2. Right to appeal statutory CRIMINAL DUE PROCESS ELEMENTS 1. Heard in a court of competent jurisdiction 2. Preceded against under the orderly processes of law 3. Gien notice and opportunity to !e heard ". #udgment was awarded within authority of constitutional law $ection 1% Rights of the accused at the trial 1. PRESUMED INNOCENT NONAI!A"LE &'' criminal prosecutions right to !e presumed innocent until contrary is P(R) Reason% principle of justice and moral certainty Reasona!le dou!t engendered !y an inestigation of whole proof and an ina!ility* after such inestigation* to let the mind rest easy upon the certainty of guilt 1. &!solute certainty + demanded to conict #. ,-R&' ./R0&1203 is re4uired as to eery proposition of proof re4uisite to constitute the offense Ratio% slightest possi!ility of an innocent man !eing conicted for an offense he has not committed 5 letting a guilty person go unpunished for a crime he may hae perpetrated /4uipoise rule where the eidence of the parties in a criminal case are eenly !alanced* the presumption of innocence will tilt in faour of the accused 6 ac4uittal o 'egislature may enact that when certain facts hae !een proed 6 prima facie eidence of e7istence of guilty 8 shift the !urden of proof o PR-9% rational connection !etween facts proed 8 ultimate fact presumed o /7amples% 1. :ne7plained flight 2. ;ailure to e7plain possession of stolen property 3. ;ailure to account funds and property of a P- entrusted to him $/';<)/;/2$/% person who ino=ed $) is presumed guilty 6 R/9/R$/ 0R1&' #. IN$ORMED O$ T%E NATURE AND CAUSE O$ T%E ACCUSATION A&AINST %IM AI!A"LE 'fai( to o)*ect du+i,g t+ia(- ,eans of informing 1. P1 2. Re4uirement of sufficient allegations in info/complaint 3. &rraignment ". (ill of particulars >. Rules against duplicity of offense GR% & + !e conicted of an offense unless it is clearly charged in the info or complaint -therwise% iolation of constitutional right /+.% &n information which lac=s essential allegations may still sustain a coniction when the accused ;&1'$ 0- -(#/.0 to its sufficiency ):R12G 0H/ 0R1&' and the deficiency was .:R/) !y competent eidence presented 6 ?&19/R of constitutional right o Re4uired% information state facts 8 circumstances constituting the crime charged @common understanding may easily comprehends and !e informedA o .harged in a complaint with a crime 8 eidence + show that he is guilty* !ut does show that he is guilty of a lesser offense 6 sentence to the lesser PR-9% lesser offense is cognate 8 included in the complaint o B/&. must !e alleged and proed to !e considered o )/$.R1P01-2 is controlling @+ designationA .. PRESENT / DE$END IN PERSON AND "0 COUNSEL AT E!ER0 STA&E O$ T%E PROCEEDIN& AI!A"LE GR% Presence of & during .R& is + re4uired and shall !e !ased on his sole discretion /+.% ,andatory in the ff% 1. )uring arraignment 2. Promulgation of sentence /+.% light offense presence of counsel/representatie 3. -rdered !y court for indentificaiton purposes 2-0 applica!le in $. and .& o + proceedings !efore .&* $.* entry and promulgation of their judgments @& 6 2- need to !e present in court during the hearing of appealA o ,ay waie his right to present during trial H?9R% his presence may !e compelled when he is to !e identified Re4uisites of waier 1. /7istence of a right 2. Cnowledge 3. 1ntention to relin4uish ". &ssisted !y counsel to !e alid /ffects of waier of the right to appear 1. ?aied of right to present eidence and cross<e7amine witnesses 2. Prosecution can present eidence 3. .ourt can decide without &Ds eidence 0rial in a!sentia 1. 2on<appearance &;0/R &RR&1G2,/20 despite due notice 2. ?aies right to meet the witnesses face to face 3. + mean 6 release of & from his o!ligation under the !ond to appear in court whener so re4uired ". ?&19/ right !ut + duty or o!ligation in court >. Re4uirements o (een arraigned o )uly notified of trial o :njustified non<appearance /scapee duly tried in a!sentia waies his right to present eidence on his own !ehalf and to confront and cross< e7amine witnesses who testified against him Right to counsel &($-':0/ and may !e ino=ed at &'' times een on appeal o ?/o aid of counsel person may !e conited + !ecause he is guilty !ut !ecause he + =now how to esta!lish innocence o 1ncludes% custodial inestigation* rendition of judgment* appeal o &($-':0/E Right to counsel de parte 6 + a!solute )ifference !etween R. during arraignment and during the trial &RR&1G2,/20 0R1&' .ourt inform the accused of right to counsel and proide him with 1 in case he cannot afford it. .ourt act on its own olition* unless waier of right & assert right to counsel .ourt will 2-0 act unless the accused ino=es his right .ustodial inestigation 4uestioning !y '/- of a suspect ta=en into custody or otherwise depried of his freedom of action in a significant way. 1ncludes practice of issuing an 12910&01-2 to a person inestigated in connection with an offense he is suspected to hae committed )ifference !etween R. during .1 and during trial 0R1&' .1 R. means /;;/.019/ counsel. .ounsel defend the accused @+ preent from confessingA $tricter re4uirement% Presence of .-,P/0/20 and 12)/P/2)/20 counsel prefera!ly the choice of & .1 is + done in pu!lic 8 danger that confessions may !e e7acted against will of & 2-0 &PP'3% spontaneous statement 7 elicited through 4uestioning !ut oral admission 2-0 &PP'3% admission or confession !efore .1 .onfessions @w/o counselA 6 + admissi!le as eidence to incriminate the accused (:0% may !e used to impeach the credi!ility of & or treated as er!al admission through the testimony of persons who heard it or conducted the inestigation of & '&?3/R failure to inform appealant of latterDs right to remain silent !y his coming and going* during the .1 8 a!rupt departure !efore termination of proceedings 6 + competent 0H:$% still 12&),1$$1('/ &$$1$0% from the time confessant answers the 1 st 4uestion until the signing of the e7trajudicial confession R. and R0R$ + cease een after a complaint or information has already !een filed 6 &$ '-2G &$ H/ 1$ 12 .:$0-)3 .-:2$/' )/ -;;1.1- 6 mandatory only at the time of &RR&1G2,/20 @+ legal counsel of choiceE desire to employe .)-A .onse4uences of denial of right to counsel R/0R1&' when represented !y a fa=e lawyer -ffended party .&22-0 waie assistance of counsel -P can only interene in the case of F(3 .-:2$/'D o -P + afford a priate prosecutor 6 P:('1. PR-$/.:0-R can represent him 1. TESTI$0 AS ITNESS IN %IS ON "E%AL$ AI!A"LE ;ailure to testify is not ta=en against him !ut failure to produce eidence in his !ehalf is against him &,/R1.&2 R:'/ /2G'1$H R:'/ 1f the & testifies* he may !e cross<e7amined. (:0% only on matters coered !y his direct e7amination &n ordinary witness can !e cross< e7amined as to any matter stated in the direct e7amination or connected therewith 5. E2EMPT $ROM "EIN& COMPELLED TO "E A ITNESS A&AINST %IMSEL$ AI!A"LE Right against self<incrimination incriminate or su!ject & to penal lia!ility o ?&19&('/% failure to ino=e priilege at propert time 6 &;0/R 1B is as=ed o 1ncriminating B su!ject him to lia!ility R1GH0 -; 0H/ &..:$/) R1GH0 -; &2 -R)12&R3 ?102/$$ & may altogether refuse to ta=e the witness stand and refuse to answer any and all 4uestions -? may !e compelled to ta=e the witness stand and claim the priilege as each 4uestion re4uiring him an incriminating answer is shot at him H?9/R% 1f & testifies in his own !ehalf* then he may !e cross<e7amined as any -? 6 waier of right against self<incrimination 8 he .&22-0 refuse to answer any 4uestion (:0% he ,&3 refuse to answer for an offense )1$012.0 for that which he is charged $cope prohi!ition against testimonial compulsion and production !y the accused of incriminating documents and articles demanded from o 1t does 2-0 coer ecamination of his (-)3 as eidence* when it may !e material% Physical e7amination /7am of rapist and ictim for gonorrhea alid Pregnancy e7am adultery :ltra iolet light for e7amination of presence of fluorescent powder dusted on mar=ed money !uy !ust ;urnishing of a specimen of signature in a falsification of document case is .-9/R/) !y the right o ?riting is + purely a mechanical act 6 intelligence and attention 2-0 include cases coered !y immunity statutes% o R& 13GH forfeiture of illegally o!tained wealth o R& G"H !ri!ery and graft cases ?here aaila!le% .R !ut also got proceedings penal sanction inoled ?here ino=ed% after as=ing of a B and !efore answering it Rationale for protecting the right against self<incrimination o Humanitarian reasons preent state from using coercie powers o Practical reasons commit perjury B on past criminal lia!ility which he may still !e prosecuted 6 .-9/R/)E if he + prosecuted 6 2-0 ino=e )2& samples 2-0 iolate R$1E applies to eidence that is communicatie in essence ta=en under duress 0a=ing of & of the witness stand 6 ?&19/R of R$1 on cross<e7amination with respect to offense in 4uestion o (:0% if e7amination incriminates him with -0H/R offenses 6 ,&3 ino=e R$1 Rights of the accused in the matter of testifying or producing eidence (/;-R/ .&$/ &;0/R .&$/ 1$ ;1'/) 1. !e 12;-R,/). 2. R/,&12 $1'/20 &2) 0- .-:2$/' 3. 2-0 0- (/ $:(#/.0/) to force/iolence or other means which itiate free will ". H&9/ /91)/2./ o!tained in iolation of these rights rejected 1. R/;:$/ to !e a witness 2. 2-0 H&9/ &23 PR/#:)1./ result to him !y such refusal 3. 0/$01;3 in his own !ehalf su!ject to cross<e7amination ". R/;:$/ a specific 4uestion which tends to incriminate him for other crime 2 types of immunity :$/ 1,,:2103 0R&2$&.01-2&' 1,,:2103 ?itnessD compelled testimony 8 fruits + !e used in su!se4uent prosecution of a crime against him ?itness immune from prosecution of a crime to which his compelled testimony relates ?itness can still !e prosecuted !ut the compelled testimony cannot !e used against him ?itness + !e prosecuted at all /ffect of refusal of accused to testify GR% $ilence should 2-0 prejudice the accused /+.% :nfaora!le inference is drawn when% o Prosecution has already esta!lished a prima facie case* the & must present proof to oerturn o )efense of & is an ali!i 8 he does not testify the interference is that the ali!i is not !eliea!le 3. CON$RONT AND CROSS E2AMINE ITNESSES A&AINST %IM AT TRIAL AI!A"LE o Had the opportunity to ./ a witness !ut failed to aail himself of it 6 forfeits the right to ./ and testimony gien on direct e7amination will !e allowed to remain in record o 1n .R proceeding defendant enjoys the right to hae compulsory process to secure the attendance of witness and production of eidence on his !ehalf .onfrontation act of setting a witness ;0; with the accused so that the latter may may ma=e any o!jection he has to the witness and the witness may identify the & and this must ta=e place in the presence of the court haing jurisdiction to permit the priilege of cross<e7amination Purpose% secure opportunity of ./ 2 nd purpose% ena!le the judge to o!sere the demeanor of witness /+.% either party may utiliIe as part of its eidence the testimony of a witness who is deceased* out of country* w/ due diligience cannot !e found in PH* unaaila!le* otherwise una!le to testify* gien in another c ase or proceeding* judicial or administratie* inoling the same parties and su!ject matter* &)9/R$/ P&R03 6 ,&3 .R-$$</+&,12/ 4. COMPULSOR0 PROCESS AI!A"LE Right to hae a su!poena or $)0 issued in his !ehalf in order to compel the attendance of witness and production of other eidence 1f a ? refuse to testify when re4uired 6 contemptE order a witness to gie !ail or !e arrested Purpose% assure full and unimpeded opportunity for him to meet what in the end could !e a !aseless suit or accustaiton Process% 1. $u!poena #. $)0 .. ?-& 1. .ontempt 5. Perpetuation of testimony 3. ,odes of discoery 5. SPEED06 IMPARTIAL AND PU"LIC TRIAL NONAI!A"LE 2o iolation% delay imputa!le to accused Purpose% aoid oppression and preent delay ;acts considered if iolation% 1. .onduct of parties 2. 'ength of delay 3. Reason ". &Ds assertion or non<assertion of right >. Prejudice to & Remedies% 1. ,0) iolation of right 2. ?H. illegal restraint 3. Relief in madamus compel dismissal of information /ffect of dismissal for iolation of &Ds right to $0 o )ismissal 6 ac4uittal o &ny attempt to prosecute for same offense 6 )# $P//)3 0R1&' &.0 -; 1HHJ @R& J"H3A )uty of the court after arraignment of & o .ourt shall order a pre<trial conference to consider the ff% 1. Plea !argaining 2. $tipulation of facts 3. ,ar=ing for identification of eidence of parties ". ?aier of o!jections to admissi!ility of eidence >. -ther matter to promote a fair and e7peditious trial o 0ime limit for trial of criminal cases o GR% 2-0 e7ceed 1JK days from 1 st day of trial o /+.% 1. $ummary procedure 2. 2-0 e7ceed L months or fine of 1= or !oth 3. authoriIed !y .# of $. o )-/$ 2-0 preclude justifia!le postponements and delays when so warranted o Period for arraignment of & within 3K days from filing of info* or from the date & appealed @whicheer date last occursA o ?hen shall trial commence after arraignment within 3K days from arraignment 1mpartial trial )P re4uires a hearing !efore an impartial and disinterested itri!unal 6 cold neutrality of impartial judge Pu!lic trial held openly or pu!licly o $ufficient% family and friends who want to watch proceedings are gien opportunity to witness proceedings o /7clusion of pu!lic% /idence is offensie to decency or pu!lic morals ,otion of & Rule on trial !y pu!licity 2-0 incompati!le to free press. o Perasie pu!licity is 2-0 per se prejudicial to the right to fair trial. o 0o warrant a finding of prejudicial pu!licity% &llegations and proof that judges hae !een unduly influenced + simply !arrage of pu!licity 7. APPEAL IN ALL CASES ALLOED "0 LA AND MANNER PRESCRI"ED "0 LA AI!A"LE R0& from a judgment of coniction statutory right o ,ay !e denied !y legislature as long as hearing is conducted @/+.% appellate jurisdiction of $. + remoedA o 1f there is a statutory grant of appeal% denial 6 iolation ?aier of right to appeal personal to accusedE waied e7pressly or impliedly o H?9R% )eath penalty is imposed right .&22-0 !e waied as the reiew of the judgment !y $. is automatic and madntory o ,andatory reiew of cases @death penaltyA pass through an initial reiew !y .& 113 A++aig,8e,t a,d 9(ea