KILPATRICK STOCKTON LLP

Please remit pajlm elllS to:

P. O. Box 9456/4
At/a li ta , Georgia 30394
Tel epholle (404) 815-6500
Fed. J.D. No. 58- 05/ J 774

ThTVOICE FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AND OTHER CHARGES

SEPTEMBER 7,2000

CHRIS STOUFFLET Client: 33253

2000 POWERS FERRY ROAD Matter: 166205
SUITE 1-8 Invoice # 10404492
MARlETT A, GA 30067

RE: CHRIS STOUFLETT-GENERAL

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES RENDERED THROUGH AUGUST 31 , 2000:

DATE I NITIALS D ESCRIPTION

08/14/2000 CEB Telephone conference with Chris Stoufflet and Laura Fenn.

08/14/2000 DGB Telephone conference with Laura Fenn regarding Federal

investigation ofRx Direct in Roanoke.

08/14/2000 LJF Conference call with C. Stoufflet and C. Bertschi; telephone

conference with D. Barger concerning government
investigation and inquiry as to client.

08/18/2000 CEB Conference with Chris Stoufflet, Laura Fenn and Buddy
Parker.

08/18/2000 LJF Meeting with C. Stoufflet, C. Bertschi and B . Parker

concerning possible criminal investigation and business
concerns.

08/18/2000 WP Conference with Mr. Stoufflet, Mr. Bertschi and Ms. Fenn.

08/22/2000 CEB Conference with Phillip Street regarding status; telephone

conference with Phyllis Granade.

08/22/2000 LJF Telephone call to R. Lucus concerning government

investigation.

08/22/2000 PFG Conference with C. Bertschi; review correspondence in

Stoufflet fi le.

Other Charges inelude a reasonable allocation of related overhead expenses .

Dlle and Payable IIpon receipt. J% interest permon/II charged 0/1 balallces after 30 days

Atlanta A uglls/a Brussels Charlotte LOl/ dOIl Miami Raleigh Stockholm Washing toll lVill stOIl-Sfllem
33253/ 166205 Page 2

DATE I NITIALS D ESCRIPTION

08/28/2000 LJF Telephone conference with R. Lucus concerning Rx Direct

and Stoufflet investigations.

08/29/2000 CEB Conference with Laura Fenn regarding her conversations

with Mr. Lucas and phamlacist.
08/29/2000 LJF Review National Association of Attorneys General
infonnatiol1 concerning treatment of internet pharmacy and
physician cites; review of memorandum from attorney
Lucas; lengthy telephone conference with B. Patayne;
memoranda concerning status and outstanding issues.

08/29/2000 PFG Conference with C. Stoufflet regarding business structure;

review correspondence regarding same.

08/30/2000 CEB Review memo from Laura Fenn regarding status.

08/30/2000 LJF Conferences with C. Bertschi and B. Parker; telephone calls

to C. Stoufflet concerning criminal risk assessment; review
of caselaw concerning distribution of controlled substances.

08/30/2000 WP Review of memorandum; conference with Ms. Fenn.

Total Fees $2,303 .50

S UMMARY H OURS RA TE/H oUR

CEB Craig E. Bertschi 2.20 250.00
DGB David G. Barger .40 250.00
LJF Laura J. Fenn 4.90 205.00
PFG Phyllis F. Granade 1.00 215.00
WP Wilmer Parker 1.40 310.00

Total Hours 9.90

OTHER CHARGES:
Long Distance Charges .38
Photocopies 11.25

Total Other Charges $ 11.63

TOTAL AMOUNT DUE THIS INVOICE $2,3 15.13

 2000 Powers Ferry Rd.
Physicians Wellness Suite 405
Marietta, Ga. 30067
Centers, Inc. 770.859.9022
Fax 770.859.9546

December 28, 2000

United Slates Drug Enforcement Agency

Chief Counsel
401 Jefferson Davis
Alexandria, Virginia 22301

Dear Sir:

I am writing this letter to request your assistance. Due to the fact that the Internet is a new field,
there have apparently been few, if any, laws enacted governing the rights of U. S. citizens to obtain
prescriptions on-line. I am in the process of writing each state medical board requesting their views on
this issue. The majority of the responses I have received indicate that they have no position at this
time.

Because of the uncertainty surrounding the issue of on-line prescriptions of medications, I am asking
for clarification concerning the laws regarding US citizens obtaining prescriptions medications (such as
Xenical, Viagra, Propecia, Phentermine, etc.) via the Internet from a licensed U.S. physician.

In particular, could you please assist me with the questions below, keeping in mind that this question
pertains only to the states that have "No Position".

• Is it legal for a licensed U.S. physician to prescribe "Phentermine" (a Controlled Substance) via
the Internet based on an on-line Medical History to a US citizen without a physical exam?
(Patients must have a 8MI of 2S% or greater and are only prescribed according to the PDR).

• What are the Federal laws regarding US citizens obtaining prescriptions over the Intemet
from a US licensed physician 7

•
The laws, nules, and regulations should be definitive and not open for interpretation. Therefore, there
should be clearly defined answers to the questions I am asking.

Thank you very much for your assistance.

040746
 December 28, 2000
• Page2
Sincerely,

Ollis StDufflet , ' ,I

qc Mel Hewitt! Attorney M:.law

Rle

Z 140 576 581

Postage $
Certified Fee

Special Delivery Fee

Restricted Delivery Fee

~ r.R;:e~tu=m:;R;:ec::ffi:;:'P::' 5"'' '.=.=ng::':;:0+-------I
..... Whom & Date Delivered
'[ Relim Receil1 Showing to Whom.
« Dare, &Addressee's Address
o
~ TOTAL Postage & Fees
?
$ ~~
§ Postmark or Date

~
~

040747
 KILPATRICK STOCKTON LLP
Please remit payments to:

P. O. Box 945614
Atlanta, Georgia 30394
Telephone (404) 815-6500
Fed. I.D. No. 58-051 J 774

INVOICE FOR PROFESSIO TAL SERVICES AND OTHER CHARGES

MARCH 20,2001

CHRISSTOUFFLET Client: 33253

2000 POWERS FERRY ROAD Matter: 254243
SrnTE 1-10 Invoice # 10448280
MARIETTA, GA 30067

RE: PHYSICIAN WELLNESS CENTERS

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES RENDERED THROUGH FEBRUARY 28,2001:

DATE INITIALS DESCRIPTION

01104/2001 PS Telephone conference with C. Bertschi regarding Internet

prescriptions.

02112/2001 CEB Review complaint against Stouffiet Enterprises on lease

agreement.

02119/2001 CEB Review complaint filed by ePrescribe and supporting

documents; review client documents; preliminary preparation :

for hearing on motion for expedited discovery.

02/2012001 CEB Review Complaint filed by ePrescribe and supporting

documents, including motion for expedited discovery,
interrogatories and document requests; prepare for meeting
with Chris Stouffiet; telephone conference with Mel Hewitt.

02/21/2001 CEB Prepare entry of appearance; prepare letter to Judge Russell;

draft affidavit for Chris Stouffiet; brief research regarding
standards for granting motion for expeditied discovery;
review client documents.

02/21/2001 LFB Arrange for filing of Notice of Appearance for Craig

Bertschi.

0212112001 RPM Courthouse run; file documents with Fulton Superior Court.

02122/2001 CEB Telephone conference with opposing counsel.

Other Charges include a reasonable allocation ofrelaled overhead expenses.

Due and Payable upon receipt. 1% interest per month charged on balances after 30 days

Atlanla Augusta Brussels Charlotte London Miami Raleigh Stockholm Washington Winston-Sa/em
 ISENBERG & HEWITT, P.C.
Attorneys at Law
Building 15, Suite 100
7000 Peachtree Dunwoody Road
Atlanta, Georgia 30328
(770) 351-4400

November 30, 2001

e-Script.md
Attn: Chris Stoufflet
2000 Powers Ferry Road
Suite 405
Marietta, Georgia 30067

General

11/1 MONTHLY RETAINER $15,000.00

11/1 Physically present @client's location approx.
10:00 a.m. - 4:00 p.m.
General review/orientation of client practices & procedures.
Meetings with client and supervisory staff. Discussions
with Lifespan rep. re: contract w/KRONOS. No Charge
11/6 Physically present @client's location approx.
10:30 a.m. - 4:15 p.m.
General review/orientation of client practices & procedures.
Meetings with client and supervisory staff. No Charge
11/8 Physically present@ client's location approx.
10:00 a.m. - 4:00 p.m.
General review/orientation of client practices & procedures.
Meetings with client and supervisory staff. No Charge
11/9 Telephone conversation/msgs. to Bill Cullum [Alabama CPA). .2hrs
11/12 Telephone conversations with Bill Cullum. Discussion with J. Klein. .6hrs
11/13 Physically present @client's location approx. No Charge
10:00 a.m. - 4:00 p.m.
General review/orientation of client practices & procedures.
Meetings with client and supervisory staff.
11/14 Research and review current Justice Deparlment opinion.
Telephone conversation with Craig Berlschie [msg-no resp).
Review initial draft of Human Resources Manual. Edit Human
Resource Manual [first 37 pages) in preliminar draft form.
Communications and review correspondence from K.P. Jones
[Jones & Wolfe] re: Domanet. Commence preliminary review
of client's web-site. Field complaint from E. Schneider
[eschneider@hvi.net] re: daughter is drug dependent/
complainl/wants Tobin's license number. Physically present
at client's facility 10:30 a.m. until 3:00 p.m.
Returned to office/meeting with TS.
Discussions with M. Hoffman office. 6.5hrs
11/15 Physically present @client's location approx. No Charge
10:30 a.m. - 4:30 p.m.
General review/orientation of client practices & procedures.
 Meetings with client and supervisory staff.
11/16 Discussions with Craig Bertschie [review all current situations). .6
11/17-11/18 Review materials [current legal trends) from CS 3.0
11/19 Correspondence to KP Jones [Domanet counsel. Florida).
Discussions with client. .6
11 /20 Physically present@ client's location approx. No Charge
11 :00 a.m. - 4:00 p.m.
General review/orientation of client practices & procedures.
Meetings with client and supervisory staff.
Prepared Infustat Prepared Infustat Agreements; discussions
wITS. @E-Scripts [12:30p -5p). Discussions with Infostat counsel.
11/21 Scan. Review and Revise Medical Web.com Supplier Agreement
to E-Scripts-md, LLC Affiliate Agreement [Draft] 1.5
Paralegal assistance @$65.00 hr. 3.0
11/22 Physically present @client's location approx. No Charge
10:00 a.m. - 6:30 p.m.
General review/orientation of client practices & procedures.
Meetings with client and supervisory staff.
11/26 Initial draff/incorporation of HR document. 4.0
Paralegal assistance @$65.00 hr. 6.0
Review Nation Board of Pharmacy materials [2.0)
Fed-X charges $31.50
11/27 Physically present@ client's location approx. No Charge
11 :00 a.m. - 4:45 p.m.
General review/orientation of client practices & procedures.
Meetings with client and supervisory staff.
IKON Doc $197.95
11 /28 Conversations with Dr. Smith. Prepare Compo Practice Mgmt.
Agmt. for Dr. Smith. Prepare file w/licenses. Run license check.
Prepare files [from computer files] of Drs. Tobin and Hollis.
Discussions with clients. @clients' facility 10-12. 3.0
11/29 Physically present@ client's location approx. No Charge
12:30 p.m. - 5.15 p.m. Discussions with TS and Gen.Mgr. w /
fechnical dept. 4.75
General review/orientation of client practices & procedures.
Meetings with client and supervisory staff.
11 /30 Physically present @client's location approx.12:30 p.m. - 5:15 p.m. No Charge
General review/orientation of client practices & procedures.
Meetings with client and supervisory staff.

SUBTOTAL: Retainer $15,000.00

- - .. _.~--

3776 24.75 $4,578.75

185.00/hr
12104/2001
Original Amt. Balance Due Discount Payment
21,170.20 21,170.20 21,170.20 9.0 $ 585.00
Check Amount 2 I.J70.20 $65.00/hr

Expenses S 229.45

$20,393.20

IP'.L~~,JT IT::D
DEC 0 4 ZOOl
BY;
 Parker, Buddy
From: Parker, Buddy
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 2:14 PM
To: Gaskins, Ralph; Bertschi, Craig; Street, Phillip
SUbject: RE: Chris Stouflett

Needless to say, I have many years of experience in prosecuting violations of 21 USC 841. the issues is not so
much the definition of "deliver" as it is "distribution", More particularly, the issue is whether e-Scripts
"possesses" (either actually or constructively) the controlled substance which is than distributed. Clearly, e-
Scripts does not have actual possession. the question thus is does it have "constructive" possession. The
answer will turn on whether the pharmacy in question, as a matter of law, is the agent of e-Scripts. When I say
"matter of law", I am referring to case law which interprets "constructive possession" vis-a-vis 21 USC 841.
The body of law turns on whether there is evidence of "domination and control" bye-Scrips over the
pharmacy. There could be a theory of "domination and control" over the pharmacy through the doctors if it can
be shown that the doctors were not exercising independent jUdgment in their prescriptions based on demands
bye-Scripts and the pharmacy knew of this collusion between e-Scripts and the doctors. The point being that
the more this looks like one business operation, the more it looks like one illegal conspiracy. Family members
owning a pharmacy is not a good idea.

-----Original Message-----
From: Gaskins, Ralph
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 1:42 PM
To: Parker, Buddy; Bertschi, Craig; Street, Phillip
Subject: FW: Chris Stouflett

Buddy/Craig: The controlled drugs that are apparently involved are Schedule III amphetamine-
like drugs used mainly for weight loss indications and testosterone.

Several thoughts:

Controlled Substances Act, 21 USC 802(8) defines "deliver" to be the-actual, constructive, or

attempted transfer of a controlled substance, \V)1~ther()r 1121- there exists an agency relationship.
This damages our concept of his role as a "facilitator" in the prescribing of the drugs, and is
substantially different from the manufacturer/distributor provision in the human growth
hormone statute we discussed a few months back.

21 USC 822(a) requires annual registration issued by the Attorney General for every person
who manufactures or distributes controlled substances. Ifhe is a distributor under this statute,
he is not registered.

21 USC 429(b) requires that prescriptions for Schedule III or IV drugs be in conformity with
503(b) of the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (requires use under the professional supervision of
a practitioner licensed to administer such a drug) - same old issue of whether the internet
questionnaire constitutes a valid basis for a prescription.

21 USC 841 makes the distribution/dispensing of controlled substances in violation of the

requirements of the Act a felony, with the exposure determined in part by the quantity of drugs
involved.

21 USC 848 can invoke the extended exposure of a continuing criminal enterprise.

I !\
~I'i,\I",J. )~I,'j
'
\I',\
\ '., I !,/'J
I
\\ I'
1 '
12/1812001 \
~ \

I'""'"
• family member operate a pharmacy, to deal with their problems with pharmacies in their
network. I do not like anything that increases their position as a disperser or distributor, and I
think this would be another bad idea.

Comments? Shall I contact him, or should we set up a meeting?

Ralph E. Gaskins, Jr., M.D.

KILPATRICK STOCKTON, LLP

1100 Peachtree Street

Suite 2800
Atlanta, Georgia 30309-4530 USA
Direct Telephone: 404.745.2486
Main Telephone: 404.815.6500
Fax: 404.815.6555
E-mail: REGaskins@KilpatrickStockton.com

This e-mail is intended for the use of the addressee(s) only, and may contain privileged, confidential, or
proprietary information and/or attorney/client communication that is exempt from disclosure under law. If
you have received this message in error, please inform us promptly by reply e-mail, and then delete the
e-mail and destroy any printed copy. Thank you.

-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Stoufflet [mailto:cstoufflet@mindspring.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 200111:37 AM
To: Gaskins, Ralph
Cc: Parker, Buddy; Bertschi, Craig; Troy Sobert; Erin Riggins
Subject: Re: Your recent inquiry
Thank you for your reply.

eScripts physicians prescribe Phentermine, Adipex, Bontril, Didrex, and Meridia for weight loss.

The LifeSpan physicians prescribe testosterone but lab work is mandatory. Patients must present a photo ID when
having the lab work performed.

There are no other controlled medications prescribed. Is this a question that Mr. Froelich is more familiar with
since he has been working with USAPrescription.com and have meetings with Federal organizations in
Washington on many of these issues?

Please also let us know about the pharmacy ownership.

Thank you again for your time.

-Chris

----- Original Message -----

From: Gaskins, Ralph
To: Chris Stoufflet (E-mail)
Cc: parker, Buddy; Bertschi, Craig
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 11 :11 AM
Subject: Your recent inquiry

Chris: I have been over the DEA pages that you recently sent me. I am
afraid that I see very little that helps us in this material. These
guidelines set forth the government's position as to what constitutes a

12/18/2001

1--
Bradbury, Jackee Rae

From: Shuren, Allison

Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 7:16 PM
To: Peters, Jeff; Pavel, Tony; Hutcherson, Carolyn
Cc: Waters, Robert
Subject: e-scripts-MD

Hi,

As I think you all know, we have been given the green light bye-Scripts to undertake a number
of projects. One of them entails the state research on laws/regulations impacting the
prescribing of medications via the Internet. This includes, at a minimum, research of the
medical practice acts and the pharmacy laws/regs and follow-up calls to the respective boards.

Bob/Tony/Carolyn have you started to see any type of restrictive laws/regs in state consumer
protection or mini-FTC acts directed to on-line prescribing such that we will need to be
investigating this area as well ??

If possible, I would like to get together Friday morning (maybe at 10 if that works for
everybody) so we can devise a strategy for completing the first 14 states the e-Scripts GC has
asked us to analyze first and to agree upon a standard write-up format so we can keep the final
format-type editing to a minimum. Would you let me know if 10 works for you.

Thanks -- Allison

1
Matelski, Wayne H.

From: Shuren, Allison

Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 20024:23 PM
To: Matelski, Wayne H.
Subject: e-Scripts

Hi Wayne,

I received the investigative report and other notes re: the FDA visit to e-Scripts. May I
forward a copy for you to review and provide your thoughts as to the level of risk the company
faces and whether you believe the company should be taking action other than waiting?

Thank you
Allison

Allison Weber Shuren, M.S.N., J.D.

Arent Fox Kintner Plotkin & Kahn
1050 Connecticut Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20036-5339
tel: 202/775-5712
fax: 202/857-6395

1
 ......

• 11, Arent Fox

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

MEMORANDUM

TO: Robert J. Waters

Allison W. Shuren

FROM: HowardJ. Young

RE: e-Scripts-md.com Contracts

DATE: April 25, 2002

Listed below are questions and comments with respect to certain paragraphs in the attached e-
scripts-md.com contracts.

Patient Responsibility Statement:

Paragraph 3: Is this necessary, what purpose does this serve?

Paragraph 4: e-scripts may not want to contact the same local doctor. Do you agree? This
paragraph is also redundant with Paragraph II.

Paragraph 6: Bob - Should we note that the information on the e-scripts website was
developed by licensed physicians?

Paragraph 9: Reference to "the clinic." What clinic?

Paragraph 13: I would delete this paragraph altogether. Paragraph 6 requires them to review
risks and contraindications. Would self-monitoring blood pressure realistic?
Consider limiting reference to blood pressure monitoring to specified
medications only.

Consider additional paragraph attached to Patient Responsibility Statement.

Paragraph 14: This is redundant with new paragraph 19 and I believe unnecessary.

Informed Consent Waiver Form:

Should we advise changing the name ofthe "Medical History Questionnaire" to "Medical History
and Physical Condition Questionnaire?"

Paragraph 3: Are there any "out of country" customers?

Paragraph 11: Should reference to "agent" be deleted? It could be argued either way.

Paragraph 17: I question whether we should include this paragraph.

.11, Arent Fox
ATTORNEYS AT LAW

Paragraph 24: This paragraph triggers 42 CFR Part 2. Do they need drug and alcohol
information~
,
/
Paragraph 25: I would consider deleting this provision.

-2-
Waters, Robert

From: Shuren, Allison

Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 1:57 PM
To: Peters, Jeff; Pavel, Tony; Hutcherson, Carolyn
Cc: Waters, Robert
Subject: e-Scripts format

Hi,

After combining all our various styles in preparing the state-by-state memos -- here is a
template. Where there is relevant statutory or regulatory language include it in whichever
section its fits (i.e., Practice of Medicine or Practice of Pharmacy). As far as assigning a level
of risk to each state, for now use the following scale: High Risk = the state BaM or AG has a
policy, a statement, statutory language, or regulatory language, a board opinion, and AG opinion..
.(something tangible) that sets forth a position in opposition to online prescribing; Medium Risk
= nothing specific from the board or AG but your discussion with the BaM or the language in
the practice act suggest a potential issue or ambiguous enough that it could be problematic; or
Low Risk = BaM suggests not a problem or not addressing the issue. This is just a benchmark,
use your best judgment. If you not sure or your findings are ambiguous we should discuss with
Bob.

Thank you
Allison

Mississippi
5-14-02.doc

1
Re: Info I gave to Arnet Fox
Saturday, June 21, 2008
5:57 PM

Subject
Re: Info I gave to Arnet Fox
From Chri s Stoufflet
To 'Pa rker, Buddy'
Sent Wednesday, Ma y 22, 2002 5:16 PM

Thank you Mr. Parker. I will keep you posted on everything.

Did you deicide on an attorney for Dr. Hollis? Troy will be sending you the info on all of the physicians
and the employees. Please call or email me if you need me.

Thanks,
-Chris
----- Original Message -----
From: Parker, Buddy
To: 'Chris Stoufflet'
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 4:44 PM
Subject: RE: Info I gave to Arnet Fox
Thanks. They have called and I have told them about the "stepped up " efforts of the US Attorney's
office, including Chartash getting into the case. They were already aware of the subpoena. I told them I
had no problem with them assisting you in future endeavors; however, I warned them not to contact the
US Attorney's Office without clearing matters with me. They assured me they would not take such
action. I told them that we expected to be able to talk with the US Attorney's Office before they took any
action and that we may be able to prevent any indictment. I told them that we are tracking o number of
other cases that the Department Of Justice has brought in this area and we believed that you have some
viable defenses. They have assured me that they would keep me informed. You also need to keep me
informed. The summer may get hotter than normal and you and I need to be working together. Thanks
for you confidence. Buddy
-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Stoufflet [mailto:c.stoufflet@e-scripts-md.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 4:24 PM
To: bparker@KilpatrickStockton.com
Subject: Info I gave to Arnet Fox

Great to see you today.

I wanted you to know that I didn't say anything to the people at Arnet Fox about the conversation
Mr. Froelich had with the gentlemen from the AUSA office. I was very "vague" about our
conversation this morning. I told them that we were informed that they are efforts to step up
enforcement in this industry and we are a big target.

Thank you,
-Chris

Important Page 1
 PENDING AND ON-GOING LEGAL

Litigation Matters
Copyright Case (MedScripts) [all briefs are in, waiting judgment on Motion to Transfer]
Dr. Valaraja (Chris Personal) [awaiting discovery responses]
Town Lake Paints (Troy Personal) [jury trial pushed forward to March]
Spam case in Utah (result from affiliate) [drafting Motion for Summary Judgment]
.}Ciaeent e9f1yrigh!- matter (waiting to hear about sending demand letter/drafting
Complaint)

Pending Contracts
~(il!e Antlel S6B ~ign final contract)
M:[ff Watson (Awaiting term approval from Chris)
.---Martin
Planet-Rx matter (Chris is handling)
Drafting VWN Affiliate Software License **Suite G-l
PortaScripts contracts **Wgrker's comp ISines

Intellectual Property Matters

Office Action Responses/Conflicts:
MyEmd.com
The Missing Link in Healthcare
CopyrightlTrademark maintenance
Affiliate Infringement

Corporate Structure
Service Agreements
License Agreements
Business Licenses
Operating Agreements
G & A Agreements
General Corporate Governance
Monitor Corporate Structure
Monitor outstanding licenses/fees (update minute books)
Annual Renewal Fee

On-goinglDaily
Paul Diemer (only sent $100 this month)
Daily Call Center problem resolution/counseling
Daily Affiliate Program problem resolution/counseling
Daily Corporate problem resolution/counseling
Human Resource problem resolution/counseling
Monitor Legal Compliance of Company's ProcedureslEmployment Law Matters
Assist Buddy ParkerlTom Beaver when necessary
Monitor Legal Bills (Arent Fox/Seyfarth ShawlIsenberg & Hewitt/local counsels)
Monitor compliance of all current-term contracts/agreements/licenses
Personal matters for ChrislTroylErin as arise
Review and update local, state, and federal laws governing industry (on-going monitoring)

l
 MEMORANDUM

TRAUB & ASSOCIATES, LLC

2000 POWERS FERRY ROAD, SUITE 2 -lA
ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30067
770-980-9004
fax: 770-980-0622

July 2, 2002

To: Chris Stoufflet

From: M. Darren Traub

Subj: Telephone Conference With Arent Fox

Today, as requested, I had a telephone conference with Allison Shuren at Arent Fox
regarding some on-going concerns at Virtual Wellness Network..

• We discussed the closing of LifeSpan. Arent Fox was pleased with the steps that we
have taken and wanted to make sure that the closing language was in fact on the LifeSpan
website. They are going to research the law regarding whether Dr. Hollis can cancel all
of his written prescriptions that have renewal periods so that no patient can renew his
prescription.

• Arent Fox is continuing with the 50 state survey. They would like to know if you have a
preference for the next states, or should they just randomly pick some.

• Apparently, Arent Fox sent a bill for e-Scripts to Isenberg & Hewitt in the amount of
$800. Although Mel told them to just deduct the $800 from the retainer on file with
Arent Fox, they are unable to do so without your written permission. If this is ok with
you, please write a letter to Allison Shuren on e-Scripts/VWN letterhead stating that this
is ok.

• Arent Fox would like a final written proposal of the new Porta Scripts business model so
that they can "bless" it. Apparently, depending on the state, their may be a need for a
licensed RN as opposed to merely a medical technician. Once the understand the final
business model, they can begin this research.