Mathematical Theory and Modeling www.iiste.

org
ISSN 2224-5804 (Paper) ISSN 2225-0522 (Online)
Vol.4, No.8, 2014

78
Common Random Fixed Point Theorems of Contractions in
Partial Cone Metric Spaces over Non normal Cones

PIYUSH M. PATEL
(1)
Research Scholar of Sainath University,Ranchi(Jarkhand).
pmpatel551986@gmail.com

RAMAKANT BHARDWAJ
(2)
Associate Professor in Truba Institute of Engineering & Information Technology, Bhopal (M.P).
drrkbhardwaj100@gmail.com

SABHAKANT DWIVEDI
(3)
Department of Mathematics, Institute for Excellence in higher education Bhopal

1. ABSTRACT: The purpose of this paper is to prove existence of common random fixed point in the setting of
partial cone metric space over the non-normal cones.
Key wards: common fixed point,cone metric space, random variable
2. INTRODUCTION AND PRELIMINARIES
Random nonlinear analysis is an important mathematical discipline which is mainly concerned with the study of
random nonlinear operators and their properties and is needed for the study of various classes of random
equations. The study of random fixed point theory was initiated by the Prague school of Probabilities in the
1950s [4, 13, and 14]. Common random fixed point theorems are stochastic generalization of classical common
fixed point theorems. The machinery of random fixed point theory provides a convenient way of modeling many
problems arising from economic theory and references mentioned therein. Random methods have revolutionized
the financial markets. The survey article by Bharucha-Reid [1] attracted the attention of several mathematicians
and gave wings to the theory. Itoh [18] extended Spacek's and Hans's theorem to multivalued contraction
mappings. Now this theory has become the full edged research area and various ideas associated with random
fixed point theory are used to obtain the solution of nonlinear random system (see [2,3,7,8,9 ]). Papageorgiou
[11, 12], Beg [5,6] studied common random fixed points and random coincidence points of a pair of compatible
random and proved fixed point theorems for contractive random operators in Polish spaces.
In 2007, Huang and Zhang [9] introduced the concept of cone metric space and establish some fixed point
theorems for contractive mappings in normal cone metric spaces. Subsequently, several other authors [10, 17, ]
studied the existence of fixed points and common fixed points of pings satisfying contractive type condition on a
normal cone metric space. In 2008, Rezapour and Hamlbarani [17] omitted the assumption of normality in cone
metric space, which is a milestone in developing fixed point theory in cone metric space. In this paper we prove
existence of common random fixed point in the setting of cone random metric spaces under weak contractive
condition. Recently, Dhagat et al. [19] introduced the concept of cone random metric space and proved an
existence of random fixed point under weak contraction condition in the setting of cone random metric spaces.
The purpose of this paper to find common random fixed point theorems of contractions in partial cone metric
spaces over non normal cones.
Definition 2.1. Let X be a nonempty set and let be a cone of a topological vector space E . A partial cone
metric on X is a mapping P X X : p O such that, for each X t h t g t f e ) ( ), ( ), ( , O e t ,

Mathematical Theory and Modeling www.iiste.org
ISSN 2224-5804 (Paper) ISSN 2225-0522 (Online)
Vol.4, No.8, 2014

79
O e
+ s
s
=
= = =
t
t h t h p t g t h p t h t f p t g t f p p
t g t f p t f t f p p
t f t g p t g t f p p
t g t f t g t g p t f t f p t g t f p p
)) ( ), ( ( )) ( ), ( ( )) ( ), ( ( )) ( ), ( ( ) 3 (
)) ( ), ( ( )) ( ), ( ( ) 3 (
)) ( ), ( ( )) ( ), ( ( ) 2 (
), ( ) ( )) ( ), ( ( )) ( ), ( ( )) ( ), ( ( ) 1 (

The pair ) , ( p X is called a partial cone metric space over .
Definition 2.2. A function f: C is said to be measurable if
1
( ) f B C

e for every Borel subset B of

H.
Definition 2.3. A function : F C C O is said to be a random operator if (., ) : F x C O is measurable
for every x C e
Definition 2.4. A measurable : g C O is said to be a random fixed point of the random operator
: F C C O if ( , ( )) ( ) F t g t g t = for all t eO
Definition 2.5. A random operator F: C C is said to be continuous if for fixed t eO, ( ,.) : F t C C
is continuous.
Lemma:2.6 Let P be solid cone of a topological vector space E and { }{ }{ } . ) ( , ) ( , ) ( E t h t g t f
n n n
c if
n t g t h t f
n n n
s s ) ( ) ( ) ( , and there exists some E t e ) ( e Such that
) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( t t h then t t g and t t f
n n n
e e e
e e e

Lemma:2.7 Let P be solid cone of a normed vector space ( ) . , E then for each sequence { } . ) ( E t f
n
c
) ( ) ( ) ( ) (
.
t t f implies t t f
n n
e e
e
moreover if P is normal, then ) ( ) ( t t f
n
e
e

implies ) ( ) (
.
t t f
n
e
Lemma:2.8 Let P be solid cone of a normed vector space ( ) { } and K E
n
, c , . , { } . ) ( P t f
n
c
u u
e e
+ < ) ( , sup ) ( t f K then K and t f
n n n n n
.
Theorem 2.9 Let ) , ( p X O be partial cone metric space. The mapping : , S T X X O are called
contractions restricted with variable positive linear bounded mappings if there exist
) 4 , 3 , 2 , 1 ( : = i X X L
i
, such that
)) ), ( ( ), ( ( ) ), ( ( ), ( ( )) ( ), ( (
) ), ( ( ), ( ( )) ( ), ( (
)) ), ( ( ), ( ( )) ( ), ( ( )) ( ), ( ( )) ( ), ( ( )) ), ( ( (
4
3
2 1
t t f T t g p t t g S t f p t g t f L
t t g S t g p t g t f L
t t f T t f p t g t f L t g t f p t g t f L t t f T p
+ +
+
+ s
(*) ) ( ), ( eX t g t f


In particular if (*) is holds with


then T and S are called contractions restricted with positive linear bounded mappings


3. Main Result:
) 4 , 3 , 2 , 1 ( )) ( ), ( ( = e i A and A t g t f L
i i i
,
Mathematical Theory and Modeling www.iiste.org
ISSN 2224-5804 (Paper) ISSN 2225-0522 (Online)
Vol.4, No.8, 2014

80

Theorem 3.1. Let ( , ) X p be a -complete partial cone metric space over a solid cone of a normed vector
space ( , . ) E and let , : T S X X O be contractions restricted with variable positive linear bounded
random mappings. If
3 4
( ( ( ), ( )) ( ( ), ( ))) 1 p L f t g t L f t g t + < and
2 4
( ( ( ), ( )) ( ( ), ( ))) 1 p L f t g t L f t g t + <
( ), ( ) (1) f t g t X e
1 2
1 l l < and
3
l < , where (.) p denotes the spectral radius of linear bounded mappings,
1 1
(t),g(t) X
2 2
(t),g(t) X
3 3
(t),g(t) X
l sup ( ( ), ( ))
l sup ( ( ), ( ))
l sup ( ( ), ( )) , (2)
f
f
f
K f t g t
K f t g t
K f t g t
e
e
e
=
=
=

1 1 1 2 4
2 2 1 3 4
3 2 3 4
( ( ), ( )) ( ( ), ( ))[L ( ( ), ( )) ( ( ), ( )) ( ( ), ( ))]
( ( ), ( )) ( ( ), ( ))[L ( ( ), ( )) ( ( ), ( )) ( ( ), ( ))]
( ( ), ( )) ( ( ), ( ))[I ( ( ), ( )) ( ( ), ( ))]
K f t g t L f t g t f t g t L f t g t L f t g t
K f t g t L f t g t f t g t L f t g t L f t g t
K f t g t L f t g t L f t g t L f t g t
f
= + +
= + +
= + +
( ), ( ) (3) t g t X e

where
1
( ( ), ( )) L f t g t and
2
( ( ), ( )) L f t g t denote the inverse of
3 4
I ( ( ), ( )) ( ( ), ( )) L f t g t L f t g t and
2 4
I ( ( ), ( )) ( ( ), ( )) L f t g t L f t g t respectively, then and T S
have common random fixed point in X Moreover if
1 2 3 4
( ( ( ), ( )) ( ( ), ( )) ( ( ), ( )) 2 ( ( ), ( ))) 1 ( ), ( )
(4)
p L f t g t L f t g t L f t g t L f t g t f t g t X + + + < e

then and T S have unique common random fixed point (t) h X e such that, for each
(t)
n
h X e , (t) (t)
p
n
h h
t
where (t)
n
h is defined by
1
( (t), t) ; n is even number
(t) (5)
S( (t), t) ; n is odd number
n
n
n
T h
h
h
+

=

Proof. For each X y x e , by (1), the inverse of )) ( ), ( ( )) ( ), ( ( 1
4 3
t g t f L t g t f L and
)) ( ), ( ( )) ( ), ( ( 1
4 2
t g t f L t g t f L exist. then, it is clear that
1
L and
2
L are meaningful
and
3 2 1
, , K K K are well defined.
| |

=
+ =
0
4 3 1
)) ( ), ( ( )) ( ), ( ( )) ( ), ( (
i
i
t g t f L t g t f L t g t f L


X y x e , , which is together with ) 4 , 3 , 2 ( : = i X X L
i
, implies that ) 2 , 1 ( : = i X X L
i
,
and hence ). 3 , 2 , 1 ( : = i X X K
i
, by(*),(5) , (p4) , X X L :
4

| | ) 6 ( )) ( ), ( ( )) ( ), ( ( )) ( ), ( (
0
4 2 2
+ =

= i
i
t g t f L t g t f L t g t f L
Mathematical Theory and Modeling www.iiste.org
ISSN 2224-5804 (Paper) ISSN 2225-0522 (Online)
Vol.4, No.8, 2014

81

) 7 (
))] ( ), ( ( )) ( ), ( ( ))[ ( ), ( (
)) ( ), ( ( )) ( ), ( (
)) ( ), ( ( )) ( ), ( (
)) ( ), ( ( )) ( ), ( (
))] ( ), ( ( )) ( ), ( ( ))[ ( ), ( (
)) ( ), ( ( )) ( ), ( (
)) ( ), ( ( )) ( ), ( (
)) ( ), ( ( )) ( ), ( (
) ), ( ( ), ), ( ( ( )) ( ), ( (
2 2 1 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 4
2 2 1 2 1 2 2 3
1 2 2 1 2 2 2
1 2 2 1 2 2 1
1 2 1 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 4
2 2 1 2 1 2 2 3
1 2 2 1 2 2 2
1 2 2 1 2 2 1
1 2 2 2 2 1 2

e + +
+
+
s
+ +
+
+
s
=
+ + + +
+ + +
+ +
+ +
+ + + +
+ + +
+ +
+ +
+ + +
N k t f t f p t f t f p t f t f L
t f t f p t f t f L
t f t f p t f t f L
t f t f p t f t f L
t f t f p t f t f p t f t f L
t f t f p t f t f L
t f t f p t f t f L
t f t f p t f t f L
t t f S t t f T p t f t f p
k k k k k k
k k k k
k k k k
k k k k
k k k k k k
k k k k
k k k k
k k k k
k k k k

And so
| |
) 8 (
))] ( ), ( (
)) ( ), ( (
)) ( ), ( ( )) ( ), ( (
)) ( ), ( ( )) ( ), ( ( )) ( ), ( (
1 2 2
1 2 2 4
1 2 2 2 1 2 2 1
2 2 1 2 1 2 2 4 1 2 2 2

e
(

+
+
s

+
+
+ +
+ + + +
N k t f t f p
t f t f L
t f t f L t f t f L
t f t f p t f t f L t f t f L I
k k
k k
k k k k
k k k k k k




Act the above inequality with )) ( ), ( (
1 2 2 1
t f t f L
k k +
; then,

, X X L :
1
,


) 9 ( )), ( ), ( ( )) ( ), ( ( )) ( ), ( (
1 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 2
e s
+ + + +
N k t f t f p t f t f K t f t f p
k k k k k k



Similarly ,by (*),(p3), (p4) and , X X L :
4



) 10 (
))] ( ), ( ( )) ( ), ( ( ))[ ( ), ( (
)) ( ), ( ( )) ( ), ( (
)) ( ), ( ( )) ( ), ( (
)) ( ), ( ( )) ( ), ( (
))] ( ), ( ( )) ( ), ( ( ))[ ( ), ( (
)) ( ), ( ( )) ( ), ( (
)) ( ), ( ( )) ( ), ( (
)) ( ), ( ( )) ( ), ( (
) ), ( ( ), ), ( ( (
)) ( ), ( ( )) ( ), ( (
3 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 4
2 2 1 2 1 2 2 2 3
3 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2
1 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 1
3 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 4
2 2 1 2 1 2 2 2 3
3 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2
1 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 1
1 2 2 2
2 2 3 2 3 2 2 2

e + +
+
+
s
+ +
+
+
s
=
=
+ + + + + +
+ + + +
+ + + +
+ + + +
+ + + + + +
+ + + +
+ + + +
+ + + +
+ +
+ + + +
N k t f t f p t f t f p t f t f L
t f t f p t f t f L
t f t f p t f t f L
t f t f p t f t f L
t f t f p t f t f p t f t f L
t f t f p t f t f L
t f t f p t f t f L
t f t f p t f t f L
t t f S t t f T p
t f t f p t f t f p
k k k k k k
k k k k
k k k k
k k k k
k k k k k k
k k k k
k k k k
k k k k
k k
k k k k

And so
Mathematical Theory and Modeling www.iiste.org
ISSN 2224-5804 (Paper) ISSN 2225-0522 (Online)
Vol.4, No.8, 2014

82
| |
) 11 (
))] ( ), ( (
)) ( ), ( (
)) ( ), ( ( )) ( ), ( (
)) ( ), ( ( )) ( ), ( ( )) ( ), ( (
1 2 2 2
1 2 2 2 4
1 2 2 2 3 1 2 2 2 1
3 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 4 1 2 2 2 2

e
(

+
+
s

+ +
+ +
+ + + +
+ + + + + +
N k t f t f p
t f t f L
t f t f L t f t f L
t f t f p t f t f L t f t f L I
k k
k k
k k k k
k k k k k k


Act the above inequality with )) ( ), ( (
1 2 2 2 2
t f t f L
k k + +
; then, by: , :
2
, X X L
) 12 ( . , )) ( ), ( ( )) ( ), ( ( ) ( ), ( (
2 2 1 2 1 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2
e s
+ + + + + +
N k t f t f p t f t f K t f t f p
k k k k k k

Moreover , : ,
2 1
, X X K K
) 13 ( )), ( ), ( ( )) ( ), ( ( ........
))........ ( ), ( ( )) ( ), ( ( )) ( ), ( (
1 0 1 0 1
1 2 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 2
e
s
+ + +
N k t f t f p t f t f K
t f t f K t f t f K t f t f p
k k k k k k


In the following, we will prove that
) 14 ( )) ( ), ( ( u
e
t f t f p
m n

For m>n, we have four cases
2q n 2p, m (4) 1 2q n 2p, (3)m 2q n 1, + 2p = m (2) 1; + 2q = n 1, + 2p = m (1) = = + = = =
Where p and q are two non negative integers such that q p > . We only show that (14) holds for
case (1) the proof of three cases is similar. It follows for (p4) and (13) that
) 15 ( .
)) ( ), ( ( )) ( ), ( ( ..... )) ( ), ( ( )) ( ), ( (
)) ( ), ( ( )) ( ), ( ( ))..... ( ), ( ( )) ( ), ( (
..... )) ( ), ( ( )) ( ), ( ( ))..... ( ), ( ( )) ( ), ( ( )) ( ), ( (
)) ( ), ( ( )) ( ), ( ( ))........ ( ), ( ( )) ( ), ( (
)) ( ), ( (
)) ( ), ( ( )) ( ), ( ( ......... )) ( ), ( ( )) ( ), ( (
)) ( ), ( (
)) ( ), ( (
1 0 1 0 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2
1 0 1 0 1 3 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 1
1 0 1 0 1 1 2 2 2 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 2
1 0 1 0 1 1 2 2 2 1 2 2 1
1 0 2 1
1 2 2 2 1 2 3 2 2 2 2 2 1 2
1 2 1 2

> +
+
+ +
=
s
+ + + + s
=
s


+ + +
+
+ + + + +
+ +
q p t f t f p t f t f K t f t f K t f t f K
t f t f p t f t f K t f t f K t f t f K
t f t f p t f t f K t f t f K t f t f K t f t f K
t f t f p t f t f K t f t f K t f t f K
t f t f K pK
t f t f p t f t f p t f t f p t f t f p
t f t f p
t f t f p
p p q p
p p q q
q q q q q q
q q q q
p p p p q q q q
p q
m n
u
By
, 1
2 1
< l l
( ) ( )
( )( )
) 16 ( ,
1
)) ( ), ( (
)) ( ), ( (
)) ( ), ( ( .....
)) ( ), ( (
2 1
1 0 2 1 2 1 1
1 0
1
2 1 1 2 1 1
1 0 2 1 2
1
1
1
2
1
1 2
1
1
1 0 2 1
>

+
s
|
|
.
|

\
|
+ + =
+ + + + s

= + =
+ + + +
q p
l l
t f t f p l l l l l
t f t f p l l l l l l
t f t f p l l l l l l l l
t f t f K pK
q
p
q i
p
q i
i i
p p p p q q q q

Which implies that u
.
)) ( ), ( ( t f t f p
m n
,and hence u
e
)) ( ), ( ( t f t f p
m n
by
lemma(2.7) Thus by (15) and lemma (2.6) u
e
)) ( ), ( ( t f t f p
m n
;that is (14) holds. It is prove that
{ } ) (t f
n
is au Cauchy sequence in ( ) p X, ,and so by the u completeness of ( ) p X, , there exits X t h e ) (
such that ) ( ) ( t h t f
p
n

t
and u = )) ( ), ( ( t h t h p ; that is,

Mathematical Theory and Modeling www.iiste.org
ISSN 2224-5804 (Paper) ISSN 2225-0522 (Online)
Vol.4, No.8, 2014

83
) 17 ( )) ( ), ( ( u
e
t h t f p
n
.
For all , N k e by (*) and (p4),

( ) ( )
( ) ( ) ( )
( )
( ) | |
)) ( ), ( (
) ), ( ( ), ( )) ( ), ( ( )) ( ), ( (
)) ( ), ( ( )) ( ), ( (
) ), ( ( ), ( )) ( ), ( (
)) ( ), ( ( )) ( ), ( (
)) ( ), ( ( ), ( , ), (
)) ( ), ( ( ) ( ), ( ), ), ( ( ) ( ), ), ( (
2
1 2 2 1 2 4
2 1 2 1 2 3
1 2 2
1 2 1 2 1
2 1 2
2 2
t h t f p
t t h T t f p t f t h p t f t h L
t f t f p t f t h L
t t h T t h p t f t h L
t f t h p t f t h L
t h t f p t t f S t t h T p
t h t f p t f t h t t h T p t h t t h T p
k
k k k
k k k
k
k k
k k
k k
+
+ +
+
+
s
+ =
+ s

( )
| |
( )
( )
( ) ) 18 ( )) ( ), ( ( ) ), ( ( ), (
)) ( ), ( ( ) ), ( ( ), (
) ), ( ( ), ( )) ( ), ( (
)) ( ), ( (
)) ( ), ( ( ))) ( ), ( ( )) ( ), ( (
) ), ( ( ), ( )) ( ), ( (
)) ( ), ( ( )) ( ), ( (
2
2
1 2 2
1 2 4
2 1 2 1 2 3
1 2 2
1 2 1 2 1
+ +
(

+ +
+
+
+ +
+
s

t h t f p t t h T t h p
t h t f p t t h T t h p
t t h t f p t f t h p
t f t h L
t f t h p t h t f p t f t h L
t t h T t h p t f t h L
t f t h p t f t h L
k
k
k k
k
k k k
k
k k

And so
| |
| |
| |
) 19 (
)) ( ), ( ( )) ( ), ( ( )) ( ), ( (
)) ( ), ( ( )) ( ), ( ( )) ( ), ( ( )) ( ), ( (
)) ( ), ), ( ( ( )) ( ), ( ( )) ( ), ( (
2 1 2 4 1 2 3
1 2 1 2 4 1 2 3 1 2 1
1 2 4 1 2 2

e + + +
+ + s




N k t h t f p t f t h L t f t h L I
t f t h p t f t h L t f t h L t f t h L
t h t t h T p t f t h L t f t h L I
k k k
k k k k
k k

Act the above inequality with )) ( ), ( (
1 2 2
t f t h L
k
;then,

, X X L :
1
,

) 20 ( )) ( ), ( ( , ) ( ), ( ( , )) ( , ), ( ( (
2 1 2 3 1 2 1 2 2
e + s s

N k t h t f p K t f t h p K t h t t h T p
k k k k
u

Where )) ( ), ( (
1 2 2 1 2 , 2
t f t h p K K
k k
= and )) ( ), ( (
1 2 2 1 2 , 3
t f t h p K K
k k
= .
It is clear that {
1 2 , 2 k
K },{
1 2 , 3 k
K } subsets of , and + < + <
1 2 , 3 1 2 , 2
sup , sup
k k k k
K K by
2 1
l l
<1and + <
3
l .then its follows from the lemma (3) and (17)that

) 21 ( , ) ( ), ( ( ) ( ), ( (
1 2 1 2 , 3 1 2 1 2 , 2
+

u
e
t f t h p K t f t h p K
k k k k



Which together with lemma (2.6)and (20) implies that ( ) u = ) ), ( ( ), ( t t h T t h p
Therefore ) ( ) ), ( ( t h t t h T = by (p1) and( p3).similarly we can show that ) ( ) ), ( ( t h t t h S = .
Hence ) (t h is common random fixed point of T and
Mathematical Theory and Modeling www.iiste.org
ISSN 2224-5804 (Paper) ISSN 2225-0522 (Online)
Vol.4, No.8, 2014

84
Now we show the uniqueness of fixed point. Let ) (t f and ) (t h be two common random fixed point of T
and S then by (*) and (p3) ) 3 , 2 ( : = i X X L
i
,
| |
| |
| | ) 22 ( )), ( ), ( ( )) ( ), ( ( 2 )) ( ), ( ( )) ( ), ( ( )) ( ), ( (
)) ( ), ( ( )) ( ), ( ( )) ( ), ( ( )) ( ), ( (
)) ( ), ( ( )) ( ), ( ( 2 )) ( ), ( (
)) ), ( ( ), ( ( )) ), ( ( ), ( ( )) ( ), ( (
)) ), ( ( ), ( ( )) ( ), ( ( ) ), ( ( ), ( ( )) ( ), ( ( ) ), ( ), ( ( )) ( ), ( (
)) ), ( ( )), ), ( ( ( )) ( ), ( (
4 3 2 1
3 2
4 1
4
3 2 1
+ + + s
+ +
+ =
+ +
+ + s
=
t f t h p t f t h L t f t h L t f t h L t f t h L
t f t f p t f t h L t h t h p t f t h L
t f t h p t f t h L t f t h L
t t h T t f p t t f S t h p t f t h L
t t f S t f p t f t h L t t h T t h p t f t h L t f t h p t f t h L
t t f S t t h T p t f t h p

And so

| | ) 23 ( )), ( ), ( ( )) ( ), ( ( 2 )) ( ), ( ( )) ( ), ( ( )) ( ), ( (
4 3 2 1
t f t h p t f t h L t f t h L t f t h L t f t h L I

It follow from (3) that the inverse of
| | )) ( ), ( ( 2 )) ( ), ( ( )) ( ), ( ( )) ( ), ( (
4 3 2 1
t f t h L t f t h L t f t h L t f t h L I

exists(denoted by)
| |
1
4 3 2 1
)) ( ), ( ( 2 )) ( ), ( ( )) ( ), ( ( )) ( ), ( (

t f t h L t f t h L t f t h L t f t h L I and
| | , e
1
4 3 2 1
)) ( ), ( ( 2 )) ( ), ( ( )) ( ), ( ( )) ( ), ( ( t f t h L t f t h L t f t h L t f t h L I by Neumanns formula
with| |
1
4 3 2 1
)) ( ), ( ( 2 )) ( ), ( ( )) ( ), ( ( )) ( ), ( (

t f t h L t f t h L t f t h L t f t h L I ;then u = )) ( ), ( ( t f t h p
and hence ) ( ) ( t f t h = by (p1) and (p3)the proof is completed.

REFERENCES:
1. A.T. Bharucha-Reid, Random Integral equations, Mathematics in Science and Engineer-
ing, vol. 96, Academic Press, New York(1972).
2. A.T. Bharucha-Reid, Fixed point theorems in Probabilistic analysis Bulletin of the
American Mathematical Society, 82(5) (1976), 641-657.
3. C.J. Himmelberg, Measurable relations, Fundamenta Mathematicae, 87 (1975), 53-72.
4. D.H. Wagner, Survey of measurable selection theorem, SIAM Journal on Control and
Optimization, 15(5) (1977), 859-903
5. I. Beg, Random fixed points of random operators satisfying semi contractivity conditions
Mathematics Japonica, 46(1) (1997), 151-155.
6. I. Beg, Approximation of random fixed points in normed spaces Nonlinear Analysis
51(8) (2002), 1363-1372.
7. I. Beg and M. Abbas, Equivalence and stability of random fixed point iterative procedures
Journal of Applied Mathematics and Stochastic Analysis, (2006), 19 pages
8. I. Beg and M. Abbas, Iterative procedures for solutions of random operator equations in Banach spaces,
Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 315(1) (2006), 181-201.
9. L.-G. Huang and X. Zhang, Cone metric spaces and fixed point theorems of contractive
mappings, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 332(2) (2007), 1468-1476
10. M. Abbas and G. Jungck, Common fixed point results for non commuting mappings
continuity in cone metric spaces, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 341 (2008), 416-420.
11. N.S. Papageorgiou, Random fixed point theorems for measurable multifunctions
in Banach spaces, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, 97(3) (1986),507- 514.
12. N.S. Papageorgiou, On measurable multifunctions with stochastic domain, Journal of
Australian Mathematical Society. Series A, 45(2) (1988), 204-216.
13. O. Hans, Reduzierende zufallige transformationen, Czechoslovak Mathematical Journal
(82) (1957), 154-1587.
14. O. Hans, Random operator equations, Proceeding of the 4th Berkeley Symposium on
Mathematical Statistics and Probability, Vol. II, University of California Press, California, (1961), 185-202.
15. R. Penaloza, A characterization of renegotiation proof contracts via random fixed points
in Banach spaces, working paper 269, Department of Economics, University of Brasilia,
Brasilia, December (2002).
. 16 Sh. Rezapour, A review on topological properties of cone metric spaces, in Proceedings
of the International Conference on Analysis, Topology and Appl. (ATA 08), Vrinjacka
Mathematical Theory and Modeling www.iiste.org
ISSN 2224-5804 (Paper) ISSN 2225-0522 (Online)
Vol.4, No.8, 2014

85
Banja, Serbia, May-June (2008).
17. Sh. Rezapour and R. Hamlbarani, Some notes on the paper "Cone metric spaces and
fixed point theorems of contractive mappings", J. Math. Anal. Appl., 345(2) (2008),
719-724.
18. S. Itoh, Random fixed point theorems with an application to random differential equations
in Banach spaces, Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 67(2) (1979),
261-273.
19. V.B. Dhagat, R. Shrivastav and V. Patel, Fixed point theorems in cone random metric
spaces, Advances in Fixed Point Theory, 2(3) (2012), 357-363.
20.V.M. Sehgal and S.P. Singh, On random approximations and a random fixed point
theorem for set valued mappings, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society,
95(1) (1985), 91-94.










The IISTE is a pioneer in the Open-Access hosting service and academic event
management. The aim of the firm is Accelerating Global Knowledge Sharing.

More information about the firm can be found on the homepage:
http://www.iiste.org

CALL FOR JOURNAL PAPERS
There are more than 30 peer-reviewed academic journals hosted under the hosting
platform.
Prospective authors of journals can find the submission instruction on the
following page: http://www.iiste.org/journals/ All the journals articles are available
online to the readers all over the world without financial, legal, or technical barriers
other than those inseparable from gaining access to the internet itself. Paper version
of the journals is also available upon request of readers and authors.

MORE RESOURCES
Book publication information: http://www.iiste.org/book/

IISTE Knowledge Sharing Partners
EBSCO, Index Copernicus, Ulrich's Periodicals Directory, JournalTOCS, PKP Open
Archives Harvester, Bielefeld Academic Search Engine, Elektronische
Zeitschriftenbibliothek EZB, Open J-Gate, OCLC WorldCat, Universe Digtial
Library , NewJour, Google Scholar


Business, Economics, Finance and Management Journals PAPER SUBMISSION EMAIL
European Journal of Business and Management EJBM@iiste.org
Research Journal of Finance and Accounting RJFA@iiste.org
Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development JESD@iiste.org
Information and Knowledge Management IKM@iiste.org
Journal of Developing Country Studies DCS@iiste.org
Industrial Engineering Letters IEL@iiste.org
Physical Sciences, Mathematics and Chemistry Journals PAPER SUBMISSION EMAIL
Journal of Natural Sciences Research JNSR@iiste.org
Journal of Chemistry and Materials Research CMR@iiste.org
Journal of Mathematical Theory and Modeling MTM@iiste.org
Advances in Physics Theories and Applications APTA@iiste.org
Chemical and Process Engineering Research CPER@iiste.org
Engineering, Technology and Systems Journals PAPER SUBMISSION EMAIL
Computer Engineering and Intelligent Systems CEIS@iiste.org
Innovative Systems Design and Engineering ISDE@iiste.org
Journal of Energy Technologies and Policy JETP@iiste.org
Information and Knowledge Management IKM@iiste.org
Journal of Control Theory and Informatics CTI@iiste.org
Journal of Information Engineering and Applications JIEA@iiste.org
Industrial Engineering Letters IEL@iiste.org
Journal of Network and Complex Systems NCS@iiste.org
Environment, Civil, Materials Sciences Journals PAPER SUBMISSION EMAIL
Journal of Environment and Earth Science JEES@iiste.org
Journal of Civil and Environmental Research CER@iiste.org
Journal of Natural Sciences Research JNSR@iiste.org
Life Science, Food and Medical Sciences PAPER SUBMISSION EMAIL
Advances in Life Science and Technology ALST@iiste.org
Journal of Natural Sciences Research JNSR@iiste.org
Journal of Biology, Agriculture and Healthcare JBAH@iiste.org
Journal of Food Science and Quality Management FSQM@iiste.org
Journal of Chemistry and Materials Research CMR@iiste.org
Education, and other Social Sciences PAPER SUBMISSION EMAIL
Journal of Education and Practice JEP@iiste.org
Journal of Law, Policy and Globalization JLPG@iiste.org
Journal of New Media and Mass Communication NMMC@iiste.org
Journal of Energy Technologies and Policy JETP@iiste.org
Historical Research Letter HRL@iiste.org
Public Policy and Administration Research PPAR@iiste.org
International Affairs and Global Strategy IAGS@iiste.org
Research on Humanities and Social Sciences RHSS@iiste.org
Journal of Developing Country Studies DCS@iiste.org
Journal of Arts and Design Studies ADS@iiste.org