Team Name:

P-session:
P1 P2 P3 P4
Fri Tue Wed Thur

Admitted to Knock-Out Competition: YES / NO
Name Specialisation (>1
permitted)
Build
Contribution
(%)
Demoday
Attendance
Team Member 1
Team Member 2
Team Member 3
Team Member 4
Team Member 5
Team Member 6
Team Member 7

Scoring Criteria Score Comments
Meets Requirements
A =


Mechanical Build and
Robustness
B =


Software
C =


Electrical
D =


Creativity and
Innovation in design
E =


Simplicity and
manufacturability
F =


Cost
G=


Total Score:

Score = A + B + C + D + E + F G
(from next page)
Claim Limit:




Demonstration:
A Area Scanned
B Mines Correctly
Detected
C Mines Detonated
Interference (-20%)



Total Score: 0.3 * A + (B-C) *14% =
Meets Requirements
(A)
(30%)
Mechanical Build and
Robustness (B)
(10%)
Software (C)
(10%)
Electrical (D)
(10%)
Creativity and
Innovation in
design (E) (20%)
Simplicity and
manufacturability (F)
(20%)
Cost (G)
Excellent
(85% -
100%)
You meet all standard
and highly desirable
design specifications
and provide some
extra capability.
30 Carefully designed and
professionally
constructed. Overall
professional
appearance.
Includes innovative
design features.
10
Code is in
accordance with
best practice.
Innovative
features.
10
Wiring is in
accordance with best
practice.
Good and clear
cable layout. Some
innovative features.
10
Significant
creativity.
Novel features
which expand
the possible role
of the craft.
20
Built from easily sourced and
sustainable materials. Can
easily be mass-produced.
Innovative feature to enhance
sustainability and production.
20
If under budget:
G = 0

If over budget :
G = 1%
for every dollar,
or start thereof,
spent over $120.
E.g. Cost = 123.02
G = 4%
28
26 19 19
Very
Good
(75% -
84%)
You meet all standard
and highly desirable
design specifications.
25
Carefully designed and
professionally
constructed. Overall
professional
appearance.
9
Code is in
accordance with
best practice.
One innovative
feature.
9
Wiring is in
accordance with best
practice. Good and
clear layout.
9
Outstanding
effort,
some creativity.
18
Build from easily sourced and
sustainable materials. Can
easily be mass-produced.
18
23 8 8 8 16 16
Good
(65% -
74%)
You meet all standard
and at least one highly
desirable design
specifications
22
Well designed and
constructed. Solid
appearance.
7
Code is in
accordance with
best practice.
7
Wiring is in
accordance with best
practice. Layout
could be improved.
7
Significant
effort,
some creativity.
15
Uses single difficult to source,
non-sustainable or difficult to
mass produce component. Use
of component is well justified.
15
20 13 13
Pass
(50% -
64%)
You meet all standard
design specifications.
19
Design and
construction has a
fragile appearance.
6
Software is fit
for purpose, but
code writing
standard is
poor.
6
Electrical circuitry
are fit for purpose,
but quality is
lacking
6
Some effort,
minimal
creativity.
12
Uses single difficult to source,
non-sustainable or difficult to
mass produce component.
12
18
16
5 5 5 10 10
15
Fail
(25% -
49%)
You meet some of the
design specifications,
or were close to
meeting them.
14
Very fragile
construction (worried
something will fall
off).
4
Performance of
code is
questionable
4
Poor electrical build
standard (no colour
convention, wire
conections are not of
appropriate
standard).
4
Minimal effort,
no creativity.
9
Your design may include some
unusual components, or
specialist workmanship, or
construction is unable to be
mass produced
9
12 7 7
10
3 3 3 5 5
8
Disaster!
(0% -
24%)

You did not meet any
of the design
specifications, and
were not close to
meeting them.
6
Product is incomlete
2 No assessable
material
submitted.
2
Wiring is in
disarray.
2
No effort.
4
Your design may include some
unusual components, and/or
specialist workmanship, or/and
construction is unable to be
mass produced
4
4
0 0 0 0 0 0