FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

MA Foreclosed Homeowner files Motion w/ Appeals Court

to Address Charges of Perjury.

Boston, MA, September 18, 2014 In a Motion filed today with the MA Appeals Court, wrongfully
foreclosed homeowner Mohan A. Harihar, addresses what are considered clear, and irrefutable
counts of perjury against Appellees US Bank NA, Wells Fargo NA, the Securitized Mortgage Trust
CMLTI 2006-AR1, Harmon Law offices PC, and the retained counsel Nelson Mullins LLP.
1


There are two (2) recent discoveries by the Appellant, filed via FAR application with the MA Supreme
Judicial Court, with a copy of the application on file with this Appeals Court. The first discovery reveals
fraudulent misconduct by Appellees US Bank NA, Wells Fargo NA, and the Securitized Mortgage
Trust CMLTI 2006-AR1, confirmed by certified Fraud Expert Lynn Syzmoniak.1 The second
discovery is interpreted as an admission to the existence of related misconduct by Appellee US
Bank NA, who after filing civil action against Citigroup for related infractions involving Appellee -
RMBS CMLTI 2006-AR1, is now included as part of a $1.125B settlement agreement.

While the collective body of evidence in this 3 year legal effort already includes multiple civil and
criminal infractions against these Appellees, the latest discoveries supporting the Appellants
consistent claims of perjury are clear, and irrefutable:

These discoveries along with the collective evidence/information on file, also supports the four (4)
elements of Perjury: Oath, Intent, Falsity and Materiality, punishable (at minimum) under
Massachusetts General Laws 268, Chapter 1.

While an update regarding mediation efforts by MA Attorney Generals Office is still pending, Mr.
Harihar has respectfully requested that the Court inform either the MA Attorney Generals Office or the
District Attorneys Office, of these latest developments.




For Further Media Information Contact : Mohan A. Harihar
Email: mo.harihar@gmail.com
Phone: 617.921.2526 (Mobile)

Follow on Twitter:
Mohan Harihar@Mo_Harihar




1
Scroll down to view Motion filed with the MA Appeals Court, in its entirety.
2


COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS

MIDDLESEX APPEALS COURT OF
THE COMMONWEALTH
DOCKET NO: 2013P1829

MOHAN A. HARIHAR

Appellant

vs.

US BANK NA,
WELLS FARGO NA,
HARMON LAW OFFICES PC, et al.

Appellees


MOTION APPELLANT REQUEST TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL
CITATION/AUTHORITY UNDER MA APPELLATE RULE 16(l); FILING OF
PERJURY CHARGES, M.G.L 268, Chapter 1

The Appellant, Mohan A. Harihar, respectfully submits to the
Court this request to file and accept a supplemental
citation/authority pursuant to MA Appellate Rule 16(l).

There are two (2) recent discoveries by the Appellant, filed
via FAR application with the MA Supreme Judicial Court, with a
copy of the application on file with this Appeals Court. The
first discovery reveals fraudulent misconduct by Appellees US
Bank NA, Wells Fargo NA, and the Securitized Mortgage Trust
CMLTI 2006-AR1, confirmed by certified Fraud Expert Lynn
Syzmoniak.
2
The second discovery is interpreted as an admission
to the existence of related misconduct by Appellee US Bank NA,
who after filing civil action against Citigroup for related
infractions involving Appellee - RMBS CMLTI 2006-AR1, is now
included as part of a $1.125B settlement agreement.

These recent discoveries, not known by the Appellant prior to
filing the Appellant Brief, clearly deserve to be included with
the collective arguments of the Appellant, and prior to

2
Please reference the filed FAR Application, on record with the
MA Appeals Court for additional detail.
3
decisions made pertaining to the protections sought in this
Appeal.

The Appellant respectfully requests that the Court include
these supplemental citations/authorities, already on file, with
the Appellants filed Brief.

These discoveries along with the collective evidence/
information on file, also supports the four (4) elements of
Perjury: Oath, Intent, Falsity and Materiality, punishable (at
minimum) under Massachusetts General Laws 268, Chapter 1.


It is this Appellants understanding, that lying to ANY Court
is still considered a serious offense. The continued stance by
Appellees that ZERO misconduct is associated with this matter
is a blatant lie. The documented evidence of perjury here is
clear, irrefutable, and must no longer be allowed to continue
without any accountability.

Since Appellees have either declined or ignored numerous
opportunities afforded to them to seek agreement in this
matter, the Appellant calls for Perjury charges to be brought
against ALL Appellees and their retained counsel. The Court is
additionally asked to update the MA Board of BAR Overseers/BAR
Counsel and supported complaints already on file against
Attorney David E. Fialkow and Attorney Peter Haley both of
Nelson Mullins Riley and Scarborough LLP, and also Harmon Law
Offices PC. An additional complaint is being filed against
Attorney Jeffrey Patterson of Nelson Mullins Riley and
Scarborough LLP.

If further detail is needed beyond what is already provided in
the FAR Application, the Appellant will call upon the
referenced testimony of the Fraud Expert to assist with
articulating the depth of misconduct including perjury.

Since criminal complaints have been recently updated with the
MA Attorney Generals Office, the Appellant respectfully
requests that this matter of Perjury now be addressed by either
the MA Attorney General, or the District Attorneys Office.
Pending the outcome of criminal mediation efforts by the MA
Attorney General, the additional counts of documented civil and
criminal misconduct are expected to be addressed upon filing
for new trial in the appropriate court(s), once that is
determined.

4

Thank you for your attention to this matter.






Respectfully submitted,



Mohan A. Harihar
Pro Se
168 Parkview Avenue
Lowell, MA 01852
617.921.2526 (Mobile)