Professional Documents
Culture Documents
15
of 5 mm thickness at different
normal stiffness and presented the test results.
Subject: Rock material and rock mass property testing (laboratory and in situ)
Keywords: lab testing, physical modeling, rock joints, rock mass
1 INTRODUCTION
Rocks are heterogeneous and quite often discontinuous due to
presence of joints. The presence of joints, fractures and other
planes of weakness reduce the shear strength.
Shear strength of rock joints depends on many factors
such as (a) stiffness of the surrounding rock mass (b) shear
rate (c) joint roughness (d) size of joint i.e. scale effect and
(e) joint condition i.e. unfilled joint/in filled joint. The correct
evaluation of shear strength of rock joints plays an important
role in the design of excavations in rocks, stability analysis of
rock slopes and design of rock socketed piles. In the past var-
ious attempts have been made to determine the shear strength
of rock joint simulating most of the influencing parameters in
the laboratory. However, very fewresearchers have considered
the influence of boundary conditions. The shear behavior of
the rock joints can be investigated under two different bound-
ary conditions i.e. constant normal load (CNL) i.e. K=0 and
constant normal stiffness (CNS) i.e. K>0.
The shear behaviour of planar rockjoints canbe investigated
inthe laboratorybyusinga conventional direct shear apparatus
where the normal load is kept constant (K=0) during the
shearing process. This particular mode of shearing is suitable
for situations where the surrounding rock freely allows the
joint to shear without restricting the dilation, thereby keeping
normal load constant during shearing process. Shear testing
under a CNL boundary condition is only beneficial for cases
such as non-reinforced rock slopes.
However, for non planar discontinuities, shearing results
in dilation as one asperity overrides another, and if the sur-
rounding rock mass is unable to deform sufficiently, then an
inevitable increase in the normal stress occurs during shearing.
Therefore, shearing of rough joints under such circumstances
no longer takes place under CNL, but rather under variable
normal load where stiffness of the surrounding rock mass
plays an important role in the shear behaviour. This particular
mode of shearing is called as shearing under CNS bound-
ary conditions i.e. K>0. For underground openings or rock
anchor-reinforced slopes, shear tests under K=0 conditions
are not appropriate. A more representative behaviour of joints
would be achieved if the shear tests are carried out under
boundary conditions of K>0.
The models available in the literature fail to appropriately
determine shear behavior of rock either due to limitations of
boundary condition or they are very simple like Patton (1966),
or depend on empiricism like JRC models given by Barton
(1973), or require estimation of complex input parameter like
Ladanyi and Archambault (1970). However, Indrartna et al.,
(1998, 1999&2003) andJianget al., (2004) attemptedtostudy
shear behavior of non planar joints under different normal
stiffness conditions i.e. CNL or CNS. But the special equip-
ments developed by the researcher has some limitation either
due to difficulty in putting the springs of required stiffness
between the load cell and the sample or to change the set of
the springs according to the normal stiffness of the surround-
ing rock like Indrartna et al., (1998, 1999 & 2003), Johnston
et al. (1987). The studies under K>0 conditions is available
mostly on small scale samples where asperities are triangu-
lar with equal angles for both the sides and roughness having
some JRC value.
In the present study, a detailed testing is carried out on
modeled rock joints of the asperity 15
15
on the spe-
cially designed direct shear testing machine by Rao et al.,
(2009a). This is capable of conducting tests on large prismatic
specimens through friction free rigid platens under bound-
ary conditions having different normal stiffness. Tests were
831
Figure 1. (a) Photograph of large scale direct shear apparatus.
(b) Schematic diagram of large scale direct shear apparatus.
conducted on normal stiffness 0, 8, 16 and 32 kN per mm.
The boundary normal stiffness, shearing rate and stress/strain
controlled mode can be selected and feed before the test of
the specimen in the computer according to the simulated field
condition.
2 SHEAR BEHAVIOUR UNDER DIFFERENT NORMAL
STIFFNESS
An automated servo controlled large scale direct shear test-
ing machine on rock consists of three main units such as
loading unit, hydraulic power pack with servo valve and data
acquisition and controlling unit as shown in Figures 1a, b.
In this apparatus the normal and shear loads are applied
Figure 2. Working of electro hydraulic servo valve with controller.
through an electro hydraulic servo actuator unit of maximum
capacity 500 kN and 1000 kN respectively with the load accu-
racy 0.5%of full load capacity, which works on closed loop
principle.
The displacements are measured by LVDTs mounted on
the specimen. Four LVDTs are used to measure the nor-
mal displacement and provide a check on specimen rotation
about an axis parallel to the shear zone and perpendicular to
the shearing direction. Degree of joint closure and dilation
angle can also be obtained from these measurements. Two
LVDTs are used to measure the shear displacement. These
displacement devices have adequate ranges of travel to accom-
modate the displacements, 20 mm. Sensitivities of these
devices are 0.001 mmfor both normal displacement and shear
displacement.
The data acquisition systemhas 16 channels, 2 channels for
load cell, 6 channels for LVDTs and remaining 8 channels are
free for additional input. The data acquisition system converts
the mechanical and electrical signals in to the digital data. The
output of signal is connected to CPU via cord. The load and
deformation values are stored at desired intervals as note pad
data. Suitable software is developed to process and plot the
test data.
The CNS conditions are reproduced by an electro hydraulic
servo-valve which applies the programmed force to the test
specimen (Fig. 2). The programmed force keeps changing
depending upon the stiffness of the surrounding rock joint
entered as an input data in the specially designed software
and the dilation and horizontal displacement data collected
through sixteen channel data acquisition system.
The increased load during the progress of testing is calcu-
lated by the following equation:
where,
P
n(t+t)
=Normal stress at any time interval t+t
P
n(t)
=Normal stress at any time interval t
K
n
=Stiffness of the surrounding rock mass
Y=Dilation resisted by the surrounding rock mass
832
Figure 3. Photograph of sample with asperity angle 15
15
.
At any time t +t the increased load is calculated from
equation 1, updated in the software and applied to the sample.
The normal stiffness under which shearing takes place can
easily be obtained by changing the normal stiffness in the
input data of direct shear software.
3 LABORATORYTESTING OF ROCK JOINT
It is difficult to conduct direct shear test on natural rock mass
because of difficulty in repeatability of the sample. To over-
come this, physical model of rock sample with different joint
asperities were prepared in plaster of Paris. Plaster of Paris is
selected because of its universal availability, ability to mould
into any shape when mix with water and easy to produce the
desired asperity. The basic properties of the model material at
60% of the moisture by weight and 14 days air curing is deter-
mined by performing the test on 38 mm diameter and 76 mm
height sample. The average uniaxial compressive strength and
tangent modulus, E
t50
of the air cured samples are 11.75 MPa
and 2281 MPa respectively. Based on Deere-Miller (1966)
classification the rock model is classified as EL category.
Suitable steel plates of angles 15
15
15
15
15
0
asperity joint under all normal
Figure 4. Shear behavior of 15
15
30
asperity.
Figure 7 shows the failure mechanism under different nor-
mal stiffness, for which change in shear stress with normal
stress is plotted. The test results indicate that at low initial
normal stress the peak shear stress is achieved at some nor-
mal stress and then the increase in the normal stress does not
cause much change in the shear stress. But with increasing ini-
tial normal stress the shear stress of the joint decreases rapidly
after attaining the peak shear stress with the increase in nor-
mal stress. But for all the cases shear strength of the joint
increases with increase in the normal stress. It means at low
initial normal stress, stress paths well prorogates along the
strength envelope but with increase in initial normal stress,
stress path do not propagate along the strength envelop, it just
Figure 8. Failure mechanism for K=0 kN per mm.
reaches a peak and then shear stress drops. The above phenom-
ena is observed for all the normal stiffness conditions except
K=0, where as for K=0, the shear stress is increasing under
constant normal stress and reaches the peak value. After that
shear stress remain constant as shown in Figure 8.
4 CONCLUSIONS
Several tests are performed on the modeled rock sample with
asperity 15
15
0
at K=0, 8, 16 and 32 kN per mm to study
the influence of normal stiffness on the shear behavior. The
conclusions made fromthe test results are summarized below:
i. Increase in the normal stiffness increases the normal
stresses on the shearing plane during the shearing pro-
cess and hence increase in the peak shear stress for the
same initial normal stress.
ii. Curvilinear strength variation is observed for all the nor-
mal stiffness conditions with a break in the curvature
between Pi =0.05
c
to 0.1
c
. The change in the slope
of the strength envelop indicates that the complete shear-
ing of the asperity at that normal stress and sliding of
samples takes place after that normal stress.
iii. At K=0boundaryconditionnormal stress is constant dur-
ing the shearing process where as it is varying for K=8,
16 and 32 kN per mm boundary conditions and the vari-
ation of normal stress exactly follows the shape of the
asperity, which is in present case a isosceles triangle with
angle 15