Professional Documents
Culture Documents
(388) 0.351
(409)
Female 0.263
(230) 0.403
(233)
Othernon-violent delinquency
(36 items, maximum score 144)
Male 0.331
(381) 0.368
(402)
Female )0.001
NS
(226) 0.248
(228)
Totalviolence and other
(45 items, maximum score 180)
Male 0.391
(381) 0.390
(401)
Female 0.055
NS
(226) 0.308
(228)
p < 0:001.
Table 3
Internal-consistency reliability of the MVQ factors
MVQ factor Number of
items
Cronbach
alphamales
(valid N)
Cronbach
alphafemales
(valid N)
Average inter-item
correlations males
Average inter-item
correlations females
F1. Machismo 42 0.914 (399) 0.861 (243) 0.212 0.129
F2. Acceptance 14 0.755 (424) 0.728 (246) 0.184 0.160
Table 2
Means and standard deviations of MVQ factors scores and t-tests of dierences between males and females
Factor Males (SD) (valid N) Female (SD) (valid N) t-value
F1. Machismo 9.23 (7.62) (400) 5.37 (5.19) (243) )6.98
*
F2. Acceptance 10.33 (2.85) (424) 6.39 (3.08) (246) )16.73
*
p < 0:001.
196 J.S. Walker / Personality and Individual Dierences 38 (2005) 187201
would show more violence related cognitions was supported by the data. Both men and women
showed strong signicantly positive correlations between self-reported violence (nine violence
items from the Self Report Delinquency Scale UK) and scores on both factors, machismo and
acceptance. For men, machismo was the strongest predictor of violence, and also for men, ma-
chismo and acceptance predicted non-violent delinquency. However, for women, violence was
most strongly predicted by acceptance, and although acceptance also predicted non-violent
delinquency in women, machismo did not.
4. Discussion
This study demonstrated that attitudes, beliefs and rules that theoretically relate to violence and
aggression can be measured, and correlate with self-reported violent behaviour. The factor
analysis of the MVQ showed that these beliefs are associated with violence for both men and
women and comprise two robust and reliable factors: machismo and acceptance of violence.
The Attitudes Towards Violence Scale (Funk et al., 1999) also factor analysed into two factors,
culture of violence which shows some similarity to acceptance of violence, and reactive violence
which has some commonality with machismo. However, the Attitudes Towards Violence Scale
was brief (15 items), measured specic attitudes seen to be important for children, and was not
validated against violent behaviour even in self report. The rst two factors (of four) on the
Attitudes towards Guns and Violence Questionnaire (Shapiro et al., 1997) were aggressive re-
sponse to shame and comfort with aggression, which are also similar to machismo and
acceptance respectively. The AGVQ, did correlate with self-reported gun possession and violence,
but the measure was specically designed to assess gun related attitudes and attitudes towards
gun violence; it was designed for use with children rather than as a clinical tool for adults.
This study used a large sample with good representation of the diversity of socio-economic and
ethnic/cultural backgrounds of young people between the age of 16 and 19 in the London area.
Such a large sample made the use of factor analysis appropriate and gave meaningful factors, with
good alpha reliabilities, which correlated well with self-reported violence.
The two factors that emerged were interesting at a theoretical and clinical level. The rst
machismo seems to relate to the stereotypical expectations of men, to do with toughness and
manliness. The attitudes reected suggest that violence and aggression are not only expected of
men, but are desirable in that they are associated with strength and assertiveness; the implication
being that if you are violent, you are strong and thus more of a man than those who back down or
do not ght. This is entirely consistent with the theoretical basis of the questionnaire (Gilligan,
1996; Salmivalli, 2001; Walker & Bright, in preparation); with the authors clinical experience; and
clinicians working in prisons and secure hospital facilities will be aware of the importance of
machismo, particularly in all male environments. What is so interesting in this study, is that such
views are prevalent in both men and women (more so in men) from mid to late adolescence, in
society in general. Furthermore, as predicted, the prevalence of these attitudes and beliefs is also
associated with a salient behavioural outcome, namely violent and aggressive behaviour. This
nding is consistent with other violence research (Doucette-Gates et al., 1999; Shapiro et al., 1997;
Slaby & Guerra, 1988) and general psychological literature (Kraus, 1995) which supports the
correlation between attitudes and behaviour.
J.S. Walker / Personality and Individual Dierences 38 (2005) 187201 197
The questionnaire was primarily based on males, who comprise almost the entire population of
referrals for violence, aggression and anger management (Siddle, Jones, & Awenat, 2003), com-
prise the majority of the prison population, a signicant proportion of whom are incarcerated for
violence oences. This study was in line with societal trends in that male students reported a
signicantly higher score for violent behaviour (2.92, n 452) on the Self Report Delinquency
Scale compared to women (1.49, n 279, t 8:675, p < 0:001). This is similar to ndings of
gender dierences for anger in prison inmates (Suter, Byrne, Byrne, Howells, & Day, 2002).
The clinical importance of this study is that while certain easily measurable factors predict
violencebeing male, having a history of violence (Martinez, 1997). Being male does not narrow
the eld in terms of prediction, nor is it a factor amenable to change. Violent history is another
static risk factor, but some men who have been violent in the past are able to give up violence and
some do not, the history does not help the assessor determine who is who. The risk of violence
may be related to personality factors such as tendency to anger or impulsivity, but these tend to be
more stable and physiologically determined leaving them perhaps less amenable to change. The
present author believed there to be an important omission in violence researcha measure which
could pick up the important beliefs that may support or be injunctions against violencei.e.
cognitive risk and protective factors. The rst factormachismoappears to be just such a
collection of risk factors, including attitudes, beliefs and rules which support, justify or show an
expectation of violence, particularly in men; while the acceptance of violence seems to refer to a
number of attitudes and beliefs which suggest either an acceptance or an outright rejection of
violence in society, both in individual behaviour, and in the media.
From the literature it was clear that existing measures were either too specic (AGVQ), too
brief to include the full range of important cognitions in violence (ATVS), assessed certain aspects
of cognitions in violence (FAVT), or were designed for use with children rather than with adults in
clinical and custodial settings. In fact, the closest comparable measure to the MVQ in terms of
theoretical background, development and subject matter is the FAVT. The subscales of the FAVT
(social mistrust; perceived disrespect/disregard; negative critical thoughts; and, expression of overt
anger) appear to be complimentary to rather than overlapping with the MVQ, and from a cog-
nitive perspective represent triggers or automatic thoughts for aggression and violence. A measure
was required that covered the additional important cognitions (in particular dysfunctional
assumptions or rules), which predicted violent behaviour and was consistent with existing research
ndings in the related eld of attitudes towards violence. The MVQ is the result of this endeavour,
but the performance of the measure in clinical and forensic settings remains to be evaluated.
The MVQ does not measure personality, however the factors may be relatively stable because
they are likely to be reinforced by peers, media and confrontational situations (being laughed at
for backing down, or the belief that it is harder to walk away from a ght). The collection of
items seemed to reect a cognitive style (rather than a cognitive distortion), that had important
behavioural correlates. The cognitive style most likely to put people (especially men) at risk of
violence is a tendency towards machismo in combination with an acceptance of violence. As with
gender dierences found in related research into anger (Suter et al., 2002), this cognitive style is
expressed dierently and to diering extents by men and women, and is a dimensional concept
that is continuous with normal thinking. Given that machismo and acceptance are cognitive
styles, having some independence but also correlated, that may combine to elevate risk, it is
helpful that they are measured separately on the MVQ. Moreover, being cognitive styles rather
198 J.S. Walker / Personality and Individual Dierences 38 (2005) 187201
than personality dimensions means that they may be amenable to change, either through matu-
ration or through direct intervention. It would be interesting to assess whether the convicted
violent oender who does not repeat their violence shows a drop in acceptance and machismo
which could also be reinforced through incarceration. It may be that cognitive therapy approaches
to violence could work at the cognitive style level and reduce risk through challenging machismo
and acceptance of violence. A change in cognitive style on the MVQ should be measurable, but
the performance of the MVQ in clinical settings is an area for future research.
One of the limitations of this study in terms of validating the MVQ was that no test-retest
reliability analysis could be completed within the timescale. Such information, together with
information about change following interventions aimed at challenging violent cognitive styles
would be a signicant contribution to the literature. Such projects, which would necessarily be
conducted with clinical and oender samples, comprise the future work of the author and others.
Future work will also include the comparison of the MVQ factors with other personality
variables and comparable measures. It is predicted that, although the MVQ does not measure
personality, the cognitive styles assessed by the measure are likely to be relatively stable and
therefore relate to personality traits. In particular, an association would be predicted between
MVQ factors and antisocial personality characteristics and oending related traits.
Acknowledgements
Prof. Gisli Gudjonsson for supervision, support and encouragement, Dr. Paul Barrett for
patient and comprehensive statistical help, Dr. Lisa Firestone for enthusiasm about the MVQ and
reviewing the project; the South London and Maudsely NHS Trust for allowing me time to
undertake this research; and, the schools, teachers and pupils who took part in the research.
References
Abel, G. G., Gore, D. K., Holland, C. L., & Camp, N. (1989). The measurement of the cognitive distortions of child
molesters. Annals of Sex Research, 2(2), 135152.
Beck, A. T., & Freeman, A. (1990). Cognitive therapy of personality disorders. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
Beck, R., & Fernandez, E. (1998). Cognitive-behavioural therapy in the treatment of anger: a meta-analysis. Cognitive
Therapy and Research, 22(1), 6374.
Bjrkly, S. (1997). Clinical assessment of dangerousness in psychotic patients: some risk indicators and pitfalls.
Aggression and Violent Behavior, 2(2), 167178.
Blumenthal, S., Gudjonsson, G., & Burns, J. (1999). Cognitive distortions and blame attribution in sex oenders against
adults and children. Child Abuse & Neglect, 23(2), 129143.
Bumby, K. M. (1996). Assessing the cognitive distortions of child molesters and rapists: development and validation of
the MOLEST and RAPE Scales. Sexual Abuse: Journal of Research & Treatment, 8(1), 3754.
Burt, M. R. (1980). Cultural myths and supports for rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38(2), 217230.
Carroll, A., Durkin, K., Houghton, S., & Hattie, J. (1996). An adaptation of Maks self reported delinquency scale for
Western Australian adolescents. Australian Journal of Psychology, 48(1), 17.
Comrey, A. L., & Lee, H. B. (1992). A rst course in factor analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Cornell, D. G., Warren, J., Hawk, G., Staord, E., Oram, G., & Pine, D. (1996). Psychopathy in instrumental and
reactive violent oenders. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64, 783790.
J.S. Walker / Personality and Individual Dierences 38 (2005) 187201 199
DFES: Department for Education and Skills. School and College Performance Tables 2002. HMSO.
Doucette-Gates, A., Firestone, R. W., & Firestone, L. A. (1999). Assessing violent thoughts: the relationship between
thought processes and violent behaviour. Psychologica Belgica, 39(2), 113134.
DSM-IV, (1994). American Psychiatric Association: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth
Edition. Washington DC, American Psychiatric Association.
Eley, T. C., Lichtenstein, P., & Mott, T. E. (2003). A longitudinal behavioural genetic analysis of the etiology of
aggressive and nonaggressive antisocial behaviour. Development and Psychopathology, 15(2), 383402.
Farrington, D. P., & West, D. J. (1993). Criminal, penal and life histories of chronic oenders; Risk and protective
factors and early identication. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 3(4), 492523.
Field, A. (2000). Discovering statistics: using SPSS for windows. London: Sage Publications.
Fonagy, P. (2003). Towards a developmental understanding of violence. British Journal of Psychiatry, 183, 190192.
Funk, J. B., Elliott, R., Urman, M. L., Flores, G. T., & Mock, R. M. (1999). The attitudes towards violence scale: a
measure for adolescents. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 14(11), 11231136.
Gilligan, J. (1996). Violence: reections on our deadliest epidemic. London, UK: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Gothelf, D., Apter, A., & Van Praag, H. M. (1997). Measurement of aggression in psychiatric patients. Psychiatry
Research, 71, 8395.
Hare, R. D. (1991). Manual for the hare psychopathy checklist-revised. Toronto: Multi-Health Systems.
Hare, R. D., Harpur, T. J., Hakstian, A. R., Forth, A. E., Hart, S. D., & Newman, J. P. (1990). The revised
psychopathy checklist: descriptive statistics, reliability, and factor structure. Psychological Assessment: A Journal of
Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 2, 338341.
Hayashino, D. S., Wurtele, S. K., & Klebe, K. J. (1995). Child molesters: an examination of cognitive factors. Journal of
Interpersonal Violence, 10(1), 106116.
ICD-10 (1992). International classication of diseases10 classication of mental and behavioural disorders: clinical
descriptions and diagnostic guidelines. Geneva: World Health Organisation.
Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39, 3136.
Kass, R. A., & Tinsley, H. E. A. (1979). Factor analysis. Journal of Leisure Research, 11, 210238.
Klein, P. (1994). An easy guide to factor analysis. London: Routledge.
Kraus, S. J. (1995). Attitudes and the prediction of behaviour: a meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Personality
and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 5875.
McGrath, M., Cann, S., & Konopasky, R. (1998). New measures of defensiveness, empathy, and cognitive distortions
for sexual oenders against children. Sexual Abuse: Journal of Research & Treatment, 10(1), 2536.
McGuire, J., & Priestly, P. (1995). Reviewing What Works: past, present and future. In J. McGuire (Ed.), What works:
reducing reoending guidelines from research and practice. Chichester, UK: Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Mak, A. S. (1993). A self report delinquency scale for Australian adolescents. Australian Journal of Psychology, 45(2),
7579.
Martinez, J. R. (1997). Predictors of serious violent recidivism. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 12(2), 216228.
Miller, T. Q., Smith, T. W., Turner, C. W., Guijarro, M. L., & Hallet, A. J. (1996). A meta-analytic review of research
on hostility and physical health. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 322348.
Monahan, J. (1984). The prediction of violent behavior: toward a second generation of theory and policy. American
Journal of Psychiatry, 141, 1015.
Monahan, J., & Steadman, H. J. (1994). Violence and mental disorder. Chicago, USA: The University of Chicago Press.
Novaco, R. W. (1975). Anger control: the development and evaluation of an experimental treatment. Lexington: D.C.
Heath & Co.
Novaco, R. W. (1994). Anger as a risk factor for violence among the mentally disordered. In J. Monahan & H. J.
Steadman (Eds.), Violence and mental disorder. Chicago, USA: The University of Chicago Press.
Novaco, R. W., & Welsh, W. N. (1989). Anger disturbances: cognitive mediation and clinical prescriptions. In K.
Howells & C. R. Hollin (Eds.), Clinical approaches to violence. Chichester, UK: John Wiley and Sons, Ltd.
Robinson, D., & Porporino, F. J. (2001). Programming in cognitive skills: the reasoning and rehabilitation programme.
In C. Hollin (Ed.), Handbook of oender assessment and treatment (pp. 179193). Chichester: Wiley.
Salmivalli, C. (2001). Feeling good about oneself, being bad to others. Remarks on self-esteem, hostility, and aggressive
behaviour. Aggression and Violent Behaviour, 6, 375393.
200 J.S. Walker / Personality and Individual Dierences 38 (2005) 187201
Shapiro, J. P., Dorman, R. L., Burkey, W. M., Welker, C. J., & Clough, J. B. (1997). Development and factor analysis
of a measure of youth attitudes towards guns and violence. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 26, 311320.
Siddle, R., Jones, F., & Awenat, F. (2003). Group cognitive behaviour therapy for anger: a pilot study. Behavioural and
Cognitive Psychotherapy, 31(1), 6983.
Slaby, R. G., & Guerra, N. G. (1988). Cognitive mediators of aggression in adolescent oenders: 1. Assessment.
Developmental Psychology, 24(4), 580588.
Stevens, J. P. (1992). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Suter, J. M., Byrne, M. K., Byrne, S., Howells, K., & Day, A. (2002). Anger in prisoners: women are dierent from
men. Personality and Individual Dierences, 32, 10871100.
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1996). Using multivariate statistics (third ed.). New York: Harper & Row.
Vanhouche, W., & Vertommen, H. (1999). Assessing cognitive distortions in sex oenders: a review of commonly used
versus recently developed instruments. Psychologica Belgica, 39(23), 163187.
Walker, J. S., & Bright, J. A. (in preparation). A cognitive model and therapeutic approach for working with violence.
Walters, G. D. (1995). The psychological inventory of criminal thinking styles: I. Reliability and preliminary validity.
Criminal Justice & Behavior, 22(3), 307325.
Walters, G. D. (1996). The psychological inventory of criminal thinking styles: Part III. Predictive validity. International
Journal of Oender Therapy & Comparative Criminology, 40(2), 105112.
Ward, T., Hudson, S. M., Johnston, L., & Marshall, W. L. (1997). Cognitive distortions in sex oenders: An integrative
review. Clinical Psychology Review, 17(5), 479507.
J.S. Walker / Personality and Individual Dierences 38 (2005) 187201 201