Evidence from Global Markets Mark Kritzman, CFA, and Sbastien Page Journal of Asset Management vol. 3, no. 3 (December 2002):202212 The authors challenge the widely held belief that the asset allocation decision is more important than the security selec- tion decision. They believe that investors have misinterpreted the results of prior studies and show that choosing stocks within the equity component of the portfolio is substantially more valuable than choosing a portfolios exposure among stocks, bonds, and cash. The authors review the current literature supporting the widely held view that asset allocation is more important than security selection. They find nothing inherently wrong with the studies that have been done but nevertheless conclude that a mathematical model of relative importance, rather than a decomposition of historical performance, is necessary to assess the relative value of asset allocation versus security selection. The authors define importance as the extent to which a particular investment activity causes a dispersion in wealth. This metric matters to investors who believe they possess, or can acquire, the skill needed to exploit this volatility and increase wealth by going beyond a passive indexing strategy. To simulate real-world conditions, the authors use bootstrapping and a dataset that includes individual stock returns. Their simulation procedure produces cumulative returns over 14 years for 1,000 port- folios whose stock allocation is fixed at 60 percent; individual stocks are selected randomly each year. The importance of security selection is measured by holding the asset mix constant at a 60/30/10 allocation among stocks, bonds, and cash, and then calculating the variation in return caused purely by the variation among randomly diversified Mark Kritzman, CFA, is at Windham Capital Management Boston and State Street Associates. Sbastien Page is at State Street Associates. The summary was prepared by Frederick J. Cornelius, CFA, Burt Associates, Inc. Portfolio Management 75 aimrpubs.org stock portfolios. The authors conduct a second simulation to isolate the importance of asset allocation by randomly selecting different asset allocations and holding the security selection constant. The results show that random variation among individual securities within the stock component of a portfolio causes substantially more return variation than random asset allocation among stocks, bonds, and cash. The authors rank the portfolios by utility, which compen- sates for both return and risk, rather than simply by annualized return. This utility-ranking procedure further confirms the conclusion that security selection is more important than asset allocation. To quantify the value of asset allocation skill and security selection skill, the authors use a variation of the BlackScholes option pricing model. They find that the value of an exchange option for top-quartile security selection performance exceeds that of an exchange option for top-quartile asset allocation performance by a factor of four. This trend is apparent not only in the United States but also in all the countries studied. This finding reinforces their earlier results about the relative importance of security selection. The authors believe that many investors have falsely concluded that asset allocation is more important than security selection because past studies have successfully attributed historical performance to the asset allocation decision. These studies, however, failed to distinguish between investor behavior and capital market opportunities. Thus, the authors assert, the correct methodology must control for investor behavior in order to isolate the relative importance of the asset allocation versus the security selection decision. In addition, they maintain that the dominance of asset allocation in explaining past performance merely reflects the industrys unwillingness to engage in meaningful security selection. Keywords: Portfolio Management: asset allocation