LEGAL PROFESSION OUTLINE

Note :ky Ate Dagzpoitopapasa

1. Richard 1-5 (5)
2. Dags 6-10(5)
3. Tim 11-15(5)
4. Jessa 16-20(5)
5. Ina 21-25(5)
6. Janina 26-30(5)
7. Lea 31-34(4)
8. Ivan 35-38(4)
9. Moses 39-42(4)
10. mimi 43-47(5)

>>Next time nalangdagdagclakuyamoses lea at ivan


1. Rule 138 ATTORNEYS AND ADMISSION TO THE BAR
1 Who may practice law

1. BAR MATTER NO. 702, May 12, 1994.
See also, Rules 11 to 14 of Bar Matter No. 850, Oct. 2, 2001

`2-6 Requirements for applicants for admission to the bar

2. Re: Application for Admission to the Philippine Bar, Vicente D. Ching, Applicant. [B.M. No. 914.
October 1, 1999]

Good Moral Character:

3. In Re Argosino: Bar Matter No. 712, July 13, 1995
4. Re:Petition of Al Argosino to take the Lawyer's Oath, Bar Matter No. 72, March 19, 1997
5. PurisimaBarba, complainant, vs. Hector S. Pedro, respondent. A.M. No. 545-SBC December 26,
1974

Application under 4 of R 138 (cf. 5)

6. In Re: Petition of Ramon Quisumbing for admission to the Bar,
Bar Matter No. 419 (Nov. 1989)

7-16 Application, Examinations and Passing Average

Admission to the Bar; judgment; SC exclusive power; practice of law is privilege, not right;
etc.

7. In Re: Lanuevo, Aug. 29 1975
8. In Re: Cunanan, 94 Phil. 534

17-9 Admission and Oath, Certificate, Attys Roll (Jul 3 1996)
21-6, 31-7 Authority to Appear, Compensation, Attys Lien
Authority to bind clients

9. cf. Guiang v. Antonio, 218 SCRA 381 and
10. Legarda v. Court of Appeals, 209 SCRA 722
11. Legarda v. CA 195 SCRA 418
12. SMC v. Laguesma, 236 S 595
13. Peo. v. Salido, GR No. 116208, July 5, 1996
14. Tupas v. CA, 193 SCRA 597;
15. Alabanzas v. IAC 204 SCRA 304;
16. Aguila v. CFI Batangas 160 SCRA 352;
17. Pulido v. CA, 122 SCRA 63;
18. Aylion v. Sevilla 156 SCRA 257 (L-79244)
19. Tesoro v. CA, 54 SCRA 296
20. Salongav . CA 269 SCRA 534


Quantum Meruit

21. In Re Testate Estate of Doa Gabina Raquel. Vicente J. Francisco v. AureaMatias G.R. No. L-
16349. January 31, 1964.]

Unlawful retention of funds and charging liens

22. Taada v. Court of Appeals, Oct. 23, 1985
23. Nasser v. Cuevas, 188 SCRA 812
24. Armovit v. Court of Appeals, 202 SCRA 16

Authority to appear for government

25. Orbos v. Civil Service Commission, 189 SCRA 459
26. Gonzales v. Chavez, 205 SCRA 815

20, 27-30 Duties of Attorneys, Suspension and Removal

27. Guiang v. Antonio, id.
28. Legarda v. Court of Appeals, id.

29. TeodoroRegala, et al. v. Sandiganbayan, Republic of the Philippines
30. En-Banc [G.R. No. 105938. September 20, 1996]
31. include separate opinions

32. Luisa Y. Ortega v. CA, G.R. No. L-43155. August 14, 1987
33. Guevarra v. Eala, AC No. 7136, August 1, 2007


Different modes of investigation

Rule 139-B

34. Fernandez v. Grecia, AM No. 3694, June 17, 1993
35. Cf. Yuseco v. DCA Bernad, AM No. 94-1-061-SC, March 29, 1995
36. Barrientos v. Daarol, AC No. 1512, January 29, 1993
37. Balaoing v. Calderon, AM No. RTJ-90-580, April 27, 1993
38. Bautista v. Gonzales, 182 SCRA 151
39. Zaldivar v. Sandiganbayan, G.R. No. 79690-707, Feb. 1, 1989
40. Narag v. Narag,AC No. 3405, June 29, 1998

Rule 138-A, Student Practice Rule (Circular No.19, Dec. 19, 1986)

Rule 139 The Integrated Bar of the Philippines
41. In re Integration of the Philippine Bar, 49 SCRA 22 (1973)
42. In re IBP Elections. 178 SCRA 398 (1989)


Power of the Court to defend itself

43. In re Emil Jurado-- [243 SCRA 299 (1995)] administrative matter, disciplined as lawyer
44. In re Tulfo -- AM 90-4-1545-0 contempt proceeding


What is the practice of law?

45. Cayetano v. Monsod, GR No. 110113, September 3, 1991
46. Mauricio Ulep v. The Legal Clinic, Inc.,En Banc, [Bar Matter No. 553. June 17, 1993]
47. Alawi v. Alauya, AM No. SDC-97-2-P, February 24, 1997