Republic of the Philippines

Polytechnic University of the Philippines

College of Architecture and Fine Arts
PUP-NDC Compound, Anonas Street corner Pureza Street
Sta. Mesa, Manila



Thesis Title:
COLT 45 REHABILITATION CENTER FOR
YOUNG ALCOHOLIC PROFESSIONALS
Rehabilitation of Playballs-Pureza Designed against the Negativity of Alcoholism
Integrating Convertible Architecture





A Thesis Presented to the
Faculty of the PUP-CAFA Department of Architecture





In Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the
Degree of Bachelor of Science in Architecture





By:

Juan S. Dela Cruz
Bachelor of Science in Architecture 5-10
2014-10101-MN-0





Architect Maria Rodora M. Argamino, uap
Co-Author



March 2014

Republic of the Philippines
Polytechnic University of the Philippines
College of Architecture and Fine Arts
PUP-NDC Compound, Anonas Street corner Pureza Street
Sta. Mesa, Manila

PERMIT TO DELIBERATE

This is to certify that

Juan S. Dela Cruz

Proponent of the undergraduate thesis entitled:

COLT 45 REHABILITATION CENTER FOR
YOUNG ALCOHOLIC PROFESSIONALS
Rehabilitation of Playballs-Pureza Designed against the Negativity of Alcoholism
Integrating Convertible Architecture

Had undergone consultations and submitted the minimum requirements for deliberation with the
following ratings:

Consultation 1 ______
Consultation 2 ______
Consultation 3 ______
Consultation 4 ______
Consultation 5 ______
Consultation 6 ______
Consultation 7 ______
Minimum Requirements ______

Pre-Deliberation Grade ______

Passed Failed


Archt. Maria Rodora M. Argamino, uap
Thesis Adviser

______________________________________________________________________________


Based on the above evaluation, the above proponent is hereby:

Allowed Not Allowed

To continue with the oral defense.


Archt. Jocelyn A. Rivera-Lutap, uap, DPA
Thesis Evaluation Committee Chairman

<date>
Date
Republic of the Philippines
Polytechnic University of the Philippines
College of Architecture and Fine Arts
PUP-NDC Compound, Anonas Street corner Pureza Street
Sta. Mesa, Manila
THESIS EVALUATION SHEET
ARCH 3425: Architectural Design 9

Name of Student: ____________________________________________ Date: __________________
Thesis Title: ________________________________________________ Time: _________________
_________________________________________ Adviser: Archt. Maria Rodora M. Argamino, uap

Note: Rate the student according to each criterion from 60% to 100%. Passing average is equivalent to 75%
USE PEN AND INITIAL ANY ERASURE.

CRITERIA
GRADE
(60%-
100%)
1. RESEARCH AND COMPUTATION / ORGANIZATION
Is the study / project important / relevant /innovative?
Is the research methodology appropriate?


Are the reviewed literature / case studies relevant and useful?
2. RESEARCH DATA ANALYSIS
Was the site selected fully satisfied?
Was the macro and micro analysis of site date relevant and informative?
Is the site analysis comprehensive?
Were the expected users / client properly identified?
And the 3ehaviour pattern and requirements of expected users/ client analyzed?

Were the spaces identified and adaptable to local conditions?
Were the area requirement properly computed?

Is the proponent aware of the relevant laws, regulations and government legislation?
Is the proponent aware of the environmental / development impart of the project?

3. DEVELOPMENT AND DESIGN FRAMEWORK
Is the design philosophy appropriate? Is the design concept and sub-concept cohesive?
Is the design concept on the building and environmental systems to be applied innovative
and applicable? Are the style guides adapted appropriate?

4. CONCEPTUAL DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
Are the spaces on site properly zoned according to function and other consideration?
Are the conceptual sketches appropriate?

5. ORAL PRESENTATION AND BOOK
Is the student on time and in properly attire? Were the study / project properly explained?
Was the presentation creative?Was it effective?
Was the content of the book complete and concise?
Was the book presentation clear, informative and creative?

Total
Average: Total / 14

Passed Failed


Name and Signature of Juror Date

Note:
94 100 Excellent 82 87 Good 75 Passing
88 93 Very Good 76 81 Satisfactory 60 74 Failure


Republic of the Philippines
Polytechnic University of the Philippines
College of Architecture and Fine Arts
PUP-NDC Compound, Anonas Street corner Pureza Street
Sta. Mesa, Manila


JURORS COMMENT SHEET
ARCH 3425: Architectural Design 9






































________________________________________
Prepared by:
Signature over Printed Name
_________________________
Date