This study examined the use of questioning technique to improve students' writing achievement in descriptive texts. It found that using questioning technique in two cycles of classroom instruction led to higher average student test scores. In the initial test, students averaged 59.86. After the first cycle, their average increased to 67.8. Following the second cycle, students' average score was 74.63. The study concluded that questioning technique significantly improved students' writing achievement in descriptive texts.
This study examined the use of questioning technique to improve students' writing achievement in descriptive texts. It found that using questioning technique in two cycles of classroom instruction led to higher average student test scores. In the initial test, students averaged 59.86. After the first cycle, their average increased to 67.8. Following the second cycle, students' average score was 74.63. The study concluded that questioning technique significantly improved students' writing achievement in descriptive texts.
This study examined the use of questioning technique to improve students' writing achievement in descriptive texts. It found that using questioning technique in two cycles of classroom instruction led to higher average student test scores. In the initial test, students averaged 59.86. After the first cycle, their average increased to 67.8. Following the second cycle, students' average score was 74.63. The study concluded that questioning technique significantly improved students' writing achievement in descriptive texts.
WRITING DESCRIPTIVE TEXT THROUGH QUESTIONING TECHNIQUE
Eva Saskia Rahma Meisuri
Abstract This study concerned with the improvement of students achievement in writing descriptive text by applying Questioning technique. The objective of this study was to discover whether questioning technique could significantly improve students achievement in writing descriptive text. It was conducted by using classroom action research which was carried out in two cycles in six meetings. The subject of the research was class VIII-1 SMP Negeri 2 Lima Puluh. The number of the students was 30. The instruments for collecting data were writing tests as the quantitative data and diary notes, observation sheet, questionnaire sheet as qualitative data. Based on the students writing test, the students score was improved in every test. In the first test, the mean score was 59.86. In the second test, the mean score was 67.80. In the last test, the mean score of the students was 74.63. In the line with the data, it was showed that questioning technique significantly improved students achievement in writing descriptive text.
Keywords: Writing, Students Achievement, Descriptive Text, Questioning Technique
2
Introduction
The Background of Study Most of the students, in fact, think that writing is complicated to study. Students always get difficulties when they are asked to write in English. Based on interviewing conducted on VIII-1 SMPN 2 Lima Puluh Batu Bara , it was found that students achievement in English subject is still low. It was proved by their achievement in writing. As generally, based on the standard competency in the syllabus of the second grade of Junior High School (Sekolah Menengah Pertama : SMP) called Educational Unit-Oriented Curriculum (Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan: KTSP), students are expected to be able to write simple paragraphs in descriptive, recount, narrative, procedure and report. Descriptive text is a type of text that functions to describe particular person, place, or thing. Wyrick (2011:323) states that the writer of description creates a word-picture of people, places, objects, and emotions, using a careful selection of details to make an impression on the reader. Students who are going to write this type of text should be able to express what they see, hear, feel vividly. As generally known, Minimum Mastery Criteria ( MMC ) of English subject in many schools is up 70. From the KKM above, the score is very high for many school. Because we found that student has difficult to write a text well based on the genre. Specially in descriptive, students face difficulties because of reluctance to 3
question or less motivation, difficult to build and develop their ideas, the using of grammar and confuse in determining the generic structure of the text. The teacher just explained the material from the guiding book and after that asked the students to answer the question based on descriptive text that they have read. In Sharma (2008:39) said that the learning of language depends not so much on the number of years it is studied but on the motivation of the students, the type of teachers, method of teaching adopted, and instructional material designed. The reason why students still got low achievement in writing is not only from students themselves, but also from teacher. The conventional learning method that teacher applied in teaching writing skill is not effective. During learning activities in the classroom, the teacher only asks the students to read the text, translate the text by using dictionary, and rewrite the translation. The students are not asked to practice their writing ability. In addition, the teacher never makes variation in teaching and learning process. This situation made the students motivation in writing decrease. So, teacher has high responsibility to improve students achievement in writing. Teacher has to create interesting activities in the classroom so that students can develop their ideas in writing. From the problems mentioned above, the writer chooses to conduct this study by using Questioning Technique. Douglas & Nancy (2007:56) state that questioning is a powerful tool that teachers can use to engage students in authentic. Questioning is also an excellent way for teachers to check for understanding. It is believed that the technique can facilities the teaching of writing to the students because questioning 4
technique does not only help the teacher to connect the materials to the students real world but also motivates in teaching to apply questioning technique to the students writing descriptive text. However, questions can be effective when they are not thoughfully planned or when a teachers nonverbal behaviour indicates lack of interest in the responses or the individual responding. The strengths of this technique seem to help the students to organize their thoughts in a logical way and improve the use of adding detail to their writings. The research was conducted by using a classroom action research to discover improving of questioning technique in students achievement in writing a descriptive text in Senior High School.
Research Question Based on the background of the study, the problem of the study is formulated in the form of the question as follows, How can the implementation of questioning technique improve the students achievement in writing descriptive text ?
Methodology This research was conducted by applying Classroom Action Research (CAR). According to Burns (2010:2-3), Action Research (AR) can be a very valuable way to extend our teaching skills and gain more understanding of ourselves as teachers, our classrooms and our students. AR is part of a broad movement that has been going on in education generally for some time. It is related to the ideas of reflective practice 5
and the teacher as researcher. The central idea of the action part of AR is to intervene in a deliberate way in the problematic situation in order to bring about changes and, even better, improvements in practice. Importantly, the improvements that happen in AR are ones based on information (or to use the research term, data) that an action researcher collects systematically. The subject of this research was the second year students of Junior High School (SMPN-2 Lima Puluh Batu Bara) class VIII -1 which consisted of 30 students. In this research, the data were collected by using the quantitative and qualitative data. In the quantitative data, it used writing test as the instrument to measure the students achievement in writing. They were tested in writing a descriptive text by using questioning technique. The qualitative data were used to describe the situation during the teaching-learning process. The qualitative data are observation sheet, questionnaire, and diary notes.
Research and Findings This research had two cycles. Every cycle consisted of fours steps of action research; planning, action, observation, and reflection. Cycle I was conducted in two meetings and Cycle II was conducted in two meetings. So there were four meetings altogether. The data were taken from Grade VIII students of SMP N2 Lima Puluh; VIII-1 consisting of 30 students. The quantitative data were taken from the mean of students scores in writing tests. The qualitative data were taken from the observation sheet, interview, questionnaire, and diary notes. The quantitative data were analyzed from the written 6
test during the conduction of the research and in the end of each cycle. In the first cycle, the teacher did not move to check students work so they could not ask a help when they found the difficulties for example it was found that the students felt difficult to classify which one of identification and description. Beside it, they also did not understand enough about grammar and the words. After knowing the problems, in the second cycle the researcher tried to improve this weakness by walking around from one group to other group to assure whether the students contribute their ideas in discussion or not. This research had proved the effectiveness of applying questioning technique. It was shown in the table 1 about the students score from test 1, test 2, and test 3. It was caused by the teacher controlling the class better and also directly admonishing the noisy students. So the class became effective. And the students data in the test 3 of cycle II showed that the mean of studentss score was higher than the mean of the studentss score in the test 2 of cycle I and it was also betetr than the test 1 result. This improvement not only happened in the mean of the students score but also the expression, interest, and excitement of the students showed that there was improvement. It can be seen in the diary notes, observation sheets, and questionnaire sheets. Most of the students were more active and enthusiast during teaching-learning process. Therefore, it can be concluded that the application of questioning technique signficantly improved students writing achievement in descriptive text.
7
Conclusions and Suggestions Conclusions Based on the result of the study there was an improvement on the students writing descriptive text by using Questioning Technique. The improvement could be seen from the mean of students namely: the mean of Test I (59.86) , the mean of test II ( 67.80 ) and the mean of test III ( 74.63 ). Beside that, the students were more enjoyable and interested in learning writing descriptive text by using Questioning Technique. Through the observation sheets, questionnaire, and diary notes, the improvement in learning result by applying questioning technique was also proved. Therefore, the apply questioning technique could significantly improve the students writing achievement in writing descriptive text. It is showed by their enthusiasm and respond in writing descriptive text in the two cycles.
Suggestions The result of this research shows that the use of questioning technique improves the students achievement in writing descriptive text. These following suggestions are directed to the English teachers are recommended to use questioning as the technique in teaching writing. To the students, to use questioning technique while writing in the class so they can write descriptive text easily. To all the readers, may this research bring them into good understanding how to improve the students writing ability through questioning technique.
8
REFERENCES
Bowering & Malakul. 2006. The application of Genre Theory to improve Academic English Writing Courses. Education journal, 328-334.
Brown, H. D. 2001. Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy. Second Edition. San Francisco: Longman.
Brown, H. D. 2004. Language Assessment Principles and Classroom Practices. San Francisco: Longman. Clark, H. M., & Clark, E. V. 1997. Psychology and Language: An Introduction to Psycholinguistics. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Costello, P.J.M. 2003. Action Research. London : Continuum.
Eveline & Hartini. 2010. Teori Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.
Feed, S. 1998. Text- based Syllabus Design. Sydney: Macquarie University.
Fisher & Frey. 2007. Checking for Understanding: Formative Assessment Technique for Your Classroom. Alexandria,Virginia: ASCD.
Graham & Perin. 2007. Writing Next: Effective Strategies to Improve Writing of Adolescents in Middle and High Schools. New York: Alliance for Excellent Education.
Gutierrez & Stella. 2011. A Dolescents Awareness of Environmental Care: Experiences When Writing Short Descriptive Text in English. Journal of Profile Issues in Teachers Professional Development, 13(1) 11-23.
Harmer, J. 2001. The Practice of English Language Teaching (rev. ed). London: Longman.
Harmer, J. 2004. Practice English Language Teaching. Cambridge: Longman.
Knapp, P. & Watkins, M. 2005. Genre, Text, and Grammar: Technology for Teaching and Assessing Writing. Sydney, Australia: UNSW Press.
Lyster, R. 2007. Learning and Teaching Languages Through Content. The Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
9
Muirhead, B. 2005. Using Outline to Improve Student Writing Skill. The internet i- managers journal on School Educational Technology, 1 (3) 17-23.
Oshima and Hongue. 1997. Introduction to Academic Writing. Second Edition. White Plains, NY: Longman.
http://undesrtandingtext.blogspot.com/2013/04/what-is-descriptive-text.html, accessed on April 18 2013.
http://www.google.com/what/is/speaking.html,accessed on April 18 2013. http://www.google.com/what/is/listening.html,accessed on April 18 2013. http://www.google.com/what/is/reading.html,accessed on April 18 2013.