Contextual Encoding Strategies: Pathways for Decreasing Age-Related
Deficits in Memory Recall Alison Fietz Student number: 220078965 The University of New England
Word Count: 3981
MEMORY ENCODING STRATEGIES
2
Abstract Various studies have documented diminished capabilities in mnemonic recollection processes of healthy aging adults. Along with the acknowledged cognitive and neuropsychological deficits, recent findings are discovering simultaneous strengths and plasticity. Recall tasks may be associated with a declining ability to self-initiate retrieval processes and providing additional contextual cues during recognition encoding and testing may circumvent this. Data is reviewed that suggests support supplied from the environmental context that information is presented in can improve the performance of older adults. Research suggests singular item memory remains relatively intact compared to associative memory. Strategies such as unitization, which occurs when the different pieces of an association are processed in such a way that they become integrated, are presented. Older adults feel enhanced by, attend more to and recall more positive material than younger adults do; this is discussed as the positivity effect. Recent findings that indicate that the executive processes related to working memory for emotion may be unhindered with age and relative studies are also discussed.
MEMORY ENCODING STRATEGIES
3 Contextual Encoding Strategies: Pathways for Decreasing Age-Related Deficits in Memory Recall In regard to cognitive aging, a substantial body of literature in the last 20 years has documented diminished abilities and impaired memory in older adults, even when spared from dementia (Park, 2012). The overall pattern of data shows decreases in processing speed, working memory (the short-term preservation and movement of material) cued and free recall from long-term memory, source memory (memory for the context of material) as well as divided and selective attention. Nonetheless, recent discoveries in psychological and social sciences are finding that aging and cognitive functioning may be a more malleable and complex process than initially acknowledged. Cognitive performance appears to remain plastic in older adults (Hertzog, Kramer, Wilson, & Lindenberger, 2008) Can encoding strategies target areas within the aging brain; to harness its strengths to decrease deficits? A lot of psychological researchers appear to think so. In a meta-analysis by Verhaeghen, Marcoen, and Goossens (1992) the use of effective encoding strategies saw large improvements in mean memory - 0.78 standard deviations. Luo, Hendriks, and Craik (2007) suggest that support supplied from the environmental context that words or information is presented in can improve the performance of older adults. Facets of the task or context recompense for processing actions that can no longer be carried out automatically by the aging brain. Researchers are revealing more interest in investigating the cognitive strengths that older people are displaying, along with the weaknesses. This could be an inevitable necessity as people in the 65-84-year-old age group are predicted to grow from 2.4 million in 2007 to 4.0 million in 2022 (Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2009). The purpose of the present article is to consider the possible strategies available; in regard to memory encoding and recall in the aging brain. This supplements a broad base of gerontology memory research from MEMORY ENCODING STRATEGIES
4 developmental, neuropsychological and cognitive studies. Therefore, we will specifically focus on two current theoretical approaches and their influences on memory encoding research: dual-processing and socioemotional selectivity theories. These two frameworks appear to contain possible pathways available that could contribute to more positive outcomes in regard to encoding and retrieval in the aging brain. Dual-process models Philosophers and psychologists have been discussing distinctions in memory processing since the time of Aristotle; yet cognitive psychologists only began the formal development of dual-process models in the 1970s. These have indicated that recognition memory ability can be accomplished by either of two distinctly independent types of processes, consistently referred to as recollection and familiarity (Mandler, 1980). A common experience that illustrates this is when you find someone familiar, yet you cant recollect whom they are or where you formerly encountered that person. Most current memory researchers would agree that to substantiate for the existing literature on memory recognition; there are at least two-different types or processes of memory involved. Java (1996) using the remember/know procedure found an age-related reduction in recollection (remembering) responses whereas familiarity (knowing) responses remained unaffected or even showed an increase. Successful recall depends largely on conscious recollection and age-related deficits are larger for recollection than for familiarity (Danckert & Craik, 2013). Despite the differences among the several dual-processing models that have been proposed, there are some general agreements. First, studies of processing speed have revealed that familiarity is quicker than recollection. Under speeded conditions, accurate familiarity based discriminations were made by subjects between items that were not studied and were recently studied. These were made much faster than discriminations that required recollection of specific information, such as where or when an item was initially encountered (Hintzman, MEMORY ENCODING STRATEGIES
5 Caulton, & Levitin, 1998). Second, familiarity and recollection show separate electrophysiological correlates. Scalp recordings of event related potentials (ERPs) during tests of recognition show items that are related to accurate memory for particular detail of the study episode- remembered items; exhibit different spatial and temporal scalp distributions to items that are recognized or familiar (Curran, 2000). Thirdly, there is more severe disruption in recollection than familiarity in subjects that exhibit certain brain injuries. A number of models presume that medial temporal lobe damage (e.g., hippocampus and the neighboring temporal lobe inclusive of the parahippocampul gyrus) see Figure 1, can cause forms of amnesia that dislocates recollection but does not disrupt familiarity. Indicating that the two processes use different areas of the brain. Studies of patients with amnesia show greater impairments on tests based on recollecting information or having to associate items together; than on familiarity or recognizing items (Aggleton & Shaw, 1996)
Figure 1.
Figure 1. Regions of the brain associated with recollection and familiarity memory. From the Neuroanotomical Model within the dual-processing framework (Andrew P. Yonelinas, 2002).
MEMORY ENCODING STRATEGIES
6 The Yonelinas model Some of the dual-process models, such as the one argued by Yonelinas and colleagues (Quamme, Frederick, Kroll, Yonelinas, & Dobbins, 2002) believe that in recollection subjects can retrieve several different aspects of a study episode (spatial and temporal context, associations among distinctive factors of an occasion). Yet for some items subjects are incapable of retrieving any precise information about the study episode. The Yonelinas model describes recollection as a threshold retrieval process and some items fall underneath the recollective threshold. When this happens participants are likely to lean on evaluations of familiarity (Andrew P Yonelinas, 1999). An important component within the Yonelinas model is the idea that it is not expected that familiarity support associative memory for a couple of individual items. Unless these separate, distinct items can be unitized and treated as an individual item (e.g., the way that a mouth, eyes and nose make a face). This idea of associative unitization has formed the basis of various studies into strategies to decrease age-related recall deficits (Chen & Naveh- Benjamin, 2012; Murray & Kensinger, 2013; Ranganath, 2010; Troyer, D'Souza, Vandermorris, & Murphy, 2011; Wegesin, Jacobs, Zubin, Ventura, & Stern, 2000). Recall is more affected than familiarity in older adults, so environmental support to either of these parallel memory processes can help with retrieval problems. Unitization: an encoding strategy In a recent meta-analysis, associative memory deficits were reported in older adults for a wide assortment of materials, including pairs of pictures, word pairs, object-color pairs, face-name and item-spatial associations (Old & Naveh-Benjamin, 2008). Inability to spontaneously utilize effective associative strategies compared to the younger groups, contributes to this decline. According to Giovanello and Schacter (2012) encoding word pairs by using a deep interactive encoding strategy; reduces associative deficits in older adults. An MEMORY ENCODING STRATEGIES
7 example being when participants are inspired to construct a sentence that binds two words together (Matzen & Benjamin, 2013). Unitization happens when the different constituents of an association are processed in an integrative way to form a clear whole. A study by Bastin et al. (2013) tested the hypothesis that age-related variances in associative memory can be condensed if subjects are told to use an encoding strategy that encourages unitization. They used a procedure that previously had success in easing the memory deficits with amnesic patients who had severe impairments in contextual recollection; yet whose memory of item recognition was less affected (Diana, Yonelinas, & Ranganath, 2010). In two experiments performed in the Bastin et al., (2013) study, a group of 20 older and 20 young adults had to learn novel associations between a background colour and a word, underneath two conditions. In the condition that promoted unitization they had to envision that the item was the same colour as the background. This was called the Item Detail condition. In the condition that did not promote unitization, they had to envision the item interacting with another coloured object. This was called the Context Detail condition. A list of 100 concrete nouns and related sentences was used. The words were randomly distributed into two sets of 50. The designation of the sets to either condition was counterbalanced across subjects. At test they had to remember the colour that was linked to each word (source memory). The results from repeated measures ANOVAs in this study were consistent with their hypothesis, that associative encoding strategies can regulate the effects of aging on source memory. By creating elaborative meaning through the use of imaginative sentence generation, a unitized representation of the item and the colour was established in the Item Detail condition. An integrated gestalt of the two components resulted in the creation of a singular novel item representation. Both experiments revealed deficits in source memory MEMORY ENCODING STRATEGIES
8 performance in both young and older participants in the Context Detail condition. By encoding colour as a contextual detail (the item interacting with another object of the same colour) the item and the colour remained separate within the association. In the second experiment, they examined receiver-operating characteristics in the older adults, which suggested that in the Item Detail condition familiarity added more to source memory performance than it did in the Context Detail condition. As the Item Detail condition reduced the item to become the colour, there was not as much need for recollection processes to have to retrieve associations. Relying more on familiarity processes, which are considered more intact among older adults.
See Figure 2. ITEM DETAIL CONDITION CONTEXT DETAIL CONDITION UNITIZED NON-UNITIZED ! ! Green Green cloth-green sock-green ! ! The cloth is green because the waiter The sock has a 100 euro-bill in it used it to clean up spilled pea soup. because the traveller put the bill in his sock to keep it safe.
Red Red turtle-red monkey-red ! ! The turtle is red because the kids at the beach The monkey is on the stop sign painted the shell so it would stand out among to show people that they should the other turtles. turn right to get to the zoo.
Figure 2. A diagrammatic representation of an example of the materials used in the source (colour) memory experiment by Bastin et al., (2013). Young and older adult participants were given encoding instructions that did or did not promote unitization of new item-colour associations.
MEMORY ENCODING STRATEGIES
9 On the contrary, in an associative memory study Jager, Mecklinger, and Kliegel (2010) reported greater age-related deficits for materials (i.e., two very similar faces) they expected would be unitized a lot more easily; compared to difficult to unitize materials (i.e., two highly different faces). Therefore, it appears the efficiency of unitization, as an encoding strategy in older adults could partially be dependent on the type of materials and items that need to be encoded. At least in regard to item-colour associations, the Bastin et al., (2013) study suggests unitization of items at encoding may contribute to reductions in associative memory decline observed in the aged. In conclusion, they do suggest further research is needed into the brain regions that are associated with change in normal aging. In particular the perirhinal and entorhinal cortices, which instigate familiarity activations and the hippocampal areas, which are involved with recollection (Daselaar, Fleck, Dobbins, Madden, & Cabeza, 2006). The benefits and costs and the benefits only accounts of unitization Amongst the research related to dual-processing models and supportive encoding strategies, a lot still seems open to question. Some researchers are suggesting that the mapping of tasks and retrieval processes is not a simple operation. Recent research has demonstrated the benefit of unitization, by encouraging conditions where pairs of stimuli are integrated into a single depiction, which allows familiarity to contribute at retrieval and support deficits in recollection. This has been demonstrated within studies across a wide variety of participant groups, tasks and stimuli (Bastin et al., 2013; Boywitt & Meiser, 2012; Kroll, Yonelinas, Dobbins, & Frederick, 2002; Naveh-Benjamin, Brav, & Levy, 2007; Quamme et al., 2002). Some researchers are proposing that there are two explanations of unitization, the benefits and costs account and the benefits only one. The first, the benefits and costs view argues that at retrieval only the unitized whole is accessible to familiarity- not the individual elements. Consequently, quantifiable costs are involved when trying to MEMORY ENCODING STRATEGIES
10 remember the individual elements of the initial pair. The disadvantage is a condensed employment of familiarity for elements from unitized related to non-unitized conditions. The benefits-only account proposes that the representations of each item in a pair, as well as the unitized gestalt are all available at retrieval. No costs are sustained when remembering the component items. Presently, there are limited studies and a lack of well-defined behavioral evidence in regard to these conflicting accounts of unitization. Pilgrim, Murray, and Donaldson (2012) question in their study whether the benefits of unitization at encoding also comes with a cost. They turned to using neural data in their experiment to differentiate between the two accounts of unitization, by observing the latent costs in the retrieval of single words. They manipulated unitization during encoding of word pairs; integration of items was encouraged or discouraged. Event related potentials (ERPs) from a scalp electroencephalogram (EEG) were used to index recollection and familiarity at retrieval. ERPs are one of the most potent techniques of dissociating the comparative influences of these processes to recollection (Donaldson & Curran, 2007). Studies of recognition memory for words show two temporally and topographically definite ERP effects that are proposed to expose recollection and familiarity. The early bilateral frontal old-new effect and the later left parietal old-new effect (Rugg & Curran, 2007) . To gage the impact of familiarity and recollection to retrieval, during recognition memory they recorded ERPs. Participants were shown and requested to evaluate whether single words were studied (old) or unstudied (new). They hypothesized that the single items of the unitized representation would not be as available at retrieval as elements encoded under non-unitized conditions. The data exposed selective declines in the neural relationships between familiarity and individual words initially encoded in unitized word pairs in comparison with non-unitized word pairs. In conclusion, Pilgrim et al.,( 2012, p 1671) state The finding reveals a MEMORY ENCODING STRATEGIES
11 measurable cost of unitization, suggesting that the nature of to-be-remembered stimuli is critical in determining whether familiarity contributed to episodic memory. Again, they stipulate that more research is needed into the underlying mechanisms of unitization, specifically in regard to the benefits and costs account. Current findings are lacking in regard to questions such as, is the specific encoding task critical? Are there levels of unitization, or is it an all or nothing mechanism? Are the depictions of individual elements purposefully inhibited or not as intensely activated as the integrated representation? It seems more comparisons across the array of encoding conditions that encourage stimuli to be processed as an integrated whole are necessary. This will ultimately improve our understanding in how to best empower familiarity to support retrieval. Which in turn, will inevitably enable improvements in memory training or rehabilitation for the aging population. Socioemotional Selectivity Theory Socioemotional selectivity theory (SST) postulates that people emphasize and value more emotionally significant goals as they grow old, and endow more social and cognitive resources in acquiring them (Laura L Carstensen, Isaacowitz, & Charles, 1999). This swing in motivation concerning emotional goals instigates emotion regulation or control over emotions that are expressed and experienced. Goal motivation, memory and attention for emotional material are forecast to fluctuate by age. Socioemotional selectivity theory suggests goals are established in time-based contexts. In youth, time is perceived as expansive and the focus is on the future. Time and energy are invested in information acquisition, novelty and horizon expansion. As people age they perceive constraints on their time and more direction is placed upon emotionally meaningful relationships and connections within the present (Laura L. Carstensen & Mikels, 2005). See Figure 3.
MEMORY ENCODING STRATEGIES
12 Hashtroudi, Johnson, and Chrosniak (1990) reported that older people, in memory studies for imagined and real events recalled more information about their feelings and reflections than about contextual and perceptual details. Despite the classically evidenced age-related insufficiencies in source memory, in a study by Rahhal, May, and Hasher (2002) older adults performed better when the information to be remembered was about significant emotional characteristics of people as opposed to questions regarding the gender of a person. The accumulating empirical evidence that older adults control emotional experience better is growing, yet understanding the processes by which this is achieved is deficient.
Figure 3. Idealized Model of Socioemotional Selectivity Theorys Conception of the Salience of Two Classes of Social Motives Across the Life span.
Figure 3. From The Social Context of Emotion by Laura L Carstensen, Gross, and Fung (1997), Annual Review of Geriatrics and Gerontology, 17, p 331.
The positivity effect The positivity effect refers to an age-related rise in the preference for positive instead of negative information in memory and attention (Laura L. Carstensen & Mikels, 2005). This was first considered within the framework of SST, as older adults are more motivated by goals that relate to emotional fulfillment, SST predicts a processing shift towards positive material later in life. A meta-analysis by Reed, Chan, and Mikels (2014) of MEMORY ENCODING STRATEGIES
13 100 studies of the positivity effect (N=7,129), found the effect reliable. Analyses implied that older adults revealed a significant processing inclination toward positive (vs. negative) information; the opposite pattern is shown in younger adults. A study by Charles, Mather, and Carstensen (2003) examined the hypothesis that memory for positive and negative images would systematically change with age, older adults would perform better than younger on memory for positive stimuli. They anticipated age differences would be more noticeable on the recall than recognition task as it requires more self-directed processing that may be more persuaded by current goals and motivations. Participants represented three age groups: young (18-29), middle-aged (41-53) and older adults (65-80) to examine age trajectories across adulthood. They viewed 32 sequential images, at 2-s intervals in random order on a computer screen, 16 neutral and 16 emotional 8 positive and 8 negative. Within each of the emotional valence groups, half were scenes of people and half were animals, nature scenes or inanimate objects. They were chosen from the International Affective Picture System (Ito, Cacioppo, & Lang, 1998), a set of pictures where there are normative emotional valence ratings for each image, on a Likert-type rating scale ranging from (1)-the most negative to (9)- the most positive. After a distractor task the subjects were asked to remember as many as possible and then to identify formerly shown pictures from a set of new and old ones. Data was analyzed using a repeated measures general linear model, with emotional valence of the picture (i.e., positive, negative or neutral) as the within-subject factor and age group as the between-subject factor. Results are illustrated in Figure 4.
MEMORY ENCODING STRATEGIES
14 Figure 4.
Figure 4. Average number of positive, negative and neutral pictures recalled ,study 1. From Aging and Emotional Memory: The Forgettable Nature of Negative Images for Older Adults by Charles, Mather & Cartensen (2003), Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132(2), 310-324. doi: 10.1037/0096- 3445.132.2.310
On the recall task in the study by Charles et al., (2003), middle-aged and older adults recollected more positive pictures than negative ones, however the younger group recalled approximately equal quantities of negative and positive pictures. They suggest motivational age-related shifts, as implied by SST and the positivity effect to have contributed to these findings. More research is needed to examine encoding of emotional valence within the neurophysiological and behavioral domains, similar to a study done by Mather et al. (2004). They used a set of positive, negative or neutral images in a standard recall task presented on a computer screen; which were repeated again to the same older/younger participants but in which event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging was used to investigate activation in the amygdala while viewing the pictures. The results revealed significantly greater amygdala activation in the older group for positive over negative stimuli. There is still debate over the robustness of the positivity effect, with many researchers calling for future investigations needed to extricate the weight of positive valence compared MEMORY ENCODING STRATEGIES
15 to other elements (i.e. semantic, arousal level, perceptual) (Tomaszczyk & Fernandes, 2013). There are various studies with contrary findings, such as by Gruhn, Smith, and Baltes (2005) who found no age-related emotion priority processing in regard to homogenous single valence and heterogeneous- mixed valence, emotionally toned word lists. If memory for emotional information does remain more intact, the SST framework may have relevance in regard to ways to present material so that older adults encode, process and retrieve it more efficiently. Conclusion We began this paper observing the dual-processing models and the encoding strategy of unitization, with findings from numerous studies showing this to be an effective way to provide environmental support during encoding for older adults. The review of the Bastin et al., (2013) data revealed that integrating the item and colour to form a new, singular representation boosted recall in the older group. Notwithstanding the clear evidence that these strategies improve memory tasks performed in a laboratory setting, further research is needed into the affordability of strategy use within a generalizable everyday context. The presentation format of information to be remembered seems to make strategy use either more or less affordable and older adults appear to be quite sensitive to such manipulations. As seen in the Pilgrim, Murray and Donaldson (2012) study, neural data revealed a retrieval cost in regard to the individual items before unitization. We then considered the positivity effect, which is linked to sociemotional selectivity theory and its compensatory influence on age-related recollection decline. Memory for emotional stimulus appears to identify as a preserved area of functioning. Data reviewed from neurophysiological and behavioural studies revealed significantly better recall of positive imagery by older adults. Given this preservation and motivational maintenance of emotional working memory, aging adults may encode and process information more MEMORY ENCODING STRATEGIES
16 effectively if presented in a positive way. This could be beneficial in regard to presenting health care messages; yet it could also result in less adequate judgments made if decisions require negative and positive options. Additional research is needed into cross-cultural differences to positivity, with non-Western samples appearing in very few studies. More consistent and selective reporting of measures of background cognitive ability would mean being able to better examine these as moderators of the positivity effect. The future of aging research in regard to memory appears to be extending beyond documenting preservation and decline as individual trajectories, and identifying ways both processes work in symbiosis. With the demographics of many countries moving towards an expansion in the 65 years plus age group, more memory training and education interventions will need to be developed and administered. Improvements in educating older adults, with the delivery of factual information about aging and memory; will instill positive beliefs about control over memory. By combining theoretically based strategy support and educational information, it is probable that older adults would experience improved objective memory performance. To conclude, with a pertinent quote from The Milk Train Doesnt stop Here Anymore by Tennessee Williams : Life is all memory except for the one present moment that goes by so quick you can hardly catch it going.
MEMORY ENCODING STRATEGIES
17
References
Aggleton, J., & Shaw, C. (1996). Amnesia and recognition memory: A re-analysis of psychometric data. Neuropsychologia, 34(1), 51-62. Bastin, C., Diana, R. A., Simon, J., Collette, F., Yonelinas, A. P., & Salmon, E. (2013). Associative memory in aging: The effect of unitization on source memory. Psychology and Aging, 28(1), 275-283. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0031566 Boywitt, C. D., & Meiser, T. (2012). Bound context features are integrated at encoding. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove), 65(8), 1484-1501. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2012.656668 Carstensen, L. L., Gross, J. J., & Fung, H. H. (1997). The social context of emotional experience. Annual review of gerontology and geriatrics, 17, 325-352. Carstensen, L. L., Isaacowitz, D. M., & Charles, S. T. (1999). Taking time seriously: A theory of socioemotional selectivity. American Psychologist, 54(3), 165. Carstensen, L. L., & Mikels, J. A. (2005). At the Intersection of Emotion and Cognition: Aging and the Positivity Effect. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(3), 117-121. doi: 10.2307/20183003 Charles, S. T., Mather, M., & Carstensen, L. L. (2003). Aging and emotional memory: The forgettable nature of negative images for older adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132(2), 310-324. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.132.2.310 Chen, T., & Naveh-Benjamin, M. (2012). Assessing the associative deficit of older adults in long-term and short-term/working memory. Psychology and Aging, 27(3), 666-682. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0026943 Curran, T. (2000). Brain potentials of recollection and familiarity. Memory & Cognition, 28(6), 923-938. MEMORY ENCODING STRATEGIES
18 Danckert, S. L., & Craik, F. I. M. (2013). Does aging affect recall more than recognition memory? Psychology and Aging, 28(4), 902-909. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0033263 Daselaar, S. M., Fleck, M. S., Dobbins, I. G., Madden, D. J., & Cabeza, R. (2006). Effects of healthy aging on hippocampal and rhinal memory functions: an event-related fMRI study. Cerebral Cortex, 16(12), 1771-1782. Diana, R. A., Yonelinas, A. P., & Ranganath, C. (2010). Medial temporal lobe activity during source retrieval reflects information type, not memory strength. Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 22(8), 1808-1818. Donaldson, D., & Curran, T. (2007). Potential (ERP) studies of recognition memory for faces. Neuroimage, 36(2), 488-489. Giovanello, K. S., & Schacter, D. L. (2012). Reduced specificity of hippocampal and posterior ventrolateral prefrontal activity during relational retrieval in normal aging. Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 24(1), 159-170. Gruhn, D., Smith, J., & Baltes, P. B. (2005). No aging bias favoring memory for positive material: evidence from a heterogeneity-homogeneity list paradigm using emotionally toned words. Psychol Aging, 20(4), 579-588. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.20.4.579 Hashtroudi, S., Johnson, M. K., & Chrosniak, L. D. (1990). Aging and qualitative characteristics of memories for perceived and imagined complex events. Psychology and Aging, 5(1), 119. Hertzog, C., Kramer, A. F., Wilson, R. S., & Lindenberger, U. (2008). Enrichment Effects on Adult Cognitive Development Can the Functional Capacity of Older Adults Be Preserved and Enhanced? Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 9(1), 1-65. MEMORY ENCODING STRATEGIES
19 Hintzman, D. L., Caulton, D. A., & Levitin, D. J. (1998). Retrieval dynamics in recognition and list discrimination: Further evidence of separate processes of familiarity and recall. Memory & Cognition, 26(3), 449-462. Ito, T. A., Cacioppo, J. T., & Lang, P. J. (1998). Eliciting affect using the International Affective Picture System: Trajectories through evaluative space. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24(8), 855-879. Jager, T., Mecklinger, A., & Kliegel, M. (2010). Associative recognition memory for faces: more pronounced age-related impairments in binding intra- than inter-item associations. Exp Aging Res, 36(2), 123-139. doi: 10.1080/03610731003613391 Java, R. I. (1996). Effects of age on state of awareness following implicit and explicit word- association tasks. Psychology and Aging, 11(1), 108. Kroll, N. E., Yonelinas, A. P., Dobbins, I. G., & Frederick, C. M. (2002). Separating sensitivity from response bias: implications of comparisons of yes-no and forced- choice tests for models and measures of recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131(2), 241. Luo, L., Hendriks, T., & Craik, F. I. (2007). Age differences in recollection: three patterns of enhanced encoding. Psychol Aging, 22(2), 269-280. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.22.2.269 Mandler, G. (1980). Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence. Psychological review, 87(3), 252. Mather, M., Canli, T., English, T., Whitfield, S., Wais, P., Ochsner, K., . . . Carstensen, L. L. (2004). Amygdala responses to emotionally valenced stimuli in older and younger adults. Psychological Science, 15(4), 259-263. Matzen, L. E., & Benjamin, A. S. (2013). Older and wiser: Older adults episodic word memory benefits from sentence study contexts. Psychology and Aging, 28(3), 754- 767. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0032945 MEMORY ENCODING STRATEGIES
20 Murray, B. D., & Kensinger, E. A. (2013). Age-related changes in associative memory for emotional and nonemotional integrative representations. Psychology and Aging, 28(4), 969-983. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0034443 Naveh-Benjamin, M., Brav, T. K., & Levy, O. (2007). The associative memory deficit of older adults: The role of strategy utilization. Psychology and Aging, 22(1), 202-208. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.22.1.202 Old, S. R., & Naveh-Benjamin, M. (2008). Differential effects of age on item and associative measures of memory: a meta-analysis. Psychology and Aging, 23(1), 104. Park, D. (2012). Cognitive aging: A primer: Psychology Press. Pilgrim, L. K., Murray, J. G., & Donaldson, D. I. (2012). Characterizing episodic memory retrieval: electrophysiological evidence for diminished familiarity following unitization. Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 24(8), 1671-1681. Quamme, J. R., Frederick, C., Kroll, N. E., Yonelinas, A. P., & Dobbins, I. G. (2002). Recognition memory for source and occurrence: The importance of recollection. Memory & Cognition, 30(6), 893-907. Rahhal, T. A., May, C. P., & Hasher, L. (2002). Truth and character: Sources that older adults can remember. Psychological Science, 13(2), 101-105. Ranganath, C. (2010). Binding Items and Contexts: The Cognitive Neuroscience of Episodic Memory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19(3), 131-137. doi: 10.1177/0963721410368805 Reed, A. E., Chan, L., & Mikels, J. A. (2014). Meta-analysis of the age-related positivity effect: age differences in preferences for positive over negative information. Psychol Aging, 29(1), 1-15. doi: 10.1037/a0035194 Rugg, M. D., & Curran, T. (2007). Event-related potentials and recognition memory. Trends in cognitive sciences, 11(6), 251-257. MEMORY ENCODING STRATEGIES
21 Tomaszczyk, J. C., & Fernandes, M. A. (2013). A positivity effect in older adults' memorability judgments of pictures. Exp Aging Res, 39(3), 254-274. doi: 10.1080/0361073X.2013.779178 Troyer, A. K., D'Souza, N. A., Vandermorris, S., & Murphy, K. J. (2011). Age-related differences in associative memory depend on the types of associations that are formed. Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn, 18(3), 340-352. doi: 10.1080/13825585.2011.553273 Verhaeghen, P., Marcoen, A., & Goossens, L. (1992). Improving memory performance in the aged through mnemonic training: A meta-analytic study. Psychology and Aging, 7(2), 242-251. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.7.2.242 Wegesin, D. J., Jacobs, D. M., Zubin, N. R., Ventura, P. R., & Stern, Y. (2000). Source Memory and Encoding Strategy in Normal Aging. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology (Neuropsychology, Development and Cognition: Section A), 22(4), 455-464. doi: 10.1076/1380-3395(200008)22:4;1-0;ft455 Yonelinas, A. P. (1999). The contribution of recollection and familiarity to recognition and source-memory judgments: A formal dual-process model and an analysis of receiver operating characterstics. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25(6), 1415. Yonelinas, A. P. (2002). The Nature of Recollection and Familiarity: A Review of 30 Years of Research. Journal of Memory and Language, 46(3), 441-517. doi: 10.1006/jmla.2002.2864