a proof for convergence and short notes on CMV (computed met visibility). it is thoroughly concise and to the point. a slight knowledge of trigonometry is require
a proof for convergence and short notes on CMV (computed met visibility). it is thoroughly concise and to the point. a slight knowledge of trigonometry is require
a proof for convergence and short notes on CMV (computed met visibility). it is thoroughly concise and to the point. a slight knowledge of trigonometry is require
c = PAD PBA = 180 PAB PBA c = 90 (PAB + PBA) cot c= cot {90 (PAB + PBA)} = tan (PAB + PBA) By Napiers analogies for spherical triangles (Refer to training notes on Astro) cot c = cos (a b) sec (a +b) cot P .. (1) If a b is small, cos (a b) 1. sec (a +b) may be expressed as cosec mean latitude as a and b are co latitudes. cot P may be expressed as cot chlong. Taking inverse of (1) above tan c = 1 x sin mean lat x tan chlong If c and chlong are small c = chlong sin mean lat Or Convergence = Chlong sin mean lat
Converted Meteorological Visibility (CMV) A value equivalent to an RVR which is derived from the reported meteorological visibility, as converted in accordance with the specified requirements in the CAR. Conversion of Reported Meteorological Visibility to RVR/CMV Horizontal visibility reported by the meteorological office could be different from the slant visibility observed by the pilot due to factors such as low lying haze and a smoke layer. The reported visibility has inherent limitations due to the fact that it is reported at a site that is removed from the point at which a pilot makes the approach to land and is expected to acquire the visual reference to continue the approach. An RVR is a better representation of the expected distance that the pilot may acquire visual cues on approach. As RVR and meteorological visibility are established differently, a ratio can be identified between the two. Effect of lighting intensities and background luminance play a role when establishing an RVR. In cases where the RVR is not reported, a pilot may derive RVR/CMV by using a mathematical conversion depending upon the type of approach lighting and day/night conditions. The RVR/CMV derived from the table below may be used by an operator to commence or continue an approach to the applicable DA/MDA. An Operator should ensure that a meteorological visibility to RVR conversion is not used for takeoff, for calculating any other required RVR minimum less than 800 m, for visual/circling approaches, or when reported RVR is available. When converting meteorological visibility to RVR in all other circumstances than those in sub-paragraph above, an operator should ensure that Table below is used: Note. If the RVR is reported as being above the maximum value assessed by the aerodrome operator, e.g. RVR more than 1500 metres, it is not considered to be a reported value for the purpose of this paragraph. The only time you can use converted visibility is: a) No RVR measurement available and either b) CAT I ILS, or c) Straight-in NPA
AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS 8.1 The aircraft shall be equipped to meet the following minimum equipment for RVSM operations:
8.1.1 Two independent altitude measurement systems shall be installed. Each system shall be composed of the following elements: a) Cross-coupled static source/system, with ice protection if located in areas subject to ice accretion; b) Equipment for measuring static pressure sensed by the static source, converting it to pressure altitude and displaying the pressure altitude to the flight crew; c) Equipment for providing a digitally encoded signal corresponding to the displayed pressure altitude, for automatic altitude reporting purposes; d) Static source error correction (SSEC)/Position Error Correction (PEC), if needed to meet the performance criteria of paras 3.3, 3.4 or 3.6 of Annexure II attached, as appropriate; and e) Signals referenced to a pilot selected altitude for automatic control and alerting. These signals will need to be derived from altitude measurement system meeting the criteria of this CAR, and in all cases, enabling the criteria of paras 8.1.3 and 8.2.6 to be met.
8.1.2 One secondary surveillance radar transponder (meeting TSO C112 standards) with an altitude reporting system that can be connected to the altitude measurement system in use for altitude keeping.
8.1.3 Airborne Collision Avoidance System (ACAS II) (meeting TSO C119b standards) to improve the safety level of flights operating within RVSM airspace.
8.1.4 An altitude alerting system that alerts the crew aurally and visually if displayed altitude deviates from the selected altitude by more than 300 feet (for aircraft for which application for type certification was made on or before April 9, 1997) or 200 feet (for aircraft for which application for type certification is made after April 9, 1997).
8.1.5 An automatic altitude control system shall be required which shall be capable of controlling altitude within tolerance band of 15 metres ( 50 feet) about commanded altitude, when operated in the altitude hold mode in straight and level flight under non turbulent, non gust conditions.