Notice in Appellate Case No. 2D10-5197
1. Applicant Neil J. Gillespie files this Notice as a caveat in the first person, and states:
2. I received this Court’s Order dated July 22, 2014 that states, (enclosed)
The appellees may respond to the appellant's amended application for order within 10 days of the present order. This procedure is different from what the Supreme Court established in Case No. SC11-858 and Case No. SC11-1622 for Rule 2.430(g), Fla.R.Jud.Admin. In those two cases, the Supreme Court entered Orders (enclosed) in each case February 11, 2014 that state in relevant part,
All parties have twenty days from the date of this order to submit, in writing, any objection to Petitioner's request. Any objection submitted must also be served on all other parties; the parties who are served with objections have fifteen days to respond.
3. If the appellees do not respond to my amended application for order, this Notice will become moot. If the appellees or another party responds to my amended application for order,
then I move for fifteen (15) days to respond.
RESPECFULLY SUBMITTED July 31, 2014.
Notice in Appellate Case No. 2D10-5197
1. Applicant Neil J. Gillespie files this Notice as a caveat in the first person, and states:
2. I received this Court’s Order dated July 22, 2014 that states, (enclosed)
The appellees may respond to the appellant's amended application for order within 10 days of the present order. This procedure is different from what the Supreme Court established in Case No. SC11-858 and Case No. SC11-1622 for Rule 2.430(g), Fla.R.Jud.Admin. In those two cases, the Supreme Court entered Orders (enclosed) in each case February 11, 2014 that state in relevant part,
All parties have twenty days from the date of this order to submit, in writing, any objection to Petitioner's request. Any objection submitted must also be served on all other parties; the parties who are served with objections have fifteen days to respond.
3. If the appellees do not respond to my amended application for order, this Notice will become moot. If the appellees or another party responds to my amended application for order,
then I move for fifteen (15) days to respond.
RESPECFULLY SUBMITTED July 31, 2014.
Notice in Appellate Case No. 2D10-5197
1. Applicant Neil J. Gillespie files this Notice as a caveat in the first person, and states:
2. I received this Court’s Order dated July 22, 2014 that states, (enclosed)
The appellees may respond to the appellant's amended application for order within 10 days of the present order. This procedure is different from what the Supreme Court established in Case No. SC11-858 and Case No. SC11-1622 for Rule 2.430(g), Fla.R.Jud.Admin. In those two cases, the Supreme Court entered Orders (enclosed) in each case February 11, 2014 that state in relevant part,
All parties have twenty days from the date of this order to submit, in writing, any objection to Petitioner's request. Any objection submitted must also be served on all other parties; the parties who are served with objections have fifteen days to respond.
3. If the appellees do not respond to my amended application for order, this Notice will become moot. If the appellees or another party responds to my amended application for order,
then I move for fifteen (15) days to respond.
RESPECFULLY SUBMITTED July 31, 2014.
Tami McCarroll, Chief Deputy Clerk The Second District Court of Appeal 1005 E. Memorial Blvd. RE: Appellate Case No. 2D10-5197 Lakeland, FL 33801 lower tribunal no. 05-CA-7205 Dear Chief Deputy Clerk McCarroll: Please find enclosed my Notice in Appellate Case No. 2D10-5197. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Neil J. Gillespie 8092 SW 115th Loop Ocala, Florida 34481 Telephone: (352) 854-7807 Email: neilgillespie@mfi.net Enclosures cc: Hon. Pat Frank, Clerk of Circuit Court, Hillsborough County, Florida Ryan Christopher Rodems, Morgan & Morgan, P.A. SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA NEIL J. GILLESPIE Plaintiff/Counter Defendant, Appellate Case: 2D10-5197 Lower Tribunal Case: 05-CA-7205 vs. BARKER, RODEMS & COOK, P.A. and WILLIAM J. COOK, Defendants/Counter Plaintiffs. ________________________________________/ NOTICE 1. Applicant Neil J. Gillespie files this Notice as a caveat in the first person, and states: 2. I received this Courts Order dated July 22, 2014 that states, (enclosed) The appellees may respond to the appellant's amended application for order within 10 days of the present order. This procedure is different from what the Supreme Court established in Case No. SC11-858 and Case No. SC11-1622 for Rule 2.430(g), Fla.R.Jud.Admin. In those two cases, the Supreme Court entered Orders (enclosed) in each case February 11, 2014 that state in relevant part, All parties have twenty days from the date of this order to submit, in writing, any objection to Petitioner's request. Any objection submitted must also be served on all other parties; the parties who are served with objections have fifteen days to respond. 3. If the appellees do not respond to my amended application for order, this Notice will become moot. If the appellees or another party responds to my amended application for order, then I move for fifteen (15) days to respond. RESPECFULLY SUBMITTED July 31, 2014. Neil J. Gillespie, applicant pro se 8092 SW 115th Loop Ocala, Florida 34481 Telephone: (352) 854-7807 Served per the attached Service List Certificate of Service I certify that the enclosed NOTICE in Case No. 2D10-5197 was served today July 31, 2014 as indicated below. Tami McCarroll, Chief Deputy Clerk Second District Court of Appeal 1005 E. Memorial Blvd. Lakeland, FL 33801 Email: mccarrot@flcourts.org VIA U.P.S. No. 1Z64589FP292212119 Hon. Pat Frank, Clerk of Circuit Court Hillsborough County, Florida County Center 601 E. Kennedy Blvd. Tampa, FL 33602-4156 VIA U.P.S. No. 1Z64589FP292972129 Ryan Christopher Rodems Morgan & Morgan, P.A. 20 N Orange Ave. Orlando, Florida 32801-2414 VIA U.P.S. No. 1Z64589FP290138534 RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED July 31, 2014. Neil J. Gillespie, Applicant pro se 8092 SW 115th Loop Ocala, Florida 34481 Telephone: (352) 854-7807 IN THE DISTRICTCOURTOF APPEALOF THE STATEOF FLORIDA SECONDDISTRICT, POSTOFFICE BOX327, LAKELAND,FL33802-0327 July22,2014 CASENO.: 2D10-5197 L.T. No. :05-CA-7205 NeilJ. Gillespie v. Barker, Rodems&Cook, P. A. & William J. Cook AppellantI Petitioner(s), Appellee/Respondent(s). BYORDEROF THE COURT: Theappelleesmayrespond tothe appellant'samendedapplicationfororder within 10daysofthe presentorder. IHEREBYCERTIFYthattheforegoing is atrue copyofthe original courtorder. Served: Ryan ChristopherRodems, Esq. Neil J. Gillespie PatFrank, Clerk ec .. C!Court ofjflorfba TUESDAY,FEBRUARY11,2014 CASENO.: SCII-1622 LowerTribunalNo(s).: 2DIO-5197; 05-CA-7205 NEILJ. GILLESPIE vs. BARKER,RODEMS & COOK, ETAL. Petitioner(s) Respondent(s) Petitioner'swithdrawalofmotionsfor surrenderoffiles ishereby acknowledged. Petitionerhas filedanApplicationforOrderonSeptember30,2013, requestingthatthefile forthiscase,inlieuofdestruction,bereleasedto him subsequentto theCourt'sretentiontimelinerequirement, incompliancewithFla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.430(g). Petitioner'srequestis attachedas AppendixA. Allparties havetwentydaysfromthedateofthisorderto submit,inwriting,anyobjectionto Petitioner'srequest. Anyobjectionsubmittedmustalsobeservedonallother parties;thepartieswhoareservedwithobjectionshavefifteendaystorespond. ATrueCopy Test:
Clerk,SupretneCourt ab Served: RYANCHRISTOPHERRODEMS NEILJ. GILLESPIE HON. PATFRANK,CLERK HON. JAMESBIRKHOLD,CLERK ... " SUPREMECOURTOFFLORIDA STATEOFFLORIDA NEILJ. GILLESPIE Plaintiff/CounterDefendant, Case: SCII-1622 LowerTribunal: 05-CA-7205 vs. BARKER,RODEMS & COOK,P.A.and WILLIAMJ. COOK, Defendants/CounterPlaintiffs. ---------------- / APPLICATIONFORORDER ApplicantNeilJ. Gillespie(hereinafter"Applicant"),reluctantlyappearingprosedueto indigenceand/orinsolvency,hereinthefirstperson,appliestothe SupremeCourtofFlorida pursuantto Rule2.430(g),Fla.R.Jud.Admin.,for an OrderrequiringtheClerkto delivertothe ApplicantthecourtrecordsinCase: SC11-1622thataretobedestroyedordisposedof Rule2.430(g),Fla.R.Jud.Admin.: (g)DispositionOtherThanDestruction.Beforedestructionor dispositionofcourtrecordsunderthisrule,anypersonmayapplytothecourtfor anorderrequiringtheclerktodelivertotheapplicantthecourtrecordsthatareto bedestroyedordisposedot:Allpartiesshallbegivennoticeof theapplication. Thecourtshalldisposeof thatcourtrecordasappropriate. NopaTty, personorentityotherthanme filedanythinginthecase. All partiesshownonthecertificateof servicewereprovideda copyof thisapplication. RESPECFULLYSUBMITTEDSeptember27,2013. CertificateofService IcertifythattheApplicationForOrderinCaseNo. SC11-1622intheFloridaSupreme CourtwasprovidedSeptember27,2013 to: HON. THOMAS D. HALL Officeofthe Clerk SupremeCourtofFlorida 500SouthDuvalStreet Tal1ahassee,Florida32399 VIAV.P.S. No. IZ64589FP290801254 Icertifythatacopyhereofhasbeenfurnishedtoeachofthe following: HON. JAMES BIRKHOLD ClerkoftheSecondDistrictCourtofAppeal 1005 E. MemorialBlvd. Lakeland,FL33801 VIAV.P.S. No. lZ64589FP293714825 HON.PATFRANK,Clerkof CircuitCourt CountyCenter 601 E. KennedyBlvd. Tampa,FL33602 VIAV.P.S. No. lZ64589FP291209232 RyanChristopherRodems Barker,Rodems&Cook,P.A. 501 EKennedyBlvd. Suite790 Tampa,Florida33602-5258 VIAV.P.S. No. 1Z64589FP290126047 RESPECTFULLYSUBMITTEDSeptember27,2013. ____ . 0- . I. ctourtofjflortba MONDAY, MARCH 12,2012 2213SEP30 PH 1=29 CASENO.: SC11-1622 LowerTribunalNo(s).: 2DI0o97, OS-CA- NEILJ. GILLESPIE vs. BARKER,RODEMS & COOK,ETAL. Petitioner(s) Respondent(s) Thepetitionerhas filedapetitionforwritofmandamuswiththeCourt. To theextentthepetitionerseeksawritofmandamusdirectedtowardsthedistrict court,thepetitionisdeniedbecauseawritofmandamuscannotbeissuedto direct themannerinwhichacourtshallactin thelawfulexerciseofitsjurisdiction. State ex reI. NorthSt. LucieRiverDrainageDis!. v. Kanner, 11 So. 2d889,890 (Fla. 1943);seealsoMigliorev. CityofLauderhill,415 So. 2d62, 63 (Fla.4thDCA 1982)(statingthatma:ndamus "isnotanappropriatevehicleforreviewofamerely erroneousdecisionnorisitpropertomandatethedoing(orundoing)ofa discretionaryact"),approved,431 So. 2d 986(Fla. 1983). Totheextentthe petitionerseeksanyadditionalrelief,thepetitionisdismissedasfacially insufficient. PARIENTE,LEWIS,QUINCE,LABARGA, andPERRY,JJ.,concur. ATrueCopy Test:
Clerlc lt Sliprellle kb Served: NEILJ. GILLESPIE/ RYANCHRISTOPHERRODEMS HON. PAT FRANK,CLERK HON.JAMES BIRKHOLD,CLERK ~ u r t t ((ourtofjflorfba TUESDAY,FEBRUARY11,2014 CASENO.: SC11-858 LowerTribunalNo(s).: 05-CA-007205 NEILJ. GILLESPIE vs. BARKER,RODEMS &COOK, P.A.,ETAL. Petitioner(s) Respondent(s) Petitioner'swithdrawalofmotionsforsurrenderoffilesishereby acknowledged. PetitionerhasfiledanApplicationforOrderonSeptember30,2013, requestingthatthefile forthiscase,inlieuofdestruction,bereleasedtohim subsequenttotheCourt'sretentiontimelinerequirement, incompliancewithFla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.430(g). Petitioner'srequestisattachedasAppendixA. Allparties havetwentydaysfromthedateofthisordertosubmit,inwriting,anyobjectionto Petitioner'srequest.Anyobjectionsubmittedmustalsobeservedonallother parties;thepartieswhoareservedwithobjectionshavefifteendaystorespond. ATrueCopy Test: ab Served: RYANCHRISTOPHERRODEMS NEILJ. GILLESPIE HON. PATFRANK,CLERK DAVIDA. ROWLAND HON. JAMESD. ARNOLD,JUDGE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA STATE OF FLORIDA NEIL J. GILLESPIE Plaintiff/Counter Defendant, Case: SCI 1-858 Lower Tribunal: 05-CA-7205 vs. BARKER, RODEMS & COOK, P.A. and WILLIAM J. COOK, Defendants/Counter Plaintiffs. ---------------- / APPLICATION FOR ORDER Applicant Neil J. Gillespie (hereinafter "Applicant"), reluctantly appearing pro se due to indigence and/or insolvency, here in the first person, applies to the Supreme Court of Florida pursuant to Rule 2.430(g), Fla.R.Jud.Admin., for an Order requiring the Clerk to deliver to the Applicant the court records in Case: Sell-8S8 that are to be destroyed or disposed of Rule 2.430(g), Fla.R.Jud.Admin.: (g) Disposition Other Than Destruction. Before destruction or disposition of court records under this rule, any person may apply to the court for an order requiring the clerk to deliver to the applicant the court records that are to be destroyed or disposed of: All parties shall be given notice of the application. The court shall dispose of that court record as appropriate. No party, person or entity other than me filed anything in the case. All parties shown on the certificate of service were provided a copy of this application. RESPECFULLY SUBMITTED September 27,2013. Certificate of Service I certify that the Application For Order in Case No. SC 11-858 in the Florida Supreme Court was provided September 27, 2013 to: HON. THOMAS D. HALL Office of the Clerk Supreme Court of Florida 500 South Duval Street Tallahassee, Florida 32399 VIA V.P.S. No. IZ64589FP290801254 I certify that a copy hereof has been furnished to each of the following: HON. PAT FRANK, Clerk of Circuit Court David A. Rowland, General Counsel County Center Thirteenth Judicial Circuit Of Florida 601 E. Kennedy Blvd. 800 E. Twiggs Street, Suite 603 Tampa, FL 33602 Tampa, Florida 33602 VIA V.P.S. No. IZ64589FP291209232 VIA V.P.S. No. lZ64589FP293610866 HON. JAMES D. ARNOLD, JUDGE Ryan Christopher Rodems 800 E. Twiggs St., Room #514 Barker, Rodems & Cook, P.A. Tampa, Florida 33602 SOl E Kennedy Blvd. Suite 790 VIA V.P.S. No. IZ64589FP294570872 Tampa, Florida 33602-5258 VIA V.P.S. No. IZ64589FP290126047 RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED September 27, 2013. QCourt of jflortba WEDNESDAY, MAY 18, 2011 CASE NO.: sell-8S8 Si.J?I\[hi.:: l;.JURT Lower Tribunal No(s).: NEIL J. GILLESPIE vs. BARKER, RODEMS & COOK, P.A., ET AL. Petitioner(s) Respondent(s) The petition for writ of habeas corpus is hereby denied. PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, POLSTON, and PERRY, JJ., concur. A True Copy Test:
lOtnas D. HaJI Clerk, Silprellle COlut ab Served: DAVIn A. ROWLAND NEIL J. GILLESPIE RYAN CHRISTOPHER RODEMS HON. PAT FRANK, CLERK HON. JAMES D. ARNOLD, JUDGE