You are on page 1of 1

Sport and Society

Developing Sport in Glasgow the


Issues
WRITTEN ASSESSMENT MARKING
CRITERIA
Generic assessment criteria

Highest learning
activities
undertaken.

Introduction to
concept of sport
development and
connections with
wider society


600
(15%)

Needs assessment/
identification of
main issues in
Glasgow and
theoretical
explanations

1250 (25%):

Critical analysis
of current sport
for development
schemes and
mechanisms of
action

1250
(25%):

Future
predictions/recommendations
for sport development in
Glasgow



900
(20%)

Presentation style (5%)
(Spelling and grammar,
assignment structure, sub-
structure linkage
Use of specialised vocabulary)

Referencing (Minimum of 25
not including web refs, 10%)
(15%)
A. Articulate and well argued showing an accurate
interpretation of the specific assessment criteria. Clearly
demonstrates critical application of theoretical principles
and evaluation of issues. Clear understanding of relevant
wider issues with evidence of original thought. Evidence
of reading with understanding beyond the course
recommendations. Excellent use of language and
specialist vocabulary. Excellent referencing in text and
in end reference list.
Reflect
Generalise
Theorise





B1. Displays some of the qualities above, but less
detailed exploration of the issues under discussion and
less certain application of the theoretical principles.
Demonstrates the ability to critically analyse and
evaluate. Good understanding of relevant wider issues
with evidence of some original thought. Evidence of
wider reading. Good structure. Effective use of language
and specialist vocabulary. Accurate referencing.


A mix of above
and below


B2. Satisfactory interpretation of the assessment criteria.
In the main, arguments are logical and include evidence
of critical analysis and evaluation. Structure satisfactory,
but answer lacks focus and less certain of some concepts.
Appropriate use of language and specialist vocabulary.
Some evidence of wider reading. Few referencing errors.
Analyse
Explain
Relate
Apply
Discuss
Compare and
contrast

C. Limited evidence of the ability to critically analyse
and evaluate. Demonstrates fair understanding of the
specific assessment criteria and main issues. Arguments
are weak but can be understood. Acceptable level of
written expression. Limited evidence of wider reading.
The use of language and specialist vocabulary is weak.
Referencing is fair and mainly correct.


A mix of above
and below

D. Poor structure and lacking relevance to specific
assessment criteria. Descriptive in nature with some
major inaccuracies however shows some potential.
Referencing is inaccurate with very limited evidence of
wider reading. Poor expression.
List
Describe



E. Fails to address the assessment criteria. Descriptive in
nature. Structure not evident. Many major inaccuracies.
Little or no referencing; poor expression. Poor
presentation.
As above and:
Paraphrase
Identify
Name

Examiner Feedback


Final Mark

You might also like