 ! 000 100 1 ! 0 --.. (11-2) Bamma Me$icals stoc# tra$es at !90 a share. The company is contemplating a =-for-2 stoc# split. <ssuming that the stoc# split &ill ha"e no effect on the total mar#et "alue of its equity &hat &ill *e the companys stoc# price follo&ing the stoc# split4 + 0 0 !90> Split 0 = for 2> ?e& + 0 0 4 + 0 ?e& 0 2 6 = 90 ! 0 !20. (11-=) northern pacific heating an$ cooling Inc. has a 2 month *ac#log of or$ers for its patente$ solar heating system. To meet this $eman$ management plans to e'pan$ pro$uction capacity *y (0. &ith a !10 million in"estment in plant an$ machinery. The firm &ants to maintain a (0. $ept-to-total-assets ratio in its capital structure it also &ants to maintain its past $i"i$en$ policy of $istri*uting (-. of last year net income. In 200( net income &as !- million. 5o& much e'ternal equity must northern pacific see# at the *eginning of 200- to e'pan$ capacity as $esire$4 Aetaine$ earnings 0 ?et income (1 - +ayout ratio) 0 !-000000(0.--) 0 !2:-0000. 7'ternal equity nee$e$; Total equity require$ 0 (?e& in"estment)(1 - 3e*t ratio) 0 !10000000(0.20) 0 !2000000. ?e& e'ternal equity nee$e$ 0 !2000000 - !2:-0000 0 !=2-0000. (11-() +etersen company has a capital *u$get of !1.2 million. The company &ants to maintain a target capital structure &hich is 20. $ept an$ (0. equity the company forecasts that its net income this year &ill *e !200000. if the company follo&s a resi$ual $istri*ution mo$el an$ pays all $istri*utions as $i"i$en$s &hat &ill *e its payout ratio4 The company requires 0.(0(!1200000) 0 !(10000 of equity financing. If the company follo&s a resi$ual $i"i$en$ policy it &ill retain !(10000 for its capital *u$get an$ pay out the !120000 Cresi$ualD to its sharehol$ers as a $i"i$en$. The payout ratio &oul$ therefore *e !1200006!200000 0 0.20 0 20.. (18-5) the wei corporation expects next year net income to be $15 million. The firm's debt ratio is crrently !"#. $ei has $1% million of profitable in&estment opportnities' and it wishes to maintain its existin( debt ratio. )ccordin( to the residal distribtion model (assmin( all payments are in the form of di&idends)' how lar(e shold weis di&idend payot ratio be next year* 7quity financing 0 !12000000(0.20) 0 !:200000. 3i"i$en$s 0 ?et income - 7quity financing 0 !1-000000 - !:200000 0 !:100000. 3i"i$en$ payout ratio 0 3i"i$en$s6?et income 0 !:1000006!1-000000 0 -2.. (18-+) after a 5-for-1 stoc, split' the -trasbr( company paid a di&idend of $"..5 per new share' which represent a /# increase o&er last years pre-split di&idend . $hat was last year di&idend per share* 11-2 3+S after split 0 !0.:-. 7qui"alent pre-split $i"i$en$ 0 !0.:-(-) 0 !=.:-. ?e& equi"alent $i"i$en$ 0 East yearFs $i"i$en$(1.09) !=.:- 0 East yearFs $i"i$en$(1.09) East yearFs $i"i$en$ 0 !=.:-61.09 0 !=.((. (18-.) the $elch company is considerin( three independent pro0ects' each of which re1ires a $5 million in&estment. The estimated internal rate of retrn (233) and cost of capital for these pro0ects are presented below4 5ro0ect 6 (hi(h ris,) cost of capital 7 1+#8 2337%"# 5ro0ect 9 (medim ris,) cost of capital 7 1%#8 23371"# 5ro0ect : (low ris,) cost of capital 7 8#8 2337/# ;ote that the pro0ects cost of capital &aries becase the pro0ects ha&e different le&els of ris,s. The company's optimal capital strctre calls for 5"# debt and 5"# common e1ity. $elch expects to ha&e net income of $.'%8.'5"". 2f $elch bases its di&idends on the residal model (all distribtion are in the form of di&idends)' what will its payot ratio be* 11-: Capital *u$get shoul$ *e !10 million. %e #no& that -0. of the !10 million shoul$ *e equity. Therefore the company shoul$ pay $i"i$en$s of; 3i"i$en$s 0 ?et income - nee$e$ equity 0 !:21:-00 - !-000000 0 !221:-00. +ayout ratio 0 !221:-006!:21:-00 0 0.=1=9 0 =1.=9..
2006 Consensus Agreement On The Design and Conduct of Clinical Studies With Low-Level Laser Therapy and Light Therapy For Musculoskeletal Pain and Disorders
Rayya Abdallah David Abdallah, As Next of Kin of Baby Boy Abdallah, and On Their Own Personal Behalf v. Wilbur Callender, M.D. Government of The Virgin Islands, 1 F.3d 141, 3rd Cir. (1993)