Inpatients with chronic heart failure the session-rate of perceived exertion (RPE) provides autonomic and functional capacity changes superimposable to those observed with HR-based Training Impulses (TRIMPi) method. 20 patients with stable CHF were randomized to either aerobic continuous training (ACT) or aerobic interval training (AIT) for 12 weeks.
Original Description:
Original Title
Validation of Rate of Perceived Exertion-based Exercise Training in Patients With Heart Failure (1)
Inpatients with chronic heart failure the session-rate of perceived exertion (RPE) provides autonomic and functional capacity changes superimposable to those observed with HR-based Training Impulses (TRIMPi) method. 20 patients with stable CHF were randomized to either aerobic continuous training (ACT) or aerobic interval training (AIT) for 12 weeks.
Inpatients with chronic heart failure the session-rate of perceived exertion (RPE) provides autonomic and functional capacity changes superimposable to those observed with HR-based Training Impulses (TRIMPi) method. 20 patients with stable CHF were randomized to either aerobic continuous training (ACT) or aerobic interval training (AIT) for 12 weeks.
Validation of rate of perceived exertion-based exercise training in
patients with heart failure: Insights from autonomic nervous
system adaptations Ferdinando Iellamo a,b, , Vincenzo Manzi a , Giuseppe Caminiti a , Cristiana Vitale a , Michele Massaro b , Anna Cerrito a , Giuseppe Rosano a , Maurizio Volterrani a a Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientico San Raffaele Pisana, Roma, Italy b Dipartimento di Medicina dei Sistemi, Universit Tor Vergata, Roma, Italy a b s t r a c t a r t i c l e i n f o Article history: Received 16 March 2014 Received in revised form 29 May 2014 Accepted 24 July 2014 Available online xxxx Keywords: Heart failure Exercise training Rate of perceived exertion Baroreex sensitivity Heart rate variability Cardiac rehabilitation Background: Exercise prescription in cardiac patients is based on heart rate (HR) response to exercise. How to prescribe long-term exercise training outside medically-supervised settings also considering changes in individ- ual physical capacity over time is unknown. In this study we hypothesizedthat inpatients with chronic heart fail- ure (CHF) the session-rate of perceived exertion (RPE), a subjective-based training methodology, provides autonomic and functional capacity changes superimposable to those observed with HR-based Training Impulses (TRIMPi) method. Methods: Twenty patients with stable CHF were randomized to either aerobic continuous training (ACT) or aer- obic interval training (AIT) for 12 weeks. For each TRIMPi-guidedexercise session, the session-RPE was recorded. By this method, internal training load (TL) is quantied by multiplying the RPE of the whole training session, using the Borg CR10-scale, by its duration. Heart rate variability (HRV), and baroreex sensitivity (BRS) were assessed at baseline and at 3 weeks intervals. Results: Signicant correlations were found between TRIMP i and individual session-RPE, for both ACT and AIT (r = 0.63 to 0.81), (P b 0.05). The same occurred when ACT and AIT groups were pooled together (r = 0.72; P b 0.01). RR interval, HRV and BRS were signicantly and very highly correlated with weekly RPE- session (r 2 rangedfrom0.77 to 0.97; P b 0.001). Asignicant relationship between session-RPE and performance at the 6MWT was also found. Conclusions: Session-RPE is an easy-to-use, inexpensive and valid method for exercise prescription and health maintenance, consistent with objective physiological indices of training, that could be used for long-term phys- ical activity in patients with CHF. 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved. 1. Introduction Exercise training, is currently recommended in combination with pharmacological therapy in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) at a class 1 level [1,2]. It is well established that to be effective over time, exercise training should be maintained all-life long. This would imply the need of a continuous adaptation of exercise prescription, in terms of volume and intensity, especially in aging individuals. Current guidelines for exercise prescription commonly utilize HR as target tool, namely percentages of maximum heart rate (HRmax), and heart rate reserve (HRR) [3], or little bit more sophisticated measures that take into account also the lactate prole and individual internal training load [4]. These types of exercise prescription are usually done in clinical rehabilitation, centers, where patients are followed as in- or outpatients for a limited period of time. The issue thus exists as to how prescribing long-term exercise training taking into account: 1) the need of practis- ing regular physical activity outside medically-supervised settings and 2) the physiological aging processes with the attendant changes in indi- vidual physical capacity over time. Hence, a more practical and user- friendly method of exercise prescription would be mandatory. A simple method to quantify internal training load has been ad- vanced by Foster et al. [5] and referred to as session-RPE. By this method, internal training load (TL) is quantied by multiplying the whole training session rating of perceived exertion (RPE) using the Borg category ratio scale [6] (CR10-scale) by its duration. This prod- uct represents in a single number the magnitude of internal TL in ar- bitrary units (AU) and has been used and validated in athletes of different sport disciplines [5,7,8]. Borg's CR10 is considered a global indicator of exercise intensity including physiological (oxygen International Journal of Cardiology xxx (2014) xxxxxx Corresponding author at: IRCCS San Raffaele Pisana, Dipartimento di Medicina dei Sistemi, Universit di Roma Tor Vergata, Via Montpelier, 1, 00173 Roma, Italy. Tel.: +39 06 20900560; fax: +39 06 72594263. E-mail address: iellamo@med.uniroma2 (F. Iellamo). IJCA-18395; No of Pages 5 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.07.076 0167-5273/ 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved. Contents lists available at ScienceDirect International Journal of Cardiology j our nal homepage: www. el sevi er . com/ l ocat e/ i j car d Please cite this article as: Iellamo F, et al, Validation of rate of perceived exertion-based exercise training in patients with heart failure: Insights from autonomic nervous system adaptations, Int J Cardiol (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.07.076 uptake, HR, ventilation, beta endorphin, circulating glucose concen- tration, and glycogen depletion) and psychological factors [9] and as such it could be considered an accurate indicator of global internal TL. The RPE-session method might potentially be used by cardiac pa- tients for long-term, self-selected physical activity management. However, whether this easy-to-use training method would provide similar physiological adaptations as with the more usual HR- targeted training methodologies is patients with cardiac diseases is not known. We recently reported in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF), that exercise training programs guided by the TRIMPi method [10], a measure of internal TL which integrates in a single term both the vol- ume and intensity of exercise, i.e., the dose, by utilizing the relation- ship that exists between increase in HR and lactate production at individual level, induced a dose-dependent curvilinear response in sev- eral parameters exploring autonomic nervous systemcardiac regulation while simultaneously increasing functional capacity [10]. In the present study we sought to test the hypothesis that in the same patients, the session-RPE method provides similar autonomic ad- aptations and improvement in functional capacity as those observed with the more complex HR-based TRIMPi method. 2. Methods 2.1. Patients and study design We enrolled 20 consecutive male patients with post-infarction heart failure referred to our center for a cardiac rehabilitation program. Subject eligibility was determined at the initial screening visit. Patients were included in the study if they had left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) b 40% at echocardiographic examination, symptomatic heart fail- ure with functional New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II or III, clinical stability without hospital admission for HF in the previous 3 months, sinus rhythm and were on optimal medical treatment. Patients were excluded if they had unstable angina or recent acute myocardial infarction (less than 6 months), frequent atrial or ventricular premature beats, conduction defects, pacemaker, uncontrolledhypertension, history of severe kidney diseases, signicant pulmonary disease, severe lower extremities vascular or other dis- eases which could prevent a symptom limited exercise test, coexisting valvular disease and insulin-dependent diabetes. Medications were not altered throughout the study. The patients reported in the present study were the same of other investigations having different purposes [4,10]. Patients were randomly assigned on 1:1 basis to a 12-week aerobic continuous training (ACT) or aerobic interval training (AIT), both programmed according to the TRIMPi method [4,10]. For each TRIMPi-guided exercise session, the RPE-session ac- cording to Foster [5] was also recorded. To validate the session-RPE method we used the correlation between session-RPE responses with those observed with the TRIMPi method, the latter assumed as criterion validity. Reliability of the session- RPE method was assessed before the beginning of the study as intraclass correlation coefcient and coefcient of variation. The corresponding values were 0.96 and 1%, respectively. ACT and AIT programs guided by TRIMPi have been reported in detail elsewhere [4,10,11]. Shortly, for all patients, the exercise training program consisted of uphill treadmill walking, 2 days a week for the rst three weeks, 3 days a week for the sec- ond three weeks, 4 days a week for the third three weeks, 5 days a week for the last three weeks. Specically, patients in the ACT group walked continuously at a moder- ate training intensity, ~4560% of HRR for 3045 min, according to the training peri- odization. Patients in the AIT group warmed-up for 9 min with calisthenics and stretching exercise, before walking four 4-minute intervals by 24 times at ~75 80% of HRR, with active pauses of 3 min of walking at 4550% of HRR. The treadmill running velocity and inclination were adjusted continuously to ensure that every training session was carried out at the assigned HRR throughout the training period. Heart rates were recorded (5-second sampling rate) using short-range telemetry (Polar Team System, Polar Electro Oy, Kempele, Finland). Heart rates were recorded (5-second sampling rate) using short-range telemetry (Polar Team System, Polar Electro Oy, Kempele, Finland). All training sessions were performed in the morning as it was for the 6 minute walking test (6MWT) and cardiopulmonary exercise test performed before and after training. Data from 42 training sessions were collected for each patient. Each training session was supervised by a physical therapist. To allowfor TRIMPi-guided trainings, at baseline, all patients underwent progres- sive incremental treadmill test until volitional fatigue with monitoring of gas ex- change (Vmax 29 C, SensorMedics) using a modied Bruce protocol for the assessment of individual blood-lactate concentration prole, maximal HR and func- tional capacity. Capillary blood samples were taken from the earlobe each 3 min and immediately analyzed to assess blood-lactate concentration using an electroenzymatic technique (YSI 1500 Sport, Yellow Springs Instruments, Yellow Springs, OH, USA). The highest HR measured during the maximal incremental test was used as maximum reference value (HRmax ). Blood lactate concentrations were plotted against running speeds and fractional HR elevation (HR), and individual blood-lactate concentration proles were identied via exponential interpolation [4,7,8]. 2.2. RPE determination The subjective perception of effort as session-RPE and HR were assessed in each patient, for each training session, during 12 different weekly training periodizations. The session-RPE was determined by multiply the training duration (minutes) by ses- sion RPE. Individual RPE was assessed using the Borg 10-point scale modied by Fos- ter [5]. This product represents in a single number the magnitude of internal training load (TL) in arbitrary units (AU). Patients were educatedand familiarized withthe use of the Borg 10-point scale before the beginning of the experiment. To ensure that the perceived effort was referred to the whole training session rather than the most recent exercise intensity, each patient was asked to provide a rating of the overall difculty of the exercise bout, and each individual RPE was recorded about 30 min after completion of eachtraining session. We explained to the patients that we wanted a global rating of the entire training bout using whatever cues they felt to be appropriate. Each patient reported the perception of training session effort by indicating the number on the Borg 10-point scale. 2.3. Autonomic assessment BRS and Heart rate Variability (HRV) were investigated in each patient at baseline and 3 weeks apart on 4 subsequent occasions, according to the training periodization. BRS was assessed by means of the sequences technique [12] by analyzing simulta- neous recordings of non-invasive nger beat-by-beat BP (Finapres, Ohmeda 2350, Englewood, CO, USA) and the electrocardiographic trace from a precordial lead at a sampling rate of 250 Hz (REP 10, Marazza, Italy), as described in details previously [10,11]. HRV considered in the present study was the standard deviation of mean RR interval, inasmuch as this is the HRV parameter more consistently reported to be impaired in CHF. All assessments were made in the morning. After instrumenta- tion, the subjects lay supine for 15 min before experiments to relax in the room made dark and noiseless; thereafter, blood pressure (BP) was measured twice, 5 min apart by sphygmomanometer, and the measurements were averaged. After BP measurements, continuous data acquisition was performed for 10 min. After ANS assessment, on the same days, patients also performed a 6MWT, as a measure of functional capacity, according to standardized procedures [13]. All patients gave written informed consent to participate in the study, which was approved by the local Ethics Committee. 3. Statistics The results are expressed as means SD and 95% condence inter- vals (95% CI). Before using parametric tests, the assumption of normal- ity was veried using the ShapiroWilk W test. Pearson product moment correlation coefcients with linear regression analysis were calculated to determine whether there was a signicant relationship between session-RPE and the HR-based method. Qualitative magnitude of associations was reported according to Hopkins [14] as follow: trivial r b 0.1, small r b 0.1 to b0.3, moderate r 0.3 to b0.5, large r 0.5 to b0.7, very large r 0.7 to b0.9, nearly perfect r N 0.9 and perfect r = 1. To ex- press the doseresponse relationship between the exercise stimulus and changes in ANS parameters, correlations between the mean weekly session-RPE and ANS parameters at baseline, 3, 6, 9 and 12 weeks were estimated from a second order regression [10,11,15,16]. A multivariate between-within subject analysis of variance was conducted to assess the impact of the two different training programs on mean weekly session-RPE and ANS parameters. The effect size ( 2 ) was calculated to assess meaningfulness of differences. Effect sizes values of 0.01, 0.06, and 0.14 were considered small, moderate and large, respectively. Statistical signicance was set at P b 0.05. 4. Results Out of 20 patients, 16 completed the study: 2 patients in the ACT group and 2 in the AIT group discontinued the study. The reason for dis- continuation was in 1 case the development of permanent atrial brilla- tion, which prevented HRV and BRS assessment, and in 3 cases the willingness of the patient to discontinue in the study, not related to medical reasons. Baseline characteristics of the patients are reported in Table 1. There were no signicant differences between the ACT and 2 F. Iellamo et al. / International Journal of Cardiology xxx (2014) xxxxxx Please cite this article as: Iellamo F, et al, Validation of rate of perceived exertion-based exercise training in patients with heart failure: Insights from autonomic nervous system adaptations, Int J Cardiol (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.07.076 AIT groups with respect to all variables. All patients were on beta- blockers and medications were not altered throughout the study. Adherence to the specic training paradigm in each training session and compliance with the program was 100%, as inferred from the HR monitoring device that recorded, in addition to HR, the date of each training session. The TRIMPi- and session-RPE-based TL were calculated from 672 training sessions. Individual correlations were determined from 42 training sessions. Signicant correlations were found between TRIMP i and the individual session-RPE, for both ACT and AIT, with r values ranging from 0.63 to 0.81; (P b 0.05) (Table 2). Additionally, a signicant correlation between TRIMP i and session-RPE were ob- served when both ACT and AIT patients groups were pooled together (r = 0.72; P b 0.01; 95% CI = 0.54 to 0.84) (Fig. 1). The weekly session-RPE training load steadily increased during the training peri- od in both ACT and AIT groups (P b 0.001, 2 = 0.99). No signicant differences were found in mean weekly session-RPE TL score or in total session-RPE TL score between ACT and AIT group. The mean weekly RPE-session TL for ACT and AIT groups (weekly periodization) is shown in Fig. 2. As expected, a progressive increase in the distance walked was observed with the increase in RPE-session score frombase- line throughout the study, as observed with the TRIMPi method [4,7], with a signicant linear relationship between session-RPE score and the distance walked at the 6MWT (r = 0.85, P b 0.01; 95% CI = 0.38 to 0.97) (Fig. 3). RR interval, HRV, and BRS increased signicantly with increase in TL with both training protocols (P b 0.01, 2 = 0.65, 2 = 0.45, 2 = 0.52 for each variable, respectively) and were signicantly and very highly correlated with weekly RPE-session score with a second-order regression model (r 2 ranged from 0.77 to 0.97; P b 0.001), resembling a bell-shaped curve in the ACT and an asymptotic-shaped curve in the AIT groups, respectively (Fig. 4). 5. Discussion The main nding of this study is the demonstration that a simple method of training prescription/monitoring (i.e., session-RPE) provides superimposable outcomes, in terms of autonomic adaptations and func- tional capacity, as those provided by an objective, HR-based method (i.e., TRIMPi) in patients with CHF. The consistency of results during dif- ferent exercise modalities (i.e., ACT and AIT) suggests that the session- RPE method may be useful for long-term prescription of varying exercise-based rehabilitation programs in cardiac patients. The present study is the rst to apply the session-RPE based ap- proach to quantify internal TL in patients with CHF and to demon- strate signicant correlations between this subjective method of training monitoring and the more objective TRIMP i method, based on the HR and lactate responses to exercise, with individual correla- tions ranging from 0.63 to 0.81 between weekly TRIMP i and weekly session-RPE TL in both ACT and AIT groups. This nding is similar to those previously reported in endurance athletes of different sport disciplines [5,7,8], but, to date, there are no published studies validating this practical, simple, and inexpensive method of quanti- fying internal TL in cardiac patients undergoing exercise-based car- diac rehabilitation programs. Indeed, the session-RPE score resulted strongly related to TRIMP i , considered as reference standard in assessing training load in the present investigation. The regression equations describing the relation- ship between session-RPE with RR interval, HRV and BRS for ACT and AIT showed superimposable shapes with those using the TRIMPi meth- od [10] and indicate that to obtain benecial effects in ANS parameters, patients would need to accumulate at least 400 AU during the weekly training. From a practical point of view, to reach weekly training load in the range of 400 AU the exercise training program would need 4 days a week of training with a training session duration of 4050 min at RPE score from 3 to 5 on the Borg 10-point scale. Table 1 Baseline characteristics and medications. ACT AIT Age, y 62.6 9 62.2 8 BMI, kg/m 2 27.2 3 27.8 2 HR, bmin 1 55.6 5 60.9 5 SAP, mm Hg 110 10 113 11 DAP, mm Hg 70.0 7.6 76.9 5.9 Beta-blockers 8/8 8/8 ACE inhibitors 7/8 8/8 Diuretics 5/8 4/8 Aldosterone receptors blockers 8/8 8/8 Digoxin 1/8 1/8 Antiplatelet agents 8/8 8/8 Statins 8/8 8/8 Data are mean SDor number of patients. ACT, aerobic continuous training; AIT, aerobic interval training; HR, heart rate; SAP, systolic arterial pressure; and DAP, diastolic arterial pressure. Table 2 Individual correlations between RPE-based training load (session-RPE) and TRIMPi train- ing load in the continuous and intermittent training groups; all individual correlations were statistically signicant (P b 0.01). Continuous training Interval training Subjects TRIMP Subjects TRIMP S1 0.71 S1 0.71 S2 0.80 S2 0.66 S3 0.66 S3 0.69 S4 0.74 S4 0.81 S5 0.67 S5 0.68 S6 0.66 S6 0.77 S7 0.63 S7 0.64 S8 0.78 S8 0.70 Min 0.63 Min 0.64 Max 0.80 Max 0.81 Fig. 1. Relationship between session-RPE training load and TRIMP i method. Fig. 2. Comparison between the AIT (black bars) and ACT (open bars) groups in mean weekly session-RPE training load score. 3 F. Iellamo et al. / International Journal of Cardiology xxx (2014) xxxxxx Please cite this article as: Iellamo F, et al, Validation of rate of perceived exertion-based exercise training in patients with heart failure: Insights from autonomic nervous system adaptations, Int J Cardiol (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.07.076 This critical session-RPE training load may be utilized during the long-term, post-hospital, exercise training, to improve/maintain functional capacity and ANS parameters on the basis of a subjective, yet objectively validated, tool. This information might have a huge impact on training prescription in patient with CHF. Furthermore, the knowledge of threshold-like values grants practical guidelines to the development of a structured ergonomic exercise model in pa- tients with CHF. The perceived exertion method which uses RPE as a marker of training intensity within the TRIMP concept [5] has a physiological basis, inasmuch as it has been shown to be related to both HR and blood lactate markers of exercise intensity and to the percent of HR reserve (HRR) during steady-state running and to the time spent at different intensities corresponding to HR at lactate thresholds (2.5 and 4.0 mmolL 1 ) during continuous and interval running [17]. The present data provide support for the use of the session-RPE method as a subjective estimate of TL also during non-steady state exercise, like interval training. As such, this very simple method may be a useful technique for quantitating TL in a variety of training programs in cardiac patients. In this regard, the present data suggest that the session-RPE method may be representative, in a single term, of combined intensity and duration of training sessions (i.e., the dose of exercise) like the more sophisticated TRIMPi methodology. As RPE represents the patient's own perception of training stress, which can include both physical and psychological stresses, the session-RPE method may provide a valuable measure of internal TL, particularly in elderly patients with CHF and other cardiac diseases. It needs to be recognized and outlined that contributions document- ed at the level of a patient's group may not fully apply to each mem- ber of that group even when all patients of the exercising group are exposed to the same volume/intensity of physical activity adjusted for their own tolerance level. Hence, a group of CHF patients exercis- ing at, for example, 4070% HRR may be working at individually dif- ferent relative intensities. For this reason, exercise training programs based solely on percentage of HRR or HRmax are likely to impose variable cardiovascular and metabolic demands in CHF patients [18, 19] as a consequence of differences in individual internal training load. According to this concept, Scharhag-Rosenberger et al. [20] re- cently reported a wide inter-subjects variability in lactate response Fig. 3. Relationship between the sum of the weekly session-RPE training load scores and the distance walked at the 6 minute walking test. Black circles, ACT group, and black squares, AIT group. Fig. 4. Doseresponse relationship betweenweekly RPE-session score andautonomic cardiovascular parameters during interval training (left panel) and continuous training (right panel). HRV, heart rate variability; and BRS, baroreex sensitivity. *P b 0.05 versus pre-training baseline values. 4 F. Iellamo et al. / International Journal of Cardiology xxx (2014) xxxxxx Please cite this article as: Iellamo F, et al, Validation of rate of perceived exertion-based exercise training in patients with heart failure: Insights from autonomic nervous system adaptations, Int J Cardiol (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.07.076 in individuals with similar aerobic capacity while exercising at the same percentage of VO 2 max. This study ts well with the general consensus that exercise training should be individually tailored to the patient's clinical and functional status [21,22]. Obviously, our results should not be viewed as a substitute of the current guidelines, which utilize HR, VO 2 or TRIMP methodologies for exercise prescription. Exercise prescriptions based on these methods provided fundamental concepts on the effect of exercise training in cardiac patients. However, they are usually done in clini- cal rehabilitation centers and need expensive instruments and high professional skill. Rather, our results would add a further tool in the armamentarium of exercise prescription methods, particularly apt to long-term, out-of-hospital, physical activity of cardiac pa- tients, with a high benet also in terms of cost-effectiveness in com- parison to TRIMPi or HR and VO 2 -based training methodologies, especially in the elderly. 5.1. Study limitations The main limitation of the present investigation is the small sample size, furtherly penalized by unexpected drop-outs (e.g., willingness of 3 patients to discontinue the study, not related to medical reasons). This limitation is compensated, in part, by the high consistency of data be- tween RPE-session and TRIMPi methods and by the use of effect size analyses, which makes statistical analysis more robust, particularly in small samples. Also, we cannot comment on possible gender-related differences, since patients involved in the study were only males. Finally, our ndings cannot be extrapolated to CHF patients with preserved EF. In conclusion, the present study in CHF patients, along with pre- vious experience in healthy subjects, suggests that the session-RPE is an easy to use, inexpensive and valid method for exercise prescrip- tion and health maintenance, consistent with objective physiological indices of exercise training, that can be used for long-term, out-of- hospital, physical activity programs in patients with CHF. Further studies are clearly warranted examining the optimal weekly session-RPE to be provided in the setting of cardiac rehabilitation to maximize training responses in ANS parameters and in aerobic tness. Conict of interest The authors report no relationships that could be construed as a conict of interest. References [1] Piepoli MF, Corr U, Benzer W, et al. Secondary prevention through cardiac rehabil- itation: from knowledge to implementation. A position paper from the cardiac reha- bilitation section of the European Association of cardiovascular prevention and rehabilitation. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 2010;17:117. [2] Pina IL, Apstein CS, Balady GJ, et al. Exercise and heart failure. A statement from the American Heart Association Committee on Exercise, Rehabilitation, and Prevention. Circulation 2003;107:121025. [3] Carvalho VO, Mezzani A. Aerobic exercise training intensity in patients with chronic heart failure: principles of assessment and prescription. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 2011;18:514. [4] Iellamo F, Manzi V, Caminiti G, et al. Matched dose interval and continuous exercise training induce similar cardiorespiratory and metabolic adaptations in patients with heart failure. Int J Cardiol 2013;167:25615. [5] Foster C, Florhaug A, Franklin J, et al. A new approach to monitoring exercise train- ing. J Strength Cond Res 2001;15:10915. [6] Borg G, Hassmn P, LagerstrmM. Perceived exertion related to heart rate and blood lactate during arm and leg exercise. Eur J Appl Physiol 1987;56:67985. [7] Impellizzeri FM, Rampinini E, Coutts A, Sassi A, Marcora SM. Use of RPE-based train- ing load in soccer. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2004;36:10427. [8] Manzi V, D'Ottavio S, Impellizzeri FM, Chaouachi A, Chamari K, Castagna C. Prole of weekly training load in elite male professional basketball players. J Strength Cond Res 2010;24:1399406. [9] Morgan WP. Psychological components of effort sense. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1994; 26:10717. [10] Iellamo F, Manzi V, Caminiti G, et al. Doseresponse relationship of baroreex sensi- tivity and heart rate variability to individually-tailored exercise training in patients with heart failure. Int J Cardiol 2013;166:3349. [11] Manzi V, Castagna C, Padua E, et al. Doseresponse relationship of autonomic ner- vous system responses to individualized training impulse in marathon runners. Am J Physiol 2009;296:H173340. [12] Bertinieri G, Di Rienzo M, Cavallazzi A, Ferrari AV, Pedotti A, Mancia G. Evaluation of baroreceptor reex by blood pressure monitoring in unanesthetized cats. AmJ Phys- iol 1988;254:H37783. [13] American Thoracic Society. ATS statement: guidelines for the six-minute walk test. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002;166:1117. [14] Hopkins WG. A scale of magnitudes for effect statistics. Available at: http://www. sportsci.org/resource/stats/index.htm; 2002. [15] Iwasaki K, Zhang R, Zuckerman JH, Levine BD. Doseresponse relationship of the car- diovascular adaptation to endurance training in healthy adults: how much training for what benet? J Appl Physiol 2003;95:157583. [16] Okazaki K, Iwasaki K, Prasad A, et al. Doseresponse relationship of endurance train- ing for autonomic circulatory control in healthy senior. J Appl Physiol 2005;99: 10419. [17] Foster C, Hector L, Welsh R, Schrager M, Green MA, Snyder AC. Effects of specic ver- sus cross training on running performance. Eur J Appl Physiol 1995;70:36772. [18] Dwyer J. Metabolic character of exercise at traditional training intensities in cardiac patients and healthy persons. J Cardpulm Rehabil 1994;14:18996. [19] Beale L, Carter H, Doust J, Brickley G, Silberbauer J, Lloyd G. Exercise heart rate guide- lines overestimate recommended intensity for chronic heart failure patients. Br J Cardiol 2010;17:1337. [20] Scharhag-Rosenberger F, Meyer T, Gssler N, Faude O, Kindermann W. Exercise at given percentages of VO2max: heterogeneous metabolic responses between indi- viduals. J Sci Med Sport 2010;13:749. [21] Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee. Physical Activity Guidelines Advi- sory Committee Report, 2008. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2008. [22] Kokkinos P, Myers J. Exercise and physical activity. Clinical outcomes and applica- tions. Circulation 2010;122:163748. 5 F. Iellamo et al. / International Journal of Cardiology xxx (2014) xxxxxx Please cite this article as: Iellamo F, et al, Validation of rate of perceived exertion-based exercise training in patients with heart failure: Insights from autonomic nervous system adaptations, Int J Cardiol (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.07.076