Professional Documents
Culture Documents
( | | | | | |
= +
( | | |
\ \ \
(1) 144
145
where fusHs
and Ts,fus account for the melting enthalpy and melting temperature of 146
the pure solute, respectively. T is the equilibrium temperature, R the ideal gas 147
constant and
L
s
the solute's activity coefficient of the solute in the liquid phase. 148
149
2.2. Activity coefficients 150
In order to compute the activity coefficients, two local composition models were 151
applied in this work. These models are explicit in terms of excess Gibbs free energy, 152
g
E
, and the activity coefficient is calculated through fundamental thermodynamic 153
relationships
28
. In this work we considered two well-known models: the non-random- 154
two-liquid model, NRTL
29
and the UNIQUAC model
30
UNIQUAC structural parameters 155
ri and qi for each pure compound are usually calculated using the group-contribution 156
Page 7 of 48
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
8
values of Bondi
31
. However, for ILs other methodologies are needed and in this work 157
we used an empirical model proposed by Domanska and Mazurowska
32
was used: 158
0.029281
i
M
r
= (2) 159
( ) 2 1
2
i
i i
l
z
q r
z z
= + (3) 160
In the above expressions, z and li stand for the coordination number and bulk 161
factor and assume the values of 10 and 1, respectively. M is the molar mass of the ionic 162
liquid in gmol
-1
and , the density at 298.15 K in gcm
-3
. 163
2.3. Data correlation 164
The parameters for each model were obtained by fitting to the experimental data, 165
through minimization of the following objective function: 166
2
,
exp.
1 ,
1
p
N Model
s i
i s i
obj
p
F
N
=
| |
|
|
\
=
(4) 167
with, Np representing the number of experimental points and the experimental 168
activity coefficients,
exp.
, s i
, calculated through eq.1 according to: 169
, , , exp.
,
, ,
( )
( ) 1
exp 1 1 ln
L
S L
fus s s fus s fus s fus
Ps
s i
s i s fus i i i
H T T T
C
x RT T R T T
| | ( | | | | | |
= + |
( | | |
|
\ \ \ \
(5) 170
After fitting the adjustable parameters, the quality of the data correlation was 171
evaluated by means of the average absolute relative deviation, AARD: 172
( )
,exp. ,mod
,exp.
, ,
1
,
100
%
L L el p
L
N
s i s i
i
p s i
x x
AARD
N x
=
(6) 173
2.4. Thermodynamic functions of dissolution 174
Page 8 of 48
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
9
The approach to calculate the thermodynamic functions of dissolution proposed by 175
Krug and co-workers
32
was adopted in this work. The dissolution enthalpy is 176
calculated through a modified Vant Hoff equation and it is obtained from the slope of 177
the linear representation of ln(xs) vs. (1/T - 1/Thm): 178
0
.
ln
1 1
s
diss
hm
P
x
H R
T T
(
(
(
=
(
| |
(
|
(
\
(7) 179
In this approach, the harmonic average temperature, Thm is calculated from the 180
experimental data: 181
1
1
p
p
hm N
i i
N
T
T
=
=
(8) 182
The intercept of the linear representation, k, represents the logarithm of the 183
solubility at Thm, and it is used to calculate the Gibbs free energy of dissolution: 184
0
. diss hm
G RT k = (9) 185
Finally, the dissolution entropy is calculated from the definition of Gibbs free 186
energy: 187
0 0
0 . .
.
diss diss
diss
hm
H G
S
T
= (10) 188
189
190
3. Materials and Methods 191
3.1. Materials 192
Page 9 of 48
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
10
D-(-)-fructose and D-(+)-glucose supplied by Merck with purity > 0.99. Sodium 193
dicyanamide, NaN(CN)2, (>0.97, Acros Organics) and sodium nitrate, NaNO3, (>0.99, 194
Sigma) were used in the synthesis of Aliquat
336 supplied by Acros organics with 0.0386 of water mass fraction 196
(measured by Karl-Fisher titration) and with a molar mass of 442 gmol
-1
, n-heptane 197
(> 0.99, BDH Prolabo) and acetone (>0.999, Labsolve) were also used in the 198
preparation of these two ionic liquids. 1-Methylimidazole (>0.99, Merck) and ethyl 199
trifluoroacetate (>0.999, Merck) were used for the preparation of [emim][TFA]. The 200
ionic liquids [emim][DCA] (>0.99), [bmim][DCA] (>0.98) and [P6,6,6,14][DCA] (>0.95) 201
were purchased from Iolitec GmbH and used as received. Silver nitrate, AgNO3 (Ph. 202
Eur, Merck) was used for quantification of chloride anion content in Aliquat
[DCA] 203
and Aliquat
[NO3]. A sample description of the ionic liquids and the sugars is 204
provided in table 1, and the chemical structures of the ions present in the ionic liquids 205
are presented in Figure 1. All purities are given in mass fraction. 206
207
3.2. Methods 208
3.2.1. Synthesis of ionic liquids 209
210
Aliquat
[NO3] 211
212
The preparation of this IL was carried out according to a procedure available in 213
literature
33
and applying the improvements in purification as described in a previous 214
work
27
. About 58 % in excess of NaNO3 was dissolved in deionized water. Aliquat
336 215
Page 10 of 48
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
11
at 373 K was added dropwise to the aqueous solution with 10 mL of acetone to 216
improve phase separation. The mixture was stirred at room temperature for six hours, 217
and then two liquid phases were formed. The IL-rich phase was washed with 218
deionized water to remove sodium chloride and unreacted sodium nitrate, whereas 219
the separation of unreacted Aliquat
[DCA] 228
229
This synthesis was performed based on a procedure available in the 230
literature
35
. 200 g of Aliquat
[DCA]. 236
Finally, the ionic liquid was dried under vacuum at 353 K to remove all the volatile 237
compounds. Approximately 100 g of Aliquat
[NO3], Aliquat
[DCA] with 1.9 wt.% of water was measured at 323.15 K for comparison 386
purposes (see filled symbols in Fig. 2 and 3). This proves that even with the same 387
water content, the Aliquat
[NO3]. Figures 2 and 3 also show the comparison with the 389
solubility of the two sugars in water. In molar fraction basis, the three hydrophilic ILs 390
present higher values of glucose and fructose solubility than water, following the 391
series: [emim][TFA]>[emim][DCA]>[bmim][DCA]. Solubility in the hydrophobic ILs is 392
much lower than in water, following the series: Aliquat
[NO3]> Aliquat
[DCA]> 393
[P6,6,6,14][DCA]. In addition to water solubility, ideal solubility of glucose and fructose 394
are also plotted in Fig. 2 and 3. This clearly shows that in hydrophilic ionic liquids, the 395
solutions have negative deviations (solute < 1) relative to an ideal solution (no 396
interactions between carbohydrate and IL), while in hydrophobic ILs, positive 397
deviations to the ideal solubility (solute > 1) were observed from the solubility data. 398
Moreover, glucose and fructose water solubility is closer to the ideal solubility than 399
solubilities in any IL. In accordance to this fact, the IL with higher water content, 400
Aliquat[NO3], is the one in which solubility of the sugars are closer to ideal 401
solubility. 402
Glucose solubility data in [bmim][DCA] are available in literature. A comparison 403
with the results obtained in this work, is presented in Figure 4. Data from references
38,
404
42
were determined in gL
-1
. Direct comparison with the data obtained in this work 405
with those data, would only be possible if the density of the saturated solution were 406
known. Therefore, in this work and to enable proper conversion of these literature 407
Page 18 of 48
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
19
data to molar fractions, the density of mixtures of glucose and [bmim][DCA] were 408
measured at five different concentration and four temperatures, as it is shown in 409
Table 5. From the knowledge of the concentrations in mole fraction, density of the 410
solutions, , and the molar mass, M, of the two components, one could calculate the 411
correspondent concentration in gL
-1
is calculated as follows: 412
413
( )
( )
1
1
[ ][ ]
glucose glucose
1
1 1
emim DCA
g mL
C g mL
M
M x
=
| || |
+
| |
| |
\ \
(11) 414
415
Then, the correspondence between the two concentrations can be achieved 416
through linear regression of the calculated values, as shown in Figure 5. 417
This linear regression gave a slope of 0.9711, an intercept of 5.1310
-3
and a 418
correlation coefficient of 0.9991, which represents a good correlation despite some 419
dispersion observed due to density variation with temperature. With this relation, the 420
literature data
38, 42
could be converted into molar fraction and therefore compared 421
with the data measured in this work as presented in Figure 4. Clearly, solubility data 422
measured in [bmim][DCA] are in good agreement with the literature. However 423
comparing solubilities of glucose at 308 K in Aliquat
[NO3]:; Aliquat
[DCA]: and (with 1.9 wt% of water, see text for 785
details);[P6,6,6,14][DCA]:;UNIQUAC : ; ideal solubility: . 786
*experimental data not modeled, dash-dot line is just to guide the eye 787
788
Figure 3. Solubility of fructose in the studied ionic liquids and in water. 789
[emim][TFA]:;[emim][DCA]:;[bmim][DCA]:; water
54-55
: *; 790
Aliquat
[NO3]:; Aliquat
[DCA]: and (with 1.9 wt% of water, see text for 791
details);[P6,6,6,14][DCA]:;UNIQUAC: ; ideal solubility: . 792
*experimental data not modeled, dash-dot line is just to guide the eye 793
794
Figure 4 - Comparison of glucose solubility in [bmim][DCA] with literature data. This 795
work - ; Ref. 25 - ; Ref. 42 - ; Ref. 38 - . 796
797
Figure 5 - Concentration correspondence for the system glucose+[bmim][DCA] 798
799
Figure 6 Comparison of glucoses solubility at 308 K with literature data. 800
801
Figure 7 Degradation of fructose in [emim][TFA] 802
803
804
Page 32 of 48
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
33
Figures 805
806
807
Figure 1 808
809
810
Page 33 of 48
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
34
Temperature / K
290 300 310 320 330 340
S
o
l
u
b
i
l
i
t
y
/
m
o
l
e
f
r
a
c
t
i
o
n
0.05
0.15
0.25
0.35
0.00
0.10
0.20
0.30
0.40
811
Figure 2 812
813
814
Page 34 of 48
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
35
815
Temperature / K
280 290 300 310 320 330 340 350
S
o
l
u
b
i
l
i
t
y
/
m
o
l
e
f
r
a
c
t
i
o
n
0.05
0.15
0.25
0.35
0.45
0.00
0.10
0.20
0.30
0.40
0.50
816
Figure 3 817
818
819
Page 35 of 48
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
36
Temperature / K
280 290 300 310 320 330 340 350 360
S
o
l
u
b
i
l
i
t
y
/
m
o
l
f
r
a
c
t
i
o
n
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
0.35
0.40
0.45
820
Figure 4 821
822
Page 36 of 48
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
37
glucose concentration / gmL
0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30
m
o
l
f
r
a
c
t
o
n
o
f
g
l
u
c
o
s
e
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
823
Figure 5 824
825
Page 37 of 48
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
38
Ionic Liquids
[
C
l
]
[
D
C
A
]
[
S
A
C
]
[
A
C
E
S
]
[
S
C
N
]
[
C
l
]
[
D
C
A
]
[
S
A
C
]
[
A
C
E
S
]
[
S
C
N
]
[
A
C
E
T
]
[
C
l
]
[
D
C
A
]
[
S
A
C
]
[
A
C
E
S
]
[
S
C
N
]
[
A
C
E
T
]
[
N
T
f
2
]
[
D
C
A
]
*
[
A
C
E
T
]
[
A
C
E
T
]
E
t
S
O
4
*
*
[
D
C
A
]
*
[
T
F
A
]
*
[
C
l
]
[
D
C
A
]
*
[
A
C
E
T
]
[
C
l
]
*
*
[
D
C
A
]
*
[
A
C
E
T
]
[
N
O
3
]
*
S
o
l
u
b
i
l
i
t
y
/
m
o
l
a
r
f
r
a
c
t
i
o
n
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
Solubility
water content
[MOEOEMIM] [(C
3
O)
4
DMG] [(di-h)
2
DMG] [BMIM] [EMIM] [P
6,6,6,14
] Aliquat
W
a
t
e
r
c
o
n
t
e
n
t
/
m
a
s
s
f
r
a
c
t
i
o
n
826
*data measured in this work 827
**data measured in a previous work (Carneiro et al., 2012a) 828
Figure 6 829
830
Page 38 of 48
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
39
Temperature / K
280 290 300 310 320 330 340
S
o
l
u
b
i
l
i
t
y
o
f
f
r
u
c
t
o
s
e
/
m
o
l
a
r
f
r
a
c
t
i
o
n
0.35
0.36
0.37
0.38
0.39
0.40
0.41
0.42
831
Figure 7 832
833
834
Page 39 of 48
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
40
835
List of Tables 836
Table 1- Sample description table of the chemicals used 837
838
Chemical Name Source Initial Purity
Purification
Method
Final
Purity
Analysis Method
[emim][DCA] Iolitec 0.99 - 0.99 -
[bmim][DCA] Iolitec 0.98 - 0.98 -
[P6,6,6,14][DCA] Iolitec 0.95 - 0.95 -
[emim][TFA] Synthesized Not measured Distillation 0.999
Karl-Fisher Titration, HPLC and
1
H-NMR
Aliquat
[NO3]
Aliquat
[DCA]
[P6,6,6,14][DCA]
T / K xs
*
10
2
T / K xs 10
2
T / K xs 10
2
299.95 0.0078 0.07 298.37 0.0018 0.09
307.75 0.0393 0.05 307.72 0.0114 0.05 308.29 0.0024 0.02
318.19 0.053 0.1 317.93 0.01759 0.004 318.43 0.00365 0.003
328.05 0.0691 0.03 328.8 0.0215 0.08 329.51 0.0048 0.04
339.75 0.0865 0.02 339.74 0.03230 0.006
u
)/
846
847
848
849
Page 41 of 48
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
42
Table 3. Experimental solubility data of fructose in the ionic liquids 850
851
Aliquat
[NO3]
Aliquat
[DCA]
[P6,6,6,14][DCA]
T / K xs
*
10
2
T / K xs 10
2
T / K xs 10
2
299.95 0.032 0.5
298.37 0.00276 0.004
307.75 0.131 0.1
307.72 0.054 0.1
308.29 0.0070 0.05
318.15 0.158 0.4
317.93 0.0716 0.07
318.43 0.011 0.1
328.05 0.185 0.2
328.8 0.1017 0.04
329.51 0.0552 0.04
339.75 0.218 0.4
339.74 0.130 0.3
u
)/
854
855
856
857
Page 42 of 48
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
43
Table 4. Molar mass of the ionic liquids and water contents before and after solubility 858
measurements 859
Ionic Liquid M / gmol
-1
Water / wt.%
Before
After
Glucose Fructose
Aliquat
[DCA] [P6,6,6,14][DCA]
This work 0.0114 0.0024
25 0.0321 0.0151
867
868
Page 45 of 48
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
46
869
Table 7 Results for solubility data correlation with NRTL and UNIQUAC 870
Solute Ionic Liquid
NRTL UNIQUAC
g12/R
(K)
g21/R
(K)
AARD
(%)
u12/R
(K)
u21/R
(K)
AARD
(%)
Glucose [emim][DCA] 0.30 -828.7 901.6 2.5 -230.5 156.2 2.4
[bmim][DCA] 0.30 -732.4 836.5 3.3 -243.0 234.4 3.3
[emim][TFA] 0.30 -974.8 1848.9 2.0 -82.3 -119.7 2.0
Aliquat
0
diss. H
(kJmol
-1
)
0
diss. G
(kJmol
-1
)
0
diss. S
(Jmol
-1
)
Glucose [emim][DCA]
307.6 9.5 3.8 18.5
[bmim][DCA]
307.6 11.0 4.3 21.5
[emim][TFA]
298.1 5.5 3.1 8.0
Aliquat
[DCA]
318.2 29.1 10.9 57.2
Aliquat
[NO3]
323.0 21.6 7.6 43.5
[P6,6,6,14][DCA] 313.2 26.3 15.2 35.7
Fructose [emim][DCA] 307.6 7.8 2.3 17.7
[bmim][DCA] 307.6 7.5 2.8 15.3
[emim][TFA] 298.1 5.6 2.3 11.0
Aliquat