Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2489
I. INTRODUCTION
Fig. 1.
2490
Fig. 5. Pressure distribution of slider flying over DTR media. a) Entire air
bearing surface. b) Detail of pressure at trailing edge pad.
Fig. 3. Femto designs 14 [a)d), respectively].
TABLE I
RESULTING MODEL SIZES
Fig. 4.
DTR parameter.
size was realized on the two side pad surfaces. The rest of the
air bearing surface was meshed with elements 1 m in size.
The resulting model sizes for all air bearing designs used in this
study are summarized in Table I.
Fig. 4 shows the parameters that determine DTR media. They
are groove depth (d), groove width (w), and groove pitch (p), respectively. For the simulation of the pico design, we have used a
m and a constant groove pitch
constant groove width of
of
m. The groove depth was chosen to be between zero
nm). For the femto designs,
and eight nanometer (
nm and a groove
we have chosen a groove width of
nm, due to the very fine meshes for these
pitch of
designs. The range of the simulated groove depth was from 0 to
nm). The skew angle for all simula15 nanometer (
tions was assumed to be zero.
III. SIMULATION RESULTS
Fig. 5(a) shows a typical pressure distribution of a slider
flying over DTR media using a uniform mesh. A magnified
view of the pressure distribution in the area of the trailing edge
center is shown in Fig. 5(b). We observe from Fig. 5(b) that the
grooves influence the pressure distribution in the trailing edge
area significantly. However, very little change in the pressure
distribution was found in areas of high spacing. Thus, it is
apparent that a fine mesh is needed only in the areas of high
pressure and low spacing, while a larger mesh size can be
2491
Fig. 8. Relative peak pressure increase. a) Just femto designs. b) All designs.
that
in our simulations. This result is an indication for the dominant role of the trailing edge pad in the designs
investigated.