Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Megan Voegele
Professor Hudson
11/05/09
Comparative Analysis of “Sweat the Small Stuff” by Stephen Delaney and “The Act
his article “Sweat the Small Stuff.” He uses passages from several novels to illustrate
what authors use details for. He highlights the importance of everything from a single
strand of hair to “a pebble in one’s shoe”. Related to a different area of the novel is
the subject, exploring the authenticity of the writer’s world. He questions the idea of the
novelist “pretending” to make assertions through his narrative. This article lies in a
formal genre categorized by its content, structure, and language whereas the Delaney
Both of the articles call for a somewhat educated age bracket, but the Martinez
article requires a higher level of specification. The writing seems to be intended for
scholars, fiction theorists, professors or graduate students. He assumes that his audience
can identify with several of the major theories involving novelistic discourse and that
scholars want to apply this knowledge to the article. The readers will spend anywhere
from a half hour to an hour interpreting the work and gleaning it for information. The
audience may be reading this article to broaden their studies of fiction or use it for their
Voegele 2
other novelistic theories, just as the author argued against several with his own support.
Martinez wants his readers to realize that statements in novels “have referents beyond
themselves, are true or false. But they are not real utterances. They are as fictitious as the
events they describe or narrate. “(427). It is expected that scholars will use the argument
attacks theory, Delaney reaches out to aspiring fiction writers (or gives tips to the already
established). His article exists as a sort of teaching guide that shows writers how to use
details to give depth to their work. He expects his audience to have basic working
knowledge of novels and skill in literary interpretation. Most of the people reading this
article will be college students, book club members, or authors looking to improve their
work. The article came from Writer Magazine and that seems to consist of most of the
community there. Most are casual readers that will not want to spend any more than 15
minutes reading a featured piece, and it is expected that they will use it to brush up on
their own use of detail. The magazine has articles focusing on various aspects of the
writing process, and this is just one of many. The most important thing Delaney wants
his audience to learn is that “ If we imagine a work of fiction as a house, small things
aren’t just the clapboard and trim (though they often are), but they can be structural
elements as well.” (1-2). In other words, details can be pivotal, observed out of habit, or
used to highlight some theme of a novel such as tragedy. Delaney wants aspiring writers
Just like his keen attention to details, Delaney has carefully selected passages
from stories such as ”A Rose for Emily” by Faulkner or “ The Monkey’s Paw” by W.W.
Jacobs. He uses these passages as examples for the type of details great authors should be
writing. With each new story he shows what degree the detail was in terms of its effect
for the narrative. For example, in “A Rose for Emily” the hair lets the reader know the
final outcome of the plot. Details can also be used to deceive the reader, like in Edgar
Allen Poe’s “Ligeia”: “ At length it became evident that a slight, a very feeble, and a
barely noticeable tinge of color had flushed up within the cheeks,…” (2). This causes the
reader to think that she’s alive, but the next sentences reveal that she’s truly not. These
didactic sources. Since the article was from a fiction writing magazine, it was appropriate
Martinez has to choose a different kind of source for his article—he is not
analyzing the individual mechanics of fiction but the validity of the writer’s sentences in
John Searle, Frege, and Roman Jakobson. They hold that the author makes
“semistatements; they are statements and have meaning, but are, nonetheless, neither true
nor false.” (427). Martinez argues that “they are statements, function fully as assertions,
have referents beyond themselves, are true or false. But they are not real utterances.”
Martinez rolls through several similar theories in his article and he questions each one.
The philosophers are critical in hammering along his thesis. It would have been
impossible for him to present the readers with a passage from a novel and expect them to
Voegele 4
trust his argument just because novels exist. He needs evidence outside of that source that
article and therefore written single spaced, indented, with no spaces between paragraphs.
philosophy. He gets to his thesis at around the end of the second page, and continues
batting theory against theory in each following paragraph. He concludes with a final stab
against his opposition and then follows with the notes page. The structure was designed
to show a logical progression of arguments that the audience could work from.
“Sweat the Small Stuff” definitely has a different look. It has similarities to a blog
post, with its single spaced but not indented paragraphs. There are spaces between the
paragraphs. Delaney starts off with a quote to grab his audience attention and then
expands on the many different uses of details with every following paragraph. Its simple
structure helps the audience stay focused and narrow down each area Delaney touches on.
He ends not on an argument but on a meditative statement, and then the article follows
Delaney’s work is somewhat informal. He uses shorter sentences, and some of his
paragraphs are only three sentences long. He definitely makes an attempt to get down to
the same level as the reader. He questions the reader directly and offers his own
emotional responses to the details he has provided. His diction isn’t as specialized, but he
does use words specific to the genre such as “Truism”, “elements”, and “narrative force.”
average about 40 words long and separated by dozens of commas. The paragraphs can
Voegele 5
sometimes take up nearly half the page, and the diction is very academic. He uses
“semistatements”. He rarely uses “I” even though the essay is written in first person, and
this gives him a distinct objectivity toward his subject. It also distances him from the
While “The Act of Writing Fiction” dives into a more complex and compelling
argument, “Sweat the Small Stuff” is definitely easier to read. They are two prime
examples of how two articles on a common subject can be so drastically different when
they are split into separate genres. It is also interesting to note that the two articles had to
use different kinds of sources in order to validate their theses. It’s fascinating that while
the narrator’s validity for the sake of fiction itself. It is an excellent thing to explore a
topic beyond the genre one is used to; it results in unlikely discoveries and most of all—
wisdom.
Voegele 6
Works Cited
Delaney, Stephen. "Sweat the Small Stuff." The Writer Magazine Jan. 06. Print.
Martinez-Bonati, Felix. "The Act of Writing." New Literary History 11.3 (1980): 425-34. Print.