Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
How We Know Global Warming is Real
Tapio Schneider Skeptic; 2008; 14, 1; Research Library pg. 31 How We Know Global ming is Real The Science Behind Human-induced Climate Change ATMOSPHERIC CARBON DIOXIDE ooncentrations are higher today than at any time in at least the past 650,000 years. They are about 35% higher than before the industrial revolution, and this increase is caused by human activities, primarily the burning of fossil fuels. Carbon dioxide is a greenhouse gas, as are methane, nitrous oxide, water vapor, and a host of other trace gases. They occur naturally in the atmosphere. Greenhouse gases act like a blanket for infrared radiation, retaining radiative energy near the swface that would otherwise escape directly to space. An increase in atmospheric ooncentrations of carlx>n dioxide and of other greenhouse gases augments the natural green- house effect; it increases the radiative energy available to Earth's swface and to the lower atmosphere. Unless oompensated for by other processes, the increase in radiative energy avail- able to the swface and the lower atmosphere leads to warming. This we know. How do we know it? How do we know c.tJon dioxide CCIIW06ilb&tloi have lnc18&11d? The ooncentrations of carlx>n dioxide and other greenhouse gases in atmospheric samples have been measured oontinuously since the late 1950s. Since then, carlx>n dioxide concentrations have increased steadily from about 315 parts per mil- lion (ppm, or molecules of carlx>n dioxide per million molecules of dry air) in the late 1950s to about 385 ppm now, with small spatial variations away from major sources of emissions. For the more distant past, we can measure atmospheric ooncentrations of greenhouse gases in bubbles of TAPIO SCHNEIDER andent air preserved in ice (e.g., in Greenland and Antarctica). Ice oore reoords currently go back 650,000 years; over this period we know that carlx>n dioxide ooncentrations have never been higher than they are now. Before the industrial revolution, they were about 280 ppm, and they have varied naturally between about 180 ppm during ice ages and 300 ppm during warm periods (Fig. 1). Concentrations of methane and nitrous oxide have likewise increased since the industrial revolution (Fig. 2) and, for methane, are higher now than they have been in the 650,000 years before the industrial revolution. How do we know the I11C18&18 In c.taon dioxide concenbatloi Is C8UI6d by human actlvltlel? There are several lines of evidence. We know approximately how much carlx>n dioxide is emitted as a result of human activities. Adding up the human sources of carbon dioxide- primarily from fossil fuel burning, cement pro- duction, and land use changes (e.g., deforesta- tion}-one finds that only about half the carlx>n dioxide emitted as a result of human activities has led to an increase in atmospheric ooncentra- tions. The other half of the emitted carlx>n diox- ide has been taken up by oceans and the bios- phere-where and how exacdy is not oomplete- ly understood: there is a "missing carlx>n sink." Human activities thus can account for the increase in carbon dioxide concentrations. Changes in the isotopic composition of carbon dioxide show that the carbon in the added car- bon dioxide derives largely from plant materi- als, that is, from processes such as burning of WWW.SKEPTIC.COM Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 400,000 Today 300,000 200,000 100,000 YEARS AGO biomass or fossil fuels, which are derived from fossil plant materials. Minute changes in the atmospheric concentration of oxygen show that the added carbon dioxide derives from burning of the plant materials. And concentra- tions of carbon dioxide in the ocean have increased along with the atmospheric concen- trations, showing that the increase in atmos- pheric carbon dioxide concentrations cannot be a result of release from the oceans. All lines of evidence taken together make it unambigu- ous that the increase in atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations is human induced and is primarily a result of fossil fuel burning. (Similar reasoning can be evoked for other greenhouse gases, but for some of those, such as methane and nitrous oxide, their sources are not as clear as those of carbon dioxide.) How can auch a mklute III110U1t of carbon cloxlde affect ndatMt energy balln:e? Concentrations of carbon dioxide are meas- ured in parts per million, those of methane and nitrous oxide in parts per billion. These are trace constituents of the atmos- phere. Together with water vapor, they account for less than 1% of the volume of the atmosphere. And yet they are crucially important for Earth's climate. Earth's surface is heated by absorption of solar (shortwave) radiation; it emits infrared Clongwave) radiation, which would escape almost directly to space if it were not for 350 Figure 1: Carbon dioxide concentrations In I Antarctica over 300 400,000 years.
"The graph combines ;;;: ice core data with recent 0 samples of Antarctic air. '6 250 c: The 100,QOO.year ice age
<U cycle is clearly recognizable. (.) (Data sources: Petit et al. 1999; Keeling and Whorf 200 2004; GLOBALVIEW-C02 2007.) 0 water vapor and the other greenhouse gases. Nitrogen and oxygen, which account for about 99% of the volume of the atmosphere, are essentially transparent to infrared radia- tion. But greenhouse gases absorb infrared radiation and re-emit it in all directions. Some of the infrared radiation that would otherwise directly escape to space is emitted back toward the surface. Without this natural greenhouse effect, primarily owing to water vapor and carbon dioxide, Earth's mean sur- face temperature would be a freezing -1 F, instead of the habitable 59F we currently enjoy. Despite their small amounts, then, the greenhouse gases strongly affect Earth's tem- perature. Increasing their concentration aug- ments the natural greenhouse effect. How do Increases In greenhouse gas coocenbatlons lead to surface temperature Increases? Increasing the concentration of greenhouse gases increases the atmosphere's "optical thickness" for infrared radiation, which means that more of the radiation that eventually does escape to space comes from higher levels in the atmosphere. The mean temperature at the level from which the infrared radiation effectively escapes to space (the emission level) is determined by the total amount of solar radiation absorbed by Earth. The same amount of energy Earth receives as solar radia- tion, in a steady state, must be returned as infrared radiation; the energy of radiation VOLUME 14 NUMBER 1 2 0 0 8 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. depends on the temperature at which it is emitted and thus detennines the mean temperature at the emission level. For Earth, this temperature is -1 F-the mean temperature of the surface if the atmosphere would not absorb infrared radiation. Now, increasing greenhouse gas concentrations implies raising the emission level at which, in the mean, this temperature is attained. If the tempera- ture decreases between the surface and this level and its rate of decrease with height does not Concentrations of Greenhouse Gases from 0 to 2000 C. E. Figure 2--Greenhouse Gases Then and Now The IPCC report caption for this graph reads: "Atmospheric concentrations of important long- lived greenhouse gases over the last 2,000 years. Increases since about 1750 are attrib- uted to human activities in the industrial era. Concentration units are parts per million (ppm) or parts per billion (ppb), indicating the number of molecules of the greenhouse gas per million or billion air molecules, respectively, in an atmospheric sample." (Graph is FAQ 2.1, Figure 1 from the IPCC Working Group 1 report. Data combined and simplified from Chapters 6 and 2 of report.) :0 :350 " z E c. c. ~ 3 0 u - Carbon Dioxide (C02) --Methane (CH4) -Nitrous Oxide (N20) -1800 -1600 -= 1400 :0 - c. c. - 1200 :i - u -=1000 -=800 0 500 1000 Year 1500 2000 Figure 3-How We Know the Globe Is Wannlng Evidence from multiple sources corroborate the fact that the Earth is warming. The IPCC report caption for this graph reads: "Published records of surface tem- perature change over large regions. Koppen (1881) tropics and temperate latitudes using land air tempera- ture. Callendar (1938) global using land stations. Willett (1950) global using land stations. Callendar (1961) 60N to 60S using land stations. Mitchell (1963) global using land stations. Budyko (1969) Northern Hemisphere using land stations and ship reports. Jones et al. (1986a,b) global using land sta- tions. Hansen and Lebedeff (1987) global using land stations. Brohan et al. (2006) global using land air temperature and sea surface temperature data is the longest of the currently updated global temperature time series (Section 3.2). All time series were smoothed using a 1 ~ i n t filter. The Brohan et al. (2006) time series are anomalies from the 1961 to 1990 mean ( 0 C). Each of the other time series was originally presented as anomalies from the mean tem- perature of a specific and differing base period. To make them comparable, the other time series have been adjusted to have the mean of their last 30 years identical to that same period in the Brohan et al. (2006) anomaly time series. (Graph is Figure 1.3 from the IPCC Working Group 1 report. u r/) 0.4 0.2 0 l-0.2 ~ -0.6 -0.8 1840 ,., ,. ; ~ i ~ Global Temperature Time Series - callendar 1938 -- Willett1950 - callendar 1961 Mitchell1963 - Buc:tyko 1969 --- Jooes et al. 1986 - HC11Se11 and Lebedeff 1987 - Brol1<r1 et al. 2006 1860 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 Year WWW.SKEPTIC.COM 2000 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. FigUre 4 and 5-Two Cheers for the Greenhouse Effect Outgoing Longwave Radiation 235Wm 2 Some global warming is necessary in order to make the Earth habitable for creatures like us. These two graphics show how it works. The IPCC caption reads: "Estimate of the Earth's annual and global mean energy balance. Over the long term, the amount of incoming solar radiation absorbed by the Earth and atmosphere is balanced by the Earth and atmosphere releasing the same amount of outgoing longwave radiation. About half of the incoming solar radi& tion is absorbed by the Earth's surface. This energy is transferred to the atmosphere by warming the air in contact with the surface (thermals), by evap- otranspiration and by longwave radiation that is absorbed by clouds and green- house gases. The atmosphere in turn radiates longwave energy back to Earth as well as out to space." Source: Kiehl and Trenberth (1997). (Graphics are FAQ 1.1, 1.3, Rgure 1 from the IPCC Report.) VOLUME 14 NUMBER 1 change substantially, then the surface temperature must increase as the emis- sion level is raised. This is the green- house effect. It is also the reason that clear summer nights in deserts, under a dry atmosphere, are colder than cloudy summer nights on the U.S. east coast, under a relatively moist atmosphere (Figs. 4 and 5). In fact, Earth surface temperatures have increased by about 1.3F over the past century (Fig. 3). The temper- ature increase has been particularly pronounced in the past 20 years (for an illustration, see the animations of temperature changes at www.gps.cal- tech.edu/ -tapio/ discriminants/ anima- tions.html). The scientific consensus about the cause of the recent warm- ing was summarized by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) in 2007: "Most of the observed increase in global average temperatures since the mid-20th cen- tury is very likely due to the observed increase in anthropogenic greenhouse gas concentrations. . .. The observed widespread warming of the atmos- phere and ocean, together with ice mass loss, support the conclusion that it is extremely unlikely that global cli- mate change of the past 50 years can be explained without external forcing, and very likely that it is not due to known natural causes alone." The IPCC conclusions rely on cli- mate simulations with computer mod- els (Fig. 6). Based on spectroscopic measurements of the optical proper- ties of greenhouse gases, we can cal- culate relatively accurately the impact increasing concentrations of green- house gases have on Earth's radiative energy balance. For example, the radiative forcing owing to increases in the concentrations of carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide in the industrial era is about 2.3 Watts per square meter. (This is the change in radiative energy fluxes in the lower troposphere before temperatures have adjusted.) We need computer models 2 0 0 8 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. to translate changes in the radiative energy bal- ance into changes in temperature and other cli- mate variables because feedbacks in the cli- mate system render the climate response to changes in the atmospheric composition com- plex, and because other human emissions (smog) also affect climate in complex ways. For example, as the surface and lower atmosphere warm in response to increases in carbon diox- ide concentrations, the atmospheric concentra- tion of water vapor near the surface increases as well. That this has to happen is well estab- lished on the basis of the energy balance of the surface and relations between evaporation rates and the relative humidity of the atmosphere (it is not directly, as is sometimes stated, a conse- quence of higher evaporation rates). Water vapor, however, is a greenhouse gas in itself, and so it amplifies the temperature response to increases in carbon dioxide concen- trations and leads to greater surface warming than would occur in the absence of water vapor feedback. Other feedbacks that must be taken into account in simulating the climate response to changes in atmospheric composition involve, for example, changes in cloud cover, dynamical changes that affect the rate at which temperature decreases with height and hence affect the strength of the greenhouse effect, and surface changes (e.g., loss of sea ice). Current climate models, with Newton's laws of motion and the laws of thermodynamics and radiative transfer at their core, take such processes into account. They are able to reproduce, for example, Earth's seasonal cycle if all such processes are taken into account but not, for example, if water vapor feedback is neglected. The IPCC's conclusion is based on the fact that these models can only match the observed climate record of the past 50 years if they take human-induced changes in atmospheric composition into account. They fail to match the observed record if they only model natural variability, which may include, for exam- ple, climate responses to fluctuations in solar radiation (Fig. 7). Climate feedbacks are the central source of scientific (as opposed to socio-economic) uncer- tainty in climate projections. The dominant source of uncertainty are cloud feedbacks, which are incompletely understood. The area covered - by low stratus clouds may increase or decrease as the climate warms. Because stratus clouds are The World In Global Climate Models Rain 1111111111 II/IIIII/II /III/IIIII! /l/l//1/1/l !111/111111 //III/IIIII ///1111/111 ////IIIII/I Figure 6--The History of Climate Models. The IPCC caption reads: "The complexity of climate models has increased over the last few decades. The additional physics incorporated in the models are shown pictorially by the different features of the modelled world." (Graphic is Rgure 1.2 from the IPCC Report.) low, they do not have a strong greenhouse effect (the strength of the greenhouse effect depends on the temperature difference between the sur- face and the level from which infrared radiation is emitted, and this is small for low clouds); how- ever, they reflect sunlight, and so exert a cooling effect on the surface, as anyone knows who has WWW.SKEPTIC.COM Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Global and Continental Temperature Change Global i! f 10 0.0 1 0.5 ~ ~ ~ ~ 1900 1950 Year ---- observations 2000 - models using only natural forcings i! b 11.0 i I! 0.5 t 0.0 i 1900 Global Land 1950 Year models using both natural and anthropogenic forcings 2000 1900 Global Ocean 1950 Year 2000 Figure 7-Giobal and Continental Temperature Change. The IPCC caption reads: "Comparison of observed continental- and glob- al-scale changes in surface temperature with results simulated by climate models using either natural or both natural and anthro- pogenic forcings. Decadal averages of observations are shown for the period 1906-2005 (black line) plotted against the center of the decade and relative to the corresponding average for the period 1901-1950. Lines are dashed where spatial coverage is less than 50%. Darker shaded bands show the 5 to 95% range for 19 simulations from five climate models using only the natural forcings due to solar activity and volcanoes. Lighter shaded bands show the 5 to 95% range for 58 simulations from 14 climate models using both natural and anthropogenic forcings." (Graphic is Rgure SPM.4 from the IPCC Report.) VOLUME 14 NUMBER 2 0 0 8 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. been near southern California's coast on an over- cast spring morning. If their area coverage increases as greenhouse gas concentrations increase, the sutface temperature response will be muted; if their area coverage decreases, the sutface temperature response will be amplified. It is currently unclear how these clouds respond to climate change, and climate models simulate widely varying responses. Other major uncertain- ties include the effects of aerosols (smog) on clouds and the radiative balance and, on timescales longer than a few decades, the response of ice sheets to changes in temperature. Uncertainties notwithstanding, it is clear that increases in greenhouse gas concentrations, in the global mean, will lead to warming. Although climate models differ in the amount of warming they project, in its spatial distribution, and in other more detailed aspects of the climate response, all climate models that can reproduce observed characteristics such as the seasonal cycle project warming in response to the increas- es in greenhouse gas concentrations that are expected in the coming decades as a result of continued burning of fossil fuels and other human activities such as tropical deforestation. The projected consequences of the increased concentrations of greenhouse gases have been widely publicized. Global-mean sutface tempera- tures are likely to increase by 2.0 to 11.5F by the year 2100, with the uncertainty range reflect- ing scientific uncertainties (primarily about clouds) as well as socio-economic uncertainties (primarily about the rate of emission of green- house gases over the 21st century). Land areas are projected to warm faster than ocean areas. The risk of summer droughts in mid-continental regions is likely to increase. Sea level is projected to rise, both by thermal expansion of the warm- ing oceans and by melting of land ice. Less widely publicized but important for poli- cy considerations are projected very long-term climate changes, of which some already now are unavoidable. Even if we were able to keep the atmospheric greenhouse gas concentration fixed at its present level-this would require an imme- diate and unrealistically drastic reduction in emis- sions--the Earth sutface would likely warm by another 0.9-2.5F over the next centuries. The oceans with their large thermal and dynamic inertia provide a buffer that delays the response of the sutface climate to changes in greenhouse gas concentrations. The oceans will continue to warm over about 500 years. Their waters will expand as they warm, causing sea level rise. Ice sheets are thought to respond over timescales of centuries, though this is challenged by recent data from Greenland and Antarctica, which show evidence of a more rapid, though possibly tran- sient, response. Their full contribution to sea level rise will take centuries to manifest. Studies of climate change abatement policies typically end in the year 2100 and thus do not take into account that most of the sea level rise due to the emission of greenhouse gases in the next 100 years will occur decades and centuries later. Sea level is projected to rise 0.2-0.6 meters by the year 2100, primarily as a result of thermal expan- sion of the oceans; however, it may eventually reach values up to several meters higher than today when the disintegration of glaciers and ice sheets contributes more strongly to sea level rise. (A sea level rise of 4 meters would submerge much of southern Florida.) Certainties and Uncertainties While there are uncertainties in climate projec- tions, it is important to realize that the climate pro- jections are based on sound scientific principles, such as the laws of thermodynamics and radiative transfer, with measurements of optical properties of gases. The record of past climate changes that can be inferred, for example, with geochemical methods from ice cores and ocean sediment cores, provides tantalizing hints of large climate changes that occurred over Earth's history, and it poses challenges to our understanding of climate (for example, there is no complete and commonly accepted explanation for the cycle of ice ages and warm periods). However, climate models are not empirical, based on correlations in such records, but incorporate our best understanding of the physical, chemical, and biological processes being modeled. Hence, evidence that temperature changes precede changes in carbon dioxide con- centrations in some climate changes on the timescales of ice ages, for example, only shows that temperature changes can affect the atmos- pheric carbon dioxide concentrations, which in tum feed back on temperature changes. Such evi- dence does not invalidate the laws of thermody- namics and radiative transfer, or the conclusion that the increase in greenhouse gas concentrations in the past decades is human induced. T WWW.SKEPTIC.COM Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Authors <.(Contributors lk w..m H. Calvin is a theoretical neurobiologist, Affiliate Professor of Ps)l::hiatry and Behavioral Sciences at the University of Washil't00 in Seattle. He is the author of a dozen books, mostly for general readers, about brains and EM>Iution. The last is A Brief History of the Mind: From Apes to Intellect and Be}ood. Out in paper- back is A Brain for All Seasons: Human Evolution and Abrupt Climate Charge, about paleoanthropology, paleoclimate, and considerations from neurobiology and evolutionary biology, which won the 2002 Phi Beta Kappa book award for science. His book with Derek Bickerton, UfWUB ex Machina: Reconc/lif'W Darwin and Chomsky with the Human Brain, is about the evolu- tion of structured His latest book from which this excerpt carne is Global Fever: How to Treat Climate Charge, which combines his studies of climate chaf'e and human action. Dr. Katlwyn Coe has a Ph.D. in cultural anthropology and evolutionary biology and is affiliated with both the College of Public Health and the Arizona cancer Center at the University of Arizona. Coe has over thirty years' experience conductill! health research with African Americans, Hispanics/ lstinos, and American Indians. She has been Primary Investigator on a number of funded projects and is cur- rently Primary Investigator of the large regional Southwest American Indian Cancer Network want, housed at the Inter Tribal Council of Arizona. She has published a book and numerous aJ1i. cles on culture. lk Sid DeutKh earned a Ph.D. from Polytechnic Unillersity and was ated with the Electrical fll!ineerill! department there from 1951-1972, after which he was at Rutgers University, Tel-Aviv University , and finally the Unillersity of South Aorida in Tampa. Dr. Deutsch is the author of Models of the Nervous System, Return of the Ether. Are You Conscious, and Can You Prove It?, and is co-author of Biomedical Instruments: Theory and Design and Understandif'W the Nervous System: An rllneeritW Perspective. He is a Fellow of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics fll!ineers and of the Society for Information Display. IMAGE AND/OR TEXT OMITTED PER PUBLISHER ProQuest Alee Fltedernlla1 is a systems teet for a large international transport& tion company, has a B.S. in biology with a chemistry /physics minor from the University of Illinois, Champaign- Urbana, and is a free-lance science writer and member of the Northern california Science Writers Association. Dr. Steve Fuler is Professor of Sociology at the Unillersity of Warwick. Originally trained in history and philoso- phy of science, he is most closely associated with the feild of "social epistemology" which is also the name of a joumal he founded and the title of the first of his fifteen books. He is cur- rently President of the Sociology seo- tion of the British Association for the Advancement of Science. Dr. Nomwo Levitt is a topologist in the Mathematics Department of Rutgers Unillersity. He is the author of Prometheus Bedeviled and co-author of Higher Superstition, in addition to many other articles on popular comprehen- sion of science. In recent years, he has spoken on and off campus at George Mason law School, the New School University, the Institute for Advanced Study, City College of New York, the Foundation for the Future, Williams College, BBC Radio, the New Engiand Skeptics, and the Institute of Ideas (among others). His current prot- ects include pieces on the Sokal Affair and the penetration of pseudoscience into popular accounts In addition, he is editill! a compendium on the Science Wars and writill! an underWadUate text on the foundations of analysis. Dr. Craig T. Palmer is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Anthropology at the University of Missouri at Columbia. He received his Ph.D. in cultural anthropology from Arizona State University in 1988. He performs fieldwork in Newfoundland, Canada, and has published widely on religion, sexual aggression, and ecology. Steven Rivkin has written for the Society of American Magicians (MUM) and in Vibrations for the Psychic Entertainers Association (PEA). Last year he wrote a series for the PEA called "Bob Nelson's Corner. He lately has been writing for Oracle, a newer magic journal for storytelling magicians and spirit magic. All his magic writings have been under his old performinmg name of Stefan Dardik. He collects and studies specialized magic his- tory and stlance history. For over 25 years Steve Salerno has perpetrated investigative and fea- ture journalism for publications includill! Harper's, The New }brk Times Mcgazine, Esquire, PIB}boy. The Street Journal, The WashifWton Post. Magazine and others. His book, SHAM: How the Self-Help Movement Made America Helpless (Crown), explored the $10 billion American self- help movement He is now workill! on a book about vanity's role in American life. He welcomes comments on his blog. www.shamblog.com. Dr. Taplo Schneider is a professor of Environmental Science and Engineering at Caltech, where he con- ducts research on the dynamics of the Earth climate and of the global cir- culation of the atmosphere; global mate changes; turbulence and turbu- lent transport in the atmosphere and oceans. His research, which uses simulations with climate models of various complexity, and analyses of observational data, focuses on the development of theories of the turbu- lent fluxes of heat, mass, and water vapor that maintain the global-scale climate. Such theories help us under- stand the changes in the atmospheric climate that occurred over the Earth s history and that are likely to occur in the future. Dr. Reed L. Wadley is Assistant Professor of Anthropology at the versity of He has been Research Fellow at the Inter- national Institute for Asian Studies (Netheriands) and Associate Scientist with the Center for International Forestry Research (Indonesia). His pub- lications include "lethal Treachery and the Imbalance of Power in Warfare and Feudill!" (Journal of Anthropo/ogical Researr:h, 2003), "Sacred forest, hunt- ill!. and conservation in West Kalimantan, Indonesia" (Human Eco/qfy; 2004) with Carol Colfer, and "Religious Scepticism and its Social Context: An Analysis of lban Shamanism" (Anthf'OPO/CIieal Forum, 2005) with Af'ela Pashia and Craig Palmer. REGULAR CONTRIBUTORS .JemPaU Buquat is a free lance illus- trator whose work appears in mag& zines and newspapers in Europe and in the USA. For the last five years he has also been workill! with companies to help them dellelop visual trainill! pro- grams. His clients include Canal+, Air Inter Le Credit Suisse. He is a frequent contributor to the Journal de Geneve and the Los Arge/es Times. Tim Callahan is religious editor of SKEPTIC. His books include Bible Prophecy: Failure or Fulfillment? and Secret Origins Of the Bible, both published by Millennium Press. He has also researched the environmental movement, and his article "Environmentalists Cause Malarial (and other myths of the 'Wise Use' movement)" appeared in The Humanist. Dr. Hanlet Hall, MD, is a retired Air Force flight surgeon and family physician living in Puyallup, Washington. She has researched extensively alternative medicine and has written about it in SKEPTIC, Skeptical Inquirer, and The Scientific Review of Alternative Medicine, as well as on the Quackwatch website. The SkepDoc can be reached at harriet.hall@comcast.net. Pat Unse is an award winning illus- trator who specialized in film indus- try art before becoming one of the founders of the Skeptics Society, SKEPTIC, and the creator of JR. SKEPTIC magazine. As SKEPTIC'S art director she has created many illustrations for both SKEPTIC and JR. SKEPTIC. She is co-editor of the Encyclopedia of Pseudoscience. Daniel Loxton was a professional shepherd for nine years before he became editor of JUNIOR SKEPTIC. He illustrates and authors most of the current JUNIOR SKEPTIC material. He is currently working with Pat Linse to create the Baloney Detection Series-a richly illustrated kids' science book series based on JUNIOR SKEPTIC. MacArthur "genius award" recipient ....,_ Rlnll is a professional magi- cian, author, lecturer, and investigator of unusual claims. His books include The Mask of Nostradamus, The Faith Healers, RimRam/, The Truth About Uri Geller, Houdini-His Ufe and Art. and Corjurirg He has recently po..tllished An Enc}dopedia of Claims, Frauds, & Hoaxes of the Occult & Supematuta/. He to numerous humanist and scientific organizations and was recent- ly wanted an honorary doctorate. Mr. Randi has logged over 100,000 miles a year in his research into pseudo- science. Isaac Asimov called Randi "a national treasure, and Cali Sagan said of him: "We may disagree with Randi on specific points but we ignore him at our peril." Dr. Mchaal Sllelna is po..tllisher of SKEPnc, Director of the Skeptics Society, and a monthly columnist and Contribut- ill! Editor of Scientific American. He is author of Matters, The Science of Good and evil, In Darwin's Shadow: The Ufe and Science of Alfred Russel The Borderlands Of Science, How Beliel!e, History. and Beliel!e For 20 years he tqTt ps)dlOI- ogy, the history of science, and the his- tory of ideas at Occidental College, California State UnNersity, Los Af'eles, and Glendale College.