In response to the question, "And who is my neighbor?", the Lord Jesus, in Luke 10:30-37, told the story that is better known as the parable of the "Good Samaritan". In this very graphic portrayal of what it means to love one's neighbor, Jesus puts in bold contrast, the callousness and insensitivity of the priest and the Levite with the concern and compassion of the Samaritan. Given their involvement in things religious, we would expect that the priest and the Levite would have been the ones that showed compassion to the wounded man, but they didn't. It is possible that both the priest and the Levite were on their way to "church",and did not have the time for a work of compassion. No doubt they could very easily rationalize their failure to minister to the needy traveler.
If we grant that the priest and the Levite might have had a "good reason" for not giving assistance, it must also be pointed out that the Samaritan had better reasons for not giving aid. First, he was of another race, and the race relations were not good. Secondly, the help that he gave was costly to him and it is not likely that he would be compensated by the wounded man. thirdly, he took a great risk in stopping to give aid. If someone else had come along at the time, he could have been charged with the crime, or been accused of stealing from the dying man. He had good reasons for non-involvement but he showed compassion at a great risk to himself. The aid that he gave was risky and costly. I believe that there is a message in this parable that parallels the situation of many white Christians who would minister to needy blacks.
Original Title
1992 Issue 10 - Releasing the "Good Samaritan:" Counsel on Improving Race Relations - Counsel of Chalcedon
In response to the question, "And who is my neighbor?", the Lord Jesus, in Luke 10:30-37, told the story that is better known as the parable of the "Good Samaritan". In this very graphic portrayal of what it means to love one's neighbor, Jesus puts in bold contrast, the callousness and insensitivity of the priest and the Levite with the concern and compassion of the Samaritan. Given their involvement in things religious, we would expect that the priest and the Levite would have been the ones that showed compassion to the wounded man, but they didn't. It is possible that both the priest and the Levite were on their way to "church",and did not have the time for a work of compassion. No doubt they could very easily rationalize their failure to minister to the needy traveler.
If we grant that the priest and the Levite might have had a "good reason" for not giving assistance, it must also be pointed out that the Samaritan had better reasons for not giving aid. First, he was of another race, and the race relations were not good. Secondly, the help that he gave was costly to him and it is not likely that he would be compensated by the wounded man. thirdly, he took a great risk in stopping to give aid. If someone else had come along at the time, he could have been charged with the crime, or been accused of stealing from the dying man. He had good reasons for non-involvement but he showed compassion at a great risk to himself. The aid that he gave was risky and costly. I believe that there is a message in this parable that parallels the situation of many white Christians who would minister to needy blacks.
In response to the question, "And who is my neighbor?", the Lord Jesus, in Luke 10:30-37, told the story that is better known as the parable of the "Good Samaritan". In this very graphic portrayal of what it means to love one's neighbor, Jesus puts in bold contrast, the callousness and insensitivity of the priest and the Levite with the concern and compassion of the Samaritan. Given their involvement in things religious, we would expect that the priest and the Levite would have been the ones that showed compassion to the wounded man, but they didn't. It is possible that both the priest and the Levite were on their way to "church",and did not have the time for a work of compassion. No doubt they could very easily rationalize their failure to minister to the needy traveler.
If we grant that the priest and the Levite might have had a "good reason" for not giving assistance, it must also be pointed out that the Samaritan had better reasons for not giving aid. First, he was of another race, and the race relations were not good. Secondly, the help that he gave was costly to him and it is not likely that he would be compensated by the wounded man. thirdly, he took a great risk in stopping to give aid. If someone else had come along at the time, he could have been charged with the crime, or been accused of stealing from the dying man. He had good reasons for non-involvement but he showed compassion at a great risk to himself. The aid that he gave was risky and costly. I believe that there is a message in this parable that parallels the situation of many white Christians who would minister to needy blacks.
who ismy neighbor?", the Lord]esus,in Luke 10:30-37, told the story that is better knownas the parable of the "Good Samaritan". In thisvery graphic portrayal of what it means to love one's neighbor, ]esusputsin bold contrast, thecallousness and insensitivity of the priest and the Levite with the concern and compassion of the Samaritan. Giventheirinvolvement in things religious, we would expect that the priest and the Levite would have been the ones that showed compassion to the wounded man, but they didn't. It is possible that both the priest and the Levitewereontheirwayto"church",and did not have the time for a work of compassion. No doubt they could very easily rationalize their failure to minister to the needy traveler. If we grant that the priest and the Levite might have had a "good reason" for not giving assistance, it must also be pointed out that the Samaritan had better reasons for not giving aid. First, he was of another race, and the race relations were not good. Secondly, the help that he gave was costly to him and it is not likely that he would be compensated by the wounded man. 1birdly, he took a great risk in stopping to give aid. If someoneelsehadcomealongatthetime, he could have been charged with the crime, or been accused of stealing from the dying man. He had good reasons for non-involvement but he showed compassion at a great risk to hitnself. The aid that he gave was risky and costly. Ibelieve that there isa message in this parable that parallels the situation of many white Christians who would minister to needy blacks. In this modem paralleloftheparable, let's posit black people as the victim. Theyhave been mugged on the highway of life. Ever since we have been in this country, we have been used. We were brought here as slaves in the first place. The Abolitionist, for the most pan, did not care about the slaves; the issue of slavery was used to cover the hidden agenda. The Reconstructionist did not care about black people, their primary concern was to punish the South and to destroy a way of life . As late as the Civil- Rights movement, there were those who attempted to use the legitimate aspirations of black people to push a revolutionary agenda. Some are still at it. Themassesofblackpeopletoday,are constantly being propagandized and motivated in a direction that is not in their best long term interest. We need help. The ''bleeding-heart'' white liberal, and the black demagogues still have their agendas, and they continue to use black people as pawns and pass by the real needs of the black community. Then along comes the "good Samaritan white Christian'" he is concerned and has the compassion buthishandsare tiedandhe does not render the assistance that he. could. In the early days of the Civil-Rights movement, the leaders sought to dramatize the plight of black people, in order to prick the consciences of white people who were not aware of many of the conditions that impacted upon the lives of black people. They did an excellent job. As a matter ofJact, thejob was too well done. For almost thirty years, ormore, themassmediahascreated a national guilt complex in the minds of many white people. This guilt complex has put many white people in a position to be used by manipulative blacks. Ithas also caused some to be shy and hesitant in dealing with black people, lest they should be misunderstood and offend. This mass guilt complex has many of my white Christian brothers in the position of being like the "good Samaritan", that has a heart full of compassion, but his hands are tied. In the providence of God, I would like to be one that will help to untie the hands of the "good Samaritan". I would like to remove the cloud of guilt and timidity that too many of my white brethrenlaborunder. How can I do this? Well! I don't know for sure, but below are some starters: 1) Don't allow yourself to be intimidated. Even if you don't feel intimidated, somewhere along the way, someone will confront you with some variation of the theme: "you can't understand", or ''you don't know what it is to be black in America", "your white skin disqualifies you from understanding me", etc .. You don't nave to beastarto know astronomy. November, 1992 t lHE COUNSEL of ChaIcedon t 15 You don't have to be black to be in sympathy with black people. You are human, you have ChIistian compl1SSion, and you know that there Is aneed. What else do you need to know? We are all responsible to act on whatwe know, and as God gives. us more knowledge and undetstanding, we make the necessaty adjusttnents.But for the time being, we must act on the basis of what we know. Do not allow the fact that your are not omniscient to keep you from doing what you see that needs to be done. 2) Refuse to see the problem as an exclustve roceprohlem. The 'basic problem that you face in the black commUnity. Is the same problem that you will encounter in any community-its Sin. Sin has no color. Many false solutions have been imposed on the black airnmunlty and they have exacerbatid the problems, but the basic problem Is sin. Racism Is just one branch on the tree of Sin; it is not the whble tree. Toomu$.attentionhas been focused on the subject of Illcism, and many white Ouistians; for fear of expressing some unconscious ,acist attimdes have feared to venture into the black community. I am often reminded by some of my white brethren that God did not call me just to nlinister to black people, and they are right Bythe'same token, God did not call white Christians to nllitister only to whites. Christians cannotaIlowtheaitlfk:ialbarriers, erected by a: sinful society, to place liniits on their activities. .' . In our . incomplete state of siinctificadon, We ail have sorrievestiges of sin from which we have not been pilrged, but this should not be engaged in at the present. TIle same approach that one would take on the mission field iIi afotei.gu counttyls suflideiU: for your approach to the black community. , .. }. Be aggre,sstvein your contacts. . Don?t be afraid to challenge blacks. Share with them the truth as you commlssionthatsays:aIltheworldand understand it. Only the truth will set evetyCtel!ture: You don'meedanybody's men free. You don't have to argue, but approval. Ifthoseintheblackconununity please don't be patronizing. The are open to help, help them as much as patronizing attitude Is a sign of implied you can to do the job. If they are not inferiority of black people. when our doing the job and are not willing to be schoolslowerstandardsforblacks, when helped, then do what you can without "do-gooders" apologize for our frtilures, them. whenwellmeaningwhitescondoneblack Where is it written that blacks must short-comings, they donot helpusin the be reached by blacks and whites must be longrun. We mustleam to look facts in reachedbywhites?Weneedtoteexantine the face and we don't need White folks some of our presuppositions and see if suggestingthatevetythingthatBlacksdo we have not inccrporated into our can be explained,justified or Illtionalize. theology much of the conventional Much oUt Isjust ignorance and sin. wisdomrhllthasnoscripturalfoundation Love us enough to tell us the truth. to support it. . When a person begins to tell you about 5. Be willing to learn by trial and' slavety;J'ust tell them that you never had error. any slaves and that it was over one hundred years ago. When thy talk about What is the best way to approach prejudice and discrimination, just tell blacks that you wam to help? How do them that it'sa sin problem and that we you relate to them so that you can win theirccnfidenceandcooperation? Ihave all are guilty to some extent. been ttyingto be a leader ofblack people 4. Youdon'tneedanybody'sapproval for almost thirty years, and I will be the but God's. first to confess that I don't know. As I When I lived in Southern Illinois, look back over my career as a leader of there was a white Church in a smaII to black peopie, I see some failures and that had a busministty. TIle bus regularl some successes. Therelsno formula that wem to a larger town about twelve mil wiUalwayswork, You winsome and you away to pick"up children for Sunday lose some. But if your really care, you school. The bus picked up both black stay the course, learn from your failures and white children weekly. Some of . and keep onttying. Our call Is not to be black pastors in the toWn learned of . successful in theeyes of the world, butto and felc coustrained td go and speak be faithful. the white pastor about picking up blac If you have resources or skills that childrentotakethemtohiswhiteSunda you want to use in aiding the black School. He simply said to them that i co:mm1lUity, tty to locate someone in the they had been recruiting the children . black ccmmunity that you can work their churches, the children would no with. Ifnotgoitalone. Who knows,you be there (or his buSes to pick up, Ma might succeed and your success might black "leaders" either don't know 0 be used by God to provoke some in the don't care about the real needs of the black community to do better than they black ccmmuIury.1hey too have bee have done.' The black ccmmunity Is not victims of a failed "dvilrights" vision. the exclusive mission field of black Some whites feel that they have to go Christians. through somebody in order to work in I truSt that this short paper will help theblackcomm1lUity. Thefactthatthere "untie the hands of some Good is a great need Is because in too many Samaritans"; the victims need help. If inst,ances, we who are black Chti.?tians God has put a burden on your heart, are not dOing our job. You have a don't!etanybodytumyoUaround.n 16 '" lHE COUNSEL of Otalcedon November; 1992