This paper identifies important faults and their performance impacts for rooftop air conditioners. The frequencies of occurrence and the relative costs of service for different faults were estimated. Fault testing led to a set of generic rules for the impacts of faults on measurements.
This paper identifies important faults and their performance impacts for rooftop air conditioners. The frequencies of occurrence and the relative costs of service for different faults were estimated. Fault testing led to a set of generic rules for the impacts of faults on measurements.
This paper identifies important faults and their performance impacts for rooftop air conditioners. The frequencies of occurrence and the relative costs of service for different faults were estimated. Fault testing led to a set of generic rules for the impacts of faults on measurements.
303 Common Faults and Their Impacts for Rooftop Air Conditioners Mark S. Breuker James E. Braun, Ph.D., P.E. Associate Member ASHRAE Member ASHRAE This paper identifies important faults and their performance impacts for rooftop air conditioners. The frequencies of occurrence and the relative costs of service for different faults were estimated through analysis of service records. Several of the important and difficult to diagnose refrigera- tion cycle faults were simulated in the laboratory. Also, the impacts on several performance indi- ces were quantified through transient testing for a range of conditions and fault levels. The transient test results indicated that fault detection and diagnostics could be performed using methods that incorporate steady-state assumptions and models. Furthermore, the fault testing led to a set of generic rules for the impacts of faults on measurements that could be used for fault diag- noses. The average impacts of the faults on cooling capacity and coefficient of performance (COP) were also evaluated. Based upon the results, all of the faults are significant at the levels introduced, and should be detected and diagnosed by an FDD system. The data set obtained dur- ing this work was very comprehensive, and was used to design and evaluate the performance of an FDD method (Breuker 1997a) that will be reported in a future paper. INTRODUCTION As the cost of hardware (e.g., sensors, microprocessors) goes down, interest in automated fault detection and diagnostics (FDD) for vapor compression grows. One of the first steps in developing an FDD system is to identify the most important faults that should be considered. The only publication found to have addressed causes of failure for air conditioning equipment was presented by Stouppe and Lau (1989). In it, the authors summarized the cause of 15,716 failures that led to insurance claims in HVAC&R equipment over an eight-year period from 19801987. Of the failures in hermetic air conditioning units, 76% were attributed to electrical components, 19% to mechanical components, and 5% to items in the refrigeration circuit. Of the electrical failures, almost 87% were failures in the motor windings. The primary causes given for motor failure were deterioration of the insulation, unbalanced or single-phase operation, short cycling, and refrigerant contamination. The mechanical failures were almost all in the compressor valves, bearings, or connecting rods. The primary reasons given for these failures were general fatigue in the valves and valve springs, liquid slugging, and loss of lubrication. Stouppe and Lau (1989) did not report any repair costs, nor did they attempt to identify operat- ing conditions or other faults that may lead to premature failures. Once the important faults are specified, the FDD development process typically involves arti- ficially introducing these faults and measuring their impacts on measurements used by the FDD algorithm for detection and diagnosis. For the most part, the methods that have been developed for on-line FDD involve the use of thermodynamic measurements to detect and diagnose faults that degrade system cooling capacity and efficiency and impact equipment life. Methods based upon thermodynamic measurements have been documented by McKellar (1987), Stallard Mark Breuker is a project engineer with DukeSolutions in Indianapolis, Indiana. He was a graduate research assistant in the School of Mechanical Engineering, Purdue University, where James E. Braun is an associate professor. TABLE OF CONTENTS VOLUME 4, NUMBER 3, JULY 1998 304 (1989), Yoshimua and Noboru (1989), Kumamaru et al. (1991), Wagner and Shoureshi (1992), Hiroshi et al. (1992), Grimmelius et al. (1995), Stylianou and Nikanpour (1996), and Rossi and Braun (1997). The faults considered include compressor valve leakage, heat exchanger fan fail- ures, evaporator frosting, condenser fouling, evaporator air filter fouling, liquid line restriction, and refrigerant leakage. Typically, temperature and pressure measurements have been consid- ered because of their relatively low cost. A few studies have addressed the effects of faults on overall air-conditioning system perfor- mance. Bultman et al. (1993) showed a 7.6% decrease in system COP for a 40% reduction in air- flow for an air conditioner. Krafthefer et al. (1987) estimated a 10-13% decrease in COP for typical evaporator filter fouling of a heat pump. Furthermore, they estimated operating cost sav- ings of 10-25% through use of a high efficiency air filter upstream of the evaporator. Rossi and Braun (1996) compared the combined service and energy costs associated with optimal mainte- nance scheduling for cleaning of condensers and evaporator air filters for rooftop air condition- ers. They estimated total cost savings between 5 and 15%. None of the previous studies systematically evaluated the impact of different fault levels on system measurements over a wide range of operating conditions and with typical dynamics. As a result, the data are not useful in quantifying the robustness of FDD methods. In contrast, the work associated with this paper focused on rooftop air conditioners and had two goals: (1) to identify the important faults to include in an automated FDD system and, (2) to develop fault-free and faulty data that could be used to evaluate and optimize the performance of FDD methods. For the first goal, a database of service records was analyzed from an HVAC service company that focuses on equipment for large commercial chain stores. Most of the stores use direct expansion rooftop air conditioning units to meet their air conditioning needs. The faults were analyzed in terms of both frequency of occurrence and total cost of repairs. For the second goal, transient operation of a rooftop air conditioner was simulated in the laboratory. Fault lev- els, load levels, and ambient conditions were all varied during testing and a large database of measurements was generated. These data were used to design and evaluate the performance of an FDD method that will be reported in a future paper. More detailed documentation of the work presented in this paper is given by Breuker (1997a, 1997b). Survey of Common Faults A database was analyzed from a service company that primarily services rooftop air condi- tioners for stores. The database contains over 6000 separate fault cases from 1989 to 1995. Both frequency of occurrence and total cost of repair for different faults were estimated using a statis- tically representative subset of the data. Frequency of occurrence information helps to expose the nuisance faults, those faults that are not expensive to fix, but cause a periodic loss of com- fort and frequent visits from service technicians. Total cost of repair data targets those faults that are dominating service costs and should be included in an FDD system. For frequently occurring faults, an FDD system could provide quick diagnoses and allow on-site personnel to provide repairs. Furthermore, the FDD system could detect and prevent operating conditions or second- ary faults that lead to expensive failures. Table 1 shows the frequency of occurrence of faults that led to inadequate building comfort, which is termed No Air Conditioning by service personnel. For this classification of faults, approximately 40% of the failures were electrical or controls related and the other 60% were mechanical. However, motor failures were classified with the equipment that they power (e.g., condenser motor fans with condenser). If motor failures are reclassified under the Electrical Problem category, electrical and control failures accounted for about 60% of the failures, while mechanical problems accounted for 40%. 305 HVAC&R RESEARCH Table 1. Classification of No Air Conditioning Cases Causes for No Air Conditioning Service Call % Total Occurrences Controls error 21% Electrical problem 20% Refrigerant leak 12% Condenser 7% Air handling 7% Evaporator 6% Compressor 5% Cooling water loop 4% Plugged filters 2% Personnel error 2% Expansion device 2% Cant classify 12% Table 2. Classification of Fault Types by Total Cost General Classification of Faults % Total Occurrences Compressor 24% Controls 10% Condenser 9% Electrical 7% Evaporator 6% New installation 6% Air handling 5% Refrigerant leak 5% Installation/start-up 4% Cooling water loop 4% Fan belt 2% Others 18% Table 2 shows the total service costs associated with repairs as a percentage of the total costs of service provided for different faults. Although compressor failures do not occur as frequently as other faults, they are by far the most costly failure for unitary air conditioners. Both the labor and component costs are high for replacing compressors. The costs associated with controls and electrical faults are also high due to the high frequency of repair. The combined refrigeration cycle faults (condenser, evaporator, air handling, and refrigerant leakage) account for approxi- mately 25% of the costs. Aside from costs, refrigerant leakage is an environmental concern and detection could eventually be mandated for unitary equipment. Table 3 gives a cost breakdown of the diagnoses associated with compressor faults. Approxi- mately 70% of the classified faults were associated with motor problems. Another important fault termed internal bypass/inefficient refers to a loss in compressor capacity due to compres- sor valve leakage or other leakage paths. This type of fault causes a degradation in performance that is not typically detected until comfort is compromised. The causes that lead to compressor failures were analyzed through personal interactions with industrialists who are involved in reliability and repair (Megrue 1995, Janaushek 1995). It was found that although most failures in hermetic compressors are diagnosed as a failure in the motor, these failures are usually the result of a mechanical problem that has overloaded the motor. Furthermore, the primary cause of mechanical failures in positive displacement compres- sors is liquid refrigerant in the compressor. The presence of liquid in the compression chamber can result in damage to valves, rods, and pistons. Also, if liquid refrigerant is held in the compressor during startup (i.e. flooded start), oil may be carried out of the compressor shell, resulting in a temporary loss of lubrication until the oil completes the refrigeration circuit and returns to the compressor. Cool mornings, which occur in the spring and fall, cause liquid refrigerant to pool in the compressor, resulting in a flooded start. Continuous liquid floodback caused by a lack of suction superheat also cools the compressor body. When the system shuts down, the liquid refrigerant collects in the cool com- pressor shell, resulting in a flooded start when the system is restarted again. Because many air conditioners operate with on-off control, a system could go through a number of flooded starts in a day if liquid floodback is present. Some causes of liquid floodback are fouled evaporator coils, fouled condenser coils, refrigerant overcharge, and a faulty TXV. VOLUME 4, NUMBER 3, JULY 1998 306 Table 3. Compressor Fault Cost Breakdown Description of Compressor Fault % of Total Category Cost Short to ground 25% Open windings 17% Locked rotor 16% Broken compressor internals 11% Internal bypass/inefficient 8% Other replacements 19% Other nonreplacement problems 4% Table 4. Condenser Fault Cost Breakdown Description of Condenser Fault % of Total Category Cost Defective fan motor 50% Fouling 30% Fan cycle control installation 6% Incorrect initial installation 5% Fouling-comfort problem 5% Leak/rupture of coil 3% Fan belt replacement 1% Table 5. Evaporator Fault Cost Breakdown Description of Evaporator Fault % of Total Category Cost Fouling 61% Coil rupture/damage 25% Fouling-comfort problem 14% Table 6. Air-Handling Fault Cost Breakdown Description of Air Handling Fault % of Total Category Cost Blower motor replacement 38% Fan replacement 14% Loose/leaking air ducts 12% Electrical problems 10% Outside air damper motor 8% Mechanical control problem 7% Cant classify 6% Blower belt replacement 5% Other conditions which lead to early compressor failure include high compressor tempera- tures and electrical supply problems, such as low voltage and voltage spikes. High compressor temperatures may be caused by the following: condenser fan failure, condenser fouling, liquid line restriction, or low refrigerant charge. Tables 4 through 6 give a cost breakdown for faults associated with the condenser, evapora- tor, and air handler categories of Table 2. These data indicate that fouling and fan motor failures are the most important faults for the heat exchangers. Most of the service related to fouling was specified while the service technician visited the equipment for other reasons. It should be noted that only 18% of evaporator fouling and 14% of condenser fouling faults resulted in a loss of comfort within the buildings. Of the faults analyzed, Table 1 showed that those related to controls occurred most fre- quently. However, Table 7 indicates that many of the control problems were simple and inex- pensive to fix, such as the reprogramming of a thermostat. Table 8 shows that electrical faults were dominated by more expensive replacements such as the need to replace a contactor or another damaged electrical component. Fault Detection and Diagnostics Faults for vapor compression systems can be divided into two categories: (1) hard failures that occur abruptly and either cause the system to stop functioning or not meet comfort condi- tions and (2) soft faults that cause a degradation in performance but allow continued operation of the system. Many of the most frequently occurring and expensive faults are associated with service in response to hard failures, such as compressor and electrical faults. Certainly, an auto- mated FDD system should be able to diagnose hard faults. However, these faults are typically 307 HVAC&R RESEARCH Table 7. Control Fault Cost Breakdown Description of Control Fault % of Total Category Cost Recalibrate/reset thermostat 24% General controls malfunction 20% Replace thermostat 19% Compressor safety switches 17% Controls design problem 9% Low pressure control 7% Other 4% Table 8. Electrical Fault Cost Breakdown Description of Control Fault % of Total Category Cost Replace Contactor 40% Damaged Component 27% Wiring Failure/Short 13% Blown Fuses 8% Reset Breaker 6% Poor Connection 4% Other 2% easy to detect and diagnose using inexpensive measurements. For instance, a compressor failure leads to a complete loss of refrigerant flow and can be easily diagnosed by monitoring the tem- peratures or pressures at the inlet and outlet of the compressor. Similarly, a fan motor failure could be diagnosed by measuring temperatures or pressures at the inlets and outlets of the heat exchangers (evaporator or condenser) that they serve. Other hard faults that should probably be included within an FDD system include common controls failures, blown fuses, and malfunc- tioning electrical components such as contactors. It would also be important to detect dangerous operating conditions, such as the possibility of flooded starts that lead to hard failures. Soft faults, such as a slow loss of refrigerant or fouling of a heat exchanger, are more difficult to detect and diagnose. Yet they are significant, often leading to premature failure of compo- nents, a loss in comfort, or excessive energy consumption. These types of faults are the focus of the remainder of this paper, and of a future paper that will evaluate the performance of an FDD system. See also Breuker (1997a). In these studies, five faults were considered: (1) refrigerant leakage, (2) condenser fouling, (3) evaporator filter fouling, (4) a liquid-line restriction, and (5) compressor valve leakage. In each case, faults were simulated in the laboratory and the impacts on several measurements and performance indices were quantified. The next section describes experimental testing procedures and the methods used to simulate and characterize the levels of these five faults. Then, results of the transient testing and the primary impacts of the faults on system performance are presented. Experimental Testing The air conditioner that was used for experimental testing was a three-ton (10 kW) packaged rooftop unit that was documented by Rossi and Braun (1997). It had a constant speed, hermeti- cally-sealed, reciprocating compressor with on/off control and used fixed-orifice type expansion devices for refrigerant flow control. When operating normally, the airflows across both the evaporator and condenser were constant. Uniform condenser fouling was simulated in the experiments by blocking the condenser coil with uniformly spaced, vertical strips of paper. This type of fouling is representative of a build-up of debris on the face of the condenser coil, in that it causes a net loss of condenser sur- face area available for heat transfer and reduces the total mass flow rate of air across the coil. For presentation of results, the level of fouling is expressed as a total percentage reduction in the surface area of the condenser coil. Evaporator fouling is generally the result of a plugged air filter or a blocked return air vent, both of which cause a decrease in the flow of air over the evaporator coil. In this study, evapora- tor fouling was simulated by reducing the speed of a variable-speed fan used within an airflow measurement system. Fouling is indicated by a reduction in airflow rate measured as a percent- age of the nominal flow. VOLUME 4, NUMBER 3, JULY 1998 308 A liquid-line restriction can be caused by a plugged filter/dryer or some debris lodged in the fixed orifice expansion device. In either case, it results in an increased pressure drop in the liq- uid line. It was simulated in the experiments by partially closing a globe valve placed in the liq- uid line. The level of fault was characterized as (1) where P res is the pressure drop across the restriction and P sys is the difference between high side (condensing) and low side (evaporating) pressures in the system prior to the introduction of the restriction. Compressor valves can become damaged when slugs of liquid refrigerant enter the compres- sor. The valves may then lose an effective seal, such that high pressure refrigerant in the com- pression cylinder leaks back into the suction line across the suction valve, or discharged gas leaks back into the cylinder across the discharge valve. Leakage across either valve results in a reduction in the volumetric efficiency of the compressor. Compressor valve leakage was simu- lated in the experiments by using a bypass valve that allows gas from the discharge line to recy- cle into the suction line. The percentage reduction in the net volumetric efficiency of the compressor was used to characterize the fault level and calculated using the known compressor specifications, the inlet refrigerant state, and the mass flow measurement. Refrigerant leakage is simply the loss of refrigerant from the system. This was simulated by discharging a fixed amount of refrigerant from the rooftop unit into a receiving vessel and weighing the vessel before and after the discharge. The level of refrigerant leakage was charac- terized as the percentage reduction in the total charge in the system. In this study, nine temperatures and one relative humidity were measured and used in charac- terizing the fault impacts. These measurements are depicted in Figure 1. Three of these measure- ments characterize the inputs that affect the operating states of the unit: the temperature of the ambient air entering the condenser coil T amb , the temperature of the return air entering the evap- orator coil T ra , and the relative humidity ra or wet-bulb temperature T wb of the return air. In a simple rooftop air-conditioning unit (on/off compressor control, fixed speed fans) operating nor- mally, all of the system operating states are primarily functions of these three driving conditions. The operating state measurements used to characterize the impact of faults in this study are as Restriction level 100% P res P sys -------------- = Figure 1. Vapor compression system with measurements Condenser Evaporator T sh T hg T cond T sc T evap T cao T eao, T wbo T amb T ra , T wb 309 HVAC&R RESEARCH follows: (1) evaporating temperature T evap , (2) suction line superheat T sh , (3) condensing tem- perature T cond , (4) liquid line subcooling T sc , (5) hot gas line or compressor outlet temperature T hg , (6) air temperature rise across the condenser T ca = T cao T amb , and (7) air temperature drop across the evaporator T ea = T eao T ra . In addition, measurements of refrigerant pressures, refrigerant mass flow, and evaporator air mass flow were necessary to characterize the fault lev- els as previously described. Furthermore, the impacts of faults on system cooling capacity and coefficient of performance were also evaluated, so that compressor power measurements were necessary. Air-side temperatures were measured with 1000 Platinum RTDs. The accuracy of these devices is within 1 , or 0.26C (Rossi 1995). Temperatures in the vapor compressor cycle were measured using K-type thermocouples. The accuracy of the thermocouples when measured with the data acquisition system is within 0.5C (Rossi 1995). These thermocouples were soldered onto the copper refrigerant piping and wrapped with aluminum foil and insulation. Condensing temperatures and evaporating temperatures were taken at return bend locations in the two-phase region of the condenser and evaporator coils. Relative humidity was measured using a duct-mounted capacitive polymer humidity sensor with an accuracy of 3% relative humidity in the range of conditions considered in these tests. Refrigerant mass flow rate was measured using a coriolis-type flow sensor. After calibration, the accuracy of the sensor was 0.4% of full scale. The air mass flow rate across the evaporator of the air conditioning test unit was measured using an air measurement system with nozzles hav- ing known flow characteristics as outlined in ASHRAE Standard 41.2. Refrigerant pressures were measured using pressure transducers. After calibration, the low-side pressure transducers have a rated accuracy of 1% of full scale (0100 psig) or 1 psi (7 kPa), whereas the high-side pressure sensors have an accuracy of 0.5% of full scale (0500 psig) or 2.5 psi (17 kPa). Com- pressor electric power consumption was measured using a precision, AC watt transducer with an output between 0 and 16 kW. The device was factory-calibrated, and accurate within 32 W. Transient tests were performed in environmental chambers that could simulate indoor and outdoor conditions. The transient tests were designed to provide data to fully test FDD tech- niques under realistic conditions where the unit was cycling on and off to meet a building load. The transients for a rooftop air conditioner with on/off cycling are due to changing indoor and outdoor driving conditions, and to system startup and shutdown. In the transient testing, the rate of change of the ambient temperature was negligible when compared to the other transients and was not considered. The most important transient to consider in an FDD method is due to start-up. Figure 2 shows a typical transient profile for indoor temperature and the associated compressor outlet temperature under controlled conditions with on/off cycling. After the unit turns on, the indoor temperature is cooled from an upper setpoint to a lower setpoint through a deadband. During this time, the hot gas temperature increases, due to power input to the com- pressor. Although this refrigerant state never reaches a true steady state due to the changing room temperature, it is nearly at steady state 10 minutes after startup. The hot gas temperature takes the longest of the refrigerant states to reach steady state because of the mass associated with the compressor body and oil. When the room temperature is cooled to the lower setpoint, the unit turns off, the room temperature floats to the upper setpoint, and the hot gas temperature cools down. The mass of air in the environmental chambers used in this study was much smaller than a typical building served by this rooftop unit. Consequently, direct control of the load in the environmental test chamber would not provide the correct transient response at part-load conditions. Instead, the temperature profile in the room was controlled to behave as if the rooftop unit were cooling a much larger room. A cycle time of 45 minutes, an upper setpoint of 76F (24.4C), and a deadband of 2F (1 K) were selected as representative values for commercial cooling applications. Although the VOLUME 4, NUMBER 3, JULY 1998 310 temperature was changed from approximately 76 to 74F (24.4 to 23.3C) during each transient cycle, the relative humidity set point was held constant at 42%. The room temperature/relative humidity combination lies in the center of the ASHRAE comfort zone (ASHRAE 1993). The por- tion of the total cycle time (45 minutes) in which the rooftop unit provided cooling was varied to simulate part-load conditions. For example at 20% load, the unit ran for 9 minutes and was off for 36 minutes. Two consecutive transient start-up responses were generated and data were recorded at 5-second intervals at each of the conditions and fault levels. Measurements from the second tran- sient were used to evaluate the impact of faults on performance. Four distinct load/ambient conditions were used for the transient tests. Heat gains in the test chamber were simulated at levels of 20, 40, 60, and 80% of the rooftop air-conditioning unit's total cooling capacity. The ambient temperature was increased with load levels, as given in Table 9. At each of the building load levels, faults were introduced into the test unit at four to five distinct levels, as summarized in Table 10. The maximum fault levels in Table 10 corre- spond to twice the levels that were detectable during steady-state tests using the FDD method evaluated by Breuker (1997a). Transient Test Results A total of 96 transient tests were performed for the rooftop air conditioner [(4 load levels) (24 fault levels)]. The impacts of the faults on the transient profiles of nine performance indices (seven temperatures, power consumption, and cooling capacity) were then evaluated for each test. Transient profiles for all of the performance indices were presented by Breuker (1997b). Figures 3 through 11 show a sample (i.e., 5%) of these profiles. These figures show the impact of the level of refrigerant leakage on transient responses for the nine performance indices at a 20% load level. One observation that pertains to all of the profiles is that the indices all approached steady state before about 200 seconds. Thus, even at the lowest load level, fault detection and diagnos- tics could be performed using methods that incorporate steady-state assumptions and models. The measurements with the slowest transients were T ca, T ea , T hg , and T sh . Some of the indices Figure 2. Transient rooftop air condition operation Rooftop Unit Hot Gas Temp vs. Time, Load at 70% Unit Capacity 40 50 60 70 80 90 047 1 1 1 4 1 8 2 2 2 5 2 9 3 2 3 6 4 0 4 3 4 7 5 0 5 4 5 8 6 1 6 5 6 8 7 2 7 6 7 9 8 3 8 6 9 0 9 4 9 7 1 0 1 1 0 4 1 0 8 1 1 2 1 1 5 1 1 9 Ti me (mi n) T h g
( C ) Return Air Temperature vs. Time, 70% Load, 2 C Deadband 21.5 22 22.5 23 23.5 24 24.5 048 1 2 1 6 2 0 2 4 2 8 3 2 3 6 4 0 4 4 4 8 5 2 5 6 6 0 6 4 6 8 7 2 7 6 8 0 8 4 8 8 9 2 9 6 1 0 0 1 0 4 1 0 8 1 1 2 1 1 6 1 1 9 Ti me (mi n) T r a
( C ) 311 HVAC&R RESEARCH (e.g., T sh and cooling capacity) showed a slow downward trend after the initial fast transient. This was due to the cool-down of the return air (T ra ) as the room temperature moved through its deadband. The transient for hot gas temperature would probably have been slower if the indoor temperature had not been decreasing. The hot gas temperature, condensing temperature, cooling capacity, and air temperature dif- ferences appeared to have first-order dynamics in response to the on/off cycling of the unit. The hot gas temperature was relatively slow to respond because of the large energy storage associ- ated with the compressor body, motor, and oil. The condensing temperature followed a similar trend, indicating a relatively slow buildup of the condensing pressure. The first-order dynamics of the air-side cooling capacity and air temperature differences suggest that energy storage within the heat exchanger materials is important. The evaporation temperature, suction super- heat, condenser subcooling, and the compressor power consumption exhibited higher-order dynamic behavior. This behavior was undoubtedly due to transients associated with migration of mass in the system. Table 9. Outdoor Room Temperatures at Selected Load Levels Load Level Ambient Temp., F (C) 20% 65 (18.3) 40% 73 (22.8) 60% 80 (26.7) 80% 87 (30.6) Table 10. Fault Levels Introduced To Test Unit at Each Load/Ambient Level Fault Fault Levels, % Refrigerant leakage (% reduction in mass of charge) 0, 3.5, 7, 10.5, 14 Liquid line restriction (% of system pressure drop) 0, 5, 10, 15, 20 Compressor valve leakage (% reduction in volumetric efficiency) 0, 7, 14, 21, 28 Condenser fouling (% blockage of face area) 0, 14, 28, 42, 56 Evaporator fouling (% loss of airflow rate) 0, 12, 24, 36 Figure 3. T evap startup transients with decreasing refrigerant charge VOLUME 4, NUMBER 3, JULY 1998 312 Figures 3 through 11 also show the impact of the faults on the transient profiles. As each fault became progressively worse, the performance indices increasingly deviated from the no-fault case. Many FDD methods use differences between measured states and expected states for nor- mal operation as inputs for both fault detection and diagnosis. For this purpose, it is important that the noise associated with the measured states be small compared to the magnitude of changes due to the operating fault. This was found to be the case for all output measurements and faults, except for the impact of refrigerant leakage on subcooling. As indicated in Figure 7, the short-term noise associated with the measurement of liquid line subcooling (T sc ) was significant compared to the influence of refrigerant leakage at the levels introduced. This particular measurement is Figure 4. T sh startup transients with decreasing refrigerant charge Figure 5. T cond startup transients with decreasing refrigerant charge 313 HVAC&R RESEARCH important in distinguishing between refrigerant leakage from a liquid line restriction using the FDD method evaluated by Breuker (1997a). Thus, small fault sensitivity to noise ratio for this measurement causes problems with the correct diagnosis of refrigerant leakage. Fault Impacts on Performance Breuker (1997a) evaluated an FDD method using the transient data described in the previous section. The FDD method requires steady-state measurements of the seven temperatures pre- sented in Figures 3 through 9 and incorporates a steady-state detector that identifies operating Figure 6. T hg startup transients with decreasing refrigerant charge Figure 7. T ea startup transients with decreasing refrigerant charge VOLUME 4, NUMBER 3, JULY 1998 314 conditions that are near steady state. Diagnoses are performed through comparison of steady-state residuals (differences between the measured temperatures and expected tempera- tures for no fault operation) with a set of rules based on directional changes. The set of rules was derived from the test data described in the previous section and is summarized in Table 11. Each of the faults results in a different combination of positive or negative deviations from the mea- surements for the no-fault case. For instance, the deviations from the no-fault case for refrigerant leakage are evident from Figures 3 through 9. The rules of Table 11 held over all the loads and ambient conditions tested and are thought to be generic for the type of equipment considered in this study. Figure 8. T hg startup transients with decreasing refrigerant charge Figure 9. T ea startup transients with decreasing refrigerant charge 315 HVAC&R RESEARCH Tables 12 through 16 show the average impact of the five faults on cooling capacity, coeffi- cient of performance (COP), and compressor suction and discharge temperatures, as determined from all of the transient profiles. These performance indices provide a means of comparing the impact of different faults and quantifying the level at which faults become important. Reduc- tions in capacity and efficiency are important because they result in higher energy bills and/or loss of comfort for the building occupants, whereas no superheat or high discharge temperatures can lead to early compressor failure. Although the faults have very different effects on these indices, all of the faults are significant at the levels introduced and should be detected and diag- nosed by an FDD system. Refrigerant leakage, liquid-line restriction, and evaporator fouling Figure 10. T ea startup transients with decreasing refrigerant chargearge Figure 11. Air-side capacity startup transients with decreasing refrigerant charge VOLUME 4, NUMBER 3, JULY 1998 316 Table 11. Generic Rules for the Impact of Faults on Temperature Measurements Fault T evap T sh T cond T sc T hg T ca T ea Refrigerant leak
Compressor valve leakage Liquid-line restriction Condenser fouling Evaporator filter fouling Table 12. Changes in Rooftop Operation Due to Refrigerant Leakage Fault Level, % leakage % Change in Capacity % Change in COP Change in T sh , F (K) Change in T hg , F (K) 3.5 3.0 2.7 3.5 (1.9) 3.3 (1.8) 7.0 3.8 2.8 7.0 (3.9) 6.1 (3.4) 10.5 5.6 3.6 9.9 (5.5) 8.4 (4.7) 14.0 8.0 4.6 11.1 (6.2) 10.0 (5.6) Table 13. Changes in Rooftop Operation Due to Liquid Line Restriction Fault Level, % P % Change in Capacity % Change in COP Change in T sh , F (K) Change in T hg , F (K) 5 3.5 3.0 5.5 (3.1) 5.8 (3.2) 10.0 5.2 3.7 8.7 (4.8) 8.8 (4.9) 15.0 8.8 5.1 11.9 (6.6) 12.2 (6.8) 20.0 17.2 8.7 16.0 (8.9) 16.6 (9.2) Table 14. Changes in Rooftop Operation Due to Compressor Valve Leakage Fault Level % v % Change in Capacity % Change in COP Change in T sh , F (K) Change in T hg , F (K) 7 7.3 7.9 3.6 (2.0) 0.2 (0.1) 14 9.6 10.5 4.8 (2.7) 0.0 (0.0) 28 12.5 14.0 7.2 (4.0) 0.1 (0.06) 35 21.3 23.8 11.8 (6.6) 0.6 (0.3) Table 15. Changes in Rooftop Operation Due to Condenser Fouling Fault Level, % area block % Change in Capacity % Change in COP Change in T sh , F (K) Change in T hg , F (K) 14 3.1 4.3 0.8 (0.4) 2.2 (1.2) 28 4.8 7.7 4.2 (2.3) 2.6 (1.4) 42 7.4 12.2 8.0 (4.4) 3.1 (1.7) 56 10.9 17.9 11.2 (6.2) 4.5 (2.5) Table 16. Changes in Rooftop Operation Due to Evaporator Fouling Fault Level, % airflow % Change in Capacity % Change in COP Change in T sh , F (K) Change in T hg , F (K) 12 6.7 6.0 2.1 (1.2) 1.5 (0.8) 24 13.6 12.3 3.9 (2.2) 3.2 (1.8) 36 19.4 17.4 5.5 (3.1) 5.1 (2.8) 317 HVAC&R RESEARCH have a greater effect on capacity than COP. Condenser fouling affects COP more than capacity, and compressor valve leakage affects both features about the same. Refrigerant leakage, liquid line restriction, and condenser fouling lead to higher compressor temperatures. Evaporator foul- ing, compressor valve leakage, and condenser fouling cause low suction superheat. SUMMARY This paper has identified important faults and their impacts on the performance of rooftop air conditioners. The frequencies of occurrence and relative costs of service for different faults were estimated through analysis of service records. Electrical and controls problems occur most fre- quently, while compressor failure lead to the greatest overall service costs. The direct service costs associated with refrigerant cycle faults, such as refrigerant leakage and condenser fouling, are significant but smaller than those for compressor failures. However, these soft faults lead to compressor failures and degradations in cooling capacity and efficiency. Furthermore, soft faults such as refrigerant leakage are more difficult to detect and diagnose than hard failures. Several of these refrigeration cycle faults were simulated in the laboratory and the impacts on performance indices were quantified. The tests were designed to simulate realistic operation for a range of conditions where the unit was cycling on and off to meet a building load. A total of 96 transient tests were performed for the rooftop air conditioner at various load levels, ambient temperatures, and fault levels. Tem- peratures, cooling capacity and compressor power consumption were used as performance indi- ces to quantify the impacts of the faults on the system performance. The transient test results indicate that the system approaches steady-state during the on portion of each on/off cycle, even at low load levels. Thus, fault detection and diagnostics could be performed for this type of equipment using methods that incorporate steady-state assumptions and models. Each of the faults resulted in a different combination of positive or negative deviations from the measurements for the no-fault case. These changes resulted in a set of rules that can be used for diagnosing faults. The rules held over all the loads, fault levels, and ambient conditions tested and are thought to be generic for the type of equipment considered in this study. The aver- age impacts of the faults on cooling capacity and coefficient of performance (COP) were also evaluated. These indices are important because they result in higher energy bills and/or loss of comfort for the building occupants and provide a common measure for comparing the impact of different faults. All of the faults are significant at the levels introduced and should be detected and diagnosed by an FDD system. Refrigerant leakage, liquid line restriction, and evaporator fouling have a greater effect on capacity than COP. Condenser fouling affects COP more than capacity, and compressor valve leakage affects both features about the same. The data obtained during this work are very comprehensive and useful in the development and evaluation of FDD methods. Furthermore, these data have been used to design and evaluate the performance of an FDD method (Breuker, 1997a) that will be reported in a future paper. REFERENCES ASHRAE. 1993. ASHRAE HandbookFundamentals. Atlanta: ASHRAE. Breuker, M.S. 1997a. Evaluation of a Statistical, Rule-Based Fault Detection and Diagnostics Method for Vapor Compression Air Conditioners. Masters Thesis, School of Mechanical Engineering, Purdue University, IN. Breuker, M.S. 1997b. Transient Evaluation of a Fault Detection and Diagnostics MethodAnalysis Tools and Experimental Data. Technical Report HL98-9. Ray W. Herrick Laboratories, Purdue University, IN. Bultman, D.H., L.C. Burmeister, V. Bortone, and P.W. TenPas. 1993. Vapor-Compression Refrigerator Performance Degradation due to Condenser Airflow Blockage. In Proc.of the National Heat Transfer Conference. New York: ASME. VOLUME 4, NUMBER 3, JULY 1998 318 Grimmelius, H.T., J. Klein Woud, and G. Been. 1995. On-line Failure Diagnosis for Compression Refrig- eration Plants. International Journal of Refrigeration 18(1): 31-41. Inatsu, H., H. Matsuo, K. Fujiwara, K. Yamada, and K. Nishizawa. 1992. Development of Refrigerant Monitoring Systems for Automotive Air-Conditioning Systems. In Proc. of The Society of Automotive Engineers. SAE Paper # 920212. Janaushek, Neil. 1995. Personal communication, Carrier Corporation, Syracuse, NY. Krafthefer, B., C. Rask, and D.R. Bonne. 1987. Air-Conditioning and Heat Pump Operating Cost Savings by Maintaining Coil Cleanliness. ASHRAE Transactions 93(1): 1458-1473. Kumamaru, T., T. Utsunomiya, Y. Yamada, Y. Iwasaki, I. Shoda, and M. Obayashi. 1991. A Fault Diagno- sis System for District Heating and Cooling Facilities, In Proc. of the International Conference on Industrial Electronics, Control, and Instrumentation, Kobe, Japan (IECON 91), pp. 131-136. Megrue, J. 1995. Personal communication. United Rebuilders, Mt. Vernon, NY. McKellar, M.G. 1987. Failure Diagnosis for a Household Refrigerator. Masters thesis, School of Mechanical Engineering, Purdue University, IN. Rossi, T.M. 1995. Detection, Diagnosis, and Evaluation of Faults in Vapor Compression Cycle Equipment. Ph.D. Thesis, School of Mechanical Engineering, Purdue University, IN. Rossi, T.M., and J.E. Braun. 1996. Minimizing Operating Costs of Vapor Compression Equipment with Optimal Service Scheduling. Intl. J. of HVAC&R Research 2(1): 23-47. Rossi, T.M., and J.E. Braun. 1997. A Statistical, Rule-Based Fault Detection and Diagnostic Method for Vapor Compression Air Conditioners. Intl. J. of HVAC&R Research 3(1): 19-37. Stallard, L.A. 1989. Model Based Expert System for Failure Detection and Identification of Household Refrigerators. Masters thesis, School of Mechanical Engineering, Purdue University. Stouppe, D.E., and Y.S., Lau. 1989. Air Conditioning and Refrigeration Equipment Failures. National Engineer 93(9): 14-17. Stylianou, M., and D. Nikanpour. 1996. Performance Monitoring, Fault Detection, and Diagnosis of Recip- rocating Chillers. ASHRAE Transactions 102(1): 615-627. Wagner, J., and R. Shoureshi. 1992. Failure Detection Diagnostics for Thermofluid Systems, Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control 114(4): 699-706. Yoshimura, M., and I. Noboru. 1989. Effective Diagnosis Methods for Air-Conditioning Equipment in Telecommunications Buildings. In Proc. of INTELEC 89: The Eleventh International Telecommunica- tions Energy Conference 21(1): 1-7. Centro dei Congressi, Firenze, Italy.