Petitioner and Dominic got married on her eighth month of pregnancy in civil rites solemnized in Pasay City on June 24,1991. Despite remaining dependent on their parents for support Dominic remained!o"less and dependent upon his father for support until he finished his college course in 199$. She discovered his illicit relationship with,aida, his co-employee at oyota as a salesman +n %eptem"er 1994
Petitioner and Dominic got married on her eighth month of pregnancy in civil rites solemnized in Pasay City on June 24,1991. Despite remaining dependent on their parents for support Dominic remained!o"less and dependent upon his father for support until he finished his college course in 199$. She discovered his illicit relationship with,aida, his co-employee at oyota as a salesman +n %eptem"er 1994
Petitioner and Dominic got married on her eighth month of pregnancy in civil rites solemnized in Pasay City on June 24,1991. Despite remaining dependent on their parents for support Dominic remained!o"less and dependent upon his father for support until he finished his college course in 199$. She discovered his illicit relationship with,aida, his co-employee at oyota as a salesman +n %eptem"er 1994
Immaturity not a ground for Psychological Incapacity
Mendoza v. Republic of the Philippines
G.R. No. 15!"#$ November 1%$ %&1% 'ersamin$ (.) *acts) Petitioner and Dominic got married on her eighth month of pregnancy in civil rites solemnized in Pasay City on June 24,1991, after which they moved to her place, although remaining dependent on their parents for support Dominic remained !o"less and dependent upon his father for support until he finished his college course in #cto"er 199$ %he too& on various !o"s to meet the family's needs (fter graduation of Dominic, he sold )cyclopedia's and eventually got a !o" in *oyota as a salesman +n %eptem"er 1994, she discovered his illicit relationship with ,aida, his co-employee at *oyota .otors )ventually, communication "etween them "ecame rare until they started to sleep in separate rooms Dominic fails to support his family despite his earning /orse, he was fired and was held criminally lia"le for violation of estafa and 0P 22 #n #cto"er 11, 1992, Dominic a"andoned the con!ugal a"ode "ecause petitioner as&ed him for 3time and space to thin& things over4 ( month later, she refused his attempt at reconciliation, causing him to threaten to commit suicide (t that, she and her family immediately left the house to live in another place concealed from him 5er petition for declaration of nullity of marriage "ased on psychological incapacity of her hus"and was approved "y the 6*C "ut was denied "y the Court of (ppeals due to lac& of evidence hence this petition to the %upreme Court Issue) /hether or not the petition should "e granted +eld) 7o *he C( correctly indicated that the ill-feelings that she har"ored towards Dominic, which she admitted during her consultation with Dr %amson, furnished the "asis to dou"t the findings of her e8pert witness9 that such findings were one-sided, "ecause Dominic was not himself su"!ected to an actual psychiatric evaluation "y petitioner's e8pert9 and that he also did not participate in the proceedings9 and that the findings and conclusions on his psychological profile "y her e8pert were solely "ased on the self- serving testimonial descriptions and characterizations of him rendered "y petitioner and her witnesses .oreover, the only people Dr %amson interviewed a"out Dominic were those whom petitioner herself referred +n Dagdag, the Court ruled that 3)rlinda failed to comply with guideline 7o 2 which re:uires that the root cause of psychological incapacity must "e medically or clinically identified and sufficiently proven "y e8perts, since no psychiatrist or medical doctor testified as to the alleged psychological incapacity of her hus"and4 0ut here, the e8pert's testimony on Dominic's psychological profile did not identify, much less prove, the root cause of his psychological incapacity "ecause said e8pert did not e8amine Dominic in person "efore completing her report "ut simply relied on other people's recollection and opinion for that purpose Dominic's alleged immaturity, deceitfulness and lac& of remorse for his dishonesty and lac& of affection did not necessarily constitute psychological incapacity )motional immaturity and irresponsi"ility did not e:uate with psychological incapacity 7or were his supposed se8ual infidelity and criminal offenses manifestations of psychological incapacity *he acts of dominic would only constitute legal separation under (rticle 11 of the ;amily Code 5ence the petition of (ra"elle .endoza is denied