This document provides heuristics, or rules of thumb, for the design and operation of various types of process equipment. It includes heuristics for fluid handling equipment like fans, compressors, pipes, pumps and valves. It also includes heuristics for conveying particulate solids, cooling towers, heat exchangers, evaporators, storage tanks, drums, reactors, distillation columns and gas absorption. The heuristics address topics like typical component efficiencies, pressure drops, flow rates, temperature approaches and design parameters. The document emphasizes that these heuristics can be useful if updated regularly, but should not be relied on blindly without consideration of the specific application.
This document provides heuristics, or rules of thumb, for the design and operation of various types of process equipment. It includes heuristics for fluid handling equipment like fans, compressors, pipes, pumps and valves. It also includes heuristics for conveying particulate solids, cooling towers, heat exchangers, evaporators, storage tanks, drums, reactors, distillation columns and gas absorption. The heuristics address topics like typical component efficiencies, pressure drops, flow rates, temperature approaches and design parameters. The document emphasizes that these heuristics can be useful if updated regularly, but should not be relied on blindly without consideration of the specific application.
This document provides heuristics, or rules of thumb, for the design and operation of various types of process equipment. It includes heuristics for fluid handling equipment like fans, compressors, pipes, pumps and valves. It also includes heuristics for conveying particulate solids, cooling towers, heat exchangers, evaporators, storage tanks, drums, reactors, distillation columns and gas absorption. The heuristics address topics like typical component efficiencies, pressure drops, flow rates, temperature approaches and design parameters. The document emphasizes that these heuristics can be useful if updated regularly, but should not be relied on blindly without consideration of the specific application.
when appropriate to keep them relevant, time-tested heuris- tics rules based upon experi- ence, also referred to as rules of thumb, can be useful for the design, specifying and operation of several kinds of equipment used in process plants. The first and foremost heuris- tic rule is that the engineer should not shy away from using heuristics and the second rule is that he or she should not rely blindly upon them. Presented here are a wide range of heuristics, classified according to major kinds of typical process equip- ment or activity. Fluid handling Fans are suitable for raising gas pres- sures moderately (for instance, by 3%, or by 12 in. of water); for higher pressures up to about 40 psig, blowers are suitable; for yet higher pressures, employ compressors (however there is overlap between the operating ranges of blowers and compressors) Typical polytropic efficiencies for large centrifugal compressors are about 76 to 78%; rotary compressors normally have efficiencies around 70%, except for liquid-sealed ones, which have efficiencies around 50% For pipe lines of diameter D in inches, typical fluid velocities and pressure drops are as follows: (a) for pump discharge (liquid): (5 + D/3) ft/s, and 2 psi/100 ft; (b) at pump suction (liquid): (1.3 + D/6) ft/s and 0.4 psi/100 ft; (c) for steam or gas, 20D ft/s and 0.5 psi/100 ft Control valves function best if the pressure drop through them is at least 10 psi Single-stage centrifugal pumps can operate at rates of up to about 5,000 gal/min, (and to maximum heads of 500 ft); multistage pumps can oper- ate to about 11,000 gal/min. Conveying of particulate solids Screw conveyors: (a) Can transport solids that are abrasive or sticky (b) Typical incline is about 20 deg (c) Most are 150 ft or less in length (d) With a conveyor of 12-in. diam- eter, throughputs of up to about 3,000 ft 3 /h are feasible; typically, screw rotation rates are up to about 60 rev/min (e) Power consumption relatively low Bucket elevators: (a) Vertical transport of abrasive or sticky materials is feasible (b) Typically, speeds can reach 100 to 300 ft/min; at 100 ft/min, bucket elevators with 20X20-in. buckets can convey about 1,000 ft 3 /h Drag type conveyors: (a) Can convey for relatively short distances in any direction (b) Have high power requirements (c) Typical speeds are 30 ft/min (for, e.g., fly ash) to 250 ft/min (for grains) Pneumatic conveyors: (a) They offer high capacity (b) Usually employed with convey- ing distances of 400 ft or less (c) Can transport simultaneously to several destinations (d) Operate under vacuum or low pressures (e) Typical conveying-gas velocities are 35 to 120 ft/s Cooling towers In full-scale units, air saturation can reach 90% To minimize pressure drop (ordinar- ily a maximum of 2 in. water), em- ploy an open-structured material for the tower fill Typical water circulation rates are 1 to 4 gal/min per square foot, whereas the air rates are 1,300 to 1,800 lb/h per square foot, or 300 to 400 ft/min Countercurrent induced-draft tow- ers, which can cool water to about 2F above the wet-bulb temperature, are the most prevalent version of tower used in the process industries For a given service, the required size (volume) of a given tower is a func- tion of the difference between the wet-bulb and the exit temperatures; the smaller the difference, the larger the required volume Evaporation losses are typically 1% of the circulation for every 100F of cooling range. Windage or drift losses in mechanical-draft towers typically amount to 0.1 to 0.3%. To keep salt from building up exces- sively, it is typical to blow down 2.5 to 3% of the circulation Heat exchangers; refrigeration In a shell-and-tube exchanger, the tube side is for corrosive, fouling, scaling and/or high-pressure fluids; Feature Report 44 CHEMICAL ENGINEERING WWW.CHE.COM OCTOBER 2006 Engineering Practice Alejandro Anaya Durand, Josseline Alarid Miguel, Gabriel Gallegos Diez Barroso, Marco Alejandro Leon Garcia, and Juan Pablo Sierra Angeles National Autonomous University of Mexico Heuristics Rules for Process Equipment If applied with thought and care, heuristics like these can make life much easier during project scoping, process design, equipment specification and similar tasks the shell side is for viscous and/or condensing fluids Typical minimum temperature ap- proaches are 20F with normal cool- ants, or 10F or less with refrigerants Ordinarily, the maximum heat- transfer area for shell and tube heat exchangers is about 5,000 ft 2
When refrigerating to temperatures below about 80F, it is customary to use cascades of two or more re- frigeration stages Evaporators The maintaining of a suitable tem- perature gradient (for instance, about 45F) can minimize film-re- lated efficiency losses. From an efficiency standpoint, about 250 Btu/(h)(ft 2 ) is a suitable overall coef- ficient of heat transfer In countercurrent evaporation sys- tems, a suitable temperature ap- proach between the inlet (hot) and output (cold) streams is about 30F. In multistage operation, the typical minimum value is 10F In a well-designed evaporator sys- tem, it should be possible to achieve heat recoveries of more than 75% Storage tanks For less than 100 gal, it is common practice to use vertical tanks on legs For between 100 and 10,000 gal, horizontal tanks on concrete sup- ports are commonly used For beyond 10,000 gal, consider ver- tical tanks on concrete foundations Liquids that are subject to breathing losses may conveniently be stored in tanks with floating or expansion roofs, for conservation Although the amount of material inventoried is highly plant-specific, many process plants specify 30 days worth of capacity, for raw materials and products alike Drums Liquid drums usually are horizontal Drums for gas-liquid separation are vertical A length-to-diameter ratio of 3 is considered optimal; but in practice, the ratio for drums commonly falls between 2.5 and 5.0 In liquid-liquid separation, reflux drums are usually kept about half full, with holdup time of about 5 min. (or 5 to 10 min if the drum liq- uid is fed to a downstream separa- tion tower) For entrainment removal, mesh pads of 4 to 12 in. thickness can achieve 99% removal; a thickness of 6 in. is widely used Reactors In stirred tank reactors, it is prefer- able to maintain a liquid level that is approximately equal to the tank diameter Common motives for conducting batch reactions, in stirred-tank re- actors, are: the daily production rate is relatively low; reaction times are relatively long; particular process parameters, such as the feed rate or the vessel temperature, must be programmed during the course of the reaction An array of continuous stirred-tank reactors in series (four or five, for in- stance) is in many cases the system of choice for slow reactions of liquids and slurries Tubular reactors are attractive for short-residence-time reactions (sec- onds or minutes), high throughputs, and reactions that require a rela- tively large amount of heat transfer Distillation and gas absorption Generally speaking, distillation tends to be the most economical method for liquid-liquid separation; more so, for instance, than liquid-liquid extrac- tion or crystallization. Flashing can be more economical than distillation, but is more limited by physical prop- erties of the mixture The well-known simple equation for relative volatility relative volatil- ity = (vapor pressure of more vola- tile component)/(vapor pressure of less-volatile component) is valid only for ideal mixtures If the system is ideal and there are only two components, the McCabe-Thiele method offers a good approximation to the number of equilibrium stages The most common determinant of the column operating pressure is either the temperature of the avail- able condensing medium (in many cases, cooling water at about 100 to 120F) or the maximum allowable reboiler temperature (for instance, 366F for 150-psig steam) For many separations, the optimal reflux ratio is 1.2 times the mini- mum reflux ratio In many cases, the economically op- timal number of trays equals twice the minimum number of trays Reflux pumps should be oversized by about 25% From a maintenance standpoint, tray spacings of about 20 to 24 in. are attractive Typical pressure drop per tray is of the order of 3 in. of water or 0.1 psi For separation of light hydrocarbons and aqueous solutions, the tray ef- ficiencies are typically 60 to 90% for distillation, and 10 to 20% for gas absorption and stripping For a typical sieve tray, the holes are 0.25-0.50 in diameter, and the hole area is about one-tenth of the active cross-section area For a typical valve tray, the holes are about 1.5 in. diameter, each out- fitted with a liftable cap; there are typically 12 to 14 caps per square foot of active tray cross-section The typical height of a column weir is 2 in.; the weir length is usually about 75% of the tray diameter; maximum liquid rate is about 8 gal/ min. per inch of weir; for high liquid rates, multipass arrangement are often the choice For towers of less than 3 ft diam- eter and where low pressure drop through the tower is desirable, packings (random or structured) are commonly preferred over trays. If the packing is initially distributed with care and is periodically redis- tributed, the volumetric efficiency CHEMICAL ENGINEERING WWW.CHE.COM OCTOBER 2006 45 can be greater than that of a compa- rable tray tower Most reflux drums are horizontal, kept about half full, and have a liq- uid holdup of 5 min For 3-ft-diameter towers, about 4 ft of column height should be added at the top for vapor disengagement, and 6 ft at the bottom for liquid level and reboiler return Due to wind-loading and other struc- tural considerations, towers should be no higher than about 175 ft. Fur- thermore, the ratio of tower height to diameter should be less than 30 Liquid-liquid extraction Ordinarily, the phase with the greater volumetric flowrate should be the dispersed phase; however, in extractors subject to backmixing, the phase with the lower flowrate should instead be dispersed. It is also preferable that the dispersed phase be the one that wets the equip- ment less well. Finally, because the holdup of continuous phase is usu- ally the greater, it is desirable that that phase consist of the less expen- sive and/or less hazardous material For separations achievable in rela- tively few stages (5 to 10 for in- stance), packed extraction towers offer advantages, unless the surface tension exceeds 10 dynes/cm. It is possible to achieve attractive HETS values (5 to 10 ft, for example). Dis- persed-phase loadings should not exceed 25 gal/(ft 2 )(min), and the dispersed phase should be redistrib- uted every 5 to 7 ft Sieve tray on extraction columns typically have holes of only 3- to 8- mm diameter. Velocities through the holes should kept below about 0.8 ft/s to minimize formation of excessively small drops. Typical tray spacings are 6 to 24 in.; typical tray efficien- cies are in the range of 20 to 30% Crystallization from solution Whether melt crystallization or crys- tallization from solution is employed, the maximum recovery of solids is limited by the eutectic composition Crystal growth rates and the final crystal size are both controlled by limiting the extent of supersatura- tion in the liquid It is good operating practice to hold the liquid temperature at a few Fahrenheit degrees below the satu- ration temperature for the prevail- ing concentration
Filtration A convenient way to classify the ease of a given filtration task is to measure the rate of cake buildup on a labora- tory vacuum leaf filter: 0.1 to 10 cm/s indicates rapid filtration; 0.1 to 10 cm/ min, medium-speed filtration; and 0.1 to 10 cm/h, slow filtration Selection of the filtration method for a given task depends partly on whether the liquid phase or the solid phase is the one of value. Among the suitable methods if the liquid phase is desired are filter presses, sand filters and pres- sure filters. If the solid phase is desired, consider rotary vacuum filters Drying of solids Continuous tray and belt dryers for natural or pelletized 315-mm gran- ular material commonly have drying times in the range of 10-200 min Drum dryers that handle pastes and slurries operate with contact times of 3-12 seconds, generating flakes that are 1-3 mm thick; common evapora- tion rates are 15 to 30 kh/(m 2 )(h). Commonly found diameters are 1.5 to 5.0 ft; common rotation rates are 2-10 rev/min; evaporative capacities as high as about 3,000 lb/h are fea- sible in full-sale installations Fluidized-bed dryers work best on very small particles, with diameters of a few tenths of a millimeter; but this technique has also been used successfully with particles of up to 4 mm diameter. A suitable velocity for the fluidization gas is twice the mini- mum required for fluidization. In many continuous operations, drying times of 1-2 min are sufficient, but some products (including some phar- maceuticals) require much longer Most spray dryers complete their task in less than one minute; in fact, the surface moisture is usually re- moved within the first 5 s. The wet feed and the drying air are most com- monly fed in parallel. The atomizing nozzles typically operate at pressures of 300 to 400 psi, and have openings that measure 0.012 to 0.15 in. Size reduction Ball or roller mills are commonly set up to operate in a closed circuit which includes size classification and the return of the oversize to the mill Roll crushers come in two versions: either smooth or with teeth. A 24- in., toothed crusher can accommo- date pieces of feed as large as 7 in. in radius. Smooth rolls achieve reduction ratios of about fourfold. Rotation speeds are typically 50 to 900 rev/min To produce particularly small par- ticles, consider hammer mills. Large units operate at 900 rev/min; small ones can reach 16,000 rev/min Rod mills usually feed on particles of about 50-mm size. The material is usu- ally reduced to about 865 mesh, but reduction to 300 mesh is achievable For fine grinding, consider ball mills, tube mills or pebble mills. The last- named are the choice when metal contaminations must be avoided For jaw crushers, the feed is usually under 4 in. diameter; typically, about eight to ten strokes are needed to achieve the required size reduction. Gyratory crushers can produce par- ticles that are more rounded Mixing and agitation Solids with a low settling velocity (such as 0.03 ft/s) can be success- fully suspended with either turbine or propeller agitators; suspension of solids with settling velocities greater than 0.15 ft/s requires vigorous agi- tation with a propeller When only brief contact time (such as 1 or 2 s) is required between two components, inline blending should prove adequate. Typical power in- puts are 0.1 to 0.2 hp/gal Small propellers are usually run at about 1,500 to 1,750 rev/min, large ones at about 400 to 800 rev/min Paddle agitators typically employ paddles that extend to about 50 to 80% of the inside diameter of the vessel. Typically, the rate of rotation lies between 20 and 150 rev/min
Agglomeration Some major methods of particle size enlargement are: compression into a mold; extrusion through a die fol- lowed by cutting or breaking to size; Engineering Practice 46 CHEMICAL ENGINEERING WWW.CHE.COM OCTOBER 2006 globule formation from molten ma- terial followed by solidification; and agglomeration under tumbling or other conditions of agitation without a binding agent For rotating-drum granulators typi- cal length-to-diameter ratios are 2 to 3, rotational speeds are 10 to 20 rev/ min, and the pitch as great as 10 deg. The size of the produced granules de- pends in part on the rotational speed, the residence time and the amount of binder. Commonly, the produced granules are 2 to 5 mm in diameter If uniformity of product size is im- portant, rotary disk granulators are preferable to drum granulators, other things being equal For roll compacting and briquetting, typical rolls measure from 130-mm diameter by 30 mm wide to about 900-mm diameter by 550 mm wide. The material extruded by the rolls, typically about 1 mm thick, can be broken into any size desired Rotary compression equipment, feeding upon powders or granules and typically operating at around 100 rev/min, is suitable for produc- ing tablets of uniform size, at rates as high as 10,000 tablets/min Fluidized-bed granulation is typi- cally carried out in beds having a depth of 12 to 24 in. Typical air ve- locities are 0.1 to 2.5 m/s, which is three to ten times the minimum ve- locity needed for fluidization Edited by Nicholas P. Chopey CHEMICAL ENGINEERING WWW.CHE.COM OCTOBER 2006 47 Principal author Alejandro Anaya Durand (Parque Espaa 15B, Colonia Condesa 06140, Mexico D.F. Mexico; aanayadurand@hot mail.com), is a member of the Faculty of Chemistry at the National Autonomous Uni- versity of Mexico (UNAM). He has more than 45 years of experience in process and project engineering, during almost all of which time he has also served as a professor at UNAM and other Mexican universities. Also included in that career are 30 years with the Mexican Institute of Petroleum (IMP), from which he retired in 1998. He is a member of the Mexicos National Institute of Researchers (SNI), and is a Fellow of AIChE. The Mexican Institute of Chemical Engineers, the National Soc. of Chemistry and the National College of Chemical Engineers have each hon- ored him with excellence awards. The author of more than 220 articles in local and international technical magazines, he holds a masters degree in chemical engineering from UNAM. Call for Papers 2007 Chem Show Conference October 30 November 1, 2007 Javits Convention Center New York, NY Typical topics to be covered: Energy effciency Process control and instrumentation Process-plant safety Green engineering Pumps, valves, other fuid-fow equipment Distillation Solid-liquid separations Water pollution control Air pollution control Process integration Process-plant water supply How to submit a paper: We invite abstracts (less that 200 words) for proposed, non-promotional, technical presentations on the above conference topics or related felds. Emphasis should be on modern proven technologies, application of best practices, improvement of return on investment. Send by February 1, 2007 to: Nicholas P. Chopey at nchopey@che.com, or fax to (212) 621-4694. Presentations to run for about 25 minutes, followed by 5 minutes for questions and discussion. Presented by In conjunction with 10392 10392 CHE 2007 Papers ad.indd 1 9/20/06 11:49:18 AM Circle XXX or go to www.info.ims.ca/34xx-xx References 1. Anaya Durand, Alejandro, Heuristics Rules and Criteria for Equipment Process Design, Revista Instituto Mexicano de ingenieros Qumicos, November December 1993. 2. Anaya Durand, Alejandro, and oth- ers, Updated Rules for Pipe Sizing, Chem. Eng, pp. 153156, May 1999. Also recommended 3. Peters, Max S., Plant Design and Economics for Chemical Engineers, 5th Ed., McGraw- Hill, New York, 2003. 4. Cheremisnoff, Nicholas, Handbook of Chem- ical Process Equipment, Butterwith-Heine- mann, 2000. 5. Walas, Stanley, Heuristics in Chemical En- gineering, Butterworh-Heinemann, 1990.