http://jmmoralejo.wordpress.com/2014/02/18/the-tiger-and-the-dragon-of-asian-economy/ The Tiger and The Dragon of Asian Economies Fastest emerging leaders of the world, fastest growth and development. Massive sourcing hubs for all kind of industries. Especially for apparels/garments, their rivalry is famous across the globe. Both of them have abundance of resources, capital, skilled human resources, technology and globalization. Both them have stabilized government and economy. Both them have strong demand, infrastructure, affordability, state of the art technology and attitude. These characterizes China and India, the two monsters in Asia. Since the late 1970s China has moved from a closed, centrally planned system to a more market-oriented one that plays a major global role - in 2010 China became the world's largest exporter. Reforms began with the phasing out of collectivized agriculture, and expanded to include the gradual liberalization of prices, fiscal decentralization, increased autonomy for state enterprises, creation of a diversified banking system, development of stock markets, rapid growth of the private sector, and opening to foreign trade and investment. China has implemented reforms in a gradualist fashion. In recent years, China has renewed its support for state-owned enterprises in sectors it considers important to "economic security," explicitly looking to foster globally competitive national champions. The Chinese government faces numerous economic challenges, including: (a) reducing its high domestic savings rate and correspondingly low domestic demand; (b) sustaining adequate job growth for tens of millions of migrants and new entrants to the work force; (c) reducing corruption and other economic crimes; and (d) containing environmental damage and social strife related to the economy's rapid transformation. Economic development has progressed further in coastal provinces than in the interior, and by 2011 more than 250 million migrant workers and their dependents had relocated to urban areas to find work. One consequence of population control policy is that China is now one of the most rapidly aging countries in the world. India is developing into an open-market economy, yet traces of its past autarkic policies remain. Economic liberalization measures, including industrial deregulation, privatization of state-owned enterprises, and reduced controls on foreign trade and investment, began in the early 1990s and have served to accelerate the country's growth, which averaged under 7% per year since 1997. India's diverse economy encompasses traditional village farming, modern agriculture, handicrafts, a wide range of modern industries, and a multitude of services. Slightly more than half of the work force is in agriculture, but services are the major source of economic growth, accounting for nearly two-thirds of India's output, with less than one-third of its labor force. India has capitalized on its large educated English-speaking population to become a major exporter of information technology services, business outsourcing services, and software workers. In 2010, the Indian economy rebounded robustly from the global financial crisis - in large part because of strong domestic demand - and growth exceeded 8% year-on-year in real terms. The outlook for India's medium-term growth is positive due to a young population and corresponding low dependency ratio, healthy savings and investment rates, and increasing integration into the global economy. India has many long-term challenges that it has yet to fully address, including poverty, corruption, violence and discrimination against women and girls, an inefficient power generation and distribution system, ineffective enforcement of intellectual property rights, decades-long civil litigation dockets, inadequate transport and agricultural infrastructure, limited non-agricultural employment opportunities, inadequate availability of quality basic and higher education, and accommodating rural-to-urban migration. In the end, India and China have brought along several changes. The production process has been modified and higher quality goods are produced at lower costs, increasing companies' revenues and reducing the prices faced by the consumers. There is also a competition for jobs as white-collar jobs are moving offshore. The existent competition between domestic and foreign countries as well as between Westerners and Middle East workers will constitute an engine of growth for the world. Companies will focus on producing higher quality, cheaper goods while people will invest more education in order to possess advantages with respect to others. Overall, this will be positive for every country. The two Asian giants India and China have shown several developments in different sectors from the early times, which eventually contributed towards a steep rise in the economy of the respective countries. However, when it comes to comparing the economy of both the countries, China usually stays on the top. The economists points out, Chinese Government constantly implies new, which certainly has an impact in the first rising economy. Both the countries are putting in their best efforts to analyze their core economic strengths and gradually establish themselves as the superpower in the World Economy. Comparing several factors, China and India stands at more or less at the same juncture of economic development. Both the countries are looking forward to approach constructive developmental strategies to increase their effectiveness. While, China has opted for manufacture-led growth strategy, India finds it better to stick to the service based development models for an enhanced growth in economy. Apart from these strategies, overall encouragement in labour and manpower is required which would further be effective in combating unemployment challenges.