80% of the rainfall takes place in two months of the monsoon season. Furthermore, we are having very long coastal area. Coastal area is comparatively more corrosive than the other area. Cracked concrete provides easy access to corroding agents, which further corrodes the reinforcement at accelerated rate resulting further deterioration of structure.
80% of the rainfall takes place in two months of the monsoon season. Furthermore, we are having very long coastal area. Coastal area is comparatively more corrosive than the other area. Cracked concrete provides easy access to corroding agents, which further corrodes the reinforcement at accelerated rate resulting further deterioration of structure.
80% of the rainfall takes place in two months of the monsoon season. Furthermore, we are having very long coastal area. Coastal area is comparatively more corrosive than the other area. Cracked concrete provides easy access to corroding agents, which further corrodes the reinforcement at accelerated rate resulting further deterioration of structure.
Strengthening/Rehabilitation of a structure may be required on account of one or
combination of the following: Deterioration of structure due to environmental effect. Revision in loading standard. Seismic retrofitting. Brief about such factors are given as below: Deterioration of structure due to environmental effect Concrete is heterogeneous as well as porous material. It allows ingress of air and moisture in it.In our country, 80% of the rainfall takes place in two months of the monsoon season. Furthermore, we are having very long coastal area. Coastal area is comparatively more corrosive than the other area. Ingress of moisture, air or chloride (which is available in air from the sea water in the coastal area) reaches reinforcement of RCC structures. It corrodes the reinforcement. Corroded product is having much more volume than its original volume. To make space for its increased volume, it causes crack in the concrete. Cracked concrete provides easy access to corroding agents, which further corrodes the reinforcement at accelerated rate resulting further deterioration of structure.
2.2 Revision in loading standard From time to time, loading standard is being revised. If we introspect the loading standard of the Indian Railways, which the railway companies followed initially when the railway line was started in this country, we find that axle load was 7.5t. Now-a-days, axle load has been increased to 25t in respect of MBG loading standard and 30t in case of HM loading standard. Similarly, longitudinal force was not considered initially while designing the bridge. First time, It was introduced in the BRIDGE RULE in 1923. It doesnt mean that initially, the engineers were not aware of the longitudinal forces. Actually, longitudinal forces at that time were of smaller magnitude, which was not having any problem in affecting the section of the substructure since vertical load was predominant and the section adopted for vertical load alongwith practical consideration (i.e. required top width to place the girder with some space to do inspection and repair work), at that time, was sufficient to cater for the longitudinal forces easily. Now-a-days, tractive effort of the MBG loading is 100t and that for HM loading is 135t. Braking force depends upon the span length and it may be even more than that of tractive effort in case the span of bridge is more. Due to revised loading standard, the old bridge, which is still in sound condition, needs strengthening on account of its capacity enhancement to meet with the increased loading standard.
2.3 Seismic retrofitting After getting past experience, world over, seismic forces are being revised to ensure safety. Everywhere, this revision is on the upward side. As such, as per the revised codal provisions, existing bridges need to be strengthened as far as seismic provisions are concerned. This can be achieved by seismic retrofitting of the structures.
Review of the conventional strengthening/rehabilitation procedures Before coming to the actual discussions about strengthening/ rehabilitation of the structures with the help of FRP, it is better to review the existing strengthening/ rehabilitation procedures alongwith its merits and demerits. The prevalent conventional strengthening/rehabilitation methods are given as below: Removal of the deteriorated material and repairing of the structure with fresh concrete. Section addition. Providing external reinforcement with the help of steel plates. External pre-stressing.
3.1 Removal of the deteriorated material and repairing of the structures with fresh concrete - In this process, deteriorated and loose materials are being removed. Surface is properly cleaned. Treatment to the reinforcement is provided to check further corrosion. Then after, wiremesh is laid followed by proper guniting of the surface. Merits and demerits of this system of strengthening/rehabilitation work are given as below: Merits Procedure is simple. Expertise is locally available which has to be followed properly. Process is comparatively economical. Demerits It delays the corrosion activities but does not stop. It does not enhance the capacity of the structure. It requires closure of the bridge while doing the repair work.
3.2 Section addition/Enlargement Here, strengthening/rehabilitation is done by addition/ enlargement of the section. It is possible with piers, abutment (on span side), columns etc but not possible in beams and slabs. Jacketing and providing buttress to the abutment also falls in this category. Merits and demerits of this system of strengthening/rehabilitation work are given as below: Merits Design principle is simple and well understood. Procedure is simple to adopt Demerits During the strengthening/rehabilitation period, bridges may need its closure. Strengthening/rehabilitation for vertical portion of structure is possible like columns, piers etc. But, horizontal portion of the structure like beam and slab, the same is either not possible or very difficult. Weight of the structure is increased.
3.3 Providing external reinforcement with the help of steel plates In this process, steel plate is added on the tension side of the beam and the same is properly fixed with the help of epoxy. The added steel plate act as external reinforcement and hence, enhance the flexural capacity of the structure. Before providing the external reinforcement, all the loose materials are removed, surface is roperly evened and cleaned. A layer of good quality of epoxy is applied and then after, steel plate is fixed. Schematic arrangement of the method is shown as below. External reinforced of RCC beam with steel plate RCC Beam Steel plate Epoxy layer 1 3 .65 56 Side Elevation Section
Merits and demerits of this system of strengthening/rehabilitation work are given as below: Merits Work is fast. As such, closer time of the bridge while strengthening/ rehabilitating the bridge is less. Material added for strengthening i.e. steel is of assured quality (not like concrete where chances of voids while field application may be there). Hence, quality of work is better. Demerits In case of large span beam, it becomes difficult to handle the steel plate due to its heavy weight. In case of joining of plate is required due to longer span, difficulty is being faced in providing butt-welded joint. Corrosion is being experienced to the external provided steel plate. Steel being denser material, it adds up appreciable weight to the structure.
3.4 External pre-stressing - Strengthening/rehabilitation work, particularly, in case of girder bridges can be done with the help of external prestressing. External prestressing force is provided with the help of external pre-stressing cables, which remains outside the main girder. By this way, structure is strengthened/ rehabilitated. Merits and demerits of this system of strengthening/rehabilitation work are given below: Merits Adding up of the weight is the least. Performance of the structure is well ascertained till the cables are performing well. Demerits Due to cables being external, chances of corrosion is there. Chances of sabotage by cutting of the cable by the saboteurs.are there Problem in providing anchorage to the external cables may be there. Strengthening/Rehabilitation of the structures with the help of FRP - FRP stands for Fibre Reinforced Plastic. It is a wonderful material, which came into existence around 1950 and then after, now-a-days, having wide application. Very good potential is there regarding use of this product as strengthening of the civil engineering structures. Fibres are embedded in resin matrix, which binds the fibres and produce excellent material after curing, known as FRP. Fibre may be either glass fibre or carbon fibre or aramid fibre. Similarly, resin may be either epoxy resin, polyester resin or vinylester resin. Depending upon the type of fiber used, product is known as Glass Fibre Reinforced Plastic (GFRP), in case glass fibre is used, Carbon Fibre Reinforced Plastic (CFRP), in case Carbon fibre is used and Aramid Fibre Reinforced Plastic (AFRP), in case aramid fibre is used. Before further discussions, it is necessary to have certain idea about the strength parameters of various types of FRP products. The same is given as below: S.No. Type of FRP % age of fibre Density in Kg/M3 Tensile strength in kg/cm2 1. GFRP 50 to 80 1600 2000 4000 18000 2. CFRP 65 to 75 1600 1900 12000 22500 3. AFRP 60 to 70 1050 1250 10000 18000
Merits of FRP Products: FRP products are corrosion free. As such, even with its exposure to extreme climate, the same is not corroded. It strength is higher, even than that of steel. Weight-wise, it is lighter than the steel. Strength to weight ratio is very much favourable in case of FRP. Due to lighter material, transportation problem is not there. Due to lighter in weight, its application is easy. Lighter weight allows FRP product even in the form of roll. Hence, adequate length of FRP roll can be had and there is no requirement of any field joint. FRP products are having very good fatigue property. 4.3 Demerits of FRP products: FRP product is less ductile. As such, strengthened structure losses its ductility to certain extent. Plastic behaviour of the FRP products is not constant/regular. As such, due to erratic plastic stage performance, its ultimate behaviour is not very certain. In case of uneven surface, problem in its application will be there. FRP products are costlier. In small quantity, its application may not be favourable from cost and quantity consideration. FRP product is prone to the ultra violet rays attack. As such, UV stabilizer needs to be added while manufacturing FRP product, so as to enhance its life.
5.0 Strengthening/Rehabilitation procedure with the help of FRP: Mainly there are two methods, which are predominantly being used in strengthening/rehabilitation of structures with the help of FRP. The same are given below: 1. Wet lay- up method. 2. Pre-fabrication of FRP followed by its application.
5.1 Surface preparation - Before start of the work, it is very much essential to ensure that surface should be dry, clean, free from oil and grease and any type of loose materials. To ensure little roughness, light sand blasting or grinding can be done followed by proper cleaning of the surface to remove dust particles. Any protrusion should be made good otherwise, it may create void in the nearby area. Crack more than 0.3mm width, if any, needs to be properly epoxy grouted to ensure good quality.
5.2 Wet lay-up method - This method is nothing but in-situ preparation of FRP product and its application required in connection with strengthening/rehabilitation work of structures. Firstly, one coat application of good quality epoxy is required. Then after, saturated fibre in the appropriate resin should be applied on the surfa Strengthening/Rehabilitation of various types of structures - Depending upon case-to-case and member-to-member, strengthening/rehabilitation may be of different types. Most common among them may be either one or combination of the following as given below: Strengthening/Rehabilitation work to enhance the flexural capacity. Strengthening/Rehabilitation work to enhance the Shear capacity Strengthening/Rehabilitation work to enhance the axial force carrying capacity (either alone or in combination with bending). Strengthening/Rehabilitation work to enhance the flexural capacity - In this case, on the tension side, FRP sheet of designed thickness is applied. It acts as an external reinforcement. Added external FRP reinforcement alongwith internal steel reinforcement, both on the tension side provide the desired quantity of reinforcement. This addition shifts the neutral axis on the tension side and that enhances the total compressive force on the compression side. As such, structure is strengthened to the desired extent. Schematic diagram of the flexural strengthening of a beam is given as below: R e q u ire d z o n e o f s t re n g th e n in g Z o n e o f a n ch o ra g e 2 0 .3 2 45 Z o n e o f a n ch o ra g e A A S e c t io n A - A T y p ic a l D ia g ram sh ow in g s t re n g th e n in g o f b e am w ith F R P As necessary calculation is being done in deciding the length of the reinforcement even away from the zone of requirement to ensure transfer of force through bond length, similar is the situation in strengthening with FRP also. In addition to the zone of requirement, FRP sheet is extended beyond that in such a manner that adequate anchorage should be available to transfer the force safely.
6.1.1 Orientation of the fibres - While strengthening the member, orientation of the fibre is of utmost importance. This is so, because strength of FRP product is not equal in all directions. In the axial direction of fibre, its strength is the maximum. In flexural members, tension is along the span direction and mainly for that, steel reinforcement is provided. In similar way, while providing the FRP sheet, the same should be in such a manner that direction of the fibre should be mainly along the span. 6.1.2 De-bonding of the FRP Sheet - Main problem with the FRP strengthening of RCC structure is that there is a chance of de-bonding of the FRP sheet with RCC. Debonding is not the desired phenomena. Wherever chances of de-bonding are there, FRP in the form of U strip is provided at the end to ensure proper end anchorage to the FRP sheet at the end. Anchorage should pass through the bottom of FRP sheet provided for flexural strengthening. If the structure is required for strengthening in shear also, then contribution of U strip will be there in transferring the shear force as well. Schematic diagram showing FRP strip in the form of U to avoid debonding is shown as below. Meanwhile, some mechanical anchorages have also been developed. These anchorages can be provided either independently or in combination with FRP U strip. 6.1.3 Flexural strengthening of the slabs - Slabs are also flexural members. In case, strengthening of slab is required, the same can also be done with the help of FRP strips. Schematic diagram of strengthening of RCC slabs of one way as well as two way type are given below: