Book is of interest as further development of the series, but in the end I was disappointed. New terms and concepts are introduced that are not foreshadowed in the earlier books. The water conference greatly contributed to a definition of the crisis.
Original Description:
Original Title
Futures Volume 9 Issue 3 1977 [Doi 10.1016%2F0016-3287%2877%2990040-4] André Van Dam -- Defining Water Management for the 1980s - The United Nations Water Conference, Mar Del Plata, Argentina, March 1977
Book is of interest as further development of the series, but in the end I was disappointed. New terms and concepts are introduced that are not foreshadowed in the earlier books. The water conference greatly contributed to a definition of the crisis.
Book is of interest as further development of the series, but in the end I was disappointed. New terms and concepts are introduced that are not foreshadowed in the earlier books. The water conference greatly contributed to a definition of the crisis.
development of the series, but in the end I was disappointed. It is not well- integrated; the philosophical quotes that begin each chapter on the nature of religion and time, are never re- flected in the actual plot. How Pauls religion has affected the social struc- tures of Dune or the empire is not clear, nor was I ever able to grasp what the childrens ability to foresee/ alter the future enables them to do in the present and why. New terms and concepts are introduced that are not foreshadowed in the earlier books, causing some confusion, and the ending (archetypal Superman) is sexist to boot. So, if youve started the trilogy, finish it with this book; otherwise, read Briton. CONFERENCES Defining water management for the 1980s The United Nations Water Con- ference, Mar de1 Plats, Argentina, March 1977 WATER management will assume a new role in the 198Os, if only to avoid an impending water crisis. But how will this crisis manifest itself? The water conference greatly contributed to a definition of the crisis. Very briefly, there are four basic problems which have been ignored for too long, if only because water seemed abundant for ever and was very cheap: l the worlds water is highly unevenly distributed between areas, seasons and years, l common ownership of river basins and lakes foments political and other conflicts, 0 water contamination remains largely unchecked, and, last but not least, l only a small portion of the worlds water resources can be used at present. The water supply The worlds total water stock is guessti- mated at 1.4 billion km3. More than 97% of this is seawater which cannot yet be desalted on a large scale, eco- nomically. This leaves about 40 million km3 of surface water (mainly ice caps and glaciers) and groundwater. That limits the water supply to 8 million km3 of groundwater and 0.2 million km3 of surface water, mostly rivers, and lakes. However, much of the groundwater is beyond mans present exploitation as it lies at a depth of more than 800 metres. The usable stock is thus limited to 0.3 million km3 of groundwater and 0.2 million km3 of surface water. [One km3 equals 1 trillion ( 10i2) litre.] The limit of withdrawal is the rain and snow, the precipitation-the cru- cial stage of the cycle which starts with evaporation of the oceans, rivers, lakes and the land. This is a never ending cycle, natures one great desalination plant. The daily water cycle averages 1100 km3, of which 250 km3 fall on the land where man may use it. Except that about 70% of that precipitation never enters the streamflow. Before man can use it, it evaporates or is absorbed by plants and transpired through their leaves. The water cycle is more complex than pictured here, but it does imply that we face a limited water supply. The demand for water All the economic sectors need water: in most industrialised nations, energy FUTURES J une 1977 Conferences 251 and manufacturing industry now make the heaviest claim on water eg mining, building, primary metal plants, re- fineries, pulp and paper industry, chemical industry, and the food and beverage industries. One must distinguish between water consumption and water use. Industry uses generally the same water twice or even more frequently. The crux of the matter is not how much water industry uses, but rather what it uses the water for, how much it pays for it, and to what extent it contam~ates the water which it returns to the streamflow. At present, water is not an eco- nomic factor in industry. The average cost of water in the total plant cost varies from 0.1 o/ 0 to 1 loo/ &--and occa- sionally reaches 2.5%. Given the inevi- tably high cost of water management, one can expect fresh water to become more expensive. Taken as a whole, North American industry recycles water once, but some industries recycle water twice. The degree of recycling and reuse is rising every year (a ton of steel requires about 200 000 litre of water, a ton of paper 300 000 litre and a ton of syn- thetic rubber 2 000 000 litre). Currently, industrys most important competitors for water are energy and agriculture (it takes an average 10 litre of water to produce one kWh). Worldwide, agriculture uses three- quarters of all the water consumed. Irrigated land requires a million gallons of water per acre on an average (10 million Iitre per hectare)-but the high-yield miracle rice and corn use quite a lot more. In many countries it takes 10 litre of water for a kilo of springbeans, 10 000 litre for a dozen Iarge eggs, and 30 000 Iitre for a kiIo of prime beef. These quantities depend of course on a variety of factors, such as humidity, light, soil moisture, tempera- ture and wind. However, the water intake can average one hundred times the dry weight of a plant during one growing season. Vegetables use much more water than men or animaIs, because their throughput of water is tremendous. (One hectare of potatoes demands 4 million litre of water.) If, as is expected, the need for irriga- tion rises more sharply than the demand for energy and industrial goods then competition for water will be fierce in many parts of the world. Cooperation The heart of the matter at the con- ference was, obviously, the need to manage water judiciously by a com- prehensive cooperative system between nations as well as between users. While the technicians will be called upon to expand the available amount of surface water and groundwater, the private sector will be invited to cooperate with the public sector in water management. The cure-all for the water crisis is called water management, but it means different things to different people. At the water conference, the fo~owing facets of rational management were mostly discussed : o Improve the distribution of water, by constructing surface reservoirs, carry- ing water from surplus to deficit territories, and protecting the soil of natural watersheds. l Expand, in the same vein, the use of underground storage. a Enhance the efficiency in the use of water by recycling, and by reducing waste. l Ameliorate the quality of water by purifying sewage and keeping waste- waters away from river basins ancl lakes. l Expand the yield of water by desdlt- ing seawater, reduce losses in eva- poration, and modify the weather. Rational water management would require a global information system using communications satellites. The latter are to measure rain, and river gauges all over the world, computerise the results and provide the nations with FUTURES J une 1977 252 Conferences up to date information on the hydro- logical cycle. The system would chart river flows and levels by latitude and longitude. Eventually it would be used to measure groundwater levels, soil moisture, snow cover, atmospheric water vapour, lake levels, and salinity in estuaries. In the industrial sphere, it would imply the creation of closed circuit systems, whereby water circu- lates without risking contamination of lakes, streams and river basins. This would in addition reduce the absolute withdrawal of water from the hydro- logical cycle. Rational water management assumes a high degree of cooperation between countries and professions. Last but not least, it assumes that in view of the ever rising demand for water (6% per year, so far) and the constant volume of supply, the price of water will have to be commensurate with the usefulness of Western Europe in transition its application and the contamination of the process, end-, and by-products. Hitherto, water management has been the bailiwick of the public sector. The role of industry in water manage- ment has been almost nil. This may well explain why so little new technology has been developed in the area of water supply and distribution. Since industry was all but absent at the water conference, its future role in water management and cooperation remains to be defined. It could well be that a steep rise in the cost of water, advocated inter alia by the World Bank, will render industry sensitive to the challenge of water management, and will render the public authorities sensitive to a valuable contribution by industry. Andre van Darn Argentina International Symposium on Europes future: new initiatives and methods in managing change, London, 30-3 1 March 1977 This symposium, a follow-up to an earlier one,l brought together partici- pants whose governments were all under threat: eg being forced into coalitions by new political, social and economic conditions, or into devaluing the currency. The commonality of conditions, particularly the paradoxes, in European countries was readily established. For example there is in many countries an incompatibility between individuals desire to take initiatives and government unwilling- ness to reward resourcefulness and offer security to such individuals. Throughout the meeting a constant underlying theme was that Western Europe is however on the eve of major change. Participants endeavoured to characterise the changes and to suggest action points where change could also be catalysed. Most felt that initiatives would have to be taken at a nongovernmental, individual, and corporate level. As Terence Price (UK) pointed out, a basic problem in peacetime, where a major objective is the preservation of a pluralistic society, is that of establishing a consensus, of providing a vision. He suggested that the vision would come from the political and social institutions, especially if these were modelled along US lines. It was replied, first that US practices are inappropriate to the European con- text, and second that there is an initial need for thinkers and philosophers to point out the fundamental problems, ask the right questions, and provide the vision, before establishing the institutions. FUTURES J une 1977
Avi Hurvitz Leeor Gottlieb, Aaron Hornkohl, Emmanuel Mastéy A Concise Lexicon of Late Biblical Hebrew Linguistic Innovations in The Writings of The Second Temple Period PDF
(Multiphysics Modeling) Jochen Bundschuh, Mario César Suárez Arriaga-Introduction To The Numerical Modeling of Groundwater and Geothermal Systems - Fundamentals of Mass, Energy and Solute Transport in