You are on page 1of 4

how many banks are we talking about in the chosen industry

15
right now how many banks complied
6
is it substantial
the assets of these six banks are represents more than 3/4 of the top 36
banks, choosing the listed banks within that 36 banks
don't you think choosing the top banks would be biased i don't think that
this would be representati!e of the industry" the top banks would ob!iously
score higher, but the other banks might score lower"
there's a limitation
which bank has the highest asset
1"6 trillion
why do we need the top 36
you're limiting the generali#ability of your study
what banks were remo!ed
it's good if you determine the banks and say that what are operating and not
pwedeng tingnan ang osiris
pwedeng sabihin$ we got responses from 4%& of the population
15 operating is the scope 'publicly listed banks still operating as of 31 (arch
)%14*
scope + kanino originally intended ibigay
remo!e the computation of assets
assets not determining factor ++, factual
basis of generali#ation would be the 4%&
15 / 15 - kung .attened bawat bank - each bank
saying that indeed 4%& is able to adress the generali#ation
the thing about bias, add it in the implications for the conclusion
)nd leg,
what's the basis of the three le!el 3
we used the )"/0,
how did you get the hypothesis le!el 3
5 is the e!entual ob1ecti!e
you were saying that banks, ad1usted )"/0, 4"1/ unad1usted
why are you ha!e an ad1usted 2gure
using the 3((4, there's nobody in cap 5
dapat nilagay nyo na based on that
3rd were you able to answer this hypothesis"
how did you determine if you strictly comply or not
they don't ha!e strict compliance
do you ha!e a statistical test that they ha!e strictly complied
parang nagkaconclusion kayo without any statistic e!idence
your not trying to detect, you're 1ust trying to happen what's happening
do it
4th, your respondents answered but their designation/background are
di5erent, how can you say that they were !alid
apprently when we contacted the hr to inter!iew of the 346" but then they
referred someone else
hindi ba kayo nagtataka kung bakit bias ang sagot nila, operations ang
respondents niyo kaya naging bias sila kasi un ung naiintindihan nilang part
what were trying to point out is the !alidity, because you're generali#ing
dapat pare+pareho yung le!el ng designation ng mga nag sagot at least
the 4"1/ is coming from the lense of not a 346
and the processes that were high are in the operations because they were
the respondents
47838 o9cers can answer your sur!ey because they ha!e members who are
part of the banks
1ustify each responders' background on 4:" put a column that these
respondents know what they are doing
actually, speaking of recommendations
paki ayos, you told that part of your recommendations that these banks
should take these banks seriously, use the words speci2cally for example
;<(, =
recommend on these, owners, customers, employeee
presentation should not be in the future tense
conclusions part
why did you choose le!el 4, dapat ideal yung nakalagay
during the t+test part, what did you compare
bakit parang isa lang ang nakita kong p !alue sa per domain
1 t !alue 1 signi2cant !alue"
yung isa 30 control process
outliers were remo!ed, siyempre may di5erence, i don't see the point kasi
masyado malayo ang 4 sa )" malaki yung e5ect ng outliers so hindi kailangan
yan"
alam niyo gawin pero hindi niyo siya alam gawin appropriately
hindi niyo naanswer yung hypothesis niyo kasi ung sa t test ung basis ng
sagot sa hypothesis
use the 1 tailed for the hypothesis
ung hypothesis at least established
conclusion
hypothesis one use the corporate !iew + instance !iew

You might also like