You are on page 1of 88

1041 WEST BRI DGE STREET PHOENI XVI LLE, PA 19460, USA Tel: 610-415-0412 FAX: 610-415-0413

Repor t
No. C-120710-001




TORSI ONAL SYSTEM DYNAMI C ANALYSI S

OF AN

WEG 300 HP I NDUCTI ON MOTOR W. VFD

COUPLED TO AN

ARI EL JGQ/ 2 COMPRESSOR

FOR THE

DYPROTEC PROJECT






Prepared f or

ANGI Energy Syst ems, LLC.
15 Pl umb St reet
Mi l t on, WI 53563




Prepared by

Charl es W. Yei ser




December 7, 2010
RBTS
Inc. ROTOR BEARING TECHNOLOGY & SOFTWARE, INC.
RBTS
Inc. ROTOR BEARING TECHNOLOGY & SOFTWARE, INC.
TERMS AND CONDI TI ONS


Consul t i ng servi ces are of f ered on a best ef f ort basi s; resul t s, opi ni ons and
recommendat i ons are drawn based upon i nf ormat i on and anal ysi s bel i eved t o
be correct and appl i cabl e. Nevert hel ess, no warrant y or guarant ee i s
expressed or i mpl i ed.









































i i
TABLE OF CONTENTS




Sect i on Ti t l e Page



1. I NTRODUCTI ON . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-1


2. SUMMARY, CONCLUSI ONS AND RECOMMENDATI ONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-1

2.1 SUMMARY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-1

2. 2 CONCLUSI ONS AND RECOMMENDATI ONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-6



3. TORSI ONAL VI BRATI ON ANALYSI S . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-1

3. 1 I NTRODUCTI ON . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-1

3. 2 TORSI ONAL NATURAL FREQUENCY AND MODE SHAPES . 3-2

3. 3 STEADY-STATE TORSI ONAL RESPONSE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-4



APPENDI CES

Appendi x A St ress/ Fat i gue Anal ysi s
Appendi x B Ref erenced Engi neeri ng Mat eri al s













i i i
1-1
1. I NTRODUCTI ON


A t orsi onal vi brat i on anal ysi s of a mot or-dri ven JGQ/ 2 compressor dri ve
t rai n was perf ormed by RBTS f or t he Dyprot ec proj ect . The dri ve t rai n
t echni cal i nf ormat i on was suppl i ed by ANGI Energy Syst ems, LLC. (ANGI )
duri ng t he mont hs of November and December 2010. Addi t i onal coupl i ng
and compressor mass-el ast i c and t orque-ef f ort dat a were recei ved f rom
t he respect i ve manuf act urers duri ng t hi s t i me peri od.

The compressor dri ve t rai n i s envi si oned t o provi de l oaded operat i on over
a range of speeds f rom 900 t o 1800 rpm. The anal yzed t rai n
conf i gurat i on consi st s of a VFD cont rol l ed 300 HP WEG i nduct i on mot or
(Frame 586/ 7T) t hat i s connect ed t o an Ari el JGQ/ 2 compressor
(AP020713). Thi s t orsi onal vi brat i on st udy i ncl uded t he sel ect i on of a
sui t abl e coupl i ng, as wel l as possi bl y a compressor-mount ed f l ywheel
assembl y and ot her hardware modi f i cat i ons, t o provi de accept abl e dri ve
t rai n t orsi onal perf ormance. Af t er several prel i mi nary cal cul at i ons, a
cust omi zed T. B. Woods HSH 42 f l exi bl e di sc coupl i ng was sel ect ed f or
t hi s appl i cat i on. The anal yt i cal t orsi onal vi brat i on st udy f or t he above
mot or-dri ven, reci procat i ng compressor appl i cat i on are present ed i n t hi s
report .

The anal yses cont ai ned i n t hi s report were carri ed out t o det ermi ne t he
dri ve t rai n t orsi onal nat ural f requenci es, mode shapes of vi brat i on, and
t orsi onal response (t orques/ st resses and angul ar mot i ons) under vari ous
reci procat i ng compressor l oad condi t i ons. The response dat a were
ut i l i zed t o eval uat e t he t orsi onal f at i gue f act ors of saf et y of vari ous
el ement s al ong t he dri ve t rai n, as wel l as t o assess t he manuf act urer' s
t orsi onal vi brat i on l i mi t s. Compressor perf ormance charact eri st i cs
ut i l i zed i n t he anal ysi s were suppl i ed by t he compressor manuf act urer
(Ari el ) and are i ncl uded i n Appendi x B of t hi s report .

A f l exi bl e di sc coupl i ng was sel ect ed f or t hi s reci procat i ng compressor
appl i cat i on t o obt ai n accept abl e margi ns of avoi dance wi t h promi nent
mechani cal and el ect ri cal t orsi onal exci t at i ons and t he f requency of t he
t rai n' s f undament al t orsi onal t wi st mode of vi brat i on over i t s operat i ng
speed range. To f ul l y quant i f y t he dri ve t rai n' s dynami c behavi or, t he
mot or and compressor' s t orque-ef f ort perf ormance dat a was used t o
generat e t orsi onal response over t he requi red anal yt i cal operat i ng speed
range of 900 1800 rpm. The response dat a was ut i l i zed i n conj unct i on
wi t h an advanced t orsi onal st ress/ f at i gue anal ysi s, as wel l as ot her
manuf act urer perf ormance l i mi t s, t o conf i rm t hat t he dynami c shaf t
t orques and t orsi onal vi brat i ons were wi t hi n accept abl e l evel s t hroughout
t he dri ve t rai n.

1-2
Thi s report document s t he t orsi onal vi brat i on anal yses perf ormed f or t he
Dyprot ec JGQ/ 2 compressor dri ve t rai n, havi ng a cust omi zed T. B. Woods
HSH 42 coupl i ng. Sect i on 2 present s a syst em perf ormance summary,
concl usi ons, and recommendat i ons. Sect i on 3 present s a det ai l ed
descri pt i on of t he t orsi onal vi brat i on anal yses.
2-1
2. SUMMARY CONCLUSI ONS AND RECOMMENDATI ONS


A f i ni t e-el ement based t orsi onal vi brat i on anal ysi s of t he proposed
Dyprot ec proj ect JGQ/ 2 dri ve t rai n, havi ng a f l exi bl e di sc coupl i ng,
i dent i f i ed several harmoni c i nt erf erences (t orsi onal resonances) wi t h t he
dri ve t rai n' s t orsi onal t wi st modes of vi brat i on wi t hi n t he compressor' s
anal yt i cal desi gn operat i ng speed range of 900 1800 rpm.

Two compressor perf ormance condi t i ons were anal yzed t o eval uat e t he
t rai n' s st eady-st at e dynami c t orsi onal response over a range of speeds
bet ween 900 1800 rpm. The resul t i ng t orque dat a were subsequent l y
ut i l i zed i n an advanced st ress/ f at i gue anal ysi s t o quant i f y t he robust ness
of t he cri t i cal dri ve t rai n el ement s. As requi red, vari ous ot her si mul at ed
vi brat i on dat a were al so compared agai nst t he manuf act urers' and/ or end-
user' s perf ormance requi rement s. A summary of t he anal ysi s resul t s,
concl usi ons and recommendat i ons f ol l ow.

2. 1 SUMMARY

A schemat i c represent at i on of t he dri ve t rai n mat hemat i cal model i s
present ed i n Fi gure 2-1. A det ai l ed descri pt i on of t hi s model i s
cont ai ned i n Sect i on 3.

The comput ed dri ve t rai n t orsi onal nat ural f requenci es are present ed i n
Tabl e 2-1. The l owest "f undament al " t orsi onal t wi st nat ural f requency
(Mode # 1) of t he syst em i s 14, 162 mi n
- 1
(cpm) whi ch pl aces t hi s
f requency bet ween t he 7
t h
and 8
t h
orders of t he maxi mum operat i ng
speed (i . e. 7. 87 t i mes t he maxi mum speed of 1800 rpm).

Fi gure 2-2 present s t he Campbel l Di agram (Cri t i cal Speed Map) f or t he
model ed dri ve t rai n. Thi s di agram provi des a graphi cal present at i on of
t he t orsi onal nat ural f requenci es (hori zont al l i nes) al ong wi t h mul t i pl es
of t he dri ve speed t o expedi t i ousl y i dent i f y i nt erf erences (i nt ersect i ons)
wi t h harmoni c exci t at i ons (t ypi cal l y bet ween 1
st
t hrough t o 12
t h
orders).
Thi s map present s i nt erf erences wi t h t he f i rst t wo modes of vi brat i on
(Modes #1 & #2) f or t he model ed dri ve t rai n. The cri t i cal speed map
has been annot at ed wi t h an "X" at each i nt erf erence poi nt . Ref erri ng
t o t hi s f i gure, t here are harmoni c i nt erf erences (t orsi onal resonances)
wi t h Mode #1 and t he 8
t h
12
t h
mul t i pl es of t he runni ng speed wi t hi n
t he 900 1800 rpm speed range.
2-2
The f i rst and second mul t i pl es of t he mot or el ect ri cal suppl y l i ne
f requency (30 - 60Hz) i s wel l bel ow t hi s t rai n' s f undament al nat ural
f requency.

Fi gure 2-3 present s t he f undament al t orsi onal t wi st mode shape of t he
dri ve t rai n (Mode # 1). Typi cal l y, f or di rect -dri ve mot or/ compressor
syst ems, t hi s mode of vi brat i on i s responsi bl e f or t he maj ori t y of t he
dynami c ampl i f i cat i on of t he dri ve t rai n t orques and, as such, i s t he
"mode of concern" f or t hi s arrangement of equi pment . I t s f requency
(14, 162 cpm) i s bet ween t he 7
t h
and 8
t h
orders of t he maxi mum runni ng
speed. An exami nat i on of t hi s mode shape reveal s t hat t he maxi mum
t orsi onal st rai n, as i dent i f i ed by i ts node (l ocat i on where i t crosses t he
shaf t cent erl i ne), i s l i kel y t o occur i n t he mot or dri ve shaf t . Si mi l arl y,
an eval uat i on of Mode #2, (Fi gure 2-4) demonst rat es t hat t he maxi mum
vi brat ory t orque l evel s owi ng t o t hi s mode of vi brat i on i s l i kel y t o occur
i n t he mot or dri ve shaf t , as wel l as i n t he compressor crankshaf t .

Torsi onal response anal yses were perf ormed t o cal cul at e t he dynami c
t orques al ong t he dri ve t rai n, resul t i ng f rom t he i nput (mot or) and l oad
(compressor) t orques, usi ng a non-synchronous st eady-st at e response
anal ysi s. Thi s t ype of anal ysi s consi ders t he compressor t orque as
def i ned by one compl et e cycl e (crank revol ut i on). Accordi ngl y, t he
manuf act urer-suppl i ed t orque ef f ort curves and appropri at e phase
rel at i onshi ps f or each t hrow i n t he compressor are i ncl uded as part of
t he si mul at i on. Thus, t hi s anal ysi s met hod capt ures t he exact l oadi ng
pat t ern at each t hrow l ocat i on t o comput e t he exact syst em response
at vari ous l ocat i ons al ong t he dri ve t rai n.

Two JGQ/ 2 compressor perf ormance condi t i ons were anal yzed t o
def i ne i t s gas compressi on operat i on over a range of speeds bet ween
900 1800 rpm. The compressor perf ormance condi t i ons ut i l i zed i n
t he t orsi onal response anal ysi s are summari zed i n Tabl e 2-3. The
manuf act urer-suppl i ed compressor t orque-ef f ort and operat i onal dat a
are cont ai ned i n Appendi x B of t hi s report .
2-3
Torsi onal Response wi t h Loaded Compressor Perf ormance

Torsi onal f orced response cal cul at i ons were perf ormed f or t he sel ect ed
desi gn poi nt compressor l oadi ng condi t i ons f or t he JGQ/ 2 compressor
(Load Cases #1 & #2). To eval uat e t he i nf l uence of nearby resonances
at t he ext remes of t he speed envel ope, t he st eady-st at e dynami c
response associ at ed wi t h t hi s compressor perf ormance condi t i on was
eval uat ed over an expanded range of speeds bet ween 600 2100 rpm.

Accept abl e t orsi onal response was det ermi ned by t he f ol l owi ng cri t eri a:

1. Mot or
Maxi mum dri ve shaf t vi brat ory t orque l i mi t of 91, 870 i n-l bf
( 1)

Maxi mum mot or core speed osci l l at i on l i mi t of 2 3%
( 2)


2. Compressor
Maxi mum dri ve st ub vi brat ory t orque l i mi t of 20, 630 i n-l bf
( 1)

Maxi mum crankshaf t vi brat ory t orque l i mi t of 28, 400 i n-l bf
( 1)


3. Coupl i ng
Maxi mum vi brat ory t orque l i mi t of 38, 220 i n-l bf
( 3)




1. Maxi mum vi brat ory t orque l i mi t corresponds t o a t orsi onal shaf t
f at i gue f act or of saf et y of 1. 5 under rat ed l oad t orque condi t i ons of
10, 420 i n-l bf (see Appendi x A f or f at i gue cal cul at i ons).

2. Common i ndust ry l i mi t .

3. Manuf act urer' s vi brat ory t orque l i mi t at t he mot or' s rat ed t orque of
10, 420 i n-l bf and a coupl i ng rat i ng of 73, 000 i n-l bf see Appendi x B f or
f urt her det ai l s.

2-4
Owi ng t o t he subst ant i al quant i t y of dat a generat ed by t he response
anal yses, a represent at i ve sampl e of t he t orsi onal response resul t s
have been sel ect ed f or present at i on i n mai n body of t hi s report .
However, t he f ul l compl ement of t he t orsi onal resul t s i s provi ded i n t he
f orm of summary t abl es f or al l of t he eval uat ed perf ormance
condi t i ons.

The si mul at ed t orsi onal response f or t he dri ve t rai n was det ermi ned t o
be accept abl e over a range of operat i ng speeds bet ween 900 1800
rpm. The si mul at ed t orsi onal response was f ai rl y si mi l ar f or al l cases
consi dered. For ref erence, a di scussi on of t he t orsi onal response
resul t s correspondi ng t o a maxi mum HP condi t i on i s present ed herei n.

Load Case #1 Resul t s

Fi gure 2-5 present s t he appl i ed t orques at each of t he compressor
t hrows, as wel l as t hei r t ot al , as a f unct i on of crank angl e f or t he
compressor perf ormance condi t i on correspondi ng t o Load Case #1.
Fi gure 2-6 present s t he t rai n' s t orsi onal response (combi ned order
vi brat ory t orque ampl i t udes) as a f unct i on of speed at vari ous l ocat i ons
on t he mot or shaf t and coupl i ng under t he compressor perf ormance
condi t i ons correspondi ng t o t hi s l oad case. Despi t e t he presence of
several t orsi onal resonances, t here i s l i t t l e, or no, dynami c
ampl i f i cat i on of t he vi brat ory t orque wi t hi n t he operat i ng speed range.
The i ncreases i n dynami c t orque l evel s at speeds around 2025, 1770,
1575, 1415, and 1290 rpm are t he resul t of t orsi onal resonances
bet ween t he f i rst t orsi onal t wi st mode of vi brat i on and t he 7x 11x
harmoni c orders of compressor t orque, respect i vel y. The si mul at ed
mot or shaf t and coupl i ng response l evel s are wi t hi n t he gui del i nes f or
accept abl e t orsi onal perf ormance.

Fi gure 2-7 present s si mi l ar dat a f or t he compressor crankshaf t
el ement s. Ref erri ng t o t hi s dat a, despi t e t he presence of several
t orsi onal resonances, t here are rel at i vel y smal l dynami c ampl i f i cat i ons
of t he vi brat ory t orque wi t hi n t he operat i ng speed range. Si mi l ar t o t he
previ ous dat a, t he i ncreases i n dynami c t orque l evel s at speeds around
2025, 1770, 1575, 1415, and 1290 rpm are t he resul t of t orsi onal
resonances bet ween t he f i rst t orsi onal t wi st mode of vi brat i on and t he
7x 11x harmoni c orders of compressor t orque, respect i vel y. The
predi ct ed l evel s of vi brat ory t orque i n t he compressor crankshaf t are
wi t hi n t he gui del i nes f or accept abl e t orsi onal perf ormance over t he
ent i re speed range.
2-5
Fi gure 2-8 present s t he compressor auxi l i ary dri ve mot i ons i n t erms of
t he si ngl e order harmoni c ampl i t udes. Si mi l ar t o t he previ ous t orque
dat a, t he af orement i oned resonances are apparent i n t he response
resul t s. Al so, t he not abl e i ncreases i n t he 1x and 2x osci l l at i on
ampl i t ude l evel s at t he l ower speeds are t he resul t of non-resonant
behavi or t hat occurs as a consequence of sl owi ng t he syst em down
t he 1x and 2x component s of t orque produce hi gher angul ar
di spl acement s as t he speed decreases. The si mul at i on resul t s are
wi t hi n accept abl e l evel s over t he operat i ng speed range.

Fi nal l y, Fi gure 2-9 present s t he mot or core t orsi onal osci l l at i on resul t s
i n t erms of t hei r combi ned order ampl i t udes. Si mi l ar t o t he previ ous
t orque dat a, t he not abl e i ncrease i n t he osci l l at i on ampl i t ude l evel at
t he l ower speeds i s t he resul t of non-resonant behavi or t hat occurs as
a consequence of sl owi ng t he syst em down t he 1x and 2x
component s of t orque produce hi gher angul ar di spl acement s as t he
speed decreases. Wi t hi n t he vi ci ni t y of each operat i ng poi nt , t he
si mul at i on resul t s are wi t hi n accept abl e l evel s.

The f ul l compl ement of t he t orsi onal response resul t s f or t he sel ect ed
compressor perf ormance (Load Cases #1 & #2) i s summari zed i n Tabl e
2-4.

2-6
2. 2 CONCLUSI ONS AND RECOMMENDATI ONS



1. Based on t he anal ysi s perf ormed and present ed i n t hi s report , t he
si mul at ed t orsi onal vi brat i ons i n t he JGQ/ 2 compressor dri ve t rai n are
accept abl e over a range of speeds bet ween 900 1800 rpm.


The sel ect ed coupl i ng t o connect t he mot or dri ver t o t he compressor
i s a cust omi zed T. B. Woods HSH 42 (machi ned st eel spacer ). The
mot or and compressor-si de coupl i ng hubs must be f abri cat ed f rom
st eel and be bored f or keyl ess shaf t i nt erf erence f i t s. The
compressor si de hub must be short ened t o mat ch t he avai l abl e l engt h
on t he compressor dri ve st ub shaf t . Ref er t o Appendi x B f or more
coupl i ng i nf ormat i on.


2. The st ress/ f at i gue anal ysi s i ndi cat es accept abl e l evel s of t orsi onal
shaf t st ress i n t he ent i re dri ve t rai n wi t hi n t he af orement i oned
recommended operat i ng speed range.

3. The VFD vendor shoul d be consul t ed t o conf i rm t hat t hei r equi pment
wi l l not cause any t orque pul sat i ons i n t he el ect ri c mot or dri ver.

4. Any modi f i cat i ons t o t he JGQ/ 2 compressor set up/ perf ormance whi ch
woul d si gni f i cant l y i nf l uence t he harmoni c cont ent of i t s crank-ef f ort
charact eri st i cs (For exampl e: changi ng cyl i nder si zes,
unl oadi ng/ di sabl i ng t hrows, rest agi ng, et c. ) shoul d be eval uat ed vi a
t orsi onal anal yses t o ensure t hat t he resul t i ng dynami c t orques are
wi t hi n accept abl e l evel s.

5. Any modi f i cat i ons t o t he compressor dri ve t rai n whi ch woul d
si gni f i cant l y i nf l uence i t s t orsi onal dynami c charact eri st i cs (For
exampl e: changi ng mot ors, coupl i ngs, f l ywheel s, et c. ) shoul d be
eval uat ed vi a t orsi onal anal yses t o ensure t hat t he resul t i ng dynami c
t orque l evel s are wi t hi n accept abl e l evel s.

6. I t i s recommended t hat t he t orsi onal response dat a present ed i n t hi s
report be shared wi t h t he vari ous component manuf act urers (mot or,
coupl i ng, compressor, and VFD) so t hat t hey are aware of t he
predi ct ed l evel s of t orsi onal response t hat t hei r component s are
ant i ci pat ed t o experi ence.
2-7















































Fi gur e 2-1
Throw #1
W
E
G

3
0
0

H
P

M
o
t
o
r
A
r
i
e
l

J
G
Q
/
2

C
o
m
p
r
e
s
s
o
r
T
.
B
.

W
o
o
d
s
H
S
H

4
2

C
o
u
p
l
i
n
g
Throw #2
Motor Core
Aux Drive
2-8
Tabl e 2-1


Torsi onal Natural Frequency Anal ysi s

ANGI Dyprot ec Proj ect 07-Dec-2010
WEG 300 HP Mot or T. B. Woods HSH 42 Coupl i ng
Ari el JGQ/ 2 Compressor


Torsional Twist Natural Frequency
Mode Number (Min
-1
or CPM)
1 14,162
2 25,959
3 29,303
4 46,952
5 49,370
6 69,095
7 75,801
8 94,941
9 140,735
10 150,923
11 204,628
12 224,375
13 298,626
14 396,649
15 448,342
16 455,843
17 497,640
18 572,354
19 578,928
20 602,884
21 737,465
22 860,959
23 967,978
24 1,120,713
25 1,175,124
26 2,071,551
27 2,520,705
2-9















































Fi gur e 2-2
A
N
G
I

-

D
Y
P
R
O
T
E
C

P
R
O
J
E
C
T

-

A
R
I
E
L

J
G
Q
/
2

C
O
M
P
R
E
S
S
O
R
T
O
R
S
I
O
N
A
L

C
R
I
T
I
C
A
L

S
P
E
E
D

M
A
P

(
C
A
M
P
B
E
L
L

D
I
A
G
R
A
M
)
R
o
t
a
t
i
o
n
a
l

S
p
e
e
d

(
R
P
M
)
6
0
0
7
0
0
8
0
0
9
0
0
1
,
0
0
0
1
,
1
0
0
1
,
2
0
0
1
,
3
0
0
1
,
4
0
0
1
,
5
0
0
1
,
6
0
0
1
,
7
0
0
1
,
8
0
0
1
,
9
0
0
2
,
0
0
0
2
,
1
0
0
0
.
0
0
0
0
.
2
0
0
0
.
4
0
0
0
.
6
0
0
0
.
8
0
0
1
.
0
0
0
1
.
2
0
0
1
.
4
0
0
1
.
6
0
0
1
.
8
0
0
2
.
0
0
0
2
.
2
0
0
2
.
4
0
0
2
.
6
0
0
2
.
8
0
0
3
.
0
0
0
3
.
2
0
0
3
.
4
0
0
3
.
6
0
0
M
o
d
e

#
1

@

1
4
,
1
6
2

c
p
m
M
o
d
e

#
2

@

2
5
,
9
5
9

c
p
m
1
x

M
e
c
h
a
n
i
c
a
l
2
x
3
x
4
x
5
x
6
x
7
x
8
x
9
x
1
0
x
1
1
x
1
2
x
M
i
n

S
p
e
e
d
M
a
x

S
p
e
e
d
-

I
n
t
e
r
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
M
o
d
e

#
1

@

1
4
,
1
6
2

c
p
m
M
o
d
e

#
2

@

2
5
,
9
5
9

c
p
m
1
x

M
e
c
h
a
n
i
c
a
l
2
x
3
x
4
x
5
x
6
x
7
x
8
x
9
x
1
0
x
1
1
x
1
2
x
M
i
n

S
p
e
e
d
M
a
x

S
p
e
e
d
-

I
n
t
e
r
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
X
X
X
X
X
X
2-10















































Fi gur e 2-3
F
i
r
s
t

T
o
r
s
i
o
n
a
l

T
w
i
s
t

M
o
d
e

o
f

V
i
b
r
a
t
i
o
n
2-11















































Fi gur e 2-4
S
e
c
o
n
d

T
o
r
s
i
o
n
a
l

T
w
i
s
t

M
o
d
e

o
f

V
i
b
r
a
t
i
o
n
2-12
Tabl e 2-2


Torsi onal Forced Response Anal ysi s

ANGI Dyprot ec Proj ect 07-Dec-2010
WEG 300 HP Mot or T. B. Woods HSH 42 Coupl i ng
Ari el JGQ/ 2 Compressor











Load Compressor
Case Speed Power Description of Compressor
Number (rpm) HP Performance
Stage #1 - (1) 5-1/8" JGU Cylinder
Stage #2 - (1) 3-5/8" JG Cylinder
1 1750 264
PS/PD = 349.92/1324.92 psig, Flow = 3.179 MMSCFD
Stage #1 - Throw #1 is Double-Acting (HEVPKT = 100%)
Stage #2 - Throw #2 is Double-Acting (No Pkt)
2 1750 192
PS/PD = 199.92/1324.92 psig, Flow = 1.573 MMSCFD
Stage #1 - Throw #1 is Double-Acting (HEVPKT = 100%)
Stage #2 - Throw #2 is Double-Acting (No Pkt)
Two-Stage Operation
2-13













































Load Case #1 Compr essor Tor que-Ef f or t

Fi gur e 2-5
A
N
G
I

-

D
Y
P
R
O
T
E
C

P
R
O
J
E
C
T

-

A
R
I
E
L

J
G
P
/
2

C
O
M
P
R
E
S
S
O
R

-

C
O
M
P
R
E
S
S
O
R

T
O
R
Q
U
E
-
E
F
F
O
R
T

P
E
R
F
O
R
M
A
N
C
E
L
O
A
D

C
A
S
E

#
0
1

-

T
W
O
-
S
T
A
G
E

-

2
6
4

H
P

@

1
7
5
0

R
P
M

-

P
S
/
P
D

=

3
4
9
.
9
2
/
1
3
2
4
.
9
2

P
S
I
G
,

F
L
O
W

=

3
.
1
7
9

M
M
S
C
F
D

-

B
O
T
H

T
H
R
O
W
S

A
R
E

D
O
U
B
L
E
-
A
C
T
I
N
G
C
r
a
n
k

A
n
g
l
e

(
d
e
g
)
0
2
0
4
0
6
0
8
0
1
0
0
1
2
0
1
4
0
1
6
0
1
8
0
2
0
0
2
2
0
2
4
0
2
6
0
2
8
0
3
0
0
3
2
0
3
4
0
3
6
0
-
1
.
0
0
0
-
0
.
8
0
0
-
0
.
6
0
0
-
0
.
4
0
0
-
0
.
2
0
0
0
.
0
0
0
0
.
2
0
0
0
.
4
0
0
0
.
6
0
0
0
.
8
0
0
1
.
0
0
0
1
.
2
0
0
1
.
4
0
0
1
.
6
0
0
1
.
8
0
0
2
.
0
0
0
2
.
2
0
0
2
.
4
0
0
2
.
6
0
0
2
.
8
0
0
3
.
0
0
0
3
.
2
0
0
3
.
4
0
0
3
.
6
0
0
3
.
8
0
0
J
G
Q
/
2

T
o
t
a
l

T
o
r
q
u
e
J
G
Q
/
2

T
h
r
o
w

#
1
J
G
Q
/
2

T
h
r
o
w

#
2
2-14













































Load Case #1 Mot or and Coupl i ng Dynami c Tor ques

Fi gur e 2-6
A
N
G
I

-

D
Y
P
R
O
T
E
C

P
R
O
J
E
C
T

-

A
R
I
E
L

J
G
Q
/
2

C
O
M
P
R
E
S
S
O
R

-

M
O
T
O
R

S
H
A
F
T

A
N
D

D
R
I
V
E

C
O
U
P
L
I
N
G

V
I
B
R
A
T
O
R
Y

T
O
R
Q
U
E
S
L
O
A
D

C
A
S
E

#
0
1

-

T
W
O
-
S
T
A
G
E

-

2
6
4

H
P

@

1
7
5
0

R
P
M

-

P
S
/
P
D

=

3
4
9
.
9
2
/
1
3
2
4
.
9
2

P
S
I
G
,

F
L
O
W

=

3
.
1
7
9

M
M
S
C
F
D

-

B
O
T
H

T
H
R
O
W
S

A
R
E

D
O
U
B
L
E
-
A
C
T
I
N
G
S
p
e
e
d

(
R
P
M
)
6
0
0
7
0
0
8
0
0
9
0
0
1
,
0
0
0
1
,
1
0
0
1
,
2
0
0
1
,
3
0
0
1
,
4
0
0
1
,
5
0
0
1
,
6
0
0
1
,
7
0
0
1
,
8
0
0
1
,
9
0
0
2
,
0
0
0
2
,
1
0
0
0
.
0
0
0
0
.
4
0
0
0
.
8
0
0
1
.
2
0
0
1
.
6
0
0
2
.
0
0
0
2
.
4
0
0
2
.
8
0
0
3
.
2
0
0
3
.
6
0
0
4
.
0
0
0
4
.
4
0
0
4
.
8
0
0
5
.
2
0
0
5
.
6
0
0
6
.
0
0
0
6
.
4
0
0
6
.
8
0
0
7
.
2
0
0
7
.
6
0
0
8
.
0
0
0
M
o
t
o
r

C
o
r
e

-

E
l
#
1
3
M
o
t
o
r

S
h
a
f
t

-

E
l
#
1
6
M
o
t
o
r

S
h
a
f
t

-

E
l
#
1
7
M
o
t
o
r

S
h
a
f
t

@

D
E

B
r
g

-

E
l
#
1
8
M
o
t
o
r

S
h
a
f
t

D
r
i
v
e

E
n
d

-

E
l
#
2
0
D
r
i
v
e

C
o
u
p
l
i
n
g

-

E
l
#
2
1
M
i
n
.

S
p
e
e
d
M
a
x
.

S
p
e
e
d
M
o
t
o
r

S
h
a
f
t

(
L
i
m
i
t

=

+
/
-

9
1
,
8
7
0

i
n
-
l
b
f
)
D
r
i
v
e

C
o
u
p
l
i
n
g
M
i
n
.

S
p
e
e
d
M
a
x
.

S
p
e
e
d
M
o
t
o
r

S
h
a
f
t

(
L
i
m
i
t

=

+
/
-

9
1
,
8
7
0

i
n
-
l
b
f
)
D
r
i
v
e

C
o
u
p
l
i
n
g
2-15













































Load Case #1 Compr essor Cr ankshaf t Dynami c Tor ques

Fi gur e 2-7
A
N
G
I

-

D
Y
P
R
O
T
E
C

P
R
O
J
E
C
T

-

A
R
I
E
L

J
G
Q
/
2

C
O
M
P
R
E
S
S
O
R

-

C
O
M
P
R
E
S
S
O
R

C
R
A
N
K
S
H
A
F
T

V
I
B
R
A
T
O
R
Y

T
O
R
Q
U
E
S
L
O
A
D

C
A
S
E

#
0
1

-

T
W
O
-
S
T
A
G
E

-

2
6
4

H
P

@

1
7
5
0

R
P
M

-

P
S
/
P
D

=

3
4
9
.
9
2
/
1
3
2
4
.
9
2

P
S
I
G
,

F
L
O
W

=

3
.
1
7
9

M
M
S
C
F
D

-

B
O
T
H

T
H
R
O
W
S

A
R
E

D
O
U
B
L
E
-
A
C
T
I
N
G
S
p
e
e
d

(
R
P
M
)
6
0
0
7
0
0
8
0
0
9
0
0
1
,
0
0
0
1
,
1
0
0
1
,
2
0
0
1
,
3
0
0
1
,
4
0
0
1
,
5
0
0
1
,
6
0
0
1
,
7
0
0
1
,
8
0
0
1
,
9
0
0
2
,
0
0
0
2
,
1
0
0
0
.
0
0
0
0
.
4
0
0
0
.
8
0
0
1
.
2
0
0
1
.
6
0
0
2
.
0
0
0
2
.
4
0
0
2
.
8
0
0
3
.
2
0
0
3
.
6
0
0
4
.
0
0
0
4
.
4
0
0
4
.
8
0
0
5
.
2
0
0
5
.
6
0
0
6
.
0
0
0
6
.
4
0
0
6
.
8
0
0
7
.
2
0
0
7
.
6
0
0
8
.
0
0
0
J
G
Q
/
2

D
r
i
v
e

S
t
u
b

-

E
l
#
2
2
J
G
Q
/
2

T
h
r
o
w
s

#
1
-
#
2

-

E
l
#
2
5
M
i
n
.

S
p
e
e
d
M
a
x
.

S
p
e
e
d
J
G
Q
/
2

D
r
i
v
e

S
t
u
b
J
G
Q
/
2

C
r
a
n
k
s
h
a
f
t
M
i
n
.

S
p
e
e
d
M
a
x
.

S
p
e
e
d
J
G
Q
/
2

D
r
i
v
e

S
t
u
b
J
G
Q
/
2

C
r
a
n
k
s
h
a
f
t
2-16













































Load Case #1 Compr essor Auxi l i ar y Dr i ve Osci l l at i ons

Fi gur e 2-8
A
N
G
I

-

D
Y
P
R
O
T
E
C

P
R
O
J
E
C
T

-

A
R
I
E
L

J
G
Q
/
2

C
O
M
P
R
E
S
S
O
R

-

C
O
M
P
R
E
S
S
O
R

A
U
X
I
L
I
A
R
Y

D
R
I
V
E

T
O
R
S
I
O
N
A
L

O
S
C
I
L
L
A
T
I
O
N
S
L
O
A
D

C
A
S
E

#
0
1

-

T
W
O
-
S
T
A
G
E

-

2
6
4

H
P

@

1
7
5
0

R
P
M

-

P
S
/
P
D

=

3
4
9
.
9
2
/
1
3
2
4
.
9
2

P
S
I
G
,

F
L
O
W

=

3
.
1
7
9

M
M
S
C
F
D

-

B
O
T
H

T
H
R
O
W
S

A
R
E

D
O
U
B
L
E
-
A
C
T
I
N
G
S
p
e
e
d

(
R
P
M
)
6
0
0
7
0
0
8
0
0
9
0
0
1
,
0
0
0
1
,
1
0
0
1
,
2
0
0
1
,
3
0
0
1
,
4
0
0
1
,
5
0
0
1
,
6
0
0
1
,
7
0
0
1
,
8
0
0
1
,
9
0
0
2
,
0
0
0
2
,
1
0
0
0
0
.
2
0
.
4
0
.
6
0
.
8 1
J
G
Q
/
2

A
u
x

D
r
i
v
e

-

S
t
#
2
8

H
n
=

1
.
0
0

(
d
)
J
G
Q
/
2

A
u
x

D
r
i
v
e

-

S
t
#
2
8

H
n
=

2
.
0
0

(
d
)
J
G
Q
/
2

A
u
x

D
r
i
v
e

-

S
t
#
2
8

H
n
=

3
.
0
0

(
d
)
J
G
Q
/
2

A
u
x

D
r
i
v
e

-

S
t
#
2
8

H
n
=

4
.
0
0

(
d
)
J
G
Q
/
2

A
u
x

D
r
i
v
e

-

S
t
#
2
8

H
n
=

5
.
0
0

(
d
)
J
G
Q
/
2

A
u
x

D
r
i
v
e

-

S
t
#
2
8

H
n
=

6
.
0
0

(
d
)
J
G
Q
/
2

A
u
x

D
r
i
v
e

-

S
t
#
2
8

H
n
=

7
.
0
0

(
d
)
J
G
Q
/
2

A
u
x

D
r
i
v
e

-

S
t
#
2
8

H
n
=

8
.
0
0

(
d
)
J
G
Q
/
2

A
u
x

D
r
i
v
e

-

S
t
#
2
8

H
n
=

9
.
0
0

(
d
)
J
G
Q
/
2

A
u
x

D
r
i
v
e

-

S
t
#
2
8

H
n
=
1
0
.
0
0

(
d
)
J
G
Q
/
2

A
u
x

D
r
i
v
e

-

S
t
#
2
8

H
n
=
1
1
.
0
0

(
d
)
J
G
Q
/
2

A
u
x

D
r
i
v
e

-

S
t
#
2
8

H
n
=
1
2
.
0
0

(
d
)
M
i
n
.

S
p
e
e
d
M
a
x
.

S
p
e
e
d
1
X

O
s
c
i
l
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
2
X

O
s
c
i
l
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
3
X

-

1
2
X

O
s
c
i
l
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
M
i
n
.

S
p
e
e
d
M
a
x
.

S
p
e
e
d
1
X

O
s
c
i
l
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
2
X

O
s
c
i
l
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
3
X

-

1
2
X

O
s
c
i
l
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
2-17













































Load Case #1 Mot or Cor e Osci l l at i ons

Fi gur e 2-9
A
N
G
I

-

D
Y
P
R
O
T
E
C

P
R
O
J
E
C
T

-

A
R
I
E
L

J
G
Q
/
2

C
O
M
P
R
E
S
S
O
R

-

M
O
T
O
R

C
O
R
E

T
O
R
S
I
O
N
A
L

O
S
C
I
L
L
A
T
I
O
N
S
L
O
A
D

C
A
S
E

#
0
1

-

T
W
O
-
S
T
A
G
E

-

2
6
4

H
P

@

1
7
5
0

R
P
M

-

P
S
/
P
D

=

3
4
9
.
9
2
/
1
3
2
4
.
9
2

P
S
I
G
,

F
L
O
W

=

3
.
1
7
9

M
M
S
C
F
D

-

B
O
T
H

T
H
R
O
W
S

A
R
E

D
O
U
B
L
E
-
A
C
T
I
N
G
S
p
e
e
d

(
R
P
M
)
6
0
0
7
0
0
8
0
0
9
0
0
1
,
0
0
0
1
,
1
0
0
1
,
2
0
0
1
,
3
0
0
1
,
4
0
0
1
,
5
0
0
1
,
6
0
0
1
,
7
0
0
1
,
8
0
0
1
,
9
0
0
2
,
0
0
0
2
,
1
0
0
0 2 4 6
M
o
t
o
r

C
o
r
e

-

S
t
#
1
3
(
v
)
M
i
n
.

S
p
e
e
d
M
a
x
.

S
p
e
e
d
M
o
t
o
r

C
o
r
e

(
2
%
)
M
o
t
o
r

C
o
r
e

(
3
%
)
M
i
n
.

S
p
e
e
d
M
a
x
.

S
p
e
e
d
M
o
t
o
r

C
o
r
e

(
2
%
)
M
o
t
o
r

C
o
r
e

(
3
%
)
2-18
Tabl e 2-4A


Torsi onal Forced Response Anal ysi s

ANGI Dyprot ec Proj ect 07-Dec-2010
WEG 300 HP Mot or T. B. Woods HSH 42 Coupl i ng
Ari el JGQ/ 2 Compressor











Motor Shaft
and Drive Coupling Maximum Torque Maximum Torque Maximum Torque Maximum Torque Maximum Torque Maximum Torque
Vibratory Torques Amplitude Amplitude Amplitude Amplitude Amplitude Amplitude
and Speed and Speed and Speed and Speed and Speed and Speed
Notes: 1. All values are maximum combined order torque amplitudes - Units of measure are in-lbf (0-peak)
Notes: 2. Motor drive shaft combined order torque amplitude limit = 91,870 in-lbf (Fatigue S.F. = 1.5)
Notes: 3. Coupling combined order torque amplitude limit = 38,220 in-lbf (OEM Limit)
- - -
@ 1769 rpm @ 1771 rpm - - - - - - - - - - - -
Motor Shaft Drive End - El#20
29,185 25,278 - - - - - - - - -
@ 1769 rpm @ 1771 rpm - - - - - - - - - - - -
29,317 25,436 - - - - - - - - - - - -
@ 1769 rpm @ 1771 rpm - - - - - - - - - - - -
29,336 25,460 - - - - - - - - - - - -
@ 1769 rpm @ 1771 rpm - - - - - - - - - - - -
29,347 25,476 - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - -
@ 1770 rpm @ 1770 rpm - - - - - - - - - - - -
Motor Core - El#13
Motor Shaft - El#16
Motor Shaft - El#17
Motor Shaft @ DE Brg - El#18
Case 01 Case 02 - - -
25,721 22,947 - - -
- - - - - - - - -
Drive Coupling - El#21
24,470 19,824 - - - - - - - - - - - -
@ 1770 rpm @ 1768 rpm - - - - - - - - - - - -
2-19
Tabl e 2-4B


Torsi onal Forced Response Anal ysi s

ANGI Dyprot ec Proj ect 07-Dec-2010
WEG 300 HP Mot or T. B. Woods HSH 42 Coupl i ng
Ari el JGQ/ 2 Compressor











Compressor Drive
Stub and Crankshaft Maximum Torque Maximum Torque Maximum Torque Maximum Torque Maximum Torque Maximum Torque
Vibratory Torques Amplitude Amplitude Amplitude Amplitude Amplitude Amplitude
and Speed and Speed and Speed and Speed and Speed and Speed
Notes: 1. All values are maximum combined order torque amplitudes - Units of measure are in-lbf (0-peak)
Notes: 2. Compressor drive stub combined order torque amplitude limit = 20,630 in-lbf (Fatigue S.F. = 1.5)
Notes: 3. Compressor crankshaft combined order torque amplitude limit = 28,400 in-lbf (Fatigue S.F. = 1.5)
- - -
- - -
- - -
- - -
- - - - - -
- - -
- - -
- - -
@ 1772 rpm @ 1176 rpm - - -
- - - - - - 10,123
- - - Case 01
- - - - - -
- - -
@ 1177 rpm - - -
- - - 14,670
- - -
- - -
Case 02
JGQ/2 Drive Stub - El#22
18,153
@ 944 rpm
JGQ/2 Throws #1-#2 - El#25
10,660
2-20
Tabl e 2-4C


Torsi onal Forced Response Anal ysi s

ANGI Dyprot ec Proj ect 07-Dec-2010
WEG 300 HP Mot or T. B. Woods HSH 42 Coupl i ng
Ari el JGQ/ 2 Compressor











Motor Core
Torsional Maximum Maximum Maximum Maximum Maximum Maximum
Oscillations Thermal Load Thermal Load Thermal Load Thermal Load Thermal Load Thermal Load
and Speed and Speed and Speed and Speed and Speed and Speed
Notes: 1. All values represent maximum combined order thermal load amplitudes - Units of measure are percent running speed
Notes: 2. Typical acceptable limit for low HP applications is between 2 - 3 percent
- - -
- - -
- - -
- - - - - -
- - - - - - - - -
- - -
Case 01 Case 02 - - -
- - -
- - - 1.4 1.1
@ 900 rpm @ 900 rpm
Motor Core - St#13(v)
2-21
Tabl e 2-4D


Torsi onal Forced Response Anal ysi s

ANGI Dyprot ec Proj ect 07-Dec-2010
WEG 300 HP Mot or T. B. Woods HSH 42 Coupl i ng
Ari el JGQ/ 2 Compressor












Compressor
Auxiliary Drive Maximum Maximum Maximum Maximum Maximum Maximum
Torsional Oscillations Amplitude Amplitude Amplitude Amplitude Amplitude Amplitude
Order and Speed Order and Speed Order and Speed Order and Speed Order and Speed Order and Speed
0.182 0.120 - - - - - - - - - - - -
@ 900 rpm @ 900 rpm - - - - - - - - - - - -
0.149 0.113 - - - - - - - - - - - -
@ 900 rpm @ 900 rpm - - - - - - - - - - - -
0.018 0.011 - - - - - - - - - - - -
@ 1800 rpm @ 1800 rpm - - - - - - - - - - - -
0.016 0.010 - - - - - - - - - - - -
@ 1800 rpm @ 1800 rpm - - - - - - - - - - - -
0.017 0.011 - - - - - - - - - - - -
@ 1800 rpm @ 1800 rpm - - - - - - - - - - - -
0.020 0.016 - - - - - - - - - - - -
@ 1800 rpm @ 1800 rpm - - - - - - - - - - - -
0.029 0.017 - - - - - - - - - - - -
@ 1800 rpm @ 1800 rpm - - - - - - - - - - - -
0.113 0.132 - - - - - - - - - - - -
@ 1770 rpm @ 1770 rpm - - - - - - - - - - - -
0.108 0.094 - - - - - - - - - - - -
@ 1573 rpm @ 1573 rpm - - - - - - - - - - - -
0.056 0.068 - - - - - - - - - - - -
@ 1416 rpm @ 1416 rpm - - - - - - - - - - - -
0.055 0.039 - - - - - - - - - - - -
@ 1287 rpm @ 1287 rpm - - - - - - - - - - - -
0.026 0.061 - - - - - - - - - - - -
@ 1180 rpm @ 1180 rpm - - - - - - - - - - - -
Notes: 1. All values represent maximum single order harmonic oscillation amplitudes - Units of measure are degrees (0-peak)
Notes: 2. Harmonic oscillation amplitude limit = 1.00 degrees for 0.5x, 1.0x, & 1.5x orders (OEM Limit)
Notes: 3. Harmonic oscillation amplitude limit = 0.50 degrees for 2.0x order (OEM Limit)
Notes: 4. Harmonic oscillation amplitude limit = 0.25 degrees for all orders above 2.0x (OEM Limit)
- - -
- - -
- - -
- - -
- - -
- - - - - -
- - -
- - -
- - -
- - - - - -
- - - - - -
- - -
JGQ/2 Aux Drive - St#28(d) 12.0x 12.0x - - -
JGQ/2 Aux Drive - St#28(d) 11.0x 11.0x - - -
JGQ/2 Aux Drive - St#28(d) 9.0x
JGQ/2 Aux Drive - St#28(d) 10.0x 10.0x - - -
9.0x - - -
- - -
- - - - - -
- - - - - -
- - -
- - - JGQ/2 Aux Drive - St#28(d) 8.0x 8.0x - - -
JGQ/2 Aux Drive - St#28(d) 7.0x 7.0x - - -
- - - - - -
- - -
JGQ/2 Aux Drive - St#28(d) 6.0x 6.0x - - -
5.0x - - - JGQ/2 Aux Drive - St#28(d) 5.0x
- - -
- - - - - -
- - - - - -
- - -
- - -
JGQ/2 Aux Drive - St#28(d) 1.0x
JGQ/2 Aux Drive - St#28(d) 4.0x 4.0x - - -
JGQ/2 Aux Drive - St#28(d) 3.0x 3.0x - - -
- - - - - -
JGQ/2 Aux Drive - St#28(d) 2.0x 2.0x - - - - - - - - -
Case 01 Case 02 - - - - - -
1.0x - - -
- - - - - -
3-1
3. TORSI ONAL VI BRATI ON ANALYSI S


3. 1 I NTRODUCTI ON

A t orsi onal vi brat i on anal ysi s of t he Mot or-Coupl i ng-Compressor dri ve
t rai n was conduct ed t o eval uat e i t s dynami c perf ormance. The anal ysi s
was perf ormed f or vari ous syst em operat i ng condi t i ons. General l y, such
anal ysi s produced t he f ol l owi ng resul t s:

NATURAL FREQUENCY and t hei r MODE SHAPES:

Thi s anal ysi s det ermi nes (f or a gi ven operat i ng condi t i on) al l of t he
nat ural f requenci es and t hei r modes of vi brat i on. I f any nat ural
f requency i s cl ose t o t he operat i ng speed, t hen a resonant condi t i on
may occur. Dependi ng on t he amount of dampi ng associ at ed wi t h t hi s
mode t he resonant vi brat i on l evel s may or may not be seri ous. Al so,
t he mode shapes gi ve an i ndi cat i on of where t he peak vi brat i ons are
occurri ng and where correct i ve measures woul d be of most hel p.

RESPONSE:

The response st udi es consi st of a f orced response and a t i me t ransi ent
response anal ysi s t hat produces t orsi onal vi brat i on l evel s of t he dri ve
t rai n as a f unct i on of t i me. Thi s anal ysi s al so det ermi nes t he average
and osci l l at i ng t orques at each l ocat i on al ong t he dri ve t rai n.

To const ruct a t orsi onal vi brat i on model , t he dri ve t rai n i s i deal i zed
mat hemat i cal l y as a seri es of l umped i nert i as t hat are connect ed by
t orsi onal spri ngs. I f known, t he shaf t i ng geomet ry can be i nput di rect l y
i nt o t he si mul at i on and t he resul t i ng i nert i as and t orsi onal spri ng val ues
are comput ed i nt ernal l y by t he comput er program. Al t ernat i vel y, t he
anal yst may cal cul at e t he i nert i as and st i f f ness dat a and t he resul t i ng
val ues can be i nput f or each el ement and/ or st at i on al ong t he dri ve t rai n.

The syst em eval uat ed i s a si ngl e branched syst em t hat can operat e over
a range of speeds bet ween 900 1800 rpm. The dri ve t rai n mat hemat i cal
model i s present ed i n Fi gure 3-1. Not e t hat t he model consi st s of 28
st at i ons and 27 el ement s. The dri ve coupl i ng i s represent ed by el ement
21 i n t he model and i s bounded by st at i ons 21 and 22. Throws #1 & #2 of
t he JGQ/ 2 compressor are l ocat ed at st at i ons 25 and 26, respect i vel y.
Graphi cal present at i ons of compl et e i nput dat a set s f or t he dri ve t rai n
t orsi onal model are present ed i n Fi gures 3-2 and 3-3.
3-2
3. 2 TORSI ONAL NATURAL FREQUENCY AND MODE SHAPES

The t orsi onal nat ural f requency and mode shape resul t s are comput ed
accordi ng t o t he f ol l owi ng f i ni t e-el ement based mat ri x sol ut i on procedure:


TORSIONAL VIBRATION ANALYSIS
NATURAL FREQUENCY AND MODE SHAPE SOLUTION PROCEDURE
[ ] { } [ ] { } [ ]{ } { } F X K X D X M = + +
& & &
WHERE: {X} = A column vector containing all system degrees of freedom
[M] = Diagonal mass and inertia matrix
[D] = Damping matr ix
[K] = System st iffness mat rix assembled from the st iffness of al l sections and
spr ings, etc.
(1)
{ }
[ ] { } [ ] { } [ ] { } { } F X K X D X M
O F LET
= + +
=
& & &
If we assume the solution to equation (2) to be of the form
{ } { }
t
e a X

=
&
Where a and are complex quantit ies. Then:
{ } { } { }
t t
e b e a X

= =
&
{ } { } a b =
where
similar ly:
{ } { }
t
e b X

=
& &
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)

Substituting equation(3), (4), and (6) and combining with equation (5) yields:
Solving for using QR2 algorithm
- Real part of is growth or at tenuation factor
- Imaginary part of is frequency
Substitute back in (2)
Solving for {a} yields mode shapes
[ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] } 0 { } {
2
= + + a K D M
(7)
(8)
[ ]
[ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]



D M K M
I
1 1
0 { }
{ }
{ }
{ }

b
a
b
a


3-3

Accept ed desi gn pract i ce di ct at es t hat t he t orsi onal f requenci es shoul d be
at l east 10% above or bel ow t he operat i ng speed range and t he second
harmoni c (t wi ce operat i ng speed) as wel l as 5% away f rom hi gher order
harmoni cs. I f t he comput ed t orsi onal nat ural f requenci es i ndi cat e t hat
t here are i nt erf erence(s) at several orders and modes, a t orsi onal / st ress
response anal ysi s i s requi red t o det ermi ne t he dynami c t orques al ong t he
syst em shaf t i ng and, more i mport ant l y, t o eval uat e t he dynami c
ampl i f i cat i on. I f t he resul t s i ndi cat e t hat t he t orques/ st resses are not
accept abl e, t hen modi f i cat i ons t o t he syst em i n t o mi t i gat e t he operat i onal
i nt erf erences and reduce t he syst em t orsi onal response shoul d be
undert aken.


3-4
3. 3 STEADY-STATE TORSI ONAL RESPONSE

Thi s anal ysi s comput es t he st eady-st at e t orsi onal response i n whi ch t he
dri ve t orque i s appl i ed at t he mot or core and t he act ual compressor l oad
t orques are appl i ed at each of t he t hrows t o det ermi ne t he syst em' s
response. Accordi ngl y, t hi s eval uat i on cal cul at es t he exact syst em
response at vari ous l ocat i ons al ong t he dri ve t rai n. The st eady-st at e
f orced response resul t s are comput ed accordi ng t o t he f ol l owi ng f i ni t e-
el ement based mat ri x sol ut i on procedure:



TORSIONAL VIBRATION ANALYSIS
FORCED RESPONSE SOLUTION PROCEDURE
[ ] { } [ ] { } [ ]{ } { }
t i
e F X K X D X M

= + +
& & &
(1)
WHERE: {X} = A column vector containing all system degrees of freedom
[M] = Diagonal mass and inertia matr ix
[D] = Damping matr ix
[K] = System st iffness mat rix assembled from the st iffness of al l shaft sections
and spr ings, etc.
If we assume the solution to equation (1) to be of the form:
{ } { }
t i
e a X

=
{ } { }
t i
e a i X

=
&
{ } { }
t i
e a X

2
=
& &
(2)
Substituting equation (2) into equat ion (1) yields:
(3) [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]{ } { }
t i t i
e F e a K D i M

= + +
2


Equation (3) can be solved wi th complex arithmet ic for {a}
For mult iple frequencies equation (3) is solved for each frequency
The total response can be computed from the superposit ion of all of the f requencies as shown in
equation (4)
{ } { }
t i
nFreq
j
j
j
e a X

=
=
1
(4)

3-5















































Fi gur e 3-1
Throw #1
W
E
G

3
0
0

H
P

M
o
t
o
r
A
r
i
e
l

J
G
Q
/
2

C
o
m
p
r
e
s
s
o
r
T
.
B
.

W
o
o
d
s
H
S
H

4
2

C
o
u
p
l
i
n
g
Throw #2
Motor Core
Aux Drive
3-6















































Fi gur e 3-2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1 0
1 1
1 2
1 3
1 4
1 5
1 6
1 7
1 8
1 9
2 0
2 1
2 2
2 3
2 4
2 5
2 6
2 7
L = 3 . 1 5 0 , O D 1 = O D 2 = 3 . 3 4 6
L = 2 . 0 4 7 , O D 1 = O D 2 = 3 . 7 3 8
L = 1 . 8 9 0 , O D 1 = O D 2 = 3 . 7 4 0
L = 1 . 7 7 2 , O D 1 = O D 2 = 4 . 2 8 0
L = 2 . 1 8 5 , O D 1 = O D 2 = 4 . 7 2 4
L = 0 . 4 5 3 , O D 1 = 4 . 7 2 4 , O D 2 = 4 . 8 1 2
L = 3 . 9 0 7 , O D 1 = O D 2 = 4 . 8 1 2
L = 3 . 9 0 7 , O D 1 = O D 2 = 4 . 8 1 2
L = 3 . 9 0 7 , O D 1 = O D 2 = 4 . 8 1 2
L = 3 . 9 0 7 , O D 1 = O D 2 = 4 . 8 1 2
L = 3 . 7 4 0 , O D 1 = O D 2 = 4 . 8 2 0
L = 3 . 7 4 0 , O D 1 = O D 2 = 4 . 8 2 0
L = 3 . 7 4 0 , O D 1 = O D 2 = 4 . 8 2 0
L = 3 . 7 4 0 , O D 1 = O D 2 = 4 . 8 2 0
L = 0 . 3 9 4 , O D 1 = O D 2 = 5 . 0 0 0
L = 1 . 7 7 2 , O D 1 = O D 2 = 4 . 8 3 1
L = 1 . 9 6 9 , O D 1 = O D 2 = 4 . 3 3 1
L = 1 . 8 5 0 , O D 1 = O D 2 = 4 . 3 2 9
L = 5 . 8 1 2 , O D 1 = O D 2 = 3 . 8 7 5
L = 1 . 5 6 3 , O D 1 = O D 2 = 3 . 8 7 5
L = 1 4 . 0 0 0 , O D 1 = 2 . 2 5 0 , K t = 2 . 8 5 7 e + 0 7
L = 1 . 0 0 0 , O D 1 = 2 . 6 2 5 , K t = 2 . 3 5 2 e + 0 8
L = 5 . 4 3 8 , O D 1 = 2 . 9 9 7 , K t = 1 . 3 1 0 e + 0 7
L = 3 . 7 5 0 , O D 1 = 2 . 9 9 7 , K t = 2 . 3 1 0 e + 0 7
L = 4 . 0 0 0 , O D 1 = 2 . 9 9 7 , K t = 1 . 9 5 0 e + 0 7
L = 3 . 7 5 0 , O D 1 = 2 . 9 9 7 , K t = 2 . 3 1 0 e + 0 7
L = 4 . 6 8 7 , O D 1 = 2 . 9 9 7 , K t = 6 . 9 0 0 e + 0 6
T
o
r
s
i
o
n
a
l

S
t
i
f
f
n
e
s
s

M
o
d
e
l
A
N
G
I

-
D
y
p
r
o
t
e
c

P
r
o
j
e
c
t

-
A
r
i
e
l

J
G
Q
/
2

C
o
m
p
r
e
s
s
o
r
W
E
G

3
0
0

H
P

M
o
t
o
r

(
F
r
a
m
e

5
8
6
/
7
T
)

-
T
B

W
o
o
d
s

H
S
H

4
2

C
o
u
p
l
i
n
g

(
A
P
I

S
p
e
c
.
)
S
p
e
e
d

R
a
n
g
e

=

9
0
0

-
1
8
0
0

r
p
m
N
o
t
e
:



L




=

L
e
n
g
t
h

o
f

e
l
a
s
t
i
c

e
l
e
m
e
n
t

(
i
n
)
K
t


=

T
o
r
s
i
o
n
a
l

s
t
i
f
f
n
e
s
s

(
i
n
-
l
b
f
/
r
a
d
)
O
D

=

O
u
t
e
r

d
i
a
m
e
t
e
r

(
i
n
)
I
D



=

I
n
n
e
r

d
i
a
m
e
t
e
r

(
i
n
)
Branch #1 - Motor - Coupling - Compressor
3-7















































Fi gur e 3-3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1 0
1 1
1 2
1 3
1 4
1 5
1 6
1 7
1 8
1 9
2 0
2 1
2 2
2 3
2 4
2 5
2 6
2 7
L = 3 . 1 5 0 , O D 1 = O D 2 = 3 . 3 4 6
L = 2 . 0 4 7 , O D 1 = O D 2 = 3 . 7 3 8
L = 1 . 8 9 0 , O D 1 = O D 2 = 3 . 7 4 0
L = 1 . 7 7 2 , O D 1 = O D 2 = 4 . 2 8 0
L = 2 . 1 8 5 , O D 1 = O D 2 = 4 . 7 2 4
L = 0 . 4 5 3 , O D 1 = 4 . 7 2 4 , O D 2 = 4 . 8 1 2
L = 3 . 9 0 7 , O D 1 = O D 2 = 4 . 8 1 2
L = 3 . 9 0 7 , O D 1 = O D 2 = 4 . 8 1 2
L = 3 . 9 0 7 , O D 1 = O D 2 = 4 . 8 1 2
L = 3 . 9 0 7 , O D 1 = O D 2 = 4 . 8 1 2
L = 3 . 7 4 0 , O D 1 = O D 2 = 4 . 8 2 0
L = 3 . 7 4 0 , O D 1 = O D 2 = 4 . 8 2 0
L = 3 . 7 4 0 , O D 1 = O D 2 = 4 . 8 2 0
L = 3 . 7 4 0 , O D 1 = O D 2 = 4 . 8 2 0
L = 0 . 3 9 4 , O D 1 = O D 2 = 5 . 0 0 0
L = 1 . 7 7 2 , O D 1 = O D 2 = 4 . 8 3 1
L = 1 . 9 6 9 , O D 1 = O D 2 = 4 . 3 3 1
L = 1 . 8 5 0 , O D 1 = O D 2 = 4 . 3 2 9
L = 5 . 8 1 2 , O D 1 = O D 2 = 3 . 8 7 5
L = 1 . 5 6 3 , O D 1 = O D 2 = 3 . 8 7 5
L = 1 4 . 0 0 0 , O D 1 = 2 . 2 5 0 , I p = 0 . 0 0 0 e + 0 0
L = 1 . 0 0 0 , O D 1 = 2 . 6 2 5 , I p = 0 . 0 0 0 e + 0 0
L = 5 . 4 3 8 , O D 1 = 2 . 9 9 7 , I p = 0 . 0 0 0 e + 0 0
L = 3 . 7 5 0 , O D 1 = 2 . 9 9 7 , I p = 0 . 0 0 0 e + 0 0
L = 4 . 0 0 0 , O D 1 = 2 . 9 9 7 , I p = 0 . 0 0 0 e + 0 0
L = 3 . 7 5 0 , O D 1 = 2 . 9 9 7 , I p = 0 . 0 0 0 e + 0 0
L = 4 . 6 8 7 , O D 1 = 2 . 9 9 7 , I p = 0 . 0 0 0 e + 0 0
I p = 7 5 8 1 . 7
I p = 7 5 8 1 . 7
I p = 7 5 8 1 . 7
I p = 1 0 6 1 . 0
I p = 9 6 9 . 5
I p = 4 5 . 4
I p = 8 1 . 5
I p = 1 5 1 . 7
I p = 1 5 1 . 6
I p = 7 1 . 7
I p = 3 5 . 6
T
o
r
s
i
o
n
a
l

I
n
e
r
t
i
a

M
o
d
e
l
A
N
G
I

-
D
y
p
r
o
t
e
c

P
r
o
j
e
c
t

-
A
r
i
e
l

J
G
Q
/
2

C
o
m
p
r
e
s
s
o
r
W
E
G

3
0
0

H
P

M
o
t
o
r

(
F
r
a
m
e

5
8
6
/
7
T
)

-
T
B

W
o
o
d
s

H
S
H

4
2

C
o
u
p
l
i
n
g

(
A
P
I

S
p
e
c
.
)
S
p
e
e
d

R
a
n
g
e

=

9
0
0

-
1
8
0
0

r
p
m
N
o
t
e
:



L




=

L
e
n
g
t
h

o
f

e
l
a
s
t
i
c

e
l
e
m
e
n
t

(
i
n
)
I
p



=

P
o
l
a
r

m
o
m
e
n
t

o
f

i
n
e
r
t
i
a

(
l
b
f
-
i
n
^
2
)
O
D

=

O
u
t
e
r

d
i
a
m
e
t
e
r

(
i
n
)
I
D



=

I
n
n
e
r

d
i
a
m
e
t
e
r

(
i
n
)
Branch #1 - Motor - Coupling - Compressor























APPENDIX A

St r ess/Fat i gue Anal ysi s


RBTS
MOTOR DRIVE EXTENSION SHAFT; FATIGUE CALCULATIONS AT DRIVER RATED TORQUE
1 of 2 ANGI - DYPROTEC PROJECT - ARIEL JGQ/2 COMPRESSOR - FATIGUE ANALYSIS
TORSION LOADING V1.02
CONFIG. #1: General Stress Concentration
MOTOR SHAFT @ DRIVE END BEARING
Shaft Geometry: WEG 300 HP Motor (Frame 586/7T)
Shaft Profile Drawing No. 10000538550
Reference diameter for nominal stress (d) d = 4.3287 (in)
Material: Alloy 4140 Steel (OEM Specs)
Ultimate tensile strength (Sut) Sut = 116,000.0 (psi)
Yield strength (Syt) Syt = 79,800.0 (psi)
Shaft Endurance Limit:
From Ref.[1], Section 3;
Se = ka kb kc kd ke S'e Se = 38,645.4 (psi) ................. [Eq. (8)]
ka = a (Sut)^b ka = 0.8946 ................................... [Eq. (9)]
From Table 3.1, and considering the shaft a = 1.3400
is ground; b = -0.0850
For 2"<d<=10"
kb = 0.91 d^-0.157 kb = 0.7230 (d<=10) ................. [Eq. (10b)]
For d > 10" kb = 0.6 [Eq. (10c)]
kc = 1 for bending and torsion kc = 1.0000 ................................... [Eq. (11)]
kd = ST / SRT ............................................................................ [Eq. (12)]
Consider maximum operating temperature = 121 C
From Table 3.2; kd = 1.0220
ke = miscellaneous- effects factor, ke = 1.0 ke = 1.0000
S'e = 0.504 Sut for Sut < 200 ksi S'e = 58,464.0 (psi) ................. [Eq. (1a)]
RBTS
MOTOR DRIVE EXTENSION SHAFT; FATIGUE CALCULATIONS AT DRIVER RATED TORQUE
2 of 2 ANGI - DYPROTEC PROJECT - ARIEL JGQ/2 COMPRESSOR - FATIGUE ANALYSIS
Stress Concentration Factors:
User-Specified Factor
Fatigue Stress Concentration Factor (Kfs) Kfs = 1.80
Fatigue Forces:
Mean/Average component of torque (Tm) Tm = 10,420 (in-lbf)
Alternating component of torque (Ta) Ta = 130,120 (in-lbf)
Fatigue Stresses
J/c =3.14 x (d)^3 /16 J/c = 15.9 (in^3)
Txym = mean torsional shear stress
=Tm c / J Txym = 654.3 (psi) ................. [Eq. (25)]
Txya = amplified alternating torsional shear stress
= Kfs Ta c / J Txya = 14,706.3 (psi) ................. [Eq. (26)]
S'm = Von Mises mean stress
= [(Sxm)^2 + 3 (Txym)^2] ^ 0.5 S'm = 1,133.2 (psi) ................. [Eq. (21)]
Sxm = 0
S'a = Von Mises alternating stress
= [ (Sxa)^2 + 3 (Txya)^2] ^ 0.5 S'a = 25,472.0 (psi) ................. [Eq. (22)]
Sxa = 0
Fatigue and Yielding Factors of Safety
Sxmax = Sxm+ Sxoa = 0 ............................................................................ [Eq. (33)]
Txyoa = Ta c / J ............................................................................ [Eq. (36)]
Txymax = Txym +Txyoa Txymax = 8,824.4 (psi) ................. [Eq. (34)]
S'max = [(Sxmax)^2+3 (Txymax)^2]^0.5 S'max = 15,284.3 (psi) ................. [Eq. (32)]
For Generic Stress Riser;
n (fatigue) = Se Sut / ( S'a Sut + S'm Se ) n (fatig) = 1.50 ................................... [Eq. (30)]
n (yielding) = Syt / S'max n (yield) = 5.22 ................................... [Eq. (31)]
RBTS
MOTOR DRIVE EXTENSION SHAFT; FATIGUE CALCULATIONS AT DRIVER RATED TORQUE
1 of 2 ANGI - DYPROTEC PROJECT - ARIEL JGQ/2 COMPRESSOR - FATIGUE ANALYSIS
TORSION LOADING V1.02
CONFIG. #1: General Stress Concentration
MOTOR SHAFT @ DRIVE END
Shaft Geometry: WEG 300 HP Motor (Frame 586/7T)
Shaft Profile Drawing No. 10000538550
Reference diameter for nominal stress (d) d = 3.8750 (in)
Material: Alloy 4140 Steel (OEM Specs)
Ultimate tensile strength (Sut) Sut = 116,000.0 (psi)
Yield strength (Syt) Syt = 79,800.0 (psi)
Shaft Endurance Limit:
From Ref.[1], Section 3;
Se = ka kb kc kd ke S'e Se = 39,323.1 (psi) ................. [Eq. (8)]
ka = a (Sut)^b ka = 0.8946 ................................... [Eq. (9)]
From Table 3.1, and considering the shaft a = 1.3400
is ground; b = -0.0850
For 2"<d<=10"
kb = 0.91 d^-0.157 kb = 0.7357 (d<=10) ................. [Eq. (10b)]
For d > 10" kb = 0.6 [Eq. (10c)]
kc = 1 for bending and torsion kc = 1.0000 ................................... [Eq. (11)]
kd = ST / SRT ............................................................................ [Eq. (12)]
Consider maximum operating temperature = 121 C
From Table 3.2; kd = 1.0220
ke = miscellaneous- effects factor, ke = 1.0 ke = 1.0000
S'e = 0.504 Sut for Sut < 200 ksi S'e = 58,464.0 (psi) ................. [Eq. (1a)]
RBTS
MOTOR DRIVE EXTENSION SHAFT; FATIGUE CALCULATIONS AT DRIVER RATED TORQUE
2 of 2 ANGI - DYPROTEC PROJECT - ARIEL JGQ/2 COMPRESSOR - FATIGUE ANALYSIS
Stress Concentration Factors:
User-Specified Factor
Fatigue Stress Concentration Factor (Kfs) Kfs = 1.85
Fatigue Forces:
Mean/Average component of torque (Tm) Tm = 10,420 (in-lbf)
Alternating component of torque (Ta) Ta = 91,870 (in-lbf)
Fatigue Stresses
J/c =3.14 x (d)^3 /16 J/c = 11.4 (in^3)
Txym = mean torsional shear stress
=Tm c / J Txym = 912.1 (psi) ................. [Eq. (25)]
Txya = amplified alternating torsional shear stress
= Kfs Ta c / J Txya = 14,876.5 (psi) ................. [Eq. (26)]
S'm = Von Mises mean stress
= [(Sxm)^2 + 3 (Txym)^2] ^ 0.5 S'm = 1,579.7 (psi) ................. [Eq. (21)]
Sxm = 0
S'a = Von Mises alternating stress
= [ (Sxa)^2 + 3 (Txya)^2] ^ 0.5 S'a = 25,766.8 (psi) ................. [Eq. (22)]
Sxa = 0
Fatigue and Yielding Factors of Safety
Sxmax = Sxm+ Sxoa = 0 ............................................................................ [Eq. (33)]
Txyoa = Ta c / J ............................................................................ [Eq. (36)]
Txymax = Txym +Txyoa Txymax = 8,953.4 (psi) ................. [Eq. (34)]
S'max = [(Sxmax)^2+3 (Txymax)^2]^0.5 S'max = 15,507.8 (psi) ................. [Eq. (32)]
For Generic Stress Riser;
n (fatigue) = Se Sut / ( S'a Sut + S'm Se ) n (fatig) = 1.50 ................................... [Eq. (30)]
n (yielding) = Syt / S'max n (yield) = 5.15 ................................... [Eq. (31)]
RBTS
COMPRESSOR CRANKSHAFT; FATIGUE CALCULATIONS AT DRIVER RATED TORQUE
1 of 2 ANGI - DYPROTEC PROJECT - ARIEL JGQ/2 COMPRESSOR - FATIGUE ANALYSIS
TORSION LOADING V1.02
CONFIG. #1: General Stress Concentration
COMPRESSOR DRIVE STUB
Shaft Geometry: JGQ/2 Compressor Drive Extension
Ariel Drawing JGQ/2 Crank Drawing D-1972 - Rev 0
Reference diameter for nominal stress (d) d = 2.5000 (in)
Material: ASTM A668 Class DH (Forged Carbon Steel)
Ultimate tensile strength (Sut) Sut = 90,000.0 (psi)
Yield strength (Syt) Syt = 45,000.0 (psi)
Shaft Endurance Limit:
From Ref.[1], Section 3;
Se = ka kb kc kd ke S'e Se = 33,395.1 (psi) ................. [Eq. (8)]
ka = a (Sut)^b ka = 0.9141 ................................... [Eq. (9)]
From Table 3.1, and considering the shaft a = 1.3400
is ground; b = -0.0850
For 2"<d<=10"
kb = 0.91 d^-0.157 kb = 0.7881 (d<=10) ................. [Eq. (10b)]
For d > 10" kb = 0.6 [Eq. (10c)]
kc = 1 for bending and torsion kc = 1.0000 ................................... [Eq. (11)]
kd = ST / SRT ............................................................................ [Eq. (12)]
Consider maximum operating temperature = 121 C
From Table 3.2; kd = 1.0220
ke = miscellaneous- effects factor, ke = 1.0 ke = 1.0000
S'e = 0.504 Sut for Sut < 200 ksi S'e = 45,360.0 (psi) ................. [Eq. (1a)]
RBTS
COMPRESSOR CRANKSHAFT; FATIGUE CALCULATIONS AT DRIVER RATED TORQUE
2 of 2 ANGI - DYPROTEC PROJECT - ARIEL JGQ/2 COMPRESSOR - FATIGUE ANALYSIS
Stress Concentration Factors:
User-Specified Factor
Fatigue Stress Concentration Factor (Kfs) Kfs = 1.73
Fatigue Forces:
Mean/Average component of torque (Tm) Tm = 10,420 (in-lbf)
Alternating component of torque (Ta) Ta = 20,630 (in-lbf)
Fatigue Stresses
J/c =3.14 x (d)^3 /16 J/c = 3.1 (in^3)
Txym = mean torsional shear stress
=Tm c / J Txym = 3,396.4 (psi) ................. [Eq. (25)]
Txya = amplified alternating torsional shear stress
= Kfs Ta c / J Txya = 11,633.1 (psi) ................. [Eq. (26)]
S'm = Von Mises mean stress
= [(Sxm)^2 + 3 (Txym)^2] ^ 0.5 S'm = 5,882.7 (psi) ................. [Eq. (21)]
Sxm = 0
S'a = Von Mises alternating stress
= [ (Sxa)^2 + 3 (Txya)^2] ^ 0.5 S'a = 20,149.1 (psi) ................. [Eq. (22)]
Sxa = 0
Fatigue and Yielding Factors of Safety
Sxmax = Sxm+ Sxoa = 0 ............................................................................ [Eq. (33)]
Txyoa = Ta c / J ............................................................................ [Eq. (36)]
Txymax = Txym +Txyoa Txymax = 10,120.7 (psi) ................. [Eq. (34)]
S'max = [(Sxmax)^2+3 (Txymax)^2]^0.5 S'max = 17,529.6 (psi) ................. [Eq. (32)]
For Generic Stress Riser;
n (fatigue) = Se Sut / ( S'a Sut + S'm Se ) n (fatig) = 1.50 ................................... [Eq. (30)]
n (yielding) = Syt / S'max n (yield) = 2.57 ................................... [Eq. (31)]
RBTS
COMPRESSOR CRANKSHAFT; FATIGUE CALCULATIONS AT DRIVER RATED TORQUE
1 of 2 ANGI - DYPROTEC PROJECT - ARIEL JGQ/2 COMPRESSOR - FATIGUE ANALYSIS
TORSION LOADING V1.02
CONFIG. #1: General Stress Concentration
COMPRESSOR MAIN JOURNALS/PINS
Shaft Geometry: JGQ/2 Bearings & Pins (Min. Dia.)
Reference diameter for nominal stress (d) d = 2.9970 (in)
Material: ASTM A668 Class DH (Forged Carbon Steel)
Ultimate tensile strength (Sut) Sut = 90,000.0 (psi)
Yield strength (Syt) Syt = 45,000.0 (psi)
Shaft Endurance Limit:
From Ref.[1], Section 3;
Se = ka kb kc kd ke S'e Se = 32,457.8 (psi) ................. [Eq. (8)]
ka = a (Sut)^b ka = 0.9141 ................................... [Eq. (9)]
From Table 3.1, and considering the shaft a = 1.3400
is ground; b = -0.0850
For 2"<d<=10"
kb = 0.91 d^-0.157 kb = 0.7660 (d<=10) ................. [Eq. (10b)]
For d > 10" kb = 0.6 [Eq. (10c)]
kc = 1 for bending and torsion kc = 1.0000 ................................... [Eq. (11)]
kd = ST / SRT ............................................................................ [Eq. (12)]
Consider maximum operating temperature = 121 C
From Table 3.2; kd = 1.0220
ke = miscellaneous- effects factor, ke = 1.0 ke = 1.0000
S'e = 0.504 Sut for Sut < 200 ksi S'e = 45,360.0 (psi) ................. [Eq. (1a)]
RBTS
COMPRESSOR CRANKSHAFT; FATIGUE CALCULATIONS AT DRIVER RATED TORQUE
2 of 2 ANGI - DYPROTEC PROJECT - ARIEL JGQ/2 COMPRESSOR - FATIGUE ANALYSIS
Stress Concentration Factors:
User-Specified Factor
Fatigue Stress Concentration Factor (Kfs) Kfs = 2.20
Fatigue Forces:
Mean/Average component of torque (Tm) Tm = 10,420 (in-lbf)
Alternating component of torque (Ta) Ta = 28,400 (in-lbf)
Fatigue Stresses
J/c =3.14 x (d)^3 /16 J/c = 5.3 (in^3)
Txym = mean torsional shear stress
=Tm c / J Txym = 1,971.4 (psi) ................. [Eq. (25)]
Txya = amplified alternating torsional shear stress
= Kfs Ta c / J Txya = 11,820.9 (psi) ................. [Eq. (26)]
S'm = Von Mises mean stress
= [(Sxm)^2 + 3 (Txym)^2] ^ 0.5 S'm = 3,414.6 (psi) ................. [Eq. (21)]
Sxm = 0
S'a = Von Mises alternating stress
= [ (Sxa)^2 + 3 (Txya)^2] ^ 0.5 S'a = 20,474.4 (psi) ................. [Eq. (22)]
Sxa = 0
Fatigue and Yielding Factors of Safety
Sxmax = Sxm+ Sxoa = 0 ............................................................................ [Eq. (33)]
Txyoa = Ta c / J ............................................................................ [Eq. (36)]
Txymax = Txym +Txyoa Txymax = 7,344.6 (psi) ................. [Eq. (34)]
S'max = [(Sxmax)^2+3 (Txymax)^2]^0.5 S'max = 12,721.1 (psi) ................. [Eq. (32)]
For Generic Stress Riser;
n (fatigue) = Se Sut / ( S'a Sut + S'm Se ) n (fatig) = 1.50 ................................... [Eq. (30)]
n (yielding) = Syt / S'max n (yield) = 3.54 ................................... [Eq. (31)]























APPENDIX B

Ref er enced Mat er i al s




































4140 Shaft material



Tensile strength = 800MPa
Yield strength = 550MPa
SPACER HSH SERIES
8 BOLT SPACER COUPLINGS
F524
The HSH series is designed for high torque, low speed applications. Hubs are cast iron. Steel is optional.
Spacers are cast grey or ductile iron. Flex discs are high strength alloy steel. Stainless steel flex discs are
optional. Dynamic balancing for higher speed operation is not recommended. Single plane balancing of
hubs and spacers is available.
DIMENSIONS IN INCHES
SIZE MAX BORE D
IRON STEEL
A (2) B DBSE F G H
22 2.25 6.00 8.00 3.00 2.50 0.43 3.87
26 2.62 6.87 9.50 3.50 2.88 0.55 4.50
31 3.12 3.63 8.12 10.87 4.12 3.37 0.62 5.50
35 3.62 4.00 9.12 12.06 4.56 3.75 0.66 6.12
37 3.75 4.50 10.06 13.12 5.12 4.00 0.81 6.50
42 4.25 4.75 11.00 13.93 5.43 4.25 0.81 7.00
45 4.50 5.13 11.87 14.75 5.75 4.50 0.87 7.43
50 5.12 5.50 13.43 16.81 6.81 5.00 1.06 9.50
55 5.62 6.25 15.00 18.68 7.68 5.50 1.25 9.50
60 6.50 7.12 16.75 20.93 8.43 6.25 1.34 10.50
70 7.00 7.87 18.93 23.62 9.62 7.00 1.50 11.75
75 7.75 8.75 20.62 25.00 10.50 7.25 1.53 13.00
80 8.00 9.12 22.37 26.87 11.37 7.75 1.56 13.75
85 8.50 9.62 23.75 28.62 12.12 8.25 1.62 14.50
92 10.00 11.00 25.75 31.00 13.00 9.00 1.75 15.87
105 10.50 12.00 29.25 34.25 13.25 10.50 1.75 20.00
160 16.00 17.00 33.50 40.25 16.25 12.00 2.25 24.00
ORDERING: HSH
Series couplings are sold
as complete assemblies.
Please specify hub type,
bore sizes, and flex disc
materials. A coupling will
be configured to meet
your specifications.
RATED MISALIGNMENT: 0.3 DEG/DISC
HUB TYPES SIZES
C.I. 22-160
STL 31-160
SEE PAGE F59
NOTE:
1) WEIGHT, WR
2
AND TORSIONAL STIFFNESS VALUES SHOWN ARE FOR CAST IRON HUBS AT MAXIMUM BORE SIZE.
2) HUB FLANGE DIAMETER MAY VARY WITH STEEL HUBS
HP PER
RATED TORQUE
PEAK O/L MAX
WEIGHT WR
2 TQ/RAD FREE END
SIZE 100 RPM
(lb. in.)
TORQUE RPM
(lbs.) (lb. in.
2
)
X10
6
(1) FLOAT
1.0S.F (lb. in.) (1) (1) (lb. in./rad) +/- inch
22 15.08 9,500 14.250 3,800 22 80 1.5 0.036
26 25.40 16,000 24,000 3,300 33 161 2.3 0.044
31 38.10 24,000 36,000 2,800 56 401 2.9 0.052
35 69.84 44,000 66,000 2,600 81 750 6.5 0.056
37 95.24 60,000 90,000 2,500 103 1,130 9.9 0.062
42 115.90 73,000 109,500 2,400 133 1,740 6.9 0.067
45 157.10 99,000 148,500 2,250 161 2,510 14.8 0.072
50 203.20 128,000 192,000 2,000 223 4,580 44.3 0.082
55 300.00 189,000 283,500 1,800 302 7,480 54.2 0.092
60 414.30 261,000 391,500 1,600 435 13,800 80.1 0.102
70 658.70 415,000 622,500 1,400 640 25,900 144 0.115
75 846.00 533,000 799,500 1,300 839 38,600 148 0.125
80 1,087.00 685,000 1,027,500 1,200 1,070 59,800 205 0.136
85 1,316.00 829,000 1,243,500 1,100 1,240 79,400 204 0.140
92 1,651.00 1,040,000 1,560,000 1,000 1,710 131,000 384 0.156
105 1,984.00 1,250,000 1,875,000 1,000 C/F C/F C/F 0.170
160 3,175.00 2,000,000 3,000,000 900 C/F C/F C/F 0.250

Spacer to be machined steel
Form-Flex HSH and FSH Series Disc Couplings
TORQUE CAPACITIES FOR VIBRATORY LOAD CONDITIONS
IN RECIPROCATING / GAS COMPRESSION APPLICATIONS
COUPLING RATED VIBRATORY PEAK TORQUE
SIZE TORQUE CAPACITY lb*in
lb*in MAX MIN
31 24,000 19,400 (9,700)
35 44,000 29,200 (14,600)
37 60,000 43,900 (21,900)
42 73,000 55,600 (27,800)
45 99,000 59,700 (29,800)
50 128,000 98,700 (49,300)
55 189,000 150,000 (75,400)
60 261,000 220,000 (110,000)
70 415,000 318,000 (158,000)
75 533,000 430,000 (215,000)
80 685,000 575,000 (285,000)
85 829,000 735,000 (365,000)
92 1,040,000 795,000 (390,000)
jsm 6/26/03
TB Woods Incorporated
2000 Clovis Barker Road
San Marcos, Texas 78666
Tel: 512-353-4000
Fax: 512-353-4017
Notes:
1) These vibratory torque ratings are intended for use by qualified engineering personnel to
determine the suitability of a given coupling size based on the results of a torsional analysis
study.
2) Couplings should first be selected based on operating power and speed (mean operating torque)
using an appropriate service factor for the application conditions.
3) Vibratory peak torque is defined as the sum of the mean operating torque and the max or min
"sum of orders" for vibratory torque.
EXAMPLE:
Application: Cat G3516 Engine rated 1340 HP driving Ariel JGE/4 at 1400 RPM.
Basic Selection: 1340 HP at 1400 RPM and 3.25 S.F. calculates to 196,000 lb*in torque, so the
basic selection vs Rated Torque capacity is the FSH60.
Torsional Analysis Results: Mean application torque = 60,000 lb*in.
Vibratory torques calculated in the torsional analysis were +128,000 / -110,500 lb*in.
Vibratory Peak Torque calculation: Max = 60,000 + 128,000 = 188,000 lb*in
Min = 60,000 - 110,500 = - 50,500 lb*in
Conclusion: The Vibratory Peak Torques are within the rated range of +220,000 / -110,000 lb*in
for the FSH60 coupling, so the basic selection is confirmed.
Configuration
Company: Ariel Corporation Customer: DYPROTEC
Project #: AP020713 Rev:8 Inquiry: GCO-ON-0410-ET-48-0001
7.6.4.0 Case 1: Project:
ECO-PETROL SARDNATA GAS
PLANT
Elevation,ft: 50.00 Barmtr,psia: 14.669 Ambient,F: 100.00
Service: Service 1
Flow,MMSCFD: 3.050
Ps Line, psig: 349.92
Ps Loss, psi: 0.00
Suct Temp, F: 80.00
Pd Line, psig: 1324.92
Gas Model: VMG
Gas Analysis: Yes
Specific Gravity: 0.7291
Remove Water: No
Calc Press Loss: Yes
Enter Oper Params: No
Stage: 1 2
Enabled: Yes Yes
Press Loss, psi: 10.00 13.40
Cooler Temp,F: 120.00 120.00
Calc N&Z: Yes Yes
N: 1.2740 1.2711
Zs: 0.9196 0.8905
Zd: 0.9108 0.8948
Side,MMSCFD: N/A N/A
Side,F: N/A N/A
Side, SG: N/A N/A
Condensate,%: N/A N/A
Enter Gas: No No
11/29/2010 15:32:50 Note: BOLD=Out of Limits, ITALIC=Special Appl, BOLD=Review MMSCFD at 14.70 psia, 60.0 F Page: 1 of 17
File: T:\Projects\ANGI\Dyprotec_300HP_JGQ2\Eng_Data\AP020713_CWY.RUN Gath Case:1 - Pkg:1
Ariel Performance
Company: Ariel Corporation Customer: DYPROTEC
Project #: AP020713 Rev:8 Inquiry: GCO-ON-0410-ET-48-0001
7.6.4.0 Case 1: Project:
ECO-PETROL SARDNATA GAS
PLANT
Compressor Data: Driver Data:
Elevation,ft: 50.00 Barmtr,psia: 14.669 Ambient,F: 100.00 Type: VFD
Frame: JGQ/2 Stroke, in: 3.00 Rod Dia, in: 1.125 Mfg:
Max RL Tot, lbf: 20000 Max RL Tens, lbf: 10000 Max RL Comp, lbf: 11000 Model:
Rated RPM: 1800 Rated BHP: 280.0 Rated PS FPM: 900.0 BHP: 300
Calc RPM: 1750.0 BHP: 264 Calc PS FPM: 875.0 Avail: 300 (0)
Services Service 1
Stage Data: 1 2
Flow Req'd, MMSCFD 3.050 3.050
Flow Calc, MMSCFD 3.179 3.179
Cyl BHP per Stage 115.7 142.5
Specific Gravity 0.7291 0.7291
Ratio of Sp Ht (N) 1.2740 1.2711
Comp Suct (Zs) 0.9196 0.8905
Comp Disch (Zd) 0.9108 0.8948
Pres Suct Line, psig 349.92 N/A
Pres Suct Flg, psig 349.92 644.65
Pres Disch Flg, psig 654.65 1338.31
Pres Disch Line, psig N/A 1324.92
Pres Ratio F/F 1.836 2.052
Temp Suct, F 80.00 120.00
Temp Clr Disch, F 120.00 120.00
Cylinder Data: Throw 1 Throw 2
Cyl Model 5-1/8JGU 3-5/8JG
Cyl Bore, in 5.125 3.625
Cyl RDP (API), psig 786.4 1490.9
Cyl MAWP, psig 865.0 1640.0
Cyl Action DBL DBL
Cyl Disp, CFM 122.3 59.7
Pres Suct Intl, psig 323.54 595.57
Temp Suct Intl, F 83 123
Suct Zsph 0.9211 0.8927
Pres Disch Intl, psig 701.24 1436.78
Temp Disch Intl, F 178 242
HE Suct Gas Vel, FPM 8282 8574
HE Disch Gas Vel, FPM 7135 7769
HE Spcrs Used/Max 0/1 0/1
HE Vol Pkt Avail, % 1.01+45.66 No Pkt
Vol Pkt Used, % 100.00 (V) No Pkt
HE Min Clr, % 15.04 14.04
HE Total Clr, % 61.71 14.04
CE Suct Gas Vel, FPM 7492 7748
CE Disch Gas Vel, FPM 6791 7021
CE Spcrs Used/Max 0/2 0/1
CE Min Clr, % 16.21 17.19
CE Total Clr, % 16.21 17.19
Suct Vol Eff HE/CE, % 56.4/84.3 83.7/81.4
Disch Event HE/CE, ms 6.5/9.3 7.8/8.7
Suct Pseudo-Q HE/CE 8.5/6.6 8.4/6.9
Gas Rod Ld Comp, % 73.7 C 84.8 C
Gas Rod Ld Tens, % 71.1 T 72.1 T
Gas Rod Ld Total, % 76.1 82.7
Xhd Pin Deg/%Rvrsl lbf 171/95.0 178/71.5
Flow Calc, MMSCFD 3.179 3.179
Cyl BHP 115.7 142.5
11/29/2010 15:32:50 Note: BOLD=Out of Limits, ITALIC=Special Appl, BOLD=Review MMSCFD at 14.70 psia, 60.0 F Page: 2 of 17
File: T:\Projects\ANGI\Dyprotec_300HP_JGQ2\Eng_Data\AP020713_CWY.RUN Gath Case:1 - Pkg:1
Load Case #01
Fourier Expansion Coefficients
Company: Ariel Corporation Customer: DYPROTEC
Project #: AP020713 Rev:8 Inquiry: GCO-ON-0410-ET-48-0001
7.6.4.0 Case 1: Project:
ECO-PETROL SARDNATA GAS
PLANT
Frame: JGQ/2 Stroke: 3.00 in Conrod Center Dist: 8.25 in Rotation: Clockwise
Combined
Fourier Expansion Coefficient Computation:
TORQUE(X) = A0 + Summation { AH * Cosine(HX) + BH * Sine(HX) }
Order H steps from 1 to 24 in increments of 1.
Angle X (in radians) ranges from -PI to +PI.
Note that Phase Angle is computed in degrees.
Angles are measured in the direction of rotation when looking aft from the drive stub to the aux end. Zero degrees is Piston #1
Outer Dead Center at 9 o''clock.
The average value, in-lbs 9509.2
The minimum value, in-lbs -375.4
The maximum value, in-lbs 25592.8
Ratio of min/avg: -0.039
Ratio of max/avg: 2.691
Peak to Peak, in-lbs 25968.2
(Peak-Peak)/2, in-lbs 12984.1
Order
-H-
AH Coeff
in-lbs
BH Coeff
in-lbs
Vector Sum
in-lbs
Percent
of A0(%)
Phase
deg
Vector Sum Graph
0 9509.2 --- --- --- ---
1 1257.5 -2348.2 2663.7 28.0 -61.8
2 -10730.1 -1676.9 10860.4 114.2 -171.1
3 -1438.7 7.1 1438.7 15.1 179.7
4 757.4 797.8 1100.1 11.6 46.5
5 -19.1 1007.5 1007.6 10.6 91.1
6 341.4 -644.8 729.6 7.7 -62.1
7 263.7 -541.4 602.2 6.3 -64.0
8 124.2 208.3 242.5 2.6 59.2
9 -131.7 188.8 230.2 2.4 124.9
10 -55.8 -111.1 124.3 1.3 -116.7
11 101.8 -56.5 116.4 1.2 -29.0
12 41.1 46.2 61.8 0.7 48.4
13 -92.2 20.3 94.4 1.0 167.6
14 28.8 -19.0 34.5 0.4 -33.5
15 107.0 -15.7 108.1 1.1 -8.3
16 -8.1 6.0 10.1 0.1 143.4
17 -78.9 -3.4 79.0 0.8 -177.6
18 -18.4 -7.4 19.8 0.2 -158.1
19 30.1 30.3 42.7 0.4 45.2
20 32.2 20.1 37.9 0.4 31.9
21 10.1 -39.1 40.4 0.4 -75.5
22 -10.2 -31.5 33.1 0.3 -107.9
23 -17.7 21.7 28.0 0.3 129.1
24 -10.9 29.0 31.0 0.3 110.5
11/29/2010 15:32:51 Note: BOLD=Out of Limits, ITALIC=Special Appl, BOLD=Review MMSCFD at 14.70 psia, 60.0 F Page: 3 of 17
File: T:\Projects\ANGI\Dyprotec_300HP_JGQ2\Eng_Data\AP020713_CWY.RUN Gath Case:1 - Pkg:1
Torque Demand Graph
Company: Ariel Corporation Customer: DYPROTEC
Project #: AP020713 Rev:8 Inquiry: GCO-ON-0410-ET-48-0001
7.6.4.0 Case 1: Project:
ECO-PETROL SARDNATA GAS
PLANT
Frame: JGQ/2 Stroke: 3.00 in Conrod Center Dist: 8.25 in Rotation: Clockwise
11/29/2010 15:32:51 Note: BOLD=Out of Limits, ITALIC=Special Appl, BOLD=Review MMSCFD at 14.70 psia, 60.0 F Page: 6 of 17
File: T:\Projects\ANGI\Dyprotec_300HP_JGQ2\Eng_Data\AP020713_CWY.RUN Gath Case:1 - Pkg:1
Ariel Performance
Company: Ariel Corporation Customer: DYPROTEC
Project #: AP020713 Rev:8 Inquiry: GCO-ON-0410-ET-48-0001
7.6.4.0 Case 2: Project:
ECO-PETROL SARDNATA GAS
PLANT
Compressor Data: Driver Data:
Elevation,ft: 50.00 Barmtr,psia: 14.669 Ambient,F: 100.00 Type: VFD
Frame: JGQ/2 Stroke, in: 3.00 Rod Dia, in: 1.125 Mfg:
Max RL Tot, lbf: 20000 Max RL Tens, lbf: 10000 Max RL Comp, lbf: 11000 Model:
Rated RPM: 1800 Rated BHP: 280.0 Rated PS FPM: 900.0 BHP: 300
Calc RPM: 1750.0 BHP: 192 Calc PS FPM: 875.0 Avail: 300 (0)
Rod Load
Services Service 1
Stage Data: 1 2
Flow Req'd, MMSCFD 3.050 3.050
Flow Calc, MMSCFD 1.573 1.573
Cyl BHP per Stage 68.6 118.0
Specific Gravity 0.7290 0.7290
Ratio of Sp Ht (N) 1.2500 1.2557
Comp Suct (Zs) 0.9624 0.9295
Comp Disch (Zd) 0.9559 0.9298
Pres Suct Line, psig 199.92 N/A
Pres Suct Flg, psig 199.92 395.83
Pres Disch Flg, psig 405.83 1338.31
Pres Disch Line, psig N/A 1324.92
Pres Ratio F/F 1.960 3.296
Temp Suct, F 120.00 120.00
Temp Clr Disch, F 120.00 120.00
Cylinder Data: Throw 1 Throw 2
Cyl Model 5-1/8JGU 3-5/8JG
Cyl Bore, in 5.125 3.625
Cyl RDP (API), psig 786.4 1490.9
Cyl MAWP, psig 865.0 1640.0
Cyl Action DBL DBL
Cyl Disp, CFM 122.3 59.7
Pres Suct Intl, psig 186.11 366.64
Temp Suct Intl, F 123 125
Suct Zsph 0.9631 0.9316
Pres Disch Intl, psig 431.82 1425.01
Temp Disch Intl, F 224 307
HE Suct Gas Vel, FPM 8282 8574
HE Disch Gas Vel, FPM 7135 7769
HE Spcrs Used/Max 0/1 0/1
HE Vol Pkt Avail, % 1.01+45.66 No Pkt
Vol Pkt Used, % 100.00 (V) No Pkt
HE Min Clr, % 15.04 14.04
HE Total Clr, % 61.71 14.04
CE Suct Gas Vel, FPM 7492 7748
CE Disch Gas Vel, FPM 6791 7021
CE Spcrs Used/Max 0/2 0/1
CE Min Clr, % 16.21 17.19
CE Total Clr, % 16.21 17.19
Suct Vol Eff HE/CE, % 50.3/82.6 71.0/66.1
Disch Event HE/CE, ms 5.8/8.9 5.6/6.3
Suct Pseudo-Q HE/CE 7.6/5.9 8.1/6.6
Gas Rod Ld Comp, % 47.7 C 103.2 C
Gas Rod Ld Tens, % 46.4 T 94.6 T
Gas Rod Ld Total, % 49.5 104.0
Xhd Pin Deg/%Rvrsl lbf 152/88.2 175/75.3
Flow Calc, MMSCFD 1.573 1.573
Cyl BHP 68.6 118.0
11/29/2010 15:32:51 Note: BOLD=Out of Limits, ITALIC=Special Appl, BOLD=Review MMSCFD at 14.70 psia, 60.0 F Page: 12 of 17
File: T:\Projects\ANGI\Dyprotec_300HP_JGQ2\Eng_Data\AP020713_CWY.RUN Gath Case:2 - Pkg:1
Load Case #02
Fourier Expansion Coefficients
Company: Ariel Corporation Customer: DYPROTEC
Project #: AP020713 Rev:8 Inquiry: GCO-ON-0410-ET-48-0001
7.6.4.0 Case 2: Project:
ECO-PETROL SARDNATA GAS
PLANT
Frame: JGQ/2 Stroke: 3.00 in Conrod Center Dist: 8.25 in Rotation: Clockwise
Combined
Fourier Expansion Coefficient Computation:
TORQUE(X) = A0 + Summation { AH * Cosine(HX) + BH * Sine(HX) }
Order H steps from 1 to 24 in increments of 1.
Angle X (in radians) ranges from -PI to +PI.
Note that Phase Angle is computed in degrees.
Angles are measured in the direction of rotation when looking aft from the drive stub to the aux end. Zero degrees is Piston #1
Outer Dead Center at 9 o''clock.
The average value, in-lbs 6930.4
The minimum value, in-lbs -265.8
The maximum value, in-lbs 16638.1
Ratio of min/avg: -0.038
Ratio of max/avg: 2.401
Peak to Peak, in-lbs 16903.9
(Peak-Peak)/2, in-lbs 8451.9
Order
-H-
AH Coeff
in-lbs
BH Coeff
in-lbs
Vector Sum
in-lbs
Percent
of A0(%)
Phase
deg
Vector Sum Graph
0 6930.4 --- --- --- ---
1 914.2 -1674.3 1907.6 27.5 -61.4
2 -6729.0 -1900.0 6992.1 100.9 -164.2
3 -798.4 255.6 838.3 12.1 162.2
4 -514.6 295.7 593.5 8.6 150.1
5 -420.9 440.2 609.0 8.8 133.7
6 573.5 78.2 578.8 8.4 7.8
7 342.1 34.2 343.8 5.0 5.7
8 145.7 -235.1 276.6 4.0 -58.2
9 -11.4 -196.2 196.6 2.8 -93.3
10 -144.1 -27.6 146.7 2.1 -169.2
11 -69.1 42.2 81.0 1.2 148.6
12 72.6 108.2 130.4 1.9 56.1
13 8.6 77.0 77.5 1.1 83.7
14 40.2 -58.9 71.3 1.0 -55.7
15 87.9 -66.0 109.9 1.6 -36.9
16 -26.8 -4.3 27.1 0.4 -170.9
17 -82.1 -12.6 83.1 1.2 -171.3
18 -5.0 10.0 11.2 0.2 116.7
19 14.5 49.0 51.1 0.7 73.6
20 16.5 11.4 20.1 0.3 34.6
21 33.8 -20.0 39.3 0.6 -30.6
22 4.5 -12.7 13.5 0.2 -70.5
23 -19.8 -19.6 27.9 0.4 -135.3
24 -12.2 -5.4 13.3 0.2 -155.9
11/29/2010 15:32:51 Note: BOLD=Out of Limits, ITALIC=Special Appl, BOLD=Review MMSCFD at 14.70 psia, 60.0 F Page: 13 of 17
File: T:\Projects\ANGI\Dyprotec_300HP_JGQ2\Eng_Data\AP020713_CWY.RUN Gath Case:2 - Pkg:1
Torque Demand Graph
Company: Ariel Corporation Customer: DYPROTEC
Project #: AP020713 Rev:8 Inquiry: GCO-ON-0410-ET-48-0001
7.6.4.0 Case 2: Project:
ECO-PETROL SARDNATA GAS
PLANT
11/29/2010 15:32:51 Note: BOLD=Out of Limits, ITALIC=Special Appl, BOLD=Review MMSCFD at 14.70 psia, 60.0 F Page: 17 of 17
File: T:\Projects\ANGI\Dyprotec_300HP_JGQ2\Eng_Data\AP020713_CWY.RUN Gath Case:2 - Pkg:1
Mass Elastic Data
Company: Ariel Corporation Customer: DYPROTEC
Project #: AP020713 Rev:8 Inquiry: GCO-ON-0410-ET-48-0001
7.6.4.0 Case 1: Project:
ECO-PETROL SARDNATA GAS
PLANT
Frame: JGQ/2 Stroke: 3.00 in Conrod Center Dist: 8.25 in Rotation: Clockwise
Throw #: 1 2
Cylinder Model: 5-1/8JGU 3-5/8JG
Cylinder Bore,in 5.125 3.625
WEIGHTS, lbs:
Conrod Large End: 9.09 9.09
Conrod Small End: 5.31 5.31
Piston & Rod Assembly: 22.40 16.40
X-Head: 8.10 8.10
X-Head Pin Assembly: 4.87 4.87
Balance Nut: 0.70 6.60
Recip Weight,lbs 41.38 41.28
THROW INERTIA:
Crankpin,lbin2: 84.310 84.310
Conrod Large End,lbin2: 20.444 20.444
Recip Weight,lbin2: 46.941 46.828
Total, lbin2: 151.696 151.582
MASS ELASTIC DATA
Location
Station
(in) Symbo
l
Inertia
(lbin2)
Internal Flywheel
(lbin2) Symbo
l
Stiffness
(in-lbs/RAD x 10E6)
Shoulder Stop 0.000 I1 45.400 K1 13.100
Main #1 CL 5.438 I2 81.500 K2 23.100
Throw #1 CL 9.188 I3 151.696 K3 19.500
Throw #2 CL 13.188 I4 151.582 K4 23.100
Main #2 CL 16.938 I5 71.700 K5 6.900
Aux Drive End 21.625 I6 35.600
Total: 537.478 0.000
Crankshaft Material:
Material: ASTM A668 Class DH/AISI 1045 (Forged Carbon Steel)
Yield, psi: 45000
Tensile, psi: 90000
NOTES:
1. Inertia and Stiffness of the drive stub forward of the stop shoulder are not included in this table.
2. Throw Inertias include inertia for the crankshaft, as well as the connecting rod, crosshead, balance nut and piston and
rod assembly for that throw.
3. Drive stub stiffness must be calculated appropriately depending upon coupling or flanged hub connection.
4. Mass elastic data listed does not include the added inertia from any optional flywheels or detuners.
5. Refer to the Ariel Packager Standards, section 5 (ER-56.05), for additional information regarding the compressor drive
system and the torsional analysis requirements.
6. Inertia is for bare compressor only. If an internal auxilliary end flywheel is selected it will show above. Does not include
driver, coupling, external flywheel, or internal detuners (donuts).
7. For inertia units of lbinsec2, divide the value of lbin2 by 386.1 in/sec2.
11/29/2010 15:32:51 Note: BOLD=Out of Limits, ITALIC=Special Appl, BOLD=Review MMSCFD at 14.70 psia, 60.0 F Page: 7 of 17
File: T:\Projects\ANGI\Dyprotec_300HP_JGQ2\Eng_Data\AP020713_CWY.RUN Gath Case:1 - Pkg:1
Auxiliary-End Torsional Vibration Amplitude Limits
Company: Ariel Corporation Customer: DYPROTEC
Project #: AP020713 Rev:8 Inquiry: GCO-ON-0410-ET-48-0001
7.6.4.0 Case 1: Project:
ECO-PETROL SARDNATA GAS
PLANT
Frame: JGQ/2 Stroke: 3.00 in Conrod Center Dist: 8.25 in Rotation: Clockwise
The following limits are for any individual harmonic. If more than one significant individual harmonic exists at a single speed with
amplitude levels near the limit, an overall level should be examined and discussed with Ariel Corporations Field Service
Department.
Ariel Corporation Dec 1, 2006
Compressor
Auxiliary-End
Drive Design
Ariel Compressor Frames Included Acceptable Compressor Auxiliary End Vibration Limits
(degrees 0-peak)
Single Chain
All single throw frames
All 2 & 4 throw frames in classes
JG:A:M:P:N:Q:W:R:J:H:E:K:T:C:D
JGA/6 & JGJ/6
Older 6 throw JGC:D frames shipped
before Sept. 16, 2002 (approximate
frame serial number F18137)
1 degree for first harmonic (1X)
1 degree for engine induced orders from to 1-1/2X
degree for second harmonic (2X)
degree for harmonics above second (>2X)
degree for engine induced orders greater than 2X
Dual Chain
All 2 throw frames in classes JGZ:U
All 4 throw frames in classes
JGZ:U:B:V:KBB:KBV
6 throw JGE:K:T:Z:U:B:V:KBB:KBV
Newer 6 throw JGC:D frames shipped
after Sept. 16, 2002 (approximate
frame serial number F18137)
2 degree for first harmonic (1X)
2 degree for engine induced orders from to 1-1/2X
1 degree for second harmonic (2X)
degree for harmonics above second (>2X)
degree for engine induced orders greater than 2X
11/29/2010 15:32:51 Note: BOLD=Out of Limits, ITALIC=Special Appl, BOLD=Review MMSCFD at 14.70 psia, 60.0 F Page: 8 of 17
File: T:\Projects\ANGI\Dyprotec_300HP_JGQ2\Eng_Data\AP020713_CWY.RUN Gath Case:1 - Pkg:1
Shaft Drawing
Company: Ariel Corporation Customer: DYPROTEC
Project #: AP020713 Rev:8 Inquiry: GCO-ON-0410-ET-48-0001
7.6.4.0 Case 1: Project:
ECO-PETROL SARDNATA GAS
PLANT
Frame: JGQ/2 Stroke: 3.00 in Conrod Center Dist: 8.25 in Rotation: Clockwise
11/29/2010 15:32:51 Note: BOLD=Out of Limits, ITALIC=Special Appl, BOLD=Review MMSCFD at 14.70 psia, 60.0 F Page: 9 of 17
File: T:\Projects\ANGI\Dyprotec_300HP_JGQ2\Eng_Data\AP020713_CWY.RUN Gath Case:1 - Pkg:1
Station Drawing
Company: Ariel Corporation Customer: DYPROTEC
Project #: AP020713 Rev:8 Inquiry: GCO-ON-0410-ET-48-0001
7.6.4.0 Case 1: Project:
ECO-PETROL SARDNATA GAS
PLANT
Frame: JGQ/2 Stroke: 3.00 in Conrod Center Dist: 8.25 in Rotation: Clockwise
11/29/2010 15:32:51 Note: BOLD=Out of Limits, ITALIC=Special Appl, BOLD=Review MMSCFD at 14.70 psia, 60.0 F Page: 10 of 17
File: T:\Projects\ANGI\Dyprotec_300HP_JGQ2\Eng_Data\AP020713_CWY.RUN Gath Case:1 - Pkg:1

You might also like