Increased Rate of Delayed Procedures in the Operating Room
Complex of Manila Doctors Hospital from January 20! to "pril 20! QUESTION 1: Please give some background to the proect or program including ho! it originated" #ive some details o$ !hat clinical improvements !ere achieved and ho! the proect improved %ualit& o$ care as a result o$ these improvements" '(a)imum o$ *+, !ords- In line !ith (anila .octors/ 0ision to be the 1eading 2enter o$ E)cellence and 3ellness in the Philippines and the institution/s Theme o$ 4Strengthening the hospital/s capacit& to provide integrated value based health services5 !ith its #oal o$ #$% ma)imal utili6ation o$ services to maintain the sustainabilit& and viabilit& o$ the hospital7 8 stud& entitled 4Increase 9ate o$ .ela&ed Procedures in the Operating 9oom 2omple) o$ (anila .octors :ospital $rom January 20! to "pril 20!&' !as conducted !hich is geared to!ards ma)imall& utili6ing the resources o$ the unit; rendering prompt and %ualit& patient care" This program $ocused on decreasing the rate o$ dela&ed procedures in the O92; determining the causes; $ormulating strategies and thoroughl& implementing them" Since it !as evident in the data gathering that the reason $or having dela&ed procedures in the unit !as 4POO9 2O(P1I8N2E O< .O2TO9S 8N. OUTP8TIENTS TO T:E O92 PO1I2=57 the group sought $or plan o$ actions that !ould address the problem" 2onstant reminders and rein$orcement o$ the O92 polic& to the sta> and doctors !as $acilitated; sending an S(S to in$orm the doctors o$ the arrival o$ their patients in the operating room comple); as !ell as reminding the outpatients about their scheduled operation thru sending o$ S(S" 8nd lastl&; an instruction pamphlet !as $ormulated to be given to the outpatients as their guide as the& arrive in the operating room comple)" 8$ter implementation and evaluation o$ the solutions made; Increased Patients/ Satis$action and 2onvenience to the service catered b& the unit !as noted thru the 4Service E)cellence 8!ard5 $orm that !as given to our outpatients; in !hich having a prompt and %ualit& service !as the topmost comment o$ the patients" 3aiting time o$ the patients prior the procedure7 !hether the& are inpatients or outpatients; !as reduced because doctors !ere able to arrive on time and there$ore procedures started on time causing less errors that leads to a %ualit&; sa$e and prompt care to!ards our clienteles as !ell as ma)imal utili6ation o$ the Operating 9oom 2omple)" QUESTION ?: Please describe ho! the proect !as bene@cial $rom the patient/s perspective and e)perience; and ho! it improved patient care; patient sa$et& or service" Pre$erabl& please present %uanti@able in$ormation such as 4be$ore and a$ter5 measurements i$ an&" '(a)imum ?+, !ords- Prolonged !aiting time $or their scheduled procedures not onl& dela&s the intervention needed b& the patient; but ma& also cause stress and elevated an)iet& to patients !hich could be unsa$e $or the health o$ the patient" To some patients it ma& cause more emotional burden not onl& to themselves but also to their $amilies !aiting $or them to be back in their respective room" 8$ter implementation o$ strategies; dela&ed procedures decreased $rom ABC in the @rst trimester o$ ?,1* to AC in the 1 st trimester o$ ?,1D and 2ustomer Satis$action increased $rom BEC to EBC in the @rst trimester o$ ?,1* and ?,1D respectivel&" Procedures that start on time help minimi6e errors that ma& a>ect to patient/s sa$et&" This !ill improve customer/s satis$action because the service being rendered to them is prompt and ma& minimi6e complaints that can lead to legal charges i$ unable to attend to" Question 3: Please explain what other benefits were derived? Is it simple yet effective, something other departments can also adopt or adapt? Were appropriate analysis tools used or was it only a matter of throwing money at the problem? (Maximum 2 words! This stud& is not onl& bene@cial to our patients $or their increased satis$action and convenience but also to the !hole unit itsel$" Procedures that start on time in the Operating room !ill ease the Fo! o$ scheduled procedures in that particular da&" Overlapping and e)tending o$ time o$ procedures !ill be prevented thus overtime o$ the O92 sta> !ho !ill assist on the procedure that started late !ill be minimi6ed" It !as noted that a$ter the thorough implementation; there !as a decrease @led overtime o$ O92 sta>" .ata gathering suggest that nonGcompliance o$ the doctors and outpatients cause most o$ the dela&s and strategies such as provision o$ cellphone $or O9 use; providing instruction pamphlets and sending an S(S reminder a da& be$ore the schedule o$ procedure $or the outpatients; and in$orming doctors through S(S a da& be$ore and upon arrival o$ their patient proved to be the most e>ective !a& that helped improve our unit/s eHcienc&" (a)imal Utili6ation o$ O9 Suites !as also noted because on time procedures !ill end to the desired and e)pected time and could $acilitate room to accommodate more procedures thus increasing O9 2ensus" Question 4: Please explain how significant were the results or outcomes? "re these measurable? "re there testimonials, awards or other support to show impact on improvement of the department or unit#s service? (Maximum $% words! .ela&ed procedures decreased $rom BBC in the @rst trimester o$ ?,1* to ?C in the @rst trimester o$ ?,1D" 8 decrease o$ B?C in the dela&ed procedures improved man& aspects in out unit such as: 1" .ecreased over time o$ sta> nurses $rom an average o$ +? hours per sta> nurse ever& month do!n to an average o$ 1"+ hours per month in the @rst trimester o$ ?,1* and ?,1D respectivel&" ?" 11C increase in the utili6ation o$ O9 suites in the @rst trimester o$ ?,1* 0ersus ?,1D *" 2ustomer satis$action increased $rom BEC to EBC in the @rst trimester o$ ?,1* and ?,1D respectivel&" D" 1ate outpatients decreased $rom ?,C to 1C +" 1ate doctors in outpatient procedures decreased $rom ??C to ,C A" 1ate doctors in inpatient procedures decreased $rom *?C to ,C "ttachment & '( tech )cheduling with mid shift (no PM schedule! $$ started, $&*+ ended 2 pm, staff went home ', summary report -ustomer .eedbac/ form '(- policy 0efinition of terms )M) template Question 5: Please give some bac/ground to the pro1ect team that originated, studied and developed the pro1ect or program2 (Maximum 2 words! Question 6: Please give any other information, including third party testimonial regarding your pro1ect which you thin/ would help convince the 1udges that this pro1ect (or program! should win this category2 (Maximum * words! 1" .iamond a!ard in ?,1* internal 2IP ?" * rd place in O9N8P Up to 5 supporting file attachments can be submitted with each award entry (Individual files cannot exceed 2 MB) !he following file formats are accepted" #ord $ocument (%doc& %docx) 'xcel (preadsheet (%xls& %xlsx) )ower)oint )resentation (%ppt) *)+ Image (%,pg& %,peg) )$- (%pdf)