In the General Method some concepts of the diagonal compression field theory are mixed with the truss model principles. In determining the minimum effective web width b v'the diameters of ungrouted ducts shall be subtracted from the web width at the level of these ducts. In the case of torsion, even at high shear stresses, this assumption seems too conservative. It would unduly penalize thin web members not subject to torsion.
Original Description:
Original Title
Proposed Design Procedures for Shear and Torsion in Reinforced and Prestressed Concrete Ramirez_part13
In the General Method some concepts of the diagonal compression field theory are mixed with the truss model principles. In determining the minimum effective web width b v'the diameters of ungrouted ducts shall be subtracted from the web width at the level of these ducts. In the case of torsion, even at high shear stresses, this assumption seems too conservative. It would unduly penalize thin web members not subject to torsion.
In the General Method some concepts of the diagonal compression field theory are mixed with the truss model principles. In determining the minimum effective web width b v'the diameters of ungrouted ducts shall be subtracted from the web width at the level of these ducts. In the case of torsion, even at high shear stresses, this assumption seems too conservative. It would unduly penalize thin web members not subject to torsion.
In the General Method in contrast with the CEB-Refined and Swiss
Code approaches, the actions not considered in the truss model are introduced indirectly only in the geometry of the truss model (variable angle of inclination of the diagonal compression strut). The compression field theory has not yet been extended to the design for combined shear and torsion. Thus, a somewhat al ternative simplified approach is taken in the General Method proposed in the 1982 Draft of the Canadian Code. In the General Method some concepts of the diagonal compression field theory are mixed with the truss model principles. For design purposes the use of an equation is suggested for the strut inclination which simplifies the different relations for shear and torsion. The design limits for the angle ~ i n degrees) of the diagonal compression strut are given in Eq. 2.26. 10 + 110K < ~ < 80 - 110K (2.26) K in the case of shear is given by Eq. 2.27 (2.27) where b v is the stirrup center to center dimension in the direction of the web resisting shear, but need not be less than 1/2 b w It must be noted that, the value of b v ' not the minimum web width b w ' is used to compute the level of shear stress acting on the member. This proposi tion seems more logical in the case of torsion where the high tension stresses induced in the outer shell of the member would induce 34 the unrestrained cover to spall off. However, in the case of shear, even at high shear stresses, this assumption seems too conservative. It would unduly penalize thin web members not subject to torsion. In determining the minimum effective web width b v ' the diameters of ungrouted ducts or one half the diameters of the grouted ducts, shall be subtracted from the web width at the level of these ducts. The term d v represents the effective shear depth and can be taken as the flexural lever arm but need not be taken less than the vertical distance between centers of bars or prestressing t e n ~ n s in the corners of the stirrups. The term is simply a capacity reduction factor. Suggested value would be 0.85 for both shear and torsion. For the case in which torsion interacts with shear the term K in Eq. 2.26 is defined as Vu T Ph K = (--:-"'-=-f -;-, '-="b-'-="d- + ---,u=---=2=) 'f' "'f' A c v v ~ c oh (2.28) where Ph is the outer perimeter of the centerline of the closed transverse torsion reinforcement, AOh is the area enclosed by the centerline of the exterior closed torsion reinforcement, and is a capacity reduction factor. The cross-sectional dimensions are considered adequate to avoid crushi ng of the concrete in the web if it is possible to choose a value of K between the limits suggested in Eq. 2.26. In the General Method the shear force Vu minus the vertical component of the effective prestressing force, in the case of 35 prestressed concrete members with inclined tendons, must be equal to or less than the nominal shear resistance Vn of the section. (2.29) where Vp is the vertical component of the effective prestressing force, and is a capacity reduction factor. The nominal shear resistance Vn is entirely provided by the truss action (inclined concrete struts and steel reinforcement). The shear carried by the truss is given by (2.30 ) Equation 2.30 follows directly from Eq. 3.63 of Report 248-2 and is derived from equilibrium conditions in the truss model, with the exception that d v is the effective shear depth measured center-to-center of the horizontal legs of the stirrup reinforcement instead of being measured between the centroids of the longitudinal bars. Due to the inclination of the diagonal compression field it is necessary to provide an additional area of longitudinal reinforcement to take care of the horizontal component N of the diagonal compression field. This horizontal component produces a longitudinal tension force which is assumed to be acting mid-depth of the truss model. If a top and bottom chord capable of resisting the applied tension force are provided the tension force per chord becomes N = [V u cotan Q' ]/2 (2.31) 36 Thus, the additional area of longitudinal steel required in the tension chord is (2.32) which follows directly from Eq. 3.65 derived in Sec. 3.5.2 of Report 248-2 and is from the equilibrium equations of the truss model. The design procedure for the case of torsion in the General Method considers the case of compatibility and equilibrium torsion. In the case of compatibility torsion, this is to say in the case of a statically indeterminate structure where reduction of torsional moment in a member can occur due to redistribution of internal forces, the design moment Tu need not be greater than 0.61 Tocr' where Tocr represents the torsional strength of the uncracked cross section. It is suggested that Tocr be taken as for nonprestressed members, and T ocr 4 "A1f' ['1 + c (2.33) f pc ] O. 5 4 "A If' (2.34) c for prestressed members. Ac is the cross-sectional area of the member, Pc is the perimeter of the member, 'A is a modification factor to account for different types of concrete ('A= 1 for normal density concrete), and fpc is the compressive stress in the concrete (after allowance for all prestress losses) at centroid of the cross section