You are on page 1of 2

Subject- Review of the measurement of Kh. No. 202/4 bearing City Survey No.

461, Mouza:
Zingabai Takli, Nagpur
Reference: Undated Notice from the City Survey Officer No.3 to appear on 7-8-14 at 11.00
a.m. on 7-8-14 in his office.
Sir,
In reference to the above cited notice from the City Survey Officer No.3 we have filed a reply on
6-8-14.[Document No.1]
As per the Notice our representative Shri Ashok Shahdadpuri attended the office of the City
Survey Officer No.3 at 11.00 a.m. sharp. But, the City Survey Officer No.3 came to the office at
about 12.40 p.m. The Proceeding in the matter was started at about 1.00 p.m.
The submissions made by us before the City Survey Officer No.3 are as under-
That, we have already submitted our letter on 6-8-14 which should be taken on record of the
proceedings.
That, as already submitted in the letter, the notice is wrongly sent to Heera Laxmi Developers .
The correct addressee is SilverLine Courier and Cargo Pvt. Ltd. owner of the adjacent Plot 2-A in
Kh. No. 202/3. As requested time and again any Notice should be issued to the correct owner as
above.
That, each and every notice issued in the matter of measurements for the subject matter land
to Heera Laxmi Developers is objected upon by us i.e. Silver Line Courier and Cargo Pvt. Ltd. the
correct owner as above.
That, as already intimated by our the various letters, the matter of the land in question is
subjudice vide the Case bearing RCS No.616/2013 before the 4
th
Civil Judge Senior Division
Nagpur, in which the Court has ordered the defendants applicant from encroaching the said
property.
That, we or Heera Laxmi Developers were not made party to the Case in which order was
passed by the Superintend Land Records on 7-6-14 in respect of the review of measurements
under the subject matter land.
That, we requested to supply certified copy of the order so as to enable us to form and submit
our arguments in this matter.
That, on coming to know about measurements already done on 30-5-14, while making
submissions by other party, we objected that for this measurements on 30-5-14 by the City
Survey Officer No.3 we or Heera Laxmi Developers were not issued any notice, mandatory and
therefore the measurements done in our absence are not binding upon us and this should be
recorded in the present proceedings of the case.
On this matter of non-issue of Notice, we are directed by the City Survey Officer No.3 to write
separate letter.
As such, we submitted a separate letter on the spot objecting to the above measurement and
requesting issue of certified copy of the order that was passed by the Superintend Land Records
on 7-6-14 in the land under subject. [Document No.2]
The next date in the matter is fixed for 20-8-14 at 12.30 p.m. Our request to kindly grant us
more time and further extend the date as copy of the order is yet to be received and after that
we have to form our argument was denied.
It is further submitted that earlier, to all the notices/letters issued, the objections were filed
vide letters on 30-4-14, 27-3-12, telegram dated 26-3-12, letters on 22-3-12, 3-1-12, telegram
on 23-12-11, letters on 22-12-11, 27-7-11 and 21-7-11.[Document Nos. 3/1 to3/9]

You might also like