Browse

Summary Dismissal
Board v. Torcita, 330
SCRA 153
(2000)Secretary of
Justice v. Lantion, G.R.
No. 139466, October
17, 2000People vs.
Estrada G.R. No.
130487 June 19,
2000Lim v. Court of
Appeals, G.R. 111397,
August 12,
2002Rodriguez v. Court
of Appeals, G.R.
134278, August 7,
2002Roxas v. Vasquez,
G.R. 114944, June 21,
2001
Exceptions to notice
and hearing
requirements
Philcomsat vs. Alcuaz,
180 SCRA 218
(1989)Suntay vs.
People, 101 Phil. 833
(1957)De Bisshop vs.
Galang, 8 SCRA 244
(1963)Var Orient
Shipping Co., Inc. vs.
Achacoso, 161 SCRA
232 (1988)
6. Administrative Due
Process
Ang Tibay vs. CIR, 69
Phil. 635
(1940)Montemayor vs.
Araneta University
Foundation, 77 SCRA
321 (1977)Meralco vs.
PSC, 11 SCRA 317
(1964)Ateneo vs. CA,
145 SCRA 100
(1986)Alcuaz vs.
PSBA, 161 SCRA 7
(1988)Non vs. Hon.
Dames, G.R. No.
89317, May 30, 1990
B. EQUAL
PROTECTIONPolitical
, Economic and Social
Equality
Art. XIII, Sec. 1 and 2
(social justice)Id., Sec.
3 (protection to
labor)Art. XII, Sec. 10
(nationalization of
business)Id., Sec. 2,
par. 2 (reservation of
marine resources)Art.
II, Sec. 11 (free access
to the courts)Art. VIII,
Sec. 5(5) (legal aid to
poor)Art. IX-C, Sec. 10
(protection of
candidates)Art. II, Sec.
26 (public service)Art.
II, Sec. 14 (equality of
women and men)
Sexual Discrimination
Phil. Association of
Service Exporters vs.
Drilon, 163 SCRA 386
(1988)
Taxation
Sison vs. Ancheta, 130
SCRA 654 (1984)
Administration of
Justice
People vs. Hernandez,
99 Phil. 515
(1956)People vs.
Isinain, 85 Phil. 648
(1950)Chavez v.
PCGG, G.R. 130716,
December 9,
1998Nunez vs.
Sandiganbayan, 111
SCRA 433
(1982)Lacson v.
Executive Secretary,
G.R. No. 128096,
January 20,
1999Soriano v. C.A.,
304 SCRA 231 (1999)
Public Policy
Unido vs. COMELEC,
104 SCRA 17
(1981)Ceniza vs.
COMELEC, 95 SCRA
763 (1980)PJA vs.
Prado, 227 SCRA 703
(1993)Olivarez v.
Sandiganbayan, 248
SCRA 700 (1995)Tiu v.
Court of Appeals, G.R.
No. 127410, January
20, 1999ISAE v.
Quisumbing, G.R. No.
128845, June 1,
2000PHILRECA
vs
. DILG, G.R. No.
143076. June 10, 2003
C. THE NON-
IMPAIRMENT
CLAUSE
Art. III, Sec. 10

1. Purpose2. When
impairment occurs3.
When allowed
Emergency Powers
Rutter vs. Esteban, 93
Phil. 68 (1953)
Zoning and Regulatory
Ordinances
Ortigas vs. Feati Bank,
94 SCRA 533
(1980)Villanueva vs.
Castaneda, 154 SCRA
142 (1987)Sangalang
vs. IAC, 168 SCRA 634
(1988)Ortigas & Co. v.
CA, G.R. No. 126102,
December 4, 2000
Labor Contracts
Abella vs. NLRC 152
SCRA 140 (1987)
Administrative
Regulations
Tiro vs. Hontanosas,
125 SCRA 697 (1983)
Rental Laws
Caleon vs. Agus
Development Corp.,
207 SCRA 748 (1992)
Tax Exemptions
Meralco v. Province of
Laguna, 306 SCRA 750
(1999)
D. ARRESTS,
SEARCHES AND
SEIZURES
Art. III, Sec. 2 and 3
1. Purpose and
Importance of the
guaranty
Alvero v. Dizon, 76
Phil 637 (1946)
2. To Whom Directed
People vs. Andre Marti,
193 SCRA 57 (1991)
3. Who May Invoke the
Right?
Bache and Co., vs.
Ruiz, 37 SCRA 323
(1971)Stonehill v.
Diokno, 20 SCRA 383
(1967)Zurcher vs.
Stanford Daily, 436 U.
S. 547 (1978)Wilson v.
Layne, 98-0083, May
24, 1999
4. Conditions for a valid
warranta) Existence of
Probable Cause
Burgos vs. Chief of
Staff, 133 SCRA 800
(1984)Chandler v.
Miller, April 15, 1997,
D-96-126People v.
Chua Ho San, 308
SCRA 432)
(1999)People v.
Molina, G.R. No.
133917, February 19,
2001Solid Triangle Sale
v. Sheriff, G.R. No.
144309 November 23,
2001People v.
Salanguit, G.R. 133254,
April 18, 2001
b) Personal
determination by judge
Amarga vs. Abbas, 98
Phil. 739 (1956)Sta.
Rosa Mining Co., vs.
Fiscal Zabala, 153
SCRA 367
(1987)People vs. Inting,
187 SCRA 785
(1990)Paderanga vs.
Drilon, G.R. 96080,
April 19, 1991Pita vs.
CA, 178 SCRA 362
(1987)Abdula v.
Guiani. 326 SCRA 1
(2000)
c) Examination of
witnesses
Pasion Vda. De Garcia
vs. Locsin, 65 Phil 68
(1938)Yee Sue Kuy vs.
Almeda, 70 Phil. 141,
(1940)Alvarez vs. CFI,
64 Phil. 33 (1937)Mata
vs. Bayona , 128 SCRA
388 (1984)
d) Particularity of
description

Olaes vs. People, 155
SCRA 486
(1987)Prudente vs.
Judge Dayrit, 180
SCRA 69 (1989)Chia
vs. Coll. of Customs,
177 SCRA 755
(1989)20th Century Fox
Film Corp. vs. CA, 164
SCRA 655
(1988)Nolasco vs. Cruz
Pano, 132 SCRA 152
(1985)PICOP v.
Asuncion, 307 SCRA
253) (1999)Yousef Al
Ghoul vs. C.A, GR
No.126859, September
4, 2001
4. Objects of Seizure
(Rule 126, Sec. 2)
5. Warrantless searches
(Rule 126, Sec. 12, Id.,
Sec. 4)
a) Valid Waiver
People vs. Omaweng,
213 SCRA 462
(1992)People v. Correa,
285 SCRA 679
(1998)People vs.
Ramos, G.R. 85401-02,
June 4, 1990People v.
Barros, 231 SCRA 557
(1994)Veroy vs.
Layague, 210 SCRA 97
(1992)People vs.
Damaso, 212 SCRA
457 (1992)Lopez vs.
Comm. Of Customs, 68
SCRA 320
(1975)Caballes v. Court
of Appeals, G.R. No.
136292, January 5,
2002People vs. Asis, et.
al., G.R. No. 142531,
October 15, 2002People
vs. Tudtud, et. al., G.R.
No. 144037, September
26, 2003
b) Incident to lawful
arrest
Rule 126, Section 12,
Rules of CourtChimel
vs. California, 395 U. S.
752 (1964)People vs. de
la Cruz, G.R. 83988,
April 18, 1990People v.
Kalubiran, 196 SCRA
645 (1991)People v.
Malmstedt, 198 SCRA
401 (1991)People v.
Cuenco, G.R. 126277,
November 16,
1988Espano v. Court of
Appeals, 288 SCRA
558 (1998)People vs.
Tangliben, 184 SCRA
220 (1990)People v.
Che Chun Ting, 328
SCRA 592
(2000)People vs.
Estrella, G.R. Nos.
138539-40, January 21,
2003People vs. Libnao,
et al., G.R. No. 136860,
January 20, 2003
c) Plain view doctrine
People v. Musa, 217
SCRA 597
(1993)Padilla v. CA,
269 SCRA 402
(1997)People v. Valdez,
G.R. No. 129296,
September 25,
2000Arizona v. Hicks,
480 U.S. 321
[1987]}People v.
Compacion, G.R. No.
124442, July 20, 2001
e) Enforcement of
fishing, customs and
immigration laws
Roldan vs. Area, 65
SCRA 320 (1975)Hizon
v. Court of Appeals,
265 SCRA 517
(1996)People v.
Gatward, 267 SCRA
785 (1997)People v.
Johnson, G.R. No.
138881, December 18,
2000People vs. Suzuki,
G.R. No. 120670,
October 23,
2003)Bureau of
Customs v. Ogarlo, 329
SCRA 289 (2000)
f) Stop and frisk
Terry vs. Ohio, 392 US
1 (1968)People v.
Solayao, 262 SCRA
255 (1996)

Manalili v. Court of
Appeals, G.R. No.
113447, October 7,
1997Malacat v. Court
of Appeals, 283 SCRA
159 (1997)Florida v.
J.L., 98-1993, March
28, 2000
g) Search of moving
vehicles
People v. Balingan, 241
SCRA 277
(1995)Asuncion v.
Court of Appeals, G.R.
125959, February 1,
1999Papa vs. Mago, 22
SCRA 857
(1968)People vs. CFI of
Rizal, 101 SCRA 86
(1980)Whren v. United
States, 95-5841,
January 10,
1996Arkansas v.
Sullivan, 00-00262,
May 29, 2001
h) Emergency
circumstances
People vs. De Gracia
233 SCRA 716 (1994)
i) Checkpoints
Gen. De Villa vs.
Valmonte G.R. No.
83988 (May 24,
1990)Aniag vs.
Comelec, 237 SCRA
424 (1994)People v.
Usana, 323 SCRA 754
(2000)
j) Inspection of
buildings
Camara vs. Municipal
Court, 387 U. S. 523
(1967)
5. Warrantless arrests
Rule 113, Sec. 5Art.
125, Revised Penal
Code
Rebellion as Continuing
Offense
Umil vs. Ramos, G. R.
81567, July 9, 1990
Committed in the
Presence of Police
Officers
People v. Sucro, 195
SCRA 388
(1991)People V. Doria,
301 SCRA 668)
(1999)People v. Luisito
Go, G.R. No. 116001,
March 14, 2001People
v. De Guzman, GR No.
117952-53, February
14, 2001
Personal Knowledge of
the Offense
People vs. Gerente, 219
SCRA 756
(1993)People v. Sinoc,
275 SCRA 357
(1997)People v. Baula,
G.R. No. 132671,
November 15,
2000People v.
Cubcubin, G.R. No.
136267, July 10, 2001
Time of Arrest
People vs. Rodrigueza,
205 SCRA 791
(1992)Go vs. Court of
Appeals, 206 SCRA
586 (1992)People v.
Calimlim, G.R. No.
123980, August 30.
2001
Marked Money
People vs. Enrile, 222
SCRA 586 (1993)
Lack of Urgency
People v. Pasudag, G.R.
No. 128822, May 4,
2001People vs.
Aminnudin, 163 SCRA
402 (1988)
Effect of Entry of Plea
People v. Plana G.R.
No. 128285, November
27, 2001
Validity of Conviction
People v. Conde, G.R.
No. 113269, April 10,
2001
E. PRIVACY OF
COMMUNICATION &
CORRESPONDENCE
R.A. No. 4200 (Anti-
Wire Tapping Law)
(1965) Arts, 290, 291,
292 and 299. Revised
Penal Code.
Gaanan vs. IAC, 145
SCRA 113 (1986)

Katz vs. U.S., 389 U.S.
347 (1967)Ramirez vs.
CA, G.R. No. 93833,
September 28, 1995
Privileged
Communications
In Re Laureta, 148
SCRA 382
(1987)People vs.
Albofera, 152 SCRA
123 (1987)Zulueta v.
Court of Apeals, 253
SCRA 699
(1996)Deano v.
Godinez, 12 SCRA 483
(1964)Waterhouse Drug
Corporation v. NLRC,
G.R. No. 113271.
October 16, 1997
6. Exclusionary Rule
Art. III, Sec.
3(2)Silverthorne
Lumber vs. US, 251 US
385 (1920)People v.
Aruta, G. R. 120915,
April 3. 1998People v.
Rondero, G.R. 125687,
December 9, 1999
7. Liability for damages
Aberca vs. Ver, 160
SCRA 590 (1989)
F. RIGHTS OF
PERSONS UNDER
CUSTODIAL
INVESTIGATION
Art, II, Sec , 12Miranda
vs. Arizona , 384 US ,
436 (1966)
Custodial Investigation
People v. Lugod, G.R.
136253, February 21,
2001People v. Del
Rosario G.R. 127755,
April 14, 1999People v.
Bolanos, 211 SCRA
262 (1992)Rhode Island
v. Innis, 446 U.S. 291,
[1980]People v.
Mahinay, 302 SCRA
455 (1999)
Administrative
Investigations
People vs. Judge
Ayson, 175 SCRA 216
(1989)Office of the
Court Administrator v.
Sumilang, 271 SCRA
316 (1997)
Police Lineup
Gamboa vs.Cruz, 162
SCRA 642
(1988)United States v.
Wade, 388 U.A. 218
(1967)People v.
Escordial, G.R. 138934,
January 16, 2002People
vs. Piedad, et al., G.R.
No. 131923, December
5, 2002
Cases before January
17, 1973 not applicable
Magtoto vs.Manguera,
63 SCRA 4
(1975)People vs.
Page,77 SCRA 384
(1977)
Rule under the 1973
Constitution
(Voluntary, knowing &
intelligent waiver)
People vs. Caguioa, 95
SCRA 2 (1980)People
vs. Tampus, 90 SCRA
624 (1980)
The Galit Rule
People vs. Galit, 135
SCRA 465 (1985)
Rule under the 1987
ConstitutionRequireme
nt of Independent
Counsel
People vs. Bandula, 232
SCRA 566
(1994)People v.
Quidato, G.R. 117401,
October 1, 1998People
v. Rous, 242 SCRA 732
(1995)People v.
Januario. 267 SCRA
608 (1997)People v.
Labtan, GR. No. 12793,
December 8,
1999People vs. Samus,
G.R. 135957-58,
September 17, 2002
Counsel of Choice
People vs. Gallardo,
G.R. No. 113684, Jan.
25, 2000

People vs. Barasina,
229 SCRA 450 (1994)
Counsels presence
required in entire
proceedings
People v. Morial, G.R.
129295, August 15,
2001
Seized Articles
People v. Castro. 274
SCRA 115
(1997)People v. Wong
Chuen Ming. 256
SCRA 182
(1996)Marcelo v.
Sandiganbayan, 302
SCRA 102 (1999)
Confession to
Newsmen
People v. Andan. 269
SCRA 95 (1997)People
v. Endino, G.R.
133026, February 20,
2001People vs. Ordono,
G.R. No. 132154, June
29, 2000People vs.
Guillermo, GR. No.
147786, January 20,
2004
Other Confessions
People v. Gomez, 270
SCRA 432
(1997)Illinois v.
Perkins, 496 U.S. 292
(1990)People v. Lugod,
G.R. 136253, February
21, 2001
Re-enactment
People v. Luvendino,
211 SCRA 36 (1992)
4. Exclusionary rule
Art. III, Sec. 12 (3)
Fruit of the Poisonous
Tree Doctrine
People v. Alicando 251
SCRA 293
(1995)Harris vs. New
York, 401 U.S. 222
(1971)New York vs.
Quarles, 104 S. U. 2626
(1984)
G. RIGHT TO BAIL
Art. III, Sec. 13
1. When right may be
invoked
Herras Teehankee vs.
Rovira, 75 Phil. 634
(1945)People vs. San
Diego, 26 SCRA 522
(1968)Cortes v. Judge
Catral, A.M. No. RTJ-
97-1387, September 10,
1997Lavides v. CA,
G.R. No. 129670.
February 1,
2000Government v.
Judge Puruganan, G.R.
148571, December 17,
2002
Procedure for bail
Paderanga v. Drilon,
247 SCRA 741,
(1995).Go v.
Bongolan.A.M. 99-
1464, July 26,
1999People v. Gako,
G.R. 135045, December
15, 2000Marallag v.
Judge Cloribel, A.M.
1529-RTJ, April 9,
2002
Bail and Habeas Corpus
Enrile vs. Salazar, 186
SCRA 217
(1990)People vs. Judge
Donato, 198 SCRA 130
(1991)
Bail on appeal
People vs. Fortes, 223
SCRA 619
(1993)Maguddatu v.
CA, G.R. No. 139599.
February 23,
2000Obosa v. Court of
Appeals, G.R. 114350,
January 16, 1997
2. Standards for fixing
bail
Rule 114, Sec.
10Villasenor vs. Abano,
21 SCRA 312 (1967)De
la Camara vs. Enage, 41
SCRA 1 (1971)Almeda
vs. Villaluz, 66 SCRA
38 (1975)Yap v. Court
of Appeals, G.R. No.
141529, June 6, 2001
Scra Cases
Add To Collection
34.6K
Reads
232
Readcasts
33
Embed Views

Published by
Apple_Lasig_4853



TIP Press Ctrl-F to search anywhere in the document.
Info and Rating
Category: Uncategorized.
Rating:

Upload Date: 03/15/2010
Copyright: Attribution Non-commercial
Tags: No tags
Free download or readfalse online for free.
Flag for inappropriate content
Download and print this document
Read offline in your PDF viewer
Edit this document in Adobe Acrobat, Microsoft Word, Notepad
Keep a copy in case this version is deleted from Scribd
Read and print without ads
Email the file
Choose a format to download in


.PDF


.DOC


.TXT
Recommended

27 p.

Case Digest (Scribd)
Roberto Martin Buenaventura
16300 Reads

8 p.

Cases Consti 1
domz7411
36320 Reads

171 p.

Constitutional Law 2 Collated Digests
Pam Perez
23191 Reads

25 p.

conslw
24494 Reads
Notes
Post Note

About
About Scribd
Team
Blog
Join our team!
Contact Us
Premium
Premium Reader
Scribd Store
Advertise with us
Get started
AdChoices
Support
Help
FAQ
Press
Partners
Developers / API
Legal
Terms
Privacy
Copyright
Copyright 2013 Scribd Inc.
Language:
English