You are on page 1of 5

Name of Employee: Arturo S.

Albay Name of Rater:


Position: Teacher I Position:
Review Period: Date of Review:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:
Weight PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RATING SCORE
per KRA ( Quality, Efficiency, RESULTS
Timeliness)
* Participated in City Government * June 2014- * 115-129% * Project accomplishment with partial
Activities March 2015 completion
* Conduct regular/periodic PTCA * June 2014- * 115-129% * Project accomplishment with partial
meeting/conference March 2015 completion
* Visited parents of the student * June 2014- * 115-129% * Project accomplishment with partial
needing monitoring/follow-up March 2015 completion
* Professional * Participated in seminar/trainings * June 2014- * 115-129% * Active participation in selected
Growth and workshops March 2015 projects/events/activities
Development * Conducted Action Research * June 2014- *100-114% * 1 Action Research
March 2015
* To get the score, the rating is multiplied by the weight assigned OVERALL
RATING FOR
ACCOMPLISH-
MENTS
Arturo S. Albay
Ratee
DEPED RPMS Form- Teacher I 3
Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form
TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
Rater
MFOs KRAs Objectives TIMELINE
TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING
Name of Employee: Arturo S. Albay Name of Rater:
Position: Teacher I Position:
Review Period: Date of Review:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:
Weight PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RATING SCORE
per KRA ( Quality, Efficiency, RESULTS
Timeliness)
* Teaching- * Prepared lesson plan * June 2014- *Attained * Had 4 of the 5 parts of the
Learning Process of activities including March 2015 115-129% of lesson plan
appropriate, adequate the desired
and updated instructional learning
materials competencies
* Facilitated learning * June 2014- * 115-129% based * The teacher explained the
in the secondary school March 2015 on the approved importance of the goal and its
through functional lesson budget of work appropriate to the students
plan and different
teaching strategies
* Initiated discipline of * June 2014- * Student were * The students were 115-129%
studentsincluding class- March 2015 115-129% guided guided in the observation of
room rules, guidelines and in the observation classroom rules and guidelines
individual and group task of classroom rules are evidence by descriptive
and guidelines rating
* Monitored attendance, * June 2014- * 115-129% * Safety, orderliness and
diversity appreciation, safe March 2015 maintained cleanliness of the classroom
positive and motivating
environment
TIMELINE
Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form
TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
MFOs KRAs Objectives
Name of Employee: Arturo S. Albay Name of Rater:
Position: Teacher I Position:
Review Period: Date of Review:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:
Weight PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RATING SCORE
per KRA ( Quality, Efficiency, RESULTS
Timeliness)
* Students * Monitored and evaluated * June 2014- * 115-129% * Students portfolio contained
Outcomes and maintained student' March 2015 maintained 100-114% of his accomplishment
progress
* Maintained updated pupils/ * June 2014- *100-114% * Class record reflected the bases
student's school records March 2015 maintained of 100-114% of students rating in
all areas handled
* Conducted Pre-Test and * June 2014- * 115-129% Pre-Test and Post-Test were
Post-Test March 2015 administered in all components
of MAPEH
* Community * Call for the parents/guardian * June 2014- * 115-129% * Teacher planned meeting/conducted
Involvement of the students to update his/ March 2015 meeting and producing set of agree-
her class standing or behavior ment and partial accomplishment of
both parents and teacher
* Undertaken/initiated by * June 2014- * 115-129% * Project accomplishment with partial
BE GLAD/GAD events/projects/ March 2015 completion
activities w/external funding or
sponsorship
Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form
MFOs KRAs Objectives TIMELINE
TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
Name of Employee: Arturo S. Albay Name of Rater:
Position: Teacher I Position:
Review Period: Date of Review:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:
Weight PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RATING SCORE
per KRA ( Quality, Efficiency, RESULTS
Timeliness)
MFOs KRAs Objectives TIMELINE
Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form
TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION

You might also like