Farm Mechanization in India: Unfolding Future of Mechanized Farms Tillage & seedbed Preparation Sowing/ Planting Fertiliser Application Irrigation Harvesting Post Harvesting Inter Cultivation Plant Protection Mechanized Solutions for whole chain Mechanisation is clearly the answer to key performance parameter at every stage of cropping cycle Scope of Farm Mechanization Sales of Tractors and Power Tillers in India 0 1,00,000 2,00,000 3,00,000 4,00,000 5,00,000 6,00,000 7,00,000 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2,47,531 2,96,080 3,52,835 3,46,501 3,42,836 3,93,836 5,45,109 6,07,000 TRACTORS 0 10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 60,000 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 17,481 22,303 24,791 26,135 35,294 38,794 55,000 60,000 POWER TILLERS Trend of power availability from different sources 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 1971-72 1981-82 1991-92 2001-02 2005-06 2009-10 8.45 18.46 26.14 36.77 38.45 41.67 10.79 15.82 24.84 26.31 25.66 25.13 Electric motors Diesel engines Power Tillers Tractors Draught Animals Agriculture Workers Share of agricultural worker & draught animals came down from 63.5% in 1971- 72 to 13.67% in 2009-10 Comparison of Mechanization with Other Countries Source: FAO Yearbook 2003 Sl. No. Country Farm Power No. of Tractors per 1000 Ha. No. of Combine Harvesters per 1000 Ha. (kW/Ha) 1 India 1.36 15.75 0.026 2 Japan 8.75 461.22 236.98 3 U.K. 2.5 88.34 8.3 4 France 2.65 68.5 4.93 5 Italy 3.01 211.08 4.71 6 Germany 2.35 79.817 11.41 7 Argentina -- 10.74 1.79 8 Brazil -- 13.66 0.915 9 China -- 6.98 2.53 10 Pakistan -- 16.47 0.08 11 Egypt -- 30.7 0.79 United States [2.4%, 95%] Western Europe [3.9%, 95%] Former Soviet Union [14.4%, 80%] Brazil [14.8%, 75%] Argentina [9.4%, 75%] India [55%,40%] China [64.9%, 38%] Africa [60%, 20%] Population engaged in Agriculture vis-a-vis level of farm mechanization Higher share of labour (55%) with lesser contribution to GDP (14%) makes farming in India less remunerative and incidence of farmers poverty Advantages of Farm Mechanisation Improves utilization efficiency of inputs such as seeds, chemicals, fertilizers and energy Ensures timeliness of farm operations leading to higher productivity and cropping intensity Reduces cost of production and increases agricultural income Reduces drudgery and improves safety in operation of farm machinery Helps in conserving natural resources e.g, water Estimated contributions from farm mechanization Savings in seeds: 15-20%; Savings in fertilizers: 15-20%; Increase in cropping intensity: 5-20%; Savings in time: 20-30%; and Reduction in manual labour: 20-30%; Overall increase in farm productivity 10-15 %;
Farm Mechanization: Key driver of productivity Agricultural productivity has positive correlation with level of farm mechanization 0.25 0.31 0.35 0.63 0.92 1.35 1.66 0.522 0.71 0.872 1.023 1.38 1.723 1.92 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 1951 1961 1971 1981 1991 2001 2010 Foodgrain Yield (T/ha) Farm Power (Kw/Ha) Need For Accelerated Farm Mechanization Positive correlation between farm power availability and agricultural productivity Addressing scarcity of agricultural labour (MNREGA) Climate Change Mitigation (less sowing window, quick harvesting, delay in planting) However, notwithstanding advantages: Growth of farm mechanization (farm power/ha) is poor in last decade (CAGR: about 2% between 2001-2010) ; and Level of mechanization is significantly low in many potential regions (Eastern, North Eastern, Central)
2294 1555 1662 1530 1008 1987 1560 3383 1297 1405 1330 1377 2470 1285 1039 1796 1809 1047 1256 1397 4144 931 1496 2477 2544 2236 1780 2522 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 Punjab Haryana TN WB Kerala Tripura AP UP National Average: 1790 Kg/ha Farm Power Availability and Foodgrain Yield ( 2010-2011) National Average: 1.66 KW/ha Goa High Mechanisation & High Yield: 5 States Low/Moderate Mechanisation & High /Average Yield: 7 States (Rice Based) Uttarakhand Manipur Meghalaya Low Mechanisation & Low Yield: 17 States Farm Power ( Kw/ha) F o o d g r a i n
Y i e l d
( K g / h a )
Tillage & seedbed Preparation Sowing/ Planting Fertiliser Application Irrigation Harvesting Post Harvesting Inter Cultivation Plant Protection Level of Farm Mechanization in India Overall about 40-45% What Retards Farm Mechanization Growth Farm Mechanization requires minimum scale of operation; Small and Marginal Farmers comprising about 84% of cultivators - but adverse economy of scale and their poor financial strength excludes them from fold of farm mechanization
2.2% CAGR between 2001- 2010 0.42 0.59 0.91 1.35 1.5 1.66 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 1971-72 1981-82 1991-92 2001-02 2005-06 2009-10 Farm Power (kW/ha) Farm Mechanization has so far eluded Small and Marginal Farmers (SMF) Farm Equipment especially tractors, power tillers possessed by Small and Marginal Farmers are substantially less than medium and large farmers Small and Marginal Farmers Ongoing Programmatic Interventions Orientation towards Individual Ownership : Macro Management of Agriculture (MMA), National Food Security Mission (NFSM), Rashtriya Krishi Vikas Yojna (RKVY): Small and Marginal Land Holdings (<2 ha): Adverse Economies of Scale- Individual ownership is not viable High cost of ownerships: Many especially small/medium farmers can not afford even with 50% subsidy; Subsidy and Bank Linkages : Financial exclusion of due to small/marginal farmers poor credit worthiness
Present Policy Environment: Institutional Credit Small/Medium Farmers : Low credit worthiness Farm Equipment Loan linked with land holdings: High Entry Barrier for small/medium Entrepreneurs' to set up mechanization services (Custom Hiring Centre); Result: Stagnating Credit Growth in Farm Mechanization
Stagnating Credit growth in Farm Mechanization Source: NABARD, Annual Report 2009-10 Credit flows more freely to Crop or Working Capital Loan / ST Loan Balancing Adverse Economies of Scale : Custom Hiring or Taxi Model FICCI-YES Bank Report, 2009 The Core Issues Adverse Economies of Scale; Weak financial strength of majority of farmers (SMF); Lack of access to credit to Rural Entrepreneurs for setting Custom Hiring Centre; Need for promoting appropriate Farm Equipment: Low cost, region and crop specific, indigenous technology
Policy Framework : Addressing Issues Unbundling Agriculture Services from Farmers; Facilitate Entrepreneurs to establish Custom Hiring Centre;
Facilitating rural entrepreneurs
Special incentives to Small and Marginal farmers Focusing on village level mechanization : low cost, region crop specific, indigenous technology
Addressing adverse Economies of Scale
Access to Credit
Promotion of appropriate Farm Equipment: Low cost, region and crop specific, indigenous
Individual Ownership Vs Custom Hiring Key Question is How to cater marginal and small farmers who aggregate to > 80% of cultivators Sub Mission on Agricultural Mechanization (SMAM)* : Key Interventions 1. Promotion and Strengthening of Agricultural Mechanisation through Training, Testing and Demonstration; 2. Appropriate Post Harvest Technology and Management (PHTM); 3. Financial Assistance or Procurement Subsidy for creating ownerships of Agriculture Machinery and Equipments; 4. Establishment of Farm Machinery Banks for Custom Hiring
* Under the aegis of National Mission on Agricultural Extension & Technology (NMAE&T)
Sub Mission on Agricultural Mechanization (SMAM)* : Key Interventions 5. Creation of Hi-Tech, High Productive Equipment Hub for Specific crops (Sugarcane, Cotton etc.); 6. Enhancing Farm Productivity at village level by introducing appropriate farm mechanisation in selected villages; 7. Creating ownership of appropriate farm equipment among Small/Marginal farmers; 8. Assistance to farmers for promoting mechanized farming
* Under the aegis of National Mission on Agricultural Extension & Technology (NMAE&T)
Other Key Focus Areas (Quality Assurance) Strengthening core Competency of Farm Machinery Training and Testing Institutes (FMTTI): Quality Assurance, Performance Testing of newly developed equipment Introduction of self certification for reputed manufacturer; Expanding network of Farm Equipment Testing Centers: Currently 28 SAU/ICAR Institutes/State Agencies are nominated to test/certify non-self propelled/non motorized equipment
Collaboration with ICAR and Manufacturers for product development and customization Need for more products and commercialization of developed products/technologies
Other Key Focus Area: Research & Development High women workforce in agriculture both in production and processing Ergonomically designed tools and equipment for Reduced drudgery Enhanced safety & comfort Other Key Focus Area : Gender-friendly tools and equipment Providing choice to farmers to select brand/equipment Promoting Custom Hiring Centres rather than distributing Tractors at high top up subsidy To develop Village and SMF orientation State Related Issues Unfolding Future Tilling, Sowing, Rice Transplanting, harvesting, Transportation ?
We provide one stop solution- Attractive package
ABC Farm Services (99999 88888 / 1800 800 1234) India, 2020 Thank you