Professional Documents
Culture Documents
S. Wichienchot
a,
*
, M. Jatupornpipat
b
, R.A. Rastall
c
a
Nutraceutical and Functional Food Research and Development Center, Faculty of Agro-Industry, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla 90112, Thailand
b
Department of Applied Biology, Faculty of Science, King Mongkuts Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok 10520, Thailand
c
School of Food Biosciences, The University of Reading, Whiteknights, Reading, UK
a r t i c l e i n f o
Article history:
Received 26 May 2009
Received in revised form 2 November 2009
Accepted 9 November 2009
Keywords:
Pitaya
Dragon fruit
Oligosaccharides
Prebiotic
Probiotic
a b s t r a c t
The major carbohydrates of white and red-esh pitayas (dragon fruit) were glucose, fructose and some
oligosaccharides (total concentrations of 86.2 and 89.6 g/kg, respectively). The molecular weight distribu-
tion of the extract was affected by the extraction solvent. The maximum oligosaccharides content
(27.40%), which included fractions with molecular weights of 273275, 448500 and 787911 Da, were
obtained using 80% ethanol extraction at room temperature (28 2 C). The low molecular weight frac-
tion, including glucose and fructose, was successfully removed by yeast cultivation. The molecular
weights of mixed oligosaccharides (716, 700, 490 and 474 Da) were conrmed by mass spectrometry.
The mixed oligosaccharides showed that they were resistant to hydrolysis by articial human gastric
juice and human a-amylase, giving maximum hydrolysis of 4.04% and 34.88%, respectively. The mixed
oligosaccharides were also found capable of stimulating the growth of lactobacilli and bidobacteria.
2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Pitaya (Hylocereus undatus (Haw.)) or dragon fruit is native to
Mexico, Central and South America (Benzing, 1990; Haber, 1983)
and has been grown in Vietnam for at least 100 years, following
its introduction by the French (Mizrahi, Nerd, & Nobel, 1997). A
member of the Cactaceae, it has trailing cladode stems modied
to act as leaves and bears spectacular ovoid fruit year-round which
has a bright red colour when mature, and contains white, crimson,
or pale yellow-esh, depending on the cultivar, interspersed with
small black seeds. In Thailand, one of the widely grown varieties
is H. undatus or red pitaya with white-esh. Other varieties that
have been commercialised are Hylocereus polyrhizus (red pitaya
with red-esh) and Hylocereus megalanthus (yellow pitaya) (Bar-
beau, 1990). Currently, there is much interest in developing this
crop for fresh fruit export beyond the local Asian markets of Sin-
gapore, Hong Kong, Taiwan, Philippines, Malaysia and Thailand
(Hoa, Clark, Waddell, & Woolf, 2006; Mizrahi et al., 1997).
Dragon fruit has been reported as a source of beta-carotene,
lycopene and vitamin E, with average concentrations of 1.4, 3.4
and 0.26 lg/100 g edible portion, respectively (Charoensiri, Kon-
gkachuicha, Suknicom, & Sungpuag, 2009). The seed of dragon fruit
contains 50% essential fatty acids, i.e., 48% linoleic acid (C18:2) and
1.5% linolenic acid (C18:3) (Arifn et al., 2008). Thus, dragon fruit
has potential for use as a source of functional ingredients to pro-
vide nutrients that may prevent nutrition-related diseases and im-
prove physical and mental well-being of the consumers.
Prebiotics are non-digestible oligosaccharides that benecially
affect the host by stimulating the growth and/or activity of one
or a limited number of bacteria in the colon, thus improving host
health (Gibson & Roberfroid, 1995). Ten samples from thirteen
fruits and vegetables and their parts from southern Thailand were
reported as potential sources of natural prebiotics with the highest
oligosaccharide content being 9.81% (w/w) (Thammarutwasik
et al., 2009). Dragon fruit was not included in that study. Chicory
and artichoke root have been used as natural sources of inulin
and oligofructose in the commercial production of prebiotics, hav-
ing oligosaccharide yields in the range of 1820% (Gibson & Rastall,
2006). As a potential source of high-yielding oligosaccharide for
commercial prebiotic production, dragon fruit was selected for
investigation, with respect to optimal extraction method, sugar
content and prebiotic properties.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Samples, chemicals, media and microorganisms
White-esh dragon fruits ( H. undatus) were imported from
Hoang Hau Dragon Fruit Farm, Co. Ltd., Vietnam. The fruits were
mediumsize packed in a padded paper box. Red-esh dragon fruits
(H. polyrhizus) were obtained from a local market in Chumphon,
Thailand. Unless otherwise stated, all chemical reagents and en-
zyme were obtained from SigmaAldrich Co. Ltd. Cheesecloth bags
0308-8146/$ - see front matter 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.11.026
* Corresponding author. Tel.: +66 74286389; fax: +66 74212889.
E-mail addresses: santad.w@psu.ac.th, wsantad@yahoo.com (S. Wichienchot).
Food Chemistry 120 (2010) 850857
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Food Chemistry
j our nal homepage: www. el sevi er . com/ l ocat e/ f oodchem
were prepared (23 14 cm). Anaerobic gas pack and Reinforced
Clostridium Medium were supplied by Oxoid, Ltd., Basingstoke,
UK. MRS broth was purchased from Merck, Co., Ltd., Darmstadt,
Germany and Rogosa SL Agar was purchased from Difco, Co., Ltd.,
USA. Bidobacterium bidum NCIMB 702715 was obtained from
the National Collections of Industrial Food and Marine Bacteria,
Aberdeen, UK. Lactobacillus delbrueckii BCC 13296 and Saccharomy-
ces cerevisiae BCC 12652 were obtained from BIOTEC Culture Col-
lection, Bangkok, Thailand.
2.2. Determination of sugar composition
Reducing sugar concentration was determined using the
dinitrosalicylic acid (DNS) assay and expressed as maltose equiva-
lents (Robertson et al., 2001). The assay was calibrated with malt-
ose standards from 0 to 1 mg/ml. Sample or glucose standard
solution (1 ml) was added to DNS solution (1 ml) and water
(1 ml). The mixture was boiled for 15 min and after cooling on
ice for 2 min, water (9 ml) was added before mixing and measuring
the absorbance at 540 nm. Content of reducing sugar in the sample
was compared to the standard curve of glucose. The total sugar
concentration, expressed as glucose equivalents, was determined
using the phenolsulphuric acid assay (Dubois, Gilles, Hamilton,
Rebers, & Smith, 1956). The assay was calibrated with D-glucose
standards from 0 to 100 lg/ml. Sample or glucose standard solu-
tion (1 ml) was added to 5% (w/v) phenol solution (1 ml). Concen-
trated sulphuric acid (5 ml) was then added and left for 10 min
prior to vigorous mixing. The samples and standards were left for
20 min at room temperature before reading the absorbance at
490 nm. The concentration of carbohydrate in the sample was cal-
culated by comparison with the standard curve of glucose. Mono-
saccharide and disaccharide were analysed by HPLC. Sample was
prepared in solution (1% w/v) and ltered through 0.45-lm
membrane; 20 ll sample were injected in a Zorbax Carbohydrate
column (4.6 150 mm, 5 lm resin). Mobile phase was acetoni-
trile:water (75:25) and ow rate was 0.5 ml/min. Refractive Index
(RI) detector was used and column oven temperature was 35 C.
Glucose and fructose were used as monosaccharide standards
and sucrose was used as a disaccharide standard. Qualitative anal-
ysis of sugar in the sample was determined by comparison to the
retention time of standard sugar. The concentration of sugar in
the sample was calculated by comparison with peak area of the
standard curve of the respective sugar.
2.3. Determination of molecular weight distribution of
oligosaccharides
Molecular weight of sample was analysed by gel permeation
chromatography (GPC) with refractive index detection. The analyt-
ical system consisted of Ultrahydrogel linear column (MWCO
100020,000,000) and Ultrahydrogel 120 column (MWCO 100
5000) connected in series with decreasing pore size. The ow rate
was 0.6 ml/min, the eluent was 0.1 M sodium nitrate and the oper-
ating temperature was 30 C. Samples and standards (pullulan
with different molecular weight, maltoheptaose, and glucose) were
ltered through a 0.45-lm syringe lter and the injection volume
was 20 ll. The system was calibrated with 8 standards consisting
of pullulan with average molecular weights of 788, 404, 112,
47.3, 22.8, 5.9 kDa, maltopentaose (0.828 kDa) and glucose
(0.180 kDa). External standards of maltopentaose (0.828 kDa) at
concentrations of 110 mg/ml were used to establish the area re-
sponse for quantication of the products. Oligosaccharides yield
was calculated by the summary of the percentage area of the oligo-
saccharides fraction. The molecular weight (MW) of oligosaccha-
rides was determined by comparing sample retention time to
those of the standard curve (Mountzouris, Gilmour, Jay, & Rastall,
1999). The molecular weight distribution of mixed oligosaccha-
rides after removal of low molecular weight fraction by yeast cul-
tivation was conrmed by mass spectrometry (Micromass, UK)
with ESI detector in positive mode (modied from Hernandez,
Muiz-Matute, Olano, Moreno, & Sanz, 2009).
2.4. Purication method
The extract obtained by 80% ethanol extraction at ambient tem-
perature was distilled by rotary evaporator at 175 mbar, 60 C and
rotating speed of 45 rpm. The concentrated extract was diluted
with distilled water in the ratio of 1:1 and redistilled again. This
step was repeated twice to removal residual ethanol in the extract.
Ethanol-free extract was adjusted to 20 Brix by addition of dis-
tilled water before 5% (v/v) inoculum (18 h culture of S. cerevisiae
BCC 12652) was inoculated. Cultivation was carried out at room
temperature (28 2 C) for 48 h to remove mostly glucose and
some fructose. Culture broth was then diluted with sterile distilled
water to 10 Brix and cultivation was carried out under the same
conditions for 6 h to remove mostly the remaining fructose in
the crude extract (modied from Hernandez et al., 2009).
2.5. Effect of extraction methods
White-esh dragon fruits ( H. undatus) and red-esh dragon
fruits ( H. polyrhizus) were used as raw material for this study.
The dragon fruit was peeled and the esh was extracted with 3 dif-
ferent solvents (distilled water, 20% ethanol and 80% ethanol).
Extraction by water at room temperature was done by mixing
water and the esh in the ratio of 2:1, stirring continuously and
leaving for 1 h at room temperature. The mixture was then ltered
through a cheesecloth bag while being pressed with a paddle blen-
der (Seward-Stomacher 400) to remove the seeds. Viscous juice ob-
tained was further evaporated by a rotary evaporator under
reduced pressure at 40 C. Sample was dried with a freeze dryer
before sugar composition, molecular weight distribution and pre-
biotic properties were analysed. Hot water extraction was done
by mixing hot water and the esh in the ratio of 2:1, stirring con-
tinuously and leaving for 1 h in a controlled temperature water
bath (85 2 C). The mixture was then ltered through a cheese-
cloth bag while being pressed by a stomacher to remove the seeds.
The sample was then dried and further analysed as mentioned
above. Extraction by 20% and 80% (v/v) ethanol were done using
the same manner and the mixture was left for 1 h at room temper-
ature. The sample was then dried and again analysed as above.
2.6. Effect of articial human gastric juice hydrolysis
Mixed oligosaccharides obtained by 80% ethanol extraction and
the juice without extraction from white-esh were tested for acid
resistance, compared to an inulin standard as a commercial prebi-
otic reference. Sample was dissolved in RO water to give a 1% (w/v)
solution. Articial human gastric juice was mimicked by using
hydrochloric acid buffer containing (in g/l): NaCl, 8; KCl, 0.2; Na
2
H-
PO
4
2H
2
O, 8.25; NaHPO
4
, 14.35; CaCl
2
2H
2
O, 0.1; MgCl
2
6H
2
O, 0.18.
The pH of the buffer was adjusted to 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 using 5 M HCl
(Korakli, Ganzle, & Vogel, 2002). HCl buffer (5 ml) at each pH was
added to the sample solution (5 ml) and the reaction mixture
was incubated in a water bath at a controlled temperature of
37 1 C for 6 h. Sample (1 ml) was taken periodically at 0, 0.5, 1,
2, 4 and 6 h. Reducing sugar content in the sample was determined
by DNS method (Robertson et al., 2001) and total sugar was deter-
mined by phenolsulphuric acid method (Dubois et al., 1956). Per-
centage hydrolysis of sample was calculated based on reducing
sugar liberated and total sugar content of the sample (Korakli
et al., 2002):
S. Wichienchot et al. / Food Chemistry 120 (2010) 850857 851
Hydrolysis%