vs. eirs o! Fran"is"o Pas#or Expropriation suit is incapable of pecuniary estimation; thus, it falls within the jurisdiction of the RTC, regardless of the value of the subject property. Fa"#s$ Petitioner fled before the MTC a complaint to expropriate a property of the respondents MTC dismissed the complaint on the ground of lack of jurisdiction, stating that in an action for eminent domain, the %rin"i%al "ause is the e&er"ise o! su"' %o(er or rig'#; thus, it is (i#'in #'e e&"lusive original )uris*i"#ion o! #'e RT+ TC also dismissed the complaint holding that an action for eminent domain a!ected title to real property; hence, the value o! #'e %ro%er#y to be expropriated "ould *e#er,ine ('e#'er #'e "ase s'oul* -e .le* -e!ore #'e MT+ or RT+ and since the #alue of the property "as less than P$%, %%%&%% or P', ()%&%% to be exact, it should be fled before the MTC Petitioner appealed directly to this Court raising a pure *uestion of la", in "hich the court denied the Petition for e#ie" for being posted out of time Issue$ /'e#'er #'e MT+ 'as )uris*i"#ion over "ases !or e,inen# *o,ain ('ere #'e assesse* value is -elo( P012 111 or #'e RT+ el*$ RT+ +e agree "ith the petitioner that an e&%ro%ria#ion sui# is in"a%a-le o! %e"uniary es#i,a#ion The court adopted the criterion of frst ascertaining the nature of the principal action or remedy sought, '- .f it is primarily for the re"overy o! su, o! ,oney, the claim is considered "a%a-le o! %e"uniary es#i,a#ion3 the jurisdiction "ould depend on the amount of the claim $- .f the basic issue is o#'er #'an #'e rig'# #o re"over ,oney or #'e ,oney "lai, is %urely in"i*en#al #o or a "onsequen"e o! #'e %rin"i%al relie! soug'# --- subject of litigation may not be estimated in terms of money and are cogni/able exclusi#ely by the courts of frst instance In #'e %resen# "ase, an e&%ro%ria#ion sui# does no# involve #'e re"overy o! a su, o! ,oney .t deals "ith the exercise by the go#ernment of its authority and right to take pri#ate property for public use The value o! #'e %ro%er#y to be expropriated is estimated in monetary terms, ho"e#er, it is merely incidental to the expropriation suit because the amount of compensation is determined only after the court is satisfed "ith the propriety of the expropriation
The 5 Elements of the Highly Effective Debt Collector: How to Become a Top Performing Debt Collector in Less Than 30 Days!!! the Powerful Training System for Developing Efficient, Effective & Top Performing Debt Collectors
ARNOLD ALVA - Petitioners HON. COURT OF APPEALS - Respondents Nature of The Case: Before Us Is A Petition For Review On Certiorari Under Rule 45 of The Rules of Court, As Amended, Assailing The Twin