BOOK ONE CRIMINAL LAW - that branch or division of law which defines crimes, treats of their nature and provides for their punishment. CHARACTERISTICS OF CRIMINAL LAW 1. GENERAL - it is binding on all persons who live or sojourn in the Philippine territory (Art. 14, !!" EXCEPTIONS: a" #reaty stipulations b" $aws of preferential application c" Principles of Public %nternational $aw. The following persons are exempted: a. &overeigns and other chief of state b. Ambassadors,ministers, plenipotentiary, minister resident and charges d'affaires. !onsuls, vice-consuls and other commercial representatives of foreign nation cannot claim the privileges and immunities accorded to ambassadors and ministers. 2. TERRITORIAL penal laws of the Philippines are enforceable only within its territory. EXCEPTIONS: (Art. (, )P!" i.e., enforceable even outside Philippine territory. 1" *ffense committed while on a Philippine ship or airship (" +orging or counterfeiting any coin or currency note of the Philippines or obligations and securities issued by the ,overnment. 3) %ntroduction into the country of the above-mentioned obligations and securities. 4" -hile being public officers or employees should commit an offense in the e.ercise of their functions. /" &hould commit any of the crimes against national security and the law of nations defined in #itle *ne of 0oo1 #wo. EXCEPTION TO THE EXCEPTION: Penal laws not applicable within or without Philippine territory if so provided in treaties and laws of preferential application. (Art.(, )P!" 2. PROSPECTIVE GENERAL RULE3 Penal laws cannot ma1e an act punishable in a manner in which it was not punishable when committed. EXCEPTION: (it may be applied retroactively" -hen the new law is favorable to the accused. EXCEPTION TO THE EXCEPTION a" #he new law is e.pressly made inapplicable to pending actions or e.isting causes of actions. b" *ffender is a habitual criminal.
LIMITATIONS ON THE POWER OF CONGRESS TO ENACT PENAL LAWS: 1. o e. post facto law shall be enacted (. o bill of attainder shall be enacted 2. o law that violates e4ual protection clause of the constitution shall be enacted 4. o law which imposes cruel and unusual punishments nor e.cessive fines shall be enacted. THEORIES IN CRIMINAL LAW 1. !lassical #heory - basis of criminal liability is human free will. 5nder this theory, the purpose of penalty is retribution. #he )P! is generally governed by this theory. 2. Positivist #heory 6 basis of criminal liability is the sum of the social and economic phenomena to which the actor is e.posed wherein prevention and correction is the purpose of penalty. #his theory is e.emplified in the provisions regarding impossible crimes and habitual delin4uency. CRIMINAL LAW COMMITTEE CHAIRPERSON: Mark David Martinez EDP: Elaine Masukat ASSISTANTS: Catherine Danao, Alert Rodri!uez, Claro Re!ino Sa"#a!a, $izelle %ou Caahu!, Mar& 'aren (uizon, %eo San )uan, Ma* +i,toria -a"ao, R&an %ita, .a&ani .rillante, )r* 2 2005 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS
3. 7clectic or 8i.ed #heory 6 combination of positivist and classical thin1ing wherein crimes that are economic and social in nature should be dealt in a positive manner9 thus, the law is more compassionate. PRELIMINARY TITLE ART. 2 APPLICATION OF ITS PROVISIONS RULES ON VESSELS: 1." Philippine vessel or aircraft. 8ust be understood as that which is registered in the Philippine 0ureau of !ustoms. (." *n +oreign 8erchant :essels ENGLISH RULE: !rimes committed aboard a vessel within the territorial waters of a country are r!a"#e in the courts of such country. 7;!7P#%*3 -hen the crimes merely affect things within the vessel or when they only refer to the internal management thereof. FRENCH RULE: ,77)A$ )5$73 !rimes committed aboard vessel within the territorial waters of a country are $% r!a"#e in the courts of said country. 7;!7P#%*3 -hen their commission affects the peace and security of the territory or when the safety of the state is endangered. %n the Philippines, we follow the 7nglish )ule. %n the case of a foreign warship, the same is not subject to territorial laws. TITLE ONE: FELONIES AN& CIRCUMSTANCES WHICH AFFECT CRIMINAL LIABILITY C'a(er O$e: Fe#%$!e) *Ar). +-,-. ART. + FELONIES Fe#%$!e) 6 are acts or omissions punishable by the )P!. ELEMENTS OF FELONIES *GENERAL. 1. there must be an act or omission ie, there must be e.ternal acts. (. the act or omission must be punishable by the )P!. 2. the act is performed or the omission incurred by means of dolo or culpa. /NULLUM CRIMEN0 NULLA POENA SINE LEGE1 - there is no crime where there is no law punishing it. CLASSIFICATION OF FELONIES ACCOR&ING TO THE MEANS BY WHICH THEY ARE COMMITTE&: 1. I$e$!%$a# Fe#%$!e) the act is performed with deliberate intent or malice. Re23!)!e) %4 &OLO %r MALICE3 a. +reedom b. %ntelligence c. !riminal %ntent M!)a5e %4 Fa6 6 is a misapprehension of fact on the part of the person causing injury to another. &uch person is not criminally liable as he acted without criminal intent. Re23!)!e) %4 7!)a5e %4 4a6 a) a 8e4e$)e: a. #hat the act done would have been lawful had the facts been as the accused believed them to be. b. #hat the intention of the accused in performing the act should be lawful. c. #hat the mista1e must be without fault or carelessness on the part of the accused. 2. C3#(a"#e Fe#%$!e) - performed without malice. Re23!)!e) %4 CULPA: a. +reedom b. %ntelligence c. egligence and %mprudence 2005 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS EEC!TI"E COMMITTEE AND S!B#ECT C$AIRPERSONS Ma%&'el A(a%en)o* /Over0all Chair#erson1, Ronald #al+an,a% /Over0all +i,e Chair1, Yolanda Tolen)&no/+C0A,ads1, )enn&fe% Ang/+C0 Se,retariat1, #o- Ind.')&/o /+C02inan,e1, Ela&ne Ma*.0a) /+C0 EDP1, Anna Ma%ga%&)a E%e* /+C0%o!isti,s1 #ona)1an Mang.nda-ao /Politi,al %a31, 2%an'&* Bened&') Reo).)a% /%aor %a31, Ro+.ald Pad&lla /Civil %a31, C1a%+a&ne To%%e* /Ta4ation %a31, Ma%0 Da/&d Ma%)&ne, /Cri"inal %a31, 3a%n- L.&*a Aleg%e /Co""er,ial %a31, #&n0- Ann !- /Re"edial %a31, #a'0&e Lo. Ba.)&*)a /%e!al Ethi,s1 San Beda College of Law 4 MEMORY AID IN CRIMINAL LAW )7A&* +*) P5&<%, A!#& *+ 7,$%,7!73 A man must use common sense and e.ercise due reflection in all his acts9 it is his duty to be cautious, careful and prudent. Ma#a Pr%'!"!a - the class of crimes punishable by &P7!%A$ $A-& and where criminal intent is not, as a rule, necessary, it being sufficient that the offender has the intent to perpetrate the act prohibited by the special law. MALA IN SE 9). MALA PROHIBITA MALA IN SE MALA PROHIBITA 1. As to moral trait of the offender #he moral trait is considered. $iability will arise only when there is dolo or culpa. #he moral trait of the offender is not considered. %t is enough that the prohibited act was voluntarily done. (. As to use of good faith as a defense ,ood faith or lac1 of criminal intent is a valid defense9 unless the crime is the result of culpa. ,ood faith is not a defense. 2. As to degree of accom- plish- ment of the crime #he degree of accomplishment of the crime is ta1en into account in punishing the offender. #he act gives rise to a crime only when it is consummated. 4. As to mitigati ng and aggravat ing circum- stances 8itigating and aggravating circumstances are ta1en into account in imposing the penalty. 8itigating and aggravating circumstances are generally not ta1en into account. /. As to degree of partici- pation -hen there is more than one offender, the degree of participation of each in the commission of the crime is ta1en into account. =egree of participation is generally not ta1en into account. All who participated in the act are punished to the same e.tent. >. As to what laws are violated :iolation of the )P! (,eneral rule" :iolation of &pecial $aws (,eneral rule" I$e$ 8!)!$:3!)'e8 4r%7 M%!9e INTENT MOTIVE 1. %s the purpose to use a particular means to effect such result 1. %s the moving power which impels one to act (. %s an element of the crime, e.cept in unintentional felonies (culpable" (. %s *# an element of the crime 2. %s essential in intentional felonies 2. %s essential only when the identity of the perpetrator is in doubt ART. ; CRIMINAL LIABILITY PAR. , - Cr!7!$a# L!a"!#!< 4%r a 4e#%$< 8!44ere$ 4r%7 'a !$e$8e8 % "e 6%77!e8 RE=UISITES: a" #hat an intentional felony has been committed. b" #hat the wrong done to the aggrieved party be the direct, natural and logical conse4uence of the felony committed. PROXIMATE CAUSE 6 that cause, which, in the natural and continuous se4uence, unbro1en by any efficient intervening cause, produces the injury without which the result would not have occurred. T'3)0 'e (er)%$ !) )!## 6r!7!$a##< #!a"#e !$: 1. 7rror in personae- mista1e in the identity of the victim. (. Abberatio ictus 6 mista1e in the blow. CRIMINAL LAW COMMITTEE CHAIRPERSON: Mark David Martinez EDP: Elaine Masukat ASSISTANTS: Catherine Danao, Alert Rodri!uez, Claro Re!ino Sa"#a!a, $izelle %ou Caahu!, Mar& 'aren (uizon, %eo San )uan, Ma* +i,toria -a"ao, R&an %ita, .a&ani .rillante, )r* 5 2005 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS
2. Praeter intentionem 6 lac1 of intent to commit so grave a wrong. PAR. 2 *IMPOSSIBLE CRIME. RE=UISITES: a" #hat the act performed would be an offense against persons or property. b" #hat the act was done with evil intent. c" #hat its accomplishment is inherently impossible, or that the means employed is either inade4uate or ineffectual. d" #hat the act performed should not constitute a violation of another provision of the )P!. ART. > CONSUMMATE&0 FRUSTRATE& ? ATTEMPTE& FELONIES STAGES OF EXECUTION: CONSUMMATE& FELONY -hen all the elements necessary for its e.ecution and accomplishment are present. 1. FRUSTRATE& FELONY ELEMENTS: a" #he offender performs all the acts of e.ecution. b" All the acts performed would produce the felony as a conse4uence. c" 0ut the felony is not produced. d" 0y the reason of causes independent of the will of the perpetrator. WHAT CRIMES &O NOT A&MIT OF FRUSTRATE& STAGE@ 1" )ape (" 0ribery 2" !orruption of Public *fficers 4" Adultery /" Physical %njury (. ATTEMPTE& FELONY ELEMENTS: a" #he offender commences the commission of the felony directly by overt acts. b" <e does not perform all the acts of e.ecution which should produce the felony. c) #he offender's acts are not stopped by his own spontaneous desistance. &ESISTANCE - is an absolutory cause which negates criminal liability because the law encourages a person to desist from committing a crime. - this is applicable only in the attempted stage. OVERT ACTS 6 &ome physical activity or deed, indicating intention to commit a particular crime, more than a mere planning or preparation, which if carried to its complete termination following its natural course, without being frustrated by e.ternal obstacles, nor by voluntary desistance of the perpetrator will logically ripen into a concrete offense. IN&ETERMINATE OFFENSE3 *ne where the purpose of the offender in performing an act is not certain. #he accused maybe convicted for a felony defined by the acts performed by him up to the time of desistance. 2 STAGES IN THE &EVELOPMENT OF A CRIME: 1" %nternal acts &uch as mere ideas in the mind of person. ot punishable. (" 7.ternal acts cover3 a) Preparatory acts - ordinarily not punished e.cept when considered by law as independent crimes (e.g. Art. 2?4, Possession of pic1loc1s and similar tools" b" Acts of 7.ecution - punishable under the )P! ART. A LIGHT FELONIES $ight +elonies are punishable only when they have been consummated 7;!7P#3 %f committed against persons or property, punishable even if not consummated. 2005 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS EEC!TI"E COMMITTEE AND S!B#ECT C$AIRPERSONS Ma%&'el A(a%en)o* /Over0all Chair#erson1, Ronald #al+an,a% /Over0all +i,e Chair1, Yolanda Tolen)&no/+C0A,ads1, )enn&fe% Ang/+C0 Se,retariat1, #o- Ind.')&/o /+C02inan,e1, Ela&ne Ma*.0a) /+C0 EDP1, Anna Ma%ga%&)a E%e* /+C0%o!isti,s1 #ona)1an Mang.nda-ao /Politi,al %a31, 2%an'&* Bened&') Reo).)a% /%aor %a31, Ro+.ald Pad&lla /Civil %a31, C1a%+a&ne To%%e* /Ta4ation %a31, Ma%0 Da/&d Ma%)&ne, /Cri"inal %a31, 3a%n- L.&*a Aleg%e /Co""er,ial %a31, #&n0- Ann !- /Re"edial %a31, #a'0&e Lo. Ba.)&*)a /%e!al Ethi,s1 San Beda College of Law 5 MEMORY AID IN CRIMINAL LAW *nly principals and accomplices are liable, accessories are not liable even if committed against persons or property. ART. B CONSPIRACY AN& PROPOSAL TO COMMIT FELONY RE=UISITES OF CONSPIRACY 1. #hat ( or more persons came to an agreement. (. #hat the agreement pertains to the commission of a felony. 2. #hat the e.ecution of the felony was decided upon. 2 CONCEPTS OF CONSPIRACY 1. !onspiracy as a crime by itself. 7;A8P$73 conspiracy to commit rebellion or insurrection, treason, sedition. (. !onspiracy as a means of committing a crime a) #here is a previous and express agreement9 b) #he participants acted in concert or simultaneously which is indicative of a meeting of the minds towards a common criminal objective. #here is an implied agreement. GENERAL RULE3 8ere conspiracy or proposal to commit a felony is not punishable since they are only preparatory acts EXCEPTION: in cases in which the law specially provides a penalty therefor, such as in treason, coup detat, and rebellion or insurrection /T'e a6 %4 %$e !) 'e a6 %4 a##1 GENERAL RULE: -hen conspiracy is established, all who participated therein, irrespective of the 4uantity or 4uality of his participation is liable e4ually, whether conspiracy is pre- planned or instantaneous. EXCEPTION: 5nless one or some of the conspirators committed some other crime which is not part of the intended crime. EXCEPTION TO THE EXCEPTION: -hen the act constitutes a @single indivisible offenseA. !onspiracy may be inferred when two or more persons proceed to perform overt acts towards the accomplishment of the same felonious objective, with each doing his act, so that their acts though seemingly independent were in fact connected, showing a common design. #hese overt acts must consist of3 - active participation in the actual commission of the crime itself, or - moral assistance to his co- conspirators by being present at the time of the commission of the crime, or - e.erting a moral ascendance over the other co-conspirators by moving them to e.ecute or implement the criminal plan (PEOPLE vs. A!T" et al." #$ %o. &'()*&" April +," +**'- RE=UISITES OF PROPOSAL: 1. #hat a person has decided to commit a felony9 and 2. #hat he proposes its execution to some other person or persons. ART. C CLASSIFICATION OF FELONIES ACCOR&ING TO GRAVITY I7(%ra$6e %4 C#a))!4!6a!%$ 1. #o determine whether these felonies can be comple.ed or not. (. #o determine the prescription of the crime and the prescription of the penalty. Gra9e 4e#%$!e) 6 are those to which the law attaches the capital punishment or penalties which in any of their periods are afflictive, in accordance with Art. (/ of the !ode. Le)) :ra9e 4e#%$!e) 6 are those which the law punishes with penalties which in their ma.imum period are correctional, in accordance with Art. (/ of the !ode. L!:' 4e#%$!e) 6 are those infractions of law for the commission of which the CRIMINAL LAW COMMITTEE CHAIRPERSON: Mark David Martinez EDP: Elaine Masukat ASSISTANTS: Catherine Danao, Alert Rodri!uez, Claro Re!ino Sa"#a!a, $izelle %ou Caahu!, Mar& 'aren (uizon, %eo San )uan, Ma* +i,toria -a"ao, R&an %ita, .a&ani .rillante, )r* 6 2005 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS
penalty of arresto menor or a fine not e.ceeding (?? pesos, or both, is provided. ART. ,- OFFENSES NOT SUBDECT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE RPC GENERAL RULE: )P! provisions are supplementary to special laws. EXCEPTION: 1. -here the special law provides otherwise9 and (. -hen the provisions of the )P! are impossible of application, either by e.press provision or by necessary implication. #hus, when the special law adopts the penalties imposed in the )P!, such as reclusi.n perpetua or reclusi.n temporal, the provisions of the )P! on imposition of penalties based on stage of e.ecution, degree of participation, and attendance of mitigating and aggravating circumstances may be applied by necessary implication. C'a(er TE%: D3)!4<!$: C!r637)a$6e) a$8 C!r637)a$6e) W'!6' EFe7( 4r%7 Cr!7!$a# L!a"!#!< *Ar). ,,-,2.
ART. ,,. DUSTIFYING CIRCUMSTANCES DUSTIFYING CIRCUMSTANCES 6 are those where the act of a person is said to be in accordance with law, so that such person is deemed not to have transgressed the law and is free from both criminal and civil liability. #here is no civil liability, e.cept in par. 4 of Art. 11, where the civil liability is borne by the persons benefited by the act. ,. SELF- &EFENSE RE=UISITES: a) !nlawful aggression (condition sine 4ua non"9 b) $easona/le necessit0 of the means employed to prevent or repel it9 and c) Lac1 of sufficient provocation on the part of the person defending himself. UNLAWFUL AGGRESSION - is e4uivalent to an actual physical assault or, at least - threatened assault of an immediate and imminent 1ind which is offensive and positively strong, showing the wrongful intent to cause injury. TEST OF REASONABLENESS the means employed depends upon the nature and 4uality of the (1" weapon used by the aggressor, and ((" his physical condition, character, siBe and other circumstances, (2" and those of the person defending himself, (4" and also the place and occasion of the assault. Perfect e4uality between the weapons used by the one defending himself and that of the aggressor is not re4uired, nor material commensurability between the means of attac1 and defense. )7A&*3 0ecause the person assaulted does not have sufficient tran4uility of mind to thin1 and to calculate. R!:') !$6#38e8 !$ )e#4-8e4e$)e: &elf-defense includes not only the defense of the person or body of the one assaulted but also that of his rights, the enjoyment of which is protected by law. #hus, it includes3 1. #he right to honor. <ence, a slap on the face is considered as unlawful aggression directed against the honor of the actor (People vs. 2a/io" &3 24$A 3*&-. 2. #he defense of property rights, only if there is also an actual and imminent danger on the person of the one defending ( People vs %arvae5" &+& 24$A '63-. 2005 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS EEC!TI"E COMMITTEE AND S!B#ECT C$AIRPERSONS Ma%&'el A(a%en)o* /Over0all Chair#erson1, Ronald #al+an,a% /Over0all +i,e Chair1, Yolanda Tolen)&no/+C0A,ads1, )enn&fe% Ang/+C0 Se,retariat1, #o- Ind.')&/o /+C02inan,e1, Ela&ne Ma*.0a) /+C0 EDP1, Anna Ma%ga%&)a E%e* /+C0%o!isti,s1 #ona)1an Mang.nda-ao /Politi,al %a31, 2%an'&* Bened&') Reo).)a% /%aor %a31, Ro+.ald Pad&lla /Civil %a31, C1a%+a&ne To%%e* /Ta4ation %a31, Ma%0 Da/&d Ma%)&ne, /Cri"inal %a31, 3a%n- L.&*a Aleg%e /Co""er,ial %a31, #&n0- Ann !- /Re"edial %a31, #a'0&e Lo. Ba.)&*)a /%e!al Ethi,s1 San Beda College of Law 7 MEMORY AID IN CRIMINAL LAW /Sa$8 :r%3$8 E'e$ !$ 'e r!:'1 - the law does not re4uire a person to retreat when his assailant is rapidly advancing upon him with a deadly weapon. 5nder Re(3"#!6 A6 C2>2, 1nown as the A$!- V!%#e$6e a:a!$) W%7e$ a$8 'e!r C'!#8re$ A6 %4 2--;3 :ictim-survivors who are found by the courts to be suffering from 0attered -oman &yndrome do not incur an0 criminal or civil lia/ilit0 notwithstanding the absence of any of the elements for justifying circumstances of self-defense under the )P!. (2ec. +)" $.A. %o. 3+)+- #he law provides for an additional justifying circumstance. 0attered -oman &yndrome 6 refers to a scientifically defined pattern of psychological and behavioral symptoms found in women living in battering relationships as a result of cumulative abuse. 0attery 6 refers to any act of inflicting physical harm upon the woman or her child resulting to physical and psychological or emotional distress. 2. &EFENSE OF RELATIVES RE=UISITES: 1. 5nlawful Aggression9 (. )easonable necessity of the means employed to prevent or repel it9 and 2. %n case the provocation was given by the person attac1ed, the one ma1ing the defense had no part therein. RELATIVES THAT CAN BE &EFEN&E&: 1. &pouse (. Ascendants 2. =escendants 4. $egitimate, natural or adopted brothers and sisters, or relatives by affinity in the same degrees. /. )elatives by consanguinity within the fourth civil degree. +. &EFENSE OF STRANGER RE=UISITES: 1. 5nlawful Aggression9 (. )easonable necessity of the means employed to prevent or repel it9 and 2. #he person defending be not induced by revenge, resentment or other evil motive. ;. AVOI&ANCE OF GREATER EVIL OR INDURY RE=UISITES: 1. #hat the evil sought to be avoided actually e.ists3 (. #hat the injury feared be greater than that done to avoid it9 and 2. #here be no other practical and less harmful means of preventing it. o civil liability e.cept when there is another person benefited in which case the latter is the one liable. ,reater evil must not be brought about by the negligence or imprudence or violation of law by the actor. G. FULFILLMENT OF &UTYH OR LAWFUL EXERCISE OF RIGHT OR OFFICE. RE=UISITES: 1. #hat the accused acted in the performance of a duty or in the lawful e.ercise of a right or office9 (. #hat the injury caused or the offense committed be the necessary conse4uence of the due performance of duty or the lawful e.ercise of such right or office. >. OBE&IENCE TO AN OR&ER ISSUE& FOR SOME LAWFUL PURPOSE. RE=UISITES: 1. #hat an order has been issued by a superior. (. #hat such order must be for some lawful purpose 2. #hat the means used by the subordinate to carry out said order is lawful. &ubordinate is not liable for carrying out an illegal order if he is not aware CRIMINAL LAW COMMITTEE CHAIRPERSON: Mark David Martinez EDP: Elaine Masukat ASSISTANTS: Catherine Danao, Alert Rodri!uez, Claro Re!ino Sa"#a!a, $izelle %ou Caahu!, Mar& 'aren (uizon, %eo San )uan, Ma* +i,toria -a"ao, R&an %ita, .a&ani .rillante, )r* 8 2005 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS
of its illegality and he is not negligent. ART. ,2. EXEMPTING CIRCUMSTANCES EFe7(!$: C!r637)a$6e) *%r 'e 6!r637)a$6e) 4%r $%$-!7(3a"!#!<. are those grounds for e.emption from punishment, because there is wanting in the agent of the crime any of the conditions which ma1es the act voluntary, or negligent. BASIS: #he e.emption from punishment is based on the complete absence of intelligence, freedom of action, or intent, or on the absence of negligence on the part of the accused. DUSTIFYING CIRCUMSTANCE EXEMPTING CIRCUMSTANCE 1. %t affects the act not the actor. 1. %t affects the actor not the act. (. #he act is considered to have been done within the bounds of law9 hence, legitimate and lawful in the eyes of the law. (. #he act complained of is actually wrongful, but the actor is not liable. 2. &ince the act is considered lawful, there is no crime. 2. &ince the act complained of is actually wrong there is a crime but since the actor acted without voluntariness, there is no dolo nor culpa 4. &ince there is no crime, nor a criminal, there is also no criminal or civil liability. (e.cept Art. 11, par. 4" 4. &ince there is a crime committed though there is no criminal, there is civil liability. ,. IMBECILITY OR INSANITY Insanity or imbecility e.ists when there is a complete deprivation of intelligence or freedom of the will. An insane person is not so e.empt if it can be shown that he acted during a lucid interval. 0ut an imbecile is e.empt in all cases from criminal liability. TWO TESTS OF INSANITY: 1. #est of !*,%#%* 6 complete deprivation of intelligence in committing the crime. (. #est of :*$%#%* 6 total deprivation of freedom of will. #he defense must prove that the accused was insane at the time of the commission of the crime because the presumption is always in favor of sanity. %nsanity e.ists when there is a complete deprivation of intelligence in committing the act. 8ere abnormality of the mental faculties will not e.clude imputability. #he accused must be Cso insane as to be incapable of entertaining criminal intent.C <e must be deprived of reason and acting without the least discernment because there is a complete absence of the power to discern or a total deprivation of freedom of the will. (PEOPLE vs. A%TO%7O" #$ %o. &,,+))" %ovem/er +(" +**+- 2. PERSON UN&ER NINE YEARS OF AGE An infant under the age of nine years is absolutely and conclusively presumed to be incapable of committing a crime. #he phrase @under nine yearsA should be construed @nine years or lessA +. PERSON OVER NINE YEARS OF AGE AN& UN&ER ,G ACTING WITHOUT &ISCERNMENT. 8ust have acted without discernment. &ISCERNMENT 6 mental capacity to fully appreciate the conse4uences of an unlawful act. &!)6er$7e$ 7a<"e )'%E$ "<: 2005 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS EEC!TI"E COMMITTEE AND S!B#ECT C$AIRPERSONS Ma%&'el A(a%en)o* /Over0all Chair#erson1, Ronald #al+an,a% /Over0all +i,e Chair1, Yolanda Tolen)&no/+C0A,ads1, )enn&fe% Ang/+C0 Se,retariat1, #o- Ind.')&/o /+C02inan,e1, Ela&ne Ma*.0a) /+C0 EDP1, Anna Ma%ga%&)a E%e* /+C0%o!isti,s1 #ona)1an Mang.nda-ao /Politi,al %a31, 2%an'&* Bened&') Reo).)a% /%aor %a31, Ro+.ald Pad&lla /Civil %a31, C1a%+a&ne To%%e* /Ta4ation %a31, Ma%0 Da/&d Ma%)&ne, /Cri"inal %a31, 3a%n- L.&*a Aleg%e /Co""er,ial %a31, #&n0- Ann !- /Re"edial %a31, #a'0&e Lo. Ba.)&*)a /%e!al Ethi,s1 San Beda College of Law 9 MEMORY AID IN CRIMINAL LAW a" #he manner the crime was committed3 or b" #he conduct of the offender after its commission. ;. ACCI&ENT WITHOUT FAULT OR INTENTION OF CAUSING IT 0asis3 $ac1 of negligence or intent. ELEMENTS: 1. A person is performing a lawful act9 (. -ith due care9 2. <e causes injury to another by mere accident9 4. -ithout fault or intention of causing it. G. A PERSON WHO ACTS UN&ER THE COMPULSION OF AN IRRESISTABLE FORCE ELEMENTS: 1. #hat the compulsion is by means of physical force. (. #hat the physical force must be irresistable. 2. #hat the physical force must come from a third person. 0asis3 complete absence of freedom or voluntariness. #he force must be so irresistable as to reduce the actor to a mere instrument who act not only without will but against his will. >. UNCONTROLLABLE FEAR ELEMENTS: 1. #hat the threat which causes the fear is of an evil greater than, or at least e4ual to, that which he is re4uired to commit9 (. #hat it promises an evil of such gravity and imminence that the ordinary man would have succumbed to it.
=uress as a valid defense should be based on real, imminent, or reasonable fear for one's life or limb and should not be speculative, fanciful, or remote fear. /ACTUS ME INVITO FACTUS NON EST MEUS ACTUS1 6 An act done by me against my will is not my act.
7. INSUPERABLE CAUSE. INSUPERABLE CAUSE 6 some motive which has lawfully, morally or physically prevented a person to do what the law commands. ELEMENTS: 1. #hat an act is re4uired by law to be done. (. #hat a person fails to perform such act. 2. #hat his failure to perform such act was due to some lawful or insuperable cause. EFa7(#e): a. #he municipal president detained the offended party for three days because to ta1e him to the nearest justice of the peace re4uired a journey for three days by boat as there was no other means of transportation. (!2 vs. 8icentillo" &3 Phil. &&6- #he distance which re4uired a journey for three days was considered an insuperable cause. ote3 5nder the law, the person arrested must be delivered to the nearest judicial authority at most within 1D hours (now 2> hours, Art. 1(/ )P!"9 otherwise, the public officer will be liable for arbitrary detention. b. A mother who at the time of childbirth was overcome by severe diBBiness and e.treme debility, and left the child in a thic1et were said child died, is not liable for infanticide because it was physically impossible for her to ta1e home the child. (People vs. andian" )' Phil. 9'*-. #he severe diBBiness and e.treme debility of the woman constitute an insuperable cause. CRIMINAL LAW COMMITTEE CHAIRPERSON: Mark David Martinez EDP: Elaine Masukat ASSISTANTS: Catherine Danao, Alert Rodri!uez, Claro Re!ino Sa"#a!a, $izelle %ou Caahu!, Mar& 'aren (uizon, %eo San )uan, Ma* +i,toria -a"ao, R&an %ita, .a&ani .rillante, )r* 10 2005 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS
ABSOLUTORY CAUSES - are those where the act committed is a crime but for reasons of public policy and sentiment, there is no penalty imposed. O'er a")%#3%r< 6a3)e): 1. &pontaneous desistance (Art. >" (. Accessories who are e.empt from criminal liability (Art. (?" 2. =eath or physical injuries inflicted under e.ceptional circumstances (Art. (4E" 4. Persons e.empt from criminal liability for theft, swindling and malicious mischief (Art. 22(" /. %nstigation 7ntrapment is *# an absolutory cause. A /u0:/ust operation conducted in connection with illegal drug-related offenses is a form of entrapment. ENTRAPMENT INSTIGATION 1. -ays and means are resorted to for the capture of lawbrea1er in the e.ecution of his criminal plan. 1. %nstigator induces the would- be accused to commit the crime, hence he becomes a co-principal. (. not a bar to the prosecution and conviction of the lawbrea1er (. it will result in the ac4uittal of the accused. C'a(er T'ree: C!r637)a$6e) W'!6' M!!:ae Cr!7!$a# L!a"!#!< ART.,+ MITIGATING CIRCUMSTANCES MITIGATING CIRCUMSTANCES 6 those which if present in the commission of the crime, do not entirely free the actor from criminal liability but serve only to reduce the penalty. *ne single fact cannot be made the basis of more than one mitigating circumstance. <ence, a mitigating circumstance arising from a single fact, absorbs all the other mitigating circumstances arising from the same fact. BASIS : =iminution of either freedom of action intelligence or intent or on the lesser perversity of the offender. CLASSES OR&INARY PRIVILEGE& &ource &ubsections 1-1? of Art. 12 ()P!" Arts. >D, >F and >4 of )P! As to the effect %f not offset (by an aggravating circumstanc e" it will operate to have the penalty imposed at its minimum period, provided the penalty is a divisible one %t operates to reduce the penalty by one to two degrees depending upon what the law provides As to offset 8ay be offset by aggravating circums- tance !annot be offset ,. INCOMPLETE DUSTIFYING OR EXEMPTING CIRCUMSTANCES Applies, when all the re4uisites necessary to justify the act are not attendant. 0ut in the case of @incomplete self- defense, defense of relatives, and defense of a strangerA, unlawful aggression must be present, it being an indispensable re4uisite. 2. UN&ER ,B0 OR OVER A- YEARS OL& %t is the age of the accused at the time of the commission of the crime which should be determined. <is age at the time of the trial is immaterial. Le:a# e44e6) %4 9ar!%3) a:e) %4 %44e$8er 1. ine (F" years of age and below 6 e.empting circumstance. (Art. 1(, par. (" 2005 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS EEC!TI"E COMMITTEE AND S!B#ECT C$AIRPERSONS Ma%&'el A(a%en)o* /Over0all Chair#erson1, Ronald #al+an,a% /Over0all +i,e Chair1, Yolanda Tolen)&no/+C0A,ads1, )enn&fe% Ang/+C0 Se,retariat1, #o- Ind.')&/o /+C02inan,e1, Ela&ne Ma*.0a) /+C0 EDP1, Anna Ma%ga%&)a E%e* /+C0%o!isti,s1 #ona)1an Mang.nda-ao /Politi,al %a31, 2%an'&* Bened&') Reo).)a% /%aor %a31, Ro+.ald Pad&lla /Civil %a31, C1a%+a&ne To%%e* /Ta4ation %a31, Ma%0 Da/&d Ma%)&ne, /Cri"inal %a31, 3a%n- L.&*a Aleg%e /Co""er,ial %a31, #&n0- Ann !- /Re"edial %a31, #a'0&e Lo. Ba.)&*)a /%e!al Ethi,s1 San Beda College of Law 11 MEMORY AID IN CRIMINAL LAW 2. *ver F but not more than 1/ 6 e.empting unless, he acted with discernment in which case penalty is reduced to at least two ((" degrees lower than that imposed. (Art. 1(, par. 29 Art. >D, par. 1" 3. Above 1/ but under 1D - regardless of discernment, penalty is reduced by one (1" degree lower than that imposed. (Art. >D par. (" 4. 8inor delin4uent under 1D years of age, sentence suspended (Art. 1F(, P= >?2 as amended by P= 11EF" /. 1D years or over 6 full criminal responsibility. >. E? years or over 6 mitigating, no imposition of death penalty9 if already imposed, e.ecution of death penalty is suspended and commuted. 0A&%&3 diminution of intelligence +. NO INTENTION TO COMMIT SO GRAVE A WRONG R3#e 4%r 'e a((#!6a!%$: !an be ta1en into account only when the facts proven show that there is a notable and evident disproportion between the means employed to e.ecute the criminal act and its conse4uences.
%ntention may be ascertained by considering3 a" the weapon used b" the part of the body injured c" the injury inflicted 0A&%& 3 intent is diminished ;. PROVOCATION OR THREAT PROVOCATION 6 any unjust or improper conduct or act of the offended party, capable of e.citing, inciting or irritating any one. RE=UISITES: 1. #he provocation must be sufficient. (. %t must originate from the offended party. 2. #he provocation must be immediate to the commission of the crime by the person who is provo1ed. #he threat should not be offensive and positively strong. *therwise, the threat to inflict real injury is an unlawful aggression, which may give rise to self-defense. G. VIN&ICATION OF GRAVE OFFENSE RE=UISITES: 1. #hat there be a grave offense done to the one committing the felony, his spouse, ascendants9 descendants, legitimate, natural or adopted brothers or sisters or relatives by affinity within the same degrees9 2. #hat the felony is committed in immediate vindication of such grave offense. @%mmediateA allows for a lapse of time unli1e in sufficient provocation, as long as the offender is still suffering from the mental agony brought about by the offense to him. PROVOCATION VIN&ICATION 1. %t is made directly only to the person committing the felony. 1. #he grave offense may be committed also against the offender's relatives mentioned by law. (. #he cause that brought about the provocation need not be a grave offense. (. #he offended party must have done a grave offense to the offender or his relatives mentioned by law. 2. %t is necessary that the provocation or threat immediately preceded the act. 2. #he vindication of the grave offense may be pro.imate, which admits of an %#7):A$ of time. G. PASSION OR OBFUSCATION I re23!re) 'a3 1. #he accused acted upon an impulse. (. #he impulse must be so powerful that it naturally produced passion or obfuscation in him. RE=UISITES: CRIMINAL LAW COMMITTEE CHAIRPERSON: Mark David Martinez EDP: Elaine Masukat ASSISTANTS: Catherine Danao, Alert Rodri!uez, Claro Re!ino Sa"#a!a, $izelle %ou Caahu!, Mar& 'aren (uizon, %eo San )uan, Ma* +i,toria -a"ao, R&an %ita, .a&ani .rillante, )r* 12 2005 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS
1. #hat there be an act, both unlawful and sufficient to produce such a condition of mind9 (. #hat said act which produced the obfuscation was not far removed from the commission of the crime by a considerable length of time, during which the perpetrator might recover his normal e4uanimity. A mitigating circumstance only when the same arose from lawful sentiments. 0A&%&3 $oss of reasoning and self- control, thereby diminishing the e.ercise of his will power. WHEN PASSION OR OBFUSCATION NOT MITIGATING: W'e$ 6%77!e8: 1. %n the spirit of lawlessness, or 2. %n a spirit of revenge PASSIONI OBFUSCATION PROVOCATION - produced by an impulse which may be caused by provocation - the provocation comes from the injured party. - the offense need not be immediate. %t is only re4uired that the influence thereof lasts until the moment the crime is committed -must immediately precede the commission of the crime. A. SURREN&ER AN& CONFESSION OF GUILT RE=UISITES OF VOLUNTARY SURREN&ER: 1. #hat the offender had not been actually arrested9 (. #hat the offender surrendered himself to a person in authority or to the latter's agent9 2. #hat the surrender was voluntary. WHEN SURREN&ER VOLUNTARY A surrender to be voluntary must be spontaneous, showing the intent of the accused to submit himself unconditionally to the authorities, either because3 1. he ac1nowledges his guilt9 or (. he wishes to save them the trouble and e.pense necessarily incurred in his search and capture. RE=UISITES OF VOLUNTARY PLEA OF GUILTY: 1. #hat the offender spontaneously confessed his guilt. (. #hat the confession of guilt was made in open court, that is, before the competent court that is to try the case9 and 2. #hat the confession of guilt was made prior to the presentation of evidence for the prosecution. 0A&%&3 lesser perversity of the offender. B. PHYSICAL &EFECT OF OFFEN&ER
-hen the offender is deaf and dumb, blind or otherwise suffering from some physical defect, restricting his means of action, defense or communication with others. #he physical defect must relate to the offense committed. 0A&%&3 diminution of element of voluntariness. C. ILLNESS OF THE OFFEN&ER RE=UISITES: 1. #hat the illness of the offender must diminish the e.ercise of his will-power. (. #hat such illness should not deprive the offender of consciousness of his acts. %ncludes illness of the mind not amounting to insanity. 0A&%&3 diminution of intelligence and intent. ,-. SIMILAR AN& ANALOGOUS CIRCUMSTANCES 2005 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS EEC!TI"E COMMITTEE AND S!B#ECT C$AIRPERSONS Ma%&'el A(a%en)o* /Over0all Chair#erson1, Ronald #al+an,a% /Over0all +i,e Chair1, Yolanda Tolen)&no/+C0A,ads1, )enn&fe% Ang/+C0 Se,retariat1, #o- Ind.')&/o /+C02inan,e1, Ela&ne Ma*.0a) /+C0 EDP1, Anna Ma%ga%&)a E%e* /+C0%o!isti,s1 #ona)1an Mang.nda-ao /Politi,al %a31, 2%an'&* Bened&') Reo).)a% /%aor %a31, Ro+.ald Pad&lla /Civil %a31, C1a%+a&ne To%%e* /Ta4ation %a31, Ma%0 Da/&d Ma%)&ne, /Cri"inal %a31, 3a%n- L.&*a Aleg%e /Co""er,ial %a31, #&n0- Ann !- /Re"edial %a31, #a'0&e Lo. Ba.)&*)a /%e!al Ethi,s1 San Beda College of Law 14 MEMORY AID IN CRIMINAL LAW EXAMPLES: 1" %mpulse of jealousy, similar to passion and obfuscation. (" #estifying for the prosecution, analogous to plea of guilty C'a(er F%3r: C!r637)a$6e) E'!6' A::ra9ae Cr!7!$a# L!a"!#!< *Ar. ,;. A::ra9a!$: 6!r637)a$6e) 6 are those which, if attendant in the commission of the crime, serve to have the penalty imposed in its ma.imum period provided by law for the offense or change the nature of the crime. BASIS: #hey are based on the greater perversity of the offender manifested in the commission of the felony as shown by3 1. the motivating power itself, (. the place of the commission, 2. the means and ways employed 4. the time, or /. the personal circumstances of the offender, or the offended party. KIN&S OF AGGRAVATING CIRCUMSTANCES: 1. ,eneric 6 those which apply to all crimes, such as3 a" Advantage ta1en of public position9 b" !ontempt or insult of public authorities9 c" !rime committed in the dwelling of the offended party9 d" Abuse of confidence or obvious ungratefulness9 e" Place where crime is committed9 f" ighttime, uninhabited place, or band9 g" )ecidivism (reincidencia"9 h" <abituality (reiteracion"9 i" !raft, fraud or disguise9 j" 5nlawful entry9 1" 0rea1ing of parts of the house9 l" 5se of persons under 1/ years of age. (. &pecific 6 those which apply only to specific crimes, such as ignominy in crimes against chastity and cruelty and treachery which are applicable only to crimes against persons. a" =isregard of ran1, age or se. due the offended party9 b" Abuse of superior strength or means be employed to wea1en the defense9 c" #reachery (alevosia"9 d" %gnominy9 e" !ruelty9 f" 5se of unlicensed firearm in the murder or homicide committed therewith ()A D(F4". 2. Gualifying 6 those that change the nature of the crime. Alevosia (treachery" or evident premeditation 4ualifies the 1illing of a person to murder. Art. (4D enumerates the 4ualifying aggravating circumstances which 4uality the 1illing of person to murder. 4. %nherent 6 those which of necessity accompany the commission of the crime, therefore not considered in increasing the penalty to be imposed, such as3 a" 7vident premeditation in robbery, theft, estafa, adultery and concubinage9 b" Abuse of public office in bribery9 c" 0rea1ing of a wall or unlawful entry into a house in robbery with the use of force upon things9 d" +raud in estafa9 e" =eceit in simple seduction9 f" %gnominy in rape. /. &pecial 6 those which arise under special conditions to increase the penalty of the offense and cannot be offset by mitigating circumstances, such as3 a" Guasi-recidivism (Art. 1>?"9 b" !omple. crimes (Art. 4D"9 CRIMINAL LAW COMMITTEE CHAIRPERSON: Mark David Martinez EDP: Elaine Masukat ASSISTANTS: Catherine Danao, Alert Rodri!uez, Claro Re!ino Sa"#a!a, $izelle %ou Caahu!, Mar& 'aren (uizon, %eo San )uan, Ma* +i,toria -a"ao, R&an %ita, .a&ani .rillante, )r* 15 2005 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS
c" 7rror in personae (Art. 4F"9 d" #a1ing advantage of public position and membership in an organiBedHsyndicated crime group (Par.1IaJ, Art. >(". GENERIC AGGRAVATING CIRCUMSTANCE =UALIFYING AGGRAVATING CIRCUMSTANCE A) % !) e44e6 %ncreases the penalty which should be imposed upon the accused to the ma.imum period but without e.ceeding the limit prescribed by law. #o give the crime its proper and e.clusive name and to place the author thereof in such a situation as to deserve no other penalty than that specially prescribed by law for said crime. A) % E'e'er ! 6a$ "e %44)e "< a 7!!:a!$: 6!r637)a$6e 8ay be offset by a mitigating circumstance. !annot be offset by a mitigating circumstance RULES ON AGGRAVATING CIRCUMSTANCES 1. Aggravating circumstances shall not be appreciated if3 a) #hey constitute a crime specially punishable by law, or b) #hey are included by the law in defining a crime and prescribing a penalty therefor, shall not be ta1en into account for the purpose of increasing the penalty. 7;A8P$73 @#hat the crime be committed by means of Kfire,K e.plosionA (Art. 14, par. 1(" is in itself a crime of arson (Art. 2(1" or a crime involving destruction (Art. 2(4". %t is not to be considered to increase the penalty for the crime of arson or for the crime involving destruction. 2. #he same rule shall apply with respect to any aggravating circumstance inherent in the crime to such a degree that it must of necessity accompany the commission thereof. (Art. )+" par. +- 2. Aggravating circumstances which arise3 a" +rom the moral attributes of the offender, or b" +rom his private relations with the offended party, or c" +rom any personal cause, shall only serve to aggravate the liability of the principals, accomplices and accessories as to whom such circumstances are attendant. (Art. )+" par. '- 4. #he circumstances which consist a" %n the material e.ecution of the act, or b" %n the means employed to accomplish it, shall serve to aggravate the liability of those persons only who had 1nowledge of them at the time of the e.ecution of the act or their cooperation therein. 7.cept when there is proof of conspiracy in which case the act of one is deemed to be the act of all, regardless of lac1 of 1nowledge of the facts constituting the circumstance. (Art. )+" par. ,- 5. Aggravating circumstances, regardless of its 1ind, should be specifically alleged in the information A= proved as fully as the crime itself in order to increase the penalty. (2ec. 3" $ule &&*" +*** $ules of 4riminal Procedure- 6. -hen there is more than one 4ualifying aggravating circumstance present, one of them will be appreciated as 4ualifying aggravating while the others will be considered as generic aggravating. ART. ,; AGGRAVATING CIRCUMSTANCES Par. 1. That advantage be taken by the offender of his public position. Applicable only when the offender is a public officer. #he offender must have abused his public position or at least use of the same facilitated the commission of the offense. 2005 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS EEC!TI"E COMMITTEE AND S!B#ECT C$AIRPERSONS Ma%&'el A(a%en)o* /Over0all Chair#erson1, Ronald #al+an,a% /Over0all +i,e Chair1, Yolanda Tolen)&no/+C0A,ads1, )enn&fe% Ang/+C0 Se,retariat1, #o- Ind.')&/o /+C02inan,e1, Ela&ne Ma*.0a) /+C0 EDP1, Anna Ma%ga%&)a E%e* /+C0%o!isti,s1 #ona)1an Mang.nda-ao /Politi,al %a31, 2%an'&* Bened&') Reo).)a% /%aor %a31, Ro+.ald Pad&lla /Civil %a31, C1a%+a&ne To%%e* /Ta4ation %a31, Ma%0 Da/&d Ma%)&ne, /Cri"inal %a31, 3a%n- L.&*a Aleg%e /Co""er,ial %a31, #&n0- Ann !- /Re"edial %a31, #a'0&e Lo. Ba.)&*)a /%e!al Ethi,s1 San Beda College of Law 15 MEMORY AID IN CRIMINAL LAW #his circumstance cannot be ta1en into consideration in offenses where ta1ing advantage of official position is made by law an integral element of the crime, such as in malversation under Art. (1E, or in falsification of a document committed by public officers under Art. 1E1. #a1ing advantage of a public position is also inherent in the case of accessories under Art. 1F, par. 2 (harboring, concealing, or assisting in the escape of the principal of the crime", and in crimes committed by public officers (Arts. (?4-(4/". Par. 2 That the crime be committed in contempt of or with insult to the public authorities. RE=UISITES OF THIS CIRCUMSTANCE: 1. #hat the public authority is engaged in the e.ercise of his functions. (. #hat he who is thus engaged in the e.ercise of said functions is not the person against whom the crime is committed. 2. #he offender 1nows him to be a public authority. 4. <is presence has not prevented the offender from committing the criminal act. P3"#!6 a3'%r!< 6 sometimes also called a person in authority, is a public officer who is directly vested with jurisdiction, that is, a public officer who has the power to govern and e.ecute the laws9 li1e a mayor, councilor, governor, barangay captain and barangay chairman. A teacher or professor of a public or recogniBed private school is not a @public authority within the contemplation of this paragraph. -hile he is a person in authority under Art. 1/(, that status is only for purposes of Art. 14D (direct assault" and Art. 1/( (resistance and disobedience". Par. 3 That the act be committed 1! with insult or in disregard of the respect due the offended party on account of his a! rank" b! age" or c! se#" or 2! that it be committed in the dwelling of the offended party" if the latter has not given provocation. #he four circumstances enumerated should be considered as one aggravating circumstance only. =isregard of ran1, age or se. is essentially applicable only to crimes against person or honor. #hey are not ta1en into account in crimes against property. #o be appreciated as an aggravating circumstance, there must be evidence that in the commission of the crime, the offender deliberately intended to offend or insult the se., age and ran1 of the offended party. Ra$5 %4 'e %44e$8e8 (ar< 6 is the designation or title of distinction used to fi. the relative position of the offended party in reference to others. - there must be a difference in the social condition of the offender and the offended party. A:e %4 'e %44e$8e8 (ar< 6 may refer to old age or the tender age of the victim. SeF %4 'e %44e$8e8 (ar< 6 refers to the female se., not to the male se.. THE AGGRAVATING CIRCUMSTANCE OF &ISREGAR& OF RANK0 AGE0 OR SEX IS NOT APPLICABLE IN THE FOLLOWING CASES: 1. -hen the offender acted with passion and obfuscation. (. -hen there e.ists a relationship between the offended party and the offender. 2. -hen the condition of being a woman is indispensable in the commission of the crime. (e.g. in parricide, abduction, seduction and rape" =isregard of se. and age are not absorbed in treachery because treachery refers to the manner of the commission of the crime, while disregard of se. and age pertains to CRIMINAL LAW COMMITTEE CHAIRPERSON: Mark David Martinez EDP: Elaine Masukat ASSISTANTS: Catherine Danao, Alert Rodri!uez, Claro Re!ino Sa"#a!a, $izelle %ou Caahu!, Mar& 'aren (uizon, %eo San )uan, Ma* +i,toria -a"ao, R&an %ita, .a&ani .rillante, )r* 16 2005 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS
the relationship of the victim (People vs. Lapa5" ;arch '&" &363-. &Ee##!$: 6 must be a building or structure, e.clusively used for rest and comfort. A @combination of a house and a storeA or a mar1et stall where the victim slept is not a dwelling. - dwelling includes dependencies, the foot of the staircase and enclosure under the house. #he aggravating circumstance of dwelling re4uires that the crime be wholly or partly committed therein or in any integral part thereof. =welling does not mean the permanent residence or domicile of the offended party or that he must be the owner thereof. <e must, however, be actually living or dwelling therein even for a temporary duration or purpose. %t is not necessary that the accused should have actually entered the dwelling of the victim to commit the offense9 it is enough that the victim was attac1ed inside his own house, although the assailant may have devised means to perpetrate the assault from without. WHAT AGGRAVATES THE COMMISSION OF THE CRIME IN ONEJS &WELLING: 1. #he abuse of confidence which the offended party reposed in the offender by opening the door to him9 or (. #he violation of the sanctity of the home by trespassing therein with violence or against the will of the owner. MEANING OF PROVOCATION IN THE AGGRAVATING CIRCUMSTANCE OF &WELLING: #he provocation must be3 1. ,iven by the owner of the dwelling, (. &ufficient, and 2. %mmediate to the commission of the crime. %f all these conditions are present, the offended party is deemed to have given the provocation, and the fact that the crime is committed in the dwelling of the offended party is not an aggravating circumstance. )7A&*3 -hen it is the offended party who has provo1ed the incident, he loses his right to the respect and consideration due him in his own house. &WELLING IS NOT AGGRAVATING IN THE FOLLOWING CASES: 1. -hen both the offender and the offended party are occupants of the same house, and this is true even if offender is a servant in the house. 7;!7P#%*3 %n case of adultery in the conjugal dwelling, the same is aggravating. <owever, if the paramour also dwells in the conjugal dwelling, the applicable aggravating circumstance is abuse of confidence. 2. -hen robbery is committed by the use of force upon things, dwelling is not aggravating because it is inherent. 0ut dwelling is aggravating in robbery with violence against or intimidation of persons because this class of robbery can be committed without the necessity of trespassing the sanctity of the offended party's house.
2. %n the crime of trespass to dwelling, it is inherent or included by law in defining the crime. 4. -hen the owner of the dwelling gave sufficient and immediate provocation. #here must e.ist a close relation between the provocation made by the victim and the commission of the crime by the accused. /. #he victim is not a dweller of the house. Par. $. That the act be committed with 1! abuse of confidence or 2005 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS EEC!TI"E COMMITTEE AND S!B#ECT C$AIRPERSONS Ma%&'el A(a%en)o* /Over0all Chair#erson1, Ronald #al+an,a% /Over0all +i,e Chair1, Yolanda Tolen)&no/+C0A,ads1, )enn&fe% Ang/+C0 Se,retariat1, #o- Ind.')&/o /+C02inan,e1, Ela&ne Ma*.0a) /+C0 EDP1, Anna Ma%ga%&)a E%e* /+C0%o!isti,s1 #ona)1an Mang.nda-ao /Politi,al %a31, 2%an'&* Bened&') Reo).)a% /%aor %a31, Ro+.ald Pad&lla /Civil %a31, C1a%+a&ne To%%e* /Ta4ation %a31, Ma%0 Da/&d Ma%)&ne, /Cri"inal %a31, 3a%n- L.&*a Aleg%e /Co""er,ial %a31, #&n0- Ann !- /Re"edial %a31, #a'0&e Lo. Ba.)&*)a /%e!al Ethi,s1 San Beda College of Law 17 MEMORY AID IN CRIMINAL LAW 2! obvious ungratefulness. Par. 4 provides two aggravating circumstances which, if present in the same case and must be independently appreciated. -hile one may be related to the other in the factual situation in the case, they cannot be lumped together as abuse of confidence re4uires a special confidential relationship between the offender and the victim, but this is not so in ungratefulness. RE=UISITES OF ABUSE OF CONFI&ENCE: 1. #hat the offended party had trusted the offender. 2. #hat the offender a/used such trust by committing a crime against the offended party. 3. #hat the abuse of confidence facilitated the commission of the crime. Abuse of confidence is inherent in malversation (Art. (1E", 4ualified theft (Art. 21?", estafa by conversion or misappropriation (Art. 21/", and 4ualified seduction (Art. 22E". RE=UISITES OF OBVIOUS UNGRATEFULNESS 1. #hat the offended party had trusted the offender9 (. #hat the offender abused such trust by committing a crime against the offended party. 2. #hat the act be committed with obvious ungratefulness.
#he ungratefulness contemplated by par. 4 must be such clear and manifest ingratitude on the part of the accused. Par. % That the crime be committed 1! in the palace of the &hief '#ecutive" or in his presence" or 2! where public authorities are engaged in the discharge of their duties" or 3! in a place dedicated to religious worship. 7.cept for the third which re4uires that official functions are being performed at the time of the commission of the crime, the other places mentioned are aggravating per se even if no official duties or acts of religious worship are being conducted there. !emeteries, however respectable they may be, are not considered as place dedicated to the worship of ,od. PAR. G. W'ere (3"#!6 a3'%r!!e) are e$:a:e8 !$ 'e 8!)6'ar:e %4 'e!r 83!e) PAR. 2. C%$e7( %r !$)3# % (3"#!6 a3'%r!!e) I$ "%' Public authorities are in the performance of their duties P#a6e E'ere (3"#!6 83< !) (er4%r7e8 %n their office. *utside of their office. T'e %44e$8e8 (ar< 8ay or may not be the public authority Public authority should not be the offended party Par. (. That the crime be committed 1! in the nighttime" or 2! in an uninhabited place" or 3! by a band" whenever such circumstance may facilitate the commission of the offense. -hen present in the same case and their element are distinctly palpable and can subsist independently, they shall be considered separately. WHEN NIGHTTIME0 UNINHABITE& PLACE OR BAN& AGGRAVATING: 1. -hen it facilitated the commission of the crime9 or 2. -hen especiall0 sought for by the offender to insure the commission of the crime or for the purpose of impunity9 or 3. -hen the offender too1 advantage thereof for the purpose of impunity. CRIMINAL LAW COMMITTEE CHAIRPERSON: Mark David Martinez EDP: Elaine Masukat ASSISTANTS: Catherine Danao, Alert Rodri!uez, Claro Re!ino Sa"#a!a, $izelle %ou Caahu!, Mar& 'aren (uizon, %eo San )uan, Ma* +i,toria -a"ao, R&an %ita, .a&ani .rillante, )r* 18 2005 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS
N!:'!7e *obscuridad. 6 that period of dar1ness beginning at end of dus1 and ending at dawn. ights are from sunset to sunrise. %t is necessary that the commission of the crime was begun and completed at nighttime. -hen the place of the crime is illuminated by light, nighttime is not aggravating. GENERAL RULE: ighttime is absorbed in treachery. EXCEPTION3 -here both the treacherous mode of attac1 and nocturnity were deliberately decided upon in the same case, they can be considered separately if such circumstances have different factual bases. #hus3 7n People vs. erdida" et. al. (<une '*" &3))-, nighttime was considered since it was purposely sought, and treachery was further appreciated because the victim's hands and arms were tied together before he was beaten up by the accused. 7n People vs. Ong" et. al. (<an. '*" &3(9-, there was treachery as the victim was stabbed while lying face up and defenseless, and nighttime was considered upon proof that it facilitated the commission of the offense and was ta1en advantage of by the accused. U$!$'a"!e8 (#a6e *despoblado. 6 one where there are no houses at all9 a place at a considerable distance from town, or where the houses are scattered at a great distance from each other. -hat actually determines whether this aggravating circumstance should be considered against the accused, aside from the distance and isolation of the place, is the reasonable possibility of the victim receiving or securing aid from third persons. Ba$8 *en cuadrilla. 6 whenever more than three (i.e., at least four" armed malefactors shall have acted together in the commission of an offense, it shall be deemed committed by a band. #he re4uisite four armed persons contemplated in this circumstance must all be principals by direct participation who acted together in the e.ecution of the acts constituting the crime. %f one of them was a principal by inducement, there would be no cuadrilla but the aggravating circumstance of having acted with the aid of armed men may be considered against the inducer if the other two acted as his accomplice. #his aggravating circumstance is absorbed in the circumstance of abuse of superior strength. #his aggravating circumstance is not applicable in crimes against chastity. Par. ) That the crime be committed on the occasion of a conflagration" shipwreck" earth*uake" epidemic or other calamity or misfortune. REASON FOR THE AGGRAVATION: #he debased form of criminality met in one who, in the midst of a great calamity, instead of lending aid to the afflicted, adds to their suffering by ta1ing advantage of their misfortune to despoil them. #herefore it is necessary that the offender too1 advantage of the calamity or misfortune. Par. + That the crime be committed with the aid of 1! armed men or 2!persons who insure or afford impunity. RE=UISITES: 1. #hat armed men or persons too1 part in the commission of the crime, directl0 or indirectl0. 2. #hat the accused availed himself of their aid or relied upon them when the crime was committed. 2005 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS EEC!TI"E COMMITTEE AND S!B#ECT C$AIRPERSONS Ma%&'el A(a%en)o* /Over0all Chair#erson1, Ronald #al+an,a% /Over0all +i,e Chair1, Yolanda Tolen)&no/+C0A,ads1, )enn&fe% Ang/+C0 Se,retariat1, #o- Ind.')&/o /+C02inan,e1, Ela&ne Ma*.0a) /+C0 EDP1, Anna Ma%ga%&)a E%e* /+C0%o!isti,s1 #ona)1an Mang.nda-ao /Politi,al %a31, 2%an'&* Bened&') Reo).)a% /%aor %a31, Ro+.ald Pad&lla /Civil %a31, C1a%+a&ne To%%e* /Ta4ation %a31, Ma%0 Da/&d Ma%)&ne, /Cri"inal %a31, 3a%n- L.&*a Aleg%e /Co""er,ial %a31, #&n0- Ann !- /Re"edial %a31, #a'0&e Lo. Ba.)&*)a /%e!al Ethi,s1 San Beda College of Law 19 MEMORY AID IN CRIMINAL LAW #his aggravating circumstance re4uires that the armed men are accomplices who ta1e part in that minor capacity directly or indirectly, and not when they were merely present at the crime scene. either should they constitute a band, for then the proper aggravating circumstance would be cuadrilla. WHEN THIS AGGRAVATING CIRCUMSTANCE SHALL NOT BE CONSI&ERE&: 1. -hen both the attac1ing party and the party attac1ed were e4ually armed. 2. -hen the accused as well as those who cooperated with him in the commission of the crime acted under the same plan and for the same purpose. Par. > /B< a "a $8 1 Par. B. /W!' 'e a!8 %4 ar7e8 7e$1 A) % 'e!r $37"er )e4uires more than three armed malefactors (i.e., at least four" At least two A) % 'e!r a6!%$ )e4uires that more than three armed malefactors shall have acted together in the commission of an offense. #his circumstance is present even if one of the offenders merely relied on their aid, for actual aid is not necessary. %f there are four armed men, aid of armed men is absorbed in employment of a band. %f there are three armed men or less, aid of armed men may be the aggravating circumstance. @Aid of armed menA includes @armed women.A Par. , That the accused is a recidivist. RE=UISITES: 1. #hat the offender is on trial for an offense9 2. #hat he was previousl0 convicted by final =udgment of another crime9 3. #hat both the first and the second offenses are embraced in the same title of the 4ode9 4. #hat the offender is convicted of the new offense. MEANING OF /a 'e !7e %4 '!) r!a# 4%r %$e 6r!7e.1 %t is employed in its general sense, including the rendering of the judgment. %t is meant to include everything that is done in the course of the trial, from arraignment until after sentence is announced by the judge in open court. 0eing an ordinary aggravating circumstance, recidivism affects only the periods of a penalty, e.cept in prostitution and vagrancy (Art. (?(" and gambling (P= 1>?(" wherein recidivism increases the penalties by degrees. o other generic aggravating circumstance produces this effect. %n recidivism it is sufficient that the succeeding offense be committed after the commission of the preceding offense provided that at the time of his trial for the second offense, the accused had already been convicted of the first offense. %f both offenses were committed on the same date, they shall be considered as only one, hence, they cannot be separately counted in order to constitute recidivism. Also, judgments of convicted handed down on the same day shall be considered as only one conviction. )7A&*3 0ecause the !ode re4uires that to be considered as separate convictions, at the time of his trial for one crime the accused shall have been previously convicted by final judgment of the other. #o prove recidivism, it is necessary to allege the same in the information and to attach thereto certified copy of the sentences rendered against the accused. CRIMINAL LAW COMMITTEE CHAIRPERSON: Mark David Martinez EDP: Elaine Masukat ASSISTANTS: Catherine Danao, Alert Rodri!uez, Claro Re!ino Sa"#a!a, $izelle %ou Caahu!, Mar& 'aren (uizon, %eo San )uan, Ma* +i,toria -a"ao, R&an %ita, .a&ani .rillante, )r* 20 2005 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS
)ecidivism must be ta1en into account no matter how many years have intervened between the first and second felonies. 7ven if the accused was granted a pardon for the first offense, but he commits another felony embraced in the same title of the !ode, the first conviction is still counted to ma1e him a recidivist since pardon does not obliterate the fact of his prior conviction. #he rule is different in the case of amnesty which theoretically considers the previous transgressions as not punishable. Par. 1- That the offender has been previously punished for an offense to which the law attaches an e*ual or greater penalty or for two or more crimes to which it attaches a lighter penalty. RE=UISITES %4 .'IT'./&I01 %r HABITUALITY: 1. #hat the accused is on trial for an offense9 2. #hat he previously served sentence for another offense to which the law attaches an a" 74ual or b" ,reater penalty, or c" +or two or more crimes to which it attaches a lighter penalty than that for the new offense9 and 2. #hat he is convicted of the new offense .'IT'./&I01 RECI&IVISM A) % 'e 4!r) %44e$)e %t is necessary that the offender shall have served out his sentence for the first offense %t is enough that a final =udgment has been rendered in the first offense. A) % 'e 5!$8 %4 %44e$)e) !$9%#9e8 #he previous and subse4uent offenses must not be em braced in the same title of the !ode. )e4uires that the offenses be included in the same title of the !ode. THE FOUR FORMS OF REPETITION ARE: 1. )ecidivism (par. F, Art. 14" 6 where a person, on separate occasions, is convicted of two offenses embraced in the same title in the )P!. #his is a generic aggravating circumstance. (. $eiteracion or habituality (par. 1?, Art. 14" 6 where the offender has been previously punished for an offense to which the law attaches an e4ual or greater penalty or for two crimes to which it attaches a lighter penalty. #his is a generic aggravating circumstance. 2. 8ulti-recidivism or habitual delin4uency (Art. >(, par, /" 6 where a person within a period of ten years from the date of his release or last conviction of the crimes of serious or less serious physical injuries, robbery, theft, estafa or falsification, is found guilty of the said crimes a third time or oftener. #his is an e.traordinary aggravating circumstance. 4. Guasi-recidivism (Art. 1>?" 6 -here a person commits felony before beginning to serve or while serving sentence on a previous conviction for a felony. #his is a special aggravating circumstance. &ince reiteracion provides that the accused has duly served the sentence for his previous convictionHs, or is legally considered to have done so, 4uasi-recidivism cannot at the same time constitute reiteracion, hence this aggravating circumstance cannot apply to a 4uasi-recidivist. %f the same set of facts constitutes recidivism and reiteracion, the liability of the accused should be aggravated by recidivism which can easily be proven. Par. 11 That the crime be committed in consideration of a price" reward or promise. -hen this aggravating circumstance is present, there must be two or more principals, the one who gave or 2005 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS EEC!TI"E COMMITTEE AND S!B#ECT C$AIRPERSONS Ma%&'el A(a%en)o* /Over0all Chair#erson1, Ronald #al+an,a% /Over0all +i,e Chair1, Yolanda Tolen)&no/+C0A,ads1, )enn&fe% Ang/+C0 Se,retariat1, #o- Ind.')&/o /+C02inan,e1, Ela&ne Ma*.0a) /+C0 EDP1, Anna Ma%ga%&)a E%e* /+C0%o!isti,s1 #ona)1an Mang.nda-ao /Politi,al %a31, 2%an'&* Bened&') Reo).)a% /%aor %a31, Ro+.ald Pad&lla /Civil %a31, C1a%+a&ne To%%e* /Ta4ation %a31, Ma%0 Da/&d Ma%)&ne, /Cri"inal %a31, 3a%n- L.&*a Aleg%e /Co""er,ial %a31, #&n0- Ann !- /Re"edial %a31, #a'0&e Lo. Ba.)&*)a /%e!al Ethi,s1 San Beda College of Law 21 MEMORY AID IN CRIMINAL LAW offered the price or promise and the one who accepted it, both of whom are principals. %f without previous promise it was given voluntarily after the crime had been committed as an e.pression of his appreciation for the sympathy and aid shown by the other accused, it should not be ta1en into consideration for the purpose of increasing the penalty. #he price, reward or promise need not consist of or refer to material things or that the same were actually delivered, it being sufficient that the offer made by the principal by inducement be accepted by the principal by direct participation before the commission of the offense. Par. 12 That the crime be committed by means of inundation" fire" poison" e#plosion" stranding of a vessel or intentional damage thereto" derailment of a locomotive" or by the use of any other artifice involving great waste and ruin. -hen another aggravating circumstance already 4ualifies the crime, any of these aggravating circumstances shall be considered as generic aggravating circumstance only. A 1illing committed through any of these 4ualifies the crime to murder, e.cept if arson was resorted to but without intent to 1ill, in view of P.=. 1>12 which provides a specific penalty for that situation. PAR. ,2 /"< 7ea$) %4 !$3$8a!%$0 4!re0 e6.1 PAR. ,- /%$ 'e %66a)!%$ %4 a 6%$4#a:ra!%$0 )'!(Ere650 e6. #he crime is committed by means of any such acts involving great waste or ruin. #he crime is committed on the occasion of a calamity or misfortune. Par. 13 That the act be committed with evident premeditation RE=UISITES: #he prosecution must prove 6 1. #he time when the offender determined to commit the crime9 2. An act manifestly indicating that the culprit has clung to his determination9 and 3. A sufficient lapse of time between the determination and e.ecution, to allow him to reflect upon the conse4uences of his act and to allow his conscience to overcome the resolution of his will. #o establish evident premeditation, it must be shown that there was a period sufficient to afford full opportunity for meditation and reflection, a time ade4uate to allow the conscience to overcome the resolution of the will, as well as outward acts showing the intent to 1ill. %t must be shown that the offender had sufficient time to reflect upon the conse4uences of his act but still persisted in his determination to commit the crime. (PEOPLE vs. 27L8A" et. al." #$ %o. &,*6(&" August 6" +**+- #he essence of evident premeditation is that the e.ecution of the criminal act is preceded by cool thought and reflection upon the resolution to carry out the criminal intent within a space of time sufficient to arrive at a calm judgment. (PEOPLE vs. AA>7E2" #$ %o. &'93(9" August &," +**+- 7vident premeditation is presumed to e.ist when conspiracy is directly established. -hen conspiracy is merely implied, evident premeditation cannot be presumed, the latter must be proved li1e any other fact. (PEOPLE vs. 2AP7#AO" et. al." #$ %o. &,,3(9" <une &6" +**'- Premeditation is a/sor/ed by reward or promise. CRIMINAL LAW COMMITTEE CHAIRPERSON: Mark David Martinez EDP: Elaine Masukat ASSISTANTS: Catherine Danao, Alert Rodri!uez, Claro Re!ino Sa"#a!a, $izelle %ou Caahu!, Mar& 'aren (uizon, %eo San )uan, Ma* +i,toria -a"ao, R&an %ita, .a&ani .rillante, )r* 22 2005 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS
-hen the offender decides to 1ill a particular person and premeditated on the 1illing of the latter, but when he carried out his plan he actually 1illed another person, it cannot properly be said that he premeditated on the 1illing of the actual victim. 0ut if the offender premeditated on the 1illing of an0 person, it is proper to consider against the offender the aggravating circumstance of premeditation, because whoever is 1illed by him is contemplated in his premeditation. Par. 1$ That 1! craft" 2! fraud" or 3! disguise be employed Cra4 *astucia. 6 involved the use of intellectual tric1ery or cunning on the part of the accused. - it is a chicanery resorted to by the accused to aid in the e.ecution of his criminal design. %t is employed as a scheme in the e.ecution of the crime. Fra38 *fraude. 6 insidious words or machinations used to induce the victim to act in a manner which would enable the offender to carry out his design. FRAU& CRAFT -here there is a direct inducement by insidious words or machinations, fraud is present. #he act of the accused done in order not to arouse the suspicion of the victim constitutes craft. According to Lustice )egalado, the fine distinctions between @craftA and @fraudA would not really be called for as these terms in Art. 14 are variants of means employed to deceive the victim and if all are present in the same case, they shall be applied as a single aggravating circumstance. !raft and fraud may be absorbed in treachery if they have been deliberately adopted as the means, methods or forms for the treacherous strategy, or they may co-e.ist independently where they are adopted for a different purpose in the commission of the crime. +or instance3 %n People vs. 2an Pedro (<an. ++" &36*-, where the accused pretended to hire the driver in order to get his vehicle, it was held that there was craft directed to the theft of the vehicle, separate from the means subse4uently used to treacherously 1ill the defenseless driver. %n People vs. ;asilang (<ul0 &&" &36)- there was also craft where after hitching a ride, the accused re4uested the driver to ta1e them to a place to visit somebody, when in fact they had already planned to 1ill the driver. &!):3!)e *disfra2. 6 resorting to any device to conceal identity. #he test of disguise is whether the device or contrivance resorted to by the offender was intended to or did ma1e identification more difficult, such as the use of a mas1 or false hair or beard. #he use of an assumed name in the publication of a libel constitutes disguise. Par. 1% That 1! advantage be taken of superior strength" or 2! means be employed to weaken the defense. Par. 1/ enunciates two aggravating circumstances, namely, that advantage was ta1en of superior strength, or that means were employed by the offender to wea1en the defense of the victim, either of which 4ualifies a 1illing to murder. 2005 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS EEC!TI"E COMMITTEE AND S!B#ECT C$AIRPERSONS Ma%&'el A(a%en)o* /Over0all Chair#erson1, Ronald #al+an,a% /Over0all +i,e Chair1, Yolanda Tolen)&no/+C0A,ads1, )enn&fe% Ang/+C0 Se,retariat1, #o- Ind.')&/o /+C02inan,e1, Ela&ne Ma*.0a) /+C0 EDP1, Anna Ma%ga%&)a E%e* /+C0%o!isti,s1 #ona)1an Mang.nda-ao /Politi,al %a31, 2%an'&* Bened&') Reo).)a% /%aor %a31, Ro+.ald Pad&lla /Civil %a31, C1a%+a&ne To%%e* /Ta4ation %a31, Ma%0 Da/&d Ma%)&ne, /Cri"inal %a31, 3a%n- L.&*a Aleg%e /Co""er,ial %a31, #&n0- Ann !- /Re"edial %a31, #a'0&e Lo. Ba.)&*)a /%e!al Ethi,s1 San Beda College of Law 24 MEMORY AID IN CRIMINAL LAW MEANING OF /a89a$a:e "e a5e$1: #o deliberately use e.cessive force that is out of proportion to the means for self-defense available to the person attac1ed. (PEOPLE vs. LO$7#A2" et. al." #$ %o. &,(),3" >ecem/er &(" +**+- NO A&VANTAGE OF SUPERIOR STRENGTH IN THE FOLLOWING: 1. *ne who attac1s another with passion and o/fuscation does not ta1e advantage of his superior strength. 2. -hen a ?uarrel arose unexpectedl0 and the fatal blow was struc1 at a time when the aggressor and his victim were engaged against each other as man to man. +or abuse of superior strength, the test is the relative strength of the offender and his victim, whether or not he too1 advantage of his greater strength. -hen there are several offenders participating in the crime, they must all be principals by direct participation and their attac1 against the victim must be concerted and intended to be so. Abuse of superior strength is inherent in the crime of parricide where the husband 1ills the wife. %t is generally accepted that the husband is physically stronger than the wife. Abuse of superior strength is also present when the offender uses a weapon which is out of proportion to the defense available to the offended party. @by a bandA @abuse of superior strengthA #he element of band is appreciated when the offense is committed by more than three armed malefactors regardless of the comparative strength of the victim or victims. #he gravamen of abuse of superiority is the ta1ing advantage by the culprits of their collective strength to overpower their relatively wea1er victim or victims. <ence, what is ta1en into account here is not the number of aggressors nor the fact that they are armed, but their relative physical strength vis:a vis the offended party. Abuse of superior strength absorbs cuadrilla (@bandA". /Mea$) e7(#%<e8 % Eea5e$ 8e4e$)e1 - the offender employs means that materiall0 wea1ens the resisting power of the offended party. EXAMPLES OF /7ea$) e7(#%<e8 % Eea5e$ 8e4e$)e1 1. -here one, struggling with another, suddenly throws a cloa1 over the head of his opponent and while in this situation he wounds or 1ills him. (. *ne who, while fighting with another, suddenly casts sand or dirt upon the latter eyes and then wounds or 1ills him. 2. -hen the offender, who had the intention to 1ill the victim, made the deceased into.icated, thereby materially wea1ening the latter's resisting power. #his circumstance is applicable only to crimes against persons, and sometimes against person and property, such as robbery with physical injuries or homicide. Par. 1( That the act be committed with treachery alevosia!. Trea6'er< *alevosia. 6 is present when the offender commits any of the crimes against person, employing means, CRIMINAL LAW COMMITTEE CHAIRPERSON: Mark David Martinez EDP: Elaine Masukat ASSISTANTS: Catherine Danao, Alert Rodri!uez, Claro Re!ino Sa"#a!a, $izelle %ou Caahu!, Mar& 'aren (uizon, %eo San )uan, Ma* +i,toria -a"ao, R&an %ita, .a&ani .rillante, )r* 25 2005 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS
methods or forms in the e.ecution thereof which tend directly and specially to insure its e.ecution, without ris1 to himself arising from the defense which the offended party might ma1e. RE=UISITES OF TREACHERY: 1. #hat at the time of the attac1, the victim was not in a position to defend himself9 and (. #hat the offender consciously adopted the particular means, method or form of attac1 employed by him. #he test of treachery is not only the relative position of the parties but, more specifically, whether or not the victim was forewarned or afforded the opportunity to ma1e a defense or to ward off the attac1. RULES REGAR&ING TREACHERY: 1. Applicable only to crimes against persons. (. 8eans, methods or forms need not insure accomplishment of crime. 2. #he mode of attac1 must be consciously adopted. #reachery is ta1en into account even if the crime against the person is comple.ed with another felony involving a different classification in the !ode. Accordingly, in the special comple. crime of robbery with homicide, treachery but can be appreciated insofar as the 1illing is concerned. #he suddenness of attac1 does not, of itself, suffice to support a finding of alevosia, even if the purpose was to 1ill, so long as the decision was made all of a sudden and the victim's helpless position was accidental. #reachery must be appreciated in the 1illing of a child even if the manner of attac1 is not shown. %t e.ists in the commission of the crime when the adult person illegally attac1s a child of tender years and causes his death. WHEN MUST TREACHERY BE PRESENT: -hen the aggression is continuous, treachery must be present in the beginning of the assault. (PEOPLE vs. ;A%ALA>" #$ %o. &+693'" August &," +**+- #hus, even if the deceased was shot while he was lying wounded on the ground, it appearing that the firing of the shot was a mere continuation of the assault in which the deceased was wounded, with no apprecia/le time intervening between the delivery of the blows and the firing of the shot, it cannot be said that the crime was attended by treachery. -hen the assault was not continuous" in that there was interruption, it is sufficient that treachery was present at the moment the fatal blow was given. <ence, even though in the inception of the aggression which ended in the death of the deceased, treachery was not present, if there was a /rea1 in the continuit0 of the aggression and at the time of the fatal wound was inflicted on the deceased he was defenseless" the circumstance of treacher0 must /e ta1en into account. ALEVOSIA SHOUL& BE CONSI&ERE& EVEN IF: 1. #he victim was not predetermined but there was a generic intent to treacherously 1ill any first two persons belonging to a class. (#he same rule obtains for evident premeditation". 2. #here was a/erratio ictus and the bullet hit a person different from that intended. (#he rule is different in evident premeditation". 3. #here was error in personae, hence the victim was not the one intended by the accused. (A different rule is applied in evident premeditation". 2005 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS EEC!TI"E COMMITTEE AND S!B#ECT C$AIRPERSONS Ma%&'el A(a%en)o* /Over0all Chair#erson1, Ronald #al+an,a% /Over0all +i,e Chair1, Yolanda Tolen)&no/+C0A,ads1, )enn&fe% Ang/+C0 Se,retariat1, #o- Ind.')&/o /+C02inan,e1, Ela&ne Ma*.0a) /+C0 EDP1, Anna Ma%ga%&)a E%e* /+C0%o!isti,s1 #ona)1an Mang.nda-ao /Politi,al %a31, 2%an'&* Bened&') Reo).)a% /%aor %a31, Ro+.ald Pad&lla /Civil %a31, C1a%+a&ne To%%e* /Ta4ation %a31, Ma%0 Da/&d Ma%)&ne, /Cri"inal %a31, 3a%n- L.&*a Aleg%e /Co""er,ial %a31, #&n0- Ann !- /Re"edial %a31, #a'0&e Lo. Ba.)&*)a /%e!al Ethi,s1 San Beda College of Law 25 MEMORY AID IN CRIMINAL LAW REASON FOR THE RULE3 -hen there is treachery, it is impossible for either the intended victim or the actual victim to defend himself against the aggression. TREACHERY ABSORBS: 1. !raft (. Abuse of superior strength 2. 7mploying means to wea1en the defense 4. !uadrilla (@bandA" /. Aid of armed men >. ighttime Par. 1) That means be employed or circumstances brought about which add ignominy to the natural effects of the act. I:$%7!$< 6 is a circumstance pertaining to the moral order, which adds disgrace and oblo4uy to the material injury caused by the crime. MEANING OF /E'!6' a88 !:$%7!$< % 'e $a3ra# e44e6) 'ere%41 #he means employed or the circumstances brought about must tend to ma1e the effects of the crime more humiliating to victim or to put the offended party to shame, or add to his moral suffering. #hus it is incorrect to appreciate ignominy where the victim was already dead when his body was dismembered, for such act may not be considered to have added to the victim's moral suffering or humiliation. (People vs. 4armina" #.$. %o. 6&,*," <anuar0 +6" &33&- Applicable to crimes against chastity, less serious physical injuries, light or grave coercion, and murder. Par. 1+ That the crime be committed after an unlawful entry. U$#aE43# e$r< 6 when an entrance is effected by a way not intended for the purpose. 5nlawful entry must be a means to effect entrance and not for escape. REASON FOR AGGRAVATION: *ne who acts, not respecting the walls erected by men to guard their property and provide for their personal safety, shows a greater perversity, a greater audacity9 hence, the law punishes him with more severity. Par. 1, That as a means to the commission of a crime" a wall" roof" floor" door" or window be broken. #his circumstance is aggravating only in those cases where the offender resorted to any of said means to enter the house. %f the wall, etc., is bro1en in order to get out of the place, it is not an aggravating circumstance. PAR. ,C PAR. ,B %t involves the brea1ing (rompimiento" of the enumerated parts of the house. Presupposes that there is no such brea1ing as by entry through the window. %f the offender bro1e a window to enable himself to reach a purse with money on the table near that window, which he too1 while his body was outside of the building, the crime of theft was attended by this aggravating circumstance. %t is not necessary that the offender should have entered the building. Par. 2- That the crime be committed 1! with the aid of persons under fifteen years of age" or 2! by means of motor vehicles" airships" or other similar means. TWO &IFFERENT CIRCUMSTANCES GROUPE& IN THIS PARAGRAPH: 1. -ith the aid of persons under fifteen years of age3 #ends to repress, so far as possible, the fre4uent practice resorted to by professional criminals to avail themselves of CRIMINAL LAW COMMITTEE CHAIRPERSON: Mark David Martinez EDP: Elaine Masukat ASSISTANTS: Catherine Danao, Alert Rodri!uez, Claro Re!ino Sa"#a!a, $izelle %ou Caahu!, Mar& 'aren (uizon, %eo San )uan, Ma* +i,toria -a"ao, R&an %ita, .a&ani .rillante, )r* 26 2005 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS
minors ta1ing advantage of their irresponsi/ilit0. 2. 0y means of motor vehicles, airships, or other similar means3 %ntended to counteract the great facilities found by modern criminals in said means to commit crime and flee and a/scond once the same is committed. 5se of motor vehicle is aggravating where the accused purposel0 and deli/eratel0 used the motor vehicle in going to the place of the crime, in carrying away the effects thereof, and in facilitating their escape. MEANING OF /%r %'er )!7!#ar 7ea$)1 &hould be understood as referring to motori5ed vehicles or other efficient means of transportation similar to automobile or airplane. Par. 21 That the wrong done in the commission of the crime be deliberately augmented by causing other wrong not necessary for its commission. Cr3e#< 6 there is cruelty when the culprit en=o0s and delights in ma1ing his victim suffer slowly and gradually, causing unnecessary physical pain in the consummation of the criminal act. RE=UISITES OF CRUELTY: 1. #hat the injury caused be deli/eratel0 increased by causing other wrong9 2. #hat the other wrong be unnecessar0 for the e.ecution of the purpose of the offender. !ruelty is not inherent in crimes against persons. %n order for it to be appreciated, there must be positive proof that the wounds found on the body of the victim were inflicted while he was still alive in order unnecessarily to prolong physical suffering. %f the victim was already dead when the acts of mutilation were being performed, this would also 4ualify the 1illing to murder due to outraging of his corpse. IGNOMINY *PAR.,A. CRUELTY *PAR. 2,. %nvolves moral suffering )efers to physical suffering 5nli1e mitigating circumstances (par. 1?, Art. 12", there is no provision for aggravating circumstances of a similar or analogous character. ART. ,G ALTERNATIVE CIRCUMSTANCES A#er$a!9e 6!r637)a$6e) 6 are those which must be ta1en into consideration as aggravating or mitigating according to the nature and effects of the crime and the other conditions attending its commission. BASIS: #he nature and effects of the crime and the other conditions attending its commission. THE ALTERNATIVE CIRCUMSTANCES ARE: 1. )elationship9 (. %nto.ication9 and 2. =egree of instruction and education of the offender. RELATIONSHIP #he alternative circumstance of relationship shall be ta1en into consideration when the offended party is the 6 a" &pouse, b" Ascendant, c" =escendant, d" $egitimate, natural, or adopted brother or sister, or e" )elative by affinity in the same degree of the offender. OTHER RELATIVES INCLU&E&: 2005 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS EEC!TI"E COMMITTEE AND S!B#ECT C$AIRPERSONS Ma%&'el A(a%en)o* /Over0all Chair#erson1, Ronald #al+an,a% /Over0all +i,e Chair1, Yolanda Tolen)&no/+C0A,ads1, )enn&fe% Ang/+C0 Se,retariat1, #o- Ind.')&/o /+C02inan,e1, Ela&ne Ma*.0a) /+C0 EDP1, Anna Ma%ga%&)a E%e* /+C0%o!isti,s1 #ona)1an Mang.nda-ao /Politi,al %a31, 2%an'&* Bened&') Reo).)a% /%aor %a31, Ro+.ald Pad&lla /Civil %a31, C1a%+a&ne To%%e* /Ta4ation %a31, Ma%0 Da/&d Ma%)&ne, /Cri"inal %a31, 3a%n- L.&*a Aleg%e /Co""er,ial %a31, #&n0- Ann !- /Re"edial %a31, #a'0&e Lo. Ba.)&*)a /%e!al Ethi,s1 San Beda College of Law 27 MEMORY AID IN CRIMINAL LAW 1. #he relationship of stepfather or stepmother and stepson or stepdaughter. )7A&*3 %t is the duty of the stepparents to bestow upon their stepchildren a mother'sHfather's affection, care and protection. (. #he relationship of adopted parent and adopted child. 0ut the relationship of uncle and niece is not covered by any of the relationship mentioned. WHEN RELATIONSHIP MITIGATING AN& WHEN AGGRAVATING: 1. As a rule, relationship is mitigating in crimes against property, by analogy to the provisions of Art. 22(. #hus, relationship is mitigating in the crimes of robbery (Arts. (F4-2?(", usurpation (Art. 21(", fraudulent insolvency (Art. 214" and arson (Arts. 2(1-2((, 2(/- 2(>". 2. %n crimes against persons 6 a" %t is aggravating where the offended party is a relative of I. a higher degree than the offender, or II. when the offender and the offended party are relatives of the same level (e.g. brothers" b" 0ut when it comes to physical injuries3 i. %t is aggravating when the crime involves serious ph0sical in=uries (Art. (>2", even if the offended party is a descendant of the offender. 0ut the serious physical injuries must not be inflicted by a parent upon his child by e.cessive chastisement. ii. %t is mitigating when the offense committed is less serious ph0sical in=uries or slight ph0sical in=uries, if the offended party is a relative of a lower degree. iii. %t is aggravating if the offended party is a relative of a higher degree of the offender. c" -hen the crime is homicide or murder, relationship is aggravating even if the victim of the crime is a relative of a lower degree. d" %n rape, relationship is aggravating where a stepfather raped his stepdaughter or in a case where a father raped his own daughter. 3. %n crimes against chastity, li1e acts of lasciviousness (Art. 22>", relationship is always aggravating, regardless of whether the offender is a relative of a higher or lower degree of the offended party. -hen the 4ualification given to the crime is derived from the relationship between the offender and the offended party, it is neither mitigating nor aggravating, because it is insepara/le from and inherent in the offense. (e.g. parricide, adultery and concubinage". WHEN INTOXICATION MITIGATING AN& WHEN AGGRAVATING: 1. 8itigating 6 i. %f into.ication is not ha/itual, or ii. %f into.ication is not su/se?uent to the plan to commit a felony. (. Aggravating 6 i. %f into.ication is ha/itual, or ii. %f it is intentional (subse4uent to the plan to commit a felony". TO BE ENTITLE& TO THE MITIGATING CIRCUMSTANCE OF INTOXICATION0 IT MUST BE SHOWN: 1. #hat at the time of the commission of the criminal act, the accused has ta1en such 4uantity of alcoholic drin1s as to blur his reason and deprive him of a certain degree of control, and (. #hat such into.ication is not habitual, or subse4uent to the plan to commit the felony. #o be mitigating, the accused's state of into.ication must be proved. *nce into.ication is established by satisfactory evidence, in the absence CRIMINAL LAW COMMITTEE CHAIRPERSON: Mark David Martinez EDP: Elaine Masukat ASSISTANTS: Catherine Danao, Alert Rodri!uez, Claro Re!ino Sa"#a!a, $izelle %ou Caahu!, Mar& 'aren (uizon, %eo San )uan, Ma* +i,toria -a"ao, R&an %ita, .a&ani .rillante, )r* 28 2005 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS
of proof to the contrary, it is presumed to be non-habitual or unintentional. I$)r36!%$ %r e836a!%$ 6 as an alternative circumstance, does not refer only to literary but more to the level of intelligence of the accused. - refers to the lac1 of sufficient intelligence and 1nowledge of the full significance of one's acts. - $ow degree of instruction and education or lac1 of it is generally mitigating. <igh degree of instruction and education is aggravating, when the offender too1 advantage of his learning in committing the crime. GENERAL RULE: $ac1 of sufficient education is mitigating. EXCEPTIONS: 1. !rimes against property (e.g. arson, estafa, theft, robbery" (. !rimes against chastity, and 2. #reason 6 because love of country should be a natural feeling of every citiBen, however unlettered or uncultured he may be. TITLE TWO: PERSONS CRIMINALLY LIABLE FOR FELONIES ART. ,> WHO ARE CRIMINALLY LIABLE FOR GRAVE AN& LESS GRAVE FELONIES 1. Principals (. Accomplices 2. Accessories FOR LIGHT FELONIES 1. Principals (. Accomplices Accessories are not liable for light felonies. )7A&*3 %n the commission of light felonies, the social wrong as well as the individual pre=udice is so small that penal sanction is deemed not necessary for accessories. #he classification of the offenders as principal, accomplice, or an accessory is essential under the )P!. #he classification maybe applied to special laws only if the latter provides for the same graduated penalties as those provided under the )P!. TWO PARTIES IN ALL CRIMES 1. Active subject (the criminal" Art. 1> enumerates the active subjects of the crime. (. Passive subject (the injured party" %s the holder of the injured right3 the man, the juristic person, the group, and the &tate. *nly natural persons can be the active subject of crime because of the highl0 personal nature of the criminal responsibility. <owever, corporation and partnership can be a passive subject of a crime. !orpses and animals cannot be passive subjects because they have no rights that may be injured. 7;!7P#%*3 5nder Art. (/2, the crime of defamation may be committed if the imputation tends to blac1en the memory of one who is dead. #his article applies only when the offenders are to be judged by their individual, and not collective, liability. ART. ,A PRINCIPALS THE FOLLOWING ARE PRINCIPALS: 1. #hose who ta1e a direct part in the e.ecution of the act (P)%!%PA$ 0M =%)7!# PA)#%!%PA#%*" (. #hose who directly force or induce others to commit it (P)%!%PA$ 0M %=5!#%*" 2005 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS EEC!TI"E COMMITTEE AND S!B#ECT C$AIRPERSONS Ma%&'el A(a%en)o* /Over0all Chair#erson1, Ronald #al+an,a% /Over0all +i,e Chair1, Yolanda Tolen)&no/+C0A,ads1, )enn&fe% Ang/+C0 Se,retariat1, #o- Ind.')&/o /+C02inan,e1, Ela&ne Ma*.0a) /+C0 EDP1, Anna Ma%ga%&)a E%e* /+C0%o!isti,s1 #ona)1an Mang.nda-ao /Politi,al %a31, 2%an'&* Bened&') Reo).)a% /%aor %a31, Ro+.ald Pad&lla /Civil %a31, C1a%+a&ne To%%e* /Ta4ation %a31, Ma%0 Da/&d Ma%)&ne, /Cri"inal %a31, 3a%n- L.&*a Aleg%e /Co""er,ial %a31, #&n0- Ann !- /Re"edial %a31, #a'0&e Lo. Ba.)&*)a /%e!al Ethi,s1 San Beda College of Law 29 MEMORY AID IN CRIMINAL LAW 2. #hose who cooperate in the commission of the offense by another act without which it would not have been accomplished (P)%!%PA$ 0M %=%&P7&A0$7 !**P7)A#%*". Par. 1 Principals by direct participation RE=UISITES: 1. #hat they participated in the criminal resolution9 and 2. #hat they carried out their plan and personall0 too1 part in its e.ecution by acts which directl0 tended to the same end. MEANING OF /(er)%$a##< %%5 (ar !$ !) eFe63!%$1 #hat the principal by direct participation must be at the scene of the commission of the crime, personally ta1ing part in its e.ecution. Par. 2 Principals by induction RE=UISITES 1. #hat the inducement be made directly with the intention of procuring the commission of the crime9 and (. #hat such inducement be the determining cause of the commission of the crime by the material e.ecutor. *ne cannot be held guilty of having instigated the commission of the crime without first being shown that the crime was actually committed (or attempted" by another. #hus, there can be no principal by inducement (or by indispensable cooperation" unless there is a principal by direct participation. 0ut there can be a principal by direct participation without a principal by inducement (or by indispensable cooperation". TWO WAYS OF BECOMING PRINCIPAL BY IN&UCTION: 1. 0y directly forcing another to commit a crime by 6 a" 5sing irresistible force. b" !ausing uncontrollable fear. %n these cases, there is no conspiracy, not even a unity of criminal purpose and intention. *nly the one using the force or causing the fear is criminally liable. #he material e.ecutor is not criminally liable because of Art. 1(, pars. / and > (e.empting circumstances" (. 0y directly inducing another to commit a crime by 6 a" ,iving of price, or offering of reward or promise. #he one giving the price or offering the reward or promise is a principal by inducement while the one committing the crime in consideration thereof is a principal by direct participation. #here is collective criminal responsibility. b" 5sing words of command #he person who used the words of command is a principal by inducement while the person who committed the crime because of the words of command is a principal by direct participation. #here is also collective criminal responsibility. #he inducement must precede the act induced and must be so influential in producing the criminal act that without it, the act would not have been performed. %f the person who actually committed the crime had reason of his own to commit the crime, it cannot be said that the inducement was influential in producing the criminal act. PRINCIPAL BY IN&UCEMENT OFFEN&ER WHO MA&E PROPOSAL TO COMMIT A FELONY CRIMINAL LAW COMMITTEE CHAIRPERSON: Mark David Martinez EDP: Elaine Masukat ASSISTANTS: Catherine Danao, Alert Rodri!uez, Claro Re!ino Sa"#a!a, $izelle %ou Caahu!, Mar& 'aren (uizon, %eo San )uan, Ma* +i,toria -a"ao, R&an %ita, .a&ani .rillante, )r* 40 2005 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS
I$ "%' #here is an inducement to commit a crime W'e$ #!a"#e 0ecomes liable only when the crime is committed by the principal by direct participation. #he mere proposal to commit a felony is punishable in treason or rebellion. <owever, the person to whom the proposal is made should not commit the crime, otherwise, the proponent becomes a principal by inducement. W'a 5!$8 %4 6r!7e !$9%#9e8 %nvolves any crime #he proposal to be punishable must involve only treason or rebellion. EFFECTS OF AC=UITTAL OF PRINCIPAL BY &IRECT PARTICIPATION UPON LIABILITY OF PRINCIPAL BY IN&UCEMENT: 1. !onspiracy is negatived by the ac4uittal of co-defendant. (. *ne cannot be held guilty of having instigated the commission of a crime without first being shown that the crime has been actually committed by another. 0ut if the one charged as principal by direct participation is ac4uitted because he acted without criminal intent or malice, his ac4uittal is not a ground for the ac4uittal of the principal by inducement. )7A&* +*) #<7 )5$73 %n e.empting circumstances, such as when the act is not voluntary because of lac1 of intent on the part of the accused, there is a crime committed, only that the accused is not a criminal. Par. 3 Principal by indispensable cooperation RE=UISITES: 1. Participation in the criminal resolution, that is, there is either anterior conspiracy or unity of criminal purpose and intention immediately before the commission of the crime charged9 and 2. 4ooperation in the commission of the offense by performing another act, without which it would not have been accomplished. MEANING OF /6%%(era!%$ !$ 'e 6%77!))!%$ %4 'e %44e$)e1 8eans to desire or wish in common a thing. 0ut that common will or purpose does not necessarily mean previous understanding, for it can be e.plained or inferred from the circumstances of each case. %f the cooperation is not indispensable, the offender is only an accomplice. COLLECTIVE CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY #his is present when the offenders are criminally liable in the same manner and to the same e.tent. #he penalty to be imposed must be the same for all. Principals by direct participation have collective criminal responsibility. Principals by induction, e.cept those who directly forced another to commit a crime, and principals by direct participation have collective criminal responsibility. Principals by indispensable cooperation have collective criminal responsibilities with the principals by direct participation. IN&IVI&UAL CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY %n the absence of any previous conspiracy, unity of criminal purpose and intention immediately before the commission of the crime, or community of criminal design, the criminal responsibility arising from different acts directed against one and the same person is individual 2005 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS EEC!TI"E COMMITTEE AND S!B#ECT C$AIRPERSONS Ma%&'el A(a%en)o* /Over0all Chair#erson1, Ronald #al+an,a% /Over0all +i,e Chair1, Yolanda Tolen)&no/+C0A,ads1, )enn&fe% Ang/+C0 Se,retariat1, #o- Ind.')&/o /+C02inan,e1, Ela&ne Ma*.0a) /+C0 EDP1, Anna Ma%ga%&)a E%e* /+C0%o!isti,s1 #ona)1an Mang.nda-ao /Politi,al %a31, 2%an'&* Bened&') Reo).)a% /%aor %a31, Ro+.ald Pad&lla /Civil %a31, C1a%+a&ne To%%e* /Ta4ation %a31, Ma%0 Da/&d Ma%)&ne, /Cri"inal %a31, 3a%n- L.&*a Aleg%e /Co""er,ial %a31, #&n0- Ann !- /Re"edial %a31, #a'0&e Lo. Ba.)&*)a /%e!al Ethi,s1 San Beda College of Law 41 MEMORY AID IN CRIMINAL LAW and not collective, and each of the participants is liable only for the act committed by him. ART. ,B ACCOMPLICES Accomplices are persons who, not acting as principals, cooperate in the e.ecution of the offense by previous and simultaneous acts, which are not indispensable to the commission of the crime. #hey act as mere instruments who perform acts not essential to the perpetration of the offense. RE=UISITES: 1. #hat there be community of design9 that is, 1nowing the criminal design of the principal by direct participation, he concurs with the latter his purpose9 (. #hat he cooperates in the e.ecution of the offense by previous or simultaneous acts, with the intention of supplying material or moral aid in the e.ecution of the crime in an efficacious way9 and 2. #hat there be a relation between the acts done by the principal and those attributed to the person charged as an accomplice. 0efore there could be an accomplice, there must be a principal by direct participation. #he person charged as an accomplice should not have inflicted a mortal wound. %f he inflicted a mortal wound, he becomes a principal by direct participation. %n case of doubt, the participation of the offender will be considered that of an accomplice rather than that of a principal. ART. ,C ACCESSORIES Accessories are those who 6 - having 1nowledge of the commission of the crime, and - without having participated therein either as principals or accomplices, ta1e part subse4uent to its commission in any of the following acts3 1. 0y profiting themselves or assisting the offender to profit by the effects of the crime. (. Assisting the offender to profit by the effects of the crime. 2. 0y concealing or destroying the body of the crime to prevent its discovery. %n profiting by the effects of the crime, the accessory must receive the property from the principal. <e should not ta1e it without the consent of the principal. %f he too1 it without the consent of the principal, he is not an accessory but a principal in the crime of theft. TWO CLASSES OF ACCESSORIES CONTEMPLATE& IN PAR. + OF ART. ,C a" Public officers who harbor, conceal or assist in the escape of the principal of any crime (not light felony" with abuse of his public functions. Re23!)!e): 1. #he accessory is a public officer. (. <e harbors, conceals, or assists in the escape of the principal. 2. #he public officer acts with abuse of his public functions. 4. #he crime committed by the principal is any crime, provided it is not a light felony. b" Private persons who harbor, conceal or assist in the escape of the author of the crime who is guilty of treason, parricide, murder, or attempts against the life of the President, or who is 1nown to be habitually guilty of some other crime. Re23!)!e): 1. #he accessory is a private person. (. <e harbors, conceals or assists in the escape of the author of the crime. 2. #he crime committed by the principal is either3 CRIMINAL LAW COMMITTEE CHAIRPERSON: Mark David Martinez EDP: Elaine Masukat ASSISTANTS: Catherine Danao, Alert Rodri!uez, Claro Re!ino Sa"#a!a, $izelle %ou Caahu!, Mar& 'aren (uizon, %eo San )uan, Ma* +i,toria -a"ao, R&an %ita, .a&ani .rillante, )r* 42 2005 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS
i. #reason, ii. Parricide, iii. 8urder, iv. An attempt against the life of the President, or v. #hat the principal is 1nown to be habitually guilty of some other crime. -here the alleged principal is ac4uitted, it is neither proper nor possible to convict the defendant as an accessory. #he responsibility of the accessory is subordinate to that of the principal in a crime <*-7:7), conviction of an accessory is possible notwithstanding the ac4uittal of the principal, if the crime was in fact committed, but the principal was not held liable, because of an e.empting circumstance (Art. 1(", such as insanity or minority. either the letter nor the spirit of the law re4uires that the principal be convicted before one may be punished as an accessory. As long as the corpus delicti is proved and the accessory's participation as such is shown, he can be held criminally responsible and meted out the corresponding penalty (7novero vs. 4oronel" 4A" )9 O.#. '&)*-. #he prescribed acts of the accessory under par. ( must have been intended to prevent the discovery of the crime, hence, mere silence does not ma1e one an accessory. %f, however, the crime involved is a conspiracy to commit treason, his silence may hold him liable for misprision of treason (Art. 11>" but as a principal thereof. -here the accused misleads the authorities by giving them false information, such act is e4uivalent to concealment and he should be held as an accessory. A$!-Fe$6!$: LaE %4 ,CAC Pre). &e6ree ,>,2 +encing 6 is an act, with intent to gain, of buying, selling, receiving, possessing, 1eeping, or in any other manner dealing in anything of value which a person 1nows or should have 1nown to be derived from the proceeds of the crime of robbery or theft. +ence 6 is a person who commits the act of fencing. A fence who receives stolen property as above-provided is not an accessory but a principal in the crime defined in and punished by the Anti- +encing $aw. 8ere possession of anything of value which has been the subject of robbery or theft shall be prima facie evidence of fencing. ART. 2- ACCESSORIES WHO ARE EXEMPT FROM CRIMINAL LIABLITY #he e.emption provided for in this article is based on the ties of blood and the preservation of the cleanliness of one's name, which compels one to conceal crimes committed by relatives so near as those mentioned in this article. AN ACCESSORY IS EXEMPT FROM CRIMINAL LIABLITY WHEN THE PRINCIPAL IS HIS 1. spouse, or (. ascendant, or 2. descendant, or 4. legitimate, natural or adopted brother, sister or relative by affinity within the same degree. ACCESSORY IS NOT EXEMPT FROM CRIMINAL LIABILITY EVEN IF THE PRINCIPAL IS RELATE& TO HIM0 IF SUCH ACCESSORY 1. profited by the effects of the crime, or (. assisted the offender to profit by the effects of the crime. )7A&*3 0ecause such acts are prompted not by affection but by a detestable greed. Public officer contemplated in par. 2 of Art. 1F is e.empt by reason of 2005 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS EEC!TI"E COMMITTEE AND S!B#ECT C$AIRPERSONS Ma%&'el A(a%en)o* /Over0all Chair#erson1, Ronald #al+an,a% /Over0all +i,e Chair1, Yolanda Tolen)&no/+C0A,ads1, )enn&fe% Ang/+C0 Se,retariat1, #o- Ind.')&/o /+C02inan,e1, Ela&ne Ma*.0a) /+C0 EDP1, Anna Ma%ga%&)a E%e* /+C0%o!isti,s1 #ona)1an Mang.nda-ao /Politi,al %a31, 2%an'&* Bened&') Reo).)a% /%aor %a31, Ro+.ald Pad&lla /Civil %a31, C1a%+a&ne To%%e* /Ta4ation %a31, Ma%0 Da/&d Ma%)&ne, /Cri"inal %a31, 3a%n- L.&*a Aleg%e /Co""er,ial %a31, #&n0- Ann !- /Re"edial %a31, #a'0&e Lo. Ba.)&*)a /%e!al Ethi,s1 San Beda College of Law 44 MEMORY AID IN CRIMINAL LAW relationship to the principal, even if such public officer acted with abuse of his official functions. )7A&*3 #ies of blood or relationship constitutes a more powerful incentive than the call of duty. P.&. ,B2C penaliBes the act of any person who 1nowingly or willfully obstructs, impedes, frustrates or delays the apprehension of suspects and the investigation and prosecution of criminal cases. #he benefits of the e.ception in Art. (? do not apply to P= 1D(F. TITILE THREE: PENALTIES C'a(er O$e: Pe$a#!e) !$ Ge$era# *Ar). 2,-2;. Pe$a#< 6 is the suffering that is inflicted by the &tate for the transgression of the law. &IFFERENT DURI&ICAL CON&ITIONS OF PENALTY 1. 8ust be productive of suffering, without however affecting the integrity of the human personality. (. 8ust be commensurate with the offense 6 different crimes must be punished with different penalties. 2. 8ust be personal 6 no one should be punished for the crime of another. 4. 8ust be legal 6 it is the conse4uence of a judgment according to law. /. 8ust be certain 6 no one may escape its effects. >. 8ust be e4ual for all. E. 8ust be correctional. PURPOSE OF THE STATE IN PUNISHING CRIMES #he &tate has an e.istence of its own to maintain, a conscience to assert, and moral principles to be vindicated. Penal justice must therefore be e.ercised by the &tate in the service and satisfaction of a duty, and rests primarily on the moral rightfulness of the punishment inflicted. #he basis of the right to punish violations of penal law is the police power of the &tate. THEORIES DUSTIFYING PENALTY: 1. Prevention 6 to prevent or suppress the danger to the &tate arising from the criminal act of the offender. (. &elf-defense 6 so as to protect society from the threat and wrong inflicted by the criminal. 2. )eformation 6 the object of punishment in criminal cases is to correct and reform the offender. 4. 7.emplarity 6 the criminal is punished to serve as an e.ample to deter others from committing crimes. /. Lustice 6 that crime must be punished by the &tate as an act of retributive justice, a vindication of absolute right and moral law violated by the criminal. THREE-FOL& PURPOSE OF PENALTY UN&ER THE CO&E: 1. )etribution or e.piation 6 the penalty is commensurate with the gravity of the offense. (. !orrection or reformation 6 shown by the rules which regulate the e.ecution of the penalties consisting in deprivation of liberty. 2. &ocial defense 6 shown by its infle.ible severity to recidivists and habitual delin4uents. ART. 2, PENALTIES THAT MAY BE IMPOSE& A felony shall be punishable only by the penalty prescribed by law at the time of its commission. %t is a guaranty to the citiBen of this country that no acts of his, will be considered criminal until the ,overnment has made it so by law and has provided a penalty. )7A&*3 0ecause a law cannot be rationally obeyed unless it is CRIMINAL LAW COMMITTEE CHAIRPERSON: Mark David Martinez EDP: Elaine Masukat ASSISTANTS: Catherine Danao, Alert Rodri!uez, Claro Re!ino Sa"#a!a, $izelle %ou Caahu!, Mar& 'aren (uizon, %eo San )uan, Ma* +i,toria -a"ao, R&an %ita, .a&ani .rillante, )r* PRESJ 45 2005 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS
first shown, and a man cannot be e.pected to obey an order that has not been given. ART. 22 RETROACTIVE EFFECT OF PENAL LAWS ,77)A$ )5$73 Penal laws are applied prospectively. 7;!7P#%*3 -hen retrospective application will be favorable to the person guilty of a felony9 Provided that3 1. #he offender is *# a habitual criminal (delin4uent" under Art. >((/"9 2. #he new or amendatory law does *# provide against its retrospective application. Ha"!3a# 8e#!$23e$ 6 a person who, within a period of ten years from the date of his release or last conviction of the crimes of serious or less serious physical injuries, robbery, theft, estafa, or falsification, is found guilty of any said crimes a third time or oftener.
EX POST FACTO LAW An act which when committed was not a crime, cannot be made so by statute without violating the constitutional inhibition as to e. post facto laws. An e. post facto law is one which3 1. 8a1es criminal an act done before the passage of the law and which was innocent when done9 (. Aggravates a crime, or ma1es it greater than it was, when committed9 2. !hanges the punishment and inflicts a greater punishment than the law anne.ed to the crime when committed9 4. Alters the legal rules of evidence, and authoriBes conviction upon a less or different testimony than the law re4uired at the time of the commission of the offense9 /. Assumes to regulate civil rights and remedies only, in effect imposing a penalty or deprivation of a right for something which when done was lawful9 and >. =eprives a person accused of a crime of some lawful protection to which he has become entitled, such as the protection of a former conviction or ac4uittal, or a proclamation of amnesty. %f retroactive effect of a new law is justified, it shall apply to the defendant even if he is3 1. presently on trial for the offense9 2. has already been sentenced but service of which has not begun9 or 2. already serving sentence #he retroactive effect of criminal statutes does not apply to the culprit's civil liability. )7A&*3 #he rights of offended persons or innocent third parties are not within the gift of arbitrary disposal of the &tate. #he provisions of Art. (( are applicable even to special laws which provide more favorable conditions to the accused. Cr!7!$a# #!a"!#!< 3$8er 'e re(ea#e8 #aE )3")!)): 1. -hen the provisions of the former law are reenacted9 or #he right to punish offenses committed under an old penal law is not e.tinguished if the offenses are still punishable in the repealing penal law. (. -hen the repeal is by implication9 or -hen a penal law, which impliedly repealed an old law, is itself repealed, the repeal of the repealing law revives the prior penal law, unless the language of the repealing statute provides otherwise. %f the repeal is absolute, criminal liability is obliterated. 2. -hen there is a saving clause. 2005 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS EEC!TI"E COMMITTEE AND S!B#ECT C$AIRPERSONS Ma%&'el A(a%en)o* /Over0all Chair#erson1, Ronald #al+an,a% /Over0all +i,e Chair1, Yolanda Tolen)&no/+C0A,ads1, )enn&fe% Ang/+C0 Se,retariat1, #o- Ind.')&/o /+C02inan,e1, Ela&ne Ma*.0a) /+C0 EDP1, Anna Ma%ga%&)a E%e* /+C0%o!isti,s1 #ona)1an Mang.nda-ao /Politi,al %a31, 2%an'&* Bened&') Reo).)a% /%aor %a31, Ro+.ald Pad&lla /Civil %a31, C1a%+a&ne To%%e* /Ta4ation %a31, Ma%0 Da/&d Ma%)&ne, /Cri"inal %a31, 3a%n- L.&*a Aleg%e /Co""er,ial %a31, #&n0- Ann !- /Re"edial %a31, #a'0&e Lo. Ba.)&*)a /%e!al Ethi,s1 San Beda College of Law 45 MEMORY AID IN CRIMINAL LAW ART. 2+- EFFECT OF PAR&ON BY THE OFFEN&E& PARTY ,77)A$ )5$7 6 Pardon by the offended party does not e.tinguish the criminal liability of the offender. )7A&*3 A crime committed is an offense against the &tate. *nly the !hief 7.ecutive can pardon the offenders. 7;!7P#%* - Pardon by the offended party will bar criminal prosecution in the following crimes3 Adultery and !oncubinage (Art. 244, )P!" 6 7;P)7&& or %8P$%7= pardon must be given by offended party to 0*#< offenders. - Pardon must be given P)%*) to institution of criminal action. &eduction, Abduction, Acts of $asciviousness (Art. 244, )P!" 6 7;P)7&& pardon given by offended party or her parents or grandparents or guardian - Pardon must be given P)%*) to the institution of the criminal action. <owever, marriage between the offender and the offended party 7:7 A+#7) the institution of the criminal action or conviction of the offender will e.tinguish the criminal action or remit the penalty already imposed against the offender, his co-principals, accomplices and accessories after the fact. )ape (as amended by ).A. D2/2" - #he subse4uent valid marriage between the offender and the offended party shall e.tinguish criminal liability or the penalty imposed. %n case the legal husband is the offender, subse4uent forgiveness by the wife as offended party shall also produce the same effect. Pardon by the offended party under Art. 244 is *$M A 0A) to criminal prosecution9 it is *# a ground for e.tinguishment of criminal liability. evertheless, civil liability may be e.tinguished by the 7;)7&& -A%:7) of the offended party. AN OFFENSE CAUSES TWO CLASSES OF INDURIES: SOCIAL INDURY PERSONAL INDURY Produced by the disturbance and alarm which are the outcome of the offense. !aused to the victim of the crime who suffered damage either to his person, to his property, to his honor or to her chastity. %s sought to be repaired through the imposition of the corresponding penalty. %s repaired through indemnity. #he offended party cannot pardon the offender so as to relieve him of the penalty. #he offended party may waive the indemnity and the &tate has no reason to insist in its payment. ART. 2; MEASURES OF PREVENTION OR SAFETY WHICH ARE NOT CONSI&ERE& PENALTIES THE FOLLOWING ARE NOT CONSI&ERE& AS PENALTIES: 1. #he arrest and temporary detention of accused persons, as well as their detention by reason of insanity or imbecility, or illness re4uiring their confinement in a hospital. (. #he commitment of a minor to any of the institutions mentioned in Art. D? (now Art. 1F(, P= o. >?2" and for the purposes specified therein. 2. &uspension from the employment or public office during the trial or in order to institute proceedings. 4. +ines and other corrective measures which, in the e.ercise of their administrative or disciplinary CRIMINAL LAW COMMITTEE CHAIRPERSON: Mark David Martinez EDP: Elaine Masukat ASSISTANTS: Catherine Danao, Alert Rodri!uez, Claro Re!ino Sa"#a!a, $izelle %ou Caahu!, Mar& 'aren (uizon, %eo San )uan, Ma* +i,toria -a"ao, R&an %ita, .a&ani .rillante, )r* 46 2005 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS
powers, superior officials may impose upon their subordinates. /. =eprivation of rights and the reparations which the civil law may establish in penal form. Rea)%$) E'< 'e< are $% (e$a#!e): 1. 0ecause they are not imposed as a result of judicial proceedings. #hose mentioned in paragraphs 1, 2 and 4 are merely preventive measures before conviction of offenders. (. #he offender is not subjected to or made to suffer these measures in e.piation of or as punishment for a crime. Par. 1 does not refer to the confinement of an insane or imbecile who has not been arrested for a crime. %t refers to @accused personsA who are detained @by reason of insanity or imbecility.A Paragraphs 2 and 4 refer to administrative suspension and administrative fines and not to suspension or fine as penalties for violations of the )P!. #he deprivations of rights established in penal form by the civil laws is illustrated in the case of parents who are deprived of their parental authority if found guilty of the crime of corruption of their minor children, in accordance with Art. 22( of the !ivil !ode. -here a minor offender was committed to a reformatory pursuant to Art. D? (now, P= >?2", and while thus detained he commits a crime therein, he cannot be considered a 4uasi-recidivist since his detention was only a preventive measure, whereas a 4uasi-recidivism presupposes the commission of a crime during the service of the penalty for a previous crime.
C'a(er TE%: C#a))!4!6a!%$ %4 Pe$a#!e) *Ar). 2G-2>. ART. 2G PENALTIES WHICH MAY BE IMPOSE& #he scale in Art. (/ is only a general classification of penalties based on their severity, nature and subject matter. #he scale of penalties in Art. E? is provided for successive service of sentences imposed on the same accused, in consideration of their severity and natures. #he scales in Art. E1 are for the purpose of graduating the penalties by degrees in accordance with the rules in Art. >1. CLASSIFICATION OF PENALTIES UN&ER ARTICLE 2G: a" 0ased on their severity or gravity 1. !apital, (. Afflictive, 2. !orrectional, 4. $ight #his classification corresponds to the classification of felonies in Art. F, into grave, less grave and light. b" 0ased on their nature 1. Principal penalties 6 those e.pressly imposed by the court in the judgment of conviction. 8ay be further classified based on divisibility i. =ivisible 6 are those that have fi.ed duration and are divisible into three periods. ii. %ndivisible 6 are those which have no fi.ed duration. #hese are3 1" =eath 2) $eclusi.n perpetua 3) Perpetual absolute or special dis4ualification 4" Public censure 2005 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS EEC!TI"E COMMITTEE AND S!B#ECT C$AIRPERSONS Ma%&'el A(a%en)o* /Over0all Chair#erson1, Ronald #al+an,a% /Over0all +i,e Chair1, Yolanda Tolen)&no/+C0A,ads1, )enn&fe% Ang/+C0 Se,retariat1, #o- Ind.')&/o /+C02inan,e1, Ela&ne Ma*.0a) /+C0 EDP1, Anna Ma%ga%&)a E%e* /+C0%o!isti,s1 #ona)1an Mang.nda-ao /Politi,al %a31, 2%an'&* Bened&') Reo).)a% /%aor %a31, Ro+.ald Pad&lla /Civil %a31, C1a%+a&ne To%%e* /Ta4ation %a31, Ma%0 Da/&d Ma%)&ne, /Cri"inal %a31, 3a%n- L.&*a Aleg%e /Co""er,ial %a31, #&n0- Ann !- /Re"edial %a31, #a'0&e Lo. Ba.)&*)a /%e!al Ethi,s1 San Beda College of Law 47 MEMORY AID IN CRIMINAL LAW (. Accessory penalties 6 are those that are deemed included in the principal penalties. c" 0ased on subject matter 1. !orporal (death". (. =eprivation of freedom (reclusion, prision, arresto". 2. )estriction of freedom (destierro". 4. =eprivation of rights (dis4ualification and suspension". /. Pecuniary (fine". Perpetual or temporary absolute dis4ualification, perpetual or temporary special dis4ualification, and suspension may be principal or accessory penalties. 7;A8P$7&3 %. Perpetual absolute dis4ualification is a principal penalty in prevaricacion (Art. (?4" and perpetual special dis4ualification, in malversation (Art. (1E". %%. #emporary absolute dis4ualification is a principal penalty when the accessory acts with abuse of public functions (Art, 1FI2J and Art. /D" and temporary special dis4ualification, in direct bribery (Art. (?>". %%%. &uspension is a principal penalty in rendition of unjust interlocutory orders (Art. (?>". 0ond to 1eep the peace is imposed only in the crime of threats (Art. (D4", either grave (Art. (D(" or light (Art. (D2".
ART. 2> FINE WHEN AFFLICTIVE0 CORRECTIONAL OR LIGHT FINE IS: 1. Afflictive 6 over P>,???.?? (. !orrectional 6 P(??.?? to P>,???.?? 2. $ight penalty 6 less than P(??.?? &ame basis may be applied to 0ond to 1eep the peace by analogy. #his article determines the classification of a fine whether imposed as a single or as an alternative penalty for a crime. #he rule herein does not apply where the fine involved is in a compound penalty, that is, it is imposed in conjunction with another penalty. -here the fine in 4uestion is e.actly P(??, under Art. F it is a light felony, hence the felony involved is a light felony9 whereas under Art. (>, it is a correctional penalty, hence the offense involved is a less grave felony. %t has been held that this discrepancy should be resolved liberally in favor of the accused, hence Art. F prevails over Art. (> (People vs. @u Aai" 33 Phil. (+9-. <*-7:7), according to Lustice )egalado there is no such discrepancy. -hat is really in issue is the prescription of the offense vis:a: vis the prescription of the penalty, the former being the forfeiture of the right of the &tate to prosecute the offender and the latter being the loss of its power to enforce the judgment against the convict. C'a(er T'ree: &3ra!%$ a$8 E44e6) %4 Pe$a#!e) *Ar). 2A-;G. Se6!%$ O$e 3uration of Penalties ART. 2A &URATION OF EACH &IFFERENT PENALTIES 1. $eclusi.n perpetua 6 (? yrs. and 1 day to 4? yrs. 2. $eclusi.n temporal 6 1( yrs. and 1 day to (? yrs. 3. Prisi.n ma0or and temporary dis4ualification 6 > yrs. and 1 day to 1( yrs., e.cept when dis4ualification is an accessory penalty, in which case its duration is that of the principal penalty. 4. Prisi.n correccional" suspensi.n, and destierro 6 > mos. and 1 day to > yrs., e.cept when suspensiNn is an accessory penalty, in which case its CRIMINAL LAW COMMITTEE CHAIRPERSON: Mark David Martinez EDP: Elaine Masukat ASSISTANTS: Catherine Danao, Alert Rodri!uez, Claro Re!ino Sa"#a!a, $izelle %ou Caahu!, Mar& 'aren (uizon, %eo San )uan, Ma* +i,toria -a"ao, R&an %ita, .a&ani .rillante, )r* 48 2005 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS
duration is that of the principal penalty. 5. Arresto ma0or 6 1 mo. And 1 day to > mos. 6. Arresto menor 6 1 day to 2? days E. 0ond to 1eep the peace 6 the period during which the bond shall be effective is discretionary on the court. >estierro is a principal, correctional and divisible penalty. I$ E'a 6a)e) !) destierro !7(%)e8@ 1. &erious physical injuries or death under e.ceptional circumstances. (Art. (4E" (. %n case of failure to give bond for good behavior. (Art. (D4" 2. As a penalty for the concubine in concubinage. (Art. 224" 4. %n cases where after reducing the penalty by one or more degrees, destierro is the proper penalty. ART. 2B COMPUTATION OF PENALTIES 1. -hen the offender is in prison 6 the duration of temporary penalties is from the day on which the judgment of conviction becomes final. (. -hen the offender is not in prison 6 the duration of penalties consisting in deprivation of liberty, is from the day that the offender is placed at the disposal of judicial authorities for the enforcement of the penalty. 2. #he duration of other penalties 6 the duration is from the day on which the offender commences to serve his sentence. ART. 2C PERIO& OF PREVENTIVE IMPRISONMENT &E&UCTE& FROM TERM OF IMPRISONMENT Pre9e$!9e !7(r!)%$7e$ 6 is the period of detention undergone by an accused where the crime with which he is charged is non-bailable or, even if bailable, he is unable to post the re4uisite bail. #hese rules on preventive imprisonment apply to all sentences regardless of the duration thereof, including the so-called perpetual penalties as long as they involve deprivation of liberty. %t applies to destierro. W'e$ !) 'e 8ee$!%$ (r!)%$er e$!#e8 % 'e 43## 6re8! %4 '!) (re9e$!9e !7(r!)%$7e$@ %f the detention prisoner agrees voluntarily in writing to abide by the same disciplinary rules imposed upon convicted prisoners. W'e$ E!## 'e "e 6re8!e8 %$#< E!' 4%3r-4!4') 'e !7e 83r!$: E'!6' 'e 'a) 3$8er:%$e (re9e$!9e !7(r!)%$7e$@ %f the detention prisoner does not agree to abide by the same disciplinary rules imposed upon convicted prisoners. %n the case of a youthful offender who has been proceeded against under the !hild and Mouth -elfare !ode, he shall be credited in the service of his sentence with the full time of his actual detention, whether or not he agreed to abide by the same disciplinary rules of the institution. T'e 4%##%E!$: %44e$8er) are $% e$!#e8 % "e 6re8!e8 E!' 'e 43## !7e %r 4%3r-4!4') %4 'e !7e %4 (re9e$!9e !7(r!)%$7e$: 1. )ecidivists or those convicted previously twice or more times of any crime. (. #hose who, upon being summoned for the e.ecution of their sentence, failed to surrender voluntarily. <abitual delin4uents are included in o. 1. o. ( refers to convicts who failed to voluntarily surrender to serve their penalties under a final judgment, since this is indicative of a greater defiance of authority. %t does not refer to failure or refusal to 2005 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS EEC!TI"E COMMITTEE AND S!B#ECT C$AIRPERSONS Ma%&'el A(a%en)o* /Over0all Chair#erson1, Ronald #al+an,a% /Over0all +i,e Chair1, Yolanda Tolen)&no/+C0A,ads1, )enn&fe% Ang/+C0 Se,retariat1, #o- Ind.')&/o /+C02inan,e1, Ela&ne Ma*.0a) /+C0 EDP1, Anna Ma%ga%&)a E%e* /+C0%o!isti,s1 #ona)1an Mang.nda-ao /Politi,al %a31, 2%an'&* Bened&') Reo).)a% /%aor %a31, Ro+.ald Pad&lla /Civil %a31, C1a%+a&ne To%%e* /Ta4ation %a31, Ma%0 Da/&d Ma%)&ne, /Cri"inal %a31, 3a%n- L.&*a Aleg%e /Co""er,ial %a31, #&n0- Ann !- /Re"edial %a31, #a'0&e Lo. Ba.)&*)a /%e!al Ethi,s1 San Beda College of Law 49 MEMORY AID IN CRIMINAL LAW voluntarily surrender after the commission of the crime. Se6!%$ TE% 'ffects of the penalties according to their respective nature. A plebiscite is not mentioned or contemplated in Art.2?, par. ( (deprivation of the right to vote", hence, the offender may vote in that e.ercise, subject to the provisions of pertinent election laws at the time. Perpetual absolute dis4ualification is effective during the lifetime of the convict and even after the service of the sentence. #emporary absolute dis4ualification lasts during the term of the sentence, and is removed after the service of the same, 7;!7P#3 1" =eprivation of the public office or employment, and (" $oss of all rights to retirement pay or other pension for any office formerly held. 0ond to 1eep the peace is different from bail bond which is posted for the provisional release of a person arrested for or accused of a crime. CIVIL INTER&ICTION IN ART. +; IS IMPOSE& WHEN THE PENALTY IS: 1. =eath which is not carried out, 2. $eclusi.n perpetua,or 3. $eclusi.n temporal ART. +> PAR&ONH ITS EFFECTS EFFECTS OF PAR&ON BY THE PRESI&ENT 1. A pardon shall not restore the right to hold public office or the right of suffrage. 7;!7P#%*3 -hen any or both such rights isHare e.pressly restored by the terms of the pardon. (. %t shall not e.empt the culprit from the payment of the civil liability. LIMITATIONS UPON THE EXERCISE OF THE PAR&ONING POWER: 1. #hat the power can be e.ercised only after conviction @by final judgmentA9 (. #hat such power does not e.tend to cases of impeachment. GENERAL RULE: -hen the principal penalty is remitted by pardon, only the effect of that principal penalty is e.tinguished, but not the accessory penalties attached to it. EXCEPTION: -hen an absolute pardon is granted after the term of imprisonment has e.pired, it removes what is left of the conse4uences of conviction. PAR&ON BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE *ART. +>. PAR&ON BY OFFEN&E& PARTY *ART. 2+. A) % 'e 6r!7e 6%9ere8 !an e.tend to any crime, unless otherwise provided by or subject to conditions in the !onstitution or the laws. Applies only to crimes against chastity under the )P!. A) % eF!$:3!)'7e$ %4 6r!7!$a# #!a"!#!< 7.tinguishes criminal liability. =oes not e.tinguish criminal liability although it may constitute a bar to the prosecution of the offender. A % 'e e44e6 %$ 6!9!# #!a"!#!< !annot affect the civil liability e. delicto of the offender. #he offended party can waive the civil liability. W'e$ :ra$e8 !an be e.tended only after conviction by final judgment of the accused. !an be validly granted only before the institution of the criminal action. T% E'%7 :ra$e8 #o any or all of the accused %n adultery and concubinage, must include both offenders. A) % E'e'er ! 6a$ "e 6%$8!!%$a# CRIMINAL LAW COMMITTEE CHAIRPERSON: Mark David Martinez EDP: Elaine Masukat ASSISTANTS: Catherine Danao, Alert Rodri!uez, Claro Re!ino Sa"#a!a, $izelle %ou Caahu!, Mar& 'aren (uizon, %eo San )uan, Ma* +i,toria -a"ao, R&an %ita, .a&ani .rillante, )r* 50 2005 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS
8ay be absolute or conditional !annot validly be made subject to a condition. ART. +A COSTS C%)) %r 6%)) %4 )3! 6 are the e.penses of litigation allowed and regulated by the )ules of !ourt to be assessed against or to be recovered by a party in litigation. THE FOLLOWING ARE INCLU&E& IN COSTS: 1. +ees, and (. %ndemnities, in the course of judicial proceedings. Are chargeable to the accused only in cases of conviction. %n case of ac4uittal, the costs are de oficio, meaning each party bearing his own e.penses. #he payment of costs is a matter that rests entirely upon the discretion of courts. ART. +B - PECUNIARY LIABILITIES W'a are 'e (e63$!ar< #!a"!#!!e) %4 (er)%$) 6r!7!$a##< #!a"#e@ #hey are, in the following order3 1. #he reparation of the damage caused 2. %ndemnification of the conse4uential damages 2. +ine 4. !osts of proceedings. W'e$ !) Ar.+B a((#!6a"#e@ %n case the property of the offender should not be sufficient for the payment of all his pecuniary liabilities. ART. +C SUBSI&IARY PENALTY S3")!8!ar< (e$a#< 6 it is a subsidiary personal liability to be suffered by the convict who has no property with which to meet the fine, at the rate of one day for each eight pesos (PD.??", subject to the rules provided for in Art. 2F. &ubsidiary penalty shall be proper only if the accused has no property with which to pay the fine, and not as a matter of choice on his part by opting to go to jail instead of paying. &ubsidiary penalty is not an accessory penalty, hence it must be specifically imposed by the court in its judgment, otherwise the accused cannot be made to serve the corresponding subsidiary imprisonment. RULES AS TO SUBSI&IARY PENALTY 1. %f the penalty imposed is prisi.n correccional or arresto and fine 6 subsidiary imprisonment is not to e.ceed 1H2 of the term of the sentence, and in no case to continue for more than one year. +raction or part of a day, not counted. (. -hen the penalty imposed is fine only 6 subsidiary imprisonment a" not to e.ceed > months 6 if the culprit is prosecuted for grave or less grave felony, and b" not to e.ceed 1/ days 6 if prosecuted for light felony. 3. -hen the penalty imposed is higher than prisi.n correccional 6 no subsidiary imprisonment. 4. %f the penalty imposed is not to be e.ecuted by confinement, but of fi.ed duration 6 subsidiary penalty shall consist in the same deprivations as those of the principal penalty, under the same rules as nos. 1, ( and 2 above. /. %n case the financial circumstances of the convict should improve, he shall pay the fine, notwithstanding the fact that the convict suffered subsidiary personal liability therefor. -hen the penalty prescribed for the offense is imprisonment, it is the penalty actually imposed by the 2005 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS EEC!TI"E COMMITTEE AND S!B#ECT C$AIRPERSONS Ma%&'el A(a%en)o* /Over0all Chair#erson1, Ronald #al+an,a% /Over0all +i,e Chair1, Yolanda Tolen)&no/+C0A,ads1, )enn&fe% Ang/+C0 Se,retariat1, #o- Ind.')&/o /+C02inan,e1, Ela&ne Ma*.0a) /+C0 EDP1, Anna Ma%ga%&)a E%e* /+C0%o!isti,s1 #ona)1an Mang.nda-ao /Politi,al %a31, 2%an'&* Bened&') Reo).)a% /%aor %a31, Ro+.ald Pad&lla /Civil %a31, C1a%+a&ne To%%e* /Ta4ation %a31, Ma%0 Da/&d Ma%)&ne, /Cri"inal %a31, 3a%n- L.&*a Aleg%e /Co""er,ial %a31, #&n0- Ann !- /Re"edial %a31, #a'0&e Lo. Ba.)&*)a /%e!al Ethi,s1 San Beda College of Law 51 MEMORY AID IN CRIMINAL LAW !ourt, not the penalty provided for by the !ode, which should be considered in determining whether or not subsidiary penalty should be imposed.
NO SUBSI&IARY PENALTY SHALL BE IMPOSE& WHERE: 1. #he penalty imposed is higher than prisi.n correccional or > years, Additional penalty for habitual delin4uency should be included in determining whether or not subsidiary penalty should be imposed. (. +or non-payment of reparation or indemnification, 2. +or non-payment of costs, and 4. -here the penalty imposed is a fine and another penalty without fi.ed duration, li1e censure. #he rules on subsidiary penalty in Art. 2F are applicable to crimes punishable by special laws by force of Art. 1? of the !ode. Se6!%$ T'ree Penalties in which other accessory penalties are inherent OUTLINE OF ACCESSORY PENALTIES INHERENT IN PRINCIPAL PENALTIES 1. =eath, when not e.ecuted by reason of commutation or pardon i. Perpetual absolute dis4ualification, and ii. !ivil interdiction during 2? years, if not e.pressly remitted in the pardon. 2. $eclusi.n perpetua and reclusi.n temporal i. !ivil interdiction for life or during the sentence, and ii. Perpetual absolute dis4ualification, unless e.pressly remitted in the pardon of the principal penalty. 3. Prisi.n ma0or i. #emporary absolute dis4ualification, and ii. Perpetual special dis4ualification from suffrage, unless e.pressly remitted in the pardon of the principal penalty. 4. Prisi.n correccional i. &uspension from public office, profession or calling, and ii. Perpetual special dis4ualification from suffrage, if the duration of imprisonment e.ceeds 1D months, unless e.pressly remitted in the pardon of the principal penalty. #here is perpetual special dis4ualification from suffrage, only when the duration of the imprisonment e.ceeds 1D months. 5. Arresto 6 suspension of the right to hold office and the right of suffrage during the term of the sentence. #he !ode does not provide for any accessory penalty for destierro. RECLUSION PERPETUA LIFE IMPRISONMENT <as a specific duration of (? years and 1 day to 4? years and accessory penalties. <as no definite term or accessory penalties. %mposable on felonies punished by the )P!. %mposable on crimes punishable by special laws. ART. ;G CONFISCATION AN& FORFEITURE OF THE PROCEE&S OF THE CRIME OUTLINE OF THE PROVISION OF THIS ARTICLE 1. 7very penalty imposed carries with it the forfeiture of the proceeds of the crime and the instruments or tools used in the commission of the crime. (. #he proceeds and instruments or tools of the crime are confiscated and forfeited in favor of the ,overnment. CRIMINAL LAW COMMITTEE CHAIRPERSON: Mark David Martinez EDP: Elaine Masukat ASSISTANTS: Catherine Danao, Alert Rodri!uez, Claro Re!ino Sa"#a!a, $izelle %ou Caahu!, Mar& 'aren (uizon, %eo San )uan, Ma* +i,toria -a"ao, R&an %ita, .a&ani .rillante, )r* 52 2005 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS
2. Property of a third person not liable for the offense, is not subject to confiscation and forfeiture. 4. Property not subject of lawful commerce (whether it belongs to the accused or to third person" shall be destroyed. #he confiscation and forfeiture of the proceeds and instruments of a crime is an accessory penalty. T'e (r%9!)!%$) %4 Ar. ;G 6a$$% a((#< E'e$ 1. #he instruments belong to innocent third parties, (. &uch properties have not been placed under the jurisdiction of the court, and 2. -hen it is legally or physically impossible. #his accessory penalty presupposes a judgment of conviction. <owever, even if the accused is ac4uitted on reasonable doubt, but the instruments or proceeds are contraband, the judgment of ac4uittal shall order their forfeiture for appropriate disposition. C'a(er F%3r: A((#!6a!%$ %4 Pe$a#!e) *Ar). ;>-A2. Se6!%$ O$e .ules for application of penalties to the persons criminally liable and for the graduation of the same. ART. ;>. PENALTY TO BE IMPOSE& UPON PRINCIPALS IN GENERAL GENERAL RULE: #he penalty prescribed by law in general terms shall be imposed upon the principals for a consummated felony. EXCEPT: -hen the penalty to be imposed upon the principal in frustrated or attempted felony is fi.ed by law. GRA&UATION OF PENALTIES 1. 0M =7,)77& 6 refers to a) the stages of execution (consummated, frustrated, or attempted"9 and b) the degree of the criminal participation of the offender (whether as principal, accomplice or accessory". (. 0M P7)%*=& 6 refers to the proper period of the penalty which should be imposed when aggravating or mitigating circumstances attend the commission of the crime. ART. ;A CASES WHEREIN THE &EATH PENALTY SHALL NOT BE IMPOSE& 1. 5=7) A,7. -hen the offender is /elow &6 0ears of age at the time of the commission of the crime. 2. *:7) A,7. -hen the guilty person is more than sevent0 (E?" years of age. 3. * !*5)# 8AL*)%#M. -hen upon appeal or automatic review of the case by the &upreme !ourt, the vote of eight members is not o/tained for the imposition of the death penalty. Automatic review is available only in cases where death penalty is imposed ($.A. ()93-. CRIMES PUNISHABLE BY &EATH UN&ER THE &EATH PENALTY LAW *RA A>GC. 1. #reason (. Gualified Piracy 2. Gualified 0ribery 4. Parricide /. 8urder >. %nfanticide E. Oidnapping and &erious %llegal =etention D. )obbery 6 with <omicide, )ape, %ntentional 8utilation, or Arson F. )ape 6 with the use of a deadly weapon, or by two or more persons - where the victim became insane - with <omicide 1?. Gualified )ape 11. =estructive Arson 1(. Plunder 12. :iolation of certain provisions of the =angerous =rugs Act 14. !arnapping 2005 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS EEC!TI"E COMMITTEE AND S!B#ECT C$AIRPERSONS Ma%&'el A(a%en)o* /Over0all Chair#erson1, Ronald #al+an,a% /Over0all +i,e Chair1, Yolanda Tolen)&no/+C0A,ads1, )enn&fe% Ang/+C0 Se,retariat1, #o- Ind.')&/o /+C02inan,e1, Ela&ne Ma*.0a) /+C0 EDP1, Anna Ma%ga%&)a E%e* /+C0%o!isti,s1 #ona)1an Mang.nda-ao /Politi,al %a31, 2%an'&* Bened&') Reo).)a% /%aor %a31, Ro+.ald Pad&lla /Civil %a31, C1a%+a&ne To%%e* /Ta4ation %a31, Ma%0 Da/&d Ma%)&ne, /Cri"inal %a31, 3a%n- L.&*a Aleg%e /Co""er,ial %a31, #&n0- Ann !- /Re"edial %a31, #a'0&e Lo. Ba.)&*)a /%e!al Ethi,s1 San Beda College of Law 54 MEMORY AID IN CRIMINAL LAW ART. ;B COMPLEX CRIMES CONCEPT: 1. %n comple. crime, although ( or more crimes are actually committed, they constitute only one crime in the eyes of the law as well as in the conscience of the offender. 2. #he offender has only one criminal intent, hence there is only one penalt0 imposed for the commission of a comple. crime. TWO KIN&S OF COMPLEX CRIMES: 1. !*8P*5= !)%87 (delito compuesto" 6 a single act constitutes ( or more grave or less grave felonies. RE=UISITES: 1. #hat only a single act is performed by the offender9 2. #hat the single act produces3 (1" two or more grave felonies, or ((" one or more grave and one or more less grave felonies. 2. !*8P$7; !)%87 P)*P7) (delito comple=o" 6 an offense is a necessar0 means for committing the other. RE=UISITES: 1. #hat at least two offenses are committed9 2. #hat one or some of the offenses must be necessar0 to commit the other9 3. #hat both or all of the offenses must be punished under the same statute. NO COMPLEX CRIME IN THE FOLLOWING CASES 1. %n case of continuing crimes 2. -hen one offense is committed to conceal the other. 3. -hen the other crime is an indispensa/le part or an element of the other offenses. 4. -here one of the offenses is penaliBed by a special law. Art. 4D does not apply when the law provides one single penalty for special comple. crime. #hese include 6 )obbery with <omicide )obbery with )ape )ape with <omicide Oidnapping with &erious Physical %njuries Oidnapping with <omicide or 8urder #he penalty for comple. crime is the penalty for the most serious crime, the same to be applied in its ma.imum period. %f different crimes resulting from one single act are punished with the same penalty, the penalty for any one of them shall be imposed, the same to be applied in the ma.imum period. Art. 4D applies to crimes through negligence. 7.g.3 offender found guilty of a comple. crime of homicide with less serious physical injuries through rec1less imprudence. -hen ( felonies constituting a comple. crime are punishable by imprisonment and fine, respectively, only the penalty of imprisonment should be imposed. )7A&*3 fine is not included in the list of penalties in the order of severity, and it is the last in the graduated scales in Art. E1 of the )P!. Plurality of &rimes: consists in the successive e.ecution, by the same individual, of different criminal acts, upon any of which no conviction has yet been declared. KIN&S: 1. +*)8A$ *) %=7A$ P$5)A$%#M- only O%E 4$7;7%AL $%A0%$%#M. #<)77 ,)*5P& 5=7) #<7 +*)8A$ #MP73 a) -hen the offender commits any of the complex crimes in A)# 4D. CRIMINAL LAW COMMITTEE CHAIRPERSON: Mark David Martinez EDP: Elaine Masukat ASSISTANTS: Catherine Danao, Alert Rodri!uez, Claro Re!ino Sa"#a!a, $izelle %ou Caahu!, Mar& 'aren (uizon, %eo San )uan, Ma* +i,toria -a"ao, R&an %ita, .a&ani .rillante, )r* 55 2005 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS
b) -hen the law specifically fi.es a single penalty for two or more offenses committed. c) -hen the offender commits continuing crimes. (. )7A$ *) 8A#7)%A$ P$5)A$%#M - =%++7)7# !)%87& in law, as well as in the conscience of the offender9 the offender shall be P5%&<7= +*) 7A!< and every offense that he committed. CONTINUING CRIME is a single crime" consisting of a series of acts" but all arising from *7 !)%8%A$ )7&*$5#%*9 length of time in the commission is immaterial. REAL OR MATERIAL PLURALITY CONTINUE& CRIME 1. #here is a series of acts performed by the offender 1. #here is a series of acts performed by the offender (. 7ach act performed by the offender constitutes a separate crime, each act is generated by a criminal impulse (. #he different acts constitute only one crime, all of the acts performed arise from one criminal resolution ART. ;C PENALTY TO BE IMPOSE& UPON THE PRINCIPALS WHEN THE CRIME COMMITTE& IS &IFFERENT FROM THAT INTEN&E& RULES: 1. %f the penalty for the felony committed be higher than the penalty for the offense which the accused intended to commit, the lower penalty shall be imposed in its ma.imum period. 2. %f the penalty for the felony committed be lower than the penalty for the offense which the accused intended to commit, the lower penalty shall be imposed in its ma.imum period. 3. %f the act committed also constitutes an attempt or frustration of another crime, and the law prescribes a higher penalty for either of the latter, the penalty for the attempted or frustrated crime shall be imposed in its ma.imum period. ART. GC. PENALTY TO BE IMPOSE& IN CASE OF FAILURE TO COMMIT THE CRIME BECAUSE THE MEANS EMPLOYE& OR THE AIMS SOUGHT ARE IMPOSSIBLE #he penalty for impossible crime is Arresto ;a0or (imprisonment of 1 mo and 1 day to > mos" or fine ranging from (??-/??pesos. 0A&%& +*) #<7 %8P*&%#%* *+ P)*P7) P7A$#M 1. &ocial danger9 and (. =egree of criminality shown by the offender ART. >,. RULES OF GRA&UATING PENALTIES According to Arts. /?-/E, the penalty prescribed by law for the felony shall be lowered by one or two degrees, as follows3 1. +or the principal in frustrated felony 6 one degree lower9 (. +or the principal in attempted felony 6 two degrees lower9 2. +or the accomplice in consummated felony 6 one degree lower9 4. +or the accessory in consummated felony 6 two degrees lower9 &IAGRAM OF THE APPLICATION OF ARTS. G-- GA: CONSUM- MATE& FRUS- TRATE& ATTEMP- TE& Prin ? 1 ( Accom 1 ( 2 Acces ( 2 4 %n this diagram, @?A represents the penalty prescribed by law in defining a crime, which is to be imposed on the principal in a consummated offense, in accordance with the provisions of Art. >4. #he other figures represent the degrees to which the penalty must be lowered, to meet the different situations anticipated by law. 2005 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS EEC!TI"E COMMITTEE AND S!B#ECT C$AIRPERSONS Ma%&'el A(a%en)o* /Over0all Chair#erson1, Ronald #al+an,a% /Over0all +i,e Chair1, Yolanda Tolen)&no/+C0A,ads1, )enn&fe% Ang/+C0 Se,retariat1, #o- Ind.')&/o /+C02inan,e1, Ela&ne Ma*.0a) /+C0 EDP1, Anna Ma%ga%&)a E%e* /+C0%o!isti,s1 #ona)1an Mang.nda-ao /Politi,al %a31, 2%an'&* Bened&') Reo).)a% /%aor %a31, Ro+.ald Pad&lla /Civil %a31, C1a%+a&ne To%%e* /Ta4ation %a31, Ma%0 Da/&d Ma%)&ne, /Cri"inal %a31, 3a%n- L.&*a Aleg%e /Co""er,ial %a31, #&n0- Ann !- /Re"edial %a31, #a'0&e Lo. Ba.)&*)a /%e!al Ethi,s1 San Beda College of Law 55 MEMORY AID IN CRIMINAL LAW Se6!%$ TE% .ules for the application of penalties with regard to the mitigating and aggravating circumstances" and habitual delin*uency ART. >2. EFFECTS OF THE ATTEN&ANCE OF MITIGATING OR AGGRAVATING CIRCUMSTANCES AN& OF HABITUAL &ELI=UENCY EFFECTS: 1. Aggravating circumstances (generic and specific" have the effect of increasing the penalty, without however e.ceeding the ma.imum period provided by law. 2. ;itigating circumstances have the effect of diminishing the penalty. 3. Aa/itual delin?uenc0 has the effect, not only of increasing the penalty because of recidivism which is generally implied in habitual delin4uency, but also of imposing an additional penalty. RE=UISITES OF HABITUAL &ELI=UENCY: 1. that the offender had been convicted of any of the crimes of serious or less serious physical injuries, robbery, theft, estafa or falsification. 2. that after conviction or after serving his sentence, he again committed" and, within 1? years from his last release of first conviction, he was again convicted of any of the said crimes for the second time. 3. that after his conviction of, or after serving sentence for the second offense, he again committed" and, within 1? years from his last release or last conviction, he was again convicted of any of said offenses, the third time or oftener. Ha"!3a#!< 8!)!$:3!)'e8 4r%7 re6!8!9!)7 HABITUAL &ELI=UENCY RECI&IVISM A) % 'e CRIMES 6%77!e8 #he crimes are specified %t is sufficient that the accused on the date of his trial, shall have been previously convicted by final judgment of another crime embraced in the same title. A) % 'e PERIO& %4 !7e 'e 6r!7e) are 6%77!e8 #he offender is found guilty within ten years from his last release or last conviction. o period of time between the former conviction and the last conviction. A) % 'e NUMBER %4 6r!7e) 6%77!e8 #he accused must be found guilty the third time or oftener of the crimes specified. #he second offense is for an offense found in the same title. A) % 'e!r EFFECTS An additional penalty is also imposed %f not offset by a mitigating circumstance, serves to increase the penalty only to the ma.imum ART. >+ RULES FOR THE APPLICATION OF IN&IVISIBLE PENALTIES OUTLINE OF THE RULES: 1. -hen the penalty is single indivisi/le, it shall be applied regardless of any mitigating (e.cept if privilege mitigating" or aggravating circumstances. 2. -hen the penalty is composed of two indivisi/le penalties, the following rules shall be observed3 a) -hen there is onl0 one aggravating circumstance, the greater penalt0 shall /e imposed. b) -hen there is neither mitigating nor aggravating circumstances, the lesser penalty shall be imposed. c) -hen there is a mitigating circumstance and no aggravating circumstance, the lesser penalty shall be imposed. CRIMINAL LAW COMMITTEE CHAIRPERSON: Mark David Martinez EDP: Elaine Masukat ASSISTANTS: Catherine Danao, Alert Rodri!uez, Claro Re!ino Sa"#a!a, $izelle %ou Caahu!, Mar& 'aren (uizon, %eo San )uan, Ma* +i,toria -a"ao, R&an %ita, .a&ani .rillante, )r* 56 2005 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS
d) -hen /oth mitigating and aggravating circumstances are present, the court shall allow them to offset one another. ART. >; RULES FOR THE APPLICATION OF PENALTIES0 WHICH CONTAIN THREE PERIO&S CASES IN WHICH MITIGATING AN& AGGRAVATING CIRCUMSTANCES ARE NOT CONSI&ERE& IN THE IMPOSITION OF PENALTY: 1. -hen the penalty is single and indivisible (e.cept if privileged mitigating" (. %n felonies through negligence 2. -hen the penalty is only a fine imposed by an ordinance 4. -hen the penalties are prescribed by special laws ART. >>. IMPOSITION OF FINES OUTLINE OF THE PROVISION: 1. #he court can fi. any amount of the fine within the limits established by law. (. #he court must consider3 (1" the mitigating and aggravating circumstances9 and ((" more particularly, the wealth or means of the culprit. 3. #he court ma0 also consider3 (1" the gravity of the crime committed9 ((" the heinousness of it s perpetration9 and (2" the magnitude of its effects on the offender's victims. ART. >B. PENALTY TO BE IMPOSE& UPON A PERSON UN&ER EIGHTEEN YEARS OF AGE APPLICATION OF ART. >B: #his article is not immediately applicable to a minor under 1D years of age, because such minor, if found guilty of the offense charged, is not sentenced to any penalty. #he sentence is suspended and he is ordered committed to the reformatory institution, %+, his application therefore is approved by the court. #his article is applicable when the minor's application for suspension of sentence is >72APP$O8E> or if while in the reformatory institution he becomes %!*))%,%0$7, in which case he shall be returned to the court for the imposition of the proper penalty. ART. A-. SUCCESSIVE SERVICE OF SENTENCE THE THREE-FOL& RULE 1. #<7 8A;%858 =5)A#%* *+ #<7 !*:%!#'& &7#7!7 shall not be more than three times the length of time corresponding to the most severe of the penalties imposed upon him. 2. 0ut in no case to e.ceed ,* 0ears. 3. #his rule shall apply only when the convict is to serve , or more sentences successivel0. 4. &ubsidiary penalty forms part of the penalty. &IFFERENT SYSTEMS OF PENALTY0 RELATIVE TO THE EXECUTION OF TWO OR MORE PENALTIES IMPOSE& ON ONE AN& THE SAME ACCUSE& 1. ;aterial accumulation s0stem o limitation whatever, and accordingly, all the penalties for all the violations were imposed even if they reached beyond the natural span of human life. (. <uridical accumulation s0stem $imited to not more than three- fold the length of time corresponding to the most severe and in no case to e.ceed 4? years. #his is followed in our jurisdiction. 2. A/sorption s0stem #he lesser penalties are absorbed by the graver penalties. 2005 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS EEC!TI"E COMMITTEE AND S!B#ECT C$AIRPERSONS Ma%&'el A(a%en)o* /Over0all Chair#erson1, Ronald #al+an,a% /Over0all +i,e Chair1, Yolanda Tolen)&no/+C0A,ads1, )enn&fe% Ang/+C0 Se,retariat1, #o- Ind.')&/o /+C02inan,e1, Ela&ne Ma*.0a) /+C0 EDP1, Anna Ma%ga%&)a E%e* /+C0%o!isti,s1 #ona)1an Mang.nda-ao /Politi,al %a31, 2%an'&* Bened&') Reo).)a% /%aor %a31, Ro+.ald Pad&lla /Civil %a31, C1a%+a&ne To%%e* /Ta4ation %a31, Ma%0 Da/&d Ma%)&ne, /Cri"inal %a31, 3a%n- L.&*a Aleg%e /Co""er,ial %a31, #&n0- Ann !- /Re"edial %a31, #a'0&e Lo. Ba.)&*)a /%e!al Ethi,s1 San Beda College of Law 57 MEMORY AID IN CRIMINAL LAW ART. A2. PREFERENCE IN THE PAYMENT OF CIVIL LIABILITIES !ivil liability is satisfied by following the chronological order of the dates of the final judgment. Se6!%$ T'ree Provisions common in the last two preceding sections *Ar). A+-AA. ART. AA. WHEN THE PENALTY IS A COMPLEX ONE COMPOSE& OF THREE &ISTINCT PENALTIES COMPLEX PENALTY : is a penalty prescribed by law composed of three distinct penalties, each forming a period3 the lightest of them shall be the minimum, the ne.t the medium, and the most severe the ma.imum period. IN&ETERMINATE SENTENCE LAW *ISL. A6 N%. ;,-+ a) a7e$8e8 "< A6 N%. ;22G CONCEPT OF IN&ETERMINATE SENTENCE is a sentence with a minimum term and a maximum term which, the court is mandated to impose for the /enefit of a guilt0 person who is not dis?ualified therefore, when the ma.imum imprisonment exceeds one (&- 0ear. %t applies to /oth violations of )evised Penal !ode and special laws. A. SENTENCE IN THE ISL %n imposing a prison sentence for an offense punished by the )evised Penal !ode or special penal laws, the court shall sentence the accused to an indeterminate sentence, which has a maximum and a minimum term based on the penalty actually imposed. %&$ application is mandatory, where imprisonment would e.ceed one year. I. IF THE PENALTY IS IMPOSE& BY THE RPC: 1. The ;aximum Term B is that which could be properl0 imposed under the )P!, considering the aggravating and mitigating circumstances. 2. The ;inimumTerm B is within the range of the penalty one degree lower than that prescribed by the )P!, without considering the circumstances. 05# when there is a privileged mitigating circumstance, so that the penalty has to be lowered /0 one degree" the &#A)#%, P*%# for determining the minimum term of the indeterminate penalty is the penalty ne.t lower than that prescribed by the !ode for the offense. II. IF THE PENALTY IS IMPOSE& BY SPECIAL PENAL LAW a) The ;aximum Term B must not e.ceed the ma.imum term fi.ed by said law. b) The ;inimum Term B must not be less than the minimum term prescribed by the same. +or &P7!%A$ $A-&, it is anything within the inclusive range of the prescribed penalty. !ourts are given discretion in the imposition of the indeterminate penalty. #he aggravating and mitigating circumstances are not considered unless the special law adopts the same terminology for penalties as those used in the )P! (such as reclusi.n perpetua and the li1e". B. WHEN BENEFIT OF THE ISL IS NOT APPLICABLE: #he %ndeterminate &entence $aw shall not apply to the following persons3 1. sentenced to death penalt0 or life imprisonment 2. treason" or conspirac0 or proposal to commit treason 3. misprision of treason, rebellion, sedition or espionage 4. pirac0 /. ha/itual delin?uents CRIMINAL LAW COMMITTEE CHAIRPERSON: Mark David Martinez EDP: Elaine Masukat ASSISTANTS: Catherine Danao, Alert Rodri!uez, Claro Re!ino Sa"#a!a, $izelle %ou Caahu!, Mar& 'aren (uizon, %eo San )uan, Ma* +i,toria -a"ao, R&an %ita, .a&ani .rillante, )r* 58 2005 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS
>. escaped from confinement, or evaded sentence 7. granted with conditional pardon by the President, but violated the terms thereof 8. ma.imum term of imprisonment does not exceed & 0ear 9. sentenced to the penalty of destierro or suspension only C. RELEASE OF THE PRISONER ON PAROLE #he 0oard of Pardons and Parole ma0 authori5e the release of a prisoner on parole, after he shall have served the minimum penalty imposed on him, provided that3 a) &uch prisoner is fitted by his training for release, b) #here is reasonable probability that he will live and remain at liberty without violating the law, c) &uch release will not be incompatible with the welfare of society. &. ENTITLEMENT TO FINAL RELEASE AN& &ISCHARGE %f during the period of surveillance such paroled prisoner shall3 (a" show himself to be a law abiding citiBen and, (b" shall not violate any law, the 0oard may issue a final certification in his favor, for his final release and discharge. E. SANCTION FOR VIOLATION OF CON&ITIONS OF THE PAROLE -hen the paroled prisoner shall violate an0 of the conditions of his parole3 (a" the 0oard ma0 issue an order for his arrest" and thereafter, (b" the prisoner shall serve the remaining une.pired portion of the ma.imum sentence for which he was originally committed to prison. F. REASONS FOR FIXING THE MAXIMUM AN& MINIMUM TERMS IN THE IN&ETERMINATE SENTENCE #he minimum and ma.imum terms in the %& must be fi.ed, because they are the basis for the following3 1. -henever a prisoner has3 (a" served the 8%%858 penalty imposed on him, and (b" is fit for release of the prisoner on parole, upon terms and conditions prescribed by the 0oard. (. 0ut when the paroled prisoner violates any of the conditions of his parole during the period of surveillance, he may be rearrested to serve the remaining une.pired portion of the 8A;%858 sentence. 2. 7ven if a prisoner has already served the 8%%858, but he is not fitted for release on the parole, he shall continue to serve until the end of the 8A;%858 term. THE CHIL& AN& YOUTH WELFARE CO&E *P& >-+0 a) a7e$8e8. W'% !) a Y%3'43# O44e$8er@ A youthful offender is a child, minor, or youth, including one who is emancipated in accordance with law, who is over nine years but under eighteen years of age at the time of the commission of the offense. A child nine years of age or under at the time of the commission of the offense shall be e.empt from criminal liability and shall be committed to the care of his or her father or mother, or nearest relative or family friend in the discretion of the court and subject to its supervision #he same shall be done for a child over nine years and under fifteen years of age at the time of the commission of the offense, unless he acted with discernment, in which case he shall be proceeded against in accordance with Article 1F(. 1. #he purpose of the !hild and Mouth -elfare !ode is to avoid a situation where L5:7%$7 *++7=7)& would commingle with ordinary criminals in prison. (. %f the court finds that the youthful offender committed the crime charged against him, it shall =7#7)8%7 the imposable penalty and the civil liability chargeable against him. 2005 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS EEC!TI"E COMMITTEE AND S!B#ECT C$AIRPERSONS Ma%&'el A(a%en)o* /Over0all Chair#erson1, Ronald #al+an,a% /Over0all +i,e Chair1, Yolanda Tolen)&no/+C0A,ads1, )enn&fe% Ang/+C0 Se,retariat1, #o- Ind.')&/o /+C02inan,e1, Ela&ne Ma*.0a) /+C0 EDP1, Anna Ma%ga%&)a E%e* /+C0%o!isti,s1 #ona)1an Mang.nda-ao /Politi,al %a31, 2%an'&* Bened&') Reo).)a% /%aor %a31, Ro+.ald Pad&lla /Civil %a31, C1a%+a&ne To%%e* /Ta4ation %a31, Ma%0 Da/&d Ma%)&ne, /Cri"inal %a31, 3a%n- L.&*a Aleg%e /Co""er,ial %a31, #&n0- Ann !- /Re"edial %a31, #a'0&e Lo. Ba.)&*)a /%e!al Ethi,s1 San Beda College of Law 59 MEMORY AID IN CRIMINAL LAW 3. #he court may not pronounce judgment of conviction but instead &5&P7= all further proceedings if, upon application of the youthful offender, it finds that the best interest of the pu/lic and that of the offender will be served thereby. 4. #he benefits of Article 1F( of P= >?2, as amended, providing for suspension of sentence, shall *# APP$M #* (1" a youthful offender who once en=o0ed suspension of sentence under its provisions, or ((" one who is convicted of an offense punishable by death or life imprisonment. 5. #he youthful offender shall be )7#5)7= to the committing court for pronouncement of judgment, when the youthful offender, (1" has been found incorrigi/le" or ((" has willfull0 failed to comply with the conditions of his rehabilitation programs9 or (2" when his continued stay in the training institution would be inadvisa/le. >. -hen the youthful offender has reached the age of #-7#M-*7 while in commitment, the court shall determine whether- a) #o =%&8%&& the case, if the youthful offender has /ehaved properl0 and has shown his capability to be a useful member of the community9 or b) #o P)**5!7 the judgment of conviction, if the conditions mentioned are not met. 7. %n the latter case, the convicted offender may apply for P)*0A#%*. %n any case, the youthful offender shall be credited in the service of his sentence with the full time spent in actual commitment and detention. D. #he final release of a youthful offender, based on good conduct as provided in Art. 1F> shall not obliterate his !%:%$ $%A0%$%#M for damages. F. A minor who is A$)7=M A A=5$# at the time of his conviction is not entitled to a suspension of sentence. PROBATION LAW OF ,CA> *P& C>B0 AS AMEN&E&. A. CONCEPT P)*0A#%* is a disposition under which a defendant after conviction and sentence is released subject to conditions imposed by the court and to the supervision of a probation officer. B. APPLICATION #his shall apply to all offenders e.cept those entitled to benefits under P= >?2 and similar laws. C. RULES ON GRANT OF PROBATION 1. After having convicted and sentenced a defendant, the trial court 8AM &5&P7= the e.ecution of the sentence, and place the defendant on probation, upon APP$%!A#%* by the defendant within the period for perfecting an appeal. 2. Probation may be granted whether the sentence imposed a term of imprisonment or fine only. 2. * application for probation shall be entertained or granted if the defendant has P7)+7!#7= A APP7A$ from the judgment of conviction. 4. +iling of application for probation operates as a -A%:7) *+ #<7 )%,<# #* APP7A$. /. #he application shall be filed with the trial court, and the order granting or denying probation shall *# 07 APP7A$A0$7. 6. Accessor0 penalties are deemed suspended once probation is granted. &. POST-SENTENCE INVESTIGATION #he convict is not immediately placed on probation. #here shall be a prior investigation by the probation officer and a determination by the court. E. CRITERIA FOR PLACING AN OFFEN&ER ON PROBATION CRIMINAL LAW COMMITTEE CHAIRPERSON: Mark David Martinez EDP: Elaine Masukat ASSISTANTS: Catherine Danao, Alert Rodri!uez, Claro Re!ino Sa"#a!a, $izelle %ou Caahu!, Mar& 'aren (uizon, %eo San )uan, Ma* +i,toria -a"ao, R&an %ita, .a&ani .rillante, )r* 50 2005 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS
#he court shall consider3 1. All information relative to the character, antecedents, environment, mental, and physical condition of the offender. (. Available institutional and community resources. F. PROBATION SHALL BE &ENIE& IF THE COURT FIN&S THAT: 1. #he offender is in need of correctional treatment that can be provided effectively by his commitment to an institution. (. #here is undue ris1 of committing another crime. 3. Probation will depreciate the seriousness of the offense committed. G. &IS=UALIFIE& OFFEN&ERS #<7 077+%#& *+ #<7 =7!)77 &<A$$ *# 07 7;#7=7= #* #<*&73 1. &entenced to serve a ma.imum term of imprisonment of more the ) 0ears. 2. !onvicted of su/version or any crime against the national securit0 or the pu/lic order. 3. Previously convicted by final judgment of an offense punished by imprisonment of not less than 1 month and 1 day andHor a fine not less than P(??. 4. *nce placed on pro/ation. H. CON&ITIONS OF PROBATION ( O%=& *+ !*=%#%*& %8P*&7=3 1. 8andatory or general 6 once violated, the probation is cancelled. #hey are3 a) Probationer3 Presents himself to the probation officer designated to underta1e his supervision, at such place as may be specified in the order, within E( hours from receipt of order9 b) <e reports to the probation officer at least once a month. 2. =iscretionary or special 6 additional conditions listed, which the courts may additionally impose on the probationer towards his correction and rehabilitation outside prison. <*-7:7), the enumeration is not inclusive. Probation statutes are li/eral in character and enable the courts to designate practically AM term it chooses, as long as the probationer's 4onstitutional rights are not jeopardiBed. Also, they must not be unduly restrictive of probationer, and not incompatible with the freedom of conscience of probationer. I. PERIO& OF PROBATION +*) <*- $*, 8AM A !*:%!# 07 P$A!7= * P)*0A#%*P 1. %f the convict is sentenced to a term of imprisonment of *# more than one 0ear" the period of probation shall not e.ceed ( years. 2. %n all other cases, if he is sentenced to more than one 0ear" said period shall not exceed ) 0ears. 3. -hen the sentence imposes a fine only and the offender is made to serve su/sidiar0 imprisonment. #he period of probation shall be twice the total number of days of subsidiary imprisonment. D. ARREST OF PROBATIONER AN& SUBSE=UENT &ISPOSITIONS 1. At any time during probation, the court may issue a warrant for the A))7&# of a probationer for any serious violation of the conditions of probation. (. %f violation is established, the court may (a" )7:*O7 his probation, or (b" continue his probation and 8*=%+M the conditions thereof. #his order is not appealable. 2. %f revo1ed, the probationer shall &7):7 the sentence originally imposed. K. TERMINATION OF PROBATION #he court may order the final discharge of the probationer upon finding that, he has fulfilled the terms and conditions of his probation. 2005 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS EEC!TI"E COMMITTEE AND S!B#ECT C$AIRPERSONS Ma%&'el A(a%en)o* /Over0all Chair#erson1, Ronald #al+an,a% /Over0all +i,e Chair1, Yolanda Tolen)&no/+C0A,ads1, )enn&fe% Ang/+C0 Se,retariat1, #o- Ind.')&/o /+C02inan,e1, Ela&ne Ma*.0a) /+C0 EDP1, Anna Ma%ga%&)a E%e* /+C0%o!isti,s1 #ona)1an Mang.nda-ao /Politi,al %a31, 2%an'&* Bened&') Reo).)a% /%aor %a31, Ro+.ald Pad&lla /Civil %a31, C1a%+a&ne To%%e* /Ta4ation %a31, Ma%0 Da/&d Ma%)&ne, /Cri"inal %a31, 3a%n- L.&*a Aleg%e /Co""er,ial %a31, #&n0- Ann !- /Re"edial %a31, #a'0&e Lo. Ba.)&*)a /%e!al Ethi,s1 San Beda College of Law 51 MEMORY AID IN CRIMINAL LAW L. EFFECTS OF TERMINATION OF PROBATION 1. !ase is deemed terminated. 2. $estoration of all civil rights lost or suspended. 3. Cull0 discharges liability for any fine imposed. ote that the probation is *# coterminous with its period. #here must be an order issued by the court discharging the probationer. C'a(er F!9e: EFe63!%$ a$8 Ser9!6e %4 Pe$a#!e) *Ar). AB-BB. ART. B+. SUSPENSION OF THE EXECUTION OF THE &EATH SENTENCE &ea' )e$e$6e )'a## "e )3)(e$8e8 E'e$ a663)e8 !) a: 1. -oman, while pregnant, (. -oman, within one year after delivery, 2. Person over E? years of age9 4. !onvict who becomes insane" after final sentence of death has been pronounced. ART. BA. &ESTIERRO ONLY IN THE FOLLOWING CASES IS &ESTIERRO IMPOSE&: 1. =eath or serious physical injuries is caused or are inflicted under exceptional circumstances (Art. +,(-D 2. +ailure to give /ond for good behavior in grave and light threats (Art. (D4"9 3. Penalty for the concu/ine in concubinage (Art. 224"9 4. -hen, after reducing the penalty by one or more degrees, destierro is the proper penalt0. TITLE FOUR: EXTINCTION OF CRIMINAL LIABILITY C'a(er O$e: T%a# EF!$6!%$ %4 Cr!7!$a# L!a"!#!< *Ar). BC-C+. ART. BC. CRIMINAL LIABILITY IS TOTALLY EXTINGUISHE& HOW CRIMINAL LIABLITY TOTALLY EXTINGUISHE&: 1. 0y the =7A#< of the convict as to personal penalties9 05# as to pecuniary penalties, liability is e.tinguished only when the death of the offender occurs before or after final judgment (. 0y &7):%!7 *+ &7#7!79 2. 0y A87&#M, which completely e.tinguishes the penalty and all its effects. 4. 0y A0&*$5#7 PA)=* /. 0y P)7&!)%P#%* *+ #<7 !)%87 >. 0y P)7&!)%P#%* *+ P7A$#M E. 0y 8A))%A,7 *+ #<7 *++7=7= -*8A with the offender in the crimes of rape, seduction, abduction, and acts of lasciviousness. %n the crimes of rape, seduction, abduction, and acts of lasciviousness, the marriage, as provided under Art 244, must be contracted in good faith. AMNESTY 6 is an act of the sovereign power granting o/livion or general pardon for a past offense, and is rarely if ever e.ercised in favor of a single individual, and is usually e.tended in behalf of certain classes of persons who are subject to trial but have not yet been convicted. PAR&ON 6 is an act of grace, proceeding from the power entrusted with the e.ecution of the laws, which e.empts the individual on whom it is bestowed from the punishment the law inflicts for the crime he has committed. Par8%$ 8!)!$:3!)'e8 4r%7 a7$e)< PAR&ON AMNESTY 1. %ncludes any crime and is e.ercised 1. A blan1et pardon to classes of persons or communities who CRIMINAL LAW COMMITTEE CHAIRPERSON: Mark David Martinez EDP: Elaine Masukat ASSISTANTS: Catherine Danao, Alert Rodri!uez, Claro Re!ino Sa"#a!a, $izelle %ou Caahu!, Mar& 'aren (uizon, %eo San )uan, Ma* +i,toria -a"ao, R&an %ita, .a&ani .rillante, )r* 52 2005 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS
individually by the President may be guilty of political offenses. (. 7.ercised when the person is already convicted (. 8ay be e.ercised even before trial or investigation is had 2. 8erely loo1s +*)-A)= and relieves the offender from the conse4uences of an offense of which he has been convicted9 it does not wor1 for the restoration of the rights to hold public office, or the right of suffrage, unless such rights are e.pressly restored by means of pardon. 2. $oo1s 0A!O-A)= and abolishes and puts into oblivion the offense itself9 it so overloo1s and obliterates the offense with which he is charged that the person released by amnesty stands before the law precisely as though he had committed no offense. 4. =oes not alter the fact that the accused is a recidivist as it produces only the e.tinction of the personal effects of the penalty. 4. 8a1es an e.- convict no longer a recidivist, because it obliterates the last vestige of the crime. /. =oes not e.tinguish the civil liability of the offender /. =oes not e.tinguish the civil liability of the offender >. 0eing P)%:A#7 A!# by the President, must be pleaded and proved by the person pardoned >. 0eing a Proclamation of the !hief 7.ecutive with the concurrence of !ongress9 is a P50$%! A!# of which the courts should ta1e judicial notice Pre)6r!(!%$ %4 'e 6r!7e B is the forfeiture or loss of the right of the &tate to prosecute the offender, after the lapse of a certain time. PRESCRIPTIVE PERIO&S OF CRIMES: 1. !rimes punishable by a) =eath, reclusi.n perpetua or reclusi.n temporal 6 (? years b" afflictive penalties 6 1/ years c) correctional penalties 6 1? years e.cept those punishable by arresto ma0or which shall prescribe in / years. -hen the penalty fi.ed by law is a compound one, the highest penalty shall be made the basis of the application of the rules contained above. (. !rime of libel 6 1 year 2. *ffenses of oral defamation and slander by deed 6 > months 4. $ight offenses 6 ( months Pre)6r!(!%$ %4 'e (e$a#< 6 is the loss or forfeiture of the right of the government to execute the final sentence" after the lapse of a certain time. PRESCRIPTIVE PERIO&S OF PENALTIES: 1. =eath and reclusi.n perpetua 6 (? years (. *ther afflictive penalties 6 1/ years 2. !orrectional penalties 6 1? years e.cept for the penalty of arresto mayor which prescribes in / years. 4. $ight penalties 6 1 year ART. C+. COMPUTATION OF THE PRESCRIPTION OF PENALTIES OUTLINE 1. Period of prescription commences to run from the date when the culprit evaded the service of his sentence. (. %t is interrupted when the convict a" gives himself up, b" is captured, c" goes to a foreign country with which we have no e.tradition treaty, or d) commits any crime /efore the e.piration of the period of prescription. ELEMENTS 1. #hat the penalty is imposed by final judgment 2. #hat the convict evaded the service of his sentence by escaping during the term of his sentence 2005 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS EEC!TI"E COMMITTEE AND S!B#ECT C$AIRPERSONS Ma%&'el A(a%en)o* /Over0all Chair#erson1, Ronald #al+an,a% /Over0all +i,e Chair1, Yolanda Tolen)&no/+C0A,ads1, )enn&fe% Ang/+C0 Se,retariat1, #o- Ind.')&/o /+C02inan,e1, Ela&ne Ma*.0a) /+C0 EDP1, Anna Ma%ga%&)a E%e* /+C0%o!isti,s1 #ona)1an Mang.nda-ao /Politi,al %a31, 2%an'&* Bened&') Reo).)a% /%aor %a31, Ro+.ald Pad&lla /Civil %a31, C1a%+a&ne To%%e* /Ta4ation %a31, Ma%0 Da/&d Ma%)&ne, /Cri"inal %a31, 3a%n- L.&*a Aleg%e /Co""er,ial %a31, #&n0- Ann !- /Re"edial %a31, #a'0&e Lo. Ba.)&*)a /%e!al Ethi,s1 San Beda College of Law 54 MEMORY AID IN CRIMINAL LAW 3. #he convict who escape from prison has not given himself up, or been captured, or gone to a foreign country 4. #hat the penalty has prescribed because of the lapse of time from the date of the evasion of service of the sentence by the convict. C'a(er TE%: Par!a# EF!$6!%$ %4 Cr!7!$a# L!a"!#!< *Ar). C;-CC. ART. C;. PARTIAL EXTINCTION OF CRIMINAL LIABILITY CRIMINAL LIABILITY IS PARTIALLY EXTINGUISHE&: 1. 0y !*=%#%*A$ PA)=*9 (. 0y !*885#A#%* *+ &7):%!7 2. +or ,**= !*=5!# A$$*-A!7& which the culprit may earn while he is serving sentence9 4. 0y PA)*$7 a. Parole 6 is the suspension of the sentence of a convict, after serving the minimum term of the indeterminate penalty, without being granted a pardon, prescribing the terms upon which the sentence shall be suspended b. %f the convict fails to observe the condition of the parole, the 0oard of Pardons and Parole is authoriBed to 3 (1" direct his A))7&# A= )7#5) #* !5&#*=M and thereafter9 ((" to !A))M *5# <%& &7#7!7 -%#<*5# )7=5!#%* of the time that has elapsed between the date of the parole and the subse4uent arrest. 5. 0y P)*0A#%*. &ee Pro/ation Law page,+ C%$8!!%$a# (ar8%$ 8!)!$:3!)'e8 4r%7 (ar%#e CON&ITIONAL PAR&ON PAROLE 1. 8ay be given at any time after final judgment9 is granted by the !hief 7.ecutive under the provisions of the Administrative 1. 8ay be given after the prisoner has served the minimum penalty9 is granted by the 0oard of Pardons and Parole under the !ode provision of the %ndeterminate &entence $aw (. +or violation of the conditional pardon, the convict may be ordered re-arrested or re-incarcerated by the !hief 7.ecutive, or may be P)*&7!5#7= under Art. 1/F of the !ode (. +or violation of the terms of the parole, the convict !A*# 07 P)*&7!5#7= 5=7) A)#. 1/F *+ #<7 )P!, he can be re-arrested and re- incarcerated to serve the unserved portion of his original penalty. TITLE FIVE: CIVIL LIABILITY C'a(er O$e: Per)%$) C!9!##< L!a"#e 4%r Fe#%$!e) *Ar). ,---,-+. ART. ,--. CIVIL LIABILITY OF A PERSON GUILTY OF FELONY A CRIME HAS A &UAL CHARACTER: 1. As an offense against the state, because of the disturbance of the social order9 and 2. As an offense against the private person injured by the crime, 5$7&& it involves the crime of treason, rebellion, espionage, contempt, and others wherein no civil liability arises on the part of the offender, either because there are no damages to be compensated or there is no private person injured by the crime. EFFECT OF AC=UITTAL Extinction of the penal action does *# carry with it e.tinction of the civil9 5$7&& the e.tinction proceeds from a declaration in a final judgment that the fact from which the civil liability might arise did not e.ist. (&ee &ection 1, )ule 111 of the (??? )ules on !riminal Procedure. !ivil liability arising from other sources of obligations is not impliedly instituted with the criminal action". EFFECT OF &ISMISSAL OF CASE The dismissal of the information or the criminal action does *# affect the right of the offended party to institute or continue the civil action already instituted arising from the offense, because such dismissal or e.tinction of the penal action does not carry with it the e.tinction of the civil action. CRIMINAL LAW COMMITTEE CHAIRPERSON: Mark David Martinez EDP: Elaine Masukat ASSISTANTS: Catherine Danao, Alert Rodri!uez, Claro Re!ino Sa"#a!a, $izelle %ou Caahu!, Mar& 'aren (uizon, %eo San )uan, Ma* +i,toria -a"ao, R&an %ita, .a&ani .rillante, )r* 55 2005 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS
EFFECT OF &EATH OF THE OFFEN&ER %f the offender dies prior to the institution of the action or prior to the finality of judgment, civil liability e.- delicto is e.tinguished. (>E #!E;A% vs. PEOPLE OC TAE PA7L7PP7%E2" #.$. %o. &9,9(3. Octo/er 6" +**'-
%n all these cases, civil liability from sources other than delict are not e.tinguished. ART. ,-,. RULES REGAR&ING CIVIL LIABILITY IN CERTAIN CASES - !ivil liability is still imposed in cases falling under e.empting circumstances 7;!7P#3 1. o civil liability in paragraph 4 of Art. 1( which provides for injury caused by mere accident. (. o civil liability in paragraph E of Art. 1( which provides for failure to perform an act re4uired by law when prevented by some lawful or insuperable cause. - o civil liability is imposed in cases falling under justifying circumstances 7;!7P#3 under paragraph 4, where a person does an act, causing damage to another, in order to avoid evil or injury, the person benefited by the prevention of the evil or injury shall be civilly liable in proportion to the benefit he received. ART. ,-2. SUBSI&IARY LIABILITY OF INNKEEPERS0 TAVERNKEEPERS0 AN& PROPRIETORS OF ESTABLISHMENTS ELEMENTS UN&ER PARAGRAPH , 1. #hat the inn1eeper, tavern1eeper or proprietor of establishment or his employee committed a violation of municipal ordinance or some general or special police regulation. (. #hat the crime is committed in such inn, tavern or establishment. 3. #hat the person criminally liable is insolvent. !oncurrence of all elements ma1es the inn1eeper, tavern1eeper, or proprietor civilly liable for the crime committed in his establishment. ELEMENTS UN&ER PARAGRAPH 2 1. #hat the guests notified in advance the inn1eeper or the person representing of the deposit of their goods within the inn or house. 2. #he guests followed the directions of the inn1eeper or his representative with respect to the care of and vigilance over such goods. 3. &uch goods of the guests lodging therein were ta1en by ro//er0 with force upon things or theft committed within the inn or house. ART. ,-+. SUBSI&IARY CIVIL LIABILITY OF OTHER PERSONS ELEMENTS 1. #he employer, teacher, person, or corporation is engaged in any 1ind of industr0. 2. Any of their servants, pupils, wor1men, apprentices, or employees commits a felony while in the discharge of his duties. 3. #he said employee is insolvent and has not satisfied his civil liability. C'a(er TE%: W'a C!9!# L!a"!#!< I$6#38e) *Ar). ,-;-,,,. ART. ,-;. WHAT IS INCLU&E& IN CIVIL LIABILITY RESTITUTION 6 restitution of the thing itself must be made whenever possible even when found in the possession of a third person e.cept when ac4uired by such person in any manner and under the re4uirements which, by law, bar an action for its recovery. REPARATION OF &AMAGES 6 reparation will be ordered by the court if 2005 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS EEC!TI"E COMMITTEE AND S!B#ECT C$AIRPERSONS Ma%&'el A(a%en)o* /Over0all Chair#erson1, Ronald #al+an,a% /Over0all +i,e Chair1, Yolanda Tolen)&no/+C0A,ads1, )enn&fe% Ang/+C0 Se,retariat1, #o- Ind.')&/o /+C02inan,e1, Ela&ne Ma*.0a) /+C0 EDP1, Anna Ma%ga%&)a E%e* /+C0%o!isti,s1 #ona)1an Mang.nda-ao /Politi,al %a31, 2%an'&* Bened&') Reo).)a% /%aor %a31, Ro+.ald Pad&lla /Civil %a31, C1a%+a&ne To%%e* /Ta4ation %a31, Ma%0 Da/&d Ma%)&ne, /Cri"inal %a31, 3a%n- L.&*a Aleg%e /Co""er,ial %a31, #&n0- Ann !- /Re"edial %a31, #a'0&e Lo. Ba.)&*)a /%e!al Ethi,s1 San Beda College of Law 55 MEMORY AID IN CRIMINAL LAW restitution is not possible. #he court shall determine the amount of damage, ta1ing into consideration the price of the thing, whenever possible, and its special sentimental value. IN&EMNIFICATION FOR &AMAGES 6 includes not only those caused the injured party, but also, those suffered by his family or by a third person by reason of the crime. - EN& OF BOOK ONE - CRIMINAL LAW COMMITTEE CHAIRPERSON: Mark David Martinez EDP: Elaine Masukat ASSISTANTS: Catherine Danao, Alert Rodri!uez, Claro Re!ino Sa"#a!a, $izelle %ou Caahu!, Mar& 'aren (uizon, %eo San )uan, Ma* +i,toria -a"ao, R&an %ita, .a&ani .rillante, )r*