Pemex 2005 Safety, Health, and Environmental Protection

safety, health
and environmental
protection
a
n
n
u
a
l

r
e
p
o
r
t

2
0
0
5
PETRLEOS MEXI CANOS
soci al r esponsi bi l i t y sust ai nabl e devel opment
directory
Operations Corporate Management Ofce
Av. Marina Nacional 329
Torre Ejecutiva, piso 35
Col. Huasteca,11311
Mexico, D.F.
Tel. 55 1944 9071
Fax. 55 1944 8946
THIS REPORT IS AVAILABLE AT:
www.pemex.com
COMMENTS:
informe_sspa2005@pemex.com
Adiabatic distillation
Process in which heat is supplied externally in the
distillation tower to reduce the energy degradation and to
diminish the environmental impact of the process.
API Systems
Decantation equipments for oil-water separation.
Aromatic hydrocarbons (AH)
Hydrocarbons with a cyclic structure that have usually a
characteristic odor and possess the chemical properties
of good solvents.
Carbon dioxide (CO2)
Greenhouse gas produced by oxidation of compounds
containing carbon.
Catalyst
A substance that helps and increases a reaction without
being involved in the process. It increases the rate of
the reaction at lower temperatures, remaining without
change up to the end of the reaction. Nevertheless, in
industrial processes, the spent catalyst must be replaced
periodically to maintain an efficient production.
Cryogenic processes
Processes with an intensive use of energy to produce high
pressures and low temperatures.
Pits
Constructions to retain solid and liquid waists produced
during well drillings.
Drill cuttings
Soil and rocks removed during exploration and production
wells drillings. Oils impregnate cuttings through their
contact with drilling muds.
Drilling muds
A mixture of clays, water and chemicals used in drilling
operations to lubricate and cool the bit, bring drill cuttings
to the surface, prevent well wall from collapsing and to
control gas or crude oil upward flow.
Energy intensity rate in reneries
Measure of energy efficiency in refineries, equivalent to
the real energy consumption divided by the international
theoretical consumption, taking into account the
configuration and use of the refinery.
Floating membraness
Storage tank covers that move according to the contained
liquid level. They are used to reduce the emissions of
hydrocarbons evaporation.
Frequency rate
Ratio of the number of disabling accidents occurred per
million man hours with risk exposure in a given period,
without including the accidents occurred on the way
to/from work nor those due to third party actions and/or
insecure conditions out of PEMEX control reach.
Fugitive emissions
Emissions not caught by a capture system which are
often due to equipment leaks, evaporative processes and
windblown disturbances. Typically they are considered as
those of methane and other non-methane VOCs.
Gravity rate
Ratio of the number of days lost due to disabling
accidents per million risk exposure man work hours
in a given period of time, not including the accidents
occurred on the way to/from work nor those due to third
party actions and/or insecure conditions out of PEMEX
control reach.
Greenhouse gases (GHG)
Gases contributing to the formation of a thermally
insulating layer around the Earth. The main GHG are:
water vapor, carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, and
halogenated hydrocarbons.
Heavy chlorinated hydrocarbons
Hydrocarbon chains in which a varied number of hydrogen
atoms has been substituted by chlorine atoms. Heavy
chlorinated hydrocarbons are those chains containing
from four to six chlorine atoms, known as hexachloride
compounds.
CONCEPT AND DESIGN
Margara Corts Chapula
Fernanda Ogarrio Compen
WRITING AND COPY-EDITING
Mara Losn de Fbregas
TRANSLATION
Helena Contreras Chacel
PHOTOGRAPHY
PEMEX - Corporate management ofce of Social Communication
Jorge Contreras Chacel
Eduardo de la Vega
Hctor Elorduy
PRINTED IN MEXICO BY:
Ediciones Grcas Zeta
www.pemex.com
Luis Ramrez Corzo
DIRECTOR GENERAL
Carlos A. Morales Gil
ACTING DIRECTOR GENERAL OF PEMEX
EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTION
Miguel Tame Domnguez
ACTING DIRECTOR GENERAL OF PEMEX REFINING
Roberto Ramrez Sobern
ACTING DIRECTOR GENERAL OF PEMEX GAS
AND BASIC PETROCHEMICALS
Rafael Beverido Lomeln
DIRECTOR GENERAL OF PEMEX PETROCHEMICALS
Marcos Ramrez Silva
CORPORATE DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS
Federico Martnez Salas
CORPORATE DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING
AND PROJECTS DEVELOPMENT
Rosendo Villarreal Dvila
CORPORATE DIRECTOR OF ADMINISTRATION
Juan Jos Surez Coppel
CORPORATE DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
Jos Nstor Garca Reza
GENERAL ATTORNEY
Gregorio Guerrero Pozas
PEMEX INTERNAL CONTROL BUREAU
Rosendo Zambrano Fernndez
DIRECTOR GENERAL OF P.M.I. INTERNATIONAL COMMERCE
Jos Antonio Ceballos
DIRECTOR GENERAL OF THE MEXICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE
a
g
g
r
e
g
a
t
e
d

e
c
o
n
o
m
i
c

v
a
l
u
e
A
N
N
U
A
L

R
E
P
O
R
T

2
0
0
5
S
A
F
E
T
Y
,

H
E
A
L
T
H

A
N
D

E
N
V
I
R
O
N
M
E
N
T
A
L

P
R
O
T
E
C
T
I
O
N
P
E
T
R
L
E
O
S

M
E
X
I
C
A
N
O
S
Heavy metals
Metals that may produce negative effects on flora, fauna
or human health, in concentrations above certain limits.
Under the Official Mexican Standard, only the following
are considered: arsenic, cadmium, copper, chromium,
mercury, nickel, lead, zinc, as well as cyanides.
Hexachlorinated residues
See Heavy chlorinated hydrocarbons.
Hydrodesulfurization
Process to eliminate sulfur from the molecules using
hydrogen under pressure and a catalyst.
Implementation Units
Group of facilities that are defined in the SIASPA
implementation framework.
ISO-14001
ISO Norm of the International Standardization
Organization, referring to environmental management
systems.
Liquid recuperator
Equipment installed in pipelines to recover unwanted
liquids.
Methane (CH4)
It is considered a greenhouse gas. Conventionally it is
not included among the gases known as volatile organic
compounds.
Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)
A generic term for nitrous oxides. These compounds are
produced during combustion processes due to oxidation
of nitrogen contained in the air. They contribute to the
tropospheric ozone formation and that of acid rain.
Oil and grease (O&G)
Any solid or viscous substance that can be recuperated to
be dissolved in one of the following solvents: n-hexane,
trichlorotrifluoroethane, or a blend of 80% n-hexane and
20% methyl tertiary butyl ether.
Oily sludges
Solid wastes with hydrocarbon content, such as solids
associated with crude oil, impregnated in the soil and
contention systems hydrocarbons sediments (tanks, pits,
dams, etc.).
Oily waters
Waters containing oil and grease.
Phenolic waters
Waters containing phenol.
Phenols
Compounds formed by benzilic radicals associated with
OH- radicals.
PM10 and PM2.5 particles
Particulate matter (PM). Produced, among others by fuel
combustion in vehicles and industries, and are part of
atmospheric pollution. They are classified according to
their diameter in microns (for example: PM10 = 10 microns
diameter). Those with a minor diameter are usually more
harmful to health, because they can penetrate deeper into
the respiratory system.
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs)
Chlorinated hydrocarbons. These compounds are
structured by a system of benzenic rings, in which a
varied number of hydrogen atoms has been substituted
by chlorine atoms. The PCBs are used, less and less,
as oils in electric current transformers due to their
dielectric properties and their ability to dissipate heat.
These compounds are toxic, very stable and, therefore,
very persistent in nature, because their destruction
or degradation is very difficult. One of the few ways
to eliminate these compounds is by high temperature
controlled incineration.
Secondary energy
The group of fuels derived from primary energy sources,
obtained in the transformation plants, with specific
characteristics for their final consumption.
Sour gas
Natural gas containing sulfidric acid, requiring treatment
to be used as a fuel.
glossary
Sour waters
Waters containing sulfidric acid (H2S).
Specic discharge conditions
A set of physical, chemical and biological parameters
and their maximum permitted levels in waist water
discharges, as determined by the Comisin Nacional del
Agua (National Water Commission) for the responsible
party or parties for the waist water discharge or for a
specific receiving body, with the aim to preserve and
control the water quality accordingly to the Ley de Aguas
Nacionales (National Waters Law) and its regulations.
Suldes (in wastewaters)
Sulfur compounds present in wastewaters.
Sulfur Oxides (SOx)
A generic term for compounds, generated by fuel
combustion processes, with sulfur in their composition.
They contribute to acid rain phenomenon.
Total non-methanic volatile organic
compounds (TNMVOC)
Organic compounds resulting from incomplete combustion
of hydrocarbons and that do not contain methane.
Total suspended particles (TSP)
Term used to designate the total of particles and
particulate matter in the air.
Total suspended solids (TSS)
Particles suspended or present in wastewaters. They
are held in a micro-fiberglass filtering mean with a 1.5
microns or equivalent pore diameter.
Total volatile organic compounds
(TVOC)
They are the sum of the VOCs and the TMNVOCs.
Vapor recuperator
Equipment installed in tanks and fillers to recover
hydrocarbons vapors, in facilities or processes with high
rates of evaporation.
Volatile organic compounds (VOC)
Organic compounds that easily vaporize at room
temperature, including several hydrocarbons, oxygenated
compounds and compounds with a sulfur content. They
are usually grouped into methane and other non-methane
VOCs. All VOCs contribute tropospheric ozone formation
through a photochemical reaction with nitrogen oxides.
Abbreviations
ASIPAS Auditoras de Seguridad Industrial y
Proteccin Ambiental (Industrial Security
and Environmental Protection Audits)
BBCOE Billions of Barrels of Crude Oil Equivalent
BCO Barrel of Crude Oil
BCOE Barrel of Crude Oil Equivalent. Normalization
of the caloric values of different sources of
energy referred to the caloric value of a
barrel of crude oil.
CPG Centro Procesador de Gas
(Gas Processing Center)
DCO Direccin Corporativa de Operaciones
(Operations Corporate Management Office)
EBITDA Earnings Before Interests, Taxes,
Depreciations and Amortization
GRI Global Reporting Initiative
lps Liters per Second
MBCOE Millions of Barrels of Crude Oil Equivalent
MCF Millions of Cubic Feet
MDCF Millions of Daily Cubic Feet
MTBE Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether
MW Mega Wats
PEP PEMEX Exploracin y Produccin
(PEMEX Exploration and Production)
PGPB PEMEX Gas y Petroqumica Bsica
(PEMEX Gas and Basic Petrochemicals)
PPQ PEMEX Petroqumica (PEMEX Petrochemicals)
PR PEMEX Refinacin (PEMEX Refining)
saf et y, heal t h and envi r onment al pr ot ect i on i v

safety, health
and environmental
protection
a
n
n
u
a
l

r
e
p
o
r
t

2
0
0
5
PETRLEOS MEXI CANOS
directory
Col. Huasteca,11311
Mexico, D.F.
Tel. 55 1944 9071
Fax. 55 1944 8946
www.pemex.com
COMMENTS:
API Systems
of good solvents.
containing carbon.
Catalyst
Cryogenic processes
Pits
Drill cuttings
Drilling muds
Floating membraness
Frequency rate
Fugitive emissions
Gravity rate
control reach.
compounds.
CONCEPT AND DESIGN
TRANSLATION
PHOTOGRAPHY
Eduardo de la Vega
Hctor Elorduy
www.pemex.com
Luis Ramrez Corzo
DIRECTOR GENERAL
Marcos Ramrez Silva
GENERAL ATTORNEY
a
g
g
r
e
g
a
t
e
d

e
c
o
n
o
m
i
c

v
a
l
u
e
A
N
N
U
A
L

R
E
P
O
R
T

2
0
0
5
S
A
F
E
T
Y
,

H
E
A
L
T
H

A
N
D

E
N
V
I
R
O
N
M
E
N
T
A
L

P
R
O
T
E
C
T
I
O
N
P
E
T
R
L
E
O
S

M
E
X
I
C
A
N
O
S
Heavy metals
ISO-14001
systems.
Liquid recuperator
liquids.
Methane (CH4)
compounds.
Oily sludges
dams, etc.).
Oily waters
Phenolic waters
Phenols
OH- radicals.
Secondary energy
Sour gas
glossary
Sour waters
Sulfur Oxides (SOx)
compounds (TNMVOC)
(TVOC)
Vapor recuperator
Abbreviations
MW Mega Wats
saf et y, heal t h and envi r onment al pr ot ect i on 1
Message f r om t he Di r ect or Gener al 2
Rel evant not es about t hi s r epor t
a. Reporting principles i i
b. Transparency commitment 4
Pet r l eos Mexi canos i n cont ext 8
a. Infrastructure and main operational results 10
b. Main economic results 11
c. Hydrocarbons reserves 12
d. Corporate governance 13
e. Risk management 13
I ndust r i al saf et y
a. Personal accidents 14
b. Occupational health 20
c. Spills and leaks in pipelines 22
Envi r onment al per f or mance
a. Emissions to air 26
b. Climate change 32
c. Water utilization and discharges 40
d Waste water discharges 42
e. Hazardous waste 48
f. Certications 52
Soci al r esponsi bi l i t y
a. Social development 54
b. Protected natural areas 60
c. Land ecological ordinance 63
St at i st i cal appendi x 66
Concor dance wi t h GRI f r amewor k 70
Gl ossar y i v

Audi t or s r epor t v
Contents
2 annual r epor t 2005
Message from the Director
The year 2005 is a milestone in the way we manage the safety of our operations: with the
introduction of an emergency program to reinforce the safety of our personnel, we reduced in
29%, in relation to 2004, the occurrence of employees accidents resulting in disabilities,
with a total of 1.06 accidents per million of labored man hours, the lowest rate since 2001.
This trend points in the right direction, but the results are still poor: during the year, ten of
our fellow oil men and 21 contractor workers lost their lives in work related accidents. Given
these circumstances, the best instrument we have to avoid the loss of human lives is the
comprehensive management of safety. Therefore, the systematization of the emergency
effort, initiated in 2005, is one of our main commitments for the next three years, and rati-
es that our rst priority, within our concept of sustainable development, is the safety of
our workers.
Sustainable development means also our engagement in the environmental issues. For that
purpose our most recent effort has focused in risk detection and suppression, as well as
remediation of the environmental damages caused by the transport by pipeline of hydrocar-
bons. Throughout 2005, in accordance with our restoration program, we endeavored to repair
the damages caused, in December 2004, by the spilling of nearly ve thousand barrels of oil
into the Coatzacoalcos river. We managed to restore an estimated of 75% in the remedia-
tion of soil and sediments on the banks of the Coatzacoalcos river and on the affected
mangrove swamp areas.
Likewise, we devoted ourselves to repair over six thousand kilometers of pipelines, espe-
cially in Veracruz State, where the works included over 2,400 kilometers of by-passes, to avoid
populated areas, and river crossings substitution, to stop the recurrence of leaks in this re-
gion. Sustaining this effort to correct the accumulated set back, due to a lack of budget for
the maintenance of our pipelines, is an unavoidable commitment of Petrleos Mexicanos.
Being the sole supplier in Mexico of automobile fuels, we understand that our engagement
goes beyond the mere guarantee of the supply: we must assume that the viability of our
company stands also in being able to meet the quality of the needs of our clients. Therefore,
PEMEX seeks to guarantee the supply of automobile fuels with the lowest sulfur content.
For that purpose, the greatest challenge, for the coming years, will be the construction and
modernization of the processing facilities which will enable us to reduce the sulfur content
on gasolines and diesel in more than 90%.
Pemex is immersed in the restatement of its approach as a socially responsible enterprise.
At the end of 2005, we agreed to take a decisive step seeking our adhesion to the Global
Compact United Nations Organization initiative, its goal being to promote and advance the
corporative responsibility and the universal socio-environmental principles, parallel to the
operative and commercial globalization.
Message from the Director
Finally, in the economic issues, 2005 was a year of con-
trasts: we had the highest yield before taxes in the history
of our company, for a total of 506 billion MXP which, com-
bined with the total amount of rights and non classiable
charges of 581 billion MXP also a historical maximum, was
a net loss, for the company, of 76 billion MXP.
This nancial model is not sustainable: we must understand
that in order for Petrleos Mexicanos to remain a company
that contributes to the sustainable development of Mexico,
it has rst to be a nancially viable business. In 2005, the
Mexican Congress authorized a change to the scal regula-
tions for the company, which is a rst step towards that
end. Not withstanding, for the future, the challenge is to
widen this change and complement it with a greater man-
agement autonomy, allowing PEMEX to implement the
best corporate managing practices, in order to be able to
maximize the national hydrocarbons value in the context of
sustainable development, for the benet of all Mexicans.
Regarding this report, it is important to point out that, for
the rst time, it has been prepared according to voluntary
international standards used to inform social, environmen-
tal and economic performance, in a balanced way. This new
procedure has been audited by a recognized third party.
Furthermore, we have participated with Transparencia Mexi-
cana (Transparency International Mexican chapter) in a joint
effort to promote an objective and timely account of the
companys results, which will help to reinforce the trust that
PEMEX, an asset of all Mexicans, must guarantee.
Lui s Ram r ez Cor z o
Di r ect or Gener al
Verication letter
independent from the interest groups
TO THE READERS OF THE SUSTAI NABI LI TY REPORT
We have reviewed the social, environmental and, health and safety informations reliability of the contents of report,
with the realization of the following activities:
Interviews with those in charge of the systems that provided the information of this report
Review of the system used to generate, add and provide the information
Scopes analysis of the information provided
Double check by sampling of the calculations
Double check by sampling and recalculation of added data at the corporative level
Analysis of the tendencies interpretation
Double check by sampling of the information produced by the following subsidiary companies

Based on the work described, we did not nd signicant deviations or omissions in the reviewed information, nor did
we observe other circumstances that could point to inappropriate procedures for securing information.
Other information comprised in the report
We have reviewed the rest of the information included in the report by:
Reviewing the internal documentation, as well as that included in the companys intranet
Reviewing the companys public information as well as that of third parties
Interviews with the heads of departments and with members of the personnel
Consultations with third parties participating in activities or programs mentioned in the report
Based on the above described work, we have not found signicant deviations or omissions in the reviewed informa-
tion, nor have we observed other circumstances that would point to the fact that the information expressed in the 2005
sustainability report, are not appropriately expressed.
KPMG Crdenas Dosal, S.C.
Roberto Cabrera Siles
Mexico, D.F. May 24
th
, 2006
1. Reports content
In order to present a vision of the companys
behavior during the period 2001 - 2005, this re-
port has been designed according to an index
of contents, similar to those used in previous
annual reports. One of the companys goals is
to continue widening and moving forward on
the topics included in this report.
2. Independent verication process
According to the range and conditions estab-
lished in the verication report, included here,
the rm KPMG Crdenas Dosal, S.C. was re-
sponsible for the verication of the data of this
report. The work was carried out by members
of KPMGs verication international team, from
Mexico, Spain and Holland.
The verication included visits to 11 plants and
three hospitals, during which the information
generation process that feeds the companys
systems was reviewed, interviews with per-
sonnel from the corporative units and from the
subsidiary companies, as well as a revision of
the safety and environmental protection data
accounting methods.
The conclusions derived from the revision vis-
its are included in the verication report. The
improvement recommendations are included
in a report to the Directors ofce, delivered by
KPMG on May 3, 2006. They are in the study
stage by PEMEX Directors Ofce.

3. Informations integration
The SISPA system that enables to achieve the
industrial safety and environment protection
in-line monthly report from each of the work
centers was established in 2001. The informa-
tion is captured in each center and is pro-
cessed and compiled for all the subsidiaries.
This is the statistic base that forms this report
relative to the data about emissions into the
air and water, greenhouse effect gases and,
production and consumption of energy and
crude water.
The safety data was obtained by hand consoli-
dation of the subsidiaries reported information.
4. Range limits of the information
Emissions into the air: these are estimates
based on the EPA AP-42 emissions factor, year
2000 supplement F, as well as on the stoi-
cheiometric calculations based on the oxidizers
thermal currents composition and the burn and
vent, of the sulfur recuperation plants.
Water consumption: the data is limited to the
hard water consumption.
Spills: The recording of leaks and spills is in
a review phase. In this report, only those of
hydrocarbons in pipelines are accounted for by
the recently created Subdireccin de Coordi-
nacin de Transporte por Ductos (Pipeline
Transport Coordination Assistant Managers
Ofce), a subdivision of the Direccin Corpora-
tiva de Operaciones (Operations Corporate
Management Ofce).
Frequency and gravity rate: accidents during
transport to/from work, and those caused by
third parties and/or unsafe conditions out of
PEMEX control. The rates reported do not
include after hours worked by non-union
personnel.
I. Introduction
We have been appointed by Petrleos Mexicanos (PEMEX) to review the information and data relating to safety, health
and environmental protection included in their report SAFETY, HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT ANNUAL REPORT 2005,
(from now on the Report) being the Direccin Corporativa de Operaciones de la Compaa (Companys Operations Corpo-
rate Management Ofce) responsible for its elaboration.
II. Scope
The efforts and progress reached by PEMEX for the attainment of a more sustainable development.
To review the report has been our responsibility, as well as to present its readers with a limited assurance about the
following:
The social, environmental and health and safety data contained in the report have been obtained from sources consid-
ered reliable
The information is adequately supported by internal documents or from third sources.
III. Criteria for the review
We have executed our work in accordance to the Standard for Assurance Engagements (ISAE 3000): Assurance Engage-
ments other than Audits or Reviews of Historical Financial Information developed by International Auditing and Assurance
Standards Board. Besides other requirements this standard requires that:
The team that carries out the work must have the specic professional knowledge, skill and competence, necessary to
understand and review the information included in the report, and that its members fulll the requirements of the Pro-
fessional Ethics Code of IFAC that ensures their independency.
When an informations limited assurance is granted, being of a lower level in deepness than a reasonable assurance,
enough evidence in documents and in the companys systems to back up the stated assertions about the company,
must be available.
To this day, there are no existent generally accepted principles to carry out reports that reect a companys sustainable
behavior. PEMEX uses its own criteria when establishing its indicators and their measurement, derived from the Global
Guide Reporting Initiative (2002), as well as the way in which it interacts with its interest groups. At the same time, the
fact that social and environmental information is subject to limitations due to their own nature, as well as the methods to
measure, calculate and estimate, each indicator, must be taken into account. The utilized criteria is detailed in the section
Principles that govern this report.
About the data regarding nancial information and its results, as well as that of outside assurance offered by third parties,
our work was limited to checking that these corresponded to information reviewed by those independent third parties.
IV. Completed work and conclusions
SOCI AL, ENVI RONMENTAL, HEALTH AND SAFETY I NFORMATI ON
In these areas, we have reviewed the contents of this report according to the principles of the AA1000 standard. To this
end we have made an analysis of those contents to identify material information for the interest groups. We have founded
our review of contents, on the investors expectancies, because they are socially responsible and with the highest inu-
ence in the sector, on reports with similar characteristics made in PEMEXs market, on the ethical, environmental and
social behavior of the sectors companies that have an impact on the written press, and on similar matters for which
managerial associations as well as the civil society show interest in the area of inuence of PEMEXs market.
Data about the case studies:
They are based on estimates reached by the
heads of the subsidiary companies, following
their technical criteria. Besides a critical scru-
tiny, there are no more documents concerning
these estimates.

Data from previous years:
The data of previous years may be subject to
corrections through the continuous improvement
process of inventories. These corrections are
mainly due to an improvement in the estimation
factors calculation or to the addition of data from
other sources, that went unrecorded previously.
5. Transparencia Mexicana, A.C.s
participation in the preparation
of this report
PEMEX requested Transparencia Mexicana,
A.C.s support in the elaboration of the
safety, health and environmental protection
report, therefore contributing to the strengthen-
ing of the Mexican societys trust regarding the
information disclosed by the company.
With this goal in mind, Transparencia Mexicana,
A.C. set up a work group that created a question-
naires rst draft of fteen questions related to
the topics included in this report. The question-
naire was sent to PEMEX who answered it, iden-
tifying in each case the support datas chapter
and section in the report.
The answers were examined and in a session
called for this purpose, evaluated by the work
group, in terms of their importance and of the
information disclosed on this matter.
6. Commitment for the improvement
of future reports
PEMEX makes the commitment of a continued
effort in the widening and improvement of the
information it offers the citizens, about a sustain-
able development model in Mexico.
Five years after initiating the operation of the
SISPA, PEMEX will start designing a new infor-
mation system that will increase its indicators
number and reliability.
The company will make a special effort to
widen the reports contents according to the
principles set by Global Reporting Initiative, in its
latest version.

7. Your opinion is important
For suggestions and clarications about this re-
port contact PEMEX, through the e-mail address:
PEMEX Exploration
and Production
PEMEX Gas and Basic
Petrochemicals
PEMEX Refining PEMEX Petrochemicals Medical Services
Integral Active Burgos,
Tamaulipas
Gas Processing Centre Burgos,
Tamaulipas
Madero Refinery, Tamaulipas
Petrochemical Complex Morelos,
Veracruz
Hospital Regional de Reynosa,
Tamaulipas
Drilling Unit Pipeline Sector Offshore terminal Minatitln Regional Hospital,
Veracruz Separation and
compression battery
Storage and distribution
terminal
Pipeline Sector Pipeline Sector
Reporting principles
i i annual r epor t 2005 saf et y, heal t h and envi r onment al pr ot ect i on i i i v annual r epor t 2005 saf et y, heal t h and envi r onment al pr ot ect i on vi
r
e
l
e
v
a
n
t

n
o
t
e
s

a
b
o
u
t

t
h
i
s

r
e
p
o
r
t
Verication letter

Mexico, D.F. May 24
th
, 2006
1. Reports content
accounting methods.

crude water.
Management Ofce).
personnel.
I. Introduction
II. Scope
following:
ered reliable
must be available.
these estimates.

of this report
of future reports
latest version.

PEMEX Exploration
and Production
PEMEX Gas and Basic
Petrochemicals
Tamaulipas
Tamaulipas
Veracruz
Tamaulipas
compression battery
terminal
r
e
l
e
v
a
n
t

n
o
t
e
s

a
b
o
u
t

t
h
i
s

r
e
p
o
r
t
Transparency commitment
TRANSPARENCI A MEXI CANA S REPORT ABOUT I TS CORRELATI ON WI TH PEMEX WI THI N
THE CONTEXT OF THE COMPANY S REPORT ON I NDUSTRI AL SAFETY, HEALTH AND
ENVI RONMENTAL PROTECTI ON, MAY 2006
BACKGROUND
PEMEX asked Transparencia Mexicana, A.C. for its assistance within the process of elaborating this Report on In-
dustrial Safety, Health and Environmental Protection, in order to reinforce the reliance of Mexican society on the
published information, and to identify subjects or issues that could be relevant for the Reports content and should
be enclosed to the data validation that PEMEX publishes along with an external audit report.
Transparencia Mexicana, A.C. presented this proposal to its Board of Directors which approved an experimental
participation in this project, considering that to identify the reach of this kind of social participation will be a valuable
practice for future reports. Transparencia Mexicanas Board of Directors acknowledged PEMEX opening-up to this
matter, and commissioned its executive squad to set up a multidisciplinary work team in order to prepare a ques-
tionnaire on issues they would consider that should be attended by PEMEX within its report on Industrial Safety,
Health and Environmental Protection.
SCOPE
Convinced that this rst effort will allow PEMEX to increase the transparency and accountability over the information
published by the company, both parties dened a method for PEMEX to answer the questions asked by the work
team, which would be evaluated by Transparencia Mexicana.

First of all, Transparencia Mexicana formed a work team which was integrated by Manuel Arango, Humberto Murrieta,
Felipe Prez Cervantes, Luis Rubio and Jos Sarukhn, as Transparencia Mexicanas advisors, and by Lorenzo
Rosenzweig, Rodolfo Silva Casarn and Fernando Ortiz Monasterio, who acted as technical secretary.
The work team prepared a questionnaire of fteen questions concerning the topics of the Report. This integrated
questionnaire is specially aimed to enlighten Mexican society on their concern about PEMEX operations in these
areas. It was sent to PEMEX to be answered. PEMEX answered it, identifying in each answer the sections of the
Report in which the information supporting the response can be found. The answers were examined by the work
team and, during a session especially summoned for that purpose, they were evaluated, according to their rele-
vance and to the available public information on these matters.
RESULTS
The evaluation of PEMEXs answers, carried out by the work team, is summarized in the next chart, supported by
the commentaries that the work team decided to include in the evaluation. The revision was not meant to verify
PEMEX sources and support, which correspond to the external audit contracted for that matter. It was meant to
corroborate the accordance of the answers to the questions. The evaluation was sent to PEMEX for its insertion in
the Report, which, in our opinion, shows clearly the respect and opening-up to Transparencia Mexicanas indepen-
dency in this experimental collaboration.
FI NAL OBSERVATI ONS
When it ended its commission, the work team asked Transparencia Mexicana to include the following observations:
1. We applaud PEMEXs initiative to promote a greater transparency over the preparation and publication of its
reports, particularly in the one regarding Industrial Safety, Health and Environmental Protection.
2. In order to achieve a higher scope on PEMEXs transparency and accountability, and aiming to formulate a
more detailed opinion about the Report and the information included in it, the work team, integrated by Trans-
parencia Mexicana, prompt PEMEX to consider again, for the next annual environmental report, a larger and
timely participation of the organized civil society.
3. The work team, set up by Transparencia Mexicana, considers the comparative analysis of PEMEX and other international
oil companies to be a priority, as well as the study of their tendencies, of improvement or worsening, in the course of time.
4. We trust in the fact that this rst practice, as an experiment, will be the basis to reinforce the relationship between
PEMEX and organized civil society.

Transparencia Mexicana takes on the work teams observations as its own, and makes an invitation to PEMEX, from
now on, to jointly set the basis of a wider and more opportune collaboration for the 2006 report.
ANNEX CHART SUMMARI ZI NG QUESTI ONS AND ANSWERS
1. In accordance with the Decree published in the Federation Ofcial Diary, on January 11, 2002, the compliance
of the Sectorial Program for Energy is mandatory within its elds of competence. In that sense, what kind
of actions does PEMEX implement for the compliance of this program?

In accordance with what it is stipulated in this program, PEMEX has implemented actions in different hubs:

Integration of a institutional network of experts in Efcient Use and Saving of Energy.
Training of more than 400 employees of PEMEX and its Subsidiary Companies, in development of energetic-
environmental diagnosis and evaluation of energetic efciency projects.
Five Campaigns of Efcient Use and Saving of Energy.
Reduction of 22% in the energy consumption per production unit during 2001-2005 period, due to associated
gas aring reduction and to energetic efciency in the work centers operation.
Operation of the Internal Carbon Emissions trading Market
Participation of PEMEXs buildings on the Programa de Ahorro de Energa Elctrica en los Inmuebles de la Admi-
nistracin Pblica Federal (Program of Electric Energy Saving in the Federal Public Administrations buildings).
Energetic diagnosis of main buildings registered on the program, carried out by Comisin Nacional de Ahorro
de Energa - CONAE (National Commission for Energy Saving).
Quarterly follow-up of electric energy consumption of the buildings registered on the program, through
CONAEs web page.
2. Within the context of sustainable development, PEMEX represents the 3% of GDP, the 8% of total exports,
and the 37% of scal income. Considering that total hydrocarbon reserves have systematically decreased
in the last few years, what does PEMEX do to minimize the exhaustion of oil total reserves, as it is a non
renewable natural resource? And, what long term policies does PEMEX have for a foreseeable future when
the hydrocarbons reserves will be exhausted?
Answer included in point c Hydrocarbons reserves, chapter 3 Petrleos Mexicanos in context.

3. Within the context of the use of renewable energy sources (Objectives and goals N 4, 2001-2006 Sectorial Plan
of Development), what does PEMEX do in order to create an infrastructure which would guarantee the supply of
fuels to future generations (Principle N7 of Energetic Policy, 2001-2006 Sectorial Plan of Development).
Petrleos Mexicanos is subject to Energetic Policy, including support policies for renewable energies
which, according to the Organic Law of the Federal Public Administration, are incumbent on the Secretary
of Energys Ofce.
In this context, within its elds of action, Petrleos Mexicanos is technically and economically evaluating the
possibility of introducing ethanol, a renewable fuel, into the gasoline blend he produces.
Likewise, there is a Law initiative which includes, among other issues, that the gasolines to be consumed
in the main urban centers of the country shall contain at least 10% of ethanol based oxygenating
compounds.
In order to ght the environmental pollution, since 1990, PEMEX has used oxygenating compounds as
methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE) in gasoline production. The use of these compounds represents the alterna-
tive of lower cost to reformulate gasolines and ght the problems of contaminant emissions associated with
lead use. The National Rening System has presently an installed capacity to produce these compounds of
12.2 thousand daily barrels. This capacity was built with a calculated investment of 158 thousand pesos
(of 2005) between 1994 and 2002.
The 10% minimum of ethanol use in gasolines, established in this law project, would imply to eliminate
MTBE, and would make PEMEXs investments useless. Moreover, given the differences in the properties
and the handling due to the use of ethanol, it would be necessary to modify the present operation and blend
plan, and the existent infrastructure. The investment required for the use of ethanol in gasolines production
is estimated between 75 and 100 million dollars.
Considering the additional investment, the modications to the present operation and blend plan, and taking
ethanols import price as a reference, PEMEX would need a subsidy that could be higher than 200 million
dollars a year.
These are the conditions of investment and subsidies necessary for Petrleos Mexicanos to be able to
implement the substitution of traditional oxygenating compounds by ethanol.
EVALUATI ON AND
COMMENTARI ES
Very Poor
0-20%
Poor
20-40%
Average
40-60 %
Good
60-80%
Very Good
80-100%
The sectorial program for energy
assigns obligations to PEMEX.
Besides exploration to enlarge its
reserves, PEMEX does not report,
in its answer, to have policies for a
sustainable future after oil, using
alternative sources of energy.
Besides ethanol technical evaluation,
PEMEX does not inform about having
any solar, wind, biomass, microhydraulic
infrastructure or any other kind.
4. Within the context of efcient use of energy, which is the historical tendency and which the future projection
of energetic intensity, measured in energy terajoules, by thousands of barrels of oil, as well, as by millions
of cubic feet of natural gas produced by the company?
Energy consumption corresponding to the companys activities shows a decreasing tendency. Between
2001 and 2005, the energetic intensity rate, expressed in terajoules for each thousand of barrels of crude oil
equivalent
1
, had an average annual decrease of 4.8%, due mainly to a greater use of associated gas.
Energy consumption includes the operation of the four subsidiary companies and products aring. Production
includes crude oil and gas.
When the different cogeneration projects, that are forecasted, will start to operates, the energetic efciency
of the company will register an increase.

5. Which are the advance and the tendency in obtaining ISO 14001 certications and Clean Industry Certicates?
(Objective N7 of 2001-2006 Sectorial Plan of Development).
Answer included in point f Certications, chapter 5 Environmental performance.
6. How PEMEX can be compared to other world class companies, with respect to emissions to air, water and soil,
measured by thousands of barrels of oil, millions of cubic feet of natural gas produced by the company?
PEMEX has not identied available public information of other companies which would allow to make a
consistent comparison in precise terms. Even though the sectors main companies publish data of emissions
to air, discharges to water and soil damage, they do not necessarily publish the relation between these data
and the oil and gas production. Moreover, these data are not necessarily obtained in a similar way nor from
the same sources, which makes it difcult to compare them directly.

7. Which is PEMEXs portfolio of projects to mitigate greenhouse gases emissions? Which is their tendency
and how can they be compared to CO
2
emissions, by thousands of barrels of oil, as well as in millions of
cubic feet of natural gas, produced by other world class oil companies?
The answer to the rst question is included in point b Climate change, chapter 5 Environmental
performance.
The historical records of PEMEXs CO
2
emissions referred to crude oil and gas production show a sustained
level of nearly 8.7 tons of CO
2
per barrel of produced crude oil equivalent.
PEMEX does not have available public information of other companies which would allow to make a com-
parison of the precise terms shown in this indicator. Even though the sectors main companies publish data
of CO
2
emissions, they do not necessarily publish the relation between these data and the oil and gas pro-
duction. Moreover, these data are not necessarily obtained in a similar way nor from the same sources,
which makes it difcult to compare them directly.
8. Within the context of transparency and accountability, as well as regarding the obligation to operate a System
and to establish a Committee of Quality Management (Objective N10 of 2001-2006 Sectorial Plan of Devel-
opment), what has PEMEX done in order to create an indicators system which would be useful to the com-
munity and to the public and private organizations, and how can PEMEXs indicators be compared to those
of Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative?
Since 2002 PEMEX has been working on the implementation of Intragob model, issued by the Federal
Government and based on the following premises:
To improve the quality of the products and services offered by the public sector to citizenship.
To consolidate a quality culture of public service.
To succeed in having a trustworthy and transparent Federal Public Administration.
To render accounts and report results systematically.
To promote resources saving and optimization.
To unify a meaning of continuous improvement, innovation and competitivity on management of Government
ofces and entities.
EVALUATI ON AND
COMMENTARI ES
Very Poor
0-20%
Poor
20-40%
Average
40-60 %
Good
60-80%
Very Good
80-100%
QUESTION SATISFYINGLY SOLVED.
PEMEX does not inform about the
projects it carries out.
1
This includes the energetic equivalence of produced gas, in terms of crude oil.
Based on this model, public institutions work is oriented to fully satisfy the expectations and needs of citizens
and clients of the products and/or services provided by Federal and State Public Administration.
2005 advances report, evaluated by the quality network integrated to that effect, concludes that the maturity
level of institutional processes and systems in force within the company corresponds to 473 points. This
places PEMEX in a 86% of compliance with the Federal Government goal of 550 points for 2006.
Petrleos Mexicanos has not conrmed if Intragob model coincides with the criteria of Extractive Industries
Transparency Initiative.
9. Given the rise of oil price in world market and PEMEXs additional income, in what way these resources
have been used to promote sustainable development in Mexico?
Answer included in point b Main economic results, chapter 3 Petrleos Mexicanos in context.

10. Which is the tendency as for quality and quantity of waste water discharged by PEMEX facilities, and how
these discharges can be compared, by thousands of barrels of oil, as well as in millions of cubic feet of
natural gas, produced by other world class oil companies?
Answer included in point c Water utilization and discharges, chapter 5 Environmental performance.

11. With regard to liquid and gaseous hydrocarbons to air, water (including coast and sea waters), soil and
subsoil, which is the total amount of spills, which is their tendency, how many spills of more than a
barrel have been recovered and how can be all the afore mentioned compared with other world class oil
companies?
Answer included in point c Spills and leaks in pipelines, chapter 4 Industrial safety.

12. Within the context of closure, closing-down and abandon of obsolete infrastructures, especially hydrocarbons
transportation pipelines that are about to reach, or have exceeded their expected average life, what preventive
and repairing actions does PEMEX undertake to revert the increasing tendency of accidents in hydrocarbons
transportation pipelines?
Answer included in point c Spills and leaks in pipelines, chapter 4 Industrial safety.

13. Which was the report of the advances on PEMEX accidents incidence and magnitude (Objective N6 of
2001-2006 Sectorial Plan of Development) and how can they be compared to those of other world class oil
companies, using the Days Away From Work Case Frequency, DAFWCF?
Answer included in point a Personal accidents, chapter 4 Industrial safety.
14. Which policies has PEMEX adopted for the protection of biodiversity and natural areas, susceptible of being
damaged, within the regions where it operates?
Answer included in point b Natural areas, chapter 6 Social responsibility.

15. Which actions does PEMEX have to promote long term communitarian development within the zones
where it operates, and how do they relate to the principles of Global Compact as well as of the United
Nations Millennium Development Goals?
Answer included in chapter 1 Message from the Director General.
EVALUATI ON AND
COMMENTARI ES
Very Poor
0-20%
Poor
20-40%
Average
40-60 %
Good
60-80%
Very Good
80-100%
PEMEX reports percentual advances,
and it would be interesting for the civil
society to have knowledge of the absolute
values expressed in parts by million
and compared to normativity in force.
NO ANSWER
2
.
PEMEX did not present any recovery
programs of infrastructure nor closed
or abandoned pipelines.
The evidence shown by media indicates
a higher number of regrettable
casualties (including civil population)
than the 10 reported by PEMEX. The
sectors frequency rates presented
in the comparative table with other
world wide oil companies deserves an
acknowledgment.
PEMEX did not report policies but
projects. The amount of 57.3 million
pesos is low compared to the additional
and the accumulative impacts PEMEX
has in the ecosystems of Mexico.
Unsatisfactory answer, as PEMEX has
taken on the commitment of being a
socially responsible company. PEMEX
has already published that it subscribed
to the United Nations Global Compact.
2 Its worth mentioning that even though question 11 was not answered individually, questions 11 and 12 are answered jointly in chapter 4,
point c. However, both refer to pipelines and spills issues.
Petrleos Mexicanos is a decentralized public entity of the
Federal Public Administration, duly constituted and legally
existent in accordance to Mexican laws, with legal status
and own patrimony, and whose aim is to exert the central
leading and the strategic management of all the activities
encompassed by the national oil industry, accordingly to the
Ley Reglamentaria (Regulations Law).
The purpose of PEMEX is to maximize the economic value
of hydrocarbons and their derivatives, in order to contribute
to the sustainable development of the country.
1
The PEMEX Code of Ethics is available at www.pemex.com, in section Relaciones con Inversionistas.
The institutional values
1
of PEMEX are:
Leadership
Intelligence and technical capability
Integrity
Creativity and innovation
Team work
Development of human resources
Efcient attention to clients
Quality planning
Planning culture
Proudness about the enterprise, vocation
and commitment
Respectfulness for the environment
Mutual respect
Enthusiasm
Courage
Trust in the personnel
Credibility
Cohesion
Performance evaluation
Petrleos Mexicanos in context
2
Presentation of the PEMEX Safety, Health and Environmental Protection Emergency Strengthening Program by its Director General on
April 29, 2005.
3
From PIW 2004 Rankings, December, 2005. Petroleum Intelligence Weekly.
4
Source: Reservas de Hidrocarburos 2005, available at www.pemex.com, in section Relaciones con Inversionistas.
PEMEX sees to its employees safety and health, as well as to the protection of the environ-
ment. Therefore, its policies include commitments such as the following ruling principles
2
:
The safety, health and protection of the environment are values with the same hierarchy
as production, transport, sales, quality and costs.
All incidents and harms can be prevented.
The safety, health and protection of the environment are the responsibility of all workers
and are work conditions.
In PEMEX, we are committed to continue protecting and preserving the environment, for
the communitys benet.
All PEMEX workers are convinced that the safety, health and protection of the environ-
ment are for our own benet.
Petrleos Mexicanos is the largest Mexican company, with 86 billion USD of total sales, in
2005. It is the sole producer of crude oil and natural gas, and the sole producer of rened
products and only company in Mexico commercializing them.
With a daily average production of 3.3 million barrels, Petrleos Mexicanos is the worlds
third crude oil producer, the rst in offshore production, and the ninth integrated oil company
3
.
Our proven reserves amount to 16.470 billion barrels of crude oil equivalent (BBCOE)
enough for 10 years production, at the rate of 2005
4
.
Our average lifting cost was 4.29 dollars per BCOE in 2005.
Our prot before interests, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) of 55.3 billion
USD places Petrleos Mexicanos in second place among the 10 main integrated oil compa-
nies of the world.
I NFRASTRUCTURE AND MAI N
OPERATI ONAL RESULTS
5
Petrleos Mexicanos runs a wide net of production process-
ing, storage and distribution facilities.
With 742 operative wells and 116 drilling teams in 12 inte-
gral development sites and three region exploration sites,
PEMEX produced daily, in 2005:
3.3 million barrels of oil, and
4.8 billion cubic feet of gas
The nine gas processing centers and the six reneries pro-
cessed daily 3.88 billion cubic feet of gas
6
and 1.28 million
barrels of crude oil, respectively.
With this processing infrastructure, the daily production lev-
els of the main oil products of the system were as follows:
455 thousand barrels of gasolines
63 thousand barrels of jet fuel
318 thousand barrels of diesel
351 thousand barrels of fuel oil
246 thousand barrels of liqueed gas
The seven petrochemical facilities of the system produced
6.1 million metric tons of petrochemical products through-
out the year.
The main storage, distribution and commercialization infra-
structure associated to these operations was:
77 land based storage terminals
15 offshore terminals
17 liqueed gas terminals, and
39.7 thousand kilometers of hydrocarbons transportation
pipelines
7
5
Source: Memoria de labores, available at www.pemex.com, in section Informes.
6
Processed humid gas.
7
Besides, Petrleos Mexicanos has around 21 thousand kilometers of pipelines for the collection and discharge of wells production.
8
Unaudited consolidated financial results report as of December 31, 2005.
9
Source: Informes sobre la Situacin Econmica, las Finanzas Pblicas y la Deuda Pblica / Cuarto
Trimestre de 2005. Available at www.shcp.gob.mx, home page, in section Informacin Diversa.
MAI N ECONOMI C RESULTS
8
In 2005, the main economic variables of the company were:
Total sales for the amount of 928.6 billion MXP, 16% more compared to 2004.
Income before taxes for a total of 506.1 billion MXP, 7% more compared to 2004.
Net loss of 76.3 billion MXP.
In 2005, the income before taxes, rights and non classiable charges was 506.1 billion
MXP, compared against 474.6 billion MXP in 2004. The increase of 7% was mainly due to:
An increase of 28.4 billion MXP of operative yield
A decrease of 0.3 billion MXP of other net incomes
A reduction of 2.8 billion MXP in the integral nancing cost
In 2005, the total amount of taxes, rights and non classiable charges increased 18%
compared to 2004, up to 580.6 billion MXP.
The payment of Petrleos Mexicanos and Subsidiary Companies taxes, rights and non
classiable charges was 62.5% of their total sales plus a non classiable charge on the
surplus yields on crude oil exports (ARE).
According to ofcial data of the Secretara de Hacienda y Crdito Pblico
9
, the receipts
from Advantage on Excessive Yields, generated on 2005 on the basis of an average price
for oil exports higher than 27 dollars, amounted to 43.973 billion MXP.
The distribution of the resources corresponding to each federal entity is based on
the same porcentage structure resulting from the Fondo General de Participaciones
(General Shares Fund) recorded in the Cuenta de la Hacienda Pblica Federal de 2004
(2004 Treasury Account).
HYDROCARBONS
RESERVES
10
The results as of December
31, 2005 show that PEMEX
has proven reserves for
the amount of 16.470
billion barrels of crude oil
equivalent, of which 72%
correspond to crude oil,
11% to plant condensates
and liquids, and the
remaining 17% to dry gas
equivalent to liquid.
69% of the reserves are
developed, meaning the
reserves that can be
retrieved from existing
wells, including those that
ca be retrieved with the
present infrastructure, by
means of a slight update
with moderate investment.
31% of the proven
reserves are not devel-
oped, meaning the
volume we expect to
produce in the future by
drilling new wells.
The potential reserves are
calculated in 15.789 billion
barrels of crude oil equiva-
lent. The sum of these
reserves and the proven
ones constitute the reserve
2P, which totals 32.258
billion barrels of crude oil
equivalent.
The likely reserves total
14.159 billion barrels of
crude oil equivalent which,
added to the proven and
potential reserves, consti-
tute the reserve 3P with a
total of 46.418 billion barrels
of crude oil equivalent.
Among several, the main oil
elds in this category are
Chicontepec, Akal, Maloob
and May.
The total of the reserve 3P
is divided in: 71% of crude
oil, 10% of plant conden-
sates and liquids, and
19% of dry gas equivalent
to liquid.
The restitution of reserves
issue is, with no doubt, of
the highest strategic
importance for the com-
pany. We will be able to
reach the objectives on this
matter only by investing
signicant resources.
Resulting from the invest-
ment in exploration, be-
tween 2001 and 2005, the
rate of restitution of total
reserves of hydrocarbons
increased from 14% to 59%.

This results in the fact that
the annual incorporation of
total reserves went from
216 million barrels of crude
oil equivalent in 2001 to 950
million at the closing of 2005.
Considering the information
as of December 31, 2005,
with an amount of annual
investment in exploration
and production above 10
billion USD in the next four
years, and with a rising
tendency of the amount
intended to exploration, our
expected goal is to reach a
restitution rate in 3P of 75%
for 2006 and 100% for 2010.
Likewise, the goal for the
integrated restitution rate in
1P will rise to reach a rate
of 77% in 2010.
These expected results will
contribute to reinforce
substantially the PEMEX
long term prospects regard-
ing hydrocarbons production
and transformation.
10
Source: Las reservas de hidrocarburos de
Mxico. Evaluacin al 1 de enero de 2006,
available at www.pemex.com, in section
Relacin con inversionistas / estadsticas
operativas / reservas de hidrocarburos.
Crude oil 72% 74% 73% 68% 71%
Plant condensates and liquids 11% 7% 9% 9% 10%
Dry gas 17% 19% 18% 23% 19%
Note: The sums may not coincide due to round off
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
PEMEX Board of Directors
has eleven members: six
representatives of the
Government designated by
the President of Mexico,
including the president of
the board, and ve represen-
tatives of the Sindicato de
Trabajadores Petroleros
de la Repblica Mexicana
(Mexican Oil Workers
Union). There are no
independent counselors in
the Board of Directors.
Presently, the representa-
tives of the Government are
the Secretario de Energa
(Secretary of Energy), who
is the President of the
Board of Directors; the
Secretario de Hacienda y
Crdito Pblico (Secretary
of the Treasury); the Secre-
tario de Medio Ambiente y
Recursos Naturales (Secre-
tary of Environment and
Natural Resources); the
Secretario de Comunicacio-
nes y Transportes (Secretary
of Communications and
Transports); the Secretario
de Relaciones Exteriores
(Secretary of Foreign
Affairs), and the Secretario
de Economa (Secretary
of Economy).
The Organic Law of PEMEX
and its Subsidiary Compa-
nies states that: the
President of the Board shall
be the head of the sector
coordinating entity to which
Petrleos Mexicanos is
ascribed and he will have
casting vote. The sector
coordinating entity is the
Department of Energy.
The members of the Board
of Directors do not receive
any emolument for their
services to the company.
The directors of PEMEX and
its Subsidiary Companies
must carry out their duties
without receiving any
additional benets besides
those established by the
Law. The directors are not
empowered to grant
personal loans with funds of
the company.
The Board has a consultant
Committee whose task is to
emit opinions and recom-
mendations to the Board of
Directors, in the following
issues:
Budgets
Donations
Special payments
The issues specically
proposed by the
counselors and/or stated
by the President of the
Board, or presented
by the Director General.
RI SK MANAGEMENT
In its business common
activities, PEMEX is a party
in trials of various kinds. In
each particular case,
PEMEX evaluates if the
claimed payments do
proceed or not, so as to
determine if it is necessary
to create a contingency
fund should it be the case
of a unfavorable verdict.
PEMEX has no knowledge
of being, or if it might be, a
party of any trial or proce-
dure that may have a
detrimental verdict, for
which it has not created a
contingency fund.
PEMEX has insurance
policies for its properties
and land assets, such as
reneries, processing
plants, pipelines and storage
facilities, as well as for its
offshore facilities, such as
drilling platforms, machinery
and equipment, gas
collection, oating docks
and production facilities.
These insurance policies
cover risks of sudden and
accidental destruction,
as well as extraordinary
expenditures related to
wells operation, such as,
repair and control costs, and
evacuation costs.
PEMEX also has general
civil responsibility insurance
policies covering risks of
environmental responsibili-
ties, including spills.
Besides, it has protection
and indemnity insurance
policies, life insurance for
its employees, as well as
insurance policies for cars,
heavy equipment and
electronic equipment, and
nally hull and cargo
insurance policies for its
marine eet.
In 2005, ten oil workers lost their lives in work accidents.
This irreparable loss for their families and for Petrleos Mexi-
canos has lead us to redene the way in which industrial
safety is managed in the company.

At the beginning of April 2005, the Programa Emergente de
Fortalecimiento a la Seguridad, Salud y Proteccin Ambien-
tal (Emergency program to strengthen the safety, health
and environmental protection) was launched, aiming to stop
a series of industrial accidents, particularly spills occurred in
the facilities of Pemex, and to reverse the incidence tendency
of accidents in late 2004 and along the rst semester of
2005. This program was the result of a joint effort between
the company and the workers union.
industrial safety
Personal accidents
The central element is the homologation and application of a unique
system of integral administration, named PEMEX-SSPA, which,
as any natural evolutionary process and continuous improvement,
incorporates PROSSPAs teachings of success and SIASPAs
advancements, through Operative Discipline, Safety in Processes,
Occupational Health, Effective Audits and Environmental Management
i
n
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l

s
a
f
e
t
y
In 2005, ten oil workers lost their lives in work accidents.
This irreparable loss for their families and for Petrleos Mexi-
canos has lead us to redene the way in which industrial
safety is managed in the company.

At the beginning of April 2005, the Programa Emergente de
Fortalecimiento a la Seguridad, Salud y Proteccin Ambien-
tal (Emergency program to strengthen the safety, health
and environmental protection) was launched, aiming to stop
a series of industrial accidents, particularly spills occurred in
the facilities of Pemex, and to reverse the incidence tendency
of accidents in late 2004 and along the rst semester of
2005. This program was the result of a joint effort between
the company and the workers union.
industrial safety
Personal accidents
The central element is the homologation and application of a unique
system of integral administration, named PEMEX-SSPA, which,
as any natural evolutionary process and continuous improvement,
incorporates PROSSPAs teachings of success and SIASPAs
advancements, through Operative Discipline, Safety in Processes,
Occupational Health, Effective Audits and Environmental Management
i
n
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l

s
a
f
e
t
y
i
n
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l

s
a
f
e
t
y
1.00
1.17
1.09
1.50
1.06
124
133
132
143
117
1.86
1.79
1.54
1.85
0.71
53
40
52
54
27
Petrleos Mexicanos
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
0.56
0.88
1.13
2.00
1.13
139
161
199
210
138
Corporate
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
0.50
1.01
0.92
0.38
0.26
88
114
196
203
250
PEMEX Petrochemicals
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
0.69
1.10
0.63
1.23
1.16
85
138
121
127
93
PEMEX Gas and Basic Petrochemicals
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
PEMEX Refining
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
1.26
1.14
1.35
1.67
1.26
191
154
134
161
143
FREQUENCY SEVERITY
ACCIDENTABILITY RATE 2001-2005
PEMEX Exploration and Production
A strict follow up was made
to 6,495 recommendations
of Comisiones Mixtas de Se-
guridad e Higiene (Safety and
Health Mixed Commissions),
of which 2,718 were carried
out as of December 31 of
the previous year, that is a
42% of attention, continuing
this effort to insure their total
fulllment in the established
schedule.
The technical personnel of
the DCO and the ASIPAS
of the Subsidiary Entities
participated in 53 inspection
visits to 43 facilities consid-
ered critical due to the recur-
rence of personal accidents.
These resulted in 932 recom-
mendations to mend the
cause of those accidents,
of which 380 were rated as
intolerable, and therefore
the corresponding attention
programs were developed.
The Reglamento de Segu-
ridad e Higiene de PEMEX
(Pemex Safety and Health
Regulation) was updated and
optimized, with the participa-
tion of a technical multidisci-
plinary team of the Subsidiary
Entities, considering the
normativity in force and the
best Safety, Health and
Environmental Protection
practices as fundamental
parts of this revision. The most
outstanding improvement
was the addition of three
new chapters concerning the
following topics: Occupational
health, Critical procedures
and Environmental culture,
as well as the suppression
of 217 articles and a rst aid
manual, considered obsolete.
A follow up of the Reinsur-
ance recommendations was
made through technical sup-
port visits to make sure they
were fullled accordingly to
the Reinsurance inspectors
criteria. As a result, from the
388 reviewed recommenda-
tions, 238 have been certied
as completed.
In the context of the emergency program, we
developed evaluation actions for the facilities of
Subsidiary Entities, setting up work plans and programs
for the immediate attention of the most critic risk
conditions. The main actions were:
The severity rate in Petrleos Mexicanos was 117 days lost
per million man work hours, representing a decrease of 18%
compared to the previous year.
The severity rate
1
per Subsidiary Company, except PEMEX
Gas and Basic Petrochemicals, showed a decreasing ten-
dency compared to the previous year, with 143 days lost
in PEMEX Exploration and Production; 138 in PEMEX Pet-
rochemicals, and 93 in PEMEX Rening. In PEMEX Gas and
Basic Petrochemicals it increased 23%, due to the death of
three workers, raising the rate to 250 in 2005, against 203 for
the previous year.
The SSPA Emergency plan ended on December 31, 2005.
In January 2006, the application of the PEMEX-SSPA sys-
tem was started. This implementation is structured in two
phases: a short term one focused to arrest risks, and a sec-
ond one ranging from medium to long term focused in the
improvement and sustainability. The program to implement
the PEMEX-SSPA system will take three years. The specic
programs consist on the application of the 12 best interna-
tional practices, tutoring and training for the systematic use
of Safety, Health and Environmental Protection proven tools,
as well as intensive tutoring of all key personnel.
In parallell, the PEMEX-SSPA system implementation will be
reinforced through a Processes Safety Management Imple-
mentation and Diagnosis Practices Program emphasizing the
follow up of the recommendations emitted by Reinsurance,
Safety and Hygiene Mixed Local Commissions, Task Force,
and Origin Cause Analysis of incidents/accidents.
In the international context, Petrleos
Mexicanos has a performance
equivalent to that of the oil industry.
The results obtained in 2005 are comparable
to those published by some of the main
integrated oil companies
2
1
The number of work accidents and the Frequency and Severity rates do not include accidents occurred on the way to/from work nor those
due to third party actions and/or insecure conditions out of PEMEX control reach.
2
The frequency rate is the ratio of the number of disabling or mortal accidents occurred per million man hours with risk exposure in a given
period, without including the accidents occurred on the way to/from work nor those due to third party actions and/or insecure conditions
out of PEMEX control reach. The data in this graphic have been obtained from public information sources, even though the criteria used
for the calculation by each company may be different.
Due outcome of the activities carried out, we managed to
lower in 26% the number of work accidents
1
, from 526 in
2004 to 391 in 2005. This decrease allowed to revert the
rising tendency of the accidents frequency rate in PEMEX,
reaching its lowest level since 2001, with a total value of
1.06 accidents per million risk exposure man work hours.
This behavior is shown in the results obtained in the differ-
ent business activities of the company: decrease of 25% in
PEMEX Exploration and Production; 6% in PEMEX Rening;
44% in PEMEX Petrochemicals, and 32% in PEMEX Gas and
Basic Petrochemicals, with 1.26, 1.16, 1.13 and 0.26 rates,
respectively.
i
n
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l

s
a
f
e
t
y
SECTOR FREQUENCY RATES
2

1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
PEMEX 5.80 5.30 4.90 4.00 2.68 1.39 1.19 1.00 1.17 1.09 1.50 1.06
BP & AMOCO 2.2 1.8 1.3 1.2 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.4 0.4
A.P.I. PROM. 4.0 3.0 2.5 2.4 1.7 2.5 2.3 1.5
TEXACO 2.8 2.5 2.3 1.6 1.2 1.3
SHELL includes subcontractor 1.6 1.6 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.0 1.0
CHEVRON TEXACO 1.9 2.0 1.7 1.3 1.3 1.1

The severity rate in Petrleos Mexicanos was 117 days lost
per million man work hours, representing a decrease of 18%
compared to the previous year.
The severity rate
1
per Subsidiary Company, except PEMEX
Gas and Basic Petrochemicals, showed a decreasing ten-
dency compared to the previous year, with 143 days lost
in PEMEX Exploration and Production; 138 in PEMEX Pet-
rochemicals, and 93 in PEMEX Rening. In PEMEX Gas and
Basic Petrochemicals it increased 23%, due to the death of
three workers, raising the rate to 250 in 2005, against 203 for
the previous year.
The SSPA Emergency plan ended on December 31, 2005.
In January 2006, the application of the PEMEX-SSPA sys-
tem was started. This implementation is structured in two
phases: a short term one focused to arrest risks, and a sec-
ond one ranging from medium to long term focused in the
improvement and sustainability. The program to implement
the PEMEX-SSPA system will take three years. The specic
programs consist on the application of the 12 best interna-
tional practices, tutoring and training for the systematic use
of Safety, Health and Environmental Protection proven tools,
as well as intensive tutoring of all key personnel.
In parallell, the PEMEX-SSPA system implementation will be
reinforced through a Processes Safety Management Imple-
mentation and Diagnosis Practices Program emphasizing the
follow up of the recommendations emitted by Reinsurance,
Safety and Hygiene Mixed Local Commissions, Task Force,
and Origin Cause Analysis of incidents/accidents.
In the international context, Petrleos
Mexicanos has a performance
equivalent to that of the oil industry.
The results obtained in 2005 are comparable
to those published by some of the main
integrated oil companies
2
1
The number of work accidents and the Frequency and Severity rates do not include accidents occurred on the way to/from work nor those
due to third party actions and/or insecure conditions out of PEMEX control reach.
2
The frequency rate is the ratio of the number of disabling or mortal accidents occurred per million man hours with risk exposure in a given
period, without including the accidents occurred on the way to/from work nor those due to third party actions and/or insecure conditions
out of PEMEX control reach. The data in this graphic have been obtained from public information sources, even though the criteria used
for the calculation by each company may be different.
Due outcome of the activities carried out, we managed to
lower in 26% the number of work accidents
1
, from 526 in
2004 to 391 in 2005. This decrease allowed to revert the
rising tendency of the accidents frequency rate in PEMEX,
reaching its lowest level since 2001, with a total value of
1.06 accidents per million risk exposure man work hours.
This behavior is shown in the results obtained in the differ-
ent business activities of the company: decrease of 25% in
PEMEX Exploration and Production; 6% in PEMEX Rening;
44% in PEMEX Petrochemicals, and 32% in PEMEX Gas and
Basic Petrochemicals, with 1.26, 1.16, 1.13 and 0.26 rates,
respectively.
i
n
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l

s
a
f
e
t
y
SECTOR FREQUENCY RATES
2

1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
PEMEX 5.80 5.30 4.90 4.00 2.68 1.39 1.19 1.00 1.17 1.09 1.50 1.06
BP & AMOCO 2.2 1.8 1.3 1.2 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.4 0.4
A.P.I. PROM. 4.0 3.0 2.5 2.4 1.7 2.5 2.3 1.5
TEXACO 2.8 2.5 2.3 1.6 1.2 1.3
SHELL includes subcontractor 1.6 1.6 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.0 1.0
CHEVRON TEXACO 1.9 2.0 1.7 1.3 1.3 1.1

In 2001, the Subdireccin de Servicios de Salud (Sub-Direc-
tion of Health Services) started the Program of Comprehen-
sive Service to Workers and their Families in the PEMEX
Rening Storage and Distribution Terminals, located in the
West zone and the North of the country. The activities
included the health evaluation of the workers and their fam-
ilies in both aspects, way of life (Preventive Care) and work
exposure (Occupational Health). Besides that, contributing to
the implementation of the Safety, Health and Environmental
Protection Systems (SIASPA-PROSSPA), the Strategic Occu-
pational Health Plan and the Occupational Health Organiza-
tion Manual were emitted, with 25 Operative Instructions
which regulate the medical activities in the working places.
In 2002, the modules of health and incapacities prole were
installed and put in function within the Sistema Integral de
Administracin de la Salud (SIAS Comprehensive System
of Health Management) which record the absenteeism in
coordination with the Human Resources area.

Occupational health
Petrleos Mexicanos policy
concerning Occupational Health is
to take care of its personnel with
regard to their exposure to risks
during the working activities as well as
the circumstances that affect their
capability of performance. PEMEX
seeks to preserve the aptitudes
and wellbeing of its employees, it
protects their sustenance means
and contributes to the competitivity
of the organization
i
n
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l

s
a
f
e
t
y
In 2003, there were 163
Units of Preventive Medi-
cal Services for Workers
on location at the different
work centers. To strengthen
these activities the 2003-
2006 Occupational Health
Strategic Program of which
the main strategic actions
are: to evaluate the health
of 100% workers of each
work center; to control
the risk factors of work-
ing exposure and life style;
to control the incidence
and prevalence of workers
morbidity, and to control the
absenteeism due to health
harm. Additionally, the Oc-
cupational Health Operative
Instructions Manual was
actualized, establishing
four strategic action lines:
Operative Instructions of
General Application, Op-
erative Instructions for the
Surveillance and Control of
the Healthy Worker, Op-
erative Instructions for the
Surveillance and Control of
the Exposed Worker, and
Operative Instructions for
the Surveillance and Control
of the Worker with Harm
to his Health. Likewise,
the Strategic Program was
implemented in the Medical
Preventive Services for
Workers.

In 2004, the work centers
of PEMEX Gas and Basic
Petrochemicals, and PEMEX
Rening participated in the
health weeks.
In 2005, we started the
construction of the Regional
Unit of Occupational Health
in Ciudad del Carmen, in
Campeche State, with the
collaboration of PEMEX
Exploration and Production
and the Northeastern Ma-
rine Region. The objective
of this project was to evalu-
ate the workers physical
and mental capabilities, to
rehabilitate them to work,
as well as to strengthen
those capacities.
We also participated with
PEMEX Rening General
Management Office in
the development of the
Occupational Health
Emergency Program, with
the purpose of strengthen
the workers health and the
facilities safety.

As of December 2005, the
emission of Permanent
Incapacity and Unsuitability
Statements for Workers
decreased 52% relating to
the end of 2002, with the
consequential contention
of indemnity expenses and
work related liabilities. This
was a consequence of the
implementation, in March
2003, of the Procedures
Manual for the Ruling in
Occupational Medical Care.
In 2005, the Industrial Toxi-
cology Laboratory was in-
stalled and put in operation,
with PEMEX Petrochemi-
cals, at the General Hospital
of Nanchital, for the early
detection of alterations, in
workers, due to their expo-
sure to chemical agents, as
well as of genotoxic altera-
tions at the molecular level.
The goals for 2006 of Oc-
cupational Health Strategic
Program are to fulll 100%
the Operative Instructions
of the Annual Operative
Program of the Preventive
Medical Services for Work-
ers of each work center
and to evaluate with it two
strategic indicators for the
Sub-Direction of Health Ser-
vices: average of incapacity
days by worker and per-
centage of healthy workers.
Occupational Health Strategic
Program is a response and
contributes to strengthen
safety, health and environ-
mental protection within
the company.
REGIONAL UNIT OF HEALTH AT WORK, Ciudad del Carmen, Campeche WORKERS HEALTH TRAINING
i
n
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l

s
a
f
e
t
y
Spills and leaks
in pipelines
The most important actions carried out in 2005 to attend
and clean the area were the recovery of 4,000 barrels of
hydrocarbons that were sent to be reprocessed, and the
removal and treatment of 32,000 tons of calla lily, soil and
embankment saturated with hydrocarbons.
In order to determine and gauge the level of the damage,
there were taken 869 soil, 121 sediments and 412 water
samples from the affected area as well as from unaffected
zones, that served as a parameter to measure the restora-
tion work that had to be undertaken.
By December 2005, the soil and sediments restoration
work in the affected banks of the Coatzacoalcos river and
the mangrove swamps was 75% completed. We expect
that the work will be nished in July 2006.
This event was an important milestone for the company,
that lead it to determine, on a national level, the state of the
Hydrocarbons Pipeline Transportation System, with the aim
of preventing this kind of major accidents. Given the fact
that the greatest part of the spills and leaks registered in
2005 took place in the pipeline system, this report centers
its analysis in these events, as well as in the strategies and
measures to decrease future risks.
In 2005, the total of events that happened and were regis-
tered in the Pipeline Transportation System was of 395, of
which 280 were liquid hydrocarbons spills and 115 were
leaks of hydrocarbons in gaseous phase.
Of the spills, 68 (24%) were higher than 5 barrels, of which
67% happened in the states of Oaxaca (7%), Tabasco (13%)
and, noticeable, Veracruz with 32 spills (47%), with a total
spills of 3,368 barrels, affecting approximately 3 hectares
(7.4 acres) of soil.
Related to the 115 leaks, ve of them (4%) ended in signi-
cant consequences, due to the explosion of the products.
Such are the cases of the 10 Cosoleacaque Pajaritos
ammonia pipeline in the Municipio de Nanchital (federal
entity similar to an american county), in State of Veracruz,
and the 48 Escribano-Trinidad gas pipeline in the State of
Tabasco, to mention the most signicant ones.
The principal causes associated to these events are the corro-
sion in the pipelines due to the lack of means for maintenance
in previous years, the damages caused by third parties and
the out of control clandestine taps, that together represent
80% of the causes of spills and leaks.
On December 22, 2004 there
was a re in the Mazumiapans
pumping station, Veracruz, that
caused a rupture in the Nuevo-
Teapa-Poza Rica 30 pipeline
and the spill of 5,000 barrels of
crude oil, affecting 11 Km
along the right bank of the
Coatzacoalcos river, and those
of the Tepeyac, Golapa and
Teapa streams, as well as 2
hectares (4.9 acres) of adjoining
soil and mangrove swamps
On April 13, 2005, in the Muni-
cipio de Nanchital, Veracruz,
there was an ammonia leak,
in the km 20+312 of the 10
ammonia pipeline, that runs
from the Cosoleacaque Petro-
chemical Complex to the Paja-
ritos Refrigerated Terminal.
The leak was caused by an
accidental cut in the pipeline,
by a contractor company,
that compromised the pipes
integrity, causing the release
of 80 tons of ammonia and the
death of six workers of the
said company.
To assure the populations
safety, it was necessary to
move out almost 350 individu-
als to a shelter in the city of
Nanchital. Likewise, medical
attention was ministered, in
situ, to 297 individuals that
presented symptoms of expo-
sure to the gas.
Claims for injuries and damage
to their property were seen to,
which resulted in payments
reaching nearly 582 thousand
MX Pesos.
To attend the immediate en-
vironmental effects, 290 tons
of ammoniacal water were
removed and sent for their
treatment to the Petrochemi-
cal Complexes of Morelos
and Cangrejera. Also, to make
sure there was no remaining
pollution, the Tepeyac stream
and seven wells were physio-
chemically evaluated.
The damaged soils restoration
was done through an in situ
biocorrection by closed circuit
vapor desorption.
On January 16, 2006, the
PROFEPA recovered the
damaged site concluding the
salvage of 7,286 cubic meters
of contaminated soil, over
3,387.33 square meters of
damaged area.
On July 8, 2005, there was a
gas leak in the Escribano-La
Trinidad 48 gas pipeline trap
area, on the 3rd section of the
road Comalcalco-Cunduacn,
in the State of Tabasco, at the
Ranchera Huimango.
The leak caused an explosion
killing four people and hurt-
ing 11 more. Also, around the
leak, 114 vegetation and crop
hectares were damaged by the
ensuing re.
It was necessary to evacuate
775 people from the Ranchera
Huimango, in the Municipio de
Cunduacn and 246 from the
Ranchera Benito Jurez, in the
Municipio de Jalpa de Mndez.
Moreover, 11 PEMEX vehicles
and nine private were damaged
as well as two heavy equip-
ments of a contractor company.
To December 2005, the com-
pany had the characterization of
the damaged site, the essential
evaluation to determine the
correct restoration and refores-
tation techniques. By that time,
90% of the polluted or burned
vegetal matter had been taken
away, for its nal disposal in
biotreatement cells.
As part of the repairing of the
pipeline, a portion of more than
140 meters was replaced.
Important cases
COSOLEACAQUE- PAJARI TOS 10 AMMONI A PI PELI NE THE ESCRI BANO- LA
TRI NI DAD 48 GAS
PI PELI NE TRAP AREA
COSOLEACAQUE, Veracruz
There was a Magna gasoline
spill near the rural zone of San
Lorenzo, Municipio of Xicote-
pec de Jurez in the State of
Puebla, on August 18, 2005.
This happened because there
was a rupture of the pipeline at
the 58+000 section, caused by
a land movement due to the
heavy rains in the mountain
region of the State.
The spill was estimated to be
about 907 barrels, that were
impossible to recover because
of the steepness of the terrain
and the properties of the fuel.
The environmental impact in the
zone was the damage to the
Cilima river and to 187 square
meters of land.
The claims caused a total
payment of 352 thousand MX
Pesos, for the damages caused
to different crop areas and to
farm animals.
As to assisting the affected
population, there was estab-
lished a medical monitoring
system in the communities.
Also, there was put into place
means to provide a supply of
drinkable water and food, as
well as economic aid to
rehabilitate the water reservoir
and the water network.
Because the pipeline is located
in a high vulnerability zone,
there is a plan to change the
location of more than 6 kilome-
ters of pipeline, to a zone not
prone to land shifts, which will
be safer for the environment
and the pipeline.
Meanwhile, several preventive
actions were carried out to
avoid future land movements,
such as land mechanics
studies, and the construction of
gabions on the hills slopes in
order to assure the talus stability.
Important case
THE POZA RICA-CIMA DE TOGO-AZCAPOTZALCO 18
MULTIPLE PIPELINE
Since January 2005, an
intensive maintenance pro-
gram has been carried out.
This includes the inspection
and rehabilitation of critical
pipelines. As a result, the
company has rehabilitated
up to 6,361 kilometers of
pipelines, of which 2,436
are in the State of Veracruz.
To vouch for an efcient
management process of
the pipelines systems
integrity, the company has
established a risk manage-
ment and comprehensive
maintenance techniques
incorporation program
that aims to eradicate the
root causes that originated
failures in the pipelines.
This program groups all
the activities related to the
integrity, operation and
safety into a single process,
which will allow to record
the pipelines conditions
that will serve as a source
of references, in order that
the improvements can be
documented through the
follow up of performance
indicators.

ENVI RONMENTAL LI ABI LI TI ES REMEDI ATI ON: MI NI NG UNI T I N TEXI STEPEC, VERACRUZ
At the same time, the comprehensive maintenance model was redesigned, taking into
account the existing suggestions issued by the PEMEX subsidiaries. This new plan incor-
porates the predictive, preventive and corrective maintenance activities, related to the In-
tegrity Management program.
Within this plan, it is possible to include the follow up of the line rights maintenance pro-
cess, recording the integrity of the pipelines that are housed in it, as well as the usual com-
prehensive maintenance activities of pipeline transportation.

Totals
SPILLS (liquids) LEAKS (Gases) (spills + leaks)

ENTITIES
Registered
number
Estimated
volume
(bls)
Estimated
quantity
(ton)
Registered
number
Estimated
quantity
(ton)
Registered
number
Estimated
quantity
(ton)
PEMEX-Exploration
and Production
1)
226 1,502.00 211.00 102 19.00 328 230.00
PEMEX-Gas and
Basic Petrochemicals
1 481.00 68.00 7 248.00 8 316.00
PEMEX-Refining 55 20,613.00 2,901.00 6 1.00 61 2,902.00
PEMEX-Petrochemicals 1 0.06 0.01 1 80.00 2 80.01
Total PEMEX 283 22,596.06 3,180.01 116 348.00 399 3,528.01
1)
The table includes only the spills and leaks of the pipeline hydrocarbon transportation system
2005 SPI LLS AND LEAKS RECORD
SPI LLS AND LEAKS
I N MAJOR PROCESSES
FACI LI TI ES
Included in this type of
facilities are, mainly, the re-
neries, the gas processing
centers and the petrochemical
complexes. According to the
records of each one of
the subsidiary companies,
only PEMEX-Rening had
four events, of which three
were spills estimated in
1,256 barrels and one was
a leak estimated in 500 kilo-
grams of uorhydric acid.
Objective:
To eliminate the environ-
mental liability which charac-
teristics are: acid residues of
dams, contaminating solid
residues, wells producing
sulfur and hydrocarbons.
Description:
Neutralization of acid dams.
Installation of a stabilization
cell for the nal encapsula-
tion of the coal with sulfur
residues.
Dosage process of the magnesium oxide Residues stabilization cell
Successful case
Results:
Neutralization of more than
939 acres and nearly 424 million
ft
3
of water with a similar
acidity to that of the highest
corrosive acids (pH=0.6 to 2.6).
Final encapsulation of more
than 500 thousand tons of
coal with sulfur residues.
This environmental liability was not caused by PEMEX. In 1994, the Federal
Government assigned this parcel to PEMEX as a payment of the Compaa
Exploradora del Istmo debts. It was then constituted as the Unidad Minera
Texistepec (Texistepec Mining Unit). Pemex took the responsibility to elimi-
nate this environmental risk.
Amount of the investment:
825 million MXP
Amount as of the nancial year of
2005: 356 million MXP
Emissions to air
Emissions to air are mainly
compounds generated
by hydrocarbons combustion
and evaporation, as well
as sulfur-ow combustion.
These emissions are
the cause of undesirable
environmental effects
e
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l

p
e
r
f
o
r
m
a
n
c
e
During the period 2001-2005, the accounted emissions to air showed an annual average
reduction of 7%, with 715.0 thousand tons in 2005 against 955.5 thousand tons in 2001.
Of these total emissions to air, the 60.8% was emitted by PEMEX Rening, the 23.4% by
PEMEX Exploration and Production, the 12.7% by PEMEX Gas and Basic Petrochemicals,
and the remaining 3.1% by PEMEX Petrochemicals.
environmental
performance
SULFUR OXI DES EMI SSI ONS
These SO
X
emissions represented the 71% of total emis-
sions to air accounted by PEMEX during the period 2001-
2005, and showed an annual average decrease of 6.9% with
516.9 thousand tons in 2005 compared to 668.5 thousand
tons in 2001.
During this period, PEMEX Rening contributed with the
69.5% of total SO
X
emissions to air, PEMEX Exploration and
Production with 18.3%, PEMEX Gas and Basic Petrochemical
with 11.6%, and PEMEX Petrochemical with 0.6%.
SO
X
emissions from combustion in equipments called x
sources (boilers, furnaces and direct-red heaters) are the
only emissions regulated by environmental authorities. They
represent the 32.4% of total SO
X
emissions and fulll the
conditions of normativity; the remaining 67.6% of emissions
has not yet been regulated.
1
Norma Oficial Mexicana NOM-085-ECOL-1994
Contaminacin atmosfrica (Mexican Official
Norm -1994 Atmospheric pollution).
e
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l

p
e
r
f
o
r
m
a
n
c
e
The emissions of SO
X
are the major precursor
of acid rain which harms health besides
causing corrosive damages to facilities and
to workers and inhabitants properties. For
that reason PEMEX has taken measures to
reduce these emissions
SOURCES OF SULFUR
OXI DES EMI SSI ONS
The sulfur oxides emissions
are produced mainly by
aring, combustion pro-
cesses and also in oxidation
equipments. Gas and liquid
ow burners produced the
49.5% of SO
X
emissions
during the period 2001-2005,
with an annual average
decrease of 11.2%.
This tendency to drop of
SO
X
emissions to air is
mainly due to the fact
that, in the offshore oil
platforms, the aring of
sour gas has been reduced,
as it is used to increase the
natural gas supply.

The emissions from com-
bustion in heating, vapor
and energy generation
equipments represented
37.3% of total emissions
during that period, with an
annual average increase
of 3.8%.
SO
X
emissions in oxidation
equipments contributed
with 13.2% of total emis-
sions, which represents an
annual average decrease
of 15% during the period
2001-2005, due essentially
to the installation of sulfur
recovery plants in the Gas
Processing Centers.
During 2006, the sulfur
recovery plants, of two
reneries with deciencies
in these aspects, will be
rehabilitated, as they are
located in Salamanca an
Tula which are two zones
that are susceptible to be
affected.
Likewise, PEMEX will col-
laborate with SEMARNAT to
elaborate a norm regulating
the sulfur recovery efciency
in reneries, in order to ll
this normative void.
PEMEX EXPLORATI ON AND PRODUCTI ON: NORTHEASTERN MARI NE REGI ON
EMI SSI ONS ASSOCI ATED GAS I MPROVEMENT EXPLOI TATI ON
Successful case
Objective:
To maintain production lev-
els of Activo Cantarell.
To increase the production
of Activo Ku-Maloob-Zap.
To increase the compression
capacity and development of
associated gas.
To reduce contaminant
emissions to atmosphere.
Description:
Design, construction and
operation: 10 modules
with high pressure turbo-
compressors equipments
with a total compression
capacity installed of 1,170
MDCF, a humid sweet gas
dehydration plant and sour
gas sweetening towers.
Results:
Estimated capacity (*) of
contaminant gases reduc-
tion per year:
648.3 M ton of SO
X
17.6 M ton de NO
X
15,734.7 M ton of CO
2
1,421.1 M ton of CH
4
The development of ad-
ditional capacity for 1,170
MDCF and 100,000 bpd of
condensate gasolines.
Investment: 1,207 MUSD
e
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l

p
e
r
f
o
r
m
a
n
c
e
OFFSHORE PLATFORMS
* For the estimate of emis-
sions reduction, we con-
sider 1,170 MDCF of sour
gas containing 2.18 % Mol
of H
2
S.
Successful case
PEMEX Gas and Basic Petrochemicals initiated an important
investment program for the construction of sulfur recovery
plants and to reduce the sulfur dioxide emissions produced
during the acid gas sweetening process in the Gas Process-
ing Centers (Centros Procesadores de Gas - CPG).
With an investment of 400 million dollars, until now, twelve
sulfur recovery plants have been installed, with Super
Clauss technology, reaching a sulfur recovery efciency
level of 99%, higher than national and international norms,
and reducing by half the sulfur dioxide emissions in oxida-
tion equipments.
All Gas Processing Centers have this technology, except
CPG Matapionche where there is the project of building a
new plant.
With these actions PEMEX showed with facts its resolution
to eliminate environmental risks, even when they are not
included in a norm.
As a consequence of all above mentioned, PEMEX Gas
and Basic Petrochemicals collaborated with SEMARNAT to
elaborate the Norma Mexicana NOM-137-SEMARNAT-2003
to control the emissions of sulfur compounds in sour con-
densed compounds and gas desulfuration plants, homolo-
gated with the standard of the Environmental Protection
Agency of the United Stated of America.
GAS PROCESSING CENTER
e
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l

p
e
r
f
o
r
m
a
n
c
e
Climate Change
Climate change is one of the most important problems that
our planet will face in the XXI Century. To avoid alterations on
the climate system, to improve the human development and
wellbeing levels, as well as a sustainable economic growth,
implies an important technological and social challenge.
Climate change is partly a consequence of the greenhouse
gases emission (GHG) such as carbon dioxide (CO
2
), meth-
ane (CH
4
) and nitrous oxide (N
2
O).
The Kyoto Protocol (KP), established by the United Nations
Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), which
entered into force on 16 February, 2005, compels 38 devel-
oped countries (Annex 1 Parties) to reduce the greenhouse
gases emissions a 5.2% of 1990 registered emissions levels.
The CDM allows Annex 1 countries to earn certied emission
reduction credits (CERs), or carbon credits for investment
in emission reduction projects in non-Annex 1 countries.
CERs generated from CDM project activities can then be
used by Annex 1 countries to offset their national emission
reduction commitments.
Mexico is not bound to reduce its greenhouse
gases emissions; nevertheless, it participates in
Kyoto Protocol through the Clean Development
Mechanism (CDM)
2001- 2005 PERFORMANCE
PEMEX keeps a historical record of its CO
2
emissions, and
it is in the process of integrating reliable inventories of the
other greenhouse gases, especially methane.
Petrleos Mexicanos generates about the 5.6% of CO
2
na-
tional emissions. During the period 2001-2005, as a result of
investments in projects and operative improvement actions,
we can appreciate a tendency to drop in CO
2
emissions.
During that period, CO
2
emissions decreased a 6.5%, drop-
ping off from 40.0 million in 2001 to 37.4 million tons in 2005.
The annual average reduction was of 1.7%.
In 2001, the project of greater impact in emissions reduc-
tion was the installation of two heat recovery facilities for
vapor generation, in the Cactus Gas Processing Center.
Since 2002, PEMEX main strategy to reduce CO
2
emissions
has been the beginning of the operations of compression
platforms on the Gulf of Mexico, in order to increase the use
of natural gas.
The levels of CO
2
emissions due to offshore gas aring de-
creased from 400 thousand tons a month to 100 thousand,
during the period 2001-2005.
In 2003, there was a 7.2% increase of the CO
2
emissions,
mainly due to the activities regularization of Cadereyta and
Madero reneries, after their reconguration.
CANGREJERA PETROCHEMICAL CENTER, Veracruz State
The lower CO
2
emissions were
obtained in the Salamanca,
Madero and Tula reneries, due
to the reduction of heavy fuel
oil consumption
2004- 2005 PERFORMANCE
A 2.8% reduction of CO
2

emissions was attained in
relation to the previous year,
dropping off from 38.5 mil-
lion tons to 37.4 million.
The contribution in CO
2

emissions by subsidiary
companies, during 2005,
was as follows: PEMEX
Refining generated the
42.0%; PEMEX Explora-
tion and Production the
26.4%; and, in a lesser
proportion, PEMEX Petro-
chemicals 16.0% and
PEMEX Gas and Basic
Petrochemical 15.6%.
During this last year, CO
2

emissions, in exploration
and production activities,
decreased due to the
secondary recovery through
CO
2
injection in Sitio
Grande Field, in Chiapas
State. Likewise, in Activo
Cinco Presidentes, in
Tabasco and Veracruz
States, the gas aring was
prevented. The gas was
used in La Venta Gas
Processing Center and in
the construction of Shishito
gas pipeline for gas han-
dling and transportation to
Jos Colomo Field com-
pressors, in Tabasco State.
Thanks to the Air Quality
Improvement Program
(Programa de Mejora de
Calidad del Aire - PROAIRE)
a CO
2
reduction has been
accomplished, in a greater
extent in the Salamanca,
Madero and Tula reneries
as they used heavy fuel oil
with lower sulfur contents.
The main opportunity area stands in the
commercialization of the GHG reductions
through CDM projects
2006 PROGRAMS AND GOALS
e
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l

p
e
r
f
o
r
m
a
n
c
e
METHANE TO MARKET

As part of the international
effort to ght climate
change, in November 2004,
the Methane to Market
(M2M) initiative was
launched. Its goal is to
promote and use projects
to capture methane in 17
oil and gas producers
countries, that participate
voluntarily in this program.
Representing Mexico,
PEMEX co-presides, with
the Russian Federation, the
Subcommittee of the Gas
and Oil Industry, with the
mail goal of identifying,
in April 2006, at least two
pilot projects to be applied
in PEMEX Petrochemicals
and PEMEX Gas and Basic
Petrochemicals facilities.
NUEVO PEMEX
COGENERATI ON
PROJECT
Today, the Nuevo PEMEX
Gas Processing Center uses
electric energy produced by
its auxiliary services plant
and it uses fuels to gener-
ate high pressure vapor.
These operations are car-
ried out with low efciency
levels and therefore at high
costs and with additional
carbon dioxide emissions.
Starting the process for the
protable use of the CDM,
PEMEX has identied proj-
ects with a potential of CO
2

emissions reduction esti-
mated in almost 6 million
tons a year. It is expected
that, in 2006, the rst
reductions will be obtained
and, for the end of the same
year, the validation of, at
least, ve CDM projects.

In this sense, Petrleos
Mexicanos has established
technical alliances with
companies of Annex 1
countries of Kyoto Protocol,
with the World Bank and with
other main nancial institu-
tions in the carbon credits
international market.
In order to satisfy the energy and vapor requirements of
this work center in a more efcient way, there is a project
to build a cogeneration plant with an efciency level of 70-
80%, almost twice the actual level. During 2006, the bid-
ding procedures for this project will be ended.
It is estimated for this plant to start its activities in 2009,
with the generation of 291 MW, 15.5% for the consumption
of Nuevo PEMEX GPC, and 84.5% for the consumption of
other PEMEX facilities within the country.
NUEVO PEMEX GAS PROCESSING CENTER, Tabasco State
Successful cases
PEMEX RECEI VES FOUR 2005 NATI ONAL PRI CES ON THERMAL ENERGY SAVI NGS
The Secretara de Energa (Secretary of Energys Ofce) awarded Cadereyta Renery, and
La Venta and Poza Rica Gas Processing Center, four 2005 National Prices on Thermal En-
ergy savings, in the Facilities Modernization category.
For the second consecutive year, the rst price was for Ing. Hctor R. Lara Sosa Renery,
in Cadereyta, Nuevo Len, for the modernization of direct-red heaters and for increasing
the thermal efciency in the equipments. With these actions an annual saving of 150,000
barrels of crude oil equivalent (BCOE) was obtained.

The La Venta Gas Processing Center, in Tabasco State, obtained two second prices: for hav-
ing refurbished the gas turbo-generator of the services section, which permitted to raise
the average rate of the heat increase; and for installing burners with high efciency and low
contaminant emissions, which helped to obtain annual savings estimated in 134,000 BCOE.
CADEREYTA REFINERY, Nuevo Len State POZA RICA GAS PROCESSING CENTER,
Veracruz State
LA VENTA GAS PROCESSING CENTER,
Tabasco State
e
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l

p
e
r
f
o
r
m
a
n
c
e
The Poza Rica Gas
Processing Center, in
Veracruz State, received
the third price, for the
modernization of gas
sweetening process, which
favored daily savings
estimated in 100 BCOE
PEP: I MPROVED RECOVERY PROCESS BY CO
2
RE- I NJECTI ON I N
CARMI TO- ARTESA PROJECT ( 2002- 2005)
Objective:
Implement mechanisms to
maintain pressure in mature
elds to improve their hy-
drocarbons recovery factors
and maximize the reserves
recovery through the injection
of 40MDCF of CO
2
.
Description:
The Carmito eld is located
43 km to the southwest of
Villahermosa, in Tabasco
State. A compression station
was installed, the necessary
infrastructure was built,
and two CO
2
injection wells
were conditioned.
Benets:
- Since 2002, the non-vented
to atmosphere CO
2
volume
has been of 30,000 MCF.
- An additional volume ob-
tained through improved
recovery of almost a million
barrels during the period
2002-2005.
- An additional volume of
hydrocarbon gas recovered
during injection of 2,400 MCF
during the period 2002-2005.
SEPARATION
PLANT
COMPRESSION
EQUIPMENT
Artesa-15
INJECTOR WELL
Regarding water, in Mexico, the three main problems relate
to its availability, its management and its pollution.

In some processes of oil industry, the use of water is intense
and the volumes of waste water discharges are quite im-
portant. For this reason, Petrleos Mexicanos actions in this
matter are focused on the efcient use of this resource and
the normative compliance.
Although the production and the number of facilities has in-
creased during the period 2001-2005, the record of the use of
crude water presents a 19.7% decrease, dropping from 238
to 191 million cubic meters a year.
As for the waste water discharges, they decreased 27.2%,
dropping from 92 to 67 million cubic meters, during the same
period, as it is shown in the graphic.
These results are mainly due to the construction and opera-
tion of the urban-industrial waste water treatment plants in
Minatitln and Salina Cruz Reneries, as well as in different
Gas Processing Centers, Offshore and Storage and Distribu-
tion Terminals.
Besides the great projects carried out during the 90s de-
cade, and the beginning of this one, the actions of efcient
use of water during the last few years has allowed to con-
tinue with the tendency to drop, recording a 3.5% decrease,
during the two years 2004-2005, in the use of crude water,
dropping from 198 to 191 million cubic meters a year. This
has been possible thanks to the actions to improve the pre-
cision of the water balances, the rehabilitation of cooling
towers, the recycling and use of streams in different facilities,
as well as the reuse of stripped waters which are now sent
to desalination plants.

Regarding waste water discharges volume the results were
not as successful. In 2005, it increased 11.7% compared
to 2004. This was due to the rehabilitation of lines against
re and failures on the measuring system in petrochemicals
and rening plants. Nevertheless, the commitment to the
compliance of the maximum limits established in the norms
was respected.
Water utilization and discharges
e
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l

p
e
r
f
o
r
m
a
n
c
e
Concerning the programs
and actions for 2006, in Oc-
tober, in Cantarell Field, the
construction of a module,
for complementary works,
between Akal C7 and Akal
C8 platforms will be n-
ished. The total investment
of 75.2 million MXP includes
the construction of an oily
sour waters treatment plant
and an ozonication sys-
tem which, as it has been
calculated, will permit to
discharge the efuent to the
sea, in compliance with the
environmental normativity.
Urban Waters Treatment Plant,
MINATITLN REFINERY
Waste Water Treatment Plant,
SALINA CRUZ REFINERY
Although these plants will
not operate until 2008, it is
important to point out that,
during this year the bid-
ding of the Urban Waters
Treatment Plant in Madero
Renery will be carried out
to treat 900 lps (liters per
second) of sewage of the
Tampico-Madero zone, of
which 600 lps will be used
as replacement water for
the cooling towers, repre-
senting a consumption of
18.9 million cubic meters a
year of fresh water, 9.9%
of Petrleos Mexicanos
total in 2005.
In addition, Cadereyta
Renery is negotiating the
construction of a water de-
mineralizing plant for vapor
generation, which includes
the supply of ultraltra-
tion packages and inverse
osmosis to treat 166 lps
of sewage. The total cost
is estimated in 380 million
MXP. With this investment
the production costs will be
reduced and there will be a
greater operative exibility.
WASTE WATER TREATMENT PLANTS
With this infrastructure the fresh water saving potential is
22.2 million cubic meters a year, with the plants operating 100%.
PLANT
DESIGNED CAPACITY
lps (liters per second)
INVESTMENT
Millions of US Dollars
OPERATIONS
Inverse Osmosis of sea water to be used
in cooling towers and vapor generation in
Salina Cruz Refinery.
256 40.6 2001
Salina Cruz Urban Waters Treatment
to be re-used in cooling towers.
90 8.4 2002
Industrial Waste Water Treatment from
the Minatitln Refinery.
241
39.8
2001
Minatitln Urban Waters Treatment
to be re-used in cooling towers.
116 2001
I NVESTMENT ON WASTE WATER TREATMENT SYSTEMS
CONSTRUCTI ON AND OPERATI ON OF URBAN- I NDUSTRI AL
WASTE WATER TREATMENT PLANTS
Due to the size of the volumes of treated water, the most
important works in the last years have been the waste water
treatment plants of Minatitln and Salina Cruz reneries, in the
States of Veracruz and Oaxaca respectively. There was an in-
vestment of 88.8 million dollars, and the capacity of water treat-
ment is 703 lps (liters per second), as it is shown in the table.
Successful case
Waste water discharges
Oil and grease are the typical contaminants from oil industry. Nevertheless, the Oxygen
Biochemical Demand, which represents the amount of oxygen consumed by microorgan-
isms during the biochemical oxidation of organic matter, indicates the quality of a waste
water when all the organic contaminants are added up. This is why it is included for the
rst time in the annual report.
The handling of liquid hydrocarbons imply risks of losses, related to the operation and main-
tenance of driving and process equipments, which are usually driven through drain systems
to efuents treatments for their recovery.
e
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l

p
e
r
f
o
r
m
a
n
c
e
Oil extraction generates other contaminants, as the chlo-
rides found in produced water. Hydrocarbons treatment and
rening produce the sour water, which contains sulfur com-
pounds. In the production of water vapor the streams emit-
ted contain important quantities of solved solids. Moreover,
there are minor efuents with the particular characteristics
of the chemical processes which originate them.
Petrleos Mexicanos has primary, secondary and third waste
water treatments, according specically needs, and with
the purpose of complying with the normativity of waste
water discharges.
The graphic shows the contaminant discharges of the pa-
rameters oil and grease, and OBD
5
. We can appreciate a
reduction of 57% for O&G and 53.6% for OBD
5
, during the
last ve years.
e
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l

p
e
r
f
o
r
m
a
n
c
e
The waste water treatment
plants allow the liquid to be
reused and this reduces the
volumes discharged into
the recipient bodies. In ad-
dition, they reduce the con-
taminant charge, because
the treated surplus are sent
as a discharge, in compliance
with the environmental nor-
mativity: NOM-001-SEMAR-
NAT-1996 or Discharge
Special Conditions.
In the last two years the
quality of discharges,
represented as DBO
5
, has
maintained its tendency to
drop, having reduced the
contaminant charge in
8.6%, as a result of the
complementary actions
described in section Water
Utilization and Discharges.
Oil and grease increased in
14.4% during the same
period, due to a greater
number of perforation units
in PEMEX Exploration and
Production activities. It was
also due to the cleaning of
patios and drains with the
rehabilitation works of re
systems and drains segrega-
tion in petrochemicals, in-
creasing, by dragging effect,
the hydrocarbons contribution
to the efuents treatment.
Aiming to improve the
environmental performance
in this aspect, during 2006,
there is a project, among
others, of concluding the
construction of the rain col-
lector in Cadereyta Renery.
The purpose is to avoid
merging industrial waters
with rain waters, recover-
ing the latter in a hydrologic
basin especially critical,
avoiding also the chronic
risk of contaminating the
neighboring properties.
OXIDATION AND STABILIZATION LAGOONS
The waste water treatment plants
permit the liquid to be reused and they
reduce the volumes discharged into
the recipient bodies
Successful case
CONSTRUCTI ON AND OPERATI ON OF SOUR WATER
TREATMENT PLANTS
Oil rening generates water ows with high levels of sulfur
compounds. This is why it is qualied as sour.
The elimination of 99% of these compounds is carried out
in sour water treatment units, obtaining a water with the
adequate quality to be reused in other processes, sending
the surplus to efuents treatment.
With the reconguration of Madero and Cadereyta Reneries,
5 units were constructed for the handling of additional con-
tributions of new processes, with a treatment capacity of
2.902 million cubic meters per year, which represents 1.5%
of total crude water used for production of rening in 2005,
as it is shown in the table.
CADEREYTA REFINERY: Bunker of processes advanced
control, including sour water plants
e
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l

p
e
r
f
o
r
m
a
n
c
e
Operations start up
2001
2003
Sour wat er t r eat ment pl ant s

3 units in Cadereyta Renery
2 units in Madero Renery
Desi gned capaci t y
Barrels/day
30,000
20,000
New Sour Water Treatment Plants
Hazardous waste
Petrleos Mexicanos processes and operations generate
wastes. Some of them are classied as hazardous by the
environmental regulation.
Oil wells drilling and maintenance produce drill cuttings; the
processing and handling of liquid hydrocarbons create,
mainly, oily sludges; and chemical and rening processes
also create chemical wastes and spent catalysts. These are
the primary industrial residues, even though there have
been special cases of a single generation of polychlorinated
biphenyls, leaden muds and hexachlorinated residues, which
have been successfully handled and removed.

Since the national regulation regarding hazardous wastes
entered into force at the beginning of the 90s, Petrleos
Mexicanos has modied its activities though different ac-
tions. It has segregated and minimized waste generation,
applied specialized treatments, recycled and at rst instance,
searched for waste revaluation.
The efforts have been permanent, as it is shown in table
N1; the hazardous wastes, that due to their toxicity, have
been eliminated in the last years from PEMEX facilities.
YEAR FACILITY DISPOSAL
tons
TECHNOLOGY
2002 Minatitln Refinery 430.1 Tetraethyl lead base antiknock additive. Sold abroad for its
treatment and re-utilization.
2002-
2003
Cadereyta, Minatitln and
Salamanca Refineries
55.1 Leaden muds. Incineration in Europe.
Debit of 16,971 million pesos.
Included the decontamination of 34 containers
which were later discarded as scrap
for steel foundry.
2003 Azcapotzalco Ex-refinery 22.4 Leaden muds. Incineration in Europe.
Sourcing of 4,455 million pesos.
Included the decontamination of 3 containers which were
later discarded as scrap for steel foundry.
2004 11 Refining
facilities
151.9 Polychlorinated biphenyls. Incineration in Europe.
2005 Salamanca Refinery 17.97 Treatment and co-processing of spent sodium hydroxides.
Table N1 Examples of toxic residues disposal.
MINATITLN REFINERY:
Elimination of leaden muds and tetraethyl lead
base antiknock
Treatment, with technology authorized by
SEMARNAT, of transformers internal equipments
which contained PCBs
The graphic shows the evolution of the generation and disposal of hazardous wastes during
the last ve years, with a grater activity in 2004 and 2005, especially in PEMEX Exploration
and Production.

It is important to notice that toxic wastes, of a sole time generation, as 2004 PCBs, are not
really generated by oil activities. In that case they corresponded to transformers acquired
by the company during the time when their use and production were world-wide allowed.
During 2005, extraordinary measures were taken to reduce the inventory obtaining, at the
end of the year, the lowest level in the companys historical records.
In rening, the disposal of oily sludges was especially important, as it is shown in table N2.
Also, it is important to mention the disposal of 5.2 thousand tons of wastes containing
heavy chlorinated hydrocarbons and 18 thousand tons of spent sodium hydroxides.

Generation and disposal
of hazardous wastes
This results are complemented by opportune and adequate disposal of drill cuts within the
wells drilling and maintenance areas. These generated 551.4 thousand tons, from which
there was a disposal of 550.0 thousand, avoiding their accumulation.
To continue with the reduction of inventories, during 2006, PEMEX Rening will proceed to
the disposal of 18 thousand tons of oily sludges and 600 tons of biological sludges.
Additionally, in order to comply with the schedules stipulated in the General Law for Pre-
vention and Integral Management of Wastes, there are negotiations with the Secretara de
Hacienda y Crdito Pblico to obtain a multiannual operation budget for most of the work
centers with a high generation of wastes, for their opportune elimination.
From 2006, drill cuttings will be considered as special handling waste, in accordance to the
changes to normativity, which will reduce the costs almost to half.
A viable technological alternative would be to inject them into geological formations at more
than 2,000 meters depth, resulting in additional savings.
FACILITY DISPOSAL ACTIONS
MINATITLN REF. 28,716 ton Treatment by thermal desorption.
MADERO REF. 15,450 m
3
Treatment to elaborate materials for road construction.
TULA REF 4,000 m
3
Thermal treatment and destruction.
CADEREYTA REF. 3,600 ton Treatment and coprocessing in a cement furnace.
TUXPAN OFFSHORE
TERMINAL
14,313 m
3
Treatment with application in roads and thermal destruction.
TABLE N2. 2005 Disposal of Oily Sludges
Successful case
DISPOSAL OF 29 THOUSAND TONS OF OILY SLUDGES IN
MINATITLN REFINERY
During 100 years of the renery operation, the oily sludges were
stored in rustic pits where the product was recuperated and the
sediments were accumulated.
In 2004, the decision was made to considering them as hazard-
ous wastes. With a previous quantication, the amount assigned,
in 2005 budget was 26.96 million MXP for their elimination by
thermal desorption, method authorized by SEMARNAT obtaining
a signicant reduction in the oily sludges inventory.
TULA REFINERY: handling of oily sludges
stored in temporary confinement cells for its
co-processing
MINATITLN REFINERY: haulage of oily sludges for their
later treatment by thermal desorption
MADERO REFINERY: Oily sludges stored in a
concrete dike, and which disposal was made
in 2005
e
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l

p
e
r
f
o
r
m
a
n
c
e
CLEAN I NDUSTRY
During 2005, the number of
Clean Industry Certicates,
derived from environmental
audits carried out within
the Environmental Audit
National Program (Progra-
ma Nacional de Auditora
Ambiental - PNAA) of
PROFEPA, kept the same
level as in 2004. This was
due to the fact that most of
the work centers could
endorse the certicates
validity date because they
had maintained the ad-
equate standards regarding
the fulllment of the initial
recommendations of their
audits and the enforcement
of environmental regulation.
Certications
I SO CERTI FI CATES
There is a tendency to
reduce ISO-9001 e ISO-
14001 certications. The
experience obtained in
these systems has tran-
scended the individual
certication for comprehen-
sive certication, which
include all the work centers
of one line of business.
A good example is PEMEX
Petrochemical that had
received eight ISO-9001
and one ISO-14001 certi-
cate, and obtained one
single certicate for each
ISO, valid for all Petrochem-
ical Complexes of this
Subsi-diary Company.
Likewise, PEMEX Gas and
Basic Petrochemical
obtained the certication for
the norm OHSAS 18001:1999
regarding occupational
health management sys-
tems, which is a comple-
ment to the certications it
had obtained regarding
quality and environment.
I SM
In compliance with interna-
tional agreements, the
certication in the Interna-
tional Code IGS/ISM
(International Safety Man-
agement) must be main-
tained. The objective of this
certication is to establish a
management system for
safe operation and
pollution prevention from
ships and their operating
offshore facilities.
The code is a requirement
from the International
Maritime Organization
(IMO) and the International
Convention for the Safety of
Life at Sea (SOLAS), and its
application is mandatory in
all the Member States.
In this report we update
the Certicate obtained by
PEMEX Rening for the
major shipping eet,
the minor shipping eet
and the offshore terminals
where they operate.
CLEAN
INDUSTRY
ISO-9001 ISO-14001 ISO-18001 ISM
TOTALS 369 46 29 1 1*
PEMEX Exploration and Production 233 10 1 - -
PEMEX Gas and Basic Petrochemicals 37 17 16 1 -
PEMEX Refining 91 18 11 - 1
PEMEX Petrochemicals 8 1 1 - -
OHSAS CERTI FI CATI ONS
In September 2005, the Sub-Direction of Production of
PEMEX Gas and Basic Petrochemical obtained a certica-
tion of the norm OHSAS 18001:1999 regarding safety and
occupational health management, which is a complement
to the certications it had obtained regarding quality (ISO-
9001) and environment (ISO-14001).
The objective of this norm is to establish the requirements
that must be fullled by a safety and health work manage-
ment system. Thereby it contributes to improve the well-
being conditions of the workers that can be affected by the
operative environment of a company.
The scope of the certi-
cate includes the following
work centers:
Main ofces
CPG Poza Rica
CPG Cactus
CPG Nvo. PEMEX
CPG Cd. PEMEX
CPG La Venta
CPG Matapionche
CPG Reynosa-Burgos
CPG Arenque
CPG rea Coatzacoalcos
Successful case
*The scope of the certification ISM for PEMEX Refining includes 17 tankers and 11 vessels of the minor
shipping fleet, 4 offshore terminals and 1 managers office.
Social development
PEMEXs social development actions are aimed to contribute
to create or fortify a mutual collaboration climate between
Petrleos Mexicanos and its social surrounds, for it would
have a positive repercussion in the achievement of the com-
panys substantive programs, as well as in the improvement
of the wellbeing and life style levels of the inhabitants of the
oil industry inuence zone.

As part of the efforts to construct a real culture of managerial
social responsibility, in Petrleos Mexicanos the following
supporting and bounding actions are carried out:
The driving principle is that the substantive
activities of the company must be safe
and respectful of the environment and the
surrounding communities
s
o
c
i
a
l

r
e
s
p
o
n
s
i
b
i
l
i
t
y
social responsibility
Denition and negotiation of Coordination Agreements, Settlements and Execution
Annexes, to establish the terms of understanding and collaboration with the social actors
of the surrounds in the oil industry inuence areas.
Agreements to support social development programs, projects and actions, before
government authorities, civil organizations, institutions and communitarian groups.
Authorization and delivery of economic and material resources to third parties, as a
support to social development works, programs and actions.
Attention to conicts and social problems derived from industrial accidents, emergencies
or natural disasters.
COORDI NATI ON AGREEMENTS
In 2005, certain terms of understanding and collabora-
tion were renovated between Petrleos Mexicanos and
the State government with greater activity of oil industry:
Campeche, Chiapas, Tabasco, Veracruz and Tamaulipas. In the
other cases the follow up of the agreements was carried out.
Through the subscription of these coordination agreements,
the general engagements and strategies were established in
order to integrate, in a balanced way, the oil industry activities
to the local development of the States, in a legal framework
and mutual respect. But, above all, the bases for PEMEX
participation in local development processes were settled.
PEMEX will participate through actions regarding environ-
mental protection, industrial safety, social development, civil
protection and investment and employment promotion.
SUPPORT AGREEMENTS
In 2005, numerous meetings were held with government
authorities, communitarian leaders, civil organizations and
different social institutions.
PEMEX used many of those meetings as a forum to present to
the community and the government authorities its industrial
development programs and projects, including the prelimi-
nary evaluation of their impact and the complementary mea-
sures to grant their adequate insertion in the local develop-
ment plans, in a sustainable way.

Likewise, an exhaustive process of settlements for institutional
support means took place, based on the analysis and evalua-
tion of the requests presented to PEMEX by third parties.
CASH AND NON- CASH
DONATI ONS
The contribution of cash
and non-cash donations
to third parties is part of
the institutional answer
to the support requests
and petitions presented to
Petrleos Mexicanos.
Coming mostly from states
and municipalities govern-
ments, civil organizations,
institutions and communi-
tarian groups, the requests
received in 2005 were basi-
cally demands for economi-
cal resources, products as
asphalt and fuels, pipes and
diverse goods.
Those resources were
mainly requirements to sup-
port the execution of differ-
ent infrastructure road and
hydraulic works; productive
projects, actions for the
urban strengthening and
public services; educational,
cultural, health and housing
projects; actions of environ-
mental protection; works
to rescue and preserve the
archeological patrimony;
and emergencies attention.
Work meetings as well as other bounding mechanisms
and forms, helped to know the main worries and needs
of the communities, who expressed their feelings about
the activities that Petrleos Mexicanos carries out
s
o
c
i
a
l

r
e
s
p
o
n
s
i
b
i
l
i
t
y
ENTITY
Donations
N O N - C A S H D O N AT I O N S
TOTAL PESOS Asphalt Fuels Pipes Diverse Properties
Pesos
Real Estate
Units
Subtotal
Pesos Tons Pesos Liters Pesos Meters Pesos Pesos
CAMPECHE* 30,000,000 12,000 30,481,655 21,005,000 112,802,917 180,060 - 143,464,632 173,464,632
CHIAPAS 10,000,000 9,500 24,284,628 15,367,808 86,771,916 83,080 11,111,106 69,554 1 122,237,204 132,237,204
TABASCO 190,500,000 26,500 67,313,654 4,820,000 24,371,087 250,934 1 91,935,675 282,435,675
TAMAULIPAS 6,323,626 20,710 52,621,718 5,361,000 28,625,416 149,056 - 81,396,190 87,719,816
VERACRUZ 15,818,899 63,760 161,999,054 7,112,900 37,736,663 37,785 4,916,306 838,374 4 205,490,397 221,309,296
Subtotal 252,642,525 132,470 336,700,709 53,666,708 290,307,999 120,865 16,027,412 1,487,978 6 644,524,098 897,166,623
COAHUILA - 7,260 18,441,403 470,000 2,472,565 220,200 - 21,134,168 21,134,168
GUANAJUATO - 2,720 7,053,237 910,100 5,011,728 136,000 - 12,200,965 12,200,965
HIDALGO 750,000 8,000 20,397,762 1,576,000 8,708,841 - - 29,106,603 29,856,603
NUEVO LEN 5,000,000 9,720 24,720,805 1,310,000 7,093,502 - 1 31,814,307 36,814,307
OAXACA - 10,660 27,077,870 1,195,000 6,349,030 37,785 4,916,306 - - 38,343,206 38,343,206
Subtotal 5,750,000 38,360 97,691,077 5,461,100 29,635,666 37,785 4,916,306 356,200 1 132,599,249 138,349,249
AGUASCALIENTES - 600 1,524,083 - - - - 1,524,083 1,524,083
BAJA CALIFORNIA - 3,200 8,128,442 300,000 1,528,284 - - 9,656,726 9,656,726
BAJA CALIFORNIA
SUR
2,000 5,080,276 250,000 1,289,475 - - 6,369,751 6,369,751
CHIHUAHUA - 1,160 2,946,561 95,000 550,220 - - 3,496,781 3,496,781
COLIMA - 3,000 7,620,414 350,000 1,828,596 - - 9,449,010 9,449,010
DISTRITO
FEDERAL
1,589,910 - - 160,000 934,503 96,969 2 1,031,472 2,621,382
DURANGO - 3,710 9,433,114 385,000 2,015,215 - - 11,448,329 11,448,329
GUERRERO - - - - - - - - -
JALISCO - 320 812,844 25,000 124,432 - - 937,276 937,276
MXICO - - - 20,000 117,608 - 2 117,608 117,608
MICHOACN - 1,380 3,505,393 135,000 731,575 80,200 - 4,317,168 4,317,168
MORELOS - - - - - - - - -
NAYARIT - - - - - - - - -
PUEBLA - 600 1,570,077 180,000 992,244 80,200 - 2,642,521 2,642,521
QUERTARO - 600 1,524,083 50,000 238,808 - - 1,762,891 1,762,891
QUINTANA ROO - 2,000 5,080,276 1,250,000 6,487,089 - - 11,567,365 11,567,365
SAN LUIS POTOS 2,000,000 2,920 7,417,203 280,000 1,503,611 41,087 - 8,961,901 10,961,901
SINALOA - - - - - - - - -
SONORA - 1,200 3,048,166 60,000 306,626 - - 3,354,792 3,354,792
TLAXCALA - 160 406,422 - - - - 406,422 406,422
YUCATN - 160 406,422 - - - - 406,422 406,422
ZACATECAS - 1,720 4,369,039 60,000 324,601 - - 4,693,640 4,693,640
Subtotal 3,589,910 24,730 62,872,815 3,600,000 18,972,887 - - 298,456 4 82,144,158 85,734,068
T O T A L 261,982,435 195,560 497,264,601 62,727,808 338,916,552 158,650 20,943,718 2,142,634 11 859,267,505 1,121,249,940
SPECIAL PROJECTS
DISTRITO FEDERAL
(DEPARTMENT OF
MARINE)
10,530,397 52,712,855 52,712,855 52,712,855
GOVERNMENT
OF GUATEMALA
REPUBLIC
317,974 1,775,911 1,775,911 1,775,911
GRAND TOTAL 261,982,435 195,560 497,264,601 73,576,179 393,405,318 158,650 20,943,718 2,142,634 11 913,756,271 1,175,738,706
Administration Corporate Direction
Social Development Corporate Management Ofce
2005 CASH AND NON- CASH DONATI ONS AUTHORI ZED BY PETRLEOS MEXI CANOS BOARD OF DI RECTORS
*/ The agreement Acuerdo CA-314/2005 is modified with Acuerdo CA-499/2005. The original volume of marine diesel is changed and diesel is added in the following volumes:
marine diesel 2,397,106 liters and diesel 2,602,894 liters, which has an impact on the original value of the agreement.

It is worth mentioning that
the process of responding
to the petitions takes as a
reference the corresponding
regulation in force, speci-
cally the guidelines to Grant
Cash and Non-cash Dona-
tions, as well as the Criteria
for Assignment of Cash and
Non-cash Donations, both
authorized by the Board
of Directors of Petrleos
Mexicanos.
The oil industry head gov-
ernment ofce authorized
in 2005 a global amount of
cash and non-cash dona-
tions for 1,175 million 738
thousand 706 MXP, amount
which can be compared,
in a world-wide basis, to
the resources that other
companies assign to similar
means.
In 2005, the total amount of
cash and non-cash dona-
tions authorized by PEMEX
represented the 4.4% of
the Fondo de Aportacio-
nes para la Infraestructura
Social (FAIS Contributions
Fund for Social Infrastruc-
ture) total, which is a part
of the federal resources
appointed to social matters
investments.
For example, from the total of resources donated by PEMEX during 2001, the 12.5% was
directed to municipalities governments, in 2005 this same share grew to 23.1%.
Giving these resources, PEMEX contributed in an important, and some times decisive way
to settle the needs of small nucleus of people, settled in marginal localities in oil industry
inuence zones, improving their wellbeing levels.
In the last few years, PEMEX
institutional policy has been gradually
oriented to develop resources
directly to the municipalities, which
face the problems and needs of
the communities located in the oil
industry inuence zone.
s
o
c
i
a
l

r
e
s
p
o
n
s
i
b
i
l
i
t
y
Moreover, this support contributed also to improve the bonds
and the relations between PEMEX and the authorities as
well as social interest groups, allowing a good interaction
between industry and its surroundings.
Another positive factor, associated to the deliver of cash and
non-cash donations, was the transparency of the process.
In accordance with institutional programs and intending to
avoid any doubts about possible factors of discretionality in
the resources assignment, during 2005, the total amount of
the cash and non-cash donations, authorized by PEMEXs
Board of Directors, was published in the web page of the
company http://www.pemex.com (in fast browsing, go to
en la comunidad, then to desarrollo social and then to
zonas de inuencia), presenting their distribution by entity
and type of donation.
RELEVANT SOCI OECONOMI C AND
ENVI RONMENTAL ACTI ONS
Among the programs, projects, works and actions carried
out during 2005 with Petrleos Mexicanos contributions,
the following cases are most representative:
PEMEX-Universidad Veracruzana y
Nios & Cras, A.C. Agreement
Donation to implement research,
conservation and sustainable
development actions in the Sistema
Arrecifal Veracruzano (Veracruz
State reef system)
Donation for the program of
management of the Centros de
Proteccin y Conservacin de las
Tortugas Marinas (Sea turtles
protection and preservation centers)
in Veracruz State.
Castro y Giro Bridge, over
Tepetitn River, Macuspana
Municipality, Tabasco State.
Multi-annual construction of mutual
benefit PEMEX-Community.
Support to the fishery and
aquaculture production in Tabasco
State. Oyster production projects;
donation of boats, equipments and
fishing gear; support to pejelagarto
(alligator-head fish - Atractosteus
tropicus) and snook culture;
maintenance and repairs of
equipment and fishing gear.
Asphalt donation for the
construction of urban road
infrastructure in oil industry
municipalities in Tabasco State.
Donation of fuels for the machinery
and equipment operation in
Tamaulipas State Municipalities.
Donation of asphalt to pave the
roads of El Mante Municipality, in
Tamaulipas State.
Successful cases
Natural protected areas
The protected natural areas are the main activity for the con-
servation of biodiversity, properties and ecological services.
The physical coincidences of PEMEX projects in these
zones compel us to look for industrial development in order
to reconcile the ecosystems integrity with the participation
of local communities.
Protected Natural Areas are land or water portions of the
national territory, which represent the different ecosystems
and biodiversity, where the environment has not been altered
in essence by human, and are subject to special protection,
conservation, restoration and development regulations.
There are, for most of them, management programs which
dene a zonication and the activities that can be developed
in each zone.
Between the years 2001 and 2004, 57.31 million MXP
were sourced for protected natural areas, allowing the co-
existence of oil activities and populated areas within the
protected environment. Those resources were applied in
multi-annual projects.
One of the most important projects is the Biosphere Reserve
Pantanos de Centla, in Tabasco State. This reserve is eco-
logically rich as well as valuable for its energetic resources. In
this zone, PEMEX produces annually 27.18 MDCF of sweet
gas and has more than 400 facilities. A donation of 20 mil-
lion pesos was given to Espacios Naturales and Desarrollo
Sustentable, A.C. for the Biosphere Reserve Pantanos de
Centla, Tabasco, as well as for conservation, communitarian
development and environmental education projects. These
gures give an approximate idea of the relevance of this
area for the country and why its use and its conservation
must be conciliated.
2006 CONSERVATI ON
ACTI VI TI ES
MAR NEGRO LAGOON
RESTORATI ON,
TAMAULI PAS STATE
During 2005, the studies for
the construction of a dam
were carried out. This dam
should help to recover the ideal
characteristics of the Mar
Negro lagoon channels, in
Tamaulipas State.

During the rst six months of
2006, the dam construction
will continue with an embank-
ment that will serve as an
access to equipment and will
be integrated to the design for
the hydrological improvement
of the system. These works
will enlarge the wetland
contributing to help the envi-
ronmental conditions for the
migratory birds.
s
o
c
i
a
l

r
e
s
p
o
n
s
i
b
i
l
i
t
y
RESOURCES GI VEN BETWEEN 2001 AND 2004, APPLI ED I N MULTI - ANNUAL PROJECTS
AREA APPLI CATI ON AMOUNT
(thousands of pesos)
PANTANOS DE CENTLA, TAB. (2001) (SWAMPS)
Conservation, communitarian development and environmental education. 10,000.00
PANTANOS DE CENTLA, TAB. (2003) (SWAMPS)
Natural resources protection.
Restoration of altered areas.
Research projects.
Environmental education and productive projects.
10,000.00
LAGUNA DE TRMINOS, CAMP. (LAGOON) Rehabilitation of outfalls and canals.
Reforestation.
Fight fire.
Environmental education.
Monitoring of L.T. environmental conditions.
Wastes handling.
Communitarian projects.
10,000.00
SISTEMA ARRECIFAL VERACRUZANO, VER.
(REEF SYSTEM)
Environmental education program.
SAVs physical-chemical, biological and socioeconomic diagnosis.
Octopus fattening productive project.
4,500.00
ARRECIFES DE TUXPAN, VER. (REEFS)
EL TAJN AND EL REMOLINO, VER. (SITES)
CAADAS DE PATLA, PUE. (GULLIES)
CAMPAMENTOS TORTUGUEROS, VER.
(TURTLE CAMPS)
Environmental education.
Signs and signals.
Ecotourism.
Reforestation and handling areas of El Tajn and El Remolino.
Technical Study justifying the settlement of a natural protected area in the
Totonac zone of Puebla and Veracruz States which comprises the Northern
Sierra of Puebla, the Evergreen high forest and the Mesofilo mountain forest;
protection for aquifer recharge.
Tecolutla, Alto Lucero and Vega de Alatorre, Ver. turtle camps.
5,000.00
CUENCA DE BURGOS (BASIN) Eroded soils recuperation, Ro Bravos Delta wetlands restoration and
reforestation.
10,000.00

PARQUE JAGUARUNDI (PARK) Conservation, damping area, environmental education and carbon capture. 8,312.50
TOTAL $57, 812. 50
JAGUARUNDI ECOLOGI CAL PARK
Located in the Coatzacoalcos zone, in the State of Veracruz, between Can-
grejera and Pajaritos petrochemical complexes, the Jaguarundi Ecological
Park has an area of approximately 1,000 ha (2,471 acres); it has well preserved
patches of evergreen medium and high forest, pastures, secondary forests
(acahuales), water bodies and degraded zones.
The objective of this natural protected area is to provide real and integral
information about the capture of forest carbon during all the cycle, to pre-
serve and develop a remain of evergreen medium forest, an area for envi-
ronmental education and an ecological promenade, and, besides, to have a
safeguard zone for the Cangrejera petrochemical complex. Between 2003
and 2005, the studies, of biological evaluations and a handling plan of carbon
capture were carried out. In 2006, the engineering for the leisure and envi-
ronmental education area of the reservation will be developed.

s
o
c
i
a
l

r
e
s
p
o
n
s
i
b
i
l
i
t
y
PEMEX EXPLORATI ON AND PRODUCTI ON: NORTHERN REGI ON
RESTORATI ON OF JASSO, SALTI LLO AND MAR NEGRO LAGOON SYSTEM
Objective:
Restoration of Jasso, Saltillo
and Mar Negro lagoons
ora and fauna habitat, in
Tamaulipas State.
Description:
Recuperation of the pond and
the water depth, and also im-
provement of our knowledge
about the laminar air ow in
order to be able to have a posi-
tive inuence on the recovery
of its environmental services.
Successful case
Investment:
5.1 MMXP
Results:
Recuperation of 5000 ha of
coast wetlands.
Successful case
PEMEX PETROCHEMI CALS
JAGUARUNDI ECOLOGI CAL PARK
Objective:
Conservation; carbon capture;
environmental education; con-
servation and leisure zone.
Description:
Evaluation of carbon capture
in semi-evergreen forest,
pasture and secondary forest
(acahual); restoration; habitat
conservation; leisure zone,
and environmental education.
Results:
A potential capture of 66,446
tons of carbon for the whole
park, which is approximately
66.44 tons by hectare. From
this, 36,263 tons correspond
to the transition of pastures to
mature secondary forests
(mature acahuales); 27,919,
to that of young acahuales,
mature acahuales, and 2,264,
to the remaining vegetation of
the park.
Investment:
8.3 MMXP
Land ecological ordinance
In accordance with the General Law of Ecological Balance
and Environmental Protection, the Land Ecological Ordinance
is a planning process, whose purpose is to evaluate and pro-
gram land use and the management of natural resources
within the national territory in order to preserve and restore
the ecological balance and protect the environment.

The authorities and the social groups must commit them-
selves to the development of activities and the efcient use
of their region resources.
In order to achieve a balance between productive activities
and nature protection, the environmental authorities have
designed the Land Ecological Ordinances, which are plan-
ning tools allowing to correct tendencies and good develop-
ment of human activities.
It is essential to have an ofcial document which compli-
ance shall be obligatory for all users, and which shall dene
the uses of land, simplify and insure the good fulllment
of our activities. The information generated regarding the
biophysical, economic and social environment of the area
being studied, provides valuable parameters to employ the
necessary resources and support in the communities and
environment, with scientic bases and veracious informa-
tion, optimizing the use of PEMEXs resources.
Due to the geographic loca-
tion of the existing facilities,
as well as its present and
future projects, convinced
that a decree of LAND
ECOLOGICAL ORDINANCE
is a valuable planning tool,
PEMEX participates actively
in the Land Ecological Ordi-
nances (LEO) of the Cuenca
baja del ro Coatzacoalcos
and of the Cuenca del ro
Tuxpan in Veracruz State;
in the north of the country,
in the LEO of the Cuenca
de Burgos in Tamaulipas,
Nuevo Len and Coahuila
States; and in the territorial
Land Ecological Ordinance
of the oil zone of Regin
V, in the northern zone of
Chiapas State, with the
project, which contract is
still under legal review by
the parties, on the LEO of the
Gulf of Mexico, as PEMEX
future is on the sea.
During 2005, the Land
Ecological Ordinance of the
Cuenca de Burgos region
and the data actualization of
the Cuenca baja del ro Coat-
zacoalcos were elaborated.
The decree is expected to
be published in 2006, in the
Diario Ocial de la Fede-
racin. Also, for 2006, it is
expected to have the Land
Ecological ordinance of
the Cuenca de Burgos re-
gion, to continue with the
LEO of the Cuenca baja
del ro Coatzacoalcos, as
well as to elaborate the
diagnosis of the LEO of the
Cuenca del ro Tuxpan.
The creation of Land Ecological Ordinances
within the national territory gives
legal certainty to PEMEXs future growth
activities in the country
Successful case
ECOLOGI CAL ORDI NANCE OF THE CUENCA DE BURGOS REGI ON
As an effort of the Coahuila, Nuevo Len and Tamaulipas States Govern-
ments, under the coordination of SEMARNAT, and with the participation of
PEMEX, the Land Ecological Ordinance of the Cuenca de Burgos region,
which has a surface of de 208, 805 km2 (80,620 mile
2
), is being achieved.
how do the environmental
conicts, identied in the di-
agnosis are evolved in time;
which conicts can occur
if there was a regional de-
velopment project (PEMEX,
CFE, SCT) of other industrial,
agricultural or farming activi-
ties, or urban growth;
how could these conicts be
prevented through the eco-
logical strategies based on
the model of LAND ECOLOGI-
CAL ORDINANCE, and
the diagnosis studies of
the region, that would be
concluded, as well as the
ordinance prediction, assent
and decree phase.
The region has a rich and varied
wild life, besides valuable shing
resources due to its adjacency to
the Gulf of Mexico. It is a natural
resources reservation, such as the
non-associated gas. At this respect,
in this zone, is located one of the
four of the most important gas
basins of this kind in the country
The Land Ecological Ordi-
nance, which started with the
signature of a Collaboration
Agreement between the Coa-
huila, Nuevo Len and Tam-
aulipas States and the Federal
Government, will analyze:
s
o
c
i
a
l

r
e
s
p
o
n
s
i
b
i
l
i
t
y
,
PEMEX EXPLORATI ON AND PRODUCTI ON: NORTHERN REGI ON TERRI TORI AL ECOLOGI CAL
ORDI NANCE OF THE REGIN DE LA CUENCA DE BURGOS ( BURGOS BASI N REGI ON)
Successful case
Objective:
To have a sustainable planning
tool for the human activities
in the Regin de la Cuenca de
Burgos (Burgos Basin region).
Description:
To have a socioeconomic and
environmental diagnosis har-
monizing the urban, industrial,
agricultural and farming
development with the conser-
vation of the natural resources
and environmental services of
the region.
Results:
Diagnosis and Regional
Land Ecological Ordinance
Program.
Investment: 3.5 MMXP
RED-TAILED HAWK, Buteo jamaicensis
SNOWBALL CACTUS, Mammilloydia candida
RACCOON, Procyon lotor
CUENCA DE BURGOS (BURGOS BASIN)
Concordance with GRI framework
2002 GRI indicators GC Chapter Section Page
VISION AND STRATEGY
1.1. Statement of the vision and strategy regarding SD 8 Message from the Director General - 2-3
1.2. Statement from the CEO describing key elements of the report Message from the Director General - 2-3
PROFI LE
2.1. Name of the organization Petrleos Mexicanos in context - 8
2.2. Major products and services Petrleos Mexicanos in context Infrastructure and main
operational results
10
2.3. Operational structure Petrleos Mexicanos in context Infrastructure and main
operational results
10
2.4. Description of divisions, companies, subsidiaries... -
2.5. Countries in which the organizations operations are located Petrleos Mexicanos in context - 9
2.6. Nature of ownership; legal form Petrleos Mexicanos in context - 8
2.7. Nature of markets served -
2.8. Scale of the reporting organization Petrleos Mexicanos in context - 9
2.9. List of stakeholders, key attributes of each, and relationship to the reporting organization -
REPORT SCOPE
2.10. Contact person for the report Relevant Notes. Principles Your Opinion is important iii
2.11. Reporting period Relevant Notes. Principles Reports Content ii
2.12. Date of most recent previous report -
2.13. Boundaries of report (geographic, divisions...) -
2.14. Significant changes -
2.15. Basis for reporting on joint ventures, subsidiaries... -
2.16. Nature and effect of any re-statements of information provided in earlier reports -
2.17. Decisions not to apply GRI Relevant Notes. Principles Improvement Commitments iii
2.18. Criteria used in accounting (E/E/S costs and benefits) -
2.19. Changes from previous years in the measurement methods applied to E/E/S information -
2.20. Policies and practices to enhance and provide assurance about the accuracy, completeness, and reliability Relevant Notes. Principles Range limits of the information ii
2.21. Policy and current practice with regard to providing independent assurance for the full report Message from the Director General - 3
Relevant Notes. Principles Independent Verication Process ii
2.22. Means by which report users can obtain additional information Relevant Notes. Principles Informations Integration ii
GOVERNANCE STRUCTURE AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS
3.1. Governance structure. Committees that are responsible for setting strategy Petrleos Mexicanos in context Corporate Governance 13
3.2. Percentage of the board of directors that are independent, non-executive directors Petrleos Mexicanos in context Corporate Governance 13
3.3. Process for determining the expertise board members need to guide the strategic direction of the organization -
3.4. Board-level processes for overseeing the identication and management of E/E/S risks and opportunities Petrleos Mexicanos in context Risk Management 13
3.5. Linkage between executive compensation and achievement of financial and non-financial goals -
3.6. Organizational structure for oversight, implementation, and audit of E/E/S policies -
3.7. Mission and values statements, internal codes or principles, and polices relevant to E/E/S Petrleos Mexicanos in context - 9
3.8. Mechanisms for shareholders to provide recommendations -
STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT
3.9. Basis for identification and selection of major stakeholders -
3.10. Approaches to stakeholder consultation (frequency, type and group) Social Responsibility Social Development 54
3.11. Type of information generated by stakeholder consultations Social Responsibility Social Development 54
3.12. Use of information resulting from stakeholder engagements Social Responsibility Social Development 54
OVERARCHI NG POLI CI ES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS
3.13. Whether and how the precautionary approach or principle is addressed by the organization 7 -
3.14. Voluntary E/E/S charters, sets of principles, or other initiatives to which the organization subscribes or which it endorses Relevant Notes. Principles Transparency Commitment 4-6
3.15. Memberships in associations and/or organizations -
3.16. Policies and/or systems for managing upstream and downstream impacts -
3.17. Approach to managing indirect E/E/S impacts -
3.18. Decisions regarding the location of, or changes in, operations -
3.19. Programs and procedures pertaining to E/E/S performance There are some procedures and
programs that are mentioned in
diffrent chapters of the report
3.20. Status of certification pertaining to E/E/S management systems Environmental Performance Certifications 52-53
ECONOMI C PERFORMANCE I NDI CATORS
EC1. Net sales Petrleos Mexicanos in context Main economic results 11
EC2. Geographic breakdown of markets -
EC3. Cost of all goods, materials, and services purchased -
EC4. Percentage of contracts that were paid in accordance with agreed terms -
EC5. Total payroll broken down by country or region -
EC6. Distributions to providers of capital -
EC7. Increase/decrease in retained earnings at end of period Petrleos Mexicanos in context Main economic results 11
EC8. Total sum of taxes of all types paid broken down by country Petrleos Mexicanos in context Main economic results 11
EC9. Subsidies received, broken down by country or region -
EC10. Donations to community, civil society, etc., per type of group Social Responsibility Social Development 54-59
EC11*. Supplier breakdown by organization and country -
EC12*. Total spent on non-core business infrastructure development -
EC13*. The organizations indirect economic impacts -
ENVI RONMENTAL PERFORMANCE I NDI CATORS
EN1. Total materials use, other than water, by type 8 -
EN2. Percentage of materials used that are wastes from external sources 8 -
EN3. Direct energy use segmented by primary source 8 Statistical Appendix - 66
EN4. Indirect energy use 8 Statistical Appendix - 66
EN5. Total water use 8 Statistical Appendix - 66
EN6. Location and size of land owned, leased, or managed in biodiversity-rich habitats 8 -
EN7. Description of the major impacts on biodiversity 8 -
EN8. Greenhouse gas emissions 8 Environmental Performance Climate Change 32-33
EN9. Use and emissions of ozone-depleting substances 8 -
EN10. NOx, SOx, and other significant emissions to air 8 Environmental Performance Emissions to Air 26-29
EN11. Total amount of waste by type and destination 8 Environmental Performance Hazardous Waste 48-51
EN12. Significant discharges to water by type 8 Environmental Performance Water Utilization and Discharges 40-41
EN13. Significant spills of chemicals, oils, and fuels 8 Industrial Safety Spills and Leaks in Pipelines 22-25
EN14. Significant environmental impacts of principal products and services 8 -
EN15. % of the weight of products that may be recovered at the end of the products lifecycle and percentage
that is actually recovered
8 -
EN16. Incidents of and nes for non-compliance (international declarations/conventions/treaties, and legal regulations) 8 -
EN17*. Initiatives to use renewable energy sources and to increase energy efficiency 9 Relevant Notes about this report Transparency Commitment 4-5
EN18*. Energy consumption footprint of major products, expressed in Joules 8 -
EN19*. Other indirect energy use and implications 8 -
EN20*. Water sources and related ecosystems/habitats significantly affected by use of water 8 -
EN21*. Annual withdrawals of ground and surface water as a percent of annual renewable quantity of water
available from the sources
8 -
EN22*. Total recycling and reuse of water 8 -
EN23*. Total amount of land owned, leased, or managed for production activities
or extractive use
8 -
EN24*. Amount of impermeable surface as a percentage of land purchased or leased 8 -
EN25*. Impacts of activities and operations on protected and sensitive areas 8 -
EN26*. Changes to natural habitats resulting from activities and operations and percentage of habitat
protected or restored
8 -
EN27*. Objectives, programs, and targets for protecting and restoring native ecosystems and species in
degraded areas
8 Social Responsibility Participation in Natural Areas - Land
Ecological Ordinance
60-65
EN28*. Number of IUCN Red List species with habitats in areas affected
by operations
8 -
EN29*. Business units currently operating or planning operations in or around protected or sensitive areas 8 Social Responsibility Participation in Natural Areas - Land
Ecological Ordinance
60-65
EN30*. Other relevant indirect greenhouse gas emissions 8 -
EN31*. All production, transport, import, or export of any waste deemed hazardous under the terms of the
Basel Convention Annex I, II, III, and VIII
8 Environmental Performance Hazardous Waste 48-51
EN32*. Water sources and related ecosystems/habitats significantly affected by discharges of water and runoff 8 -
EN33*. Performance of suppliers relative to environmental components of programs and procedures described
in response to Governance Structure and Management Systems section
8 -
EN34*. Significant environmental impacts of transportation used for logistical purposes 8 -
EN35*. Total environmental expenditures by type 7 -
SOCI AL PERFORMANCE I NDI CATORS
Employment
LA1. Breakdown of workforce and workforce retained in conjunction with other employers (status, employment and contract type) -
LA2. Net employment creation -
LA12*. Employee benefits beyond those legally mandated -
Labor/Management Relations
LA3. % of employees represented by independent trade union organizations or other bona de employee representatives 3 -
LA4. Policy and procedures involving information, consultation, and negotiation with employees over changes in the operations 3 -
LA13*. Provision for formal worker representation in decisionmaking or management,
including corporate governance
3 -
Health and Safety
LA5. Practices on recording and notification of occupational accidents and diseases (ILO recomendations) Industrial Safety Personal accidents 14-19
LA6. Joint health and safety committees (both-parties representatives) and % of workforce covered by any such committees -
LA7. Standard injury, lost day, and absentee rates and number of work-related fatalities Message from the Director General - 2-3
Industrial Safety Personal accidents 14-19
LA8. Description of policies or programs on HIV/AIDS -
LA14*. Evidence of substantial compliance with the ILO Guidelines for
Occupational Health
-
LA15*. Description of formal agreements with trade unions or other bona fide employee representatives covering
health and safety at work
Industrial Safety Personal accidents 14-19
Training and Education
LA9. Average hours of training (year/employee) by categories -
LA16*. Description of programs to support the continued employability -
Diversity and Opportunity
LA10. Description of equal opportunity policies or programs, as well as monitoring systems 6 -
LA11. Composition of senior management and corporate governance bodies 6 -
Human Rights
HR1. HR policies, guidelines, and structures. Monitoring mechanisms 1 -
HR2. Evidence of HR impacts as part of investment and procurement decisions (selection of suppliers/contractors) 1-2 -
HR3. Policies and procedures to evaluate HR performance within the supply chain and contractors. Monitoring systems 1-2 -
HR8*. Employee training on policies and practices concerning human rights 1-2 -
Non-discrimination
HR4. Policies and programs preventing all forms of discrimination. Monitoring systems 1-6 -
Freedom of Association and Collective Bargaining
HR5. Freedom of association policy and extent to which this policy is applied 3 -
Child Labor
HR6. Policy excluding child labor 5 -
Forced and Compulsory Labor
HR7. Policy to prevent forced labor 4 -
Disciplinary Practices
HR9*. Description of appeal practices -
HR10*. Description of non-retaliation policy and effective, confidential employee grievance system -
Safety Practices
HR11*. Human rights training for safety personnel 1-2 -
Indigenous Rights
HR12*. Description of policies, guidelines, and procedures to address the needs of indigenous people -
HR13*. Description of jointly managed community grievance mechanisms/authority -
HR14*. Share of operating revenues from the area of operations that are redistributed to local communities -
Community
SO1. Policies to manage impacts on communities. Procedures/ programs to address this issue, including monitoring systems Social Responsibility Social Development 54-59
SO4*. Awards received relevant to social, ethical, and environmental performance -
Bribery and Corruption
SO2. Policy, procedures/management systems, and compliance mechanisms addressing bribery and corruption 10 -
Political Contributions
SO3. Policy, procedures/management systems, and compliance mechanisms for managing political lobbying and contributions -
SO5*. Amount of money paid to political parties whose prime function is to fund political parties or their candidates -
Competition and Pricing
SO6*. Court decisions regarding cases pertaining to anti-trust and monopoly regulations -
SO7*. Description of policy and management systems for preventing anti-competitive behavior -
Customer Health and Safety
PR1. Policy and procedures/programs for preserving customer health and safety, including monitoring systems -
PR4*. Number and type of instances of non-compliance with regulations concerning customer health and safety.
Penalties and fines assessed for these breaches
-
PR5*. Number of complaints upheld by regulatory or similar official bodies to oversee or regulate the health
and safety of products and services
-
PR6*. Voluntary code compliance, product labels or awards with respect to social and/or
environmental responsibility
-
Products and Services
PR2. Policy, procedures/management systems, and compliance mechanisms related to product information and labeling -
PR7*. Number and type of instances of non-compliance with regulations concerning product information and labeling -
PR8*. Policy, procedures/management systems, and compliance mechanisms related to customer satisfaction -
Advertising
PR9*. Policies, procedures/management systems, and compliance mechanisms related to advertising -
PR10*. Number and types of breaches of advertising and marketing regulations -
Respect for Privacy
PR3. Policy, procedures/management systems, and compliance mechanisms for consumer privacy -
PR11* Number of substantiated complaints regarding breaches of consumer privacy -
* Additional indicators
EMI SSI ONS TO AI R DI SCHARGES TO WATER
HAZARDOUS
WASTE
GENERATI ON
HYDROCARBONS SPI LLS AND LEAKS ( *) PRODUCTI ON
GREENHOUSE
GASES
( GHG)
ENERGY CONSUMPTI ON
WATER
HANDLI NG
BASIC CONTAMINANT MATTER
SOx NOx PARTI CLES VOCs TOC
TOTAL
EMI SSI ONS
O & G TSS Tot N PHOSPHATES TOTAL BOD
WASTE
GENERATION
REPORTED
NUMBER OF
SPILLS
ESTIMATED
SPILLED
QUANTITY
REPORTED
NUMBER OF
LEAKS
ESTIMATED
LEAKED
QUANTITY
PEP, PGPB, PPQ
PRODUCTION AND
CRUDE OIL PROCESS
CO
2
EMISSIONS
(MTON)
TOTAL ENERGY CONSUMPTION
(MBCOE)
(INCLUDES FLARING AND
VENTING) (MBCOE)
PER UNIT OF THROUGHPUT
(MBCOE/TTON)
VENTING) (MBCOE/TTON)
USE OF CRUDE
WATER (m
3
)
TOTAL PEMEX 516, 917 91, 088 19, 315 55, 077 32, 653 715, 049 389 1, 856 317 51 2, 614 1, 633 701, 678 283 3, 180 116 348 413, 722, 677 37. 444 105. 2 117. 1 0. 00025 0. 00028 191, 095, 711
PEP 71, 990 41, 602 1, 022 13, 466 13, 160 141, 239 81. 162 319. 677 0. 475 0. 121 401. 435 319. 951 614, 072 226 211 102 19 290, 992, 091 9. 925 29. 3 39. 3 0. 00010 0. 00013 9, 220, 207
RMNE 40,370.3 10,032.0 215.3 54.0 1,335.4 52,007.1 0.492 1.419 - - 1.911 2.842 1,937 1 - 1 - 203,213,907 4.1 11.3 17.0 0.00006 0.00008 26,834
RMSO 11,461.9 5,976.9 184.9 1,254.6 1,040.2 19,918.5 53.102 116.885 - - 169.988 88.839 55,016 2 - - - 27,702,999 2.0 5.6 8.3 0.00020 0.00030 3,305,969
RN 11,923.2 5,020.8 188.2 7,610.1 6,811.1 31,553.5 0.314 1.473 0.464 0.074 2.325 1.716 897 141 167 65 2 21,676,397 1.1 2.8 4.1 0.00013 0.00019 2,946,976
RS 5,453.3 9,072.4 160.2 4,547.0 3,580.7 22,813.6 0.823 2.682 0.011 0.047 3.563 3.014 702 80 43 36 18 38,398,788 2.2 8.1 8.4 0.00021 0.00022 2,917,250
UPMP 2,781.0 11,500.0 273.2 - 392.3 14,946.7 26.431 197.217 - - 223.649 223.540 555,521 2 1 - - - 0.6 1.5 1.5 - - 23,179
PR 395, 931 33, 382 16, 917 36, 599 4, 093 486, 922 147. 234 669. 293 232. 634 33. 992 1, 083. 153 585. 876 50, 205 55 2, 901 6 1 67, 243, 712 15. 642 41. 7 42. 8 0. 00062 0. 00064 86, 469, 698
REFINERIES 388,855.6 26,826.0 16,773.2 25,175.9 3,853.8 461,484.5 130.586 630.898 226.021 31.356 1,018.863 506.555 40,073 3 177 1 1 67,243,712 14.8 38.7 39.8 0.00058 0.00059 85,196,054
COMMERCIAL 3.9 10.6 0.8 1,011.0 16.1 1,042.4 0.351 0.995 0.300 1.065 2.710 1.350 545 - - - - - 0.0 0.2 0.2 - - 686,492
DISTRIBUTION 7,071.0 6,545.9 142.7 10,412.5 223.1 24,395.2 16.297 37.400 6.312 1.571 61.580 77.972 9,586 52 2,724 5 - - 0.9 2.8 2.8 - - 587,151
PGPB 39, 575 8, 986 666 2, 625 13, 691 65, 542 27. 537 126. 363 52. 011 3. 415 209. 327 238. 148 1, 848 1 68 7 248 49, 415, 171 5. 845 15. 8 15. 9 0. 00032 0. 00032 42, 127, 667
CPGs 39,562 8,608 658 2,622 13,296 64,746 27.323 125.656 51.98 3.409 208.368 237.302 1,624 - - - - 49,415,171 5.7 15.1 15.2 0.00031 0.00031 42,032,742
PIPELINES 13.1 373.4 7.7 2.4 357.0 753.6 0.108 0.378 0.002 0.000 0.489 0.105 135 1 68 7 248 - 0.1 0.6 0.6 - - 67,429
TERMINALS 0.3 4.1 0.4 0.1 37.8 42.7 0.106 0.329 0.029 0.005 0.470 0.741 88 - - - - - 0.0 0.1 0.1 - - 27,496
PPQ 9, 421 7, 118 710 2, 387 1, 710 21, 346 133. 447 740. 948 32. 247 13. 497 920. 139 488. 838 35, 553 1 0. 010 1 80 6, 071, 703 6. 032 18. 3 19. 1 0. 00302 0. 00314 53, 278, 139
CPQ Camargo - - - 1.7 0.1 1.7 - - 0.000 - 0.000 0.002 16 - - - - - - - - - - 110,610
CPQ Cangrejera 34.8 3,163.3 236.6 846.9 1,061.0 5,342.7 39.175 233.244 14.327 4.664 291.411 175.793 13,996 - - - - 2,958,090 2.8 10.6 10.6 0.00359 0.00359 23,012,921
CPQ Cosoleacaque 22.5 884.7 31.3 20.5 54.9 1,013.9 12.407 28.063 - - 40.469 43.367 96 - - - - 629,864 1.0 1.3 1.3 0.00202 0.00202 7,156,579
CPQ Escoln 0.1 282.9 6.2 19.7 99.6 408.5 0.116 0.247 0.119 0.020 0.502 0.258 443 - - - - 27,745 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.00610 0.00610 73,852
CPQ Independencia 3,150.3 442.8 214.3 185.1 282.4 4,274.8 2.170 11.961 2.413 0.474 17.017 20.804 42 - - - - 88,063 0.2 0.6 0.9 0.00714 0.00975 1,747,823
CPQ Morelos 6,212.7 1,659.0 169.0 1,202.2 158.4 9,401.4 71.934 444.996 12.498 7.971 537.399 192.952 1,573 - - - - 1,787,962 1.5 4.5 4.9 0.00249 0.00276 17,309,660
CPQ Pajaritos 0.7 653.1 37.8 90.7 25.4 807.7 7.561 19.418 - - 26.978 52.451 19,300 - - - - 528,564 0.3 1.0 1.0 0.00195 0.00195 3,016,280
CPQ Tula 0.1 32.0 15.0 20.0 28.1 95.1 0.085 3.020 2.890 0.367 6.362 3.212 84 - - - - 51,416 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.00333 0.00333 850,414
Pipelines - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 0.010 1 80 - - - - - - -
* These data were issue from other comptability systems of the company
Statistic appendix 2005, SISPA
JANUARY- DECEMBER 2005
DATA COMPTABI LI ZED I N SI SPA
ALL UNITS ARE IN TONS EXCEPT WHEN IT IS INDICATED IN THE TITLE
HAZARDOUS
WASTE
GENERATI ON
GREENHOUSE
GASES
( GHG)
ENERGY CONSUMPTI ON
WATER
HANDLI NG
TOTAL
EMI SSI ONS
WASTE
GENERATION
REPORTED
NUMBER OF
SPILLS
ESTIMATED
SPILLED
QUANTITY
REPORTED
NUMBER OF
LEAKS
ESTIMATED
LEAKED
QUANTITY
PEP, PGPB, PPQ
PRODUCTION AND
CRUDE OIL PROCESS
CO
2
EMISSIONS
(MTON)
(MBCOE)
VENTING) (MBCOE)
(MBCOE/TTON)
USE OF CRUDE
WATER (m
3
)
TOTAL PEMEX 516, 917 91, 088 19, 315 55, 077 32, 653 715, 049 389 1, 856 317 51 2, 614 1, 633 701, 678 283 3, 180 116 348 413, 722, 677 37. 444 105. 2 117. 1 0. 00025 0. 00028 191, 095, 711
PEP 71, 990 41, 602 1, 022 13, 466 13, 160 141, 239 81. 162 319. 677 0. 475 0. 121 401. 435 319. 951 614, 072 226 211 102 19 290, 992, 091 9. 925 29. 3 39. 3 0. 00010 0. 00013 9, 220, 207
RMNE 40,370.3 10,032.0 215.3 54.0 1,335.4 52,007.1 0.492 1.419 - - 1.911 2.842 1,937 1 - 1 - 203,213,907 4.1 11.3 17.0 0.00006 0.00008 26,834
RMSO 11,461.9 5,976.9 184.9 1,254.6 1,040.2 19,918.5 53.102 116.885 - - 169.988 88.839 55,016 2 - - - 27,702,999 2.0 5.6 8.3 0.00020 0.00030 3,305,969
RN 11,923.2 5,020.8 188.2 7,610.1 6,811.1 31,553.5 0.314 1.473 0.464 0.074 2.325 1.716 897 141 167 65 2 21,676,397 1.1 2.8 4.1 0.00013 0.00019 2,946,976
RS 5,453.3 9,072.4 160.2 4,547.0 3,580.7 22,813.6 0.823 2.682 0.011 0.047 3.563 3.014 702 80 43 36 18 38,398,788 2.2 8.1 8.4 0.00021 0.00022 2,917,250
UPMP 2,781.0 11,500.0 273.2 - 392.3 14,946.7 26.431 197.217 - - 223.649 223.540 555,521 2 1 - - - 0.6 1.5 1.5 - - 23,179
PR 395, 931 33, 382 16, 917 36, 599 4, 093 486, 922 147. 234 669. 293 232. 634 33. 992 1, 083. 153 585. 876 50, 205 55 2, 901 6 1 67, 243, 712 15. 642 41. 7 42. 8 0. 00062 0. 00064 86, 469, 698
REFINERIES 388,855.6 26,826.0 16,773.2 25,175.9 3,853.8 461,484.5 130.586 630.898 226.021 31.356 1,018.863 506.555 40,073 3 177 1 1 67,243,712 14.8 38.7 39.8 0.00058 0.00059 85,196,054
COMMERCIAL 3.9 10.6 0.8 1,011.0 16.1 1,042.4 0.351 0.995 0.300 1.065 2.710 1.350 545 - - - - - 0.0 0.2 0.2 - - 686,492
DISTRIBUTION 7,071.0 6,545.9 142.7 10,412.5 223.1 24,395.2 16.297 37.400 6.312 1.571 61.580 77.972 9,586 52 2,724 5 - - 0.9 2.8 2.8 - - 587,151
PGPB 39, 575 8, 986 666 2, 625 13, 691 65, 542 27. 537 126. 363 52. 011 3. 415 209. 327 238. 148 1, 848 1 68 7 248 49, 415, 171 5. 845 15. 8 15. 9 0. 00032 0. 00032 42, 127, 667
CPGs 39,562 8,608 658 2,622 13,296 64,746 27.323 125.656 51.98 3.409 208.368 237.302 1,624 - - - - 49,415,171 5.7 15.1 15.2 0.00031 0.00031 42,032,742
PIPELINES 13.1 373.4 7.7 2.4 357.0 753.6 0.108 0.378 0.002 0.000 0.489 0.105 135 1 68 7 248 - 0.1 0.6 0.6 - - 67,429
TERMINALS 0.3 4.1 0.4 0.1 37.8 42.7 0.106 0.329 0.029 0.005 0.470 0.741 88 - - - - - 0.0 0.1 0.1 - - 27,496
PPQ 9, 421 7, 118 710 2, 387 1, 710 21, 346 133. 447 740. 948 32. 247 13. 497 920. 139 488. 838 35, 553 1 0. 010 1 80 6, 071, 703 6. 032 18. 3 19. 1 0. 00302 0. 00314 53, 278, 139
CPQ Camargo - - - 1.7 0.1 1.7 - - 0.000 - 0.000 0.002 16 - - - - - - - - - - 110,610
CPQ Cangrejera 34.8 3,163.3 236.6 846.9 1,061.0 5,342.7 39.175 233.244 14.327 4.664 291.411 175.793 13,996 - - - - 2,958,090 2.8 10.6 10.6 0.00359 0.00359 23,012,921
CPQ Escoln 0.1 282.9 6.2 19.7 99.6 408.5 0.116 0.247 0.119 0.020 0.502 0.258 443 - - - - 27,745 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.00610 0.00610 73,852
CPQ Morelos 6,212.7 1,659.0 169.0 1,202.2 158.4 9,401.4 71.934 444.996 12.498 7.971 537.399 192.952 1,573 - - - - 1,787,962 1.5 4.5 4.9 0.00249 0.00276 17,309,660
CPQ Pajaritos 0.7 653.1 37.8 90.7 25.4 807.7 7.561 19.418 - - 26.978 52.451 19,300 - - - - 528,564 0.3 1.0 1.0 0.00195 0.00195 3,016,280
CPQ Tula 0.1 32.0 15.0 20.0 28.1 95.1 0.085 3.020 2.890 0.367 6.362 3.212 84 - - - - 51,416 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.00333 0.00333 850,414
Pipelines - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 0.010 1 80 - - - - - - -
HAZARDOUS
WASTE
GENERATI ON
GREENHOUSE
GASES
( GHG)
ENERGY CONSUMPTI ON
WATER
HANDLI NG
TOTAL
EMI SSI ONS
WASTE
GENERATION
REPORTED
NUMBER OF
SPILLS
ESTIMATED
SPILLED
QUANTITY
REPORTED
NUMBER OF
LEAKS
ESTIMATED
LEAKED
QUANTITY
PEP, PGPB, PPQ
PRODUCTION AND
CRUDE OIL PROCESS
CO
2
EMISSIONS
(MTON)
(MBCOE)
VENTING) (MBCOE)
(MBCOE/TTON)
USE OF CRUDE
WATER (m
3
)
TOTAL PEMEX 516, 917 91, 088 19, 315 55, 077 32, 653 715, 049 389 1, 856 317 51 2, 614 1, 633 701, 678 283 3, 180 116 348 413, 722, 677 37. 444 105. 2 117. 1 0. 00025 0. 00028 191, 095, 711
PEP 71, 990 41, 602 1, 022 13, 466 13, 160 141, 239 81. 162 319. 677 0. 475 0. 121 401. 435 319. 951 614, 072 226 211 102 19 290, 992, 091 9. 925 29. 3 39. 3 0. 00010 0. 00013 9, 220, 207
RMNE 40,370.3 10,032.0 215.3 54.0 1,335.4 52,007.1 0.492 1.419 - - 1.911 2.842 1,937 1 - 1 - 203,213,907 4.1 11.3 17.0 0.00006 0.00008 26,834
RMSO 11,461.9 5,976.9 184.9 1,254.6 1,040.2 19,918.5 53.102 116.885 - - 169.988 88.839 55,016 2 - - - 27,702,999 2.0 5.6 8.3 0.00020 0.00030 3,305,969
RN 11,923.2 5,020.8 188.2 7,610.1 6,811.1 31,553.5 0.314 1.473 0.464 0.074 2.325 1.716 897 141 167 65 2 21,676,397 1.1 2.8 4.1 0.00013 0.00019 2,946,976
RS 5,453.3 9,072.4 160.2 4,547.0 3,580.7 22,813.6 0.823 2.682 0.011 0.047 3.563 3.014 702 80 43 36 18 38,398,788 2.2 8.1 8.4 0.00021 0.00022 2,917,250
UPMP 2,781.0 11,500.0 273.2 - 392.3 14,946.7 26.431 197.217 - - 223.649 223.540 555,521 2 1 - - - 0.6 1.5 1.5 - - 23,179
PR 395, 931 33, 382 16, 917 36, 599 4, 093 486, 922 147. 234 669. 293 232. 634 33. 992 1, 083. 153 585. 876 50, 205 55 2, 901 6 1 67, 243, 712 15. 642 41. 7 42. 8 0. 00062 0. 00064 86, 469, 698
REFINERIES 388,855.6 26,826.0 16,773.2 25,175.9 3,853.8 461,484.5 130.586 630.898 226.021 31.356 1,018.863 506.555 40,073 3 177 1 1 67,243,712 14.8 38.7 39.8 0.00058 0.00059 85,196,054
COMMERCIAL 3.9 10.6 0.8 1,011.0 16.1 1,042.4 0.351 0.995 0.300 1.065 2.710 1.350 545 - - - - - 0.0 0.2 0.2 - - 686,492
DISTRIBUTION 7,071.0 6,545.9 142.7 10,412.5 223.1 24,395.2 16.297 37.400 6.312 1.571 61.580 77.972 9,586 52 2,724 5 - - 0.9 2.8 2.8 - - 587,151
PGPB 39, 575 8, 986 666 2, 625 13, 691 65, 542 27. 537 126. 363 52. 011 3. 415 209. 327 238. 148 1, 848 1 68 7 248 49, 415, 171 5. 845 15. 8 15. 9 0. 00032 0. 00032 42, 127, 667
CPGs 39,562 8,608 658 2,622 13,296 64,746 27.323 125.656 51.98 3.409 208.368 237.302 1,624 - - - - 49,415,171 5.7 15.1 15.2 0.00031 0.00031 42,032,742
PIPELINES 13.1 373.4 7.7 2.4 357.0 753.6 0.108 0.378 0.002 0.000 0.489 0.105 135 1 68 7 248 - 0.1 0.6 0.6 - - 67,429
TERMINALS 0.3 4.1 0.4 0.1 37.8 42.7 0.106 0.329 0.029 0.005 0.470 0.741 88 - - - - - 0.0 0.1 0.1 - - 27,496
PPQ 9, 421 7, 118 710 2, 387 1, 710 21, 346 133. 447 740. 948 32. 247 13. 497 920. 139 488. 838 35, 553 1 0. 010 1 80 6, 071, 703 6. 032 18. 3 19. 1 0. 00302 0. 00314 53, 278, 139
CPQ Camargo - - - 1.7 0.1 1.7 - - 0.000 - 0.000 0.002 16 - - - - - - - - - - 110,610
CPQ Cangrejera 34.8 3,163.3 236.6 846.9 1,061.0 5,342.7 39.175 233.244 14.327 4.664 291.411 175.793 13,996 - - - - 2,958,090 2.8 10.6 10.6 0.00359 0.00359 23,012,921
CPQ Escoln 0.1 282.9 6.2 19.7 99.6 408.5 0.116 0.247 0.119 0.020 0.502 0.258 443 - - - - 27,745 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.00610 0.00610 73,852
CPQ Morelos 6,212.7 1,659.0 169.0 1,202.2 158.4 9,401.4 71.934 444.996 12.498 7.971 537.399 192.952 1,573 - - - - 1,787,962 1.5 4.5 4.9 0.00249 0.00276 17,309,660
CPQ Pajaritos 0.7 653.1 37.8 90.7 25.4 807.7 7.561 19.418 - - 26.978 52.451 19,300 - - - - 528,564 0.3 1.0 1.0 0.00195 0.00195 3,016,280
CPQ Tula 0.1 32.0 15.0 20.0 28.1 95.1 0.085 3.020 2.890 0.367 6.362 3.212 84 - - - - 51,416 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.00333 0.00333 850,414
Pipelines - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 0.010 1 80 - - - - - - -
HAZARDOUS
WASTE
GENERATI ON
GREENHOUSE
GASES
( GHG)
ENERGY CONSUMPTI ON
WATER
HANDLI NG
TOTAL
EMI SSI ONS
WASTE
GENERATION
REPORTED
NUMBER OF
SPILLS
ESTIMATED
SPILLED
QUANTITY
REPORTED
NUMBER OF
LEAKS
ESTIMATED
LEAKED
QUANTITY
PEP, PGPB, PPQ
PRODUCTION AND
CRUDE OIL PROCESS
CO
2
EMISSIONS
(MTON)
(MBCOE)
VENTING) (MBCOE)
(MBCOE/TTON)
USE OF CRUDE
WATER (m
3
)
TOTAL PEMEX 516, 917 91, 088 19, 315 55, 077 32, 653 715, 049 389 1, 856 317 51 2, 614 1, 633 701, 678 283 3, 180 116 348 413, 722, 677 37. 444 105. 2 117. 1 0. 00025 0. 00028 191, 095, 711
PEP 71, 990 41, 602 1, 022 13, 466 13, 160 141, 239 81. 162 319. 677 0. 475 0. 121 401. 435 319. 951 614, 072 226 211 102 19 290, 992, 091 9. 925 29. 3 39. 3 0. 00010 0. 00013 9, 220, 207
RMNE 40,370.3 10,032.0 215.3 54.0 1,335.4 52,007.1 0.492 1.419 - - 1.911 2.842 1,937 1 - 1 - 203,213,907 4.1 11.3 17.0 0.00006 0.00008 26,834
RMSO 11,461.9 5,976.9 184.9 1,254.6 1,040.2 19,918.5 53.102 116.885 - - 169.988 88.839 55,016 2 - - - 27,702,999 2.0 5.6 8.3 0.00020 0.00030 3,305,969
RN 11,923.2 5,020.8 188.2 7,610.1 6,811.1 31,553.5 0.314 1.473 0.464 0.074 2.325 1.716 897 141 167 65 2 21,676,397 1.1 2.8 4.1 0.00013 0.00019 2,946,976
RS 5,453.3 9,072.4 160.2 4,547.0 3,580.7 22,813.6 0.823 2.682 0.011 0.047 3.563 3.014 702 80 43 36 18 38,398,788 2.2 8.1 8.4 0.00021 0.00022 2,917,250
UPMP 2,781.0 11,500.0 273.2 - 392.3 14,946.7 26.431 197.217 - - 223.649 223.540 555,521 2 1 - - - 0.6 1.5 1.5 - - 23,179
PR 395, 931 33, 382 16, 917 36, 599 4, 093 486, 922 147. 234 669. 293 232. 634 33. 992 1, 083. 153 585. 876 50, 205 55 2, 901 6 1 67, 243, 712 15. 642 41. 7 42. 8 0. 00062 0. 00064 86, 469, 698
REFINERIES 388,855.6 26,826.0 16,773.2 25,175.9 3,853.8 461,484.5 130.586 630.898 226.021 31.356 1,018.863 506.555 40,073 3 177 1 1 67,243,712 14.8 38.7 39.8 0.00058 0.00059 85,196,054
COMMERCIAL 3.9 10.6 0.8 1,011.0 16.1 1,042.4 0.351 0.995 0.300 1.065 2.710 1.350 545 - - - - - 0.0 0.2 0.2 - - 686,492
DISTRIBUTION 7,071.0 6,545.9 142.7 10,412.5 223.1 24,395.2 16.297 37.400 6.312 1.571 61.580 77.972 9,586 52 2,724 5 - - 0.9 2.8 2.8 - - 587,151
PGPB 39, 575 8, 986 666 2, 625 13, 691 65, 542 27. 537 126. 363 52. 011 3. 415 209. 327 238. 148 1, 848 1 68 7 248 49, 415, 171 5. 845 15. 8 15. 9 0. 00032 0. 00032 42, 127, 667
CPGs 39,562 8,608 658 2,622 13,296 64,746 27.323 125.656 51.98 3.409 208.368 237.302 1,624 - - - - 49,415,171 5.7 15.1 15.2 0.00031 0.00031 42,032,742
PIPELINES 13.1 373.4 7.7 2.4 357.0 753.6 0.108 0.378 0.002 0.000 0.489 0.105 135 1 68 7 248 - 0.1 0.6 0.6 - - 67,429
TERMINALS 0.3 4.1 0.4 0.1 37.8 42.7 0.106 0.329 0.029 0.005 0.470 0.741 88 - - - - - 0.0 0.1 0.1 - - 27,496
PPQ 9, 421 7, 118 710 2, 387 1, 710 21, 346 133. 447 740. 948 32. 247 13. 497 920. 139 488. 838 35, 553 1 0. 010 1 80 6, 071, 703 6. 032 18. 3 19. 1 0. 00302 0. 00314 53, 278, 139
CPQ Camargo - - - 1.7 0.1 1.7 - - 0.000 - 0.000 0.002 16 - - - - - - - - - - 110,610
CPQ Cangrejera 34.8 3,163.3 236.6 846.9 1,061.0 5,342.7 39.175 233.244 14.327 4.664 291.411 175.793 13,996 - - - - 2,958,090 2.8 10.6 10.6 0.00359 0.00359 23,012,921
CPQ Escoln 0.1 282.9 6.2 19.7 99.6 408.5 0.116 0.247 0.119 0.020 0.502 0.258 443 - - - - 27,745 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.00610 0.00610 73,852
CPQ Morelos 6,212.7 1,659.0 169.0 1,202.2 158.4 9,401.4 71.934 444.996 12.498 7.971 537.399 192.952 1,573 - - - - 1,787,962 1.5 4.5 4.9 0.00249 0.00276 17,309,660
CPQ Pajaritos 0.7 653.1 37.8 90.7 25.4 807.7 7.561 19.418 - - 26.978 52.451 19,300 - - - - 528,564 0.3 1.0 1.0 0.00195 0.00195 3,016,280
CPQ Tula 0.1 32.0 15.0 20.0 28.1 95.1 0.085 3.020 2.890 0.367 6.362 3.212 84 - - - - 51,416 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.00333 0.00333 850,414
Pipelines - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 0.010 1 80 - - - - - - -

safety, health
and environmental
protection
a
n
n
u
a
l

r
e
p
o
r
t

2
0
0
5
PETRLEOS MEXI CANOS
directory
Col. Huasteca,11311
Mexico, D.F.
Tel. 55 1944 9071
Fax. 55 1944 8946
www.pemex.com
COMMENTS:
API Systems
of good solvents.
containing carbon.
Catalyst
Cryogenic processes
Pits
Drill cuttings
Drilling muds
Floating membraness
Frequency rate
Fugitive emissions
Gravity rate
control reach.
compounds.
CONCEPT AND DESIGN
TRANSLATION
PHOTOGRAPHY
Eduardo de la Vega
Hctor Elorduy
www.pemex.com
Luis Ramrez Corzo
DIRECTOR GENERAL
Marcos Ramrez Silva
GENERAL ATTORNEY
a
g
g
r
e
g
a
t
e
d

e
c
o
n
o
m
i
c

v
a
l
u
e
A
N
N
U
A
L

R
E
P
O
R
T

2
0
0
5
S
A
F
E
T
Y
,

H
E
A
L
T
H

A
N
D

E
N
V
I
R
O
N
M
E
N
T
A
L

P
R
O
T
E
C
T
I
O
N
P
E
T
R
L
E
O
S

M
E
X
I
C
A
N
O
S
Heavy metals
ISO-14001
systems.
Liquid recuperator
liquids.
Methane (CH4)
compounds.
Oily sludges
dams, etc.).
Oily waters
Phenolic waters
Phenols
OH- radicals.
Secondary energy
Sour gas
glossary
Sour waters
Sulfur Oxides (SOx)
compounds (TNMVOC)
(TVOC)
Vapor recuperator
Abbreviations
MW Mega Wats
Verication letter

Mexico, D.F. May 24
th
, 2006
1. Reports content
accounting methods.

crude water.
Management Ofce).
personnel.
I. Introduction
II. Scope
following:
ered reliable
must be available.
these estimates.

of this report
of future reports
latest version.

PEMEX Exploration
and Production
PEMEX Gas and Basic
Petrochemicals
Tamaulipas
Tamaulipas
Veracruz
Tamaulipas
compression battery
terminal
r
e
l
e
v
a
n
t

n
o
t
e
s

a
b
o
u
t

t
h
i
s

r
e
p
o
r
t
Verication letter

Mexico, D.F. May 24
th
, 2006
1. Reports content
accounting methods.

crude water.
Management Ofce).
personnel.
I. Introduction
II. Scope
following:
ered reliable
must be available.
these estimates.

of this report
of future reports
latest version.

PEMEX Exploration
and Production
PEMEX Gas and Basic
Petrochemicals
Tamaulipas
Tamaulipas
Veracruz
Tamaulipas
compression battery
terminal
r
e
l
e
v
a
n
t

n
o
t
e
s

a
b
o
u
t

t
h
i
s

r
e
p
o
r
t

Pemex 2005 Safety, Health, and Environmental Protection

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Pemex 2005 Safety, Health, and Environmental Protection

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

safety, health

You might also like