Genetic Chemical Trails

10 March 2014
21 Comments


A reader asks:
Another hot topic would be to ask the committee their thoughts on GMO foods, like our corn
and soy crops. Ask about the U.S. chicken that is soon going to be processed in China and then
sent back to us. China hates us! Worst idea ever!! Also, ask how these chemtrails are going to
affect our population. Being poisoned by various chemicals sprayed on us daily cannot be a
good thing. What will the effects be and what can we do to help ourselves?!

Says The Committee:

"Greetings, and we say we think little about food, we who do not eat. We know you who do eat,
think about it more, and should. This is good, as should be the taste. We know you might find
this humorous yet all is true, can you see?

People in China do not hate Americans; just as Americans do not hate Chinese; most Chinese
are not aware of Americas in general and think very little about the subject. Much the same
applies to America, few people there actively consider China and do not hate people of that
nation.

Genetic modifications occur at two levels; the arrangement of the molecular structure or the
substitution of the one molecular structure for another. It is also possible to change the
molecules and retain a similar structure function, yet humanity has not quite reached this point,
yet it is close.

The increase in yields is to earn more money by more efficient process; this is an illusion, just as
is money. The ability of Earth to produce sustenance for its inhabitants far exceeds demand; we
suggest all of the foods and ingredients regularly consumed around the world not necessary to
good body function, as an example.

Where the altered arrangement of the genetic coding does not alter the resulting substances
upon ingestion of the foods, there is no concern. This is the case; humanity has not modified the
genetic code of plants grown for consumption to the point of damaging human bodily operation.
This is possible, the point has not been reached and is very unlikely to be done, even as ability
and awareness of the ability become clear.

This is not to be mixed with additions of substances to foods; different from genetic code
change. This practice brings benefit and risk, as you all know well.

You must define for yourself what is a "chemtrail" and what is being sprayed on you; does this
mean exhaust discharge from turbine engines propelling aircraft? Yes, some chemicals are
released yet the concentrations are infinitesimally small when coming into contact with humans.
The greatest risk is for an airport dweller; and this risk remains low and undetected. There is
little need to be concerned for this; are there other chemicals discharged intentionally into the
Earth atmosphere for purpose? Yes, this has occurred and there are risks; these depend upon
both chemical and surface concentrations.

We suggest economic changes will cause the little of this activity to stop yet moreover, so little
takes place now, no concern should there be; be well."

Comments
cristina 10/03/2014 1:37pm
Hey ! Look who's back !!! We missed you and we are so happy you are back <3

cristina 10/03/2014 1:53pm
Dolores Canon says the same in an interview: that "chemtrails" have no effect over the population, the
way some people believe ... I find committee and Dolores information agreeing on many things - i like that
<3

britta 10/03/2014 2:15pm
Once again I find it fascinating that in the last 3 days, very specifically, intense discussions and viewing of
media on chemtrails and GMO have been front and center for me. Just today I was telling someone how I
found I cannot eat salsa type chips made of GMO corn without stomach upset but non GMO are fine. I
found this out by trial and error testing of myself. And knowing you were gone Patrick, I had no reason to
come over to the site. But I felt compelled to. And voila! VERY interesting. I am however still feeling that
the chemtrails are working far more damage overall to our weather patterns............hmmm. Thanks!

ajh 10/03/2014 2:31pm
nice one. i hope the response helped put to rest the fevered mind of the enquirer. conspiracy stuff like this
needs to stop in my humble opinion.

Eva Masini 10/03/2014 2:31pm
Wonderful; you're back!

Ahmed 10/03/2014 2:33pm
I always felt that fear of GMOs was exaggerated, normal I guess since people usually fear any major
change or technology they do not yet understand.

britta 10/03/2014 2:49pm
I recall a friend who was allergic to fish. She was having major issues with tomato's all of a sudden.
Interestingly enough..........she came across some information that some tomatos were being genetically
altered by the use of a gene from fish. Something to do with a blight on tomatos and this fish gene helping
to stop that (had to do with a correlation between the scales of fish and that gene that stopped that scale
disease etc). Anyhow, she went to eating organic tomatos and was fine. When we eat things that have
DNA of other stuff that MAY affect us in it and we are unaware....that is a problem in my mind.

Renie 10/03/2014 6:13pm
Hi Patrick!
What a surprise to see your blog today! I agree that the food allergy aspect may become the problem with
altered food products which, hopefully, will cause the demise of such practices. Unfortunately, there will
probably need to be a few multi-million dollar wrongful death lawsuits to get it to stop completely! Worry
and stressing about it is likely to cause more harm than actually eating such foods.

Melissa 11/03/2014 9:55am
"Worry and stressing about it is likely to cause more harm than actually eating such foods."

Very true statement in my opinion. You are right.

AD 11/03/2014 2:46pm
like commenter denis below, this post has me all riled up. i'll have to remind myself of your point, that
stressing over it may actually do more harm. thank you for that.

and thank you, patrick, as always.

Denis 10/03/2014 6:27pm
Patrick, nice to read you again and back on the front line with some stimulating thoughts on GMO and
chemtrail.
I will go along with the Committee view on chemtrail but will keep my opinion on GMO, after all they do
not eat, I do. I know too many of my friends struggling with diabetes and arthritis, I do not, have been
avoiding this junk for 25 years now. Or can these health problems be explained as a life contract.

Denis 11/03/2014 12:21pm
Yesterday after posting I asked myself: Why am I so uptight about this subject and upset after reading it?
Got some answers to that question:
1- I saw GMO has dangerous food, it is not but it is not healthy, it weakens your immune system in the
long term.
2- In a balance diet I would eat less than 1/3 of carbohydrate on a dish at meal time, so not enough to
make one sick but would not help maintain a healthy body.
3- Read the post, think about it, put the question to my gags, wait for an answer and then post.
4- I will not reintroduce GMO food in my diet but will be in a better position (perspective) to help my
friends in making the connection between good eating habits and health.
5- Thanks Patrick and Committee for the opportunity to revisit this subject.

Abe 10/03/2014 7:14pm
I'm more and more inclined to think; if you think it's gonna get ya, it's gonna get ya...and vice versa.

Hazra 12/03/2014 3:50pm
I feel this as well. I think how we feel about what we ingest is more significant than the actual food.
Feeling good about what I choose to eat is a good starting point for me.

Avid follower 11/03/2014 1:21am
Welcome back.so happy to follow again.just thought you should know you have been missed.

Veronica 11/03/2014 6:59am
Thank you!

ajh 11/03/2014 10:59am
peanuts and other things are enjoyed by some, bring allergies and even instant death to others. were
they ever tampered with? should they stop growing/harvesting them?
anything we eat has been tampered with to some extent for generations and just because something is
natural doesn't make it good.
who can claim to regularly eat stuff that grows/roams wild these days. not very many people. it goes back
to finding out what works or not for each person.
i wonder if its bias and expectation that certain things are 'bad' that brings about a negative placebo
effect.

Bee 11/03/2014 7:11pm
Perhaps it's not so much the GMO crops themselves, but the insects who harvest the crops that are
paying dearly for the chemical changes. Monarch butterflies, honey bee die-off, just two that come to
mind. And without those pollinators we can forget about GMO or non-GMO. There will be no crops to
spray.

Dr Laurie 12/03/2014 6:15pm
Patrick! Wonderful that you are "back in the saddle!" Committee, I love you guys, but I feel you have
missed the ball on this one. I don't want to be a "Negative Nellie," but I wanted to share an opinion. The
vast majority of genetic engineering of food is being done to 1) sell us pesticide-resistant plants (so you
can douse them with pesticides and not kill the plant), 2) to sell us the pesticides used to drench the
plants, 3) create plants that will not reproduce, so that the farmer has to re-purchase the seeds each
season, and 4) sell us plants with pesticides genetically built-in. I do not want food that has been
drenched with chemicals. I do not want food that has a pesticide (or a sequence of some animal or
insect's DNA) in it's genetics (that will kill my gut flora, for example). And guess who does the "research"
to show it's all safe - hmm, the very same companies that are making money on this. We all know how
well that kind of relationship has turned out for so many things!

I do not want companies to have a monopoly on seeds. Remember when you were a kid, and you took an
apple, let's say, and planted the seeds of this apple in a little pot, and got a little apple plant? Or a bell
pepper, etc.? You can't do that anymore - the genetic engineering has removed the reproductive ability of
plants - on purpose. How can this be good? Don't we have a right to grow our own food the old fashioned
way? Anyway, don't want to belabor this. Maybe you guys were just over-generalizing. Or using rose-
colored glasses : )

darlick 12/03/2014 11:08pm
http://www.annualreviews.org/eprint/9Ntsbp8nBKFATMuPqVje/full/10.1146/annurev.arplant.58.032806.10
3840?select23=Choose&

so they deliberately stop reproductive capability (reproductive isolation), but not for nefarious reasons
according to this (USA?) article.
not that i bothered much with it here in UK/Europe but i'm sure i've seen 'seed packets' for sale in loads of
shops. i hear those that bother report good results.

Sharon
13/03/2014 4:31pm
Welcome back Patrick! So good to see these posts! THANK-YOU!!