The document summarizes the testing and evaluation of 7 different designs for a wind-powered vehicle (WPV). The designs tested different blade and hub combinations, including PVC blades, pinwheel blades made of cardboard, and different hub materials. Testing found that a single pinwheel placed at the front of the WPV, capturing the most wind, achieved the highest mass-time ratios of over 700 g/s consistently when carrying a 13 kg payload. This seventh design was determined to be the most effective at transporting weight over 2 meters.
The document summarizes the testing and evaluation of 7 different designs for a wind-powered vehicle (WPV). The designs tested different blade and hub combinations, including PVC blades, pinwheel blades made of cardboard, and different hub materials. Testing found that a single pinwheel placed at the front of the WPV, capturing the most wind, achieved the highest mass-time ratios of over 700 g/s consistently when carrying a 13 kg payload. This seventh design was determined to be the most effective at transporting weight over 2 meters.
The document summarizes the testing and evaluation of 7 different designs for a wind-powered vehicle (WPV). The designs tested different blade and hub combinations, including PVC blades, pinwheel blades made of cardboard, and different hub materials. Testing found that a single pinwheel placed at the front of the WPV, capturing the most wind, achieved the highest mass-time ratios of over 700 g/s consistently when carrying a 13 kg payload. This seventh design was determined to be the most effective at transporting weight over 2 meters.
Before making a decision on the final design of our wind-powered vehicle (WPV) we utilised the various blades and hubs we had designed by testing the WPV using the blades in various arrangements. We tested the WPV using initially the PVC blades attached to a Perspex hub, then attaching them to a wooden hub before implementing our pinwheel design. We also adjusted the arrangement of our blades such as trying the blades out the front of the WPV and also testing the blades by position them in the middle of the WPV. Another factor we took into consideration for out testing was the use of two blades, this included using two pinwheels or mixing the PVC blades and the pinwheel, trying them in various arrangements.
5.1 Analysis, testing and evaluation
Design 1: PVC blades with Perspex hub
The first design we tested utilised 6 PVC blades, which were position strategically around a Perspex hub. The blades were placed on the Perspex hub by using 6 u- clamps that allowed us to adjust the angle of the blades. The blades were turned on an angle in a way, which allowed them to capture the greatest amount of wind as seen in figure 1. A single pulley system was utilised in this design.
Table 1: PVC blades with Perspex hub
The results from table 1 clearly indicate that the design using PVC blades with a Perspex hub is rather ineffective in achieving a mass-time ratio of 800g/s or greater. The weight of the Perspex hub and blades together was quite heavy and the start up time for the blades to start turning quickly was quite long, making it unproductive.
Figure 1: PVC blades with Perspex hub Mass (g) Time (s) Mass/Time (g/s) 4000 15.1 265 7000 22.3 314 10000 32.8 305 Design 2: PVC blades with wooden hub
The second design implemented a wooden hub with 6 PVC blades, with holes drilled around the outside of the hub in which to place the blades as seen in figure 2. The blades were still able to be rotated which allowed us to adjust the angle, in order to capture the greatest amount of wind. A single pulley system was utilised in this design.
Table 2: PVC blades with wooden hub
After analysing the results in table 2 it was apparent that changing the hub didnt improve our results from table 1, in fact they had become worse. The excessive weight of the PVC blades was creating a problem making the design unsuccessful in achieving a mass-time ratio of 800g/s or greater.
Figure 2: PVC blades with wooden hub
Mass (g) Time (s) Mass/Time (g/s) 4000 14.6 274 7000 23.8 294 10000 33.5 299 Design 3: Pinwheel placed at the middle of WPV
In order to increase our mass-time ratio we decided to use lighter blades made out of a different material and use a different design all together. We implemented a pinwheel design using cardboard, with aluminium strips placed along the edges in order to make the structure more rigid. Initially we placed the pinwheel in the middle of the WPV to investigate whether an equal distribution of weight across the WPV would make an impact on our mass-time ratio. A single pulley system was utilised in this design.
Table 3: Pinwheel placed at the middle of WPV Mass (g) Time 1 (s) Time 2 (s) Time 3 (s) Time 4 (s) Mean time (s) Mass/Time (g/s) 4000 12.8 12.5 13.1 12.9 12.825 312 7000 14.5 15 14.9 15.2 14.9 470 10000 17.5 15.5 14.5 16 15.875 630 12000 15.7 16.8 17 15 16.125 744 13500 19.7 18.9 19.2 20 19.45 694
The results from table 3 clearly demonstrate a vast improvement on the PVC blades. Through the use of a lighter material our initial the start up time for the blades to start turning quickly was quite short, making it rather productive. The fact that the pinwheel covered a larger surface area than the PVC blades allowed it to trap more air, in order to move a lot faster. However we were only able to achieve the mass-time ration of 800g/s just once, instead consistently averaging between 600-700g/s.
Design 4: Pinwheel placed at the middle of WPV and front of WPV
To improve on our previous design we decided to use two pinwheels instead of one as we calculated that implementing two blades would assist in increasing the speed of WPV whilst carrying a large weight as seen in figure 3. Both pinwheels were made out of cardboard with aluminium strips to reinforce the cardboard as well as provide some extra mass in order to make the start up speed of the blades a lot quicker. Also when using two blades we made use of a two pulley system.
Table 4: Pinwheel placed at the middle of WPV and front of WPV
After analysing the results in table 4 it was apparent that adding an additional pinwheel didnt improve our results from table 3. The major problem with the design was that the front pinwheel was trapping most of the wind, meaning the pinwheel behind it only trapped minimal air. This resulted in the second pinwheel simply become extra, unnecessary weight, making the design ineffective in achieving a mass- time ratio of 800g/s or greater.
Figure 3: Pinwheel placed at the middle of WPV and front of WPV
Mass (g) Time (s) Mass/Time (g/s) 7000 13.3 526 10000 16.7 599 12000 19.9 603 Design 5: Pinwheel placed at the middle of WPV and wooden hub with PVC blades at front of WPV
In order to increase our mass-time ratio we decided to maintain our two blade design however we combined the PVC blades that were attached to a wooden hub and the pinwheel. The PVC blades attached to a wooden hub were positioned at the front of the WPV allowing for some air to travel to the pinwheel behind it, positioned in the middle of the WPV. The PVC blades were positioned at an angle to allow for maximum air to be trapped. A two pulley system was maintained for the design.
Table 5: Pinwheel placed at the middle of WPV and wooden hub with PVC blades at front of WPV
The results from table 5 again demonstrate there was hardly an improvement in our results when compared to the previous designs. The initial start up time for the PVC blades to start turning was too long, hence reducing our mass-time ratio.
Design 6: Pinwheel placed at the middle of WPV and Perspex hub with PVC blades at front of WPV
In order to improve our results we decided to continue with our two blade design however we decided to see if using a Perspex hub with PVC blades at front and a pinwheel in the middle would have any impact on our results. A two pulley system was maintained for the design
Table 6: Pinwheel placed at the middle of WPV and Perspex hub with PVC blades at front of WPV
After analysing the results in table 6 it was evident that using a Perspex hub instead of a wooden hub made no impact, with the PVC blades being heavy and ineffective. We were unsuccessful in achieve the mass-time ration of 800g/s or greater.
Mass (g) Time (s) Mass/Time (g/s) 10000 17.7 565 12000 21.6 632 Mass (g) Time (s) Mass/Time (g/s) 12000 25.6 469 12500 24.8 504 Design 7: Pinwheel placed at the front of WPV
To improve our results we decided to revert back to using a single pinwheel at the front of the WPV, with a single pulley system being utilised, simplifying the design of our WPV. The pinwheel was made from cardboard with aluminium strips placed along the edges to add more mass to help the initial turn of the pinwheel as well as reinforce the structure of the pinwheel. The pinwheel was placed at the front of the WPV to allow for maximum air to be trapped hence increasing the velocity of the vehicle as seen in figure 4. The pulley system was positioned on the driving wheels of the vehicle to increase the torque.
Table 7: Pinwheel placed at the front of WPV Mass (g) Time 1 (s) Time 2 (s) Time 3 (s) Time 4 (s) Mean time (s) Mass/Time (g/s) 11000 15.8 14.7 16.7 15.2 15.6 705 12000 17.5 16.4 17.9 18.1 17.475 687 13000 19.1 15.1 16.5 17.3 17 765 13500 17.6 18.9 19.2 17 18.175 743 15000 24.3 22.5 23.6 25.2 23.9 628
The results from table 7 clearly demonstrate that placing the pinwheel at the font of the WPV is our best option. We were able to achieve our best mass-time ratio of 861g/s, however we were unable to replicate the result. We were able to consistently achieve a mass-time ratio between 700-800g/s when there was a payload of 13kg on the vehicle, showing that having the pinwheel at the front of the WPV is our best design option.
Figure 4: Pinwheel placed at the front of WPV
5.2 Modification, redesign and rebuild
In order to determine which of our seven designs would be the most effective in transporting a payload over two meters and achieve a mass-time ratio of 800g/s or greater, we decided to create a graph of mass-time ratio versus payload, based on all the seven results from our testing. The graph would then allow us to compare which prototype had the highest mass-time ratio and had the most consistent results.
Figure 5: Graph of mass/time vs mass, comparing all 7 designs
After analysing the graph in figure 5 we were able to see that the pinwheel design placed at the front of the WPV was evidently our best WPV design. Through the use of a lighter material our initial the start up time for the blades to start turning quickly was quite short, making it rather productive. The fact the pinwheel was at the front and had a large surface area allowed it to trap more air, allowing the WPV to move a lot faster.
Based on this information we modified our vehicle by eliminating the PVC blades all together, instead preferring to use the pinwheel. We also decided to implement a single pinwheel system rather than combing PVC blades with the pinwheel or using two pinwheels. We rebuilt our vehicle by adding a pulley on the driving wheel in order to provide greater torque and allow the vehicle to move a lot faster.
After redesigning then modifying and rebuilding our WPV we were left with our end design that utilised a pinwheel at the front of the WPV and a single pulley system on the driving wheels as seen in figure 4.
6. Conclusion
In the final design of our WPV we decided to implement a pinwheel at the front of the vehicle, four wheels and a single pulley system that used a string as it didnt require any lubrication and provide a high mechanical efficiency. The overall weight of the vehicle was 1.8kg with the lightness helping the WPV to move faster. The initial start up time for the blades was rather quick, making it productive. The fact the pinwheel was at the front and had a large surface area allowed it to trap more air, allowing the WPV to move a lot faster. The pinwheel was made from cardboard with aluminium strips placed along the edges to add more mass to help the initial turn of the pinwheel as well as reinforce the structure of the pinwheel.
In the offical run of our vehicle our best mass-time ratio was 679g/s which was a disapoinemnt compared to our test runs.
Table 8: Official Run using final design
After analysing these results and comparing them to our trail runs, we were able to determine that the results we received were similar to what we had expected with 670g/s close to our averages of 700g/s.
In summation, our final design for our WPV was effective in achieving a mass-time ratio of approximately 700g/s. Despite this we were unable to achieve the ideal mass- time ratio of 800g/s making our WPV relatively ineffective in meeting the criteria, however it was still able to achieve a mass-time ratio greater than 2g/s and travel 2m comfortably. The mechatronics component of our WPV worked accurately and effectively, as the binary counter was able to calculate the distance travelled correctly.
Mass (g) Time (s) Mass/Time (g/s) 13200 19.44 679 11600 19.05 609