raheleh.rostami@yahoo.com. 2012. American Transactions on Engineering & Applied Sciences. Volume 1 No.3. ISSN 2229-1652 eISSN 2229-1660 Online Available at http://TuEngr.com/ATEAS/V01/281-294.pdf 281
American Transactions on Engineering & Applied Sciences
http://TuEngr.com/ATEAS, http://Get.to/Research
Contribution of Historical Persian Gardens for Sustainable Urban and Environment Lessons from Hot Arid Region of Iran
Raheleh ROSTAMI a* , Hasanuddin LAMIT a , and Seyed Mysam Khoshnava b
a Department of Landscape Architecture, Faculty of Built Environment, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, MALAYSIA b Department of Construction Management, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, MALAYSIA
A R T I C L E I N F O
A B S T R A C T Article history: Received April 20, 2012 Received in revised form J uly 03, 2012 Accepted J uly 24, 2012 Available online J uly 25, 2012
Keywords: Sustainable Architect; Hot arid regions; Historical Persian gardens; Sustainable environment. Sustainable development is a widely accepted strategic framework in city planning and urban green spaces have an important role in it. Beside, increasing empirical evidence indicates that the presence of natural areas contributes to the quality of life in many ways. Also, urban nature provides important social and psychological benefits to human societies, which enrich human life with meanings and emotions. In order to exemplify the importance of urban green spaces for sustainability this paper analyses some historical Persian gardens for environmental sustainability and citizens well-being. In this study, historical Persian Gardens were chosen due to their historical background as first sample of Iranian urban green spaces which are still being used successfully. Some results of a survey conducted among visitors of historical gardens in Iran are presented and discussed. The issues investigated peoples motives for visiting gardens and the emotional dimension involved in the experience of nature and its importance for peoples general well-being. 2012 American Transactions on Engineering & Applied Sciences. 2012 American Transactions on Engineering & Applied Sciences 282 Raheleh, Rostami, Hasanuddin Lamit, and Seyed Meysam Khsohnava
1. Introduction Theory of sustainable architecture and urbanism is one of the contentious fields of architecture. The idea of sustainable architecture is offered to answer the questions about quality and types of relationship between design and environment. Sustainable architecture is a responsive and active design toward environment and place features and conditions. Sustainable architecture uses its ecological capabilities to create a suitable and desirable environmental condition. It includes a mixture of aesthetic, environmental, political, social and moral values. Some studies on the subject indicate that the concept of sustainability has a root in old customs and traditional cultures of mankind. Therefore, traditional architecture are recognized for considering cultural and social identities and help a great deal in creating social, environmental and economical sustainability. So, traditional aspects were considered in sustainable design philosophy.
Furthermore, sustainability is also a widely accepted strategic framework in city planning and urban green spaces have an important role in it and considered as one possible step towards creating sustainable urban environments (Costanza et al., 1997; J ongman et al., 2004; Opdam et al, 2006; J ongman, 1995; Zhang and Wang, 2006). Also, open green spaces are of a strategic importance for the quality of life of our increasingly urbanized society (Miller, 1988; Chiesura, 2004). In fact, increasing empirical evidence indicates that the presence of natural resources (i.e. urban parks, gardens and forests, green belts) and components (i.e. trees, water) in urban contexts contributes to the quality of life in many ways. Protective factors of nature for physical, psychological, and social health of people and community have been emphasized by various researches (Takano et al, 2002; St Leger, 2003; Maller et al, 2005). Physically and psychologically, view of natural scenes or elements foster stress recovery (Ulrich, 1981) by evoking positive feelings, reducing negative emotions, and blocking stressful thoughts and provide a sense of peacefulness and tranquility (Kaplan, 1983) and resulted in mental (Hartig et al., 1991; Conway, 2000) and physical health (Godbey et al., 1992). Therefore, local people consider urban nature and daily outdoor recreation opportunities to be the main factors that enhance their every day well-being (Eronene et al., 1997) even if used occasionally (Solecki &Welch,1995; Thompson 2002; Tinsley and Croskeys 2002; Chiesura 2004; Krenichyn 2004). Socially, nature can encourage the use of outdoor spaces, increase social integration and interaction among neighbors (Coley et al., 1997) which lead to trust, mutual understanding, shared values and supportive *Corresponding author (R. ROSTAMI). H/P: +06-177187197 E-mail address: raheleh.rostami@yahoo.com. 2012. American Transactions on Engineering & Applied Sciences. Volume 1 No.3. ISSN 2229-1652 eISSN 2229-1660 Online Available at http://TuEngr.com/ATEAS/V01/281-294.pdf 283
behavior (Loures et al., 2007). So, natural areas provide social, psychological and physical services, which enrich human life with meanings and emotions which are of crucial significance for the livability of modern cities and the well-being of urban dwellers which is a key component of sustainable city.
Besides the aforementioned, the functions of urban nature can provide economic benefits for both municipalities and citizens. Air purification by trees, for example, can lead to reduced costs of pollution reduction and water purification, wind and noise filtration can lead to microclimate stabilization. Furthermore, aesthetic, historical and recreational values of urban green spaces increase the attractiveness of the city and promote it as tourist destination, thus generating employment and revenues (Chiesura, 2004).
In order to exemplify the importance of urban green spaces for wellbeing of citizens and for the sustainability of the city where they live in, this paper analyses some historical Persian gardens. In this study, historical Persian Gardens were chosen due to their historical background as first sample of Iranian urban green spaces which are still being used successfully. Beside, historical Persian gardens are one of the well-known traditional methods in hot arid regions of Iran which play a role in works of beauty and aesthetic as well as compensating poor humidity to create a sustainable micro climate for human living. 2. MakingCitiesSustainable Nowadays, increasing in population, urbanization and the impact of urban areas on global environment mean that creating more sustainable urban areas is essential to sustainability (Ozdemir, 2007). Now, the question is: what is a sustainable city and how we can make a sustainable city?
Whereas, there is no acceptable definition for sustainable city; therefore, the concept of sustainable development which includes aspects of urban planning and community development is considered for cities sustainability. According to Bruntland commission (The World Commission 284 Raheleh, Rostami, Hasanuddin Lamit, and Seyed Meysam Khsohnava
on Environment and Development, 1987) sustainable development meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs. Also, Sibley (1998) stated that sustainability refers to the continuing ability of the planet to meet the needs of its living inhabitants. So, some cities have been developing their own sustainability indicators and aspects such as amount of public green spaces per inhabitant, public parks and recreation areas which are often mentioned as important factors to make the city livable, pleasant and attractive for its citizens (Chiesura, 2004). But, from another point of view, developing more sustainable cities is not just about improving the abiotic and biotic aspects of urban life, it is also about the social aspects of city life, that is about peoples satisfaction, experiences and perceptions of the quality of their everyday environments and quality of life issues are central to all.
To reach these goals, it is essential to follow all dimensions of sustainable development (environmental, social and economic). According to principles which were presented in The European Landscape Convention in Florence, 2000; to achieve sustainability, development should be based on a balanced and harmonious relationship between social needs, economic activities and the environment. Researchers (Beck, 1992; Sachs, 1995, Ferris et al, 2001; Loureset et al, 2007) claimed that urban landscape can be very positively linked to sustainability policies. Thompson (2000) indicates that sustainable development seems to offer landscape architects a tangible way of relating their aesthetic, social and ecological values. Urban green spaces benefits urban communities environmentally, aesthetically, recreationally, psychologically, socially and economically (Grahn, P., 1985; Burgess, J ., Harrison, C., Limb, M.,1988; Conway, H., 2000; Gehl, J ., Gemzoe, L, 2001). Once more, urban green spaces are considered as key components in urban sustainability. 3. MaterialandMethod Both, secondary (literature review) and primary data collection have been gathered. Primary data have been collected through a survey conducted among residents of two historical cities of Iran where, a lot of historical Persian gardens still exist and being used actively by urban residents. To find the most popular and memorable garden among the existing samples, a pilot test was undertaken based on residents preferences. The pilot test concluded Hasht Behesht Garden or/ Bagh-e- Bolbol (literally: Eight Paradise Garden or/ Nightingle Garden) which dating back to *Corresponding author (R. ROSTAMI). H/P: +06-177187197 E-mail address: raheleh.rostami@yahoo.com. 2012. American Transactions on Engineering & Applied Sciences. Volume 1 No.3. ISSN 2229-1652 eISSN 2229-1660 Online Available at http://TuEngr.com/ATEAS/V01/281-294.pdf 285
1660, in Isfahan city and Shahzdeh Garden (literally: Prince garden), which is created in 18 th
century, in Kerman as the most frequented.
Respondents were randomly selected among visitors of gardens from various age groups. Also, personal attributes like gender, occupation, and educational background were considered. Respondents were asked to fill the questionnaire during their stay in the gardens, so the answers would reflect their immediate experiences. Questionnaires were distributed on weekdays and weekends, in different hours of the day, and in different parts of the gardens. Responses formats were either closed (multiple choices) and open ended. The questionnaires addressed a broad range of issues, ranging from motives for respondents to visit gardens, their activities during visit periods and their feelings towards the gardens. Both descriptive and inferential techniques have been used to analyze and interpret the answers. 4. Results In total, 252 respondents took part in both cities. Sample includes 152 respondents (60.31%) in Esfahan and 100 respondents (39.68%) in Kerman. In total, male gender constitute prevalent respondents (57.5%). Age classes ranged from below 10 years old to over 60 and prevalent by 20-30 age groups (48.0%). Most of the respondents had university degree and categorized as student in occupation. The mean of living period in cities is about 23 years (S.D =16.16). 4.1 MotivesforVisitingGardens To calculate the data about peoples motives to visit the gardens, respondents were asked: Why do you visit this garden? The following alternative options were given: I visit this garden because of its nature and vegetation, its diversity, its beauty, its fascinating, its restorativeness effect, its accessibility, its silence, its familiarity, its representativeness and others. A frequency analysis of peoples motives to visit gardens showed that gardens nature and vegetation achieved highest percentage (54.4%) among other options (Fig. 1). This motive reflects the need of natural environment in urban context.
286 Raheleh, Rostami, Hasanuddin Lamit, and Seyed Meysam Khsohnava
Figure 1: Motivations of gardens for visitors: Frequency distribution.
Beauty of gardens stands out as second most effective factor for 42.9% of respondents. This motive revealed the relation of aesthetic attributes and peoples preferences and emphasized the effect of aesthetic on preferences like other researches (See: Nasar, 1983; Lothian, 1999; Kaltenborn & Bjerk, 2002; Parsons & Daniel, 2002; Hidalgo, Berto, Galindo, and Getren, 2006).
So, gardens became fascinating for 29% of the respondents. Also, aesthetic attributes can affect places restorativeness (Kaplan and Kaplan, 1989; Kaplan, 1995; Hernandez, Hidalgo, Berto, and Peron, 2001; Staats, Kieviet, and Hartig, 2003; Koole, Vnder, and Wulp, 2003; Galindo and Hidalgo, 2005) which was mentioned by almost 28% of respondents. Restorativeness effects of gardens can create a place for relaxation and step away from daily worries, breath fresh air and relax mentally and physically.
Gardens open view and easy accessibility were cited by almost 24% of respondents. Findings also, indicates that 18.3% of respondents visit garden because of its visual diversity and because it is a representative place of the city. 62.7% of respondents mentioned that these gardens are historic and represent a symbol for their cities. Hence, sense of attachment to these gardens was identified by 17.5% of respondents. Sense of attachment to a place result in a sense of belonging to towns and society and consequently enhance societys health status. Silence of gardens, meeting people and familiarity option follow in decreasing frequency. Motives like gardens silence and consideration of garden as meeting place reflect needs of experiencing solitude, as well as social relation and integration. 54.4% 42.9% 29% 27.4% 24.6% 24.2% 18.3% 18.3% 17.5% 17.5% 11.9% 8.3% Its Nature Its Beauty It's Fascinating Its restorativeness effect Its open view Its accessibility Its visual diversity It is a representative place of city Its silence A sense of attachment to place Its a meeting place I'm familiar with it *Corresponding author (R. ROSTAMI). H/P: +06-177187197 E-mail address: raheleh.rostami@yahoo.com. 2012. American Transactions on Engineering & Applied Sciences. Volume 1 No.3. ISSN 2229-1652 eISSN 2229-1660 Online Available at http://TuEngr.com/ATEAS/V01/281-294.pdf 287
4.2 FunctionalAspectsoftheGardens Another aspect of gardens is how gardens are to be used by residents. To understand the functions of gardens in urban area, respondents were asked: What is your experience and activity during visitation of garden? The following alternative options were given: I come to visit this garden for recreation, for sitting alone, for wandering and walking, for family picnic, to be with others, to do exercise, to observe nature and to be part of nature. A frequency analysis of peoples activity in gardens revealed that the most important experience which is considered by respondents is recreation. 49.6% of respondents visit gardens for recreation (Fig. 2). This result denotes the psychological effects of nature which evoke calm and relaxation as well as stress reduction. Subsequently, this confirms why 40% of respondents considered natural observation as second most important experience of garden. Also, 27.8% of respondents mentioned that visiting gardens is like being a part of nature. This result reflects again the importance of nature.
Figure 2: Experiences and activities in garden.
Family picnic (25.4%) and to be with others (22.2%) constitute another important aspects of gardens function. These functions reveal the social aspects of gardens which encourage people to use urban green spaces as part of their daily life style and to be with others. Subsequently, increase social interaction and integration invoke trust and supportive behaviors. Other activities like sitting, exercising and walking follow in decreasing frequency and less considered by respondents. 4.3 TheEmotionalDimensionofGardensExperience Another important research interest was to explore the emotional dimension of nature based 49.6% 27.8% 25.4% 22.2% 17% 7.5% 4% ForRecreation Toobservenature Forfamilypicnic Tobewithothers Forsitting Todoexercise Forwalking 288 Raheleh, Rostami, Hasanuddin Lamit, and Seyed Meysam Khsohnava
experiences, the benefits people perceive through natural contact and the relationship with their well-being. To explore emotional aspects of garden, respondents were asked to answer the following question: What feelings do gardens evoke you? and the following alternative options were given: safety, freedom, comfortable, happiness, calm and tranquility, memories remembrance, feeling healthier, feeling that you are closer to nature and feeling that you are different. Frequency analysis of the answers about the feelings experienced (Fig. 3) shows that calm and tranquility is the feeling most frequently cited by respondents, which accounts for 50% of the answers. The tranquil atmosphere of the garden inspires reflection, meditation, and a general feeling of harmony between one self and the surrounding. Also, it is assumed that feelings and emotions we perceive in natural environment are relevant part of our experiences in nature. So, integration of results of first important experience in gardens (recreation) and current finding verify the assumption. Memories remembrance is another emotional aspects which was considered by 42.8% of respondents.
Figure 3: Feelings and emotional experiences.
Happiness is another feeling that gardens evoke for respondents, accounting almost 35% of the answers. Also, 33.7% of respondents mentioned feeling closer to nature. Therefore, it can be proven that there is a relationship between nature and positive feelings like happiness as well as comfortable (21.8%) and feeling healthier (19.4%). Feeling safe and freedom follow in decreasing frequency. Feeling I am different in this garden was less considered by respondents (2%). 50% 42.8% 35.3% 33.7% 21.8% 19.4% 15.5% 14.7% 2% 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Calmandtranquility Memoriesremembrance Happiness Closertonature Comfortable Feelhealthier Safety Freedom FeelIamdifferent *Corresponding author (R. ROSTAMI). H/P: +06-177187197 E-mail address: raheleh.rostami@yahoo.com. 2012. American Transactions on Engineering & Applied Sciences. Volume 1 No.3. ISSN 2229-1652 eISSN 2229-1660 Online Available at http://TuEngr.com/ATEAS/V01/281-294.pdf 289
4.4 GardenVisitationandWellbeing For better understanding about the importance of natural experience for peoples well-being, respondents were asked to rank the importance of visiting gardens for emotional and physical disease like: depression, sadness, tiredness and sickness along a 15 points measurement scale (1, not important at all; 2, not important; 3, important; 4, very important; 5, essential). A frequency analysis showed that responses range from important to essential. Respondents believed that visiting gardens could mostly reduce depression (94%) as well as removing tiredness, accounting almost 90% of answers. Also, results show that sadness (81.6%) and physical sickness (76.3%) could be better during and after garden visitations. Overall, findings revealed nature effects on betterment of both emotional and physical disease, widely emotional ones.
Table 1: Variables that Affect People Presence in the Gardens. Variables Very Much Much Less Very Less Not Effective Organization 37.9% 6.7% 6.7% 0.0% 3.0% Representative 37.9% 6.3% 6.5% 1.3% 2.4% Accessibility 27.2% 12.5% 10.1% 0.0% 4.5% Familiarity 27.2% 17.2% 8.4% 0.2% 1.3% Symbolism 28.2% 14.4% 6.0% 1.1% 4.3% Emotion 14.2% 14.7% 1.1% 0.9% 1.9% Activity 13.4% 5.4% 6.5% 2.4% 5.2% Memories 7.8% 8.6% 7.3% 3.4% 6.6% Naturalness 17.9% 6.5% 3.9% 0.6% 3.9%
At the end, to articulate aspects of historical Persian garden that could affect peoples presence, respondents were asked to rank the importance of the following features for people presence. Features include: gardens organization, accessibility, familiarity, activity, naturalness, emotion and memory of respondents about gardens, gardens representativeness and symbolisms. Findings indicate that all features ranged as essential one with different frequency (See Table 1). Gardens organizations as well as representativeness are considered as most important features that could affect people presence for almost 37.9% of respondents. Symbolism identified as second 290 Raheleh, Rostami, Hasanuddin Lamit, and Seyed Meysam Khsohnava
most important feature that affect 28% of people who visit these gardens. Most of respondents mentioned that people visit this garden because these gardens are historic. Accessibility and familiarity achieved a same value (27.2%) for people presence in gardens. Emotional and physical (activity) aspects of gardens follow in decreasing frequency, accounting around of the answers. Respondents garden related memories identified as the last factor that could affect people presence in gardens (7.8%). 5. DiscussionsandRecommendations The information emerged from the survey indicates that historical Persian gardens fulfils important residents needs in urban context. Obtained results are according to previous researches regarding peoples need to experience nature (Kaplan and Kaplan, 1989). People visit gardens primarily because they want to relax. Recreation is as an important need fulfilled in Persian gardens (49.6%). Residents considered gardens as recreational area which is mentioned in Chiesura (2004) research and important factors to make the city livable, pleasant and attractive for its citizens and this is why of respondents carry out social activities like being with others and family picnic in these gardens. Social activities that happened in these gardens signify Coley et al (1997) results that nature can encourage the use of outdoor spaces and increase social integration and interaction among neighbors which lead to trust, mutual understanding, shared values and supportive behavior (Loures et al., 2007). Therefore from the social point of view, historical Persian gardens considered by residents as urban nature and daily outdoor recreation opportunities are the main factors that Eronene et al (1997) believed could enhance every day well-being.
Furthermore, findings show that the experience of nature in the city is a source of a large array of positive feelings to people. Calm and tranquility is the most important feeling that residents experience in historical Persian gardens. Besides, feeling happiness, comfortable, safety, freedom and even healthier were frequently mentioned by respondents. Results confirmed psychological health effects of nature on positive moods like pleasure which were indicated by Ulrich (1982) as well as reduction of negative effects like anger and anxiety (Rohde and Kendle, 1994) which evoke calmness and tranquility and provide restorative environments that can help strengthen the activities of the right hemisphere of the brain and restore harmony to functions on the brain as a whole (Furnas, 1979). In other words, people who have access to nearby natural settings were *Corresponding author (R. ROSTAMI). H/P: +06-177187197 E-mail address: raheleh.rostami@yahoo.com. 2012. American Transactions on Engineering & Applied Sciences. Volume 1 No.3. ISSN 2229-1652 eISSN 2229-1660 Online Available at http://TuEngr.com/ATEAS/V01/281-294.pdf 291
found to be healthier overall than other individuals (Kaplan, 1989). And, all these emotional and psychological benefits contribute critically to the quality of human life, which in turn is a key component of sustainable development (Chiesura, 2004). This is why respondents ranged the importance of visiting gardens for emotional and physical disease as important and even as essential factors. Most of the respondents believed that during and after gardens visitation, depression and tiredness decreased and even sadness and physical disease could be lessened. 6. Conclusion In the context of this study, the role of historical Persian gardens as provider of social services and their importance for city sustainability has been addressed. Some results have been presented of a survey aimed at exploring the motives and perceptions of visitors of two well-known samples of historical Persian gardens. Some conclusive remarks can be made.
First of all, historical Persian gardens as natural urban area fulfill many social functions and psychological needs of citizens, which make these gardens a valuable municipal resource, and a key ingredient for city sustainability.
Secondly, attributes of the physical environment interact with various human characteristics, such as socio demographics and peoples perceptions of the environment could affect physical activities and this in turn influences health outcomes. So, links among environmental attributes, physical activity, body weight, and health can result in environmental compatibility and sense of attachment to a place which result on the quality of life and well-being.
Therefore, valuation of the various amenities, social and psychological services of urban areas should be integrated into project assessments procedure and be properly accounted for in policy decisions and urban planning strategies as well as users satisfactions, needs and their representation and participation in all aspects of urban life which are critical components in a sustainable city. 292 Raheleh, Rostami, Hasanuddin Lamit, and Seyed Meysam Khsohnava
7. References Beck, U. (1992). Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London, Sage Burgess, J ., Harrison, C.M., Limb, M., 1988. People, parks and the urban green: A study of popular meanings and values for open spaces in the city. Urban Study 25: 455473.Clark, E. (2004). The Art of Persian Garden. Crowood Press. Chiesura, A. 2004. The role of urban parks for the sustainable city. Landscape and Urban planning 68: 129-138 Coley, R., Kuo, F., Sullivan, W., 1997. Where does community grow? The social context created by nature in urban public housing. Environment and Beahvior 29:468-494 Conway, H. 2000. Parks and people: The social functions. Costanza, R., dArge, R., de Groot, R, Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Laskin, R., Sutton, P.and Van den belt, M. 1997. The value of the worlds ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387: 253-260 Ferris, J ., C. Norman, J . Sempik (2001). People, land and sustainability: Community gardens and the social dimension of sustainable development. Social and Administration 35 (5): 559-568 Eronene, S., Nurmi, J . E., and Aro, K. S. (1997). Planning-Oriented, Avoidant, and Impulsive Social Reaction Styles: A Person-Oriented Approach. J ournal of Research in Personality, 31, 3457. Gehl, J ., Gemzoe, L. 2001. New City Spaces. Copenhagen: Danish Architectural Press. Grahn, P. 1985. Mans needs for Urban parks, Greenery and Recreation. Institute for landscape planning, Swedish Agricultural university , Alnarp. Godbey, G., Grafe, A., J ames, W., 1992. The Benefits of Local Recreation and Park Services. A Nationwide Study of Perceptions of the American Public. College of Health and Human development, Pennsylvania State University, Pennsylvania Hartig, T., Mang, M., Evans, G., 1991. Restorative effects of natural environments experiences. Environmental Behavior 23: 3-26. J ongman, R.H.G., 1995. Nature conservation in Europe: Developing ecological networks. Landscape Urban Plann, 32:169-183 J ongman, R.H.G., M. Kulvik and I.Kristiansen, 2004. Eopean ecological networks and greenways. Landscape Urban Planning, 68: 05-319 Lothian, A. 1999. Landscape and the Philosophy of Aesthetic: Is landscape Quality Inherent in the Landscape or in the Eye of Beholder. Landscape and urban planning: 177-198 *Corresponding author (R. ROSTAMI). H/P: +06-177187197 E-mail address: raheleh.rostami@yahoo.com. 2012. American Transactions on Engineering & Applied Sciences. Volume 1 No.3. ISSN 2229-1652 eISSN 2229-1660 Online Available at http://TuEngr.com/ATEAS/V01/281-294.pdf 293
Hidalgo, M. C., Berto, R., Galindo, M. P., Getrevi, A. (2006). Identifying Attractive and Unattractive Urban Places: Categories, Restorativeness and Aesthetic Attributes. Medio Ambiente y Comportamiento Humano7(2): 115-133. Kaplan, S. 1983. A Model of Person-Environment Compatibility. Environment and Behavior, 15, 311-332 Kaplan, R., and Kaplan, S. (1989). The Experience of Nature: A Psychological Perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press. Kaplan, S. 1995. The Restorative Benefits of Nature: Toward an Integrative Framework. Environmental Psychology 15: 169 182. Krenichyn, K. (2004). "Women and Physical Activity in an Urban Park: Enrichment and Support through an Ethic of Care. Environmental Psychology 24: 117-130. Loures, L., Santos, R., and Panagopoulos, T. (2007). Urban Parks and Sustainable City Planning-the Case of Portimo, Portugal. WSEAS Transactions on Environment and Development, 3(10), 171180. Maller, C., Townsend, M., Pryor, A., Brown, P., and St Leger, L. 2005. Healthy nature healthy people: contact with nature as an upstream health promotion intervention for populations. Health Promotion International, 21 (1), 45-54. Miller, R.W. 1988. Urban Forestry: Planning and Managing Urban Green Spaces. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ . Nasar, J . L. 1983. Adult Viewer's Preferences in Residential Scenes: A Study of the Relationship of Environmental Attributes to Preference. Environment and Behavior 32: 357-363 Opdam, P., E. Steingrover and S. Van Rooji. 2006. Ecological networks: Aspatial concept for multi-actor planning of sutainable lndscapes. Landscape Urban Plann 75: 322-324 Ozdemir, A. 2007. Urban sustainability and open space networks. Applied sciences 7(23): 3713-3720 Sachs, A. 1995. Eco-J ustice: linking human rights and the environment. World-watch Paper 127. Washington DC. Sibley, P. 1998. The Sustainable Management of Green Space, ILAM. Solecki, W.D., Welch, J .M., 1995. Urban parks: green spaces or green walls? Landscape Urban Plan. 32, 93106. 294 Raheleh, Rostami, Hasanuddin Lamit, and Seyed Meysam Khsohnava
St Leger, L. (2003). Health and Nature-New Challenges for Health Promotion. Health Promotion International, 18, 3, 173-175. Takano, T., Nakamura, K. and Watanabe, M. 2002. Urban residential environments and senior citizens longevity in mega-city areas: the importance of walkable green space. J . Epidemiol. Commun. Health 56, 12, 913916. Thompson, I. H. 2000. Ecology, Community and DelightSources of Values in Landscape Architecture. London: E and F.N. Spon. Thompson, C. W. 2002. Urban open space in the 21st century. Landscape and urban plan 60: 59-72 Tinsley, H. E. A. and C. E. Croskeys 2002. "Park Usage, Social Milieu, and Psychosocial Benefits of Parks Use Reported by Older Urban Park Users from Four Ethnic Groups. Leisure Science 24:199-218 Ulrich, R.S. 1981. Natural versus urban sciences: Some psycho-physiological effects. Environmental and Behavior 13: 523-556 Zhang, L and H. Wang., 2006. Planning and ecological network of Xiamen Island (China) using landscape metrics and network analysis. Landscape Urban Plan, 78 (4): 449-456 Peer Review: This article has been internationally peer-reviewed and accepted for publication according to the guidelines given at the journals website. Note: This article was accepted and presented at the 2 nd International Conference-Workshop on Sustainable Architecture and Urban Design (ICWSAUD) organized by School of Housing, Building & Planning, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia from March 3 rd -5 th , 2012.
Raheleh Rostami received her MSc in Architecture in 2006 from Islamic Azad University of Kerman. Currently she is a PhD Candidate in Landscape Architecture in Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Her current research interests are landscape design and its history and philosophy, people's perceptions and behaviors with regard to urban landscapes and integration of public perceptions and values in planning and management of urban open spaces.
Dr.Hasanuddin Lamit received his PhD in Architecture from Sheffield University, United Kingdom. Currently, he is an Associated Professor in the Faculty of Built Environment Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. His current research interests are urban design and history / philosophy of landscape architecture.
Seyed Meysam Khoshnava is currently a master student in Construction Management in Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. His current research interests are Green and Sustainability, and application of softwares such as BIM, Autodesk Ecotech, and Auto desk Green Studio.