Faisalabad Development Authority, Faisalabad Respected Sir, It is humbly requested that I submitted an application on 05-05-2014 against the decision made in DPC meeting held on 17-04-2014. Despite of, to considering the facts mentioned in the application, all the candidates were promoted except me and Qamar Abbas. I again humbly submit the following facts for your kind information and consideration please. 1- Mr. Wajid Hassan He has been promoted as Director Town Planning Bs-19 where as a regular inquiry under PEEDA Act 2006 is outstanding/under process against him. His case required to be deferred in accordance with promotion policy-2010 sub rule 9 (iv) copy attached. 2- Mohammad Ayoub He has been promoted as Deputy Director (NT) Bs-18 against the rules and regulation of the Govt of the Punjab as well as FDA. He was original appointed as Steno typist in the year 18-12-1976. He was granted selection grade Bs-17 and granted regular promotion in Bs-17 as PS to DG on 17- 10-2008. Later on promotion as Assistant Director (NT) Bs-17 Ex-Cadre are not justified or correct. Govt of Punjab vides notification No. SOR-III (S&GAD) 3-17/2013 dated 23-08- 2013 has Banned ex-Cadre promotion. (Copy attached). In the instant DPC meeting held on 17-4-2014 has rejected the promotion of Stenographers as PS To DG Bs-17 and as AD (NT) Bs-17 on the grounds that the FDA regulation is not correct and required amendment. As the promotion of Mr. Ayoub as Selection grade Bs-17 as PS to DG Bs-17 as well as AD (NT) Bs-17 possessing qualification as simple B.A in incorrect and required to be reviewed under the rules. Similarly his promotion as Deputy Director (NT) Bs-18 is also incorrect. Abdul Samad Cheema & Khalid Hameed They here been promoted as Deputy Director ( ) Bs-18 before completing the length of service as mentioned in FDA Regulation. Both the officer were promoted as AD (NT) Bs-17 as on 31-03-2010. Required length of service for promotion in Bs-18 as mentioned in FDA regulation is 5 years in Bs-17 with graduation. They can be promoted after 5 years regular service in Bs-17 as or on after 30-03-2015. So their promotion as AD Bs-18 (NT) is irregular and required to be re- considered. Mohammad Ashraf and Asif Hussain They are promoted as Stenographer Bs-16, prior their absorption in FDA. Both the Stenographer was transferred to FDA but they here not been absorbed permanently in FDA so they cannot be promoted till their absorption in FDA. Mohammad Tariq Butt, Mukhtar Siddiqui and Qamar Abbas Shah. Mr. Mukhtar Ahmad Siddiqui has been promoted as Senior Accountant Bs-16 whereas Qamar Abbas Shah has been dropped due to less qualification. Mr. Mukhtar Ahmad Siddiqui and Qamar Abbas Shah were promoted as Sr. Accounts Assistant Bs-7 in the year 1986 possession qualification as FDA and Matriculation respectively, whereas the required qualification as mentioned in FDA regulation is Intercom or B.A. Later on, they were promoted as Assistant Account Bs-13 on 24-6-2008 possessing same qualification. Which is less than the prescribed qualification as mentioned in FDA Regulation. His promotion as JAA and Assistant Accountant is illegal and unjustified being less qualification so further promotion as Sr. Accountant Bs-16 is another regulation, which required to be reconsidered and reviewed under the rules. Maqbool Hussain Tahir Mr. Maqbool Hussain Tahir was promoted as AD(Tech) Bs-17 as on 17-10- 2008 against the reserved quota of Assistant Research Officer. The said official was appointed as ARO having qualification as DAE (Civil) for 3 years, whereas the required qualification for appointment as ARO mentioned in FDA regulation is B.sc from a recognized University. So he was appointed being less qualifications. Furthermore his promotion as AD (Tech) bs-17 is also irregular/unjustified as was not possessed the required qualifications at that time as mentioned in FDA Regulations. Therefore his promotion as AD (Tech) Bs-17 is required to be reconsidered under the rules. It is further humbly submitted that my promotion case as AD (Tech) Bs-17 was deferred due to Seniority Dispute. Sir, the factual position has not been conveyed by the Admin Director reason best known to them. The correct position is that I am at Sr. No.1 of the Seniority Lists of my cadre circulated time to time whereas the seniority disputes start from Sr. No.3 or onward. There is no dispute of seniority against Sr. No.1 or 2. In case the seniority is changed then I would be again at Sr. No.1 so the deferment of my promotion case is not covered under the rules. I merely be linked due to like and dislike. It is therefore again requested that my case for promotion may kindly be considered from the date of earlier DPC meeting held on 17-4-2014 to make the both ends of justice and to avoid me from financial hardships and mental torture please. Thank you an anticipation.
To The Additional Director General, FDA, Faisalabad.
Subject: REQUEST FOR DPC MINUTES OF MEETING HELD ON 17-04-2014.
It is requested that a copy of minutes of meeting held on 17-4-2014 may kindly be provided for my record. I shall be pay the cost of copies on demand please if applicable.