FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Troubling Massachusetts Foreclosure Case Continues to

Raise Questions Regarding Integrity of the System

Boston, MA, August 22, 2014 After submitting a letter to MA Inspector General - Glenn Cunha last
Friday, requesting to review and monitor the 3 year wrongful foreclosure case involving US Bank,
Wells Fargo, and wrongfully foreclosed homeowner - Mohan A. Harihar, troubling concerns continue to
surface.

The latest concerns come as the overwhelming (& still growing) amount of supporting civil and criminal
information/evidence is allowing Mr. Harihar to file for new trial; validation/affirmation of the information
on file with the Court (or never provided by the Appellees
1
) is necessary to ensure accuracy and fact-
based information. The MA Appeals Court agreed, allowing Mr. Harihar to file appropriate motion(s) to
affirm/validate information. A motion was then submitted requesting the validation of specific, and very
basic validation requests including: signatures on file, Chain of Title, and ensuring the
integrity/availability of Discovery evidence prior to filing for new trial.
2


The Court then changed direction, and denied the motion, without cause. Mr. Harihar submitted
a request to clarify the decision. The Court has now DENIED that request, refusing to clarify
their decision. This troubling concern (refusing to clarify a decision) has occurred throughout the
history of this matter, not only in the MA Appeals Court, but also the Northeast Housing Court, and
also the Middlesex Superior Court. The interpreted message it sends to wrongfully foreclosed
homeowners, and to the public, is one which questions the integrity of the Judicial system; supporting
the feared Too Big to Fail mentality, and re-affirms the necessity to address this entire matter with the
MA Inspector General, and transfer to Federal Court. Mr. Harihar is now preparing an appeal to the
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court for Further Appellate Review (FAR), so that the VALIDATION
of information and evidence can proceed.

As this growing storyline continues to gain considerable National and Global attention through social
media, there is now a call for Massachusetts leaders to also address this issue. The tremendous
concerns surrounding 65,000 wrongful foreclosures within the Commonwealth include the timeline
allowing homeowners to file suit against Lenders responsible for referenced misconduct.
3
If the Court
refuses to allow information to be validated, it will make no difference if the timeline allowed to
file suit is 20 years, or 1 year. The interpreted message sent to MA homeowners is you will
not be allowed to succeed.

A follow-up letter to Inspector General Cunha expressing these latest concerns has now been sent.

1
Appellees in this case are: US Bank NA, Wells Fargo NA, Harmon Law Offices PC, and the Securitized
Mortgage Trust CMLTI 2006-AR1. The Appellant is Mohan A. Harihar.
2
Scroll down to see the Motion requesting Clarification, followed by the DENIAL by the MA Appeals Court,
and follow-up letter to MA Inspector General Glenn Cunha.
3
Concerns referenced in Senate Bill 1987, recently rejected by Governor Deval Patrick.
2
Understanding this matter is still in active litigation, the request made to the Inspector Generals Office
is to monitor and review the details of this matter, as a corrective path continues to be sought within
the MA Court system.

Pending the SJCs Further Appellate Review, preparations are additionally being made to file a petition
with the US Supreme Court Writ of Certiorari and/or a petition to Congress requesting transfer of
this entire matter to Federal Court, as 14
th
Amendment infractions to Due process and Equal
Protection Rights of Mr. Harihar are seemingly being ignored.

While hand-delivering a copy of the Inspector General Letter in-person to MA Congresswoman Niki
Tsongas office last Friday, a request for potential assistance with a Congressional petition was
discussed.

Additional parties copied on the follow-up letter sent to the Inspector General include: Vice President
Biden, Governor Deval Patrick (MA), US Senator Elizabeth Warren (MA), US Senator Ed Markey
(MA), Congresswoman Niki Tsongas (MA), Attorney General Martha Coakley (MA), Assistant Deputy
Director Timothy Sheehan Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), the US Attorneys office
and the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU).


For Further Media Information Contact : Mohan A. Harihar
Email: mo.harihar@gmail.com
Phone: 617.921.2526 (Mobile)

Follow on Twitter:
Mohan Harihar@Mo_Harihar






























3
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS

MIDDLESEX APPEALS COURT OF
THE COMMONWEALTH
DOCKET NO: 2013P1829

MOHAN A. HARIHAR

Appellant

vs.

US BANK NA,
WELLS FARGO NA,
HARMON LAW OFFICES PC, et al.

Appellees


MOTION - APPELLANT REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATION AND
RECONSIDERATION

The Appellant, Mohan A. Harihar, respectfully submits to the
Court this request for an itemized Clarification of the Courts
August 7, 2014 decision, denying the Appellants request for
validation.

After receiving the 7/24/2014 decision by this Court granting
the Appellant permission to file a motion(s) seeking
affirmative relief, it is unclear as to why a motion requesting
validation of information filed with the Court (or not
provided) has now been denied.

The amount of information in question is considerable. Without
validation, a corrective path to this matter within this
Commonwealth is in doubt. It is feared that the historical
concerns experienced in the Lower Court(s), and as detailed in
the Appellant Brief/Reply Brief, will be repeated if validation
is not provided beforehand.

Itemized clarification is now respectfully requested for the
following:

1. Is the Court stating that the decision(s) by Appellee
Harmon Law Offices PC, not to file ANY Appellate Brief or
opposition in this matter, does not create a clear
4
disconnect with information provided by Appellees US
Bank NA and Wells Fargo NA? Please clarify.

2. Please clarify the decision not to validate and ensure the
availability and integrity of critical Discovery evidence.
Specifically, the recorded conversations during the 22-
month loan modification process, between the Appellee -
Wells Fargo NA (Mortgage Servicer) and the Appellant
Mohan A. Harihar, which are believed to support (at
minimum) Deceptive Practices (G.L. c. 93A, 2)by the
Appellee(s). The purpose of the Order is to additionally
validate if these recordings still exist or if they have
been illegally tampered with, destroyed, lost, etc

3. Please clarify the decision denying the validation of
foreclosure signatures on file.

4. Please clarify the decision to deny validating Chain of
Title. Additionally, please clarify how foreclosure and
eviction decisions have been allowed to stand, when
constant requests to validate Chain of Title and
Signatures on file are either ignored or denied.

5. Please clarify the decision to deny validating the
irrefutable connection of this matter to the MA Attorney
Generals - 3+ year ongoing investigation of Appellee
Harmon Law Offices PC, for wrongful foreclosure and
eviction practices.

6. Please clarify the decision denying the validation of
unsupported claims of harassment, as stated by the
Appellees.

7. Please clarify the decision denying the validation of
irrefutable 14
th
Amendment infractions pertaining to Due
Process and Equal Protection Rights of the Appellant,
Mohan A. Harihar.

8. Please provide clarification for denying the Appellants
request for a special prosecutor to both civil and
criminal actions related to the referenced foreclosure,
particularly with the recently discovered concerns of
Collusion and irrefutable conflict involving the Appellees
retained Counsel Nelson Mullins LLP, the MA Attorney
Generals Office and the US Attorneys Office.

5
9. Please provide clarification for denying the completion of
the VALIDATION QUESTIONNAIRE, previously provided to the
Appellees (Wells Fargo NA and US Bank NA), who have
historically refused to answer?

10. Please provide clarification for denying an order
requesting the assistance from the Internal Revenue
Service (IRS), and also the Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC), particularly with complex validation
concerns surrounding the associated Securitized Mortgage
Trust, CMLTI 2006-AR1.

11. Please provide clarification denying the appointment
of a special prosecutor to address the number of concerns
(on multiple levels), involving the infringement of
intellectual property of the Appellant, and increased risk
to a project designed to assist the US and overall global
economic recovery, as detailed in the filed Appellant
Brief to Docket 2013-P-1829.

12. Please clarify the decision denying this Appellant to
rightfully return to his home, thus correcting what is an
irrefutable case of WRONGFUL DISPLACEMENT.


There are an estimated 65,000 Wrongful Foreclosures which exist
in this Commonwealth alone, and over 4.2M across this Nation in
just the measured timeframe of this Foreclosure Crisis. This
Foreclosure/Financial Crisis, which has ruined so many lives
including this Appellants and has critically harmed this
Nations economy, is realized by everyone. State and Federal
Legislators continue to search for ways which will repair the
damage caused by these Appellees and others responsible for
this Crisis thus far unsuccessfully.

While it seems clear, that wrongfully foreclosed homeowners
should be able to file suit in effort to receive appropriate
compensation for harm and damages incurred, this matter has
over time evolved, and become an example of great concern;
whether or not affected homeowners in this Commonwealth have
ANY chance to rightfully receive appropriate and fair
compensation, to repair damages caused and to move forward in
rebuilding their lives.

What I have been through in this legal and overall ordeal no
one person or family should ever have to experience. For now
over 3 years, I have represented myself in this matter out of
6
financial necessity; I have forced the withdrawal of the
initially retained Law firm to Appellee US Bank NA, who is
also an Appellee in this matter and is under investigation by
the MA Attorney General
4
; I have provided supporting evidence
and information in every Court evidence supporting not only
the civil infractions stated, but also criminal infractions of
(at minimum) - perjury, deceptive practices including FRAUD,
fraudulent concealment/ misrepresentation, and aiding and
abetting fraud. Ive also referenced numerous supporting Court
cases, some involving not only the same issues, but the same
Appellees and even retained counsel.

While addressing these Legal challenges on my own, I have also
created a solution to this crisis a framework which addresses
most, if not all variables involved, while repairing damage to
the homeowner, assisting both National and Global Economic
recovery, and without the need for added legislation or one tax
dollar to implement. It has been reviewed or presented to
parties including: the Deputy Chief Counsel of the House
Finance Committee, the Senior Economic Advisor to a sitting US
Senator, two (2) Attorneys General including the AG Office of
this Commonwealth, a Congressional office, the Chairman of a
Nationally ranked Strategic Communications firm, two (2) state
Senators, and it has been sent to the Vice President of these
United States at his request. Not one (1) of these parties
has found flaw with this plan.

Ive been respectful to this and every Court, followed the law,
and have clearly gone over and above, perhaps more so than any
individual in this Commonwealth or Country to not only prove
this case, but to also provide a solution to help ALL parties
affected.

If these collective efforts are unsuccessful in even the
validation of information, what is the chance of this, or any
homeowner, successfully recovering ANY appropriate amount for
damages incurred by the harm caused? What precedent does it
set, and what message does it send to homeowners throughout
this Commonwealth and across this Nation?

These concerns reinforce those already articulated in the
Appellants Brief, Reply Brief, etc, and which now include
clear concerns of collusion and irrefutable conflict, as
previously stated. This Appellant maintains the intention to
hold parties legally accountable for the harm and accruing

4
Appellee Harmon Law Offices PC
7
damages associated in this matter; to assist the additional
4.2M parties similarly affected in this crisis; and to assist
the DOJ in providing a path for future prosecution.

The Appellant respectfully requests that reconsideration be
given in effort to validate/affirm information related to this
matter and on file with this Court(s), so that a corrective
path can finally be established within this Commonwealth, and a
rebuilding process for this homeowner can begin.

Due to the increasing concerns stated within this Motion,
Appellant Brief, Reply Brief, etc a request to monitor this
entire matter is being made to the Massachusetts Office of the
Inspector General, and will include a copy of this Motion,
along with additional supporting documents, already on file
with the Court(s). Copies of this Motion are additionally sent
to the following parties: Vice President Biden, MA Governor
Deval Patrick, US Senator Elizabeth Warren (MA), US Senator Ed
Markey (MA), Congresswoman Nikki Tsongas (MA), Attorney General
Martha Coakley (MA), Assistant Deputy Director Timothy Sheehan
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), the US
Attorneys office and the American Civil Liberties Union
(ACLU).

Forthcoming decisions will determine if it becomes necessary to
file petition requesting a Writ of Certiorari, or if a
petition to Congress for assistance in transferring this matter
to Federal Court is deemed necessary.

It remains my sincere hope that a corrective path to this
matter can still be achieved within this Commonwealth.

Thank you for your attention to this matter.






Respectfully submitted,



Mohan A. Harihar



8

August 21, 2014

VIA HAND DELIVERY
Office of the Inspector General
John W. McCormack State Office Building
One Ashburton Place, Room 1311
Boston, MA 02108

RE: New Concerns Related to MA Foreclosure & Ongoing Litigation


Dear Inspector General Cunha:
As follow-up to the letter hand delivered to your office last Friday, August 15, 2014, an
additional concern has now emerged, re-affirming the necessity to inform the Office of the
Inspector General in this matter.
On Monday, August 18, 2014, and in response to the Motion filed last Friday, August 15,
2014 with the Massachusetts Appeals Court requesting the Clarification of a Decision, the
Court has DENIED this request to clarify their decision. This represents a common theme
throughout the history of this matter, as detailed in the Appellant Brief/Reply Brief to the
associated Docket No. 2013-P-1829. Decisions made without cause, and requests to clarify
these decisions are subsequently denied. It re-affirms the clear concerns of a Too Big to Fail
mentality, thus questioning the Integrity of the Judicial system in this Commonwealth.
Based on the current path, the interpreted message sent to this Appellant, as well as 65,000
wrongfully foreclosed homeowners throughout this Commonwealth appears clear no matter
how much evidence or information there is supporting your claim, you will not be allowed to
succeed in recouping compensation for the damage caused or in holding responsible parties
accountable for their misconduct.
Mohan A. Harihar
168 Parkview Avenue
Lowell, MA 01852
617.921.2526 (Mobile)
9
Understanding this matter is still in active litigation, the request made to the Inspector
Generals Office is to monitor and review the details of this matter, as a corrective path
continues to be sought within the MA Court system.
For additional questions regarding this matter, I can be reached directly via cell phone
617.921.2526.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Sincerely,
Mohan A. Harihar

Cc: Vice President Joe Biden
Governor Deval Patrick (MA)
US Senator Elizabeth Warren (MA)
US Senator Ed Markey (MA)
Congresswoman Niki Tsongas (MA)
Attorney General Martha Coakley (MA)
Assistant Deputy Director Timothy Sheehan (CFPB)
Christina Sterling, Spokesperson, DOJ (MA)
Susan Herman (President, ACLU)