Special Issue on Biological Engineering & Natural Science, May 2014

ISSN: 2347-6818 2014 | Published by The Standard International Journals (The SIJ) 6



AbstractThe objective of the article is to develop the control analytical methods on the basis of nonlinear
non-stationary models of the project object. An analytical solution allows analyzing the dependence of the
solution on the numerous parameters and using well-designed methods for optimal control synthesis.
Autonomy control system is placed on a managed object. Remote control is known as a control of the object
from the remote control point. The following are two approaches to analytical solution of Cauchy problem for
non-stationary systems: Finding a solution directly in the form of a series; Receiving the integral expression of
the solution, followed by placing it in a series.
KeywordsControl Analytical; Guidance Area; Guidance System; Implementation; Nonlinear Non-stationary.
AbbreviationsControl Object (CO).

I. INTRODUCTION
HE objective of the article is to develop the control
analytical methods on the basis of nonlinear non-
stationary models of the project object.
An analytical solution allows analyzing the dependence
of the solution on the numerous parameters and using well-
designed methods for optimal control synthesis [Petrov,
1987].
The system of equations that models the work of related
control system in the Cauchy normal distribution can be
shortly written in matrix-vector formula.
) , ( X F X t =

(1)
where =

is a status vector; , =

1
,

2
,

,
;

, is a scalar function, dependent on a vector variable

and external impacts, set as a function of time; (i=1,2,,n).
In the synthesis of multidimensional and multichannel
control systems, the main challenge is the control of multiple
coordinates of the Control Object (CO). For example, for a
solid body it is necessary to ensure the control of three
coordinates of the center of mass and the three angular
coordinates of the body rotation around the center of mass
[Dorf & Bishop, 2002]. This significantly complicates the
tasks of analysis and synthesis of nonlinear multidimensional
control systems and leads to the need to simplify the structure
of the mathematical model.
A natural solution for this kind of task is to simplify the
model by using the compensation of mutual dependencies
between CO coordinates with a specially organized links in
the control system [Alexandrov, 1984]. This solution was
proposed first by Voznesensky in 1934 and it was
implemented in relation to the regulation of turbines with
steam takeoff. Voznesensky summed up this theory of
connected self-regulation for all machines and any number of
adjustable parameters [Voznesensky, 1948].
According to Voznesensky Autonomy is ensured by
decoupling of signals that control the various channels of
the control system during external impacts that are formed by
a diagonal matrix. In more complex cases there are functional
relations between adjustable indicators that complicate
autonomous administration control.
Autonomy conditions that take into account functional
connections between regulators are known as autonomy
conditions according to Boksenbom-Hood [Romanov, 1970].
In the system of automatic control the change of one of the
coordinate of the status vector does not lead to a noticeable
change in the remaining coordinates when these conditions of
autonomy are implemented. Thus, the autonomy of channels
by BoksenbomHood is known as channels independence. In
a broad sense the control autonomy is understood as self-
control and is opposed to a remote control.
Autonomy control system is placed on a managed object.
Remote control is known as a control of the object from the
remote control point.
The following are two approaches to analytical solution
of Cauchy problem for nonstationary systems:
- Finding a solution directly in the form of a series
[Goursat, 1933];
- Receiving the integral expression of the solution,
followed by placing it in a series [Barabanov, 1975;
Bogoslovsky & Bogoslovsky, 2003];
T
*Research Assistance Professor, National Center for Aeronaut, King Abdul-Aziz City for Science and Technology, Riyadh, SAUDI ARABIA.
E-Mail: oalhatim{at}kacst{dot}edu{dot}sa
Dr. Omair Alhatim*
Analytical Modeling of the Guidance
Systems Parameters
Special Issue on Biological Engineering & Natural Science, May 2014
ISSN: 2347-6818 2014 | Published by The Standard International Journals (The SIJ) 7
II. METHODS OF DEFINITION OF AN
ANALYTICAL SOLUTION DIRECTLY IN
THE FORM OF A SERIES
Depending on the characteristics of specific task definition
there should be selected the corresponding mathematical
apparatus for its decision: expansion in the Taylor series,
Leibniz, Picard, Newton method or presentation of solutions
in the form of a series of Liouville.
2.1. Finding a Solution of the Cauchy Problem in the
Form of a Series of Taylor
Let the function , in the equation (1) allow the
expansion in the Taylor series
(
(

+
+

+
=

=
=
)! 1 (
1
)

(
0 !
)

)) ( , (
d
d
) , (
N
N
t t
O
N
k k
k
t t
t t
t t
k
t
k
t X F X F

(2)
The sum

+1
+1!
is called a residual member of the
Taylor series (2) and has one order with a value in the square
brackets. By selecting the number N so that a residual
member of the Taylor series can be ignored, for a given initial
conditions |
=

=
0
we get an approximate solution of
the Cauchy problem

= +
+

=
+ =
N
k k
k
t t
t t
t t
k
t
k
0 )! 1 (
1
)

)) ( , (
d
d
0
X F X X

(3)
where

(, ())|
=

- derivative of k-th degree of the

(, ()) at the point =

;
0
- initial condition of
decision at the point =

.
Expansion of the equation solution (1) in the Taylor
series (3) is possible only if there are no special points of the
function (, ()) on the integration interval. In addition,
the function (, ()) must be differentiable enough number
of times.
2.2. Expansion of Solution in Rows on a Positive Negative
Degrees of Another Function
An approximate method for the expansion is linear which
means replacing non-linear models by linear part of
expansions in series on the arguments degrees. Linearizion is
being carried out in the vicinity of travel, which is the most
common practice in the system operation. Such movement is
called a characteristic movement.
Let's say we know the solution for a certain type of
system (1) with degree nonlinearity = , . Then
each coordinate value

(, ) of vector of nonlinear non-

degree right parts , =
1
, ,

of another system
can be sometimes expanded in a series on decisions of first
system, on the function degree .
As a result we will have an infinite number of positive
and negative functions degrees
1

{ }

=

+ =
0
) 1
] ),
1
( [ ] ),
1
( [ )] ,
1
( [
n
n
t
kn
B
n
t
kn
A t
k
f X X X u u u

(4)


Where
}
+
=
) (

1
d
1
)]
1
( [
)
1
( ] ),
1
( [
2
1
t C
p
n
p
p p
k
f
i
kn
A
u
u u
t

X
;
}
=
) (

1
d )
1
( )]
1
( [ )] ,
1
( [
2
1
t C
p p
n
p p
k
f
i
kn
B u u u
t

X
.
The formula (4) represents the expansion of analytical
function

(, ) in an infinite series of positive and negative

coefficients of another analytical function =
1
that
allows minimizing original equation (1) to the equation with
degree nonlinearity.
This apparatus can be used to replace the original
stationary nonlinear system of the type (1) by a model with
degree nonlinearity. Degree non-linearity and nonlinear
coefficients are comfortable for the building of a analytical
solutions of differential equations in the form of a degree
series, for example by the method of uncertain factors.
2.3. Picard Method of Successive Approximations Building
Successive approximation was used by Picard for settlement
of one-dimensional equations [Goursat, 1933].
The Picard method of successive approximations with
respect to the system of equations (1) is the consecutive
substitution of obtained approximations for the building of a
next approximation
}

+ =
t
j n
x
j
x
i
F
i
x t
j i
x
0
d )
1 ,
, ,
1 , 1
, ( ) 0 ( ) (
,
t t

(5)
where

j-th approximation, and

( 1)
() (j-1)-th
approximation to the function

();
,0
=

(0);
i= 1, 2, , n; = 1, 2, .
A series (5) has the advantage of a series of Taylor (2),
because that it is applicable to the features (, ), which do
not have a continuous derivative.
2.4. Newton-Leibniz Method
In order to linearize, the expansion of a non-linear system
solution (1) in a series is normally made in the near the
stationary status. A steady state can be defined as a stationary
point in the space of the system phase coordinates. The
stationary point values derived from phase coordinates are
equal to zero by definition. Finding a stationary point is
limited to the solution of functional non-linear equation
, = 0.
After finding a stationary point, the solution of the
system of equations (1) can be received via a method, based
on the formula of NewtonLeibniz
} + =
t
0
d ) , ( ) 0 ( t t X F X X

(6)
Where (0) a stationary point.
2.5. Liouville Method
Let's take a look at integral matrix equation
}
+ =
b
a
t t t d ) ( ) , ( ) ( ) ( X K F X

(7)
For a similar one-dimensional integral equation Liouville
proposed a method of consistent substitutions [Whittaker &
Watson, 1963]. Series of Liouville in relation to the matrix
reporting (7) looks like this
Special Issue on Biological Engineering & Natural Science, May 2014
ISSN: 2347-6818 2014 | Published by The Standard International Journals (The SIJ) 8
+ } + =
b
a
t t t d ) ( ) , ( ) ( ) ( F K F X

=
} }
+
2
)
2
,
1
( )
1
, (
m
b
a
b
a
t
m
K K

}

b
a
m m m
m 1
d d ) ( ) ,
1
( F K

(8)
Non-stationary systems (systems with variable
coefficients) are referred to as the system with the linear
model coefficients which vary over time.
To a greater or lesser extent all real systems are non-
stationary. The reason why a control object is non-stationary
may be, for example, the change in aircraft mass because of
fuel consumption or aerodynamic parameters change because
of speed and altitude change. The task of defining the
parameters of object dynamics, taking into account their
change in time (non-stationarity) will be referred to as non-
stationary parameter task of dynamics.
Control systems of non-stationarity objects are referred
to as non-stationary control systems. The non-stationary
control systems include control systems whose control
algorithm parameters (including, stationary objects) are not
stationary. Such systems are referred to as non-stationary
control systems [Bogoslovsky & Bogoslovsky, 2003].
For example, there is a variability of the parameters of
control algorithm in self-configuration systems, where there
is an automatic configuration of settings for their optimal
values; self-guidance and telecontrol systems to yaw rate
deviation from the direction to the target. At the same time,
as a general rule, the non-stationary control algorithms
characteristics are tried to be submitted in the form of a
piecewise constant functions, to enable use of the methods of
synthesis of the stationary systems, i.e systems with constant
parameters.
To calculate the decision of non-homogeneous linear
differential equation with variable coefficients
) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( t t t t G X A X + =

(9)
You can apply a different modification of Liouville
formula (8). For this reason, let's imagine the equation (9) in
the integral form
}
+ =
t
t
t t

d ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( , , , X A F X
,
Where
}
+ =
t
t
t t

d ) ( )

( ) ( , , G X F ;
Following the logic of the work [D'Angelo, 1974],
similar to Liouville formula we get a series
+ } + =
t
t
t t

1
d )
1
( )
1
( ) ( ) ( , , , F A F X

+

2
1
d
2
d d

) (
1

) (
1

)
2
( )
1
(

=
} }

}
k
k
t
t
k
k
t
k
t
, , , ,
,
,
,
, , F A A A

(10)
In some particular cases a series (10) can be aggregated.
In these cases, the sum of a series (10) is the solution of
equation (9) in quadratures.
Liouville method has the advantage before other methods
of successive approximations:
- A common member of a series of Liouville equation
is determined independently of the other members of
this series;
- Series of Liouville equation satisfies the original
system of differential equations;
- If the sum of a series of Liouville equation can be
represented in the form of a finite number of
analytic functions, the series of Liouville equation is
a solution to the system of equations of the
quadratures.
2.6. Method of Implementation of a Specified Path
A typical traffic of the automatic control and stabilization
systems is a set movement, characterized by a specified
change in state vector. If
1
,
2
, ,

set changes of the

coordinates of a state vector, then they must be consistent
with the specified derivatives, i.e. , in accordance with the
formula (1) to respond to the functional equations.
)

,...,
2
,
1
, (
p p n
x x x t
i
F x =

(11)
Where ) ,..., , , (
2 1 p n
x x x t F
i
the functions that describe the
target behavior of coordinates of automatic adjustment
system; = 1, 2, . . . , .
As such method, it has been proposed to use the method
of quasistationary modeling in relation to the linear
differential equations of the first order. The entire trajectory
is conditionally divided into several sections; each section is
characterized by a well-known law of change of trajectory
parameters. In those areas of flight trajectory where
parameters or their derivatives are changed according to well-
known laws it is proposed to find the first approximation to
the system of linear differential equations of the first order in
the form of a solution of algebraic equations, consisting of
the right-hand parts of the original system of ordinary
differential equations with pre-defined laws of change of
some derivatives, and movement parameters as additional
perturbations.
All or some derivatives may be considered to be pre-set ,
in the left side of the original system of equations, or some of
the trajectory parameters (for example, it may be set the law
of change in height at sites of change in height, or the law of
change of course on the relevant trajectory sites).
Such method can be used to obtain transfer functions
with little changing in time coefficients (including,
parametric transfer functions), that allow to monitor dynamic
indicators of sustainability in time taking into account the
adverse combination of values of such parameters in some
points in time.
Let's take a closer look at potential for the application of
the method to the quasi stationary modeling of non-stationary
control parameters.
Usually the following areas of the flight object trajectory
are allocated when designing control systems:
- start area where flight speed is increased up to its
value in the next area;
- climb area;
- propulsion areas of flight at a specified height;
Special Issue on Biological Engineering & Natural Science, May 2014
ISSN: 2347-6818 2014 | Published by The Standard International Journals (The SIJ) 9
- areas of flak evasive maneuvers;
- area of guidance to the target;
Every portion of the trajectory has its own peculiarities
allowing making a partial certainty in stating a problem both
by the customer and the designer.
The main features of the dynamics of flight in the start
area are the change in the intense speed of flight and the low
efficiency of the aerodynamic controls (control surfaces). In
this section the aircraft movement has the appropriate
(statically stable) choice of aerodynamic configuration: the
center of gravity should be behind the center of application of
a driving force and forces of aerodynamic resistance to
movement. Therefore, a parametric equalization task in the
area of start is to direct the flight dynamics to identify the
thrust of engine, aerodynamic forces and weight changes for
known movement. The specific complexity of direct
dynamics problems solution is that the number of unknown
forces is usually greater than number of equations.
For stable heavy aircrafts at midcourse flight areas you
can take
z
z
m
e
~
o
z
m ~ 0. According to these assumptions the
simplified linearized equations of managed angular
movement in a vertical plane can look like this
G C V
S
C V
S
Y mV
t
mV
y y z

+ + + = o

e
o
o o 2 2
0
2 2 d
d ;
z z
z
z

m V
S
P m V
S
t
J o

o o
e
o o 2
0
2
2 2 d
d
+ + =
,

(12)
where m, V are respectively mass and speed of FO; is
an angle of attack; t time;
z
e 0 =

pitching speed;
0
Y
lifting force value at zero angle of attack ( = 0); the
density of the aircraft ambient air medium; S a surface area
of lifting force;

the proportionality factor in the formula

indicating dependences of the lifting force from the angle of
attack;

o the angle of deflection of the elevator;

y
C
o

proportionality factor in the formula, reflecting the
dependence of lifting force on the angle of deflection of the
elevator; G,

respectively the weight force and the

moment of inertia of the aircraft;
0
engine thrust;

z
m
o

proportionality coefficients in formulas reflecting
dependence of lifting force from the angle of attack and angle
of elevator.
In two equations for the linear dynamics in the general
case, it is necessary to find 7 forces. Since the decision in this
case is not the only one, it is necessary to set 5 of 7 unknown
forces. But there as much options of setting forces as possible
to make different combinations of the 7 elements in 5 without
repetition, namely
21
2
7 6
)! 5 7 ( ! 5
! 7
5
7
=

= C
.
The unambiguous assignment of the missing information
is possible only for a parametric problem of dynamics, where
production requires finding the aerodynamic coefficients of
the options that are common to operating forces. The number
of such common parameters in most applications can be
under some conditions kept to the number of equations of
dynamics.
For example, at the sites of setting height and midcourse
flight of heavy FO the angular speed of pitch is almost equal
to zero. So the law of elevator control, depending on the
angle of attack can be defined as the solution of the problem
of parametric dynamics by solving the system of equations
(12) with respect to two unknowns: relative to the angle of
attack o and angle of o of deflection of the elevator,
consistently solving the inverse problem of dynamics to
refine the values of the aerodynamic coefficients of the
aircraft, depending on the values of the angles o and o.
The system of algebraic equations (12) is a linear system
with variable coefficients, obtained from the linearization of
the original non-linear non-stationary system of equations. If
we go back to the original (up to linearization) equations
model, by replacing products of aerodynamic coefficients on
the angular parameters of linear functions
) (o o
o
o
y y
C C
;
) (
y y
C C

o o
o
o

;
) (o o
o
o
z z
m m
;
) (
z z
m m

o o
o
o

,
Then we can be obtaining as a result of a solution of
parametric dynamics task of the equations to determine the
non-linear dynamic driving of height control. Moreover, the
previously obtained solutions of linear parametric problem
can serve as an initial approximation to the solution of the
nonlinear parametric problem of dynamics.
Areas of flak maneuvers are usually accompanied by
related changes to the linear and angular coordinates, but are
overcome so quickly that the parameters of the mathematical
models do not have time to change significantly. Therefore,
the parametric problem of the dynamics at these sites is
reduced to the definition of time-varying parameters of the
transfer functions providing a given change of course and
altitude.
In the case of linear system the specific movement
coordinates
) ,..., , (
p 2 p 1 p n
x x x
that can be seen from the
equation (11), are the decision of the algebraic system of
equations with variable coefficients
) ( ) ( ) ( ) (
p p
t t t t G X A X + =

(13)
Using the solution of equations (11) or (13), you can
choose control system factors, enabling the movement by a
specified path.
Coordinate values, expressed through their deviationso x
from the specific movement
i i i
x t x x o + = ) (
p
, are set to the
original system of equations (1). As a result, we can obtain
equations in deviations from the set motion
) ,..., , , (
d
d
2 1 n i
i
x x x t Y
t
x
o o o
o
=

(14)
Equations (14), deviations from the target motion are
used to define constraints on the values of parameters based
on the stability conditions of the desired path.
All methods based on direct expansion of the solution of
equation (1) in the series, were obtained assuming that the
right side of this equation is numerically integrable, i.e. does
not go to infinity together with the integral of it anywhere in a
finite interval.
Special Issue on Biological Engineering & Natural Science, May 2014
ISSN: 2347-6818 2014 | Published by The Standard International Journals (The SIJ) 10
III. THE METHOD OF OBTAINING THE
INTEGRAL REPRESENTATION OF
SOLUTIONS FOR SELF-GUIDANCE
SYSTEMS AND TELECONTROL
In the last couple of years, due to the intense work on
creating unmanned aerial vehicles, devices of vertical takeoff
and soft landing on stationary and moving platforms,
hovercraft, winged aircrafts and other aircrafts of non-
traditional case design there is an urgent problem of
algorithms synthesis of non-stationary and nonlinear controls
which would allow to expand the area of control of such
facilities to the control system with a singular point
(telecontrol and self-guidance systems). The methods of the
solution expansion of the Cauchy problem in a series of
known functions to such objects are not applicable.
Getting analytical models of the trajectories of systems
with a singular point was made possible thanks to the
fundamental works [Barabanov, 1975; Bogoslovsky &
Bogoslovsky, 2003].
The guidance area can be implemented in two ways:
homing method and the method of telecontrol.
The method of homing respect to the angle sighting to
the target that is on a horizontal surface, is usually
characterized by four parameters: the initial valuesof height
and distance to the target, the height steep climb over the
initial position of the line of sight and missing the target. The
initial height of FO is determined, on the basis of conditions
of lack of obstacles in the path; the range is measured by skid
range finder, the height of steep climb and missing the
target by aerodynamic coefficients and the parameters of
control law.
Parametric homing problem is solved by the same sites
as in the flak evasive maneuver using transfer function
apparatus. Because of short duration all linearized model
motion coefficients except one vary little.
Homing respect to the angle sighting provides
proportionality of viewing angle to the first coordinate and
inverse proportionality of decreasing distance to the target
position. The angle of line of sight at homing connecting the
control object to the location of the object pointing is
measured from the axis parallel to the horizontal axis of the
Earth's coordinate system. As usual, the sign of the angle is
determined by the position of the line sighting relative to the
horizontal axis: if for the line of sight alignment with a
horizontal axis parallel to the horizontal axis in the earth
coordinate system, it would rotate counterclockwise, the
viewing angle is positive.
With telecontrol a control action is used as the angle line
of sight connecting the control object to the location of the
control point [Dobrolensky et al., 1963]. The control action is
formed in this case, depending on the increasing distance to
the remote location.
In the analysis and synthesis of guidance systems, the
model is used.
) (
) (
) ( ) ( ) (
1
1
t
t x
p t t p G B X A X + + =
t

(15)
where
t
p
d
d

differentiation operator;
|
|
|
|
|
.
|

\
|
=
nn n n
n
n
a a a
a a a
a a a

2 1
2 22 21
1 12 11
1
A
matrix of constant coefficients;

2 1
)) ( ),..., ( ), ( ( ) ( t x t x t x t
n
= X
status vector;
0
t t = t
taken with the opposite sign of the time remaining to the
singular point; t - current time of maneuvering;
0
t complete
time of maneuvering; ) (
1
t x first coordinate of the state
vector X(t); G(t) vector of external forces;
n j j
p b p
,..., 1
))} ( { ) (
=
= B
vector of linear differential operators
with constant coefficients.
Sign of defining parameter t when remote control is a
positive, and negative when homing.
Integral representation of solutions of the Cauchy
problem in the singular point of the trajectory (slip)
[Barabanov, 1975].
}
+

E =
i c
i c
pt
p p p e
i
t x d ) ( ) (
2
1
) (
1
0 1
0
1

t

(16)
where the function
) (
1
p

is defined by the formula

=
(

=
(

}
=
=
z n
k
k
k
z
p
z p
p W z d exp d (p) exp ) (
1
1
o

t
[
=

n
k
k
k
z z
1
) (
o
;
k k
z , o coefficients of the expansion in partial fractions
) (
1
p W
t
of the transfer function from the input respect to the
angle sighting to the exit for the flight altitude;

=

= =
n
k
k
k
z p p Q
p P
p W
1
1

) (
) (
) (
o
t
; ) ( ) (
1
p pQ p Q = ; ) (
1
p Q
polynomial not equal to zero for = 0.
System Response to initial condition for height
[Bogoslovsky & Bogoslovsky, 2003]
= ) , (
0
t t H
+ |
.
|

\
|

}
+

t
t

t
0
2 2
0
2
0
) 0 (
d
1

) (
1 1
2
1

) 0 (
t
H
p p
p p
e
i t
t
t
H
i c
i c
pt

}
+

+

+
i c
i c
pt
p
p W t p
e
i t
t t
t
H
d
) (
1 1
2
1

) 0 (
1 0
2
0
2
0
2
0 t
t

(17)
The integrals (16) and (17) are calculated in a power
series expansion in positive or negative powers of the
arguments. Typically, the expansion in series of negative
powers are used for large values of the parameters
0
t , t andt,
a series of positive powers for small and medium values of
these parameters. At the same time qualitative notion of
large, medium and small are endowed with
quantitative content in the process of modeling a particular
object of management.
Equation (16) allows to find the parameter values by
acceptable value of miss, and equation (17) allows to find the
parameter values by acceptable value of a steep climb (the
maximum deviation from the initial position of line of sight
Special Issue on Biological Engineering & Natural Science, May 2014
ISSN: 2347-6818 2014 | Published by The Standard International Journals (The SIJ) 11
t
0
) 0 (
t
H

. If in the end terms for missing and steep climb

take into account dependency of factors of transfer functions
from the time (parametric transfer function), then you can
take into account the impact of those dependencies on the
coordinates of missing and steep climb.
You may notice that the formula (10) allows you to
select parametric fractional transfer function, suitable for use,
and in the particular point: with t(0) function (17) turns
into the function (16), as
1 )
1
(
0

t t
p
.
Analytical dependencies can be used when addressing
the challenges of parameters identification of dynamics on
the field tests and causes of failures in the process of an
aircraft acceptance testing.
IV. CONCLUSIONS
An overview of analytical methods for the solution of the
Cauchy problem for nonlinear and non-stationary systems of
governance has been provided.
The methods of construction of analytical dependence of
the parameters on the parameters of the control system of
unmanned aerial vehicles on typical sections of the trajectory
have been stated.
The formulas for determining miss and steep climb
using parametric transfer function have been given.
REFERENCES
[1] E. Goursat (1933), Course of Mathematical Analysis.
Differential Equations, M.L.: STTI, Vol. 2, P. 2, Pp. 287.
[2] I.N. Voznesensky (1948), On the Regulation of Machines with
a Large Number of Adjustable Parameters, Papers of the
Leningrad Polytechnic Inst., No. 2.
[3] Y.P. Dobrolensky, V.I. Ivanova & G.S. Pospelov (1963),
Automatics of Managed Shells, Textbook for Students / Under
rev. of G.S. Pospelov M.: Defence State Publishing House, Pp.
548.
[4] E. Whittaker & T.G. Watson (1963), The Course of Modern
Analysis, In 2 Parts: P. 1. Basic Operations of Analysis. M.:
Physical and Mathematical State Publishing House, Pp. 343 P.
2. Transcendental Functions. M.: Fizmatgiz, 1963. Pp. 515.
[5] V.A. Romanov (1970), Automatic Control in Complex
Facilities and Complexes: Tutorial, L.: LPI, Pp. 134.
[6] G. D'Angelo (1974), Linear Systems with Variable
Parameters. Analysis and Synthesis, Translated from English,
Editors: N.T. Kuzovkov, M.: Mechanical Engineering, Pp. 287.
[7] A.T. Barabanov (1975), Methods of Studying of Systems with
Variable Coefficients, Methods for Analysis of Nonlinear
Systems of Automatic Control, Editors: P.A. Nelepin M.:
Science, Pp. 448.
[8] Y.S. Alexandrov (1984), On the Stability of Motion of
Control Systems with Automatic Digital Computer, Workshop
on Dynamics of Management, Control and Organization of
Movement of Autonomous Objects, LSU, Pp. 2835. Analysis
and Optimization Synthesis of Control Systems, Editors: A.A.
Voronova & I. A. Orurka. M.: Science, Pp. 344.
[9] Y.P. Petrov (1987), Synthesis of Optimal Control Systems
with Incompletely known Perturbing Forces: Tutorial. L.:
LSU, Pp. 292. V.A. Podkuchaev (2002), Analytical Methods
of Automatic Control Theory, Physical and Mathematical
Literature, Pp. 256.
[10] R. Dorf & R. Bishop (2002), The Modern System of
Governance, Yunimediastail, Pp. 831.
[11] S.V. Bogoslovsky & V.S. Bogoslovsky (2003), Nonstationary
Automatic Control of Dynamic Objects: Tutorial, SPb.:
SPbSUAI, Pp. 328.
Dr. Omair Alhatim Ph.D. Saint Petersburg
State University for Civil Aviation, Thesis
(Advancement of diagnostic techniques for
gas turbine engine friction units by analyzing
lube oil impurities. Is currently Research
Assistant Professor National Center for Jet
Engine, King AbdulAziz City for Science &
Technology in Riyadh. Attended and
participated several conferences. He has
published 7 scientific papers. Member of the Standards and
Metrology Organization in Saudi Arabia, a member of the
arbitration highest award to honor inventors in Saudi Arabia.
1. Al-Hatim O.M. principles for decision support systems for the
diagnosis of complex dissipative structures in transport
Interuniversity thematic collection of scientific works / Al-Hatim
OM State University of Civil Aviation "Problems, maintenance and
improvement of transportation systems." Volume 13, 2008. P.63-65.
2. Al-Hatim O.M. Physico-chemical model of gas turbine engine
diagnostics / Al-Hatim O.M. / / International Journal of Applied and
Fundamental Research " 7 for 2009. P.41-42. (Scientific
International Conference "Fundamental and applied research.
Education, Economics and Law", 6-13 September 2009, Italy
(Rome, Florence).)
http://www.rae.ru/upfs/pdf/2009/07/2009_07_36.pdf
3. Al-Hatim O.M. Mathematical model of technical diagnostics GTE
/ Al-Hatim OM / / Journal "Modern high technologies" 9 in 2009.
P.93-94. (Correspondence e-conference "Fundamental and Applied
Problems of Mathematics," August 15-20, 2009.)
http://www.rae.ru/snt/pdf/2009/09/2009_09_30.pdf
4. Al-Hatim O.M. diagnostic classification systems of friction units
of gas turbine engine / Al-Hatim OM Magazine "Scientific and
technical statements STU" Science and Education " 3 (84),
2009.S.177-180.
http://www.spbstu.ru/public/ntv/2009/content_sce_2009_3.PDF