hopper discharge diameter, B 0.20 m total Height, H 2.20 m hopper height, h 1.04 m cone hopper angle, 30.01 deg material ANT material bulk density, 1,064 kg/m^3 wall friction angle, ' 25 deg Janssen ratio ,K j 0.40 MAXIMUM STRESS 1.00 z kg/m^2 kN/m^2 z kg/m^2 kN/m^2 0.00 - - 0.00 - - 1.16 483 5 0.00 225 2 1.16 1,678 16 0 782 8 2.20 294 3 0 137 1 1270 21.16666667 w 0.352777778 pb 1000 g 9.81 k 1.4 dp 0.1 0.000194195 0.032756349 0.172756349 172.756349 TANGENTIAL HOPPER OVERLOAD FACTOR = CYLINDER NORMAL 0 483 1678 294 0 1 2 3 -20,000 -15,000 -10,000 -5,000 0 5,000 d i s t a n c e
f r o m
t o p
o f
s i l o , z
( m )
normal wall pressure, p (kg/m^3) FILLING DISCHARGING MAXIMUM HYDROSTATIC SILO OUTLINE 1 2 2 2 cylinder tons/m^3 angle of repose FILLING MNM 2.5 34.2 2,500 z RDC 3.046 39.6 3,046 0 ## 0 0 ## HAH 2.51 48 2,510 0.2 ## ## # ## CRL 2.67 36.7 2,670 0.5 ## ## # ## CAJ 2.782 47.2 2,782 0.7 ## ## # ## MSC 2.55 36.6 2,550 0.9 ## ## # ## CB L 0.739 38.8 739 1 ## ## 0 ## AM L 0.97 49.6 970 1 ## ## DOL 1.56 38.2 1,560 1 ## ## LS L 1.48 40.6 1,480 2 ## ## LS F 1.6 40 1,600 2 ## ## SPL 2 40 2,000 2 ## ## NSG 1.38 37.2 1,380 2 ## ## SO 1.85 33 1,850 GOA 1.97 42.1 1,970 ## ni 1 ## 2 -1 RBR 2.42 35 2,420 0.2 ## 1 -1 MBR 2.86 35 2,860 0.4 ## 1 -1 BLM L 1.15 35 1,150 0.6 ## 1 -1 HLP 0.61 30 610 0.8 ## 0 -1 ANT 1.064 49.6 1,064 1 ## 0 -1 ST SLAG 1.6 37.2 1,600 DISCHARGING z 0 ## # 0.2 ## ## 0.5 ## ## 0.7 ## ## 0.9 ## ## 1 ## ## 1 ## 1 ## 2 ## 2 ## 2 ## 2 ## 0 kf 2 ## 0 ## 0.2 ## 0 ## 0.4 H(o) 2 ## 0 ## 0.6 ## 0 ## 0.8 nf 7 ## 0 ## 1 ## 0 ## 0 ## ## ## 0 1 ## ## ## 5 0 ## 1 ## ## ## 16 0 ## 2 ## ## ## 3 1 ## 1 ## 1 ## ## ## 8 2 ## ## ## 7 2 ## ## ## 5 2 ## ## ## 3 normal pressure, p # sliding friction between material and wall, 0 # 0 shear stress along wall, vertical pressure at point, q ni kf nf 1 ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## 0 1 ## 0 ## 0 ## 0 ## 0 61 0 0 ## ## 1 ## ## 2 ## ## 3 ## ## 4 The borders between funnel and mass flow, which result from the calculations of Jenike [7], are shown in figure 4a for the wedge shaped hopper and in figure 4b for the conical hopper. In the diagrams the wall friction angle j x is drawn over the hopper slope angle Q measured against the vertical. The effective angle of internal friction j e , which is a measure of the internal friction of the bulk solid, is the parameter of the mass flow/funnel flow borderlines. The borderlines separate all pairs of values leading to mass flow from those leading to funnel flow. Figure 4a: Design diagram for mass flow (wedge-shaped hopper) Figure 4b: Design diagram for mass flow (conical hopper) wall friction angle j x hopper slope angle Q measured against the vertical The effective angle of internal friction j e 0 55 The borders between funnel and mass flow, which result from the calculations of Jenike [7], are shown in figure 4a for the wedge shaped hopper and in figure 4b for the conical hopper. In the diagrams the wall friction angle j x is drawn over the hopper slope angle Q measured against the vertical. The effective angle of internal friction j e , which is a measure of the internal friction of the bulk solid, is the parameter of the mass flow/funnel flow borderlines. The borderlines separate all pairs of values leading to mass flow from those leading to funnel flow. Figure 4a: Design diagram for mass flow (wedge-shaped hopper) Figure 4b: Design diagram for mass flow (conical hopper) wall friction angle j x hopper slope angle Q measured against the vertical The effective angle of internal friction j e 0 2 55 2.5 y = 0.0091x + 2 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 0 20 The borders between funnel and mass flow, which result from the calculations of Jenike [7], are shown in figure 4a for the wedge shaped hopper and in figure 4b for the conical hopper. In the diagrams the wall friction angle j x is drawn over the hopper slope angle Q measured against the vertical. The effective angle of internal friction j e , which is a measure of the internal friction of the bulk solid, is the parameter of the mass flow/funnel flow borderlines. The borderlines separate all pairs of values leading to mass flow from those leading to funnel flow. y = 0.0091x + 2 20 40 60 Series1 Linear (Series1) The borders between funnel and mass flow, which result from the calculations of Jenike [7], are shown in figure 4a for the wedge shaped hopper and in figure 4b for the conical hopper. In the diagrams the wall friction angle j x is drawn over the hopper slope angle Q measured against the vertical. The effective angle of internal friction j e , which is a measure of the internal friction of the bulk solid, is the parameter of the mass flow/funnel flow borderlines. The borderlines separate all pairs of values leading to mass flow from those leading to funnel flow. The borders between funnel and mass flow, which result from the calculations of Jenike [7], are shown in figure 4a for the wedge shaped hopper and in figure 4b for the conical hopper. In the diagrams the wall friction angle j x is drawn over the hopper slope angle Q measured against the vertical. The effective angle of internal friction j e , which is a measure of the internal friction of the bulk solid, is the parameter of the mass flow/funnel flow borderlines. The borderlines separate all pairs of values leading to mass flow from those leading to funnel flow. The borders between funnel and mass flow, which result from the calculations of Jenike [7], are shown in figure 4a for the wedge shaped hopper and in figure 4b for the conical hopper. In the diagrams the wall friction angle j x is drawn over the hopper slope angle Q measured against the vertical. The effective angle of internal friction j e , which is a measure of the internal friction of the bulk solid, is the parameter of the mass flow/funnel flow borderlines. The borderlines separate all pairs of values leading to mass flow from those leading to funnel flow.